Upload
dinhtram
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Abscopal effects of radiotherapy are enhanced by combined immunostimulatory mAbs and are dependent on CD8 T cells and crosspriming.
María E. Rodriguez-Ruiz 1,2, Inmaculada Rodriguez 1, Saray Garasa 1, Benigno Barbes 1, Jose Luis Solorzano 2, Jose Luis Perez-Gracia 2, Sara Labiano 1, Miguel F.
Sanmamed1,3, Arantza Azpilikueta 1, Elixabet Bolaños 1, Alfonso R. Sanchez-Paulete 1,
M. Angela Aznar 1, Ana Rouzaut 1, Kurt A. Schalper4, Maria Jure-Kunkel5, Ignacio
Melero 1,2.
1Division of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Center for Applied Medical Research
(CIMA), University of Navarra and Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra
(IdISNA).Pamplona, Spain.
2University Clinic, University of Navarra and Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de
Navarra (IdISNA). Pamplona, Spain.
3Department of immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
4Departments of Pathology and Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of
Medicine, New Haven, CT
5Bristol-Myers Squibb. Lawrenceville, NJ.
Running title: Radioimmunotherapy and abscopal effects.
Key words: Abscopal effects, PD-1, CD137, radiotherapy
Financial support: This work was financially supported by grants from MICINN (SAF2011-22831 and SAF2014-52361-R). I. Melero was also funded by the Departamento de Salud del Gobierno de Navarra, Redes temáticas de investigación cooperativa RETICC, European Commission VII Framework and Horizon 2020 programs (AICR and PROCROP), SUDOE-IMMUNONET, Fundación de la Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), Fundación BBVA and Fundación Caja Navarra. ME Rodriguez-Ruiz receives a Rio Hortega contract from ISCIII. S. Labiano is recipient of predoctoral scholarship from MICINN.
Conflict interests: M J-K is a full time employee in Bristol Myers. IM has served as a consultant for Bristol-Myers, Roche-Genentech, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Alligator and receives research grants from Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
2
Corresponding authors: Ignacio Melero and Maria E. Rodríguez-Ruiz. [email protected] and [email protected]. CIMA and CUN. Universidad de Navarra. Av.Pio XII,55.31008.Pamplona.
Word counts
Total Abstract words: 237
Total word count 5,327
Total Figures: 7
Total References: 52
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
3
Abstract
Preclinical and clinical evidence indicate that the proimmune effects of radiotherapy can
be synergistically augmented with immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to
act both on irradiated tumor lesions and on distant, non-irradiated tumor sites. The
combination of radiotherapy with immunostimulatory anti-PD1 and anti-CD137 mAbs
was conducive to favorable effects on distant non-irradiated tumor lesions as observed
in transplanted MC38 (colorectal cancer), B16OVA (melanoma) and 4T1 (breast
cancer) models. The therapeutic activity was crucially performed by CD8 T cells, as
found in selective depletion experiments. Moreover, the integrities of BATF-3-
dependent dendritic cells specialized in crosspresentation/crosspriming of antigens to
CD8+ T cells and of the type I interferon system were absolute requirements for the
antitumor effects to occur. The irradiation regimen induced immune infiltrate changes
in the irradiated and non-irradiated lesions featured by reductions in the total content of
effector T cells, Tregs, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), while effector T
cells expressed more intracellular IFNγ in both the irradiated and contralateral tumors.
Importantly, 48h following irradiation CD8+ TILs showed brighter expression of
CD137 and PD1, thereby displaying more target molecules for the corresponding
mAbs. Likewise, PD1 and CD137 were induced on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from
surgically excised human carcinomas that were irradiated ex-vivo. These mechanisms
involving crosspriming and CD8 T cells advocate clinical development of
immunotherapy combinations with anti-PD1 plus anti-CD137 mAbs that can be
synergistically accompanied by radiotherapy strategies, even if disease is left outside
the field of irradiation.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
4
Introduction
Radiotherapy is a solid pillar of cancer treatment used to treat localized stages of
a broad variety of malignant diseases and to alleviate local complications in advanced or
metastatic cases as a palliative treatment. The mechanism of action of ionizing
radiotherapy against cancer is thought to mainly rely on catastrophic damage of
genomic DNA, leading to apoptotic tumor cell death. Many cellular genetic and
epigenetic factors affect the sensitivity of each tumor to radiotherapy approaches.
Recently, the tumor stroma component has been found to play a key role in the outcome
of irradiated tumors (1). When radiotherapy is prescribed to a patient, it is assumed that
normal non-malignant tissue will also be irradiated giving rise to multifarious biological
effects including inflammation and scarring (1). Radiotherapy can be performed by
applying an external beam of irradiation or by the temporal surgical insertion of
radiation sources guided by catheters into the cancer tissue using techniques collectively
known as brachytherapy.
Immunotherapy is emerging as another major pillar for the treatment of cancer
treatment. Monoclonal antibodies acting on immune system receptors to derepress or
agonistically augment antitumor immunity are being developed in the clinic (2).
Antibodies against the inhibitory (checkpoint) receptor CTLA-4 were the first to be
clinically developed with ipilimumab receiving FDA and EMA approval for metastatic
melanoma (3). Among these checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal immunostimulatory
antibodies, agents blocking the PD1/PD-L1 receptor/ligand pair have already attained
FDA and EMA approval for metastatic melanoma(4), NSCLC (5-7), renal cell
carcinoma (8) and other indications are under regulatory evaluation. This achievement
was preceded by extensive and successful preclinical research in mouse models.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
5
Agonist antibodies crosslinking CD137 (4-1BB) were also shown to enhance
antitumor immunity in mice to the point of causing the rejection of transplanted tumors
(9). Two antibodies against CD137 are undergoing phase II clinical trials with
promising results (10, 11). Anti-PD1 and anti-CD137 mAb act on T cells that express
these receptors on their plasma membrane presumably as a consequence of an antigen-
cognate activation process. Hence, the main mechanism of action is exerted on tumor
infiltrating lymphocytes that express such receptors on their surface, thus becoming
amenable to pharmacological modulation with the corresponding mAb. In preclinical
mouse models, anti-CD137 and anti-PD1 mAbs exert powerful synergistic effects (12),
that have given rise to two ongoing clinical trials testing such a combination
(NCT02253992, NCT02179918).
