Upload
nguyendung
View
220
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© 2012 Material Handling Industry®. Copyright claimed as to audiovisual works of seminar
sessions and sound recordings of seminar sessions. All rights reserved.
Welcome to Session 129
Sponsored by: Presented by:
Material Handling in Manufacturing and
Distribution – Optimized Intelligence
Mark Lewis Director, Value Chain Execution – Oracle
Norman Saenz Senior VP & Principal – TranSystems
Justin Anders Business Analyst - Golfsmith International
The idea for this session came from an article last June in Supply Chain Digest :
Logistics New: Where Does the Intelligence Belong in Automated
Material Handling Systems?
"The WMS should have all the information it needs to make all the decisions,“…
… "The WCS should just take that decision about where a carton goes, deliver
it, and then tell us that it's there. With this approach, you avoid a lot of potential
issues about where the logic for something really lies.“
- SCD, June 28, 2011
What Does “Optimized Intelligence” Mean?
2
Warehouse
System 1
Manufacturing Procurement Order Management
Warehouse
System 2
Warehouse
System N
RF /Automation
Integration and Operation Complexity, Localized Solutions
RF /Automation RF /Automation
Material Handling as Part of a Broader Whole
3
Think in Terms of Solution Capabilities as a single whole
Transaction Integration
Process Synchronization
Converged
Optimization Analytics
Order Management
Order Capture
Solution(s)
Order Management
Transportation
Management
Warehouse
Management
Fleet
Mgmt
Global
Trade
Automation
& RFID
Labor
Inte
gra
ted
Op
tim
izati
on
In
teg
rate
d
Bu
sin
es
s In
tellig
en
ce
Quality Production Service
Integrated via a single Architecture
4
Seamless
Integration
Warehouse Management Solution Solution Part I
Transportation Manufacturing Fulfillment Purchasing
RTVs Orders Transfers
RMAs Purchases Transfers Tailorable
Rules &
Workflow
Process Global Visibility
RF Support
Inspect Receive
Ship Pack Directed
Pick
Cost
Assemble
WIP Issues
Transfer
Count
Move
Replen- ish
Label
Cross Dock Putaway
5
BACKEND
WMS/ERP
MATERIAL
HANDLING
EQUIPMEN
TS
Configuration Layer
Directive Configuration Device Configuration
Pick and
Putaway
Tasks
WMS Device
Definition
WAREHOUSE CONTROL SYSTEM (WCS)
Business
Event
Association Transport Layer
Process Layer
Carousel Bridge
Process Directives
Device Simulator
Custom MHE Integration Process XML/CSV File
Monitor Equipments
Material Handling Control System Solution Part II
6
- From “WMS vs. WCS”, HK Systems, 2010
This “Discussion” has been going on for years Is There a “Best” Answer?
7 7 7
Recent advances in WCS technology are enabling these
systems to perform some of the fulfillment processes
traditionally reserved for a WMS.
Similarly, many WMS now provide interfaces to manage
automated handling equipment – a task traditionally
managed by a WCS.
What should you be looking at to make the right decision
for your operations?
WMS, WCS or BOTH?
8
TRADITIONAL HIERARCHY ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
PLANNING
Demand Mgmt
APS
Customers
Suppliers
Carriers
Customers
Suppliers
Carriers
ADMIN/FINANCE
Purchasing
Order Management
EDI /
WEB
EDI /
WEB
Material Handling Device Control Data Entry Devices
WMS LABOR
MANAGEMENT
YARD
MANAGEMENT
TMS
W i r e l e s s o r L o c a l A r e a N e t w o r k
E n t e r p r i s e N e t w o r k
MANUFACTURING
MRP
MES
Task
Mgmt
Order
Plan/
Release
Inventory
Mgmt Shipping Receiving Storage
Staging
Loading
Picking
Replen
9
1990’s: WCS EMERGE
Customers
Suppliers
Carriers
Customers
Suppliers
Carriers
EDI /
WEB
EDI /
WEB
WCS Data Entry Devices
WMS LABOR
MANAGEMENT
W i r e l e s s o r L o c a l A r e a N e t w o r k
E n t e r p r i s e N e t w o r k
ENTERPRISE SYSTEM
Conventional Material Handling Automated Material Handling
Task
Mgmt
Order
Plan/
Release
Shipping Receiving Storage Staging
Loading
Picking
Replen
Inventory
Mgmt
10
WAREHOUSE CONTROL SYSTEMS
1990’s: PLC’s for
material handling
storage & conveyor
equipment control &
diagnostics to speed
item flow from receipt
to order release,
picking & shipment.
