Upload
geneva
View
33
Download
5
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Massive Galaxies at high redshift. GOODS http://www.stsci.edu/science/goods Lewnida s (Lexi) Moustakas Space Telescope Science Institute M Dickinson, H Ferguson, M Giavalisco R Somerville, T Dahlen, B Mobasher, H Yan. ~3x10 10 M o. The SDSS z~0 age/stellar mass relation. age. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Massive Galaxies at high redshift
GOODS
http://www.stsci.edu/science/goods
s (Lexi) MoustakasSpace Telescope Science Institute
M Dickinson, H Ferguson, M GiavaliscoR Somerville, T Dahlen, B Mobasher, H Yan
2
~3x1010 Mo
From Kauffmann et al.
The SDSS z~0 age/stellar mass relation
Kauffmann et al. 2002
ag
e
3
outline The public GOODS -- new: Spitzer! -- identifying massive field galaxies at redshifts z>1
color-selected samples & fitting SEDs EROs, IRAC-EROs, J-K-selection ...
Conclusions:1. Galaxies with M>few x 1010Msun are abundant even at z~1, 2, 3
2. Spitzer's rest-frame IR observations are key
In progress: Towards a complete census of masses and SFRs at all z's Properties as function of local environment (always in the field)
4
galaxy formation:an observational goal
A major goal is to measure the distribution function of stellar mass and star formation rates over time and environment
f(M, M/t, t, )
This encapsulates the assembly history via all modes -- quiescent star formation, starbursts, &c.
Enter GOODS
5
What is GOODS?
The -Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey- An orchestration of deep observations of the
HDFN and the CDFS regions (~ 300 square arcmin in total) with the most powerful telescopes over the widest wavelength range
30 times larger solid angle than HDFN + HDFS Based on large programs with Spitzer, HST,
Chandra, Newton, VLT, and more. All datasets and derived products are open to
the public domain
6
A Synopsis of GOODS GOODS Space HST Treasury (PI: M. Giavalisco)
B, V, i, z (27.2, 27.5, 26.8, 26.7)
Δθ = 0.05 arcsec, or ~0.3 kpc at 0.5<z<5
SIRTF/Spitzer Legacy (PI: M. Dickinson)
3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8, 24 μm Chandra (archival):
0.5 to 8 KeV Δθ < 1 arcsec on axis
XMM-Newton (archival)
GOODS Ground ESO, (PI C. Cesarsky), CDFS
Full spectroscopic coverage in CDFS Ancillary optical and near-IR imaging
Keck, access through GOODS’ CoIs Deep spectroscopic coverage
Subaru, access through GOODS’ CoI Large-area BVRI imaging
NOAO support to Legacy & Treasury Very deep U-band imaging
Gemini Optical spectroscopy, HDFN Near-IR spectroscopy, HDFS
VLA, ultra deep HDFN (+Merlin, WSRT) JCMT + SCUBA sub-mm maps of HDFN
•hold •hold
7
GOODS-S imaging coverage
Chandra coverage shown is only over the best PSF region (6arcmin). Complete image covers the whole GOODS-S field.
VLT/ISAAC J & K coverage shown (ESO v1.0 public release, May 2004). ISAAC H-band covers roughly half that area.
8
1st epoch Spitzer GOODS CDF-S IRAC images
First epoch CDF-S IRAC data observed in February 2004:• 23.2 hours/position x 4 pointings• ~60% of field covered in each IRAC channel• ~20% of field has 4-channel overlap, including the HUDF
Second epoch in August 2004 will complete CDF-S IRAC observations
5 point source sensitivity (shot noise only):
4.5, 8.0 m
3.6, 5.8 m
10’
16’.5
Channel
Jy AB mag
3.6m 0.11 26.27
4.5m 0.21 25.57
5.8m 1.35 23.58
8.0m 1.66 23.35
9
HUDF
The HubbleUltra Deep Fieldin GOODS-South
BViz + JHz850~28
09 march '04
Beckwith et al. in prep
10
1.6 to 8 mm view of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field
What IRAC sees:
• Light from longer-lived, red stars that dominate the mass of galaxies, redshifted to IRAC wavelengths
• Starlight and active galactic nuclei obscured by dust
• Potentially capable of seeing extremely distant objects, z > 7, which are invisible to optical telescopes
11
Redward-marching CMDs
Overall color distribution gets bluer at longer wavelengths.
