MARKETI NG CHANGES IN FEDERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS: … · 2011. 2. 9. · Mr. Myron R. McKinley Market Administrator 800 Roosevelt Road Building A, Suite 200 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

MARKETI NG CHANGES IN FEDERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS:

A Farm-Level Analysis of Milk Diversion Program

Participants and Non-Participants

Part II: January 1984-March 1985 April-June 1985 Preliminary

Federal Milk Market Administrators Research Paper No. 2

October 1985

PREFACE

The information in this report was compiled and analyzed at the Of fice

of the Market Administrator, New York-New Jersey Milk Marketing Area, in

cooperation with the Dairy Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, United

States Department of Agriculture (AMS-USDA).

All Federal Milk Market Administrators provided information for this

study.

Copies of this report may be obtained from the Market Administrators

or the Dairy Division, AMS-USDA (see next page for addresses).

Mr. W. Joe Albright Market Administrator 5501 N. 19th Avenue, Suite 230 Phoenix, AZ 85015

Mr. Richard E. Arnold Market Administrator P.O. Box 470563 Tulsa, OK 74147

Mr. Marvin A. Baumer Market Administrator 2684 W. Eleven Mile Road Berkley, MI 48072

Mr. Chapman E. Dunham Market Administrator P.O. Box 29529 Dallas, TX 75229

Mr. C. Mack Endsley Market Administrator P.O. Box 29226 Columbus, OH 43229

Mr. Paul W. Halnon Market Administrator P.O. Box 4790 Winter Park, FL 32793

Mr. Myron R. McKinley Market Administrator 800 Roosevelt Road Building A, Suite 200 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Mr. Dormal Newberry Market Administrator P.O. Box 49025 Atlanta, GA 30359

Dr. Donald R. Nicholson Market Administrator P.O. Box 1485 Maryland Heights, MO 63043

- 2 -

Mr. Aaron L. Reeves Market Administrator 4570 W. 77th Street, Suite 210 Minneapolis, MN 55435

Mr. Frank Sheckarski Market Administrator P.O. Box 23606 Portland, OR 97223

Mr. Joseph D. Shine Market Administrator P.O. Box 710 Alexandria, VA 22313

Mr. Arnold M. Stallings Market Administrator P.O. Box 18030 Louisville, KY 40218

Mr. Thomas A. Wilson Market Administrator 708 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017

Mr. Robert D. \vright Market Administrator P.O. Box 4606 Overland Park, KS 66204

Mr. Herbert E. Shepard Market Administrator P.O. Box 1478 Boston, MA 02205

Mr. Joel L. Blum Deputy Director Dairy Division Agricultural Marketing Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Washington, DC 20250

- 3 -

ABSTRACT

Market Administrators in Federal milk marketing orders combined their

records with Milk Diversion Program (MDP) information provided by the

Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service in order to analyze

marketing changes on individual dairy farms. This report, the second in a

series, contains information for the five quarters of the program (January

1984-March 1985) and preliminary information for the first post-diversion

quarter (April-June 1985).

Monthly Federal order marketing records for over one hundred thousand

farms, representing approximately 60 percent of total United States milk

marketings, were compiled and analyzed for this study. ASCS diversion

contracts were used to divide farms into two groups: farms with a signed

diversion contract to reduce marketings (MDP participants) and farms which

chose not to participate (non-participants). Three comparisons were done:

1983 marketings versus the base period (1981/82) marketings; 1984/85 versus

the base period; and 1984/85 versus 1983/84.

Prior to the Milk Diversion Program, MDP participants had a much

greater tendency to reduce marketings. Between the base period and 1983,

approximately two-thirds of participants decreased marketings. The

inverse was true for non-participants; apppoximately two-thirds of this

group increased marketings in 1983 relative to the base period.

Many farms chose not to participate despite incurring 1983 marketing

declines of 5 percent or more, i.e., declines sufficient to qualify them

for diversion payments with no additional declines needed. Approximately

18,000 farms in the study had decreased marketings more than 5 percent in

1983 relative to their base period. However, only one-third of this group

(6,326 farms) chose to participate in the program. The participation rate

of the MDP-qualifying group was especially low in the northern Federal

Orders.

During the 15 months of the program, MDP participants decr eased

marketings an average of 25.8 percent below their base-period levels.

It is estimated that about 98 percent of all participants had marketings

within contract levels.

Large numbers of non-participants also reduced marketings between the

base period and the 1984/85 MDP period. During each quarterly period, in

fact, the number of non-participants with marketing declines of five

- 4 -

percent or more ("qualifying non-participants") exceeded the number of

participants for all Orders combined. These qualifying non-participants

lost out on substantial payments by not participating. For the Orders

examined, 15,533 qualifying non-participants had 2.1 billion pounds of

qualifying declines with a potential MDP payment value of $211 mil l ion.

This represents an average loss of $13,600 per farm. Extrapolating on a

national basis, payments to qualifying non-participants could have cos t the

government an additional 400-500 million dollars in MDP costs without any

additional marketing declines being incurred.

MDP participants decreased marketings substantially during each

quarter of the program relative to the same quarter a year earlier.

However, because of marketing declines incurred by this group in 1983, the

rate of decline in most quarters was 3 to 6 percentage points below the

ra te of decline experienced relative to the base period. In the final

quarter of the program (January-March 1985), participants decreased

marketings only 9.1.percent because this quarter was being compared with

the ·same quarter a year earlier (January-March 1~84), a quarter in which

participants had already attained significant marketing declines.

Non-participants played a surprisingly large role in year-to-year

declines in U.S. marketings incurred during the last four quarters of the

MDP period. Non-part!cipants increased marketings one percent or less in

the second and fifth quarters of the program and actually decreased

marketings during the third and fourth quarters. In all MDP quarters but

the first, the majority of non-participants decreased marketings compared

to the previous year and in every quarter, the marketing decliIles for

"decreasing" non-participants were larger in volume than the declines for

all participants.

Preliminary data for the first quarter of the post-diversion period

(April-June 1985) indicates that most MDP participants (almost

three-fourths) began to increase marketings after the program. For all

participants, the average increase relative to April-June 1984 was 15.1

percent.

Non-participants as a group increased marketings 4.3 percent in the

April-June 1985 period relative to last year. During this first

post-diversion quarter, nop.-participants were responsible for substan t ially

greater marketing increases (volume basis) than were participants.

~

- 5 -

INTRODUCTION

After five consecutive years of increases, United States (U.S.) milk

marketings decreased 3.6 percent in 1984. U. S. marketings continued to

decline during the first quarter of 1985, although the rate of decline fell

to 1.0 percent. This period of decline coincides with, and has often been

attributed to, the Milk Diversion Program (MDP) which was authorized by the

"Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983." Under this program, dairy

farmers could contract with the government to reduce their milk marke t ings

for the period January 1, 1984-March 31, 1985 by at least five percent , but

not more than thirty percent, from their marketing level in a comparable

period of 1981 and/or 1982 (the base period). They would receive payment

for the amount of reduction on the basis of $10 per hundredweight provided

their contract requirement was fulfilled.

While 37,757 dairy farmers did contract to reduce production (MDP

participants), they only represented about twenty percent of all commercial

dairy farms. The remaining eighty percent chose not to participate

(non-participants).

I t is important to analyze the changes in marke tings which occurred

for each of these groups of dairy farmers during the 15 months of the

, diversion program and thereafter. This study attempts such an analysis

using monthly marketing records of farms delivering milk to handlers

regulated under Federal milk marketing orders. Part I of the study was

released in February 1985 and compared the first three quarterly periods

(and the nine-month period) of 1984 with the same periods in 1983 and the

base period (1981/82). This report (Part II) includes an overall

comparison of the five MDP quarters relative to the same quarters in the

previous year and the same quarters in the base period. Selected

cumulative data for annual 1984 and the fifteen-month 11DP period (January

1984-March 1985) is also presented. In addition, preliminary data for the

first quarter of the post-diversion period (April-June 1985) is presented.

Since Part I of the study was released, some additional data

concerning the January-September 1984 period has become available. This

updated information is presented in the Appendix tables.

A further analysis of the twelve-month period (April 1, 1985-March 31,

1986) following the end of the diversion program is planned.

- 6 -

METHODOLOGY

The methodology used in this report is the same as that which was used

in Part I. The study examined marketing changes (for individual producers)

that occurred between a recent quarterly (three-month) time period and two

comparison periods: same quarter a year earlier and same quarter during the

base period. The five quarterly periods during which the Milk Diversion

Program was in effect constituted the study period. These quarterly

periods cover the four quarters of 1984 (January-March, April-June,

July-September, and October-December) and· the first quarter of 1985

(January-March).

The first report also considered

January-September 1984. This report

the nine-month cumulative period,

does limited comparisons for the

twelve-month cumulative period, January-December 1984,

fifteen-month cumulative period January 1984-March 1985.

and the

As discussed in the earlier report, there were specific criteria to

determine which producers could be included in the study group. These were

developed because of the nature of Federal milk marketing order producer

data. If a producer ceased marketing milk under a specific order sometime

during the study period, it could not be assumed that the producer ceased

production. In ·order to be included in a quarterly analysis, the producer

had to market milk in the order during at least one month in that quarter.

In order to be included in the cumulative fifteen-month analysis, the ·

producer had to have production in the last month of the cumulative period

(March 1985).

Another criterion established for including a producer in the study

was that the producer had to have Federal order marketings in at least one

of the comparison periods as well as some time during the five-quarter

1984/85 MDP period. This resulted in the · exclusion of producers who had

short marketing histories under a specific order. However, a producer did

not have to have marketing records for the entire period (1981/82 through

1984/1985) to be included in the study. Producers with 1983 information

but no base information were included in the 1983 versus 1984 comparisons

but excluded from the base period versus 1984 comparisons. In some cases

involving MDP participants, marketings reported by producers on their ASCS

contract forms were used if Federal order data was incomplete.

[

-- 7 -

ANALYSIS

The number of farms and the total milk marketings included in the

study differ according to the time period and comparison period b eing

considered. These statistics, along with the percentage of U.S. marketings

and total Federal order marketings represented by the study, are shown in

Table 1. There were 80-100 thousand commercial dairy farms represented and

they marketed, in most quarters, more than half the milk in the country. II Every significant milk production region in the United States was

represented in the study with the exception of California. There a r e no

Federal orders in that state.

The marketing history of producers prior to the implementation of the

milk diversion program appeared to be a significant factor in producers'

decisions to participate in the program. Marketing records from

approximately 13,000 participants and 57,000 non-participants, marketing 55

billion pounds of milk during 1983, were used in Table 2. Participants as

a group decreased marketings by 5.0 percent prior to the beginning of the

program, while non-participants increased marketings 6.5 percent.

Approximately two-thirds of all participants registered a decrease and the

remaining one-thfrd registered an increase. In contrast, only about

one-third of all non-participants registered a decrease while two-thirds

increased marketings.

A more detailed analysis is shown in Tables 3 and 4. Approximately

18,000 producers, or 25 percent of all producers considered, decreased

marketings more than 5 percent in 1983 relative to their base period. As

shown in Table 4, only one-third of these producers (6,326) actually

participated in the program despite marketing levels that would have

qualified them for diversion payments with no additional marketing declines

needed.

The distribution of the producers with marketing declines of over 5

percent shows that the majority of such producers in southern marketing

orders (Gecrgia, St. Louis-Ozarks, Southwest Plains, Central Arkansas,

II The numbers in Table 1 may differ from those reported in the first report because additional data has become available since that report was published.

rJ

Table 1. Number of Farms and Their Milk Marketings in Study, by Comparison Period, January 1984-March 1985

1st. Quart.er 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 5t.h Quarter 12-months 15-months (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct.-Dec) (Jan-Mar 8~) (Jan-Dec 84) (Jan 84-Mar 85)

NUfTlber of farfTlS 1981/82-1984/85 COfTlparison

Participants 18,797 18,687 18,609 18,403 16,559 17,361 16,398 Non-participants 67,626 67,993 68,222 70,735 65,060 66,975 65,371

A 11 Farms 86,423 86,680 86,831 89,138 81,619 84,336 81,769

1983/84-1984/85 Comparison Part.icipant.s 18,473 18,391 18,341 18,179 16,607 17,157 N.A. Non-participants 83,132 83,882 83,895 82,212 77,188 78,390 N.A.

A 11 Farms 101,605 102,273 102,236 100,391 93,795 95,547 N.A.

Marketings (fTlillion pounds) 1981/82-1984/85 COfTlparison

Participants 3,593 3,402 3,082 3,031 2,872 12,894 14,908 Non-participants 13,213 13,520 12,474 13,658 13,484 55,623 65,339

All Farms 16,806 16,922 15,556 16,689 16,356 68,517 80,247

1983/84-1984/85 Comparison Participants 3,486 3,304 3,005 2,954 2,886 12,569 N.A. 00

Non-participants 16,368 16,907 15,723 15,385 15,513 63,745 N.A. All FarfTlS 19,854 20,211 18,728 18,339 18,399 76,314 N.A.

Total U.S. marketings (mil. lbs.) 33,189 34,845 32,695 31,641 32,847 132,370 165,217

1981/82-1984/85 as % of U.S. 50.6 48.6 47.6 52.7 49.8 51.8 48.6

1983/84-1984/85 as % of U.S. 59.8 58.0 57.3 58.0 56.0 57.7 N.A.

Total Federal Order marketi ngs (rni l. 1 bs. ) 23,353 24,016 22,298 22,012 23,127 91,679 114,806

1981/82-1984/85 as % of total Federal Order 72.0 70.5 69.8 75.8 70.7 74.7 69.9

1983/84-1984/85 as % of tot.al Federal Order 85.0 84.2 84.0 83.3 79.6 83.2 N.A.

i'I l1 r-=:t

Table 2. MDP Participants and Non-Participants, By Change in Marketings Between the Base Period (1981/82) and 1983, Selected Federal Orders

Percentage of Farms Average Percent Change Federal Order ParticiEants Non-ParticiEants in Marketings

Decreasing Increasing Decreasing Increasing All All Non-Name No. Marketings Marketings Marketings Marketings ParticiEants Participants

New England 1 74.0 26.0 39.4 60.6 - 6.3 5.0

New York-New Jersey 2 74.2 25.8 34.3 65.7 - 6.1 8.0

Georgia 7 78.5 21.5 40.2 59.8 -10.3 13.1

Chicago Regional 30 73.1 26.9 40.0 60.0 - 5.7 2.7

Southern Michigan 40 66.3 33.7 32.8 67.2 - 5.0 6.3

Indiana 49 66.4 33.6 30.2 69.8 - 5.8 6.7

St. Louis-Ozarks 62 61. 2 38.8 27.9 72.1 - 2.6 8.4

Upper Midwest 68 68.4 31.6 38.9 61.1 - 4.3 3.1

N. Orleans-Miss. 94 81. 5 18.5 54.4 45.6 -12.6 - 1. 0

Southwest Plains 106 67.2 32.8 31.2 68.8 6.0 11.4

Central Arkansas lOB 66.5 33.5 33.1 66.9 - 5.6 12.3

Texas 126 54.0 l.6.0 19.5 80.5 + 1.8 2B.2

Rio Grande Valley 138 73.5 26.5 14.B 85.2 - 9.5 22.1

Selected Orders 69.2 30.8 36.B 63.2 - 5.0 6.5

-0

Table 3. Number of Producers and Their Milk Marketings, By Selected Changes in Marketings Between the Base Period (1981/82) and 1983, Selected Federal Orders

Market.ings Federal Order Decrease of over 5.0% Change within +/- 5.0% Increase of 5.0% or greater

No. of Total mil k No. of % of all Milk No. of % of all Milk No. of % of all Mi 1 k Name No. ~roducers volUflle ~roducers ~roducers volume ~roducers ~roducers volume E!roducers ~roducers volulfle

mi I. I bs. mil. lbs. mi 1. lbs. mi I. Ibs.

New England 6,177 4,958.8 1,682 27.2 895.7 2,195 35.6 1,948.1 2,300 37.2 2,115.0

New York-New Jersey 2 16,097 11,331 .9 3,718 23.1 1,805.1 5,347 33.2 3,869.5 7,032 43.7 5,657.3

Georgia 7 1,394 1,699.5 531 38.1 558.5 369 26.5 525.0 494 35.4 616.0

Chicago Regional 30 16,449 12,267.5 4,104 25.0 2,547.6 6,765 41.1 5,237.8 5,580 33.9 4,482.1

Southern Michigan 40 5,663 4,621.3 1,326 23.4 763.0 ' 1,895 33.5 1,626.7 2,442 43.1 2,231.6

Indiana 49 2,338 1,614.3 577 24.7 321.5 651 27.8 480.5 1 ,110 47.5 812.3

St. Louis-Ozarks 62 3,480 2,586.6 867 24.9 506.2 1,080 31.0 852.5 1,533 44.1 1,227.9

Upper Midwest 68 13,178 8,694.6 3,337 25.3 1,871.6 5,213 39.6 3,603.3 4,628 35.1 3,219.7

N. Orleans-Miss. 94 1 ,231 1,269.6 613 49.8 527.4 261 21.2 323.5 357 29.0 418.7

Southwest Plains 106 1,294 1,198.3 434 33.5 302.2 369 28.5 385.3 491 38.0 510.8

Central Arkansas 108 707 532.6 226 32.0 135.3 175 24.7 137.8 306 43.3 259.5

Texas 126 2,230 3,409.1 486 21.8 521.7 511 22.9 750.6 1,233 55.3 2,136.8

Rio Grande Valley 138 115 884.8 27 23.5 70.2 31 26.9 285.3 57 49.6 529.3

Selected Orders 70,353 55,068.9 17,928 25.5 10,826.0 24,862 35.3 20,025 . 9 27,563 39.2 24,217.0

...... 0

Table 4. Number of Milk Diversion Program Participants and Their Milk Marketings, by Selected Changes in Marketings Between the Base Period (1981/82) and 1983, Selected Federal Orders

Marketings Federal Order Decrease of over 5.0% Change within +/- 5.0% Increase of 5.0% or greater

Volume of % of all % of all % of all No. of mi lk by No. of producers No. of producers No. of producers

partici- % of all partici- partici- decreasing Milk partici- changing Milk partici- increasing Milk Name No. ~ants ~roducers ~ants ~ants b): over 5% volume ~ants within +/-5% volume ~ants b): 5% or more volume

mi 1. lbs. mi 1. 1 bs. mi 1. lbs. mi 1. 1 bs.