The interphase between radiotherapy and immunotherapy is an exciting
emerging topic. Radiotherapy causes biological effects known to both ignite (13, 14)
and quench the cellular immune response (13, 14). The type of cell death induced by
radiotherapy is considered immunogenic (15, 16), because it sets in motion multiple
alarmins (15, 16) and proinflammatory mechanisms (17). Radiotherapy-induced cell
death is a potential source of tumor antigens to be uptaken, processed and presented by
dendritic cells to CD8+ T lymphocytes, a processs that is collectively known as
crosspresentation (22 (18) and termed crosspriming if it results in CTL activation.
Crosspresentation to CD8+ T cells is mainly mediated by a specialized subset of
dendritic cells which are dependent for development on the Batf-3 transcription factor
(19) and on sFLT-3L as a growth factor. We have published that this DC subset is
critical for the therapeutic effects of anti-PD1 and anti-CD137 mAbs by means of
crosspresentation of tumor antigens (20). This DC subset is also known to be involved
in eliciting post-radiotherapy CTL immune responses (21). However, other mechanisms
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
6
such as irradiation-dependent TGFβ production and myeloid cell recruitment are
considered immunosuppressive.
Immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies have already been combined with
radiotherapy in preclinical models. Anti-CTLA4 mAb (22), anti-PD1 mAb (23, 24) and
anti-CD137 mAb (25-27), show evidence for synergistic effects with external beam
irradiation. Furthermore, triple combinations of radiotherapy with anti CTLA-4 plus
anti PD1 exert efficacious synergistic effects against B16F10 melanoma tumors as seen
against the directly irradiated tumor and a concomitant tumor, implanted outside the
irradiation field (28), a phenomenon known as the abscopal effect of radiotherapy (29).
Anecdotal evidence in the clinic suggests that in a patient treated with anti
CTLA-4 mAb (ipilimumab) and subsequent palliative radiotherapy there were objective
responses outside the irradiation field, concurrent with increases in the titer of
antibodies against the shared tumor antigen NY-ESO1 (30). In a phase II clinical trial
testing the ipilimumab plus radiotherapy combination there was a trend towards better
overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients (28).
In this study, we use different mouse models to demonstrate that external beam
radiotherapy synergizes with immunostimulatory anti-PD1 and anti-CD137 mAbs as
single agents and when used in combination. The therapeutic effects were attributed to
CD8 T cells by depletion experiments and involved profound changes in the tumor
microenvironment that include an augment in the expression of the receptors to be
targeted by the immunomodulatory mAb.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
7
Materials and Methods
Cell lines.
Tumor cells lines, MC38, a colon adenocarcinoma cell line of C57BL/6 origin
whose identity (Columbia, MO, USA. Case 6592-2012) was provided to us by Dr. Karl
E. Hellström (Seattle, WA). 4T1 breast carcinoma cells of BALB/c origin were a kind
gift from Dr. Sandra Demaria who sent an authenticated vial from the master cell bank
at NYU (New York City). B16F10-OVA melanoma-derived cells, that are transfected to
express chicken ovalbumin (OVA) have been verified by Idexx Radil in 2012 and kept
as a master cell bank vials thawn every 3-6 months and were cultured in RPMI 1640
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2mmol/Ll-glutamine, 0.05 mmol/L 2
mercaptoethanol, HEPES, penicillin, and streptomycin at 37º in a humidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2. All these cells lines were certified as being free of
contamination by Mycoplasma using the Mycoplasma detection kit (MycoAlert
Mycoplasma Detection Kit from Lonza).
In vivo tumor experiments
C57BL/6 female mice were injected s.c. with 5×105 MC38 and 5×105 B16OVA cells,
respectively, in the right flank (primary tumor) and with 3×105 MC38 and 3×105
B16OVA cells in the left flank (secondary tumor). A similar scheme was used to
subcutaneously engraft 4T1 cells in female BALB/c mice. Perpendicular tumor
diameters were measured with a Vernier caliper every 2-3 days, and tumor volumes
were calculated. On Day 11, when both tumors were palpable, animals were randomly
assigned to 8-groups receiving or not radiotherapy (8 Gy x 3 fractions), to only one of
the two tumors, in combination or not with intraperitoneal immunostimulatory
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
8
monoclonal antibodies (anti-PD1, anti-CD137 or both). Anti-PD1, anti-CD137, the
combination or anti-RatIgG control antibody were administered i.p. at the dose of 200
μg/mouse (10 mg/kg) or 100 μg/mouse (5mg/Kg) on days 13, 15 and 17. In some
experiments monoclonal immunostimulatory antibodies were administered on days 17,
19, 20. Tumor size was monitored every 2-3 days and mice were sacrificed when tumor
size reached 4,000 mm3. (Tumor radiotherapy procedures are detailed in supplementary
materials section).
Flow cytometry and ELISA assays
Tumor tissue was processed to obtain single cell suspension for flow cytometry
analysis (see supplementary methods). To estimate absolute numbers in cell suspension
perfect count microspheres were used as an internal standard according to manufacturer
instructions (Cytognos, Salamanca. spain).
Levels of human IFNγ in mouse plasma samples were measured by a
commercial enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Human IFNγ Elisa Set, BD
OptEIA, BD Biosciences), following the manufacturer's instructions. All samples were
measured in duplicate. The detection cutoff levels of the assay were 4.7 pg/mL for
IFNγ. The coefficient of variation was <15%. For tumor antigen-specific CD8 T-cell
assessment a H-2Kb KSPWFTTL tetramer labelled with PE (manufactured by
Biolegend) were used. For gating and costaining the following mAbs were used CD45.2
PerCP/Cy5.5 (clone 104 from Biolegend), CD4 BV421 (clone RM4-5 from Biolegend),
CD8 BV510 (clone 53-6.7 from Biolegend), CD137 biotin (clone 17B5 from
Biolegend), PD-1 FITC (clone 29F.1A12 from Biolenged).
Statistical analysis
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
9
Statistical differences between survival curves were analyzed with the Mantel-
Cox, log-rank test, non-lineal-regression and differences between other groups were
analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software
Inc., La Jolla, CA)
Results
Abscopal effects of radiotherapy are synergized by anti-CD137 and anti-PD1
immunomodulatory mAb.
Mice bearing bilateral tumors derived from subcutaneous engraftment of MC38
colorectal carcinoma cells were used as a model to monitor the abscopal effects of
radiotherapy in combination with immunostimulatory mAbs. Eight Gy fractionated
doses of external beam radiotherapy were selectively applied only to one of the tumor
lesions, while a contralateral tumor was set outside the irradiation field (see a
representative dosimetry in supple figure 1A). Contralateral concomitant tumors were
inoculated the same day with 10-fold fewer tumor cells. Radiotherapy given every other
day was followed on alternate days by three doses of anti-CD137 or/and anti-PD1
mAbs. The monoclonal antibodies were given as single agents or in combination as
detailed in supple figure 1B. Supplementary Table 1A individually shows the statistical
comparisons of the evolution of irradiated and non-irradiated tumor lesions. Results
collectively indicate that both anti-PD1 and anti-CD137 mAb contributed to control
contralateral tumor growth when in conjunction with unilateral radiotherapy. Strikingly,
the mice receiving radiotherapy and the combination of the two immunostimulatory
monoclonal antibodies were the group that achieved faster and almost constant
complete responses (supple figure 1C), translated in 100% long term overall survival
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
10
(supple figure 1D). Of note, cured mice were immune 3 months later to MC38 tumor
cell rechallenge, while able to engraft B16OVA melanoma cells as an antigenically
unrelated control (supple figure 1E).
Of note, combined treatment was well tolerated by the mice in terms of safety.
Given the fact that CD137 mAb can cause liver inflammation (31), we assessed ALT
serum levels and checked liver pathology specimens that ruled out increased toxicity
due to the addition of local radiotherapy to the immunostimulatory antibody
combination (unpublished observations).
Similar experiments were carried out with bilateral B16OVA melanoma (Figure
1A), known to be of difficult treatment by immunotherapy (32, 33). In this case, mice
bearing tumors for 11 days showed a radiotherapy-dependent control of contralateral
tumors, when distant radiotherapy was combined with either anti-PD1 or anti-CD137
mAb. When both antibodies were combined together all the tumors regressed
bilaterally, even though combined immunotherapy without irradiation also induced the
regression of most tumors (figure 1Band supple Table 1A) achieving long term survival
(figure 1C). When mice cured by the radiotherapy plus mAb combination were
rechallenged 3 months later, 3 out of 5 mice were protected from B16OVA, while
growing MC38 as a contralateral antigenically unrelated control tumor (unpublished
observations). Remarkably, measurements of the concentration of IFNγ in sera from
mice undergoing triple combined treatment (RT plus anti-PD1 plus anti-CD137)
showed on day +18 much higher levels than any other treatment regimen (figure 1D).
This fact strongly indicated an ongoing cellular immune response of far greater
intensity.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
11
4T1 breast cancer is an exceedingly difficult tumor model to treat with
immunotherapy (34) that causes spontaneous lung metastases. In this setting, we again
performed experiments with bilateral tumors, irradiating only one of the lesions (figure
2A). Tumor growth analyses indicated better local and distant tumor control when
radiotherapy was combined with immunotherapy but without achieving complete
responses (figure 2Band supple Table 1A), although this treatment did lead to longer
survival (unpublished observations). Furthermore, spontaneous metastases to the lung
were followed by CT-scans and by surgical inspection upon sacrifice with
quantification of the number and size of metastases (Figure 2C and supplementary
figure 2). As can be seen in figure 2C overall numbers of spontaneous lung metastases
were reduced in the radiotherapy plus combined mAb immunotherapy group. In supple
figure 2 individual CT-SCAN sections and representative excised lungs are shown.
In the case of bilateral MC38 tumors experiments were also performed starting
treatment as late as day +14 (figure 3A) post tumor cell engraftment to ascertain the
limits of the strategy and demonstrate radiotherapy synergy with the anti-CD137 plus
anti-PD1 combination regimen. In this case, the treatments were not curative in any
case (figure 3B and C), but the delay in tumor progression induced by the triple
combination (RT plus anti-PD1 plus anti-CD137) was readily seen in comparison when
monitoring the contralateral tumor. No noticeable effects were exerted by each of the
mAb when used separately in this regimen, or when the immunotherapy combination
was employed without radiotherapy (figure 3B and C and supple table 1 B).
