20
Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Material Quality

Andrew Sullivan

National Operations Waste Unit

Page 2: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Content

• Legislative duties

• Waste Hierarchy

• High Quality Recycling

• Material Quality Action Plan

• Transfrontier Shipment

Page 3: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Why is Quality Important

• UK recyclate quality is regarded as poor!

• Need to support UK manufacturing – recyclate imported.

• TFS issues increasing – more frequent ‘green list’ repatriations.

• MRF fines disappearing or mismanaged – illegal disposal.

• Opportunity to add value and contribute to sustainable economic growth.

Page 4: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2011 & 2012

• It shall be the duty of any person who produces or manages controlled waste… …to take all reasonable steps to;

• Apply the waste hierarchy.

• Ensure that the waste

is managed in a manner

that promotes high

quality recycling.

Page 5: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Waste Hierarchy

Page 6: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Waste Hierarchy & High Quality Recycling

• Statutory guidance will be consulted on in October.

• Provides the priority order for common waste streams and the evidence base.

• High quality recycling is closed loop recycling.

• Legal duty to design and operate collection and sorting systems in a manner which prioritise high quality recycling.

• High quality recycling tends to need high quality materials to be viable.

Page 7: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit
Page 8: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

What are the Causes of Low Quality?

• Non-target materials placed in bins by waste producers.

• Co-mingling with unsuitable wastes.

• Over compaction in collection vehicles.

• Physical capability of MRFs to effectively separate materials.

• Poor operational practice within the MRF.

Page 9: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Material Quality Action Plan

• Systems designed to maximise high quality recycling.

• Reduce source contamination.

• Mandatory input/output sampling at MRFs

• Try to address PRN/PERN imbalance.

• Increased regulation of “green list” exports.

Page 10: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Source Segregation vs Co-Mingling

• WFD and Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2012 prioritise full source segregation.

• Derogation for co-mingling provided quality of material is “not significantly lower” than if collected separately.

• Co-mingled systems which result in significant tonnage going to lower quality outcomes are unlikely to be compliant with the regulations.

• Need to be able to justify collection method in terms of derogation, waste hierarchy and the duty to promote high quality recycling.

Page 11: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Collections Hierarchy

Higher

Risk

Lower

Risk

Page 12: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Mandatory MRF Sampling

• Proposed to start from 2014.

• Implemented through WML/PPC

• Applies to “clean” and “dirty” MRFs over <1000 tonnes per annum.

• Does not apply to C&D MRFs or transfer stations.

• Quarterly reporting to SEPA.

• Data to be made publicly available

Page 13: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Transfrontier Shipment

• Most exports of MRF sorted material will be under “green list” procedures.

• Unsorted wastes can not be exported under “green list” procedures but must be notified.

• Highly contaminated materials can not be exported under “green list” procedures.

• MRF sorted material carries a higher risk of illegal export and will be the focus of SEPA’s activity.

• Liability for repatriation can come right back to a Local Authority.

Page 14: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

The Good - Cardboard

Page 15: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

The Good – Mixed Plastic Bottles

Page 16: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

The Bad – Unsorted Material

Page 17: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

The Ugly – Clinical Waste

Page 18: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

The Ugly – Food waste

Page 19: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Conclusions

• Must apply the Hierarchy as a priority order and promote high quality recycling.

• High quality recycling is closed loop recycling.

• Systems which lose significant tonnage to low quality end-uses unlikely to comply with the regulations.

• Reduction of source contamination crucial.

• Mandatory MRF sampling from 2014.

• SEPA stepping up TFS activity on municipal waste.

Page 20: Material Quality Andrew Sullivan National Operations Waste Unit

Any Questions?