New England 924 15.0 885.6 497 29.5 371.0 331 15.1 411.7 96 4.2 102.9

New York-New Jersey 2 1,553 9.6 1,175.9 872 23.5 528.9 500 9.4 452.1 181 2.6 194.9

Georgia 7 456 32.7 571.4 285 53.7 337.0 116 31.4 165.9 55 11. 1 68.5

Chicago Regional 30 2,446 14.9 1,840.9 1,229 29.9 823.6 946 14.0 788.4 271 4.9 228.9

Southern Michigan 40 995 17.6 828.8 472 35.6 307.4 373 19.7 370.0 150 6.1 151.4

Indiana 49 462 19.8 343.7 228 39.5 140.3 140 21.5 126.1 94 8.5 77 .3

St. Louis-Ozarks 62 1,235 35.S. 986.9 495 57.1 313.8 459 42.5 409.4 281 18.3 263.7

Upper Midwest 68 2,740 20.8 1,840.8 1,233 36.9 728.1 1,115 21.4 835.6 392 8.5 277 .1

N. Orleans-Miss. 94 339 27.S 360.1 240 39.2 220.4 64 24.5 86.2 3S 9.8 53.5

Southwest Plains 106 S74 44.4 S2S.1 293 67.S 215.8 172 46.6 188.4 109 22.2 120.9

Central Arkansas 108 269 38.0 200.4 138 61.1 81.9 69 39.4 60.0 62 20.3 58.S

Texas 126 817 36.6 1,214.0 323 66.S 362.0 221 43.2 348.2 273 22.1 503.8

Rio Grande Vall ey 138 34 29 .6 114 . 7 21 77 .8 59.6 8 25.8 31.9 5 8.8 23.2

Selected Orders 12,844 18.3 10,888.3 6,326 35.3 4,489.8 4,514 18.2 4,273.9 2,004 7.3 2,124.6

~

~

o

- 12 -

Texas, and Rio Grande Valley) signed diversion contracts. Approxima tely

one-third (or less) of the producers in this category in the nor t hern

marketing orders (New England, New York-New Jersey, Chicago Regional,

Southern Michigan, and Upper Midwest) participated in the program.

Approximately 25,000 producers (35 percent) had 1983 marketing levels

that were within 5 percentage points of their base-period marketings; less

than one-fifth of these producers (4,514) contracted under the diversion

program. The remaining 27,500 producers (39 percent) had increased t heir

1983 marketings 5.0% or more above their base period level. Only 2,004

producers (7 percent) in this group participated in the program.

Base Period Comparisons

Milk marketing changes by participants that occurred between the base

period (1981/82) and the 1984/85 diversion period are shown in Appendix II

tables. Over ninety percent of all participants decreased marketings in

each of the five quarters. (See Table 5.) The first quarter of . the milk

diversion program appeared to be one of major adjustment for most

participants. The percentage of participants decreasing marketings was 91

percent in that quarter of the program and then rose to more tha n 95

percent in the second quarter; it stayed at, or close to, that level for

the remainder of the program. The average percentage decrease in

marketings by participants was approximately 22 percent in the first

quarter; it then escalated to more than 27 percent, the general level for

the remainder of the program.

As shown in Table 6, the majority of pa!ticipants had marketing levels

which were at, . or below, their contract level during all quarters of the

diversion program. By the second quarter of the program 80 percent of

participants were reducing marketings by at least that percentage which

would fulfill their contracts. This proportion fell slightly in the third

and fourth quarters. During the fifth quarter of the program, 75 percent

of participants were reducing marketings at contract-fulfilling levels.

Over the cumulative fifteen months of the program (January 1,

1984-March 31, 1985), 93.6 percent of the participants reduced their

marketings sufficiently. This percentage, which is much higher than that

recorded in any of the individual quarters, shows that many participants

did not consistently satisfy their contract in all quarters. Instead , they

[

- 13 -

Table 5. Average Percentage Change in Marketings for MDP Participants and the Percentage of Participants Increasing or Decreasing Marketings From the Base Period to 1984/85, By Comparison Period, Combined Orders

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

Average Percentage Change for All Participants -21.7 -27.4 -28.5 -27.5 -27.9

Percentage of Farms

Increasing Marketings 8.9 4.4 4.8 6.0 4.7

Decreasing Marketings 91.1 95.6 95.2 94.0 95.3

All Participants 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Table 6. Participants' Actual Marketing Level Relative To Their Contract Level, by Comparison Period, Combined Orders

Actual Actual greater Actual less

Comparison than at t han Eeriod contract contract contract

Eercent of all EarticiEants

First Quarter 1984 34.9 29.7 35 . 4

Second Quarter 1984 19.8 24.3 55.9

Third Quarter 1984 22.0 20.2 57.8

Fourth Quarter 1984 26.4 18.8 54.8

Fifth Quarter 1984 24.9 17.6 57.5

lS-Month Cumulative 6.4 45.8 47.8

- 14 -

decreased their marketings beyond their contract levels in some quarters so

that they could have contract-ex ceeding levels in other quarters and still

satisfy their contracts.

An important point to note is that Federal Order data suggests that

6.4 percent of all participants were in violation of their contract. This

is not necessarily the case for the following reasons. Firstly, the

computer-generated statistical tables were initially designed so that any

producer with a marketing level exactly 3.000 percent greater than his

contract would be included in a category defined as "marketings 3 to 4

percent above contract level". Once the study was underway, it was not

possible to divide this group into those participants who were exactly

3.000 percent above contract and those who were over that amount but less

than 4.0 percent. Therefore, all participants in that category were

deemed, for study purposes, to be in violation of their contract. This was

not a significant ·problem during any of the quart~rly periods. For the

cumulative fifteen-month period, however, the +3 to +4 percent category

represented almost 2 percent of all participants and a sample analysis

showed that many of these producers were exactly 3.000 percent above their

contract level. Secondly, there is probably an error factor (involving two

to three percent of all participants) resulting from the fact that some . Orders used Federal order records to determine base period marketings and

these marketings did not agree with those reported on the . contract.

Additional errors could have occurred when ASCS contract information was

coordinated with Federal order data. Producers whose base-period

marketings used in the study were slightly off could have fallen ou tside

the tight contract-satisfying requirement. Furthermore, any

non-participant who was mistakenly identified as a participant would also

probably appear to be in violation of contract under ASCS guidelines.

A cursory estimate shows that probably only about 2 percent of all

participants were actually in violation of their contract under ASCS

guidelines.

There was a large group of non-participants who decreased their

marketings 5 percent or more during the fifteen months. If -these producers

had anticipated their declines, they could have participated i n the

program. Table 7 shows the number of qualifying non-participants

(non-participants with marketing declines of five percent or greater ) and

the total number of participants for those Federal Orders where da t a for

- 15 -

all study periods was available. Qualifying non-participants exceeded

total participants in each quarter. Numerically, they ranged from 17,612

in the first quarter to 22,837 in the third quarter. For the fifteen-month

cumulative period, there were 14,610 qualifying non-participants; they

exceeded the total number of participants by over 1,000 producers.

Although the number of non-participants with marketing decline s of

five percent or greater exceeded the total number of participants, this was

not necessarily the case for the orders on an individual basis. In many of

the northern orders (including New England, New York-New Jersey, Middle

Atlantic, Chicago Regional, and Southern Michigan), qualifying

non-participants did exceed total participants. In the more southern

orders (including Georgia, Florida, Southwest Plains, Central Arkansas,

Texas. and Central Arizona), however, total participants exceeded

qualifying non-participants.

In many Orders, non-participants lost out on substantial potential

income by not participating. Table 8 shows the number of qual ifying

non-participants and the MDP payments they would have received if they had

agreed to participate. For the Orders shown, 15,533 qual i f y ing

non-participants had 2.1 billion pounds of qualifying marketing dec l ines.

These farms would have received $211 million dollars if they had agreed to

participate. No marketing declines in addition to those actually incurred

would have been needed in order to receive this payment. While these farms

could have benefited had they signed up· for the program, the gove r nment

would have suffered in terms of higher program costs. Since the farms

under the Federal Orders shown in Table 8 represented slightly less than

one-half the milk marketed in the country during the IS-month MDP period,

it would be reasonable to assume that on a national basis, potential

additional program costs could have been 400-500 million dollars more than

what was actually spent.

Lost payments averaged $13,600 per farm and ranged from $10,215 in the

New York-New Jersey area to $141,809 per farm in the Florida Orders. On a

regional basis, non-participants in the three northeast Orders (Orders Nos.

1, 2, and 4) lost $72 million in potential income and non-participants in

two midwest Orders (Orders Nos. 30 and 68) lost $62 million.

Table 7. Number of Non-Participants With Marketing Declines of Five Percent or Greater From Base Period and Total Number of MDP Participants, By Comparison Period, Selected Federal Orders

Federal Order

Name No.

New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 Kansas Cit.y, e t. al. Upper Mid~est Nashville

4 Sout.hwest. Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas

68 98

106 108 126

Central Arizona 131

Selected Orders

1st Quarter January-March 1984

Non-Participants Participants

1,148 956 3,556 1,480 1,732 702

321 446 117 173

3,806 2,446 1,023 1,014

469 459 1,406 2,368 3,058 2,740

216 422 243 578 134 254 370 790

13 45

17,612 14,873

2nd Quarter April-June 1984


number

1,868 956 4,159 1,443 2,142 684

347 449 110 172

4,626 2,446 1,268 1,014

622 459 1,493 2,287 3,225 2,740

292 422 256 578 144 254 310 804

8 45

20,870 14,753

(Continued on next page)

3rd Quart.er July-Sept.ember 1984


2,046 956 4,249 1,405 2,166 667

454 461 106 173

5,027 2,446 1,385 1,014

685 459 1,613 2,245 3,975 2,740

295 422 261 578 183 254 362 812 30 45

22,837 14,677

....... 0'

Table 7. (Continued) Number of Non-Participants With Marketing Declines of Five Percent or Greater From Base Period and Total Number of MDP Participants, By Comparison Period, Selected Federal Orders

4th Quarter 5t.h Quarter 15-Month Cumulative Federal Order October-December 1984 Januar~-March 1985 January 1984-March 1985

Non- Non- Non-Name No. Participants Participants Participants Participants Participants Participants

number

New England 1,958 956 1,808 956 1,502 956 New York-New Jersey 2 4,302 1,368 4,126 1,334 3,107 1,310 Middle Atlantic II 1,958 668 1,620 659 1,455 658

Georgia. 1 7 539 452 287 379 289 362 SE. FlorIda, et al. 106 172 27 154 25 153 Chicago Regional 30 4,649 2,446 3,715 2,306 2,835 2,283 Southern Michigan 40 1,470 1,014 1,212 909 922 892 Indiana 2 49 678 462 4Ti 383 366 374 Kansas City, et al. 1,314 2,172 1,199 2,123 1,059 2,075 Upper Mid~est 68 3,760 2,740 3,256 2,540 2,404 2,535 Nashville 98 275 422 244 422 235 422

4 578 188 Southwest Plains 106 303 525 156 519

Centr~l Arkansas 108 177 269 112 250 98 245 Texas 126 479 821 244 696 148 713 Central Arizona 131 19 45 12 45 9 45

Selected Orders 21,987 14,585 18,527 13,681 14,610 13 ,542

Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6). 2 Data for producers in the following orders: Greater Kansas City (64); Nebraska-Western Iowa (65); Black Hills (75); Eastern South Dakota (76);

and Iowa (79). 3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); louisville-lexington-Evansville (#46); and

Nashville (#98). 4 Exc ludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order .

..... -....J

- 18 -

Table 8. Number of Non-Participants with Marketing Declines of 5 Percent or Greater and the MOP PaYI!lents They Would Have Received, Selected Orders

Federal Order Marketing MOP Payments Name No. Farms declines Total Per farm

number mil. lbs. mil. dol. dollars

New England 1 1,502 203.0 20.3 13,516 New York-New Jersey 2 3,107 317.4 31.7 10,215 Middle Atlantic 4 1,455 200.8 20.1 13,798 Georgia 1 7 289 68.8 6.9 23,810 SEe Florida, et al. 25 35.4 3.5 141,809 Chicago Regional 30 2,835 357.8 35.8 12,622 Southern Michigan 40 922 100.9 10.1 10,941 Indiana 2 49 366 48.4 4.8 13,227 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 496 66.1 6.6 13,317 Greater Kansas City 64 202 32.0 3.2 15,820 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 264 46.7 4.7 17,690 Upper Midwest 68 2,404 267.1 26.7 11,109 Black Hills 75 20 4.2 0.4 20,764 E. South Dakota 76 61 7.9 0.8 13,010 Iowa 3 79 512 67.0 6.7 13,084 Nashville

4 98 235 32.4 3.2 13,780 Southwest Plains 106 156 24.9 2.5 15,958 Central Arkansas 108 98 14.0 1.4 14,303 Oregon-Washington 124 153 56.6 5.7 37,022 Puget 4Sound-Inland 125 237 93.9 9.4 39,624 Texas 126 148 39.4 3.9 26,681 Central Arizona 131 9 6.7 0.7 74 ,435 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 37 21.0 2.1 56 ,744

Selected Orders 15,533 2,112.4 211. 2 13,600

1 Data for Florida producers in the following orders: . Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).

2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following or ders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Orde r (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).

3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisville-Lexington-Evansville (#46) ; and Nashville (1198).

4 Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the order.

- 19 -

Previous-Year Comparisons

Comparisons were made -between each quarter of the program and the same

quarter one year earlier. MDP participants decreased marketings an average

of 19.0 percent between the first quarter of 1983 and the first quarter of

1984. (See Table 9 and tables in Appendix III.) The decrease escalated in

the next two quarters to 23.9 and 24.7 percent, respectively. It fe l l to

21.6 percent in the fourth quarter and then plummeted to 9.1 percent i n the

final quarter. The fifth-quarter decrease was low because this final

quarter (January-March 1985) was being compared with the same quarter a

year earlier (January-March 1984), a quarter in which participants had

already attained significant decreases in marketings.

A fifteen-month cumulative comparison using previous-year time periods

was not done because of overlapping quarters. That is, marketings i n the

first quarter of 1984 would have been used as both a current time period

and a previous-year time period; this would have effectively eliminated

that quarter's marketings from the analysis.

Table 9 also shows the participants' average percentage change in

marketings between the base period and the diversion program period.

Except for the fifth quarter, declines from the base period were three to

six percentage points larger than the corresponding quarterly declines from

1983. This reflects the fact that participants had reduced marketings

after the base period but before the MDP began.

Marketing changes for non-participants during each MDP quarter

compared to the same quarter in the previous year are shown in Table 10.

In all quarterly periods but the first, the majority of non-participants

were decreasing marketings. The non-participants with decreases incurred

an average decrease of nearly l3 percent in each of the five quar ters.

Non-participants who increased marketings did so at a rate of 16 percent

during the first quarter and approximately 14 percent in the succeeding

four quarters.

The entire group of non-participants increased their marketings by an

average of 4.1 and 1.0 percent, respectively, during the first two

quarters. Their marketings change was reversed during the third and f ourth

quarters when they registered decrea.ses of 0.4 and 0.1 pe r cent,

respectively. In the fifth quarter, an increase of 0.6 percent was

recorded.

u

- 20 -

Table 9. Average Percentage Change in Marketings for MDP Participants From the Base Period to 1984/85 and From 1983/84 to 1984/85, By Comparison Period, Combined Orders

Comparison Period Base Period-1984/85 1983/1984-1984/85

First Quarter 1984

Second Quarter 1984

Third Quarter 1984

Fourth Quarter 1984

First Quarter 1985

IS-Month Cumulative

-21. 7

-27.4

-28.5

-27.5

-27.9

-25.8

percentage change

-19.0

-23.9

-24.7

-21.6

- 9.1

N.A.

Table 10. Non-Participants Increasing and Decreasing Marketings and Their Average Percentage Change in Marketings Between 1983/84 and 1984/85, by Comparison Period, Combined Orders

Percent of farms Percent change in marke tings Comparison Period Increasing Decreasing Increasing Decreasing All

First Quarter 1984 57.1 42.9 16.1 -12.5 4.1

Second Quarter 1984 49.9 50.1 14.6 -13.3 1.0

Third Quarter 1984 45.6 54.4 14.6 -13.9 -0.4

Fourth Quarter 1984 47.2 52.8 13.9 -13.8 -0.1

First Quarter 1985 49.2 50.8 13.7 -12.9 0.6

Second Quarter 1985* 61.0 39.0 15.7 -12.9 4.3

* Orders for which data was available are listed in Appendix Table IV-7.

- 21 -

Table 11 compares non-participants with marketing declines to all

participants. In most comparison periods, "decreasing" non-participants

outnumbered total participants by more than a two-to-one ratio. However,

MDP participants decreased marketings to a much greater degree than

non-participants in the first four quarters of the program (e.g., 19.0

percent for participants in the first quarter relative to only 12.5 percent

for non-participants). Once again, due to the overlapping quarters of the

MDP, participants only decreased 9.1 percent in the last quarter o f the

program (January-March 1985) relative to the first quarter (January-March

1984) . This change was less than that incurred by "decreasing"

non-participants.