CD8 T cells, BATF-3-dependent dendritic cells and the type I IFN system are
necessary for the radiotherapy abscopal effects potentiated by anti-CD137 and anti
PD1 mAbs.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
12
Using treatment conditions comparable to those in figure 1 and supplementary
figure1, on bilateral MC38-derived tumors, we repeatedly depleted CD8β+ T cells, CD4+
T cells and NK 1.1+ lymphocytes with specific monoclonal antibodies (figure 4A). As
can be seen in figure 4B and C in mice treated with the combinatorial regimen of
radiotherapy plus anti-CD137 and anti-PD1 mAbs, we observed that CD8 T cells were
absolutely required for the contralateral antitumor effects. In contrast, CD4 T cell
depletion resulted in a more pronounced therapeutic effect with all animals achieving
complete bilateral regressions and showing a striking effect on overall survival. NK1.1
depletion had little effect on the outcome of the contralateral tumors (figure 4 B and C
and supple table 1C). These results show the involvement of cytolytic T lymphocytes in
the beneficial effect of the combinatorial regimen. CD4 depletion also eliminates
regulatory T cells likely explaining the better outcome upon depletion with anti- CD4
mAb. Induction of CTLs against tumor antigens is mainly mediated by BATF-3-
depended DC (20). Accordingly, we performed similar experiments in BATF-3
deficient mice which showed no abscopal effects and had weaker local tumor control by
radiotherapy (figure 5A and B). In line with this, BATF-3-/- mice showed no increases
in serum IFNγ following combined treatment (Figure 5C)
Since both CTLs (35) and crosspriming (36) are known to be, dependent on type
I IFNs, we next studied treatment in the same experimental setting (Figure 5A) of mice
devoid or not of type I IFN receptor (IFNAR-/-). As can be observed in figure 5D, the
abscopal effects exerted by combined radioimmunotherapy were completely abrogated
in IFNAR-deficient mice. Importantly, the local effects on the directly irradiated tumors
were also decreased to same extent, suggesting an important role of the IFNα/ ß system
on the therapeutic effects exerted by radiotherapy.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
13
Radiotherapy changes the immune tumor microenvironment in non-irradiated
tumor lesions
Observations of therapeutic effects on tumor lesions outside the irradiation fields
prompted us carry out experiments to investigate changes in the immune contexture of
the tumor microenvironment due to irradiation. Our 8 Gy fractionated doses on alternate
days (scheme in supple figure 3A) was applied to mice bearing bilateral MC38-derived
tumors. Absolute numbers and density of T lymphocyte subsets were quantitated at the
end of the regimen on day +17. We observed that CD4 T cell and CD8 T cell numbers
were clearly reduced both at the tumor site receiving radiation and, importantly, at the
tumor lesion outside the irradiation field. FOXP3+ CD4+ T reg cells were also reduced
at the contralateral site and less clearly so at the irradiated site (supple figures 3 B and
C). Myeloid-delivered suppressor cells were also evaluated as CD11b (Ly6C or Ly6G)
positive cells in the tumors. Our results indicate a trend towards a decrease in G-MDSC
in the irradiated tumor, whereas in the non-irradiated sites M-MDSC were decreased to
some extent (supple figure D and E). However, our repeated experiments did not reach
statistical significance.
The results on radiotherapy-dependent reduction of tumor infiltrating T
lymphocytes were confirmed in mice bearing MC38 tumors in which abscopal effects
were noted (Supple figure 4 A to C). However in this case combined radiotherapy plus
combined immunotherapy gave rise to dramatic increases of CD4 and CD8 T cells
infiltrating the irradiated and distant tumors (supplementary figure 4C).
Moreover, analyses with a MHC tetramer that detects specific CD8 T cells
recognizing the gp70 immunodominant antigen in MC38 tumor cells showed a clear
tendency to higher numbers of such tumor-reactive CD8 T-lymphocytes in the tumor
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
14
microenvironment observed in mice undergoing combined treatment (supple figures 4
D and E).
It was also important to assess functionality in terms of the ability of tumor-
infiltrating T lymphocytes to produce IFNγ. To this end, we treated mice as in supple
figure 1 (figure 6A) and mice were sacrificed on day +16 to monitor tumor-infiltrating
T cells. In this setting, experimental groups undergoing combined treatment showed
smaller tumor lesions on both sides (figure 6B). Intratumoral CD4 and CD8-gated T
cells were assessed for the intensity of intracellular IFNγ staining with further
stimulation ex-vivo with PMA and ionomycin. As seen in figure 6C and D,
lymphocytes from mice undergoing combined radiotherapy plus immunotherapy
attained more intense IFNγ production both in lymphocytes from the irradiated and non-
irradiated lesions. Of note these differences were also observed if the lymphocytes were
not stimulated with PMA plus ION (unpublished observations).
Radiotherapy enhances the expression of CD137 and PD1 on tumor infiltrating
lymphocytes
One possible explanation of the synergy between radiotherapy and
immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies was that radiotherapy resulted in a more
intense expression of CD137 and/or PD1 on tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes. Using
multicolor immunofluorescence and flow cytometry an increase of CD137 expression
levels was observed among TILs 48 hours following a 20Gy single dose (Supple figure
5A ). Such an effect was more conspicuous on CD8+ TILs, while PD1 expression was
preserved at a similar bright level as in the case of the non-irradiated tumor. PD-L1 was
expressed on TILs with slight increases related to radiotherapy. On TILs in the
contralateral non-irradiated lesion, CD137 levels also increased on CD8 T cells but not
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
15
on CD4 T cells. Increases in PD1 were also noted but only on CD8 T cells in the
contralateral side (supple figure 5A and B). This was not observed when only a single
dose of radiotherapy was given, since following three fractionated 8 Gy doses an
increase in the expression of PD-1 and CD137 was also documented (Supple figure 5C
and D).
To study these effects on human tumor samples, we irradiated freshly surgically
explanted adenocarcinomas (two gastric carcinomas, five colon cancers and one
condrosarcoma). Fragments of the excised tumor received 20 Gy, while the other
fragments were left without irradiation (mock irradiated). Tumors fragments were
subsequently maintained in culture medium and 48 hour later, samples were formalin-
fixed and paraffin-embedded for immunohistochemical analysis. As can be seen in
supplementary figure 6A and B, there was a clear increase in the percentage of TILs
with CD137 and PD1 detectable surface expression, while the total number of T cells
remained without noticeable changes. Supplementary Figure 6B shows
microphotographs of representative immunohistochemistry fields of one of the cases.
