Upload
hanley
View
32
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Marshaling Data to Improve Patient Safety. Michelle Mello, JD, PhD Harvard School of Public Health. Data-Driven Patient Safety Improvement. Major Private Sector Data Collection Efforts. University HealthSystem Consortium’s Patient Safety Net - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Marshaling Data to Improve Patient Safety
Michelle Mello, JD, PhD
Harvard School of Public Health
Data-Driven Patient Safety Improvement
ReportAggregation
ReportAggregation
InterventionDesign
InterventionDesign
Adverse Event Reporting
Adverse Event Reporting
Data Analysis
Data Analysis
InterventionImplementation
InterventionImplementation
Major Private SectorData Collection Efforts
University HealthSystem Consortium’s Patient Safety Net 14 academic medical centers active, +5 by year end14 academic medical centers active, +5 by year end ~~ 250 reports/site/month across a broad range of incidents 250 reports/site/month across a broad range of incidents
(total n(total n≈22,000)≈22,000) Online reports submitted by clinical staff, risk managersOnline reports submitted by clinical staff, risk managers
DoctorQuality, Inc.’s Risk Prevention & Management System Several dozen participating institutionsSeveral dozen participating institutions ~ 70,000 reports to date~ 70,000 reports to date Online reports submitted by clinical staff, risk managersOnline reports submitted by clinical staff, risk managers
Private Sector Data Collection, continued
Harvard’s Malpractice Insurers Medical Error Prevention and Surveillance Study Funded by AHRQ (David Studdert, Principal Funded by AHRQ (David Studdert, Principal
Investigator)Investigator) 6 multi-hospital insurers nationwide, including CRICO6 multi-hospital insurers nationwide, including CRICO ““Reports” are closed malpractice claims (nReports” are closed malpractice claims (n≈2,040) in ≈2,040) in
4 clinical areas 4 clinical areas Record reviews conducted by specialist physiciansRecord reviews conducted by specialist physicians
1. Adverse Event Reporting
Reporters:Reporters:Risk managers (difficult)Risk managers (difficult)Nurses (good – 60% in UHC)Nurses (good – 60% in UHC)Pharmacists (good – 29% in UHC)Pharmacists (good – 29% in UHC)Physicians (very difficult – 2% in UHC)Physicians (very difficult – 2% in UHC)
What to collect?What to collect?Medical injuriesMedical injuriesNear-misses and unsafe conditionsNear-misses and unsafe conditionsOther “adverse events” – falls, fires, suicides, etc.Other “adverse events” – falls, fires, suicides, etc.Contributing factorsContributing factors
Barriers to Reporting
Legal:Legal:Tort fears – confidentiality of report dataTort fears – confidentiality of report dataHIPAAHIPAA
Practical:Practical:Cultural normsCultural normsTime / hassle factorTime / hassle factorReporting overload: Reporting overload: JCAHO, FDA, Department of JCAHO, FDA, Department of
Health, Board of Medicine, risk management, insurer, Health, Board of Medicine, risk management, insurer, peer review committee, UHC or DoctorQualitypeer review committee, UHC or DoctorQuality
2. Report Aggregation
Reporting systems vary in:Reporting systems vary in: Vocabulary and definitionVocabulary and definition Typologies of adverse events and contributing factorsTypologies of adverse events and contributing factors Range of data collectedRange of data collected
Private-sector systems collect comprehensive Private-sector systems collect comprehensive data, but have limited membershipdata, but have limited membership
State systems have State systems have Theoretically universal reporting, but substantial Theoretically universal reporting, but substantial
underreportingunderreporting Limited range of data fieldsLimited range of data fields
3. Data Analysis
Most multi-institutional systems have Most multi-institutional systems have limited capacity to conduct data analysislimited capacity to conduct data analysisStates: lack of human resources, moneyStates: lack of human resources, moneyUHC: “like that UPS commercial”UHC: “like that UPS commercial”
Partnerships with researchers emerging, Partnerships with researchers emerging, but still limitedbut still limitedOK to share data with researchers?OK to share data with researchers?Who will pay?Who will pay?
Data Analysis, continued
Moving beyond descriptive analysis is Moving beyond descriptive analysis is difficultdifficultHeterogeneity of adverse outcomes, errors, Heterogeneity of adverse outcomes, errors,
clinical conditions, institutions, and patientsclinical conditions, institutions, and patientsSmall sample sizesSmall sample sizesCase/control designs are expensive, difficult Case/control designs are expensive, difficult
to power, and pose HIPAA issues to power, and pose HIPAA issues
4. Intervention Design
Reporting institutions must receive feedback to Reporting institutions must receive feedback to maintain a stake in reportingmaintain a stake in reporting Comparative data and benchmarking are of interestComparative data and benchmarking are of interest
Types of interventions: (1) educational, (2) Types of interventions: (1) educational, (2) systems changesystems change
Clinical leadership / buy-in are essentialClinical leadership / buy-in are essential Should include an evaluation componentShould include an evaluation component Key issue: How tailored should the intervention Key issue: How tailored should the intervention
be to particular institutions?be to particular institutions?
5. Intervention Implementation
Barriers:Barriers: Identifying clinical leadersIdentifying clinical leadersGaining buy-in from busy clinicians who lack a Gaining buy-in from busy clinicians who lack a
strong stake in QIstrong stake in QIDemonstrating the value of claims & report data Demonstrating the value of claims & report data Crowding-out from other QI initiativesCrowding-out from other QI initiativesOutside of captives, no organizational structure Outside of captives, no organizational structure
to implement interventions through the insurer, to implement interventions through the insurer, or otherwise coordinate institutions/practice or otherwise coordinate institutions/practice groupsgroups
Next Steps in Building an Infrastructure for Data-Driven Patient Safety Improvement
Standardization of reporting fields and linkage of Standardization of reporting fields and linkage of data from multiple systems (reporting systems + data from multiple systems (reporting systems + quality datasets)quality datasets)
Stronger partnerships for data analysisStronger partnerships for data analysis Merging of institutional risk management and Merging of institutional risk management and
patient safety unitspatient safety units Coordinated leadership from insurers, Coordinated leadership from insurers,
institutional management, and clinical staffinstitutional management, and clinical staff Better financial incentives for patient safety Better financial incentives for patient safety
improvement (individual- and institution- level)improvement (individual- and institution- level)