The decreasing group of non-participants accounted for actual volume

declines in marketings that were greater than the volume declines for

participants in all five quarters. During the first quarter of 1985,

"decreasing" non-participants accounted for a reduction of almost one

billion pounds in marketings compared with the first quarter of 1984. All

participants reduced marketings by less than 300 million pounds during the

January-March 1985 quarter.

Post-MOP

Preliminary data for the first quarter of the post-diversion period

(April-June 1985) indicates that most MOP participants began to increase

marketings after the program ended. However, about one-third of the

participants continued at, or below, the level they originally contracted

for; these participants tended to be smaller-volume producers as they

represented only about one-quarter of the milk involved.

The preliminary April-June 1985 information, available from Federal

Orders representing more than 70,000 producers, is shown in Appendix Tables

11-8, 111-7, and IV-7.

As seen in Appendix Table 11-8, 23.1 percent of participants re t urned

their marketings to levels above their pre-program (base-period) volumes in

the second quarter of 1985. The average increase above the base-period

volume was 14.4 percent for this group. The ' remaining participants

continued their marketing at levels which averaged 23.8 percent below their

base-period volumes. As a group, the volume of milk marketed by all

participants in the second quarter was 15.7 percent below base-period

levels.

- 22 -

Table 1l. .Marketing Changes From 1983/84 to 1984/85 for All MDP Participants and for Selected Non-Participants, By Comparison Period, Combined Orders

All MDP Part.icieants Selp.cted Non-Particieant.s* Number of 1983/84-1984/85 change NUlT'ber of 1983/84-1984/85 change

Comearison Period farms Mil. 1 bs. Percent farms Mi 1. 1 bs. Percent

Jan-Mar '84 (1st Qtr.) 18,473 818 -19.0 35,623 819 -12.5

Apr-Jun '84 (2nd Qtr.) 18,391 1,038 -23.9 42,053 1,084 -13 .3

Jul-Sep '84 (3rd Qtr . ) 18,341 986 -24.7 45,608 1 ,152 -13.9

Oct-Dec '84 (4th Qtr.) 18,179 814 -21.6 43,425 1,070 -13.8

Jan-Mar '85 (5th Qtr.) 16,607 289 - 9.1 39,205 979 -12.9

* Non-participants with 1983/84-1984/85 marketing decreases.

- 23 -

When compared with the same quarter in 1984, MDP participants

increased their marketings significantly during the second quarter of 1985.

As seen in Appendix Table 111-7, almost three-fourths of all participants

had marketings above last year's levels. The average increase for this

group was 26.6 percent. The remaining participants decreased marketings an

average of 16.9 percent. As a group, all participants incurred an average

increase of 15.1 percent.

Non-participants also increased their marketings in the second quarter

of 1985 relative to the previous year. For the group as a whole , the

increase was 4.3 percent. As seen in Table 10 and Appendix Table 1V-7, 61

percent of all non-participants increased marketings while 39 percent

decreased. This was a shift from the previous four quarters when the

majority of non-participants were decreasing their marketings.

Although participants played a major role in the year-to-year increase

in marketings reported for the second quarter of 1985, non-participants

played an equally important role. The non-participants increased

marketings by 488 million pounds whereas the participants increased

marketings 338 million pounds.

APPENDIX I

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings

and Previous Period Marketings

[

The tables in this Appendix contain data from the following Federal Orders unless otherwise indicated.

Federal Order Name No.

New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget

4Sound-Inland 125

Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

1 Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).

2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders : Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50) ; Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).

3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders : Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisville-Lexington-Evansville (#46); and Nashville (1198).


Table I-IA. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Participants

[ Percentage Difference Current

Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*

number mil. lbs.

50 214 50.4 25 50 175 40.5

[ 20 25 67 i3.7 15 20 137 26.3 12 15 119 25.S 10 12 93 20.2 9 10 47 12.9 8 9 56 14.5 7 8 52 13.0 6 7 65 17.2 5 6 78 17.9 4 5 79 15.3 3 4 89 18.7 2 3 123 29.2 1 2 145 32;0 0 1 130 29.6

Subtotal 1,669 376.9

- 1 0 126 27.7 - 2 - 1 153 40.9 - 3 - 2 167 42.8 - 4 - 3 217 57.1 - 5 - 4 182 43.4 - 6 - 5 275 60.1 - 7 - 6 249 59.1 - 8 - 7 305 74.7 - 9 - 8 316 77.7 -10 - 9 370 93.1 -12 -10 793 188.3 -15 -12 1,297 304.4 -20 -15 2,301 528.6 -30 -20 5,044 960.4

-30 5,333 657.8

Subtotal 17,128 3,216.1

TOTAL 18,797 3,593.0

* Totals may not add due t.o rounding.

[

Table I-lB. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Participants Adjusted by Contract

Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or esual to than Farms marketings*

number mil. lbs.

50 230 64.4 25 50 709 171. 0 20 25 442 100.7 15 . 20 651 157.4

·12 15 600 149.4 10 12 470 118.9

9 10 264 60.2 8 9 299 75.0 7 8 290 65.5 6 7 349 88.5 5 6 342 74.6 4 5 348 79.1 3 4 369 93.2 2 3 947 206.7 1 2 756 176.3 0 1 698 150.8

Subtotal 7,764 1,831. 6

- 1 0 846 172.3 - 2 - 1 684 137.0 - 3 - 2 632 124.8 - 4 - 3 507 102.4 - 5 - 4 444 80.9 - 6 - 5 378 64.2 - 7 - 6 356 57.9 - 8 - 7 312 53.7 - 9 - 8 265 42.8 -10 - 9 256 40.2 -12 -10 456 63.7 -15 -12 506 67.8 -20 -15 529 62.4 -30 -20 626 58.9

-30 814 33.9

Subtotal 7,611 1,163.0

TOTAL 15,375 2,994.5

§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 4, 64, 65, 75, 76, 79, and 137 not included.

* Totals may not add due to rounding.

·[ Table I-IC.

[

[

Number of Farms and Milk Harketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Harketings

Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants

Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or egual to than Farms marketings*

number mil. lbs.

50 5,059 1,154.1 25 50 8,663 2,025.7 20 25 3,693 874 . 1 15 20 4,783 1,136.0 12 15 3,344 781. 7 10 12 2,418 559.7

9 10 1,263 290.8 8 9 1,242 284.2 7 8 1,381 307.9 6 7 1,298 275.2 5 6 1,374 317.4 4 5 1,341 294.6 3 4 1,413 292.7 2 3 1,395 306.9 1 2 1,311 . 273.7 0 1 1,316 275.4

Subtotal 41,294 9,450.2

- 1 0 1,299 269.0 - 2 - 1 1,250 250.8 - 3 - 2 1,250 253.9 - 4 - 3 1,204 232.2 - 5 - 4 1,162 220.4 - 6 - 5 1,156 217.0 - 7 - 6 1,077 185.2 - 8 - 7 1,029 180.8 - 9 - 8 953 166.6 -10 - 9 961 160.9 -12 -10 1,607 267.3 -15 -12 2,179 337.8 -20 -15 2,618 373.7 -30 -20 3,109 381. 9

-30 5,478 265.3

Subtotal 26,332 3,763.0

TOTAL 67,626 13,213.0



Table I-lD.

[

[

[

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: January-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants

Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketinBs*

number mil. Ibs.

50 167 28.1 25 50 258 52.3 20 25 126 20.0 15 20 204 37.3 12 15 177 29.6 10 12 170 35.4

9 10 93 15.5 8 9 90 17.4 7 8 115 29.4 6 7 95 18.6 5 6 133 27.7 4 5 143 30.1 3 4 126 29.8 2 3 157 37.9 1 2 167 36.4 0 1 199 47.8

.Subtotal 2,420 493.5

- 1 0 202 41.6 - 2 - 1 236 55.7 - 3 - 2 272 66.2 - 4 - 3 281 55.4 - 5 - 4 304 72.2 - 6 - 5 322 64.0 - 7 - 6 309 68.7 - 8 - 7 347 64.4 - 9 - 8 373 104.5 -10 - 9 399 82.7 -12 -10 864 187.2 -15 -12 1,359 306.9 -20 -15 2,385 498.5 -30 -20 4,253 810.3

-30 4,147 514.1

Subtotal 16,053 2,992.2

TOTAL 18,473 3,485.7

§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.

the and

[

[

[

Table I-lE. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: january-March 1984 Previous Time Period: January-March 1983 Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants

Percenta~e Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketin~s*

number mil. lbs.

50 3,372 654.7 25 50 7,820 1,594.1 20 25 4,008 909.8 15 20 5,497 1,253.3 12 15 4,223 986.8 10 12 3,281 757.0

9 10 1,719 421. 2 8 9 1,839 429.8 7 8 1,841 446.5 6 7 1,935 448.7 5 6 1,928 446.8 4 5 1,984 461.0 3 4 1,960 452.2 2 3 2,037 460.3 1 2 2,079 469.7 0 1 1,986 444.8

Subtotal 47,509 10,636.6

- 1 0 2,078 451. 7 - 2 - 1 2,025 422.2 - 3 -" 2 1,894 415.8 - 4 - 3 1,852 384.3 - 5 - 4 1,782 368.6 - 6 - 5 1,781 367.0 - 7 - 6 1,586 320.6 - 8 - 7 1,464 276.2 - 9 - 8 1,480 284.6 -10 - 9 1,354 240.4 -12 -10 2,421 416.5 -15 -12 2,949 486.2 -20 -15 3,544 524.8 -30 -20 3,721 494.2

-30 5,692 278.3

Subtotal 35,623 5,731.2

TOTAL 83,132 16,367.8


the and

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

Table 1-2B. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: Previous Time Period: Diversion Program Status:

Percenta8e Difference Greater than Less or eg,ual to than

50 25 50 20 25 15 20 12 15 10 12

9 10 8 9 7 8 6 7 5 6 4 5 3 4 2 3 1 2 0 1

Subtotal

- 1 0 - 2 - 1 - 3 - 2 - 4 - 3 - 5 - 4 - 6 - 5 - 7 - 6 - 8 - 7 - 9 - 8 -10 - 9 -12 -10 -15 -12 -20 -15 -30 -20

-30

Subtotal

TOTAL

April-June 1984 April-June 1981/82 Base Period Participants Adjusted by Contract

Current period

Farms marketings* number mil. lbs.

125 49.5 320 83.7 173 38.8 286 61.1 270 62.8 266 66.9 143 33.0 163 27.8 201 44.3 225 46.7 233 51.9 282 68.3 347 84.8 554 123.6 556 127.4 575 113.8

4,719 1,084.4

710 139.6 701 148.3 6"41 152.4 660 129.5 641 128.9 573 116.6 565 110.6 501 94.0 506 93.7 443 76.5 786 130.4 935 153.1 952 132.2 876 94.9

1,155 40.0

10,645 1,740.8

15,364 2,825.2

§ Data from Federal Order No. 137 not included.


[

Table I-2C. Number of Farms and Milk ~~rketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: April-June 1984 Previous Time Period: April-June 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants


number mil. lbs.

50 3,854 1,072.4 25 50 7,052 1,705.6 20 25 3,145 796.1 15 20 4,246 1,024.6 12 15 3,092 731. 6 10 12 2,308 568.3 9 10 1,250 301.0 8 9 1,286 287.3 7 8 1,277 303.0 6 7 1,356 303.3 5 6 1,399 315.9 4 5 1,402 327.1 3 4 1,438 310.3 2 3 1,412 320.2 1 2 1,380 304.0 0 1 1,457 303.2

Subtotal 37,354 8,973.7

- 1 0 1,413 308.1 - 2 - 1 1,408 294.0 - 3 - 2 1,381 287.9 - 4 - 3 1,301 254.5 - 5 - 4 1,291 261.3 - 6 - 5 1,271 258.2 - 7 - 6 1,219 239.0 - 8 - 7 1,114 202.5 - 9 - 8 1,164 216.8 -10 - 9 998 185.0 -12 -10 1,912 326.9 -15 -12 2,426 416.9 -20 -15 3,151 476.6 -30 -20 3,615 494.0

-30 6,975 324.3

Subtotal 30,639 4,546.1

TOTAL 67,993 13,519.7



[

Table 1-2D. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: April-June 1984 Previous Time Period: April-June 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants


number mil. lbs.

50 150 35.9 25 50 187 39.3 20 25 70 14.6 15 20 122 22.2 12 15 103 19.2 10 12 95 15.1 9 10 53 9.2 8 9 6.2 11.0 7 8 71 12.9 6 7 77 15.1 5 6 83 18.2 4 5 88 16.8 3 4 105 23.9 2 3 107 22.6 1 2 124 30.6 0 1 162 30.9


- 1 0 149 29.7 - 2 - 1 152 31.9 - 3 - 2 193 35.5 - 4 - 3 174 Zi1.6 - 5 - 4 195 31.6 - 6 - 5 231 51.8 - 7 - 6 254 50.3 - 8 - 7 311 71.0 - 9 - 8 272 57.6 -10 - 9 293 62.3 -12 -10 678 138.7 -15 -12 1,178 236.6 -20 -15 2,057 400.9 -30 -20 4,498 868.0

-30 6,097 849.5

Subtotal 16,732 2,966.8

TOTAL 18,391 3,304.4

§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included.


[

0 Table I-2E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and

[ Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: April-June 1984 Previous Time Period: April-June 1983

[ Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants

[ Percentage Difference Current

Greater than Less period or egual to than Farms marketings*

number mil. lbs.

[ 50 2,330 567.1 25 50 5,699 1,267.6 20 25 3,102 714.0 15 20 4,697 1,086.3 12 15 3,659 876.8 10 12 3.,012 723.5 9 10 1> 577 374.6 8 9 1> 730 413.0 7 8 1,768 430.8

[ 6 7 1,808 423.5 5 6 1,983 481. 1 4 5 2,023 460.8 3 4 2,095 490.0

[ 2 3 2,104 485.1 1 2 2,156 529.8 0 1 2,086 513.7

[ Subtotal 41,829 '9,837.6

[ - 1 0 2,118 482.4 - 2 - 1 2,108 475.8 - 3 - 2 2,209 513.7 - 4 - 3 2,072 452.7 - 5 - 4 2,011 444.6 - 6 - 5 1,932 410.2 - 7 - 6 1,867 387.5

[ - 8 - 7 1. 747 357.8 - 9 - 8 1,739 350.1 -10 - 9 1,574 303.6 -12 -10 2,833 548.3

[ -15 -12 3,504 624.1 -20 -15 4,232 702.4 -30 -20 4,518 641.0

[ -30 7,589 374.6

Subtotal 42,053 7,068.9

[ TOTAL 83,882 16,906.5

[ § Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.

[

Table 1-3A. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings


Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than

50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

July-September 1984 July-September 1981/82 Base Period Participants

Farms number

119 109

55 65 54 41 37 31 36 40 31 38 50 60 55 76

897

89 99

115 125 126 166 168 191 204 207 535 845

1,740 4,690 8,412

17,712

18,609

Current period

marketings* mil. lbs.

28.7 26.4 9.9

12.4 9.4 6.0 9.2 5.5 4.9

10.0 6.1 7.8 8.3

10.5 14.1 14.3

183.6

18.4 17.0 19.3 26.9 24.8 31.3 34.8 35.7 42.8 39.0

130.9 172.4 349.7 866.6

1,088.4

2,898.1

3,081.6


[

[

[

[




50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

July-September 1984 July-September 1981/82 Base Period Participants Adjusted by Contract

Farms number

130 336 218 341 334 292 197 209 206 . 242 291 350 383 558 491 5ll

5,089

587 519 569 525 529 473 494 465 458 442 797 973

1,176 1,264 1,652

10,923

16,012

Current period


40.5 60.3 39.8 65.0 59.0 50.5 52.2 47.7 37.4 51.5 56.6 76.7 74.5

104.0 94.0

108.0

1,017.8

ll1.3 106.2 109.2 ll5.6 105.0 89.1 92.4 87.3 85.6 84.3

140.8 161. 2 158.7 140.0 65.0

1,651.6

2,669.4

§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 64, 65, 75, 76, 79, and 137 not included.


[

[

Table 1-3C. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: July-September 1984 Previous Time Period: July-September 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants


50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Farms number

3,825 7,179 3,250 4,069 2,946 2,134 1,140 1,160 1,256 1,199 1,253 1,242 1,296 1,333 1,409 1,364

36,055

1,273 1,267 1,246 1,235 1,209 1,217 1,166 1,164 1,154 1,075 1,977 2,598 3,390 3,966 8,230

32,167

68,222

Current period


910.5 1,653.2

747.3 938.8 641. 2 470.9 257.0 254.6 283.4 258.3 297.9 266.8 277 .8 271. 8 285.8 276.0

8,091. 0

264.8 254.7 250.7 243.9 232.7 220.2 215.9 211. 6 200.4 183.3 324.7 404.9 503.5 508.1 363.9

4,383.4

12,474.4



Table I-3D.

[


Current Time Period: July-September 1984 Previous Time Period: July-September 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants

Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or e9.ual to than Farms marketings*

number miL lbs.

50 168 29.4 25 50 201 37.5 20 25 91 14.1 15 20 141 24.9 12 15 121 18.1 10 12 121 18.2 9 10 57 8.4 8 9 56 8.6 7 8 88 16.3 6 7 80 13.2 5 6 99 20.1 4 5 96 17.3 3 4 105 19.4 2 3 100 21.1 1 2 124 21.0 0 1 149 26.2


- 1 0 152 26.9 - 2 - 1 148 26.7 - 3 - 2 176 30.5 - 4 - 3 198 33.4 - 5 - 4 224 41.4 - 6 - 5 229 44.4 - 7 - 6 251 55.0

8 7 261 50.6 - 9 - 8 291 58.7 -10 - 9 295 79.8 -12 -10 629 120.8 -15 -12 1,089 211. 7 -20 -15 1,901 348.5 -30 -20 4,193 746.5

-30 6,507 816.2

Subtotal 16,544 2,691. 2

TOTAL 18,341 3,005.1


the and

L [ Table 1-3E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the

Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

[ Current Time Period: July-September 1984 Previous Time Period: July-September 1983

[ Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants

Percentage Difference Current

[ Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*

number mil. lbs.