“ERO-like” objects get fainter and fewer, but are still seen out to H - 5.8 m color, corresponding to zERO > 3
Some bright galaxies pop up strongly at 8m; presumably PAH emission from low-z, brighter galaxies, or “unveiled” AGN.
12
the red sequence to z>1.4
Somerville & Moustakas et al - in prep
"extremely red galaxies"
Rest-frame color-magnitude diagrams,z~0.2 to z~1.8
These data are fromGOODS & GEMS, for different sampleselections. The pinkare K-selected. Redcircles are EROs.See how these glxsdominate the red sequence at z~1 etc!
13
Moustakas et al 2004, ApJL
most KAB<22 extremely red objects are old-star
dominatedearly late irregular other
See a
lso:
Yan
& T
hom
pson
2004;
Sm
ith e
t al 2
004
Bell e
t al 2
004
Space density of early-type EROs is n~2x10-4 Mpc-3
"EROs"
14
typical (old) ERO SED The spectral energy
distributions of the early-type EROs basically demand large ages, T>2Gyr
This is true even if there is some 'frosting' of star formation in place at z~1 (c.f. the DEEP2 findings)
This example has a GOODS:FORS2 redshift, z=1.19
The GOODS:FORS2 spectroscopy of ~80 EROs is being used for line-index diagnostics - Kuntschner et al, in prep
Moustakas et al in prep
An old-elliptical SED
Data
15
the (dark) art of SED fitting
Population synthesis fitting to observed SEDs of Lyman Break Galaxies at z~3 (inclusion of Spitzer data is forthcoming!).
A large wavelength range is needed, especially to the rest-IR.
Papovich 2002; Dickinson et al 2003
Significant mass from older stellar population can be hidden by ongoing star formation, -> 'maximum M/L models'
16
IRAC-Extremely Red Objects IRAC-selected with
fn(3.6mm)/fn(z850) > 20 (AB color > 3.25)
Like (R-K)Vega > 5 “ERO” criterion, but shifted to redder bandpasses.
We may expect that this will select ERO-like galaxies at z > 1.5 to 2
17 objects in HUDF area after excluding ambiguous cases due to blending
2 are undetectedundetected in ACS HUDF; others are detected (even in B435), but faint.
z - m(3.4m) vs redshift
Haojing Yan et al 2004, ApJ submitted
17
An “IERO” in the HUDF
ACS
NICMOS
IRAC
ISAAC
18
SED fitting for IEROsMost IEROs are best-fit with unreddened 2-component stellar populations:
• ~2.5 Gyr old stars• + secondary ~0.1 Gyr burst• zphot ~ 1.6 to 2.9
-Key result:- * In most IEROs, at z~2ish, OLD STARS are required. * Dust does not seem to be enough.
19
SEDs of the HUDF IEROsA few objects are poorly fit by old stellar models (e.g., with sharply rising flux to 8m)
Rest-frame K-band luminosities ~0.35 to 5 times present-day L*K for early-type galaxies, implying substantial stellar masses (~1010 - 1011 Msun)
Number density is comparable to or greater than that of present-day galaxies with similar luminosities
20
Completing the census
K-band EROs at z~1-1.5 3.6m IEROs at z~1.6-2.9 K-band J-K selection -> z~2.5 UV selected LBGs z~2.5-6 (and
>6?) In progress... collating all the galaxy
populations found to z~2.5 (ish) High-redshift teaser: stellar
populations of galaxies at z~5.8
21
z = 5.828 i-dropout in CDF-S
3.6m 4.5m
5.8m 8.0m
Excellent PSF greatly improves sensitivity at 3.6 and 4.5 m relative to proposal expectations.
