Upload
lenga
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GNS Science
Mapping hydrothermal minerals in NZ geothermal fields using spectroscopy and application to minerals exploration
Mark P. Simpson, Greg Bignall, Andrew J. Rae, Anthony B. Christie and Isabelle Chambeford
GNS Science
Reflectance spectroscopy Many minerals can be identified by their absorption of short wave infrared (SWIR), near infrared (NIR), and visible (Vis) electromagnetic waves
SWIR-NIR-Vis waves are absorbed by molecular or crystal lattice bonds in a mineral (OH, H2O, AlOH, FeOH, MgOH & CO3)
Many minerals identified in the SWIR (1200 – 2500 nm) region
GNS Science
Mineral group Minerals Amphibole Actinolite, tremolite, hornblende
Carbonate Calcite, ankerite, siderite, rhodochrosite
Clays Chlorite, illite, interstratified illite-smectite, montmorillonite (smectite), kaolinite, dickite, halloysite
Epidote Clinozoisite, zoisite
Mica Biotite, muscovite, paragonite, phlogopite
Phyllosilicates Pyrophyllite, talc
Other Silicates Tourmaline, topaz, buddingtonite (NH4 K-feldspar)
Sulfates Alunite, jarosite, gypsum
Oxides Hematite
Minerals in geothermal fields
*Reflectance spectroscopy can detect many other minerals, but not all minerals, e.g. quartz and feldspars (adularia, albite, plagioclase)
GNS Science
Mineral group Minerals Amphibole Actinolite, tremolite, hornblende
Carbonate Calcite, ankerite, siderite, rhodochrosite
Clays Chlorite, illite, interstratified illite-smectite, montmorillonite, kaolinite, dickite, halloysite
Epidote Clinozoisite, zoisite
Mica Biotite, muscovite, paragonite, phlogopite
Phyllosilicates Pyrophyllite, talc
Other Silicates Tourmaline, topaz, buddingtonite (NH4 K-feldspar)
Sulfates (selected) Alunite, jarosite, gypsum
Oxides Hematite
Minerals in geothermal fields
*Reflectance spectroscopy can detect many other minerals, but not all minerals, e.g. quartz and feldspars (adularia, albite, plagioclase)
GNS Science
Samples and data collection No sample preparation (just dry)
Analyses can be made on: • Rocks / drill core / cuttings • Powders / pulps
Data collected by TerraSpec4 hi-res, TerraSpec Halo or older PIMA
Rapid data collection • 10 seconds per scan
Spectra viewed and processed using The Spectral Geologist (TSG®)
GNS Science
Data processing: RAW vs Hull Quotient
Examination of spectra in either RAW or following Hull quotient correction Hull quotient = background subtraction that enhances some absorption features
Raw and Hull both provide useful data
GNS Science
Limitations Spectra are a composite of all minerals present
Spectral overlap can result in mineral misidentification • e.g. interlayered illite-smectite versus discrete illite + smectite
Contamination affects mineral identification and crystallinity • fluid inclusion / intra-crystalline water • volcanic glass (H2O and FeOH)
Mineral abundance • spectral dominance of a given mineral
These effects often recognisable
GNS Science
Neutral pH minerals Minerals identifiable include: • Smectite (montmorillonite) • Interstratified illite-smectite • Illite • Calcite • Chlorite • Epidote*
Can further determine: • Crystallinity of illite • Composition of chlorite & illite
*Epidote: low abundance and spectral overlap with chlorite and / or calcite, typically precludes its identification
GNS Science
Smectite, illite-smectite, illite Spectral characterisation developed by comparison with clay XRD identifications Crystallinity ratio of H2O / AlOH
Ohaaki geothermal (Simmons and Brown, 2000)
GNS Science
Mineral RAW H2O / AlOH
Smectite <0.80 Illite-smectite 0.80 – 1.00 Illite >1.00
Mineral Hull Quotient H2O / AlOH
Smectite <0.76 Illite-smectite 0.76 – 0.96 Illite >0.96
2180
2200
2220
2240
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Wav
elen
ght o
f AlO
H fe
atur
e (n
m)
H2O / AlOH ratio
Raw Reflectance IlliteISSmectite
smectite illiteIS
2180
2200
2220
2240
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Wav
elen
ght o
f AlO
H fe
atur
e (n
m)
H2O / AlOH ratio
Hull Quotient IlliteISSmectite
smectite illiteIS
*Generally defined boundaries with some overlap
GNS Science
Some illite-smectite with high percentages of smectite or illite plot within the smectite or illite fields, respectively
Reflects limitation of detecting low amounts of smectite or illite
2180
2200
2220
2240
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
Wav
elen
ght o
f AlO
H fe
atur
e (n
m)
H2O / AlOH ratio
Hull QuotientIS 90 %IS 80 %IS 70 %IS 60 %IS 50 %IS 40 %IS 10 %
smectite IS illite
GNS Science
Favona epithermal Au-Ag deposit, NZ
Mineral RAW H2O / AlOH
Illite-smectite <1.10
Illite >1.10
*illite-smectite from XRD has between 60 to 95 % illite
XRD – Clay separate Reflectance (SWIR)
GNS Science
Favona epithermal Au-Ag deposit, NZ
Mineral RAW H2O / AlOH
Illite-smectite <1.10
Illite >1.10
*illite-smectite from XRD has between 60 to 95 % illite
XRD – Clay separate Reflectance (SWIR)
GNS Science
2 days
Simpson et al., 2005
Some differences, but overall same broad trends
~6 weeks
Waitekauri epithermal Au-Ag prospects, NZ Reflectance (SWIR)
XRD (clays)
GNS Science
Mineral composition illite composition determined from AlOH wavelength position Chlorite composition determined from FeOH wavelength position Reflects alteration and / or initial rock composition
GNS Science
Acid pH minerals Minerals identifiable include: • Kaolinite • Dickite • Alunite • Pyrophyllite • Topaz
Can further determine: • Composition alunite, K vs Na • Crystallinity kaolinite & dickite
GNS Science
Mineral distributions Accurate determination of alteration minerals distributions due to narrow sample frequency (5 m)
Appropriately select casing type and cements based on minerals distribution
Distribution of hydrothermal minerals in unspecified geothermal well, NZ. Zone of acid minerals accurately delineated
GNS Science
High sulfidation Minerals include: • Kaolinite • Dickite • Alunite • Pyrophyllite • Diaspore • Topaz
Distal • Smectite • Illite • Chlorite
(Harvey et al., 1999)
(Concepcion and Cinco, 1989; Garcia, 1991)
GNS Science
Summary • Rapid mineral identification at sample frequency impractical
by other methods (i.e. 5 m)
• Identifies many hydrothermal minerals common in mineral deposits e.g. low and high sulfidation epithermal
• Some limitations and should validate by XRD
GNS Science
Thank you
Acknowledgements Financial support for this project is from the GNS Science core-funded Geothermal Resources of New Zealand research program and also MBIE