50 2,157 480.0 25 50 5,415 1,162.2 20 25 2,894 617.0

[ 15 20 4,156 920.3 12 15 3,324 725.3 10 12 2,679 631. 6

[ 9 10 1,502 346.1 8 9 1,520 354.7 7 8 1,617 372 .1

[ 6 7 1,688 395.3 5 6 1,739 391. 2 4 5 1,869 431.3 3 4 1,875 423.6

[ 2 3 1,902 443.8 1 2 2,023 442.3 0 1 1,927 450.5

[ Subtotal 38,287 8,587.3

1 0 2,033 446.2

[ - 2 - 1 2,062 455.1 - 3 - 2 2,037 444.3 - 4 - 3 2,079 451.2

[ - 5 - 4 2,004 395.9 - 6 - 5 2,031 405.9 - 7 - 6 1,898 364.5 - 8 - 7 1,853 354.4

[ 9 8 1,772 336.5 -10 - 9 1,614 305.9 -12 -10 3,123 560.7 ,... , -15 -12 3,940 671. 2 -20 -15 4,890 778.9 -30 -20 5,265 721.3

-30 9,007 443.6

[ Subtotal 45,608 7,135.4

l TOTAL 83,895 15,722.8

§ Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. r * Totals may not add due to rounding.

l

r

r L Table 1-4A. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders), by the

Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and

r Previous Period Marketings

l Current Time Period: October-December 1984

r Previous Time Period: October-December 1981/82 Base Period

Diversion Program Status: Participants

[ Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period

r or eg,ual to than Farms marketings* number mil. lbs.

50 95 24.0

[ 25 50 120 24.4 20 25 44 10.9 15 20 77 15.9

[ 12 15 70 12.1 10 12 56 9.6

9 10 33 10.0 8 9 43 6.5

[ 7 8 43 6.4 6 7 48 9.3 5 6 52 9.6

[ 4 5 59 11.4 3 4 66 13.5 2 3 83 20.8 1 2 86 16.9

[ 0 1 122 28.8 .


[ - 1 0 99 17.2 - 2 - 1 III 21.6 - 3 - 2 117 24.3

[ - 4 - 3 146 30.0 - 5 - 4 172 30.5 - 6 - 5 177 37.2

[ - 7 - 6 190 37.2 - 8 - 7 211 46.6

9 8 215 45.8

[ -10 - 9 224 46.6 -12 -10 539 109.3 -15 -12 887 172.3 -20 -15 1,756 342.2

[ -30 -20 4,443 848.5 -30 8,019 991. 1

l Subtotal 17,306 2,800.3

TOTAL 18,403 3,030.5

[ * Totals may not add due to rounding.

r

r-

l

-[ Table 1-4B.

[

[

[

[

[

r. r· ~

[

[

[

r [

[

[

[

[

r

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1981/82 Base

Period Diversion Program Status: Participants Adjusted by Contract

Percentage Difference Greater than Less or equal to than .

50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Current period

Farms marketings* number mil. lbs.

170 44.0 493 90.4 290 48.3 553 92.9 496 97.7 451 83.0 268 55.4 279 51.0 258 53.7 367 80.6 364 71.2 359 66.1 415 82.6 532 101. 4 548 99.2 571 117.2

6,414 1,234.9

587 109.2 579 110.8 574 132.2 538 105.0 573 115.0 541 98.1 502 96.4 489 81.0 480 94.9 448 72.9 813 130.9

1,009 159.0 1.236 174.6 1,370 153.0 1,898 70.0

11,637 1,703.3

18,051 2,938.2


I 'I

-[ Table 1-4C. §

the Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders ), by Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

[ Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1981/82 Base

[ Period

Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants

[ Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*

[ number mil. lbs.

50 4,046 1,008.8 25 50 8,064 1,946.0

[ 20 25 3,581 857.4 15 20 4,714 1,126.1 12 15 3,189 754.1

[ 10 12 2,435 579.9 9 10 1,269 291.2 8 9 1,259 293.8 7 8 1,224 268.0

[ 6 7 1,318 294.8 5 6 1,368 315.9 4 5 1,423 323.9

[ 3 4 1,381 323.2 2 3 1,365 316.1 1 2 1,341 295.9 0 1 1.,367 278.9

[ Subtotal 39,344 9,274.1

[ - 1 0 1,351 282.9 - 2 - 1 1,365 288.7 - 3 - 2 1,282 276.4

[ - 4 - 3 1.,277 243.4 - 5 - 4 1,223 236.6 - 6 - 5 1,194 233.0 - 7 - 6 1,152 212.6

l - 8 - 7 1,132 206.3 - 9 - 8 1,101 185;7 -10 - 9 1,105 187.4

[ -12 -10 1,882 325.7 -15 -12 2,454 373.6 -20 -15 3,187 483.5 -30 -20 3,876 477.5

l -30 7,810 370.8

Subtotal 31,391 4,384.2

r TOTAL 70,735 13,658.3 l

[ § Data from Federal Orders Nos. 33, 36, and 137 not included.


l I I -

[

L [

[

r L

[

[

[

[

l [

[

l [

[

r [ r L

Table 1-4D. Number of Farms and Nilk Narketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1983 Diversion Program Status: Participants


50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Farms number

213 299 133 209 158 127

91 99 83

105 117 114 132 145 154 156

2,335

198 190 221 219 256 265 283 305 291 299 651

1,100 1.978 3,809 5,779

15,844

18,179

Current period


37.9 51.2 22.0 37.0 30.2 26.8 15.5 15.7 14.7 18.9 20.8 19.2 21.8 28.4 29.9 31.0

420.8

38.6 42.1 44.1 40.6 48.5 48.9 55.1 57.4 54.5 62.2

122.5 209.0 381.1 668.6 660.4

2,533.6

2,954.4


I '\ •

.----.. -- -. ------ '-- ~ ---. - - . .. . r-

L r L

Table 1-4E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the

[ Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

[ Current Time Period: October-December 1984 Previous Time Period: October-December 1983 Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants

r l Percentage Difference Current

Greater than Less period r or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*

l number mil. lbs.

[ 50 2,078 429.2 25 50 5,308 1,106.4 20 25 2,789 592.1 15 20 4,256 951. 8

r 12 15 3,439 762.8 10 12 2,745 633.0

9 10 1,473 340.9

[ 8 9 1,610 380.8 7 8 1,710 419.6 6 7 1,780 414.8 5 6 1,778 421.0

[ 4 5 1,847 415.2 3 4 1,883 454.0 2 3 2,051 477 .1

[ 1 2 1,983 449.7

° 1 2,057 451.1

Subtotal 38,787 8,699.6

[ - 1 0 2,108 497.1 - 2 - 1 2,077 445.9

l 3 2 2,091 454.6 - 4 - 3 1,964 412.8 - 5 - 4 1,878 379.9

[ - 6 - 5 1,864 365.5 - 7 - 6 1,778 338.1 - 8 - 7 1,799 348.9 - 9 - 8 1,635 305.6

[ -10 - 9 1,620 292.9 -12 -10 2,963 518.4 -15 -12 3,690 592.3

l -20 -15 4,663 693.6 -30 -20 5,050 648.2

-30 8,245 391.9

L Subtotal 43,425 6,685.6

TOTAL 82,212 15,385.2

L § Data from Federal Order No. 131 not included. * Totals may not add due to rounding.

l ! 'I t

l

L Table I-SA.

[

[

[

[

[

r l [

r '-

[

[

t [

[

[

[ ,.... )

Number of Farms and Milk Harketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: January-March 1985 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Divp.rsion Program Status: Participants


50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

o - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Farms number

106 86 33 54 43 39 22 29 21 35 38 47 44 46 51 81

775

94 91 98

ll7 129 171 169 176 186 210 452 823

1,643 4,104 7,321

15,784

16 .• 559

Current period


25.0 20.3 5.4

11.7 14.3 7.6 5.1 6.2 3.3 7.8 7.9

15.8 9.0

13.3 9.4

18.0

180.3

17.4 18.5 19.1 24.1 25.0 33.5 33.8 39.9 41.3 42.2

100.8 185.5 356.9 824.8 928.9

2,691. 7

2,872.0

§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 94, 137, and 138 not included.


1 'I '

l

l [

[

[

l [

r [

[

r [

[

l [

[

r


Current Time Period: January-March 1985 Previous Time Period: January-March 1981/82 Base Period Diversion Program Status: Participants Adjusted by Contract


50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

- 1 - 2

3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

o - 1

2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -2.0 -30

Farms number

174 319 230 389 424 375 221 227 298 316 352 375 422 468 447 477

5,514

490 517 508 526 507 559 461 466 489 398 810

1,051 1,330 1,565 1,368

11,045

16,559

Current period


40.2 74.9 42.2 75.5 94.1 74.2 56.1 49.4 67.6 64.9 68.9 79.6 90.6 93.0

102.3 96.5

1,169.8

105.0 110.0 101.5 114.2 106.7 111.0 98.9 81.5 87.3 71.1

138.6 160.6 179.4 162.1 74.2

1,702.2

2,872.0



! ' I f

.[

[

[

r [

[

[

[

[

[

l [

[

Table 1-5C. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings



50 25 20 15 12 10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 o

Subtotal

- 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

Subtotal

TOTAL

50 25 20 15 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

° - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 -10 -12 -15 -20 -30

January-March 1985 January-March 1981/82 Base Period Non-Participants

Farms number

6,222 9,511 3,483 4,321 2,928 2, ll6 1,125 1,149 1,155 1,203 1,148 1,216 1,133 1,153 1, ll7 1,171

40,151

1,109 1,126 1,040 1,078

978 1,003

987 939 911 824

1,520 1,987 2. ,796 3,636 4,975

24,909

65,060

Current period

marketings'" mil. lbs.

1,611.8 2,503.4

908.7 1,088.8

706.0 513.9 252.5 251.4 257.4 268.2 251. 8 259.2 238.3 259.0 232.8 238.4

9,841. 6

233.6 219.0 204.0 204.9 173.2 177.6 183.2 168.6 163.6 139.7 246.2 308.9 404.7 457.9 357.9

3,642.8

13,484.4

§ Data from Federal Orders Nos. 33, 36, 94, 137, and 138 not included.


I f' ..

[

[ Table 1-5D.

[

[

r l

[

[

r L l L L [

L L [ r


Current Time Period: January-March 1985 Previous Time Period: January-March 1984 Diversion Program Status: Participants

Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*

number mil. lbs.

50 350 54.1 25 50 650 110.0 20 25 339 71.3 15 20 495 88.7 12 15 427 86.2 10 12 301 67.0 9 10 212 43.3 8 9 224 45.5 7 8 222 45.8 6 7 262 55.1 5 6 241 47.4 4 5 257 53.8 3 4 308 59.5 2 3 312 62.3 1 2 339 69.7 0 1 363 84.0

Subtotal 5,302 1,043.9

- 1 0 383 76.2 - 2 - 1 382 79.9 - 3 - 2 378 73.4 - 4 - 3 400 73.7 - 5 - 4 383 74.3 - 6 - 5 363 74.2 - 7 - 6 376 67.7 - 8 - 7 370 69.4 - 9 - 8 386 86.0 -10 - 9 372 74.1 -12 -10 716 162.6 -15 -12 1,041 202.7 -20 -15 1,462 241. 8 -30 -20 1,993 283.1

-30 2,300 202.5

Subtotal 11,305 1,841. 7

TOTAL 16,607 2,885.7



the and

[

l Table 1-5E. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Combined Orders§), by the

r Percentage Difference Between Current Period Marketings and Previous Period Marketings

Current Time Period: January-March 1985

[ Previous Time Period: January-March 1984 Diversion Program Status: Non-Participants

[ Percentage Difference Current Greater than Less period or eg,ual to than Farms marketings*

[ number mil. Ibs.

50 2,026 408.9

[ 25 50 5,053 1,082.9 20 25 2,829 640.1 15 20 4,185 988.1 12 15 3,348 813.5

[ 10 12 2,653 668.1 9 10 1,435 347.2 8 9 1,536 376.3

[ 7 8 1,652 411. 9 6 7 1,673 405.1 5 6 1,789 428.2 4 5 1,812 435.0

[ 3 4 1,953 463.9 2 3 1,995 484.7 1 2 1,985 471.3

[ 0 1 2,059 476.3

Subtotal 37,983 8,901.4

r - 1 0 2,046 479.1 - 2 - 1 2,019 449.2 - 3 - 2 2,012 443.4

[ - 4 - 3 1,983 424.2 - 5 - 4 1,957 427.0 - 6 - 5 1,931 403.6

[ - 7 - 6 1,855 376.3 - 8 - 7 1,796 346.1 - 9 - 8 1,718 323.5 -10 - 9 1,559 289.2

L -12 -10 2,840 503.5 -15 -12 3,635 607.5 -20 -15 4,401 648.0

[ -30 -20 4,558 566.1

-30 4,895 324.7

Subtotal 39,205 6,611.3

[ TOTAL 77 ,188 15,512.7

l § Data from Federal Orders Nos. 94, 137, and 138 not included.

* r Totals may not add due to rounding.

I ' I •

r L.

[

r [

[

[

[

[ [

[

[

[ [

[

[ [

APPENDIX II

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984/85 Versus Base Period

\

1 ' I

--, ,.--- .., ~ r-, .-, ~ rJ r ~-, r-, ,1 11 r-l r-l r-, 11 r, r-J

Table II-i. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MOP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter i984 Versus First Quarter Base Period

Increasing Marketings Decreasing~arketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings

Average Average Average Federa 1 Order Mi 11 i on change Hi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change

Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)

New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Fl or i da, et a 1 . Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan

Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

1 2 4 7

30 33 36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest Black Hi lls E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texas

68 75 76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126

Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138 '

Orders Combined*

72 126

25 20 22

203 68 50 95 54 88 51 96

235 o

23 158

35 411

33 8

10 9

126 3

3

10 2

1,669

* May not add due to rounding.

7.5 8.5 3.6 4.5

12.7 8.3 8.0 7.9 9.4

11.8 7.1 9.2

13.2 8.6 0.0

18.3 16.8 8.3

10.4 5.7 3 . 1 5.4 5.6

15.9 6.7 6.3 2.8 5.9

8.9

See footnotes at end of Table 11-8.

14 25

6

8 38 39 10

7

16 8

16 9

17 38 o 4

23 17

7

8

4

4

48 6

2 2

377

7.5 10.7 4.2 7.0

14.7 10.1 7.9 7.5 9.6

11.9 8.1

10.6 15.2 9.8 0.0

19.9 17.6 21.2 12.3 7.5 3.7 5.1 6.1

19.7 6.7 6.8 2.1

10.9

10.5

7 .0 13.1 5.8

20 . 0 16.0 11.0 9.9

11.3 B.9

10.9 9.0

11.6 35.9 10.1 0.0

35.8 40.2 23.5 11. 1

9.8 25.8 12.0

2.1 36.8 6.0

10.9 12.6 5.8

17.1

884 1,354

677 426 151

2,243 785 584 919 405

1 ,147 505 630

2,505 19

103 783 388 378 545 246 174 152 664

42 45

342 32

17,128

92.5 91.5 96.4 95.5 87.3 91.7 92.0 92.1 90.6 88.2 92.9 90.8 86.8 91.4

100.0 81.7 83.2 91.7 89.6 94.3 96.9 94.6 94.4 84.1 93.3 93.8 97.2 94.1

91. 1

176 206 143 109 218 345 118

81 151

61 180

74 94

356 4

15 110

62 52 98 35 70 54

195 78 16 99 20

3,216

92.5 89.3 95.8 93.0 85.3 89.9 92.,1 92.5 90.4 88.1 91.9 89.4 84.8 90.2

100.0 80.1 82.4 78.8 87.7 92.5 96.3 94.9 93.9 80.3 93.3 93.2 97.9 89.1

89.5

-22.0 -26.4 -25.6 -31.9 -20.9 -21.5 -23.0 -22.9 -22.8 -24.2 -23.8 -25.6 -28.4 -22.0 -21.8 -26.1 -22.8 -37.2 -24.3 -26.8 -30.4 -24.7 -28.1 -27.7 -20.2 -30.6 -29.0 -25.6

-24.7

956 191 -20.4 1,480 230 -23.6

702 149 -24.6 446 117 -29.7 173 256 -17.0

2,446 383 -19.1 853 128 -21.1 634 88 -21.1

1,014 167 -20.6 459 69 -21.2

1,235 195 -21.9 556 83 -22.9 726 110 -22.9

2,740 394 -19.7 19 4 -21.8

126 18 -18.8 941 133 -16.2 423 78 -29.9 422 59 -21.2 578 106 -24.9 254 36 -29.2 184 74 -23.5 161 58 -26.8 790 242 -20.3

45 83 -18.8 48 18 -28.8

352 101 -28.4 34 22 -23.1

18,797 3,593 -21.7

--, II r-l II r -, II r-, iJ rJ 11 11 ~ r---"] II rj r, ,.-, II i1

Table II-2. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1984 Versus Second Quarter Base Period

Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings

Average Average Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change


New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgi a 7

1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget

4Sound-lnland 125

Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. , I daho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined*