To study these increased expression of CD137 and PD-1 at the single cell level in a
more quantitative fashion flow cytometry analyses were performed in two cases of
colon cancer as freshly surgically excised tumors. Figure 7A shows clear increases in
immunofluorescence intensity for PD-1 and CD137 on viable CD8 or CD4 T cells that
was contingent upon irradiation. In figure 7B, dot plots of these cases show that CD8
and CD4 T cells frequently co-expressed CD137 and PD-1 following irradiation.
Furthermore, multiplex tissue immunofluorescence on a surgical specimen of gastric
cancer showed augmented expression of CD137 and PD-L1 upon irradiation and
representative images are shown in figure 7C.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
16
All in all, radiotherapy-induced increases in expression of the mAb-targeted
receptors PD1 and CD137 are thus likely to account, at least in part, for the
combinatorial synergistic effect of radiotherapy and infusion of immunomodulatory
mAb targeted to such receptors.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
17
DISCUSSION
Cancer therapeutics are likely to benefit from the combination of radiotherapy
and immunotherapy strategies (13). Our study also strongly indicates that radiotherapy
can become a treatment with systemic beneficial antitumor effects (abscopal effects), in
addition to the well-known local effects of irradiation. In our hands radiotherapy
modifies the immune microenvironment of distant non-irradiated tumors, but only the
addition of immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies was able to elicit a meaningful
therapeutic effect against non-irradiated tumors and consolidate or enhance the response
against the directly irradiated malignant lesions.
To explain the abscopal effects of radiotherapy many mechanisms have been
invoked. Radiotherapy causes vascular inflammation (13) and activation of antigen-
presenting dendritic cells (37). Recently the key contribution of sensing tumor released
DNA by the cytoplasmatic pattern recognition receptor STING was found to be
crucially important. This mechanism critically causes a local release of type I IFN
involving dendritic cells (36). Irradiation is also reported to kill tumor cells showing the
hallmarks of immunogenic cell death, as defined by Kroemer´s and Zitvogel´s groups
(38). In this study we find that abscopal effects are contingent on a dendritic cell subset
specialized in antigen crosspriming to induce CTLs (20). It is tempting to speculate that
such antigen presenting cell subset is the main mediator of productive tumor antigen
presentation to CD8 T cells.
CTL responses and crosspriming are known to be dependent on type I IFN in
mice (36, 38). This cytokine system has evolved to raise the alarm upon acute viral
infection and is involved in setting in action an optimal immune response for viral
clearance. Our findings demonstrate that IFNα/ß is critically involved in the abscopal
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
18
effects of radiotherapy. DNA released form dying tumor cells is probably involved in
eliciting IFNα/ ß via STING (39) and, in turn, IFNα/ß may act both on crosspriming
dendritic cells (36) and of CD8 T cells (35) to favor, as a necessary factor, the CTL
immune response. Strategies aiming at local enhancement of IFNα/ß could render
radiotherapy-induced tumor cell death more immunogenic as recently shown for
chemotherapy (40).
However, immunogenic cell death as induced by radiotherapy only
exceptionally offers systemic control of the spread of disease. This could be due to the
relative weakness of the immunizing effects or because of concomitantly elicited
immunosupressor factors and mechanisms such as those mediated by TGFβ (41).
Strategies to enhance the antitumor immune effects of radiotherapy have been
explored in preclinical models, and results from pioneering clinical research have also
been reported (28). For instance, mouse tumor lesions were treated with the TLR7
agonist imiquimod cream (42, 43), or injected with TLR9 CpG agonist nucleotides
showing evidence for stronger immunity with the ability to partially tackle distant
disease (44, 45). In the clinic strategies based on combinations of radiotherapy with
imiquimod (42) or subcutaneous GM-CSF (46) have been reported with promising
proof-of-concept results.
Regarding the optimal combinations of radiotherapy and immunotherapy,
several parameters are to be optimized including dose, fractionation and interval
between doses. We chose three fractions of 8 Gy based on published evidence (47)
suggesting that this regimen attains better results from the immunological point of view
at least when combining radiotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 mAb (48). However, this issue
remains open to debate.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
19
Monoclonal antibodies that tamper with immune inhibitory receptors
(checkpoints) (2) or agonist antibodies to lymphocyte costimulatory receptors (49) have
taken the center stage of oncology drug development. A plethora of clinical trials are
exploring their efficacy against multiple malignant diseases, first when used as single
agents and then in combinations(50). To date, very little clinical experience exists with
combining radiotherapy with immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies. Only results
from two clinical trials combining radiotherapy and ipilimumab are available for
metastatic melanoma (28) and prostate cancer (51). These showed limited efficacy that
might be patient subset-specific. As for abscopal effects, evidence is even more scanty
although there is reported anecdotal evidence (30).
Systemic effects of anti-PD1 mAb have not yet been reported to potentiate
abscopal effects of radiotherapy in patients. In immunogenic mouse models, anti-
CD137 (25) and anti-PD1 mAb (21) have been reported to enhance the antitumor
effects of radiotherapy. In our case we report that these antibodies, and especially their
combination, can unleash a very potent therapeutic effect against the contralateral
tumors (abscopal effects), when both irradiated and non-irradiated tumor lesions were
very well established for longer than one week.
In our experiments, potentiation of abscopal effects resulted in long-term
survival, comparable to recently reported effects with the combination of anti-PD1 and
anti-CTLA-4 mAb in B16F10-bearing mice (28). In this case, the combined mechanism
resulted from a reinvigoration of antitumor CTLs that were not repressed by the
PD1/PD-L1 axis if combined treatment was given. Our selective depletion experiments
point in the same direction.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
20
Our results on abscopal effects contrast with the fact that radiotherapy by itself
reduced in our hands the content of T cells in the tumors, although it also slightly
reduced the number of MDSC both in the irradiated tumor and in the contralateral site.
However, radiotherapy enhanced IFNγ production on a per cell basis and the level of
CD137 and PD1 expression on T cells, in this way making them more amenable to
pharmacological therapeutic costimulation. This was also observed in human tumor
fragments irradiated ex-vivo. Interestingly our depletion experiments reveal that only
the function of CD8+ T cells is an absolute requirement. Moreover, at least a subset of
CD4+ cells seems to be operating in detriment of efficacy. These are likely to be Treg
cells. Importantly, at the single cell level there are tumor infiltrating lymphocytes that
coexpress the CD137 and PD-1 receptors, arguing in favour of a double hit by the
immunostimulatory mAbs on single T-cell basis.
In our hands, radiotherapy plus immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies
dramatically enhance the T-cell infiltrate following 8 days of combined treatment with
evidence for more CD8 T cells recognizing the gp70 tumor antigen in the MC38 tumor
model. These tetramer-positive cells are CD137+ and PD-1+ in keeping with previous
reports showing that CD137+ cells in human melanomas tend to be specific for tumor
neoantigens (52).
Overall, our data strongly support initiation of clinical trials testing anti-CD137
mAb in combination with PD1/PD-L1 blockade together with concomitant irradiation
of some of the tumor metastatic sites, in search of a way powerful to make the most of
these novel immunotherapies.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
21
Acknowledgments: We acknowledge generous help by Drs. Martinez-Monge,
Aristu, and Gil-Bazo from the department of oncology at CUN. We are also grateful for
the advice from Drs. Lozano, Echeveste and Idoate from the pathology department at
CUN. We are grateful for Sciencific discussion with Drs Mariano Ponz, David Sancho,
Nicola Tinari and Antonio Rullán. Excellent Dosimetry by Arantza Zubiria and
dedicated animal care by Eneko Elizalde are also acknowledged.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
22
References
1. Shalgunov V, van Wieringen JP, Janssen HM, Fransen PM, Dierckx RA, Michel MC, et al. Synthesis and evaluation in rats of homologous series of [(18)F]-labeled dopamine D 2/3 receptor agonists based on the 2-aminomethylchroman scaffold as potential PET tracers. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:119. 2. Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science. 2015;348:56-61. 3. Lipson EJ, Drake CG. Ipilimumab: an anti-CTLA-4 antibody for metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6958-62. 4. Ugurel S, Rohmel J, Ascierto PA, Flaherty KT, Grob JJ, Hauschild A, et al. Survival of patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: The impact of novel therapies. European journal of cancer. 2016;53:125-34. 5. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627-39. 6. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crino L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:123-35. 7. Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, Leighl N, Balmanoukian AS, Eder JP, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2018-28. 8. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine. 2015;373:1803-13. 9. Melero I, Shuford WW, Newby SA, Aruffo A, Ledbetter JA, Hellstrom KE, et al. Monoclonal antibodies against the 4-1BB T-cell activation molecule eradicate established tumors. Nat Med. 1997;3:682-5. 10. Fisher TS, Kamperschroer C, Oliphant T, Love VA, Lira PD, Doyonnas R, et al. Targeting of 4-1BB by monoclonal antibody PF-05082566 enhances T-cell function and promotes anti-tumor activity. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012;61:1721-33. 11. Ascierto PA, Simeone E, Sznol M, Fu YX, Melero I. Clinical experiences with anti-CD137 and anti-PD1 therapeutic antibodies. Semin Oncol. 2010;37:508-16. 12. Wei H, Zhao L, Li W, Fan K, Qian W, Hou S, et al. Combinatorial PD-1 blockade and CD137 activation has therapeutic efficacy in murine cancer models and synergizes with cisplatin. PLoS One. 2013;8:e84927. 13. Barker HE, Paget JT, Khan AA, Harrington KJ. The tumour microenvironment after radiotherapy: mechanisms of resistance and recurrence. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:409-25. 14. Demaria S, Golden EB, Formenti SC. Role of Local Radiation Therapy in Cancer Immunotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:1325-32 15. Bloy N, Pol J, Manic G, Vitale I, Eggermont A, Galon J, et al. Trial Watch: Radioimmunotherapy for oncological indications. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3:e954929. 16. Stone HB, Peters LJ, Milas L. Effect of host immune capability on radiocurability and subsequent transplantability of a murine fibrosarcoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979;63:1229-35.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
23
17. Kepp O, Senovilla L, Vitale I, Vacchelli E, Adjemian S, Agostinis P, et al. Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3:e955691. 18. Segura E, Amigorena S. Cross-Presentation in Mouse and Human Dendritic Cells. Advances in immunology. 2015;127:1-31. 19. Hildner K, Edelson BT, Purtha WE, Diamond M, Matsushita H, Kohyama M, et al. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science. 2008;322:1097-100. 20. Sanchez-Paulete AR, Cueto FJ, Martinez-Lopez M, Labiano S, Morales-Kastresana A, Rodriguez-Ruiz ME, et al. Cancer Immunotherapy with Immunomodulatory Anti-CD137 and Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibodies Requires BATF3-Dependent Dendritic Cells. Cancer discovery. 2016;6:71-9. 21. Deng L, Liang H, Burnette B, Beckett M, Darga T, Weichselbaum RR, et al. Irradiation and anti-PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:687-95. 22. Ruocco MG, Pilones KA, Kawashima N, Cammer M, Huang J, Babb JS, et al. Suppressing T cell motility induced by anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy improves antitumor effects. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3718-30. 23. Verbrugge I, Hagekyriakou J, Sharp LL, Galli M, West A, McLaughlin NM, et al. Radiotherapy increases the permissiveness of established mammary tumors to rejection by immunomodulatory antibodies. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3163-74. 24. Park SS, Dong H, Liu X, Harrington SM, Krco CJ, Grams MP, et al. PD-1 Restrains Radiotherapy-Induced Abscopal Effect. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:610-9. 25. Shi W, Siemann DW. Augmented antitumor effects of radiation therapy by 4-1BB antibody (BMS-469492) treatment. Anticancer Res. 2006;26:3445-53. 