Assessment criteria

Assessment criteria Case Study NURS11154 Term 2 2014Student Name:

Student Number:HD+ HD HD-D+ D D-C + C C-P+ P P-F+ F F-

Structure (15%)

Inroduction provides a clear and succinct overview of the person in the case study. (5%)Inroduction provides a clear and appropriate overview of the person in the case study.Inroduction provides an appropriate overview of the person in the case study.Overview of the case study is apparent in the introduction.No recognizable introduction that contains an overview of the person in the case study.

Clear and succinct summary that outlines the main points of the care plan to bring the paper to a close. (5%)Clear and appropriate summary that outlines main points of the care plan to bring the paper to a close.The summary provides most of the main points and brings some sense of closure to the paper. Summary provides most of the main points and endeavours to bring the case study to a close there may be some incongruity. No recognizable summary Little reference to the main points does not offer a clear sense of closure to the paper.

Consistently accurate with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation. (5%)Generally accurate with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation Occasional inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation Frequent inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation Many inaccuracies with spelling, grammar, use of punctuation

Approach & Argument (65%)

Content provides comprehensive evidence of critical thinking and decision making through the ability to clearly and adequately evaluate information to prioritise interventions within the nursing care plan. Nursing diagnoses consistantly accurate and relevant to the patient (20%)Content provides strong evidence of critical thinking and decision making through the abilty to evaluate information to prioritise interventions within the nursing care plan. Nursing diagnoses generally accurate and relevant to the patient Content provides adequate evidence of critical thinking and decision making through the show some ability to evaluate information to prioritise interventions within the nursing care plan. Nursing diagnoses occassionally accurate and relevant to the patientContent provides some evidence of critical thinking and decision making through evidencing a basic ability to evaluate informaiton to prioritise interventions within the nursing care plan. Nursing diagnoses seldom accurate and relevant to the patient No or minimal ability evidenced in the content to critical thinking or decision making through the lack of prioritisation of interventions within the nursing care plan. Nursing diagnoses consistantly inaccurate and irrelevant to the patient

Content provides strongly defined evidence based rationales for all interventions. (15%)Content provides well defined evidence based rationales for all interventions.Content provides satisfactoralily defined evidence based rationales for all interventions.Content provides passable evidence based rationales for all interventions.No or minimal evidence based rationales provided for some interventions.

Content provides a reflective and comprehensively holistic approach to the care of the person in the case study. (20%)

Content provides a reflective and deliver a strong holistic approach to the person in the case study.Content provides an abilty to be refelctive and deliver a satisfactory holistic approach to the person in the case study.Content provides a basic ability to be reflecitve and deliver a stilted holistic approach to the person in the case study.No or minimal ability to be reflective or provide an holistic approach to the person in the nursing care plan.

Content demonstrates detailed and in-depth knowledge of communication and collaborative care needs of the person in the case study

(10%) (Learning Outcome 3)Content displays knowledge of communication and collaborative care needs of the person in the case study

An attempt is made to show knowledge of communication and collaborative care needs of the person in the case study.

Basic knowledge of communication and collaborative care needs of the person in the case study demonstrated in paper

Paper demonstrated no or minimal knowledge of communication and collaborative care needs of the person in the case study

Referencing: (20%) Referencing is consistent throughout with Author-date system.Referencing is not consistent with Author-date system.

Consistently integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect all ideas, factual information and quotations. (10%)Generally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotationsFrequently integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotationsOccasionally integrates up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotationsFails to or infrequent attempts to integrate up-to-date references to support and reflect ideas, factual information and quotations

Consistently accurate with referencing. Refernece list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through an extensive reference list. All of which are used in the body of the text. (>/= 15 relevant sources) (10%)Generally accurate with referencing. Refernece list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through a ample number of refernences included on the reference list. All of which are used in the body of the text. (>/= 10 relevant sources)Occasional inaccuracies with referencing. Refernece list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through an adequate number of references included on the reference list. All of which are used in the body of the text. (>/= 7 relevant sources)Frequent inaccuracies with referencing. Refernece list adheres to APA presentation guidelines. Evidence of reading widely on the topic through a passable number of references included in the reference list. All of which are used in the body of the text. (>/= 5 relevant sources)Many inaccuracies with referencing. Refernece does not adhere to APA presentation guidelines. No evidence of reading widely on the topic through a brevity of references on the reference list. Not all of which are used in the body of the text. (< 5 relevant sources)

Comments:

Grade: %

Marker: