Upload
teagan-poole
View
71
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Managing Operational Risk Within Your Treasury Environment. AGENDA. General points Impact of modern risk transfer Proven techniques to control and assess operational risk Objective approach to managing operational risk Exploiting operational VaR. Why is Operational Risk a hot topic?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Managing Operational Risk Within Your Treasury Environment
AGENDA
• General points• Impact of modern risk transfer • Proven techniques to control and assess
operational risk• Objective approach to managing operational
risk• Exploiting operational VaR
Why is Operational Risk a hot topic?
It is still the risk responsible for the most spectacular bank failures
• Barings – Index futures
• Natwest – Incorrect volatilities used to value cap portfolio
• AIB – Forex trading
What do they have in common?
• Treasury activities
• Failure is mostly due to operational risk
“Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect loss resulting
from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and
systems or from external events”
Operational Risk – What is it?
Basel Definition
Where does Operational Risk occur?
Derivatives Desk Transaction
BeforeIdentify client
need
RiskIntellectual Capital
Key People
DuringStructure
Transaction
RiskModel Risk
Disclosure
Legal
AfterDeliver Product
RiskModel Risk
Business Continuity
Reputational Fraud, Processes
People, Technology
AGENDA
• General points• Impact of modern risk transfer • Proven techniques to control and assess
operational risk• Objective approach to managing operational
risk• Exploiting operational VaR
The Trend
.
• Moving from prevention to active management
• Tools and technology exist to transfer unwanted risks to other counterparties– Interest rate derivatives– Credit derivatives– Innovative insurance products using derivatives
Implications
.
Risks are intertwined
If the primary objective is to take and manage market risk
• Incur credit risk (counterparty risk)
• Incur operational risk (model risk, fraud etc.)
Why does the use of derivatives or structured products increase the operational risk of my business?
.
• Characteristics of these OTC products are described legal documents/contracts
• Pay-off may be linked to external events– Share prices, Bond Prices– Default of a third party
• Complex mathematical models are needed to value these instruments
• Skilled people for Administration and Risk management• Appropriate IT solutions end-to-end is scarce
AGENDA
• General points• Impact of modern risk transfer techniques• Proven techniques to control and assess
operational risk• Objective approach to managing operational
risk• Exploiting operational VaR
Proven techniques for control and assess Operational Risk – Within the Company
.
• Internal audit– Ensures the quality of risk processes
– Ensures compliance with internal policies & procedures
• Compliance– Ensures compliance of risk processes with external stakeholders such
as regulators
• Straight -Through – Processing
• Adequately skilled staff
Proven techniques for control and assess Operational Risk - External
.
• Securities Exchanges– Custody systems– Electronic trading systems
• Settlement Systems
AGENDA
• General points• Impact of modern risk transfer techniques• Proven techniques to control and assess
operational risk• Objective approach to managing operational
risk• Exploiting operational VaR
Objective measures for all risks
To understand what a business’ most significant risks are, all exposures must be expressed in common terms, e.g., in Rands.
What’s my largestexposure?
Fraud
Legal Risk
Model Risk
Concept of Value-at-Risk
An estimate of the level of loss on a portfolio, which is expected to be equalled or exceeded with a given, small probability.
– Measured in monetary terms
– Specific Time horizon
– Given level of confidence (99%)
.
What is Operational VaR?
ILLUSTRATIVE
Mean
Distribution of losses for the bank
UnexpectedLosses(VaR)
ExpectedLosses
(included in costs)
Annual aggregate loss (R)
Operational Value at Risk (VaR) is the difference between the annual aggregate loss at a selected confidence level and the expected annual loss.
Measure losses from operational risk events in terms of six components, which include first and second order losses.
Regulatory
Legal Total Operational
Loss
Business Interruption
Reputation
Business
Replacement Cost
directlosses
forgoneincome
Categorisation of Operational Risk
Overview of the Statistical/Actuarial Approach
The statistical/actuarial approach is based on the theory that historical data can be used to measure the full range of potential exposures each business faces.
Frequency of events Mapping
quality of control
environment to peer group
Adjusting for insurance programs
Mapping products / service to generic
business units
Severity of loss +5
-5
100
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Insurancecontract
Operational VaR = f (Exposure, Relevance, Quality, Transfers)
Internal Loss Data
• Significant commercial benefits• Quantification of operational risk• Development of management processes.
• How do I transform the raw data to make it useable?• Convert to the bank’s currency,• Adjust for inflation
Loss Data Matrix
The loss data are placed in a matrix which is used to calculate the risk profile of each business, i.e., the inherent exposure of each business to each type of risk.
CriminalTransactionProcessing
Technology
Retail BankingNo. of lossesMeanSTD.
CommercialBanking
Trading
No. of lossesMeanSTD.
No. of lossesMeanSTD.
5423
Loss DataMatrix
ILLUSTRATIVE
2136
11 1.5
4
210.40.3
312.22.6
111.20.6
180.20.4
702.44.1
111.23.6
Severity
Severity is initially assumed to follow a Log-normal distribution (based on best-fit analysis of existing loss data). In order to calculate the severity distribution for a cell we need to know the mean and standard deviation (the parameters of the Log-normal distribution) of the losses in each cell.
ILLUSTRATIVE
Pro
bab
ilit
y
Size of Loss
Size of Loss
Pro
bab
ilit
y
Severity
In most cases internal data is incomplete. One can therefore use “anchor cells” - internal data cells that appear to have a sufficient number of small, medium and large losses and external data relationships to populate cells that do not have sufficient data.