26. Belcaid Z, Phallen JA, Zeng J, See AP, Mathios D, Gottschalk C, et al. Focal radiation therapy combined with 4-1BB activation and CTLA-4 blockade yields long-term survival and a protective antigen-specific memory response in a murine glioma model. PLoS One. 2014;9:e101764. 27. Newcomb EW, Lukyanov Y, Kawashima N, Alonso-Basanta M, Wang SC, Liu M, et al. Radiotherapy enhances antitumor effect of anti-CD137 therapy in a mouse Glioma model. Radiat Res. 2010;173:426-32. 28. Twyman-Saint Victor C, Rech AJ, Maity A, Rengan R, Pauken KE, Stelekati E, et al. Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer. Nature. 2015;520:373-7. 29. Nobler MP. The abscopal effect in malignant lymphoma and its relationship to lymphocyte circulation. Radiology. 1969;93:410-2. 30. Postow MA, Callahan MK, Barker CA, Yamada Y, Yuan J, Kitano S, et al. Immunologic correlates of the abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:925-31. 31. Dubrot J, Milheiro F, Alfaro C, Palazon A, Martinez-Forero I, Perez-Gracia JL, et al. Treatment with anti-CD137 mAbs causes intense accumulations of liver T cells without selective antitumor immunotherapeutic effects in this organ. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59:1223-33. 32. Quetglas JI, Dubrot J, Bezunartea J, Sanmamed MF, Hervas-Stubbs S, Smerdou C, et al. Immunotherapeutic synergy between anti-CD137 mAb and intratumoral administration of a cytopathic Semliki Forest virus encoding IL-12. Mol Ther. 2012;20:1664-75. 33. Quetglas JI, Labiano S, Aznar MA, Bolanos E, Azpilikueta A, Rodriguez I, et al. Virotherapy with a Semliki Forest Virus-Based Vector Encoding IL12 Synergizes with PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:449-54. 34. Demaria S, Kawashima N, Yang AM, Devitt ML, Babb JS, Allison JP, et al. Immune-mediated inhibition of metastases after treatment with local radiation and CTLA-4 blockade in a mouse model of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:728-34.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
24
35. Kolumam GA, Thomas S, Thompson LJ, Sprent J, Murali-Krishna K. Type I interferons act directly on CD8 T cells to allow clonal expansion and memory formation in response to viral infection. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2005;202:637-50. 36. Le Bon A, Etchart N, Rossmann C, Ashton M, Hou S, Gewert D, et al. Cross-priming of CD8+ T cells stimulated by virus-induced type I interferon. Nature immunology. 2003;4:1009-15. 37. Gupta A, Probst HC, Vuong V, Landshammer A, Muth S, Yagita H, et al. Radiotherapy promotes tumor-specific effector CD8+ T cells via dendritic cell activation. J Immunol. 2012;189:558-66. 38. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Zitvogel L. Immunogenic cell death in cancer therapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:51-72. 39. Deng L, Liang H, Xu M, Yang X, Burnette B, Arina A, et al. STING-Dependent Cytosolic DNA Sensing Promotes Radiation-Induced Type I Interferon-Dependent Antitumor Immunity in Immunogenic Tumors. Immunity. 2014;41:843-52. 40. Sistigu A, Yamazaki T, Vacchelli E, Chaba K, Enot DP, Adam J, et al. Cancer cell-autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Nature medicine. 2014;20:1301-9. 41. Vanpouille-Box C, Diamond JM, Pilones KA, Zavadil J, Babb JS, Formenti SC, et al. TGFbeta Is a Master Regulator of Radiation Therapy-Induced Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Res. 2015;75:2232-42. 42. Adams S, Kozhaya L, Martiniuk F, Meng TC, Chiriboga L, Liebes L, et al. Topical TLR7 agonist imiquimod can induce immune-mediated rejection of skin metastases in patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6748-57. 43. Dewan MZ, Vanpouille-Box C, Kawashima N, DiNapoli S, Babb JS, Formenti SC, et al. Synergy of topical toll-like receptor 7 agonist with radiation and low-dose cyclophosphamide in a mouse model of cutaneous breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:6668-78. 44. Brody JD, Ai WZ, Czerwinski DK, Torchia JA, Levy M, Advani RH, et al. In situ vaccination with a TLR9 agonist induces systemic lymphoma regression: a phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4324-32. 45. Kim YH, Gratzinger D, Harrison C, Brody JD, Czerwinski DK, Ai WZ, et al. In situ vaccination against mycosis fungoides by intratumoral injection of a TLR9 agonist combined with radiation: a phase 1/2 study. Blood. 2012;119:355-63. 46. Golden EB, Chhabra A, Chachoua A, Adams S, Donach M, Fenton-Kerimian M, et al. Local radiotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to generate abscopal responses in patients with metastatic solid tumours: a proof-of-principle trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:795-803. 47. Dewan MZ, Galloway AE, Kawashima N, Dewyngaert JK, Babb JS, Formenti SC, et al. Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an immune-mediated abscopal effect when combined with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5379-88. 48. Ruocco MG, Pilones KA, Kawashima N, Cammer M, Huang J, Babb JS, et al. Suppressing T cell motility induced by anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy improves antitumor effects. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3718-30. 49. Melero I, Hirschhorn-Cymerman D, Morales-Kastresana A, Sanmamed MF, Wolchok JD. Agonist antibodies to TNFR molecules that costimulate T and NK cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:1044-53. 50. Melero I, Berman DM, Aznar MA, Korman AJ, Perez Gracia JL, Haanen J. Evolving synergistic combinations of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:457-72. 51. Kwon ED, Drake CG, Scher HI, Fizazi K, Bossi A, van den Eertwegh AJ, et al. Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
25
cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184-043): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:700-12. 52. Gros A, Robbins PF, Yao X, Li YF, Turcotte S, Tran E, et al. PD-1 identifies the patient-specific CD8(+) tumor-reactive repertoire infiltrating human tumors. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2246-59.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
26
Figures Legends
Figure 1: Combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy with anti-CD137
and/or anti-PD1 mAbs against B16OVA derived tumors. (A) scheme of tumor
engraftment and combined treatments. (B) Bilateral tumor size follow-up (mean) of the
indicated treatment regimes (only the primary tumors received radiotherapy when
indicated) Supple Table 1A shows statistical comparisons. (C) Overall survival in the
same groups of mice. (D) Serum concentrations of IFNγ pretreatment and 48h after
completing the regimen of the indicated mAbs with or without prior radiotherapy (RT)
dose of 8Gy x 3 fractions.
