Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Good afternoon everybody and welcome to our Guaranteed
Income for Life seminar. I am Simon Thomas, Group CFO. I am
joined today by our presenters Hugh McKee – MD of UK Retail,
Peter Ellis, Director of Propositions, and David Cooper, Group
Marketing and Distribution Director
Today’s session is being held to discuss the emerging growth
opportunities in the GIfL market and our position within that
market. It follows a similar session we hosted back in February on
Defined Benefit. For those who have dialled in, the presentation
materials are available in the reports and presentations section of
our website justgroupplc.co.uk … also, I am obliged to advise you
that this call is being recorded
In terms of running order, I will do a brief introduction, before
handing over to my colleagues to give further detail on the drivers
and moving parts of this market and what that means for Just.
2
We’ll then have a Q&A session – there will be plenty of time for
this, so can I please ask that you save your questions until the
end.
Finally, we will be available to follow up informally over a coffee
2
GIfL is at the heart of our Group, it was the basis on which it was
founded, and still accounts for around half of our premiums and
three quarters of our overall reserves. We hope to demonstrate
that it is a segment that is very much poised for further growth
within the wider retirement income market
In 2016, the GIfL market stabilised at around £4bn, and Q1 17 ABI
stats indicate an uptick. We look forward to seeing this trend
develop further. Since 2014, there have been exits from the market
for various reasons, leaving more room for retirement specialists
like us
Just commands an 18% market share of the overall GIfL market,
and 40% of the addressable Open Market. It is the addressable
OMO which is key to our prospects. Hugh, Peter and David will
take you through this shortly
3
Since IPO and Pension Freedoms, we have diversified our
sources of premium to include DB - however GIfL provides a
steady flow of business each month, which we closely and
speedily match to our LTM origination. The stable GIfL line of
business helps to iron out the seasonal lumpiness of DB.
As the team will show, it remains an attractive growth market in its
own right, where our medical IP gives us a sustainable competitive
advantage
And with that, I’ll hand over to Hugh
3
4
Thank you Simon, good afternoon anyone. As Simon has said I
am Hugh McKee and I am the MD responsible for all UK retail
business
Today we are here to discuss the individual pension annuity
market or as refer to it now the Guaranteed Income for Life market,
GIfL for shorthand.
We are very positive about the future of this market and of the
continued major contribution that we believe it will make to the
bottom line of JUST.
Why ?
Because of the favourable trends we see emerging.
The market is going to grow. It has stabilised post Pension
5
Freedoms and will now grow supported by demographics and
regulatory trends.
There are also new sources of business still to come along and
other sources which are up and running and developing and for
which there is a strong future.
And JUST is well positioned to benefit. We are leaders and prime
players in this market and we have already shown that we can
generate strong profits.
During the next half hour or so we will expand on all of these
aspects and explain our thinking.
As Simon has said, there will be plenty of time for questions and I
look forward to a vibrant discussion
5
Before we look specifically at the GIfL market we should look at
the overall market of which it is a part.
We should also consider the changes in behaviour that we have
seen from individuals in the UK over the last few years – and
contemplate what we expect in the future.
Looking at these two areas will put our subsequent comments on
GIfL in context.
Historically, individuals worked until a fixed retirement age and at
that point completely stopped working. They then lived off a
combination of employer sponsored pensions (many of them
defined benefit) and the State Pension. Pension benefits weren’t
flexible in any significant aspects, particularly timing, other than for
those who were better off financially.
6
Now many individuals ‘retire’ on a staged basis over a
period. They do fewer hours, reduce their days or switch to a
different role which is less stressful or carries less
responsibility. This shifts the work/life balance as they prepare for
retirement. It also supplements their income and delays the point
at which they need to start drawing down on their pension savings.
These changes started long before Pensions Freedoms but what
the Freedoms have done is help align the legal and tax framework
with how individuals wish to manage their finances in this phase of
their lives.
Our focus today is the situation we see in the market as the post
Freedoms world settles down and as we see patterns emerging.
Pre Freedoms most individuals with defined contribution pension
savings bought a GIfL when they retired. Drawdown existed but
was largely the preserve of the well off. The option to fully cash in
didn’t exist except for very small funds.
Now individuals make their decisions over the two decades from
ages 55 to 75 and inevitably their needs, financial status, capability
and attitude to risk can move significantly over such an extended
timescale.