11
Today: PC’s & expanded
functionality including
order analysis, release &
status monitoring, AIDC
management & a host of
additional equipment
interfaces coupled with
line & activity balancing .
WAREHOUSE CONTROL SYSTEMS
12
THE LINES ARE BLURRING
13
If both make sense for your requirements, develop detailed
specifications that define which system controls which
functions, data synchronization processes and timing,
exception handling – AND, who is accountable for overall
system performance.
Avoid customization – it adds cost, lengthens implementation
time & increases risk.
“WMS and WCS have complementary solution sets that need
to work together. Instead of looking at this as a battle between
WMS & WCS, solutions providers need to look at finding the
right balance of both that results in the best answer for the
customer’s operational needs.”
FINAL THOUGHTS
14
Golfsmith International, Inc.
Founded in 1967
Largest golf-specialty retailer in the world – which
includes 82 retail locations, a UK wholesale-distribution
center, catalogs and a website
250,000 square foot shipping and distribution facility
15
Pre-Implementation Systems
Existing ERP Application – implemented in 1999
Warehouse Management and MHE
• Custom WMS developed out of ERP application
• Conveyor system in direct-to-consumer shipping, controlled by a
custom WCS – installed circa 1997
o Tote “married” to order at induction
o Tote diverted to picking aisle
o Paper-based pick
• Pick-to-Light system in retail shipping - installed circa 1998
o Pick by zone
• Scanners used only in receiving and 2 retail-replenishment
subinventories – implemented in 1999
16
ERP/WMS/WCS Change Process
2010 - Golfsmith decided to upgrade our ERP to current version
Do we use ERP WMS, or another 3rd party vendor?
Points of Considerations on choosing a WMS:
Ease of implementation
System maintenance and upkeep
Does it fulfill our process requirements?
Does it help improve our processes?
Cost savings and ROI
Labor Management and Resource Planning
Room to expand?
17
MHE Issues & Considerations
Direct Conveyor Control System Server issues
Written in Visual Basic
Lack of knowledge in coding – ability to make changes
Pick-To-Light System Hardware failures
Replacement parts obsolete
Server issues
Questions in efficiency and cost savings with our current
processes
18
MHE Changes Pick-to-Light
• Decided to remove the existing PTL system
• Now pick via wireless handheld using ERP WMS (Note: all picking in the DC via mobile devices)
• Benefits
Pick times
Material costs
Conveyor control system • Decided to upgrade our existing 3rd party control system
• ERP WCS would work, but required customizations to fit
current conveyor and pulling methodology.
• Required customizations were not supported in base WCS.
( Note: can provide technical specifics if needed. Please ask in Q/A due to time
considerations.
• System was re-coded in .NET
• Improved interfaces for induction and control
• Migrated to improved hardware
19
Timeline
ERP implementation process began in May 2010.
Went live with latest ERP version on October 2, 2011 (16 months)
Warehouse implementation could have been rolled out in 12
months. This includes ERP WMS and all supporting systems and
hardware - WMS, mobile , labels, scanners, printers, etc.
20
Results
Entire shipping and distribution now integrated with ERP WMS. All
picking performed with handheld scanners.
Allows us to track performance and labor metrics.
Decrease in “mis-pulls” and missing items
Material cost savings
Task management
Future Goals
Voice-picking
Improved cross-docking
Warehouse cycle-counting
Improved labor management – proactive, rather than reactive.
21
Questions?
22
© 2012 Material Handling Industry®. Copyright claimed as to audiovisual works of seminar
sessions and sound recordings of seminar sessions. All rights reserved.
For More Information:
Speaker: [email protected]
Visit MODEX 2012 Booth #207