Many of the brighter z~5-6 galaxies are well-detected in channels 1+2.
IRAC Ultradeep HDF-N observations (up to 100h exposure time) may yield detections in channels 3+4
22
Stellar population fitting for z=5.828 galaxy
Typical LBG colors.
Clear evidence for a Balmer break between K and 3.6m.
Otherwise blue SED (above & below break) suggests low reddening, but this is not well constrained.
Stellar mass estimate ~1.5x1010 Msun
which is slightly larger than typical for L* LBGs at z~3
4000 A break
observed wavelength
23
A STScI mini-Workshopon massive galaxies
27-29 September 2004
24
ConclusionsThe rest-infrared data are important! Multi- SED-fitting good for subtleties In the field, we find many massive
galaxies (M*>few x1010Msun) out to high-zThe space densities are significant,
n~10-4-10-3 Mpc-3, so important as model constraints (see RSS talk)
In progress: clustering/environment
25
The near future
3.6m 4.5m
5.8m 8.0m
Stand by for the GOODS *Ultradeep* IRAC observations
-and-the 24mm MIPS data
in both fields
26
27
J-K color for z~2-3 selection
Moustakas et al in prep
Recent application of this criterion & of photometric redshift:van Dokkum et al 2003; Franx et al 2003; Daddi et al 2004
threshold colorJ-K>1.37 (AB)J-K>2.3 (Vega)
28
3 limito = X-ray sources
jk - selection The sample I use here
is Ks-selected, restricted to SNRK>10
There are formal J-band dropouts that are included
Total sample size: 131 galaxies, ~1 arcmin-2
X-ray sources are tracked, so two samples explored 'wx' - X-ray sources 'nx' - remaining obj's
Moustakas et al in prep
10 limito = X-ray sources
29
jk - LBG comparison
Perhaps half of the jk sample would be too faint for ground-based R (rest-UV) selection to work...
NOT too faint for z850 selection, though (eg from GOODS). z850<26 for all jk galaxies!
The surface densities are comparable, ~1 arcmin-2
The UV colors are only somewhat red -- V-z~1magC.f. Steidel et al 2004 for z~2ish work
30
Distribution of jk sources
134 arcmin2
31
HUDF
The HubbleUltra Deep Fieldin GOODS-South
BViz + JHz850~28
09 march '04
Beckwith et al. in prep
32
jk - HUDF morphologies
~10'' x 8'', ACS z-band, 0.03''/pix
Moustakas et al in prep
33
Spatial associations
There is early evidence of strong spatial correlations (Daddi et al 2004)
Our own w() & ()
measurement is in prog.
The visual associations are
dramatic, and there is clearly strong correspondence with distinct X-ray sources
~1 arcmin across
Xray
Xray
34
jk - stellar masses
very early results show rest-frame colors suggest stellar masses quite comparable to EROs, ~1010Mo and higher
space densities may be comparable to EROs, as well ages are less constrained, still -- stay tuned.
-Possible implications-
EROs' progenitors were already fully in place upon formation?
Star formation rates must have been high and sustained earlier
-Questions-
How do AGN (and environment) figure in this picture?
What are their star formation rates?
35
Moustakas, Bauer, Immler et al in prep
jk - X-ray sources There are 19/131 X-ray sources
= 15% of the sample.
Considering the X-ray sources, and a typical redshift of z~2.2, we constrain the photon index and the in situ obscuring HI column, NH:
~1.2 & NH~1.2x1022 cm-2
Luminosity/object LX>1043 erg s-1
Largely => OBSCURED AGN
Constraining the photon index
36
jk - X-ray stack results
full soft hard
E(keV) 0.5-8 0.5-2 2-8
N 6.1 5.5 4.3
fX(cgs) 7x10-18 2.5x10-17
log(LX
)
42.1 41.6 42.2
Moustakas, Bauer, Immler et al in prep
Counts distributions
80 'clean' objects usedfor this stack
37
AGN vs Star Formation
The observed soft and hard fluxes imply a photon index of around ~ 1.8.