Looking at market statistics they show that in 2016 a phenomenal
£18billion (net of tax free cash) transferred into drawdown or GIfL
products or was withdrawn as cash. Of that GIfL amounted to
£4.3billion, a substantial market and an increase over the figure for
2015. We believe that this shows that the market has stabilised
post freedoms and various reasons which we’ll go on to cover we
believe we will see growth in the market in the years ahead
6
I’d like to deal with one of the oft quoted but incorrect or misleading
statistics about the ‘at retirement’ market post freedoms – an
aspect which relates to full cash withdrawals.
It is correct to say that more than half of pension savings cases are
fully withdrawn. Also that the remaining cases are split 2/3 to 1/3
between drawdown and GIfL.
However, if you look at the more important money flows data the
position is quite different.
Just under one quarter of pensions savings is taken as cash
withdrawals, almost exactly the same amount as purchases GIfL.
Clearly this is because it is the smaller cases where full cash
withdrawal is most prevalent. Indeed 60% of cases fully withdrawn
were below £10k and 90% were below £30k.
7
Since freedoms we have seen the average case size for GIfL
purchases grow by more than 50% due to the loss of many of the
smaller cases and also due to attracting larger cases but more of
that later
7
A further misconception is that transfers to drawdown products
only happen at the point of retirement.
Clearly this is true in some cases but as you can see from the
graph more than 40% of people transferring to drawdown are
below age 60 and nearly ¾ are below age 65. The amounts
analysis indicates that these drawdown investments are not large
enough to support the drawing of any meaningful retirement
income from those ages.
So this is what leads to the zero income drawdown
phenomenon. Individuals transferring to drawdown to release their
tax free cash but not yet drawing an income from their pensions
savings. Indeed with no intention of drawing an income for many
years to come.
By contrast GIfL is a product which is only purchased at the point
8
of wishing to start an income and therefore the age profile of
purchasers reflects much more accurately when individuals wish to
start drawing their pension. The statistics show clearly that this is
a substantially older age profile than invests in drawdown. Less
than half of GIfL purchases are made by people under 65 with the
spike coming in the age range 65-69, indeed GIfL sales exceed
those of Drawdown for this key segment.
We believe that over time we will see movement of funds from
drawdown to GIfL when people wish to start drawing an
income. And the analysis of drawdown case size shows that 2/3
of the money lies in cases which are in prime GIfL buying
country. Drawdown is no longer a rich man’s product for
managing their pension funds throughout retirement and we
believe it will be a staging place for future GIfL purchase.
This will be supplemental to today’s market as the post freedoms
world hasn’t existed long enough yet for it to be part of our current
sales. So an opportunity for the future
8
A requirement for this opportunity to become a reality will be
customer preference. Our research has shown that more than half
of individuals with a pensions pot between £50k and £500k want to
use some or all of that fund to purchase a guaranteed income.
At JUST we are completely focussed on the retirement phase. We
research it heavily to ensure that we understand changing
preferences and thinking amongst those at that stage of their
lives. In our analysis we segment the population into various
categories dependent on their attitudes and the current slide
shows the key finding from a recent survey of more than 3,000
individuals.
The headline is that in each category more than half of
respondents said that they would use some or all of their pension
funds to secure a guaranteed income.
9
This supports our view that pension funds going into drawdown
pre retirement will at least partially be used to purchase GIfL at
retirement.
I’d now like to handover to Peter Ellis who is the Proposition
Director responsible for GIfL
9
Thanks Hugh. Good afternoon, I’m Peter Ellis, the Director of
Propositions for the Retail Business at Just.
10
The structural drivers of growth in the defined contribution pension
market are strong – and, as I’ll show you in my presentation, we
are confident this will help to drive growth in our core GIfL market.
As you can see from the chart, overall assets held in Defined
Contribution pension schemes are projected to rise consistently
over the next decade.
This growth is driven by both:
• the closure of defined benefit pension schemes and
replacement by DC schemes; and
• The increase in the volume of people joining workplace
pension schemes as a result of the continued rollout of the
government’s auto-enrolment programme, and the increase in
contribution levels that will be triggered by the government over
time.