16 66 9

12 12 81 25 18 30 12 38 19 63

126 2

11

89 21

6

14 7

5

2

124 1

2

7

o

818


1.7 4.6 1 .3

2.7 7.0 3.3 2.9 2.8 3.0 2.6 3.1 3.5 9.1 4.6

10.5 8.8 9.8 4.9 1.4 2.4 2.8 2.7 1.2

15.4 2.2 4.2 2.0 0.0

4.4


3 13

6 27 15

4 2 5 2 7

3

11 21

2

13 2

3

1

53 2

1

3 o

203

1.4 5.8 1.0 5.7

12.0 3.8 3.7 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.5

10.0 5.4

15.2 8.3

10.3 14.1 1.4 2.5 3.7 1.9 1.0

22.4 3.2 4.2 2.5 0.0

6.0

9.4 16.8 15.4 34.9 28.0 9.7 6.0

13.7 8.5

16.6 11. 1 14.9 58.3 9.6 7.8

54.8 46.8 24.3 5.9

12.0 21.1 20.3 0.9

28.7 18.8 17.3 3.8 0.0

22.7

940 1,377

675 437 160

2,365 829 617 984 447

1 ,197 522 628

2,614 17

114 822 410 416 564 247 179 159 680

44 46

345 34

17,869

98.3 95.4 98.7 97.3 93.0 96.7 97.1 97.2 97.0 97.4 96.9 96.5 90.9 95.4 89.5 91.2 90.2 95.1 98.6 97.6 97.2 97.3 98.8 84.6 97.8 95.8 98.0

100.0

95.6

171 217 138 94

198 376 118 83

157 64

184 76 95

364 3

17 116

15 52

101 34 72 57

183 75 17 99 21

3,199

98.6 94.2 99.0 94.3 88.0 96.2 96.3 97.4 97.1 96.8 96.4 96.5 90.0 94.6 84.8 91.7 89.7 85.9 98.6 97.5 96.3 98.1 99.0 77 .6 96.8

, 95.8

97.5 100.0

94.0

-29.5 -30.1 -29.8 -37.2 -24.2 -25.1 -28.4 -28.9 -28.1 -29.6 -28.8 -30.7 -32.2 -26.1 -25.5 -30.3 -27.8 -41.0 -32.8 -29.6 -34.0 -36.5 -36.5 -28.6 -24.4 -43.9 -35.1 -35.7

-29.2

956 1,443

684 449 172

2,446 854 635

174 231 139 100 224 391 123 85

1,014 162 459 66

1,235 191 541 78 691 106

2,740 385 19 4

125 18 911 129 431 17 422 53 578 104 254 35 184 74 161 58 804 236

45 77 48 17

352 102 34 21

18,687 3,402

-29.1 -28.4 -29.5 -35.2 -20.3 -24.2 - 27.6 -28.2 -27.4 -28.7 -27.9 -29.7 -28.1 -24.8 -21.9 -27.0 -23.8 -36.3 -32.4 -28.9 -32.8 -36.0 -36.2 -20.6 -23.5 -42.6 -34.4 -35.7

-27.4

.-., r-J ~ rJ 11 11 r 1 ,- 1 r , r , 11 11 ·n -, r --, r--1 ~ -, r-,

Table 11-3. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Third Quarter 1984 Versus Third Quarter Base Period




New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgi a 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. P~nn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Oz~rks 62 greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget

4Sound-lnland 125

Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined*

23 84 18 16 9

87 35 22 40 16 48 29 66

149 1

12 83 20 14 23 9 2 4

80 o

6

o

897

* May not add due to rounding. Less than 0.5 million pounds.

2.4 6.0 2.7 3.5 5.2 3.6 4.1 3.5 3.9 3.5 3.9 5.5 9.8 5.4 5.3 9.7 9.2 4.7 3.3 4.0 3.5 1.1 2.5 9.9 0.0 2.1 1.7 0.0

4.8

See foot.notes at end of Table 11-8.

4 15

4

3

15 15

6

3 8

3 10

4

11 18

O§

1

11 7

2

5 2

1

31 o O§

2 o

184

2.7 7.3 2.9 4.8 8.8 4.3 5.2 3.6 5.2 5.0 5.7 5.3

10.8 5.6 5.9 8.9 9.4

12.0 3.5 5.0 5.5 0.7 1.7

15.6 0.0 2.1 2.4 0.0

6.0

9.3 15.9 5.8

28.0 27.5 10.3 11. 1 5.4

10.6 16.2 11.6 17.7 42.9 11.5 1.2

21.2 36.8 29.8 11.5 9.6

13.8 30.1 9.2

25.4 0.0

11.0

10.7 0.0

18.9

933 1,321

649 445 164

2,359 819 613 974 443 .

1,187 503 606

2,591 18

112 815 409 408 555 245 182 157 732

45 47

346 34

17,712

97.6 94.0 97.3 96.5 94.8 96.4 95.9 96.5 96.1 96.5 96.1 94.5 90.2 94.6 94.7 90.3 90.8 95.3 96.7 96.0 96.5 98.9 97.5 90.1

100.0 97.9 98.3

100.0

95.2

158 188 132

64 160 347 106 76

151 54

165 70 90

309 3

15 106

48 49 91 30 71 56

170 57 17 99 20

2,898

97.3 92.7 97.1 95.2 91.2 95.7 94.8 96.4 94.8 95.0 94.3 94.7 89.2 94.4 94.1 91.1 90.6 88.0 96.5 95.0 94.5 99.3 98.3 84.4

100.0 97.9 97.6

100.0

94.0

-29.8 -30.6 -27.4 -41.4 -26.7 -26.6 -27.9 -28.7 -28.9 -29.8 -29.8 -28.8 -31.1 -28.4 -26.4 -33.3 . -30.2 -40.6 -32.7 -28.8 -32.7 -35.2 -37.7 -29.0 -33.5 -43.7 -35.4 -36.7

-30.3

956 162 -29.1 1,405 203 -28.5

667 136 -26.7 461 67 -39.8 173 175 -23.9

2,446 363 -25.5 854 112 -26.5 635 78 -27.9

1,014 159 -27.5 459 57 -28.4

1,235 175 -28.3 532 74 -27.3 672 101 -27.0

2,740 327 -27.0 19 4 -25.2

124 16 -30.6 898 117 -26.8 429 54 -36.5 422 51 -31. 7 578 95 -27,5 254 31 -31.2 184 72 -35.0 161 57 -37.2 812 202 -23.9

45 57 -33.5 48 17 -43.1

352 101 -34.8 34 20 -36.7

18,609 3,082 -28.5

-) r----, r-, ., 11 r ., r-, rJ r----, r-1 rJ rJ r, r, r-} ,---, ---, r,

Table II-4. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Fourth Quarter 1984 Versus Fourth Quarter Base Period

Increasing Market.ings Farms Marketings

Average Federal Order Million change

Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number

New England New York-New Jersey Midd.le Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn.

2 4

7

30 33 36

Southern Michigan 40 I ndi ana ') 49 St. Louis-Ozarks~ 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakot.a Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville . 4 Sout.hwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texas ·Central Arizona SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley

Orders Combined*

76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126 131

135 137 138

50 92 49 19 14

161 47 37 34 21 56 24 51

185 o

11 82 18 32 21 7

5 4

65

10 o

1,097


5.2 6.7 7.3 4.2 8.1 6.6

5.5 5.8 3.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 7.7 6.8 0.0 9.2 9.6 5.7 7.6 3.6 2.6 2.7 2.5 7.9 2.2 2.1 2.8 0.0

6.0


8 15 13

6

29 26

9

4 7

3 9

4 8

27 o 2

12 5 4 4

25 1

o 4 o

230

5.0 7.7 9.5 6.5

15.4 7.8 8.2 5.4 4.4

5.9 5.3 5.9 8.7 8.4 0.0

13.8

10.8 9.2 8.3 4.6 2.7 1.6 2.7

12.3 2.2 1.0 4.3 0.0

7.6

12.8 16.1 8.9

20.2 15.6 10.6

8.2 10.3 13.9 9 . 1

10. "3

13.8 13.1 10.2 0.0 7.3

20.7 82.3 9.7

11.9 10.9 17.9 9.3

32.5 1.9 3.7

11. 1 0.0

15.3

906 1,276

619 433 158

2,285 807 598 980 441

1,179 495 608

2,555 19

108 774 297 390 557 262 179 157 756

44

47 342 34

17,306

Decreasing Marketings A 11 Farms Farms Marketings

Average Average Million change Million change

Percent pounds _____ Per~e~ (percent) Number pounds* (percent)

94.8 93.3 92.7 95.8 91.9 93.4 94.5 94.2 96.6 95.5 95.5 95.4 92.3 93.2

100.0 90.8 90.4 94.3 92.4 96.4 97.4 97.3 97.5

92.1 97.8

97.9

97.2 100.0

94.0

160 175 126

89 160 307

99 71

144 51

162 68 88

293 3

14 98 47 50 87 31 66 51

178 63 15 88 18

2,800

95.0 92.3 90.5 93.5 84.6 92.2 91.8 94.6 95.6 94.1 94.7 94.1 91.3 91.6

100.0 86.2 89.2 90.8 91.7 95.4 97.3 98.4 97.3 87.7 97.8 99.0 95.7

100.0

92.4

-26.0 -30.1 -26.9 -37.2 -32.0 . -25.5 -28.5 -28.6 -28.3 -29.3 -29.2 -28.9 -29.3 -27.6 -27.1 -28.7 -27.2 -41.4 -28.8 -31. 7

-33.2 -29.5 -32.9 -30.3 -32.5 -35.1 -34.8 -37.1

-29.6

956 1,368

668 452 172

2,446 854 635

168 189 140 95

190 334 108 75

1,014 150 462 54

1,235 171 519 72 659 97

2,740 320 19 3

119 16 856 110 315 52 422 54 578 91 269 32 184 67 161 52 821 203

45 64 48 15

352 92 34 18

18,403 3,031

-24.7 -27.9 -24.6 -35.1 -27.4 -23.6 -26.4 -27.2 -27.1 -27.8 -27.9 -27.3 -26.9 -25.5 -27.1 -25.2 -23.9 -37.5 -26.7 -30.4 -32.4 -29.0 -32.1 -25.9 -32.0 -34.8 -33.7 -37;1

-27.5

,

;--, r--, 11

Table II-5.

rJ r -, f'"J" r-l r-, r--., ,--, rJ 11 r-, r, .--, ,.---,

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1985 Versus First Quarter Base Period

Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings Farms Marketings Farms Marketings

Average Average

'--1 rJ r-1

All Farms

Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change


New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Sout.hern Michigan

1 2

4

7

30 33 36 40 49 Indiana 2

St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa Nashville

3 4

Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget.

4Sound-lnland

Texas

65 68 75 76 79 98

106 108 124 125 126

Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135

Orders Combined*

33 64 21 18 14

114

21 20 34 18 38 14

54 119

o 12 60 15 10

5 4 2

83 " 1

775

* May not add due to rounding. § Less than 0.5 million pounds.

3.5 4.8 3.2 4.7 9.1 4.9 2.8 3.5 3.7 4.7 3.3 2.8 8.3 4.7 0.0

10.1

7.2 3.6 1.9 2.0 2.2 1.2

11.9 2.2 2.1

4.7


7 14

6

6 28 21

4

3 5

3 6

3

9 23 o 2 9

2 2

1

O§ 24

2

180

4.4 7.1 4.6 6.3

13.0 6.0 3.3 3.4 3.7 5.1 3.5 3.7 9.5 6.7 0.0 9.7 8.0 4.8 2.4 2.0 1.1 0.9

17.2 2.7 3.6

6.3

5.4 21. 1

9.9 25 . 4 22.5 10.7 10.7 8.3 9.6 7.8

15.0 7.4

34.5 9.5 0.0

66.0 75.9 14.6 6.4

37.9 7.5 5.3

30.9 0.6

2.3 "

19.1

923 1,270

638 361 140

2,192 718 559 875 365

1 ,129 491 594

2,421 18

107 773 407 515 245 180 159 613 44 47

15,784

96.5 95.2 96.8 95.3 90.9 95.1 97.2 96.5 96.3 95.3 96.7 97.2 91.7 95.3

100.0 89.9 92.8 96.4 98 . 1 98.0 97.8 98.8 88.1 97.8 97.9

95.3

163 184 132

91 186 326 102 72

140 50

167 67 88

315 3

14 99 49 88 33

66 51

114 73 16

2,692

95.6 92.9 95.4 93.7 87.0 94.0 96.7 96.6 96.3 94.9 96.5 96.3 90.5 93.3

100.0 90.3 92.0 95.2 97.6 98.0 98.9 99.1 82.8 97.3 96.4

93.7

-25.5 -31.5 -28.3 -36.6 -31.4 -25.5 -29.9 -29.9 -29.1 -30.3 -29.9 -31.0 -29.7 -29.1 -26.0 -29.2 -28.8 -32.3 -32.3 -33.8 -29.3 -31.9 -36.2 -26.0 -31.3

-29.8

956 1,334

659 379 154

2,306 739 579 909 383

1,167 505 648

2,540 18

119 833 422 525 250 184 161 696 45 48

16,559

171 198 138 97

214 347 106 75

145 52

173 70 98

338 3

16 108 52 90 34 67 52

138 75 16

2,872

-24.5 -29.3 -27.1 -34.5 -27.2 -24.0 -29.0 -29.0 -28.2 -29.1 -29.0 -30.1 -26.4 -27.4 -26.0 -25.0 -25.2 -30.9 -31.7 -33.2 -29.1 -31. 7

-30.1 -25.5 -30.5

-27.9

-, 11 r--, --, r-, r--, rJ rJ r-t 'J rJ ;-, ,---, ~ r-,

Table 1I-6. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, January-December 1984 Versus January-December Base Period


r--, ;-- 1 ,....,

All Farms



New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohi 0 Vall ey E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

1 2 4 7

30 33 36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville . 4 Southwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget Sound-Inland

4 Texas

76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126

Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined* 82

3 27 o

11

9 13

4 3 8 6 9

3 29 31 o 6

43 16

2

2

o 82

2

o

313


0.3 2.0 0.0 2.8 5.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.6 0.8 0.6 4.5 .1.2 0.0 5.1 5.1 5.3 0.5 0.2 0.4 1.1 0.0

11.4 2.2 2.1 0.6 0.0

1.8


2 27 o

16 67 12

2 2

10 5 8

2 19 21 o 5

25 19

1

2

o 147

8

5 o

407

0.3 3.2 0.0 4.3 8.2 0.8 0.5 0.6 1.7 2.3 1.1 0.6 4.7 1.5 0.0 7.4 5.4 7.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.0

16.7 2.7 2.2 1.2 0.0

3.2

S.2 23.7 0 . 0

30.6 22.3 24.3 7.0 4.6 8.3 8.7

15.6 16.4 43.8 13.1 0.0

17.6 49.5 42.2 3.9 0.7

92.1 40.3 0.0

25.4 8.1 4.8

15.2 0.0

24.8

953 1,312

668 379 157

2,298 734 578 921 378

1,156 506 619

2,518 19

112 802 288 420 529 250 182 161 638

44 47

350 29

17 ,048

99.7 98.0

100.0 97.2 94.6 99.4 99.5 99.5 99.1 98.4 99.2 99.4 95.5 98.8

100.0 94.9 94.9 94.7 99.5 99.8 99.6 98.9

100.0 88.6 97.8 97.9 99.4

100.0

98.2

693 803 554 347 753

1,432 448 318 621 223 714 296 378

1,369 14 63

441 232 216 382 138 284 224 731 275 66

392 77

12,488

99.7 96.8

100.0 95.7 91.8 99.2 99.5 99.4 98.3 97.7 98.9 99.4 95.3 98.5

100.0 . 92.6 94.6 92.6 99.5 99.7 99.5 99.3

100.0 83.3 97.3 97.8 98.8

100.0

96.8

-27.2 -26.9 -27.0 -34.9 -24.2 -23.1 -25.1 -25.7 -25.6 -26.7 -26.3 -26.2 -28.5 -23.9 -23.9 -27.0 -24.6 -36.9 -28.2 -27.1 -31.1 -27.8 -29.9 -26.4 -27.4 -33.0 -34.1 -31.8

-26.7

956 1,339

668 390 166

2,311 738 581 929 384

1,165 509 648

2,549 19

118 845 304 422 530 251 184 161

720 45 48

352 29

695 830 554 363 821

1,445 451 320 632 228 722 298 397

1,391 14 68

466 251 217 383 139 286 224

878 283 67

397 77

17,361 12,894

-27.1 -25.9 -27.0 -33.5 -21.8 -22.9 -25.0 -25.5 -25.2 -26.2 -26.0 -26.0 -26.8 -23.6 -23.9 -24.9 -22.6 -34.2 -28.1 -27.1 -30.9 -27.6 -29.9 -21.0 -26.7 -32.5 -33.8 -31.8

-25.8

r-

:. r---, r-J

Table II-7.

r-1 ,-, -, r, r-1 r-) rI ' ,1 r--J 11 ..--,. rJ 11

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, IS-Month Cumulative 1984/85 Versus IS-Month Base Period


;-, -, ,-: - "

All Farms


Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent. (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)

New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida , et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Vall ey E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

2 4 7

30 33 36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 81 ack Hill s E. South Dakota

Iowa 3 Nashville

4 Southwest Plain s Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texas Central Arizona SW. I daho-E. Oregon

Orders Combined*

68 75 76 79 98

106 108 124 125 126 131 135

82

o 25 o

11 8

13 2

5 3 5

26 29 o 7

41 o o 1

o o

81 1

o

260


0.0 1.9 0.0 3.0 5.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.2 4.1 1.1 0.0 6.0 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0

11.4 2.2 0.0

1.6

See footnotes at. end of Table I I-B.

o 32 o

20 71 14

1 O§

4 3 7

O§

25 25 o 5

28 o o 1

o o

156 10 o

403

0.0 3.2 0.0 4.4 6.9 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.1 5.1 1.4 0.0 6.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0

15.4 2.7 0.0

2.7

0.0 24.3 0.0 .