The estimated rest-frame LX(2-8keV) ~ 1042 erg s-1
AGNIf the obscuration is high, the hard-X-ray flux is absorbed, so the photon index will be larger.
The X-ray luminosity and are consistent with Seyfert-level AGN activity. Optical spectroscopy (van Dokkum et al 2003, Daddi et al 2004) do reveal some AGN features in the z~2 galaxies.
Large population of obscured AGN?
Star FormationFor a ~Salpeter IMF, and star formation rates somewhat above a few Msun/yr, there is a tight relation between SFR and LX, which arises from high-mass X-ray binaries and supernovae.
SFRX ~ 100 Msun/yr [Grimm et al 2003] SFRUV ~ few Msun/yr [Kennicutt 1998]
"Ultraluminous infrared galaxies"?
38
Comparison with UV-selected galaxies at z~2
Adelberger et al 2004; Steidel et al 2004; Reddy & Steidel 2004
The redshift ranges can be comparable The rest-UV colors are similar ~50% of jk galaxies would be missed by R-limit, but not by z-limit The implied X-ray and (uncorrected) UV SFRr are comparable The pure AGN fraction is similar; it may be higher for jk galaxies
All of these points suggest that results from UV-selected surveys are somewhat incomplete; and that AGN may in fact be more adundant than indicated so far.
39
Questions & implications
We are missing at least some of the mass and star formation at z~2-3
What is the relation of jk's with sub-mm bright z>2 ULIRGs?
There may be a significant amount of hidden AGN activity at earlier times.
40
J-K colors of SCUBA glxs Many (most??) SCUBA
sources are at <z>=2.4 (Chapman et al 2003)
The majority have IR counterparts & many have similar J-K colors (Frayer et al 2004)
The surface densities are comparable; but the Frayer sources are magnified by foreground cluster.our 10 limit
our reddest jk
our color cut
Frayer et al 2004
41
A picture
It seems that even at <z>~2.2, the progenitors of massive galaxies are already in place. Are these galaxies freshly 'assembled'? Or did that happen much earlier, still? Why and how would 'monolithic' collapse happen? This is a major challenge...
Even so, a lot is happening at that time. There is a lot of obscured AGN activity, that may be tracing something else. Morphologies are quite varied.
I suspect we're missing even more from the picture at z~3-4, where we might see the 'pieces' of these most massive galalxies, fall into place.
42
Clustering evolution - theory
Press-Schechter theory gives the abundance and clustering strength of dark matter halos
Similar global galaxy properties may be (should be) connected to the dark matter somehow
This connection can be made neatly with the 'occupation function'
Moustakas & Somerville 2002
43
dark matter halo masses
Moustakas & Somerville 2002
There can be many galaxies in each dark matter "halo", or none. Theaverage behavior can be parametrizedwith the Halo Occupation Function,or Distribution (cf Wechsler's talk)
N(M>Mmin) = (M/M1)
Mmin - threshold halo massM1 - 'typical' mass - mass function slope
"bias" comes from the clustering,which fixes the 'minimum' DM halo mass
space density
44
galaxies' dark matter halos
The occupation function parameters can be constrained through the measured clustering strength and the space density
Here we plot the results for z~0 ellipticals, z~1.2 EROs, and z~3 LBGs
45
clustering evolution The simplest model hasa
galaxies following the dark matter they're associated with -- 'galaxy conserving model' (Fry 1996)
See the behavior of populations with properties established at different redshifts. Do they 'connect'?
corr
ela
tion
scale
lin
ear
bia
s
46
glazebrook et al
Glazebrook et al. 2004 : comparison with low baryon-density models...
The "Gemini Deep Deep Survey", GDDS, stellarspace density meas'mt.
Comparison is to'GALFORM' models,Granato, Baugh.
Are hierarchical modelsthen, dead??