11
So the speed at which the accumulation bucket is being filled will
increase. And that means that over time, as the tap is turned on,
the value that will flow out into retirement income products will
increase too.
This outflow, or decumulation as we like to call it, is forecast to
reach around £30bn in 2020, and is in part supported by a
continued growth in this period, in the number of people who are
aged between 50-64.
So in summary DB pension scheme economics, government
policy and demographics are positive forces supporting growth in
the retirement income market.
11
So the top left chart shows the total GIfL market was around
£4.3bn in 2016, a small increase over 2015.
As you can see in the right hand chart, our addressable market,
the size of the external market, was £1.9bn, an increase of 11%
compared to the 2015.
The remaining £2.3bn is sold internally by pension companies to
their existing customers.
Over the course of our presentations today we’ll show why we
believe more of this internal business will be transacted in the
external market going forwards.
In the bottom left chart you will see the rollercoaster ride of OMO.
Before the pension freedoms announcement in the 2014 Budget,
12
significant progress was being made to increase the proportion of
business written via the Open Market.
An unintended consequence of freedoms was that the OMO
proportion dropped sharply. This was clearly a setback in terms of
our ambition to see a GIfL market that is fully open.
However since then, the ratio has started to rebuild and we are
confident this trend will continue – and as I mentioned we’ll set out
our reasons for this today.
12
As some of you will have heard us describe before, over a number
of years the industry conduct regulator, the FCA, has undertaken a
number of market investigations and made changes to conduct
rules in relation to the retirement income market.
The motivation behind these changes have been to achieve two
outcomes
– improve competition, and
- to achieve better consumer protection.
This work is still ongoing, and the range of active interventions
made by the regulator has been increasing.
A good example of a recent intervention - announced only a few
weeks ago - is a requirement for companies to provide customers
with what’s called ¬- an “information prompt” – it’s a comparison
that shows the customer the best rate in the market and how that
13
compares with the offer made by the incumbent provider.
This comparison is designed to encourage people to access the
better deals available in the external market by showing in pounds
and pence what they are losing by accepting the offer from their
current firm.
Our Hub Financial Solutions business is delivering technology
solutions to help life companies meet the new requirements from
the FCA. David Cooper will talk more about Hub later.
We obviously support the FCA’s work in this area – the outcome
should result in increasing numbers of people accessing better
deals available from the open market from companies such as
Just.
13
This chart is one of the most important we will present today, so I’d
like to spend some time walking you through it. It shows our view
on the sources of growth driving the increase in the external GIfL
market up to 2020.
Our base case is the market will grow to around £2.9bn – but we
also think there is potential upside beyond this figure.
So let me step through each source:
<click>
Firstly demographics – I think I’ve covered this earlier in sufficient
detail – DC replacing DB, auto-enrolment and positive
demographics. The variation around the base case arises from the
uncertain timeline of government policy implementation around
auto-enrolment and any potential reforms to DB pensions.
<click>
14
Secondly - We have ascribed a value to something Hugh
mentioned earlier, those people using drawdown in their mid-50’s
to early-60’s , taking their tax free cash but leaving their money
invested without taking an income as they continue working. We
believe significant proportions of these people, when they decide
later in life how to generate a retirement income, will choose to
secure some guaranteed income via a GIfL product.
It’s also worth noting that beyond 2020, we expect this value to
increase markedly year-on-year, as more people reach ages
where they require a secure income. The variability around the
base case arises because this is a relatively new phenomenon –
and we will adjust our thinking as we observe how consumers
behave and how the FCA intervenes.
<click>
Number 3, GAR – or Guaranteed Annuity Rate commitments – I’m
going to cover this in detail on the next slide;
<click>
And number 4 – DB transfers – these are individuals who are
choosing to transfer their DB pensions into individual DC
arrangements. I have a slide to cover this in some detail too.
<click>
And finally number 5 – Life companies. As you know some Life
Companies have or are changing their business models. For
some, that means no longer making their GIfL products available
in the open market, for others it results in a broking solution being
introduced to provide a wider choice – and better value deals – to
their existing customers. The latter change will increase flows of
business into the external GIfL market. The variability around the
base case results from the pace at which those remaining life
companies accept – what we judge to be an inevitability – that all
business will be individually underwritten – and therefore those
businesses that don’t have the capability to compete – will
introduce broking solutions for their customers.