27.1 28.4 28.0 7.9

17.0 17.9 14.3 24.5 97 . 1 45.8 15.1 0.0

26.1 69.8 0.0 0.0

108.3 0.0 0.0

29.9 6.4 0.0

29.8

956 1,285

658 351 145

2,270 728 570 887 371

1 ,157 496 610

2,506 18

109 767 422 519 244 184 161 632

44 48

16,138

100.0 98.1

100.0 97.0 94.8 99.4 99.7 99.8 99.4 99.2 99.6 99 . 8 95.9 98.9

100.0 94.0 94.9

100.0 100.0 99.6

100.0 100.0 88.6 97.8

100.0

98.4

865 985 685 429 960

1,761 552 392 757 273 886 362 464

1,696 17

75 527 268 467 169 354 276 854 348

83

14,506

100.0 96.8

100.0 95 . 6 93.1 99.2 99.8 99.9 99.4 99.0 99.3 99.9 94.9 98.6

100.0 94.0 95.0

100.0 100.0 99.4

100.0 100.0 84.6 97.3

100.0

97.3

-27 . 4 -27.4 -26.9 -34.6 -25.1 -23.2 -25.9 -26.2 -25.7 -26.6 -27.0 -26.7 -28.6 -24.7 -25.0 -27.7 -24.9 -28.6 -27.9 -31.5 -27.8 -30.3 -28.6 -27.4 -32.1

-26.7

956 1,310

658 362 153

2,283 730 571 892 374

1,162 497 636

2,535 18

116 808 422 519 245 184 161 713 45 48

16,398

865 1,018

685 449

1,031 1,774

553 392 762 276 893 362 489

1,721 17 80

555 268 467 170 354 276

1,010 358 83

14,908

-27.4 -26.4 -26.9 -33.2 -22.9 -23.0 -25.8 -26.2 -25.5 -26.3 -26.8 -26.6 -26.7 -24.3 -25.0 -25.8 -22.8 -28.6 -27.9 -31.3 -27.8 -30.3 -23.3 -26.8 -32.1

-25.8

" r-, ,..---,

Table II-8.

11 rJ ,---, r'" r, rl r1 r-, 11 rJ 11 ,---~ ;--,

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1985 Versus Second Quarter Base Period

rl r~ h


Average Average Average Federal Order Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change

Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (~cent) Number Percent pounds Perce~ Jperceilt~ Number pounds* (percent)

New England New York-New Jersey Georgia Chicago Regional Ohio Valley Indiana

2 St. Louis-Ozarks

1

2 7

30 33 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa

4 Southwest Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas

Orders Combined*

65 68 75 76 79

106 108 126

150 251 67

568 124

67 238 107 163 731

4

25 193 90 63

198

3,039


15.7 19.0 19.0 24.9 16.6 18.2 20.5 21.8 25.8 28.9 25.0 24.8 25.6 17.5 25.6 28.7

23.1

39 59 26

130 27 14 57 21 40

151 1

5 39 24 111

91

740

19.5 24.2 25.4 30.4 21.4 22.3 26.7 24.4 32.5 35.1 28.3 27.4 30.9 22.9 32.6 37.9

28.9

11.2 15.4 15.7 11.5 11.5 8.6

12.4 14.0 23.6 11.6 8.8

15.7 20.8 10.0 15.3 22.9

14.4

806 1,069

286 1,709

623 302 922 383 468

1,795 12 76

561 424 183 491

10,110

84.3 81.0 81.0 75.1 83.4 81.8 79.5 78.2 74.2 71.1 75.0 75.2 74.4 82.5 74.4 71.3

76.9

161 184

77 299 101 49

158 66 82

278 3

13 87 82 29

149

1,819

80.5 75.8 74.6 69.6 78.6 77.7

73.3 75.6 67.5 64.9 71.7

72.6 69.1 77 .1 67.4 62.1

71.1

-23.8 -26.3 -28.7 -21.0 -25.9 ,25.4 -23.9 -21.9 -23.0 -21.0 -19.8 -16.5 -21.3 -26.4 -29.0 -27.0

-23.8

Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).

956 200 -18.8 1,320 243 -19.3

353 103 -21.0 2,277 429 -13.3

747 128 -20 . 2 369 63 -19.8

1 ,160 215 -16.7 490 87 -15.4 631 122 -12.2

2,526 429 -12.0 16 4 -13.4

101 18 - 9.6 754 126 -11.8 514 107 -20.4 246 43 -18.8 689 240 -13.7

13,149 2,558 -15.7

2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).

3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisvi11e-Lexington-Evansville (#46); and Nashville (#98).


[

r [

r l

[

[

[

r [ [ r

[

l [ [

l

APPENDIX III

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984/85 Versus 1983/84

I 'I •

~ 11 .--, r-, r -1 ;---, ,-....-, r-l r-, ,-, r-, 11 rJ II .----, ,-....-, 11 ,...-, r-,

Table III-I. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings(MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1984 Versus First Quarter 1983 .




New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlant.ic 4 Georgi a 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

40 49 62

Great.er Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest. 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-MiSs. Nashville . 4 Southwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado

76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126 135 137

Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined*

120 242

70 47 36

371 110

87 95 85

114 78

116 338

5 20

176 66 31 58 16 15 10 76

8 26

4

2,420

* May not. add due to rounding.

12.6 16.8 10.2 10.4 21. 1

15.2 13.2 14.4 9.4

18.5 9.2

14.0 16.0 12.3 26.3 15.9 18.7 15.5 13.7

10.1 6.3 8.4 6.4 9.3

16.7 7.4

11.8

13.1


23 40 12 17 63 62· 16 12 16 13 19 12 20 49

3

26 20

4

11 3 5

4

27 3 9 3

493

12.0 17.9 8.2

14.3 24.1 16.1 12.8 14.1 9.6

18.2 9.8

14.5 17.8 12.5 38.0 16.8 19.5 25.5 12.6 10.3 7.4 7.3 7.2

10.7 17.7 8.7

14.0

14.2

10.8 12.0 12.8 17.8 11.4 9.4

12.5 14.5 8.9

10.8 7.6

16.4 13.6 11. 1

16.5 17.1 17.8 19.2 17.3 12.0 18.1 8.2 9.1

17.1 6.5

18.0 10.2

12.5

836 1,199

617 404 135

2,075 726

519

87.4 83.2 89.8 89.6 78.9 84.8 86.8 85.6

919 90.6 374 81.5

1,121 90.8 478 86.0 610 84.0

2,402 87.7 14 - 73.7

106 84.1 765 81.3 361 84.5 196 86.3 517 89.9 236 93.7 163 91.6 147 93.6 737 90.7

40 83.3 326 92.6

30 88.2

16,053 86.9

168 186 136 102 199 322 110 73

151 56

176 71 91

345 2

15 107

59 27 95 33

68 53

223 14 93 19

2,992

88.0 82.1 91.8 85.7 75.9 83.9 87.2 85.9 90.4 81.8 90.2 85.5 82.2 87.5 62.0 83.2 80.5 74.5 87.4 89.7 92.6 92.7 92.8 89.3 82.3 91.3 86.0

85.8

-20.6 -22.7 -20.6 -27.3 -18.6 -19.2 -22.1 -20.9 -22 .8 -23.6 -23.5 -22.8 -23.7 -20.6 -18.4 -23.0 -20.7 -26.1 -28.8 -23.0 -28.5 -23.4 -29.7 -25.3 -25.8 -29.8 -23.2

-22.6

956 1,441

687 451 171

2,446 836 606

1,014 459

1,235 556 726

2,740 19

126 941 427 227 575 252 178 157 813

48 352

34

191 226 148 119 263 383 126 85

167 69

195 83

110 394

4 18

133 79 31

106 36 73 57

249 18

101 22

18,473 3,486

-17.8 -18.2 -18.6 -23.1 -12.9 -15.6 -18.9 -17.3 -20.6 -19.0 -21 ;2 -18.8 -18.9 -17.6 - 7.9 -18.3 -15.3 -18.1 -25.0 -20.5 -26.4 -21.7 -27.8 -22.2 -21.6 -27.2 -19.8

-19.0

.---, II 11 :--J r, r--"1 11 r-,. 11 r-, r--J '-'. r--, 11 r---l

Table 111-2. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1984 Versus Second Quarter 1983


rJ iJ r-,

A 11 Farms



New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgi a 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Vall ey 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Mi dwes t Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa New Orleass-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Or egon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texa s

65 68 75 76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126

SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined*

63 163 39 32 17

262 74 50 86 44 72

60 63

213 5

10 130

32 21 56 16

13 10 93

4

31 o

1,659

* May not add due t o rounding.

6.6 11.4

5 . 8 7.0 9.9

10.7 8.8 8.1 8.5 9.6 5 .8

11. 1 9.1 7.8

26.3 8.0

14.3 7.5 9.9 9.7 6.3 7.2 6.4

11.3 8.3 8.8 0.0

9 . 0

See f ootnot es at end of Table 111-7.

12 29 7

10 37 46 12

6 12

7

12 .9 9

32 2 2

19 2 3

10 2 4 3

41 1

9

o

338

6.9 12.5 5.1 9.9

15.9 11. 7 9.7 7.5 7.6

10.2 6.2

11. 1

8.4 8.4

45.5 8.7

14.9 10.1 11. 1

9.5 7.1 5.6 5.2

17.2 8.3 8.5 0.0

10 . 2

9.4 12.7 10.3 22.5 22.1 9.0

17.7 10 .5 11.4 10.4 13.1 14.7 12.7 9.9 5.8

38.4 22 .8 25.1 20.8 11. 7 17.0

7.3 15.3 22.6 9.8

13.8 0.0

14.9

893 1,268

633 422 155

2,184 771

565 927 415

1,163 481 628

2,527 14

115 781 397 192 520 236 168 147 731

44 321 34

16,732

93.4 88.6 94.2 93.0 90.1 89.3 91.2 91.9 91.5 90.4 94.2 88.9 90.9 92.2 73.7 92.0 85.7 92.5 90.1 90.3 93 . 7 92.8 93. 6 88.7 91.7 91.2

100.0

91.0

162 201 131

92 195 345 110

77

150 60

179 70 97

353 2

17 110

15 24 94 33 69 54

199 16 93 21

2,967

93.1 87.5 94.9 90.1 84.1 88.3 90.3 92.5 92.4 89.8 93.8 88.9 91.6 91.6 54.5 91.3 85.1 89.9 88.9 90.5 92.9 94.4 94.8 82.8 91.7 91.5

100.0

89.8

-25.7 -25.9 -25.1 -31 . 8 -24 . 2 -22.2 -26 . 6 -25.9 -25 . 4 -26.5 -28.5 -28.5 -27.2 -24.9 -27.9 -27.5 -25.0 -33.4 -33.1 -26.5 -32.6 -32.8 -35.2 -28.6 -37.0 -30.3 -29.5

-26.7

956 1,431

672

454 172

174 230 138 102 232

2,446 391 845 121 615 83

1,013 162 459 66

1,235 191 541 78 691 106

2,740 385 19 4

125 18 911 129 429 17 213 26 576 103 252 35 181 73 157 57 824 241

48 17 352 102

34 21

18,391 3,304

-24.0 -22.6 -23.9 -28.6 -19.4 -19.5 -23.8 -24.0 -23.5 -23.9 -26.9 -25.4 -25.0 -22.8 -15.7 -24.4 -20.4 -30.0 -29.6 -24.0 -30 . 5 -31.3 -33.7 -23.1 -34.7 -27.9 -29.5

-23.9

.-, ., r-l ~ ,., 11 r,rr r-l r-, rJ r---'l .. ,--.,. r-, .& r-, ,--, ,.--, ;--]

Table 111-3. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Third Quarter 1984 Versus Third Quarter 1983




New England New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville

. 4 Southwest Plalns Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley

Orders Combined*

76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125

126 135 137 138

84 153 56 43 15

260 98 75 88 49

113 49 66

266

8 92 40 23 53 15 19 15 76

3 37 o

1,797


8.8 11.0 8.5 9.4 8.9

10.6 11.5 12.1 8.7

10.7 9.1 9.2 9.8 9.7 5.3 6.5

10.2 9.4

10.2 9.2 5.9

10.4 9.4 9.1 6.3

10.5 0.0

9.8

See footnotes at end of Table I I 1-7.

14 22 11

7

18 41 15 8

13 7

19 6 9

33 O§

12 8 3

10 2 6

4

30 1

10 o

314

8.8 10.7 8.4

10.7 10.3 11.3 13.3 10.9

8.2 13.2 10.6 8.8 9.4

10.2 5.0 6.7

10.7 14.3 12.4 10.6 7.3 8.9 7.6

14.3 5.3

10.2 0.0

10.4

10.0 21.4 12.7 22.8 18.1 10.2 11.5 10.0 11.3 12.4 15.8 15.3 18.1 9.8

10.3 9.0

32.1 17.2 16.~

21.0 25.4 14.5 10.5 29.3 16.6 10.9 0.0

15.7

872 1,243

606 416 154

2,186 753 545 925 410

1,122 483 606

2,474 18

116 806 387 203 524 238 163 . 144 755

45 315

34

16,544

91.2 89.0 91.5 90.6 91.1 89.4 88.5 87.9 91.3 89.~

90.9 90.8 90.2 90.3 94.7 93.5 89.8 90.6 89.8 90.8 94.1 89.6 90.6 90.9 93.8

· 89.5 100.0

90.2

148 180 124

59 161 322

97 68

146 49

157 67 91

294 3

15 104

47 23 85 29 65 52

177 16 91 20

2,691

91.2 89.3 91.6 89.3 89.7 88.7 86.7 89.1 91.8 86.8 89.4 91.2 90.6 89.8 95.0 93.3 89.3 85.7 87.6 89.4 92.7 91.1 92.4 85.7 94.7 89.8

100.0

89.6

-25.6 -26.8 -23.9 -35.1 -29.1 -23.2 -26.1 -26.3 -26.4 -27.1 -29.1 -28.4 -28.1 -25.4 -24.8 -29.8 -28.7 -32.8 -31. 9 -27.9 -30.1 -32.8 -36.3 -29.5 -38.2 -30.6 -30.7

-27.7

956 1,396

662 459 169

2,446 851

162 202 135

67 179 363 111

620 77

1,013 159 459 57

1 ,235 175 532 74 672 101

2,740 327 19 4

124 16 898 117 427 55 226 27 577 95 253 31 182 72 159 56 831 207

48 17 352 101

34 20

18,341 3,005

-23.5 -23.6 -21.8 -31.7 -26.0 -20.5 -22.7 -23.6 -24.3 -23.5 -26.1 -25.9 -25.4 -22.9 -23.6 -28.1 -25.0 -28.5 -28.2 -24.7 -27.8 -30.2 -34.1 -24.6 -36.6 -27.8 -30.7

-24.7

~ r-J rr 11 r--, r-J. ,.., 11 rJ r -, r-, 11 · rJr---"J :1

Table 1II-4. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Fourth Quarter 1984 Versus Fourth Quarter 1983


11 r-, r--"'

All Farms



New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

1

2 4 7

30 33 36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 68 Black Hil Is 75 E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texas SW. Idaho-E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grnnde Valley

Orders Combined*

76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138

129 207 118

72

21 306 117

79 94 51

113 54 91

385 3

18 112

49 31 61 34 18 20 99

7

45 1

2,335


13.5 15.1 17.9 15.6 11.8 12.5 13.7 12.4 9.3

11.0 9.1

10.4 13.8 14.1 15.8 15.1 13 .1 16.1 13.8 10.6 12.6 9.9

12.4 11.7 14.6 12.8 2.9

12.8

See footnotes at end of Table I I 1-7.