Figure 2: Combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy with anti-CD137
and/or anti-PD1 mAb mediate combined effects against 4T1-derived breast
carcinomas and reduction of spontaneous lung metastases. (A) Treatment scheme and
follow-up (B) subcutaneous tumor growth follow-up (mean) of the primary and
contralateral tumors. Only the primary tumor received radiotherapy when indicated
(Supple Table 1A shows statistical comparisons). (C) Number of lung metastasis
identified by CT-SCAN on day +36 (mean±SD) in the indicated treatment groups.
Representative data are shown in suppl figure 2 including photographs with the
spontaneous metastases seen in mice whose lungs were excised upon necropsy.
Figure 3: Delayed treatment of bilateral MC38-derived tumors shows
synergistic effects combining immunotherapy with anti-CD137 plus anti-PD1 mAbs
with radiotherapy. (A) Scheme of treatment as in supplementary figure 1 but delaying
treatment onset until day +14. As in previous figures, only the primary tumors received
radiotherapy when indicated. (B) Average bilateral tumor progression in the indicated
treatment groups. (C) Follow-up of individual bilateral subcutaneous tumors from (B).
Statistical comparisons by non-linear-regression are shown in Supple table 1B.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
27
Figure 4: CD8+ T cells are necessary for immune-mediated abscopal effects of
radiotherapy potentiated with the combination of anti-CD137 and anti-PD1 mAbs.
(A) Scheme of treatments and depletions of CD4, CD8 and NK lymphocytes with specific
antibodies.
(B) Follow-up of the growth of subcutaneous MC38-derived tumors as bilaterally
implanted (again only the primary tumors received the doses of radiotherapy when
indicated). (C) Overall survival. Statistical comparisions are shown in supple table 1C.
Figure 5: BATF-3-/- and IFNAR-/- mice lose the abscopal effects of
radiotherapy upon combination treatment with anti-PD1 and anti-CD137 mAbs. (A)
control or combined immunotherapy plus radiotherapy treatment regimens were given as
in supplementary figure 1 to C57Bl6 WT mice or to syngenic BATF3-/- or IFNAR-/-
Mice. (B) Shows the average tumor growth in the directly irradiated tumor lesion and the
contralateral tumor in BATF-3-/- mice in comparison with WT mice. (C) Concentrations
of IFNγ in the serum samples from the indicated groups of mice taken 48 hours following
the last treatment dose. (D) Similar experiment as in B comparing IFNAR-/- mice with
WT mice.
Figure 6: Combined immunostimulatory monoclonal antibodies and unilateral
radiotherapy induce more intense expression of IFNγ in CD8+ and CD4+ tumor
infiltrating T cells. (A) scheme of treatment and tumor surgical excision in mice bearing
bilateral MC38-derived tumors. (B) tumor weight at sacrifice (day +16). (C) Mean
fluorescence intensity (MFI) of intracellular IFNγ immunostaining in the gated CD8+ or
CD4+ tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes as indicated following a 4 hour re-stimulation
with PMA + ionomycin. (D) Percentage of lymphocytes expressing intracellular IFNγ
among CD8+ and CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
28
Figure 7: Ex-vivo irradiation induces CD137, PD-L1 and PD1 expression in
human carcinoma tissue samples. (A) Two primary human colon carcinomas were
surgically excised and following pathology assessment, tumor fragments were minced to 5
x 5 mm pieces and kept in tissue culture. Samples were irradiated or non-irradiated (mock-
irradiated) with a single dose of 20 Gy and 48 hours later cell suspensions were
immunostained for flow cytometry and fluorescence intensity of immunostainings for
surface CD137 and PD-1 on gated CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes are shown. (B) Dot plots
show the percentages of double positive lymphocytes for CD137 and PD-1 on CD4 and
CD8 T cells in the tumor-derived cell suspensions corresponding to irradiated and mock-
irradiated tissue samples as indicated. (C) Multiplexed immunofluorescence
microphotographs of a representative gastric carcinoma explant whose fragments were
either irradiated or mock irradiated, showing stainings for tumor cells (cytokeratin-
positive, green channel), CD3 (green chanel), CD137 or PD-L1 (red channels). Nuclei
were highlighted with DAPI (blue fluorescence). Bar= 100 um.
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549
Published OnlineFirst August 22, 2016.Cancer Res Maria E. Rodriguez-Ruiz, Inmaculada Rodriguez, Saray Garasa, et al. and crosspriming.immunostimulatory mAbs and are dependent on CD8 T cells Abscopal effects of radiotherapy are enhanced by combined
Updated version
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549doi:
Access the most recent version of this article at:
Material
Supplementary
http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2016/08/20/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549.DC1
Access the most recent supplemental material at:
Manuscript
Authoredited. Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2016/08/20/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
Research. on September 17, 2018. © 2016 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on August 22, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0549