<Click>
14
Taking all 5 of these sources – we believe there could be potential
upside of up-to £2bn – beyond our base case.
Making the range £2.9-£4.9bn. Now just to be clear – we aren’t
forecasting a £4.9bn market. We are confident that the flows in
the dark bars to create the £2.9b base case are robust, and the
lighter bars are potential upsides – dependent upon the pace of
change adopted by life companies, government and individual
consumer behaviours. This pace of change is particularly relevant
to sources 3 & 5 where cut-through is reliant on changes in
approach by more incumbent providers and for some of these
companies, a deeper level of customer engagement than has
likely gone before.
I’ll now look at source 3 and 4 in some detail.
<click>
14
Part of the GIfL market, GARs, had not been considered
accessible by companies such as Just. These contracts were
written in a period of much higher interest rates - so in today’s
environment many are extremely generous.
However some of these provider firms no longer want to write
longevity business. Instead these firms are actively securing a
GIfL from the external market to match the GAR terms offered to
their customers.
We have made strong progress growing this relatively new
opportunity. Indeed 15% of our sales to-date in 2017 are from
these GAR deals, this is up from 8% in 2016.
GAR solutions are driving growth in the external market and are
valuable sources of business for the Just Group, many of which
have been enabled through our HUB Financial Solutions business.
15
Next individual transfers from DB schemes. As you may have
read – this is an activity that has been growing exponentially since
pension freedoms was introduced in 2015. Mercer, the employee
benefit consultancy, published analysis last week, stating that
£50bn has been paid to some 210,000 members of company-
backed, defined benefit pension schemes, since April 2015.
We think there are legitimate reasons why some people benefit
from making these transfers and expect this activity will continue.
For example – a DB scheme member may have no spouse, may
have medical conditions or lifestyle factors shortening their life
expectancy or have a need to provide death benefits better than
those available in the DB scheme. Reconfiguring those benefit
structures by using the DC environment may – in many
circumstances – deliver better value for the individual. Of
relevance to the GIfl market is that when some people transfer
their benefits they are using a proportion of their funds to purchase
16
an open market GIfL product to replace the guaranteed income
they would have received from their DB scheme. Other customers
transferring out of their DB scheme prior to retirement, are
expected to purchase GIfL when their employment ceases.
Again we estimate that 15% of our sales to-date in 2017 have
arisen from this source. This is a relatively new and valuable
source of business for the Group and we forecast continued
growth which could be very significant if the consideration
(inclusion) of GIfL is adopted as best practice.
16
So, we’ve looked at the forces driving growth in the DC pension
market, the regulatory interventions improving competition and
consumer protection – and the sources of growth for our
addressable GIfL market.
I’m now going to focus on showing you why we are confident of the
Group’s capabilities to succeed in continuing to drive disciplined,
profit growth.
So – how do we win – how have we created competitive
advantage?
17
We have unrivalled, proprietary, intellectual property that enables
the Group to prioritise the most profitable risks that we want to
write.
We have four building blocks that together deliver our IP driven
competitive advantage:
• Firstly, Our data. We have more of it and its better quality than
our competitors. We have 2.3 million person years of data and
that’s growing at over 30,000 person years per month. And as
importantly we have captured over 250 rating factors for each life.
Collected it – stored it – processed it - and used it to make better
decisions.
• Secondly, Our people – we have a group of highly talented
people led by our medical director, Dr Tim Crayford. These people
are drawn from a wide range of disciplines from across the globe
• Thirdly, PrognoSysTM – this is the system we have developed
18
to take all of our data, research and insights and codify it into
software that enables us to price GIfL and other longevity
products.
• And finally the technology, that enables our eco-system of
actuarial systems and customer pricing engines to operate
seamlessly, delivering rapid automated pricing to our business
partners and customers.
When you boil it all down – our IP enables us to win in the market
by forecasting longevity better – which gives investors confidence
in the quality of our earnings – because we are able to set our
reserves more accurately; and
We can be more agile and sophisticated in establishing our new
business pricing – choosing how best to compete and generate
profitable sales within our capital budget
18
However, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Many of you
will have seen us use this slide before to demonstrate how our IP
is performing.
Obviously our pricing and reserving reflects the characteristics of
our own customer base, not just the general population trends.