22 29 28 17 40 44 19

8 13

8 16

7

13 49

O§

3 16

9

4 10

4

5 7

35 2

12

~§

421

13.3 15.3 20.4 18.0 20.1 13.2 17.8 11.0 9.0

14.4 9.5 9.8

13.4 15.3 14.7 16.8 14.5 17.2 13.7 11.6 13 .1

8.1 12.8 16.4 10.1 12.7 0.7

14.2

12.7 17.5 11.6 25.8 16.6 10.4 16.2 15.5 16.1 12.9 15.6 17.9 10.0 11.4 4.0

10.7 19.5 20.2 15.0 11.8 19.1 13.6 14.6 24.4 9.5

12.8 9.8

15.2

827 1,161

540 390 157

2,140 737

556 918 411

1,122 465 568

2,355 16

101 744 255 193 517 235 16~

141 748

41 307

33

15,644

86.5 64 . 9 62.1 84.4 68.2 87.5 86.3 87.6 90.7 69.0 90.9 69.6 66.2 85.9 84.2· 64.9 66.9 83.9 86.2 69.4 67.4 90.1 87.6

68.3 85.4 87.2 97.1

67.2

146 161 111

78 156 289

89 66

137 46

155 65 84

271 3

13 94 42 22 80 28 61 45

177 14 81 17

2,534

86.7 84.7 79.6 82.0 79.9 86.8 82.2 69.0 91.0 85.6 90.5 90.2 86.6 84.7 85.3 83.2 65.5 82.8 86.3 68.4 86.9 91. 9 87.2 63.6 69.9 87.3 99.3

85.8

-22.3 -25.3 -19.9 -27.1 -26.9 -21.5 -25.1 -24.7 -24.4 -25.6 -26.8 -26.4 -25.9 -23.8 -27.0 -28.0 -25.0 -34.2 -35.6 -28.1 -29.2 -27.0 -28.9 -27.2 -31.6 -28.6 -27.3

-25.5

956 168 -19.0 1,368 190 -20.9

658 139 -15.0 462 95 -21.2 178 198 -22.8

2,446 334 -18.4 854 108 -20.1 635 75 -21.7

1,012 150 -21.9 462 54 -21.9

1,235 171 -24.1 519 72 -23.6 659 97 -22.5

2,740 320 -19.9 19 3 -23.7

119 16 -23.5 856 110 -20.7 304 51 -28.7 224 26 -31.5 578 91 -25.0 269 32 -25.2 182 66 -24.8 161 52 -25.3 847 211 -21.9

48 15 -26.9 352 92 -25.1

34 18 -27.1

18,179 2,954 -21.6

,---

~ rJ ,....-., r---'} r-, ,. ;-, r---, r-, ,--, ,..., ,..., . 11 r-, -, 11

Table 1II-5. Number of Farms and Milk Harketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1985 Versus First Quarter 1984


r-1 1 r-l

All Farms




2 4 7

30 33 36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest Black Hills E. Sout.h Dakota

Iowa 3 Nashvi11 e

4 Southwest Plains

68 75 76 79 98

106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget Sound-Inland 1~5

4 . Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135

Orders Combined*

324 426 269 147

52 786 203 166 264 108 351 158 269 722

9

36 253 135 161

91 60 47

245 8

12

5,302


33.9 31.9 41.1 37.4 33.8 34.2 27.7 28.7 29.2 28.2 30.2 31.3 41.5 28.5 50.0 30.3 30.4 32.0 30.7 36.4 32.6 29.2 32.4 17.8 25.0

31.9


68 73 64 41 83

134 32 23 47 15 57 26 45

111 2 6

38 20 32 14 24 14 52 18

6

1,044

39.7 36.3 46.7 41.2 38.9 38.7 30.7 30.4 32.2 29.5 32.9 36.8 46.5 32.9 46.1 37.0 35.5 37.8 35.6 41.3 35.5 27.4 34.9 23.5 35.2

36.2

10.3 16.9 13.8 21.8 10.0 11.9 11. 1

12.3 11.3 12.0 12.9 12.1 16.7 12.2 6.6

18.7 11.8 14.0 11.7 13~0

10.1 14.5 16.8 12.8 19.9

13.0

632 911 386 246 102

1 ,512 529 413 640 275 813 347 379

1,815 9

83 580 287 364 159 124 114 512 37 36

11,305

66.1 .68.1 58.9 62.6 66.2 65.8 72.3 71.3 70.8 71.8 69.8 68.7 58.5 71.5 50.0 69.7 69.6 68.0 69 . 3 63.6 67 . 4 70.8 67.6 82.2 75.0

68.1

103 127 73 59

131 212

73 52 98 37

116 44 52

227 2

10 70 32 58 20 43 38 98 57 11

1,842

60.3 63.7 53.3 58.8 61.1 61.3 69.3 69.6 67.8 70.5 67.1 63.2 53.5 67.1 53.9 63.0 64.5 62.2 64.4 58.7 64.5 72.6 65.1 76.5 64.8

63.8

-14.9 -18.3 -14.9 -21.7 -23.4 -15.5 -18.6 -18.6 -18.0 -18.4 -17.5 -19.7 -17.6 -18.4 -13.0 -18.2 -21.3 -23.1 -19.0 -18.2 -14.9 -13.1 -20.5 -13.9 -17.8

-18.2

956 1,337

655 393 154

2,290 732 579 904 383

1,164 505 648

2,537 18

119 833 422 525 250 184 161 757 45 48

171 200 138 100 214 345 105 75

145 52

173 70 98

338 3

16 108 52 90 34 67 52

150 75 16

16,607 2,886

- 6.4 - 8.3 - 3.5

8.2 -13.1 - 6.7 -11.3 -11.1 -10.4 -11 .3 - 9.5 -10.3 - 4.5 -10.4 - 4.9 - 7.6 -12.0 -12.3 -10.2 - 7.7 - 7.4 - 7.0 -10.5 - 8.9 - 7.6

- 9.1

.--., ~ r-, ,---, r-, r., r-, -, r-l r--, ,,--, rJ h ~ r ., ;-, rJ r--, r--,

Table III-6. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984 Versus 1983

Increasing Marketings Decreasing Marketings A 11 Farms Farms Marketings Farms Marketings


Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent.)

New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan

2

4 7

30 33 36 40 49 Indiana 2

St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Bl ack Hi 11 s E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington

65 68 75 76 79 94 98

106 108 124

Puget4Sound-lnland 125

Texas 126 SW. I daho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined*

41 111 37 25 11

116 51 46 44 27 32 29 29

102 2 6

78 31 18 27 11 13 9

53 2

16

968


4.3 8.3 5.6 6.4 6.4 5.0 6 . 9 7.9 4.7 7.0 2.7 5.7 4.5 4.0

10.5 5.1 9.2

10.1 7.6 5'.1 4.4 7.1 5.6 7.1 4.2 4.5 3.4

5.6


29 67 24 25 87 73 26 18 28 17 20 17 16 57

2

4

45 24 8

17 6

16 11 89

3

20 2

752

4.1 8.1 4.4 6.8

10.2 5.0 5.9 5.7 4.5 7.5 2.8 5.8 4.0 4.1

12.9 5.6 9.6 9.5 7.1 4 . 5 4.2 5.5 4.9 9.9 4.0 5.1 3.2

6.0

6.3 12.3 17.6 19.0 14.7 7.0

11.3 11.1

9.1 6.4

14.6 14.6 8.0 7.6 2.6

11.3 15.9 16.8 25.3 12 . 5 25.4 9.0

48.6 24.7 4.2

15.9 0.7

13.7

915 1,231

6'23 366 161

2,195 687 535 884 357

1 ,133 480 619

2,447 17

112 767 276 220 503 240 169 152 690

46 336

28

16,189

95.7 91.7 94.4 93.6 93.6 95.0 93.1 92.1 95.3 93.0 97.3 94.3 95.5 96.0 89.5 94.9 90.8 89.9 92.4 94.9 95.6 92.9 94.4 92.9 95.8 95.5 96.6

94.4

666 765 528 339 766

1,372 424 302 602 211 702 281 381

1,333 12 64

422 229 108 365 133 270 214 813

64 377

75

11 ,817

95.9 91.9 95.6 93.2 89.8 95.0 94.1 94.3 95.5 92.5 97.2 94.2 96.0 95.9 87.1 94.4 90.4 90.5 92.9 95.5 95.8 94.5 95.1 90.1 96.0 94.9 96.8

94.0

-23.2 -21.8 -20.6 -28.0 -22.6 -19.3 -21.9 -21.5 -22.3 -23.3 -24.9 -23.9 -23.4 -21.2 -20.3 -24.2 -22.2 -26.2 -34.8 -23.8 -28.4 -25.1 -27.9 -24.3 -28.7 -28.1 -25.7

-23.1

956 1,342

660 391 172

2,311 738 581 928 384

1,165 509 648

2,549 19

118 845 307 238 530 251 182 161 743

1t8

352 29

17,157

695 832 553 363 853

1,445 451 320 631 228 722 298 397

1,391 14 68

466 253 116 383 139 286 224 902

67 397

77

12,569

-22.3 -19.9 -19.4 -26.0 -19.9 -18.3 -20.6 -20.2 -21.3 -21.7 -24.1 -22.3 -22.5 -20.3 -17.9 -22.8 -19.7 -23.6 -32.5 -22.7 -27.0 -23.7 -26.1 -21.3 -27.8 -26.7 -25.1

-21.6

---, r--l 11 ('""J ...--, r--'J' r, 11 r-, r-j r 1 ,.., , 11 r - 1

Table 111-7. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (MDP Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1985 Versus Second Quarter 1984


r-, 11 1

All Farms



New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Georgi a 7 Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Bl ack Hi 11 s E. South Dakota

Iowa 4 Southwest Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas

Orders Combined*

65 68 75 76 79

106 108 126

650 935 265

1,687 497 253 849 374 513

1,938 14 84

562 355 176 456

9,608


70.3 70.8 72.8 74.3 67.3 69.1 73.3 76,3 81.3 77 .0 87.5 83.2 74.5 69.2 71.5 61.6

73.1

159 191 87

353 98 50

176 73

107 362

3 17

103 85 35

186

2,085

81.2 78.2 81.:3 82.3 77 .0 80.7 81.9 83.7 87.3 84.6 78.0 91.2 81.4 79.4 82.1 71.8

81.0

26.5 25.5 30.8 24.2 23.3 22.8 26.8 27.2 32.8 27.1 20.1 30.3 27.3 24.3 36.5 27.1

26.6

275 385 99

584 241 113 310 116 118 580

2

17 192 158

70 284

3,544

29.7 29.2 27.2 25.7 32.7 30.9 26.7 23.7 18.7 23.0 12.5 16.8 25.5 30.8 28.5 38.4

26.9

37 53 20 76 29 12 39 14 15 66

2 23 22 8

73

490

18.8 21.8 18.7 17.7 23.0 19.3 18.1 16.3 12.7 15.4 22.0 8.8

18.6 20.6 17.9 28.2

19.0

-15.8 -18.2 -18.7 -12.6 -15.9 -17.8 -19.9 -15.3 -16.8 -16.4 - 9.6 -14.0 -15.1 -18.1 -14.9 -19.9

-16.9

1 Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).

925 196 1,320 245

364 106 2,271 429

738 127 366 62

1,159 215 490 87 631 122

2,518 428 16 4

101 18 754 126 513 107 246 43 740 259

13,152 2,575

15.6 12.4 17.4 15.6 11.3 12.1 14.7 17.6 23.5 17 .. 6

12.0 24.7 16.4 12.3 23.2 9.0

15.1

2 Datil for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).

3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisville-Lexington-Evansvil1e (#46); and Nashville (#98).


r--J

l

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

[

l [

[

[

[

~..PPENDIX IV

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984/85 Versus 1983/84

I tl '

-, ..--, 11

Table IV-I.

11 rJ 11 r 1 :- 1 r- 1 r-, ,--, 'rJ ,---, ,-, r-,

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1984 Versus First Quarter 1983


Average Average

r"'J rJ 11

All Farms

Average Federal Order Million change Million change Million change

Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (per cent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)

New England New York-New Jersey t~iddle Atlantic Georgia 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Vall ey E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan

2

4

7

30 33 36 40 49 Indiana , 2

St. LOuls - 0zarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa New Orleass-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland


Order s Combined*

65 68 75 76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138

3,239 9,108 3,263

495 88

8,402 1,988 3,187 3,259 1,095 1,223

372 593

5,615 29

156 1,556

401 225 403 236 427 788 864

97 341

59

47,509

* May not add due to roundjng.

58.9 63.9 54.5 50.8 44.4 60.0 46.5 60.2 69.8 58.3 54.5 52 . 3 55.9 53.8 51.8 59 . 3 59 . 8 15 . 8 48.6 53 . 7 50.9 59.0 65.2 56.1 49.5 45.3 69.4

57.1

See foo tnotes at end of Table IV-7.

727 1,824

765 188 171

1,681 343 519 742 200 233

71 120

1,028 6

32 285 131

34 107 48

231 423 387

53 144 144

10,637

64.1 70.4 58.2 63.4 79.7 64.8 58.2 66.0 78.1 64.2 59.8 57.4 61.5 58.1 50.9 66.5 64.7 56.1 54.5 62.5 55.0 69.3 71.7 66.1 58.4 54.3 75.2

65.0

16.3 15.9 13.4 20.1 16.0 13.4 16.9 17.0 21.7 17.1 16.6 17.5 17.0 12.7 48.1 16.7 19.2 23.3 20.1 19 . 8 25.5 15.0 14.1 22.9 20.5 13.0 18.2

16.1

2,259 5,145 2,719

480 110

5,601 2,288 2,108 1,409

784 1,023

339 468

4,831 27

107 1,044 2,134

238 348 228 297 421 676

99 412

26

35,623

41.1 36.1 45.5 49.2 55.6 40.0 53.5 39.8 30.2 41.7 45.5 47.7 44.1 46.2 48.2 40.7 40.2 84.2 51.4 46.3 49.1 41.0 34.8 43.9 50.5 54.7 30.6

42.9

408 765 549 108

44 913 ,246 267 208 111 157

53 75

741 6

16 155 102

28 64 39

102 167 198 38

121 47

5,731

35.9 29.6 41.8 36.6 20.3 35.2 41.8 34.0 21.9 35.8 40.2 42.6 38.5 41.9 49.1 33.5 35.3 43.9 45.5 37.5 45.0 30.7 28.3 33.9 41.6 45.7 24.8

35.0

-10.9 -11.6 -10.5 -20.1 -20.3 -11.1 -15.0 -12 . 9 -11 .7 -14.7 -14.3 -14.7 -16.3 -11.4 -12.7 -20.3 -13.7 -20.2 -16.7 -14.4 -17.7 -11. 6 -10.8 -13.4 -18.1 -14.2 -10.7

-12.5

5,498 14,253 5,982

975 198

14,003 4,276 5,295 4,668 1,879 2,246

711

1 ,061 10,446

56 263

2,600 2,535

463 751 464 724

1,209 1,540

196 753

85

83,132

1 ,1 36 2,590 1,314

296 214

2,594 589 785 950 311 390 124 196

1,769 12 48

440 233 62

171 87

334 • 590

585 91

265 191

16,368

4.8 6.1 2.0 1.4 6.2 3.4 1.0 4.8

12.4 .3.3 1.9 1.2 1.5 1.2

10.4 1.0 5.0

- 0.5 0.0 4.2 1.5 5 .. 3 5.8 7.7 0.7

- 1.3 9.4

4.1

rJ

r -1 rJ r-l r--, r ~ 1 11 rJ .-, rJ r , '-, ,--, .---, , r 1

Table IV-2. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants.), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1984 Versus Second Quarter 1983


:J \I 11

All Farms


Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent . pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds* (percent)

New England New York-New Jersey Middle Atlantic Georgi a . 1 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional Ohio Valley E. Ohio-W. Penn. Southern Michigan Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks

2

4

7

30 33 36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashvill e

4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland


Orders Combin~d*

68 75 76 79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138

2,732 7,812 2,774

435 96

7,335 1,825 2,921 2,697

930 1,054

328 484

5,217 30

125 1,368

263 166 406 216 423 711 991

92 341

57

41,829


48.9 54.9 46.8 43.5 49 . 0 52.4 38.6 53.2 57.8 49.5 46.9 47.1 46.6 49.9 53.6 48.4 53.8 10.0 36.2 52.1 46.3 57.6 58.2 63.4 46.7 45.8 64.0

49.9

See footnotes at end of Table IV-7.

602 1,654

656 153 159

1,571 329 499 608 176

220 · 68 107 991

8

26 262

24 26

117 49

245 416 509

64 160 141

9,838

53.5 60.9 50.4 54.5 75.9 57.4 50.4 59.5 61.6 55.3 53.8 53.4 52.1 54.3 5~.5

50.9 57.5 42.8 40.2 64.5 52.8 67.3 66.6 76.0 59.1 56.4 66.1

58.2

13.7 13.8 11.9 20.2 17.0 12.2 17.9 15.2 13.6 15.0 15 . 6 16.5 16.1 11.8 25.6 14.4 16.7 17.8 15.1 20.2 23.9 13.9 12.7 31.3 17.6 13.6 14.7

14.6

2,860 6,430 3,155

565 100

6,668 2,903 2,572 1,967

949 1,192

368 555

5,229 26

133 1,175 2,357

292 3}3 251 312 510 571 105 403

32

42,053

51.1 45.1 53.2 56.5 51.0 47.6 61.4 46.8 42.2 50.5 53.1 52.9 53.4 50.1 46.4 51.6 46.2 90.0 63.8 47.9 53.7 42.4 41.8 36.6 53.3 54.2 36.0

50.1

523 1,060

646 127

51 1,164

324 340 379 142 189 59 98

833 7

25 194

32 38 65 44

119 209 160

44 124

72

7,069

46.5 39.1 49.6 45.5 24.1 42.6 49.6 40.5 38.4 44.7 46.2 46.6 47.9 45.7 45.5 49.1 42.5 57.2 59.8 35.5 47.2 32.7 33.4 24.0 40.9 43.6 33.9

41.8

-11.8 -12.3 -11.3 -21.0 -14.6 -12.0 -18.9 -14.0 -11.4 -15.6 -15.9 -17.2 -17.1 -12.6 -15.1 -16.9 -14.4 -21.3 -17.2 -16.9 -19.5 -11 .1

-13.4 -13.3 -17.7 -14.7 - 9.9

-13.3

5,592 14,242 5,929 1,000

196 14,003 4,728 5,493 4,664 1,879 2,246

696 1,039

10,446 56

258 2,543 2,620

458 779 467 735

1 ,221 1,562

197 744

89

83,882

1,125 2,714 1,302

280 210

2,735 653 839 986 318

• 409 128 205

1,824 14 51

456 57 63

182 94

364 624 669 108 284 213

16,907

0.2 1.9

- 0.9 - 2.8

7.4 0.4

- 3.8 1.3 2.5

- 1.0 - 1.5 - 2.0 - 2.6 - 0.8

3. i - 3.5

1.1 - 8.3 - 6.7

3.8 - 1.3

4.3 2.4

16.9 0.1

- 0.7 5.0

1.0

II

,.., ,---,

Table IV-3.

