17
Integrated Maritime Policy Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

  • Upload
    freya

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation. 240 replies. Are there any reasons why there should be exceptions, to the Commission’s policy of making marine data freely available and interoperable?. p rivate sector. c ivil society. endangered species valuable wrecks - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Integrated Maritime Policy

Marine Knowledge 2020:outcome of public consultation

Page 2: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

240 replies

Page 3: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Are there any reasons why there should be exceptions, to the Commission’s policy of making marine data freely available and interoperable?

• endangered species• valuable wrecks• movement of ships• publishing rights• legal responsibility• income for trading funds• "incorrect interpretation"

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 4: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Are the seven thematic groups of the European Marine Observation and Data Network the most appropriate? Should some be combined? (e.g. geology and hydrography) or should some be divided?

• need to ensure that the groups meet regularly to avoid divergence

• provide a portal giving access to data and data products from all groups was emphasised.

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 5: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

What should be the balance in EMODnet between providing access to raw data and developing digital map layers derived from the raw data across seabasins?

• need to leave room for the private sector

• raw data provides reassurance of quality

• depends on complexity

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 6: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Should a common platform be set up to deliver products from both GMES and EMODnet?

• One-stop shop• One-step at a time

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 7: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Should an internet portal similar to those for EMODnet be set up to provide access to fisheries data held by Member States,

• build on efforts by JRC or ICES

• fish are a public resource

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 8: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Should there be an obligation for research projects to include a provision ensuring the archiving and access to observations collected during the research project?

• nearly unanimous• not necessarily a legal

obligation

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 9: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Should the ‘push’ process whereby marine environment reports are delivered be progressively replaced by a ‘pull’ process?

• good long-term aim• efficiency and speed• who vouches for

accuracy?

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 10: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

How could the governance of EMODnet and GMES evolve to better accommodate the need for long term sustainability?

•Need stable funding•Not closed to new entrants•Governance board including private companies

Page 11: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Is a regular process needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the observation and sampling strategy for each sea-basin?

• Incorporate OSPAR and HELCOM,

• regional hydrographic organisations

• Contribute to adaptive management

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 12: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

What mechanism could be envisaged to manage the evaluation and assessments needed to inform the Commission, Member States and Parliament on priorities for EU support?

•External expertise and permanent committee

•Academia, Public Bodies and Commercial Organisations with clear targets and metrics

•Marine Strategy Framework Directive can help

Page 13: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Should data provided by private companies for licensing purposes be made publicly available?

• Not geophysical surveys

• Detrimental for safety?

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

Page 14: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Should licensed offshore private sector actors be obliged to contribute to wider monitoring of the sea where this is feasible?

civil society

public bodies

private sector

researchers

• the industry (..) remains positive (..) if sampling from existing structures can help realising that and if it does not interfere with the function and operation of the structures

Page 15: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

What public-private partnership models can maximise incentives for industry to share data and investments in data as well as benefits to all stakeholders?

•Already happening in UK and Netherlands•Need public support in early phases•Hydrographic organisations defensive

Page 16: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

Next Steps

• impact assessment• how to

– provide a more effective process for helping Member States fix priorities for surveying, observation and processing;

– further improve coordination between the different EU instruments concerned with marine knowledge – primarily EMODnet, Copernicus and the Data Collection Framework for fisheries;

– ensure better involvement of the private sector.• road map

Page 17: Marine Knowledge 2020: outcome of public consultation

questions