ILLUSTRATIVE
Anchor cell
CriminalTransactionProcessing
Technology
Retail BankingNo. of lossMeanSTD.
Commercial Banking
Trading
No. of lossMeanSTD.
No. of lossMeanSTD.
111.23.6
111.20.6
0 210.40.3
10.20.4
11 1.5
4
32.22.6
0
5423
Internal Loss Data Matrix
To be populated byanchor cell(s) and
external data
Why use external loss data ?
SMALL LOSSES - MANY INTERNAL DATAPOINTS
MEDIUM LOSSES - SOME INTERNAL MEDIUM LOSSES - SOME INTERNAL DATAPOINTSDATAPOINTS
LARGE LOSSES - VERY FEW LARGE LOSSES - VERY FEW INTERNAL DATAPOINTSINTERNAL DATAPOINTS
Size of loss
Num
ber
of e
vent
s
External data is necessary here
ILLUSTRATIVE
Frequency
Frequency is assumed to follow a Poisson distribution. Mean frequency for each cell is calculated using a weighted average of internal and external data.
Internal business unit event countExternal business unit event countExternal all financial data event countExternal all data event count
Weighted (annual) average frequency
Criminal
14123422
1216
3.2
TransactionProcessing
11109312835
2.4
Technology
21214614
2327
5.2
Unauthorized Activities
23213424
1123
3.1
Sales Practices
21102211612
1.5
ILLUSTRATIVE
Retail Banking
The end result is a customized set of frequency and severity distributions for each business unit, for each risk category.
Pro
babili
ty
Retail BankingCriminalSeverity
Distribution
ILLUSTRATIVE
0 1 2 3 4 5
Size of loss (R)Number of events
Pro
babili
ty
Retail BankingCriminal
Frequency Distribution
Frequency
AGENDA
• General points• Impact of modern risk transfer techniques• Proven techniques to control and assess
operational risk• Objective approach to managing operational
risk• Exploiting operational VaR
Operational VaR – Value Proposition
• Create objective measure – Expected Losses (Cost of operational failure)– Unexpected losses (Largest exposures)
• Provide framework for cost-benefit analysis• Link controls to performance measurement
– Quantifying Operational Risk Capital– Link to shareholder value
• Rationalise Insurance Programs
Trading & SalesTrading & SalesTrading & SalesTrading & SalesInvestment Banking
Asset ManagementRetail Banking
Private Banking
82%
18%Percent of
Firm CapitalRisk
Capital
FirstSecondThirdFourth
FirstSecondThirdFourth
UnauthorizedActivities
168161153145
UnauthorizedActivities
50607590
Sales Practices
168161153145
SalesPractices
50607590
Technology
33323029
Technology
50607590
Criminal
33323029
Criminal
50607590
ManagementProcesses
33323029
ManagementProcesses
50607590
TransactionProcessing
33323029
TransactionProcessing
50607590
Disasters106101
9691
Disasters
50607590
ILLUSTRATIVE
Unit NameVaR (‘000 $)
Unit NameQuality Score
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
Disasters
Ext. Environ.
Technology
Human
Sample Operational Risk Report
VaR ComparisonVaR is primarily driven by low frequency, high severity risks. Thus, some businesses which experience high annual losses may have a relatively low VaR.
Probability
Mean A Mean B
99th percentile B
99th percentile A
Distribution of losses for Business Unit A
Distribution of losses for Business Unit B
Annual aggregate loss ($)
VaR A
VaR B
ILLUSTRATIVE
Calculate the operational risk capital needed in RAROC processes.
Risk Adjusted Returns
Operational VaR
Pro
bab
ilit
y
Low
Medium
$10m R1billion
Capital for Unexpected LossesCredit RiskMarket RiskInsurance RiskOperational Risk
RAROC =
RAROC
Tool to help a business cost justify investments or risk transfers that will reduce operational risks.
VaR savings R36M
Hurdle Rate 15%
Annual benefit R5.4M
VaR cost savings Cost of New System over 5
years R27M > R18M
ILLUSTRATIVE
Trading and Sales Department considers purchasing a new state-of-the-art computer system for transaction processing.Cost = R18.0 million
Cost Benefit Analysis
Issue
Quality Score CurrentNew
EstimateNet
Change
Unauthorized Act. 62 67 5Sales Practices 64 66 2Human Resources 36 38 2Criminal 88 88 -Management Prs. 54 55 1Trans. Processing 44 53 9Disasters 67 68 1Technology 68 74 8External 75 75 -
Total Change = +28
Capital
VaR Estimate R378 R342 -R36
Cost Benefit Analysis
Cost Benefit AnalysisVaR savings R6.0M
Hurdle Rate 15%
Annual Benefit R 0.9M
VaR cost savings Cost of Insurance R0.9M > R 0.8M
Potential Loss
Pro
bab
ilit
y
Low
Medium
1billion
Potential Loss
Pro
bab
ilit
y
Low
Medium
R50m
Without Insurance
With Insurance
Whether to purchase a rogue trader insurance policy with excess of R50 million. Cost = R0.8million
Issue
ILLUSTRATIVE
R 1billion
50m 200m
Capital
VaR Estimate R80 R74 -R6
Insurance Analysis
The Challenge
Hazard
Compliance & Prevention
Operating Performance
Strategic Initiatives
Opportunity
Uncertainty /
Variance
A B C
pwc
Managing Operational Risk Within Your Treasury Environment