.---, r--l 11 ,.-, , r-, ;--, 11 r-J , r - 1 , ,. 1

Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Third Quarter 1984 Versus Third Quarter 1983


r--1 11 ,--,

All Farms


Name No. Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number Percent pounds Percent (percent) Number pounds~ (percent)

New England New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 beorgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. ~6

Southern Michigan 40 Indiana 2 49 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Great.er Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest. 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakot.a 76 Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville ~

Southwest Plains ' Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington Puget

4Sound-lnland

Texas SW. I daho- E. Oregon Colorado Rio Grande Valley

Orders Combined*

79 94 98

106 108 124 125 126 135 137 138

2,581 6,738 2,413

481 84

6,649 1,934 2,638 2,354

835 1,008

296 428

4,977 20 98

1,020 357 211 373 216

432 707 905 107 377

48

38,287


45.2 47.6 41.3 45.1 45.7 47.5 41.9 47.3 50.5 44.4 44.9 42.7 42.3 47.6 35.7 38.7 40.6 13.8 46.1 46.8 44.5 57.4 57 . 4 56.0 51.9 50.4 53.3

45.6


550 1,283

559 109 116

1,370 329 422 560 159 202 58 92

844 5

19 178

99 31 99 44

254 423 405

76 186 115

8,587

52.2 52.8 44.8 57.5 67.4 53.6 54.3 53.8 57.0 53 . 3 52.9 47.6 46.5 54.2 37.1 39.8 44.2 54.4 50.9 58.3 54.1 69.8 67.9 69.6 64.6 64.5 53.9

54.6

13.8 13.5 12.3 i 8.1 19.2 12.5 17.2 14.5 12.6 15.2 15.9 14.1 15.7 13.2 18.0 18.0 17.4 21.4 16.6 20.4 24.2 13.5 14.5 24.5 21.6 14.1 17.0

14.6

3,128 7,425 3,423

585 100

7,354 2,677 2,935 2,309 1,044 1,237

398 584

5,469 36

155 1,493 2,239

247 424 269 320 524 711

99 371

42

45 , 608

54.8 52.4 58.7 54.9 54.3

. 52.5 58.1 52.7 49.5 55.6 55.1 57.3 57.7 52.4 64.3 61.3 59.4 86.2 53.9 53.2 55.5 42.6 42.6 44.0 48.1 49.6 46.7

54.4

503 1,147

689 81 56

1,185 277 362 423 139 180

64 105 713

9

29 224 83 30 71 37

110 200

177 41

102 98

7,135

47.8 47.2 55.2 42.5 32.6 46.4 45.7 46.2 43.0 46.7 47.1 52.4 53.5 45.8 62.9 60.2 55.8 45.6 49.1 41. 7 45.9 30.2 32.1 30.4 35.4 35.5 46.1

45.4

-12.5 -13.0 -12.0 -21.5 -13 .6 -12.5 -19.0 -13.6 -12.4 -15.7 -16.3 -17.6 -17.0 -13 .1

-17 .6

-13.8 -18.5 -29.3 -18.4 -15.1 -19.5 -13.7 -12.9 -15.0 -15 . 7 -16.0 - 8.5

-13.9

5,709 14,163 5,836 1,066

184 14,003 4,611 5,573 4,663 1,879 2,245

694 1 ,012

10,446 56

253 2,513 2,596

458 797 485 752

1,231 1,616

206 748

90

1,053 2,430 1,248

190 171

2,556 606 784 982 298 381 123 197

1,557 14 48

402 181

61 171

81 365 623 582 117

289 214

83,895 15,723

- 0.4 - 0.8 - 2.6 - 2.7

6.1 - 0.6 - 2.6 - 0.4

0.3 - 1.6 - 1.9 - 5.0 - 4.4 - 0.5 - 7.2 - 3.4 - 5.8 - 8.5 - 3.7

2.5 - 0.6

3.6 4.0 9.1 5.1 1.2 3.7

- 0.4

r,

,-, .--, r-l rJ r 1 :- , rJ , ;, r-J ;---, -, r-l --, r-,

Table IV-4. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Fourth Quarter 1984 Versus Fourth Quarter 1983


r-J rJ r-l

All Farms

Average Average Average Federa 1 Order Mill i on change Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change


New England New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia. 1 7 SE. Florlda, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40 Indi ana 49 St. Louis-Ozarks

2 62

Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest. 68 Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 New Orlea~s-Miss. 94 Nashville 4 98 Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget

4Sound-lnland 125

Texas 126 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined*

2,643 6,360 2,838

427 82

6,827 2,018 2,682 2,226

830 986 283 453

5,276 21

127 1,137

320 219 368 226 433 693 842 116 312

42

38,787


45.1 45.4 48.9 39.5 45.3 48.8 42.4 46.6 47.7 44.2 43.9 41.3 45.9 50.5 37.5 50.6

. 50.5 40.3 48.1 45.6 46.2 56.7 55.6 50.3 55.5 41.7 45.7

47.2


610 1,188

696 136 144

1,360 337 431 524 157 199

61 101 916

6 28

201 83 34

101 45

223 416 371

80 144 110

8,700

55.8 50.9 54.5 50.9 67.7 57.0 57.0 55.9 55.9 54.1 53.7 50.1 53.5 58.8 45.0 59.2 56.2 48.4 54.8 59 . 1 55.4 65.7 70.1 64.9 68.5 54.4 54.0

56.5

13.0 12.8 10.9 22.2 19.7 12.1 17.0 14.8 11.6 13.8 14.9 14.3 15.1 12.8 11. 1 17.9 15.5 19.9 17 .2 17.5 21.0 13.7 14.3 21.9 18.1 15.7 17.0

13.9

3,219 7,658 2,961

655 99

7,176 2,746 3,073 2,442 1,046 1,259

403 535

5,170 35

124 1 ,115

474 236 439 263 330 554 831

93 437

50

43,425

54.9 54.6 51.1 60.5 54.7 51.2 57.6 53.4 52 . 3 55.8 56.1 58.7 54.1 49.5 62.5 49.4 49.5 59.7 51.9 54.4 53.8 43.3 44.4 49.7 44.5 58.3 54.3

52.8

483 1,145

580 132 68

1,024 255 340 413 133 172

61 88

642 7

19 157

89 28 70 36

116 177 201 37

120 93

6,686

44.2 49.1 45.5 49.1 32.3 43.0 43.0 44.1 44.1 45.9

. 46.3 49.9 46.5 41.2 55.0 40.8 43.8 51.6 45.2 40.9 44.6 34.3 29.9 35.1 31.5 45.6 46.0

43 .5

-12.3 -13.4 -11.5 -21.3 -14.2 -11.9 -17.7 -13.9 -12.5 -15.4 -16.2 -17.5 -17.8 -12.8 -18.7 -13.1 -14.3 -29.3 -21 . 2 -16.4 -18.9 -11.0 -13.6 -15.8 -14.6 -15.1 - 8.1

-13.8

5,862 14,018 5,799 1,082

181 14,003 4,764 5,755 4,668 1,876 2,245

686 988

10,446 56

251 2,252

794 455 807 489 763

1,247 1,673

209 749

92

1,093 2,334 1,276

268 212

2,384 591 771 936 290 371 122 188

1,558 12 47

358 172

62 170

81 339 593 573 117 264 203

82,212 15,385

0.2 - 1.8 - 0.6 - 3.9

6.1 0.3

- 1.0 0 . 1

- 0.5 - 1.8 - 2.0 - 4.1 - 3.0

0.6 7.5 2.9 0.2

-11.8 - 4.0

0.8 - 0.8

3.8 4.3 5.3 5.4

- 0.7 3.9

- 0.1

r-J

--, 11 r-J rJ 11 r--, ,--, rJ :1 r--, ;---, rJ r-J ,--., rl ,., r--)

Table IV-5. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, First Quarter 1985 Versus First Quarter 1984

Federal Order Name No.

New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Middle Atlantic 4 Georgia 1 7 SE. Florida, et al. Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33 E. Ohio-W. Penn. 36 Southern Michigan 40

49 Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest

65 68

Black Hills 75 E. South Dakota 76 Iowa 79 Nashvi1le

3 4 98

Southwest Plains 106 Central Arkansas 108 Oregon-Washington 124 Puget

4Sound-lnland 125

Texas 126 Central Arizona 131 SW. I daho-E. Oregon 135

Orders Combined*

Number

2,637 6,098 3,199

470 114

6,667 2,070 2,469 2,149

826 1,109

366 583

4,687 36

149 1,197

399 394 239 447 709 793 59

117

37,983


Increasing Marke~~s Farms Marketings

Mill ion Average change

Percent pounds Percent (percent)

44.6 44.2 54.5 50.5 65.5 50.8 49.7 46.6 47.7 48.9 52.6 54.0 59.9 47.8 63.2 59.4 54.4 50.6 55.7 54.3 59.0 56.9 55.8 57.8 59.7

49.2

621 1,240

806 165 184

1,398 354 429 520 158 226 76

129 912

10 35

229 71

111 53

239 424 256 175

81

8,901

55.5 49.8 61.0' 58.6 67.1 56.0 58.1 53.9 55.9 55.1 59.6 62.5 66.5 53.8 72.0

68.9 60.6 58.8 64.9 62.2 69.4 70.4 63.6 70.4 78.1

57.4

13.0 12.6 14.2 21. 1 16.2 11.5 17.1 13.5 12.1 13.8 14.6 17.1 14.0 12.0 15.5 20.5 14.5 17.4 16.4 19.6 13.7 13.7 19.5 15.5 19 . 8

13.7


Number

3,269 7,683 2,674

460 60

6,457 2,095

- 2,830 2,356

863 999 312 391

5,128 21

102 1,004

390 313 201 310 536 629 43 79

39,205

Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Marketings

Average Average Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change

Percent pound_s_ Percent _ ~cent_) _ Num~r pouDds* (percent)

55.4 55.8 45.5 49.5 34.5 49.2 50.3 53.4 52.3 51.1 47.4 46.0 40.1 52.2 36.8 40.6 45.6 49.4 44.3 45.7 41.0 43.1. 44.2 42.2 40.3

50.8

499 1,248

516 117 90

1,100 255 367 409 129 153

46 65

781 4

16 149 50 60 32

105 178 147 74 23

6,611

44.5 50.2 39.0 41.4 32.9 44.0 41.9 46.1 44.1 44.9 40.4 37.5 33.5 46.2 28.0 31.1 39.4 41.2 35.1 37.8 30.6 29.6 36.4 29.6 21.9

42.6

-11.8 -13.1 -11.8 -18.3 -12.0 -11.0 -15.7 -13.7 -12.6 -14.8 -14.1 -16.1 -18.0 -12.0 -10.9 -12.5 -16.4 -14.5 -15.3 -19.3 -11.3 -11.0 -15.9 -14.4 -12.5

-12.9

5,906 13,781 5,873

930 174

13,124 4,165 5,299 4,505 1,689 2,108

678 974

9,815 57

251 2,201

789 707 440 757

1,245 1,422

102 196

1,120 2,488 1,323

281 274

2,498 609 795 929 287 379 122 194

1,693 13 51

378 120 170

85 344 602 403 249 104

77,188 15,513

0.4 - 2.0

2.4 0.9 5.1 0.3 0.7

- 0.9 - 0.3 - 1. 1

1.0 2.0 0.8

- 0.5 6.6 7.8 0.0

1.8 2.9 1.2 4.7 5.1 3.7 4.7

10.8

0.6

II I

--. r, .--, ,--, 11' r., ~--, ,-, . ;-, r--J r-J r • .. r--J ---., ' r-1 r-- r-, -r--) :

Table IV-6. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, 1984 Versus 1983

Federal Order Name


No.

2 4 7

30 33 36 40 49 62

Greater Kansas Cit.y 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa 65 Upper Midwest 61 ack Hi 11 s E. South Dakota Iowa New Orlea~s-Miss. Nashville 4 Southwest Plains Central Arkansas Oregon-Washington

68 75 76

79 94 98

106 108 124

Puget4Sound-lnland 125

Texas 126 SW. Idaho-E. Oregon 135 Colorado 137 Rio Grande Valley 138

Orders Combined*

Number

2,976 7,759 2,753

452 93

7,413 1,957 3,053 2,635

922 1,055

299 463

5,311 26

116 1,198

349 202 404 238 470 778

966 107 318

53

42,366


Increasing Marketings Farms Marketings

Mill ion Average change

Percent pounds Percent (percent)

50.9 55.8 47.3 50.8 47.7 56.2 49.2 57.3 57.8 54.1 50.4 44.3 47.9 54.0 46.4 46.6 54.3 43.5 43.4 56.5 53.2 61.6 62.4 69.1 51.2 42.0 63.9

54.0

2,553 6,116 2,598

572 620

6,079 1,338 1,985 2,395

688 833 238 401

3,806 25

102 840 397 121 443 191

1,012 1,794 1,752

277 615 545

38,335

56.9 61.4 51.0 58.2 74.7 60.4 55.6 61.7 62.7 58.4 55.2 49.1 53.2 57.9 46.6 54.0 56.8 49.9 48.0 64 . 6 56.1 71. 2 73.0 74.3 62.0 56.2 66.8

60.1

11.4 11. 1 10.2 15.9 16.7 8.7

13.2 11.3 9.5

10.9 11.2 11.7

11.2 8.5

18.0 11.6 12.9 18.0 11.6

16.8 19.6 14.5 12.9 23.7 22.9 11 .5 13.9

11 .6 .


Number

2,869 6,146 3,069

438 102

5,784 2,023 2,271 1,927

781 1,039

376 504

4,524 30

133 1,007

453 263 311 209 293 469 432 102 439

30

36,024

Decreasing Marketings All Farms Farms Market.ings

Average Average Mi 11 i on change Mi 11 i on change

Percent pounds Percent (per~e~Number pouncjs* (percent)

49.1 44.2 52.7 49.2 52.3 43.8 50.8 42.7 42.2 45.9 49.6 55.7 52.1 46.0 53.6 53.4 45.7 56.5 56.6 43.5 46.8 38.4 37.6 30.9 48.8 58.0 36.1

46.0

1,935 3,845 2,492

412 209

3,984 1,069 1,233 1,423

490 676 247 353

2,765 28 87

639 399 131 243 149 409 664 606 169 479 271

25,409

43.1 38.6 49.0 41.8 25.3 39.6 44.4 38.3 37.3 41.6 44.8 50.9 46.8 42.1 53.4 46.0 43.2 50.1 52.0 35.4 43.9 28.8 27.0 25.7 38.0 43.8 33.2

39.9

-10.6 - 8.4 - 8.4 -15.3 - 9.7 - 8.2 -11.9 - 9.8 - 8.4 -11 .6 -11 .4 -11.9 -12.9 - 8.5 -13.0 -11.5 - 9.9 -18.3 -14.0 -11.9 -11.7 -12.6 -15.6 - 9.5 -19.3 -13.4 - 8.3

- 9.9

5,845 13,905 5,822

890 195

4,488 9,961 5,091

984 830

13 ,197 10,062 3,980 2,406 5,324 3,218 4,562 3,818 1,703 1,178 2,094

675 967

9,835 56

249 2,205

802 465 715 447 763

1,247 1,398

209 757

83

1,510 486 754

6,572 53

188 1,479

796 251 686 340

1,421 2,459 2,358

446 1,094

817

78,390 63,745

0.7 2.7 0.2 0.4 8.7 1.3 0.5 2.2 2.1 0.3

- 0.2 - 1.7 - 1.6

0.7 - 0.9

0.4 1.8

- 3.5 - 3.4

4.7 3.5 5.1 3.5

13.0 2.5

- 1.0 5.4

1.9

-. r--1 .--, r--1 r-J iJ ' r-l r r-, :~ : ' r-, ,r-1 , r-1 r ~ 1 " r-, r--J " - '. --...~ "'> ',1 . . • :"_ ... ..;, ;,

'~~4 _ , ~ : , . : :

........ ...: ...:..:. .. -"'- -.... -

Table IV-7. Number of Farms and Milk Marketings (Non-Participants), by Their Change in Marketings, Second Quarter 1985 Versus Second Quarter 1984

-_. '-- -"'--"'-':"




New England 1 New York-New Jersey 2 Georgia 7 Chicago Regional 30 Ohio Valley 33

49 Indiana 2 St. Louis-Ozarks 62 Greater Kansas City 64 Nebraska-W. Iowa Upper Midwest Black Hills E. South Dakota Iowa 4 Southwest Plains Centr~l Arkansas Texas

Orders Combined*

65 68 75 76 79

106 108 126

3,376 7,890

570 8,155 2,645

982 1,257

444 698

6,001 39

178 1,307

424 250 656

34,872


57.7 57.9 64.2 63.0 64.6 61.6 60.8 68.2 73.6 61.9 70.9 79.1 65.6 61.2 58.7 45.7

61.0

789 1,718

196 1,877

487 202 276 101 169

1,235 12 43

273 124 62

333

7,897

66.2 63.4 71.6 68.5 72.4 68.4 67.6 76.2 78.7 67.4 79.0 81.8 72.2 67.7 66.5 52.1

66.7

16.8 14.1 23.9 13.5 19.7 16.3 16.8 19.7 21.7 13.8 16.7 24.3 18.0 19.1 19.7 20.0

15.7

2,479 5,742

318 4,789 1,448

613 812 207 251

3,698 16 47

684 269 176

779

22,328

42.3 42.1 35.8 37.0 35.4 38.4 39.2 31.8 26.4 38.1 29.1 20.9 34.4 38.8 41.3 54.3

39.0

403 992

78 863 185 94

132 31 46

597 3

10 105 59 31

306

3,936

33.8 36.6 28.4 31.5 27.6 31.6 32.4 23.8 21.3 32.6 21.0 18.2 27.8 32.3 33.5 47.9

33.3

-12.3 -12.0 -16.6 -10.7 -15.2 ~14.4

-16.3 -15.0 -13.4 -10.7 -13.9 - 7.2 -13.7 -14.8 -16.5 -20.2

-12.9

Data for Florida producers in the following orders: Southeastern Florida (13); Tampa Bay (12); and Upper Florida (6).

5,855 13,632

888 12,944 4,093 1,595 2,069

651 949

9,699 55

225 1,991

693 426

~

1 ,192 2,710

274 2,740

672 296 408 132 215

1,832 16 53

379 183 93

639

57,200 11,834

5.0 2.9 8 . 9 4.6 7.5 4.5 3.5 9.1

12.0 4.5 8.6

17.1 7.1 5.6 4.5 3.3

4.3

2 Data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the following orders: Southern Illinois (32); St. Louis-Ozarks (62); Central Illinois (50); Paducah (99); Southwest Plains (106); and Texas (126). Excludes data for Missouri and Illinois producers in the Chicago Regional Order (30) and Greater Kansas City Order (64).

3 Data for Kentucky and Tennessee producers in the following orders: Tennessee Valley (#11); Louisvi11e-Lexington-Evansvi11e (#46); and Nashville (#98).


Documents

MARKETI NG CHANGES IN FEDERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS: … · 2011. 2. 9. · Mr. Myron R. McKinley Market Administrator 800 Roosevelt Road Building A, Suite 200 Glen Ellyn, IL 60137