Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Characterization of nC60 fullerene particles in natural and synthetic waters.
Fullerenes were named after Buckminster Fuller, the architect
of the geodesic dome. C60 is nicknamed the “Buckyball.”
Materials and Methods
These experiments involved a series of syringe filtra-
tion followed by various methods to characterize C60 parti-
cles. Two experiments were conducted in different media:
(1) “Aqu-nC60,” C60 continuously stirred in
Nanopure water for two years.
(2) “WR-nC60,” C60 stirred in filtered Willamette
River water, in comparison with “SW-nC60,” C60
stirred in synthetic water that has been adjusted
for organic carbon, ionic strength, and pH with
Aldrich humic acid, NaCl, and HCl, respectively.
This experiment is ongoing and full results are
not yet available.
Each solution had 100 mg/L MER 99+% C60 and all me-
dia were made with 17+ MΩ Nanopure water and passed
through a 20 nm-pore size syringe filter.
Analytical methods:
Electrophoretic mobility for zeta potential using the BIC
ZetaPALS Zeta Potential Analyzer
Dynamic light scattering for particle size using the ZetaPALS
particle sizing software
UV-Vis spectrum with a HP 8453 Spectrophotometer
Total organic carbon with a Shimadzu TOC combustion analyzer
Transmission electron microscopy for size and morphology us-
ing a FEI Titan TEM.
Aqu-nC60 Results
Fig. 3: Multimodal size distribution of
unfiltered 2-year aqu-nC60. Diameters
range from 200-1150 nm. MSD intensity
estimation is heavily weighted toward
the few, large particles. Due to instru-
mental limitations, reporting one mean
diameter oversimplifies the polydis-
perse size distribution.
WR-nC60 and SW-nC60 Results
Fig. 4: Mean hydrodynamic diame-
ter of C60 in all three media for three
consecutive filtrations. The aqu-nC60
is smaller, most likely because it had
a longer stirring period. Differences
in media, such as ionic strength and
organic matter content, also affect
size.
Fig. 5: Zeta potential of C60 particles
after two weeks for three filtration
steps. The SW-nC60 has consistently
higher zeta potential than the WR-
nC60, even though ionic strength and
base DOC concentration should be
equal. It is too early to observe
trends over time.
Fig. 6: Absorbance spectra of C60 in
Willamette River and synthetic wa-
ter after being filtered through 1.0
µm and 0.45 µm pore-sized syringe
filters. The C60 shows a small peak at
λ=365 nm. Lower absorbance at the
smaller filtration step indicates that
the concentration is decreasing, and
this is confirmed by TOC data.
Conclusion Already, differences in zeta potential and particle size
have been observed between the WR-nC60 and the SW-
nC60. When assessing C60 behavior in the environment, re-
searchers should considered tests with actual natural wa-
ter, not solely simulated synthetic water, and that time
spent stirring should be carefully chosen. This experiment
is ongoing, and possible work in the future includes C60 as-
sociation with other particles.
Acknowledgements
Much appreciation to: Ben Place and Jennifer Field; Don
Bloomquist, Dylan Stankus, and Ian Maguire; Kathy Motter;
Kurt Langworthy; Mohammad Azizian; and my mentor Jeff
Nason. This project was funded by the Subsurface Biosphere
Initiative.
What is a fullerene?
Unintentionally discovered in 1985,
a fullerene is an allotrope of carbon that
has the structure of hollow spheres or
tubes. With 60 carbon atoms, C60 is the
smallest possible spherical fullerene. Its
atoms are bonded together to form an
icosahedron much like a nano-sized soc-
cer ball. The diameter of a C60 molecule
is only about 7 Å, or 0.7 nm.
Why do we care?
In recent years, fullerenes have been used
in a range of applications, from medical imag-
ing to cosmetics, and the use of fullerenes and
functionalized fullerenes are expanding rap-
idly. Their fate in the natural environment and
potential toxic effects to life forms, however,
are relatively unknown.
C60 is nearly insoluble in water and in aqueous environ-
ments, the molecules cluster into nano– and larger particles.
Recent research focuses much on the characterization of
these unique particles and will allow their transport and
bioavailability in the environment to be better predicted.
Project Introduction
This research project attempts to answer questions
about the nature of the C60 particles that have not yet been
addressed by researchers: What are the differences between
C60 stirred over time in actual natural water as compared to
laboratory synthetic water? What are the characteristics of
C60 that has been continuously stirred in Nanopure water,
without organic solvents, for two years? How can the
polydisperse distribution of particle sizes within the sus-
pensions be accurately measured and reported?
Michelle Adlong • Dr. Jeffrey Nason • School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering Oregon State University • Corvallis, OR 97331
Fig. 2: Continuously stirred
C60 at two weeks in (a) Wil-
lamette River water and (b)
synthetic water.
Fig. 1: Structure of C60.
Carbon atoms form 12
pentagons and 20
hexagons connected in
a spherical cage.
Hydrodynamic Diameter (nm)
Rel
ativ
e In
ten
sity
& N
um
be
r
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Ze
ta P
ote
nti
al
(mV
)
C60 inWillametteRiver Water
C60 inSyntheticWater
Unfiltered 1.0 μm filtered 0.45 μm filtered
Week 1 Week 2 Week 1 Week 1 Week 2 Week 2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Me
an H
ydro
dyn
amic
Dia
me
ter
(nm
)
WR-nC60, 1 wkstirred
SW-nC60, 1 wkstirred
Aqu-nC60, 2 yrsstirred
Unfiltered 1.0 μm filtered
0.45 μm filtered M
ean
Hyd
rod
ynam
ic D
iam
ete
r
References Bouchard, D., Ma, X., & Isaacson, C. (2009). “Colloidal Properties of Aqueous Fullerenes: Isoelectric Points and Aggregation Kinetics of C60 and C60 Derivatives.” Environmental Science & Technology. July 14, 2009.
Fomkin, A.A. (2009). “Nanoporous Materials and their Adsorption Properties.” Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, Vol. 45 (No. 2), 133–149.
Li, Q., Xie, B., Hwang, Y.S., & Xu, Y. (2009). “Kinetics of C60 Fullerene Dispersion in Water Enhanced by Natural Organic Matter and Sunlight.” Environmental Science & Technology. March 2, 2009.
0.00
0.05
0.10
300 350 400
SW 1.0umfiltered
SW 0.45umfiltered
WR 1.0umfiltered
WR 0.45umfiltered
Ab
sorb
ance
(A
U)
Wavelength