Clearly we have a bias to unhealthy lives, which our medical
underwriting allows us to price competitively. Shorter lives results
in quicker confirmation of actual mortality and a richer dataset. Our
proprietary IP enables accurate longevity estimates at the outset
and is invaluable in risk selection
This slide compares the actual deaths we experienced compared
to our current IFRS reserving basis.
We consistently reserve for 10% fewer deaths than we actually
expect
19
The pink bars represent actual deaths and the grey bars represent
expected deaths. As you can see, actual deaths have been higher
than the current reserving basis in every year. The thick black line
on the chart shows the ratio between the two. It is comfortably in
excess of 100% each year which translates into IFRS mortality
profits. This margin for prudence will gradually emerge through the
in-force profit line
Furthermore, our understanding of the life expectancy of our
customers is constantly improving. Our mortality experience has
become more stable, and our estimates more certain as the
volume of in force business has grown year by year. This is shown
by the dotted blue lines which shows the 95% confidence intervals
around our observed experience, and a similar picture applies to
narrowing confidence intervals around our best estimate
assumptions.
In other words our commanding lead on data and IP gives us a
competitive advantage. As well as allowing us to price risks more
accurately, it improves our reserving accuracy leading to robust
profits.
The IP also allows us to negotiate better reinsurance terms –
reinsurers can take comfort from the size and accuracy of the IP
19
We use our IP, together with our reinsurance and capital models to
establish our technical prices. We then examine over 500
benchmark, pricing points covering key ages, conditions and
benefit structures.
We then consider the market & competitive environment ie the
volume and value of quotes being requested at any point in time.
We then set prices to achieve the margins to deliver our profit and
capital usage targets.
And as we have explained previously – we also give consideration
to the relative opportunity to acquire business through our DB
channel.
So the process is dynamic – but always disciplined.
As you’ve heard us say before and will say again no doubt later –
20
growing the Open Market - and growing our access to this market -
gives us the ability to be increasingly selective in the business we
choose to compete for.
20
This chart shows you a typical distribution of margins for a portfolio
of new business in the current market environment
What this shows is that we will write a small proportion of business
at lower margins, a proportion of business at very attractive
margins, with the rump of business being written on good, solid
margins.
Now, let me try and demonstrate what we mean by pricing
discipline in a dynamic market.
Based on the earlier prediction of a c.50% increase in the size of
the Open Market over the next 4 years, let’s consider 2 scenarios:
Firstly, we could, as indicated by the Green line, grow our own
volumes in line with this market growth, and all other things being
equal, would achieve a similar shape of margin distribution for this
larger portfolio of written business, or alternatively……
21
…… be even more selective in the business we seek to win, as
indicated by the Black line, taking the risks we really we prefer to
write from this increased pool.
This would serve to combine profit growth - with improved IRR.
Just to be clear we will focus on winning this business ^^ rather
than this business^^
I hope this demonstrates the combined value of two of our key
objectives, i.e. growing the accessible (OMO) market, and the
careful deployment of our IP led, risk selection capability, and how
we use them to deliver against our key financial targets.
I’m now going to hand you over to David Cooper to continue to
theme of How We Win.
21
Thanks Pete, Good afternoon everyone, I’m David Cooper.
22
Continuing with the theme of How We Win, I am going to cover the
wider aspects of our business that together, ensure that we lead
the market and secure the best outcomes for consumers and
shareholders alike.
By focusing on both the customer and the partner through which
we access them, we have built an operating model that uniquely
delivers to the needs of later life.
I’d like to start firstly with our brand. It is a new brand as you will
have observed, but very much draws on the positive heritage that
both previous businesses had toward the consumer. Rather than
talk about the brand I think that this internally produced video,
which features a range of target customers, will help you get a
sense of where our brand will be positioned. The people in this
video are stating their real concerns about and ambitions for
retirement. They are not actors and are not using scripts
23
VIDEO
Our brand embodies the trust that both customers and business
partners have put in us for more than two decades. We have
accumulated over ½ million customers and have had many loyal
partners work with us for all of the time.
You will see that the people in the video are younger than you
might have expected. This reflects the changing landscape and
the fact that post freedoms people are thinking about their
retirement plans much earlier than before. They know they have
options and that they should plan. They struggle to find brands that
will help them and that is where Just fits in with information,
guidance and signposting.
Secondly, for our scale, we are uniquely focused on the retiree.
Virtually every activity of the Group relates to a consumer who is
either facing their retirement years or currently experiencing them.
We are not distracted by other phases of life and the issues that
are specific to them. We know the importance at an individual
consumer level of getting retirement right – and the dire
consequences of not.
Our partners and distribution channels are also unique in the world
of retirement provision. I will come onto this in more detail shortly.
We put open markets ahead of tied solutions and were one of the
first groups to offer the products of our competitors through our
distribution activities.
We have always put technology at the heart of our processes even
though in many instances the customer isn’t exposed to it – rather
we enable our highly trained customer service teams to deliver our
operations in a customer friendly form.
Technology and innovation will continue to feature and we expect
to reveal more in this space in the near future, with newer younger
customers now willing to utilise more remote solutions to aid their
journeys into retirement.
23
Finally, as Pete outlined, individual underwriting is central to many
of our commercial activities and customer solutions, but as you
have heard it is not all that we do to differentiate and attract
partners and customers.
23
I mentioned that Just is unique. Here we see the competitive
landscape for GIfL following the relatively recent withdrawal of
Prudential, Standard Life and LV.
We are one of the largest providers of GIfL and the largest writer in
the open and accessible markets.
Our underwriting depth and breadth – by this I mean, the extent of
our active underwriting risk factors and the amount of data that we
have supporting them, is the most extensive in the market.
We are able to deploy this via a variety of technological enabled
solutions including powering intermediary portals, our own partner
solutions for the likes of Phoenix and Royal London and through
bespoke capabilities such as that utilised by Hargreaves
Lansdown.
24
We do not have vesting customers from accumulation products
and therefore focus completely on attracting new customers using
price, service and ease-of-access to win.
As this slide shows we have the most comprehensive and focused
business in GIfL and indeed the wider retirement market place.
24
Turning now to distribution. This has changed beyond almost all
recognition over the past 3-4 years - courtesy of a combination of
RDR and Pension Freedoms.
We have seen a dramatic drop in the amount of GIfL sales that
emanate from full financial planning undertaken by traditional
intermediaries. Four years ago this segment generated 63% of all
sales, now it has dropped to 31%.
We continue to work with networks, marketing group and other
directly authorised advisory firms to help them formulate new ways
of working with consumers for whom GIfL is the right answer – the
right answer for either all of retirement funds or for part of them.
We have a number of new ideas in this space, one of which I will
cover shortly.
To offset this, specialist intermediaries, those that advise
25
specifically on decumulation or retirement income needs have
grown in their importance. The likes of Age Partnership and My
Pension Expert together with the specialist planning desks of
Hargreaves Lansdown and SJP have grown in their importance in
the provision of GIfL.
Finally, we have our own distribution channels, either where we
wholly own the channel including the help, guidance or advice or
where we power the staff of a partner organisation via our
technology. You will see shortly how this has grown dramatically in
importance. These closely managed capabilities, now generate
27% of GIfL sales, up 200% from 3 years ago and growing.
25
I have mentioned our service proposition on a number of
occasions. Here I will briefly cover what we deliver and how we
measure it. Our service delivery is focused both on the
partner/intermediary and the end consumer.
We have deployed technology to ensure that we can quote
accurately, in real time, for virtually any combination of medical
conditions or lifestyle factors.
We use the Origo Options transfer services to complete business
as fast as practically possible. We know that this focus means that
the customer gets their income set up and paid quickly, that the
intermediary gets their agreed remuneration settled and
conversely, that extensive delays will not be good for the
reputation of the open market.
We continue to invest in technology to improve both customer
26
journeys and distributor experience. We are doing this to help
rebuild interest in GIfL again, particularly with traditional
intermediaries
26
Here we see evidence of our continuous pursuit of service
excellence – in this example with intermediaries. As intermediaries
become more and more focused toward their ‘on platform’
solutions, it is critical that any capabilities or products that they
need to rely on which are off platform, are as slick and easy to use
as possible.
These awards are voted for by intermediaries and I think you’ll
agree that they speak for themselves. We believe that a
succession of awards of this nature and of this standing is
unprecedented amongst retirement providers.
27
I said that I would return to our own distribution.
Hub Financial Solutions is made up of what we previously knew as
Just Retirement Solutions and TOMAS, or The Open Market
Annuity Service.
We have been building this capability for over a decade with the
dual objectives of growing the markets in which we operate, and
also defending our reach in the event that traditional third party
distribution ceased to support our objectives.
I think it’s fair to say that Hub, has come of age – I’ll show you why
I’m saying this in a moment.
Through its technology we are powering the majority of UK life
assurers who either want to outsource their at-retirement and in-
retirement processes, or those that have chosen to insource our
28
technology to achieve this themselves.
Through the Prudential, Royal London - which includes GAR
business that Pete covered, Phoenix, Standard Life and Zurich, we
are enabling maturing pension customers to get the very best GIfL
for their individual circumstances.
We also offer a fund solution alongside GIfL to aid those that wish
to split their income sources between guaranteed and flexible.
These same services are also offered to Employee Benefit
Consultants and Trustees of DC occupational schemes. We are
currently providing these services to 1-in-5 of the FTSE 100’s DC
pension schemes.
Hub currently employs around 150 staff and we believe is the
largest distributor of GIfL solutions in the UK.
We will continue to invest in HUB particularly in partner
capabilities, customer engagement and experience, and customer
handing technology to both grow its scale and effectiveness.
28
I mentioned that HUB Financial Solutions has come of age. The
left hand chart shows that not only are GIfL sales through this
channel running at twice the base level shown – that base is 2013,
the period before Freedoms were ever mentioned and when GIfL
was the default option for the vast majority of retirees.
This chart also shows that HUB now handles around 1-in-6 open
market GIfL purchases in the UK as measured by premium
income.
The right hand chart shows that we are scaling the business
effectively. Despite volumes more than doubling the headcount
supporting the channel has grown, but by only 20 heads or so, or
by around 15% from the baseline shown.
This is a result of the increasing use of technology at all points in
the customer journeys.
29
Finally you can see from the timeline at the bottom of the chart,
that the number of important partners, the lifeblood of HUB,
continues to grow substantially. I am delighted to say that I fully
expect this growth to continue as more and more organisations
and Trustee bodies see the benefits of using a B2B2C business
built specifically to serve their retirees.
29
Earlier I mentioned a new development. This is a development
that is aimed at encouraging the large number of wealth managers
that look after pension assets, but who do not access GIfL
solutions either at all or very infrequently, to reconsider their
approaches
I mentioned platform use earlier and the understandable trend for
an intermediary to wish to manage all of their affairs - and those of
their clients - through such utilities. Put simply for many advisors if
it doesn’t work through their platform and all that is connected to it,
then it probably will not get used.
So in conjunction with specialist technology business we have
devised a way of including GIfL - as an asset within a SIPP - on a
platform. We are hoping to bring this to market next year, ideally in
conjunction with some of the previously mentioned competitors in
order to create a reputable efficient market place.
30
The GIfL will be accessible on platform, have a value attributed to
it for tracking purposes, and will enable income to paid gross into
the platform’s cash account. This has obvious income tax planning
applications, especially for mid to high-net-worth customers.
We hope to be able to tell you more about this exciting
development as the project progresses, but presently we are
working with our technology partner, a handful of platforms and
advisors in order to shape this in a way that it will be readily
adoptable.
That brings me to an end and our session to an end. I will now
hand you back to Simon to summarise and to open up Q&A.
30
Thank you David,
A few concluding remarks, and then we will open up to Q&A – we
believe the structural drivers of GIfL are in place and that after a
period of stabilisation, there are opportunities for selective growth.
As ever - our focus is not on absolute sales levels, but on
maintaining discipline and focusing on new business margins, IRR
and profitability.
As you have seen from our Q1 2017 trading statement on 18 May,
NB margins are now expected to exceed the mid 6% level, and
with broadly comparable margins on both DB and GIfL, our
observation is that the GIfL price increases implemented after the
introduction of Solvency II have largely stuck. With attractive
growth opportunities in both of our main markets, we are able to be
to be more selective, picking the more profitable opportunities, and
31
indeed - not picking certain risks
And with that, we’ll open up to Q&A
Question from the floor
Operator – any questions on the line?
And with that, we will bring today’s session to a close, and we
would be delighted to join us for a coffee
31
32
33
34
35