29
6/11/2012 1 Managing in a Managed Care Environment Dale Jarvis, CPA [email protected] www.djconsult.net www.djconsult.net 2

Managing in a Managed Care Environment - … · Managing in a Managed Care Environment Dale Jarvis ... Quality Service Possible ... NSMHA Utilization/Financial Model Gap Analysis

  • Upload
    dinhdan

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

6/11/2012

1

Managing in a

Managed Care

Environment

Dale Jarvis, CPA

[email protected]

www.djconsult.net

www.djconsult.net

2

6/11/2012

2

Context for My Session

• There’s Mac Truck of

change coming straight

at you in 2014

• For some, the near future

is going to look like you’re

on a foreign planet

3

• One Request

• Keep Breathing

4

6/11/2012

3

Agenda – Four Chapters• The many hats of a County

Financial Manager (and the three I’m asking you to wear today).

• Looking at the numbers: the implications of coverage expansion in 2014 and beyond.

• Deciphering the writing on the wall – moving to a true managed care system.

• So, what does a highly functional, county-level, managed behavioral healthcare system look like?

5

Chapter 1: The many

hats of a County

Financial Manager

(and the three I’m

asking you to wear

today)

6

6/11/2012

4

“Mental Model” for Thinking about the New Role of the County Financial Manager

• The County MH/SU Financial Manager ought to possess five sets of skills, wearing five “hats”:

1. Chief Accounting OfficerResponsible for all aspects of the Financial Accounting System (e.g. AP, payroll, GL).

2. Chief Revenue Cycle OfficerResponsible for the patient Accounting System (e.g. Billing, AR, Collections).

3. Chief Financial PlannerCoordinating the Planning and Performance Management activities including the Annual Budgeting process and ongoing reporting and monitoring of financial and non-financial metrics.

4. Chief Risk OfficerIn charge of Government Reporting, Audits, Internal Controls, etc.

5. Chief Financial AdvisorResponsible for supporting the Board, Management Team and Service Delivery Departments.

Chief Financial Officer “Hats” and

Areas of Responsibility, View 1

Financial

Accting

System Mgmt

Client

Accting/Rev

Cycle Mgmt

Planning &

Performance

Mgmt

Risk &

Compliance

Mgmt

Executive

Management

Chief

Accounting

Officer

Chief

Revenue Cycle

Officer

Chief

Financial

Planner

Chief

Risk

Officer

Chief

Financial Advisor

6/11/2012

5

Chief Financial Officer “Hats” and

Areas of Responsibility, View 2

Chief

Accounting

Officer

Chief

Revenue

Cycle

Officer

Chief

Financial

Planner

Chief Risk

Officer

Chief

Financial

Advisor

A. Financial Accounting System Management

1 Purchasing/AP Cycle

2 Cash and Debt Management

3 Payroll Cycle

4 Fixed Assets and Inventory

5 Grant and Contract Management

6 Cost Allocation Management

7 General Ledger

8 Financial Reporting

B. Client Accounting/Revenue Cycle Management

1 Intake/Appointment Scheduling

2 Client Intake/Registration

3 Visit Data Capture

4 Payment (time of visit)

5 Third Party Billing

6 Client Billing

7 Payment Entry

8 Account Follow-up

9 Account Resolution

10 System Setup/Maintentance

11 Usual and Customary Fee Setting

Chief Financial Officer “Hats” and

Areas of Responsibility, View 2

Chief

Accounting

Officer

Chief

Revenue

Cycle

Officer

Chief

Financial

Planner

Chief Risk

Officer

Chief

Financial

Advisor

C. Planning & Performance Management1 Long Range Planning

2 Annual Planning and Budgeting

3 Performance Standard Setting

4 Reporting System Design and Development

5 Report Production

6 Ongoing Monitoring - Performance Data Analysis

7 Corrective Actions and Process Improvement

D. Risk and Compliance Management

1 Government Reporting

2 Audit Management

3 Internal Controls Management

4 Federal Compliance

5 Insurance Management

E. Executive Management

1 Board Support

2 Management Team Support

3 Service Delivery Support

4 Finance Dept staff supervision/oversight

6/11/2012

6

Chapter 2: Looking

at the numbers;

the implications of

coverage expansion

in 2014 and beyond

11

A bit of context about the numbers

• We are going to look

at data from a soon-

to-be-published CIMH

Policy Brief about the

California Health

Benefits Exchange

• Keep an eye out for an

in-depth CIMH

webinar on this topic

later in June12

Ignore the typoes typos

6/11/2012

7

Tables 1 & 2

13

Table 3

14

6/11/2012

8

15

16

6/11/2012

9

Table 4

17

18

6/11/2012

10

19

Tables 6 & 7

20

6/11/2012

11

The Punch Line…2,000,000 more in the safety net with coverage

+

300,000 – 400,000 more seeking MH/SU service

+

Up to $500,000,000 or more of additional MH/SU revenue

+

6,000 – 8,000 more clinicians needed to meet the demand

=

A description of a system on the brink of major change

21

Chapter 3: Deciphering

the writing on the wall;

moving to a true

managed care

system

22

6/11/2012

12

The Tasks Before Us…

1. Ensure that Enrollees have Access to Care

2. Ensure that the Highest Quality Service Possible is Being Provided

3. Ensure that the Right Amount of the Right Types of Services are Being Provided

4. Ensure that Services are Cost Effective

5. Managed the Financial Risk

• Build the Provider Network

• Create a High Performing Clinical Design Supported by a High Performing Network

• Develop a Care Management Capability with a Robust Level of Care System

• Develop Appropriate Payment Models

• Demand/Capacity Revenue/Expense Modeling & Risk Management Plan

23

Managed Care Company

Management Functions

Network

Development

& Management

Claims

Processing

Utilization

Management

Member

Services

Accounting &

Financial Mgmt Administration

Information

Systems

Quality

Management

BasicInfrastructure

Access &

Triage

CareManagement

Community

Affairs

24

6/11/2012

13

In Other Words…• Many California Counties are

going to have to up their

game to become full blown

Medicaid Behavioral Health

Plans (e.g. true managed

care organizations)

• With greater distinction

between the roles of:

– Medicaid Health Plan

– Service Provider

• An build a more robust

provider network and

managed care infrastructure

25

And…The Payment Models

are Going to Change• Fee for Service is going to be

replaced by models that move from paying for volume to paying for value

• This means you, as a payor, will be contracting with your network providers with:

– Modified Fee for Service

– Case Rates

– Sub-Capitation

• As soon as the regulatory structure catches up to support this 26

6/11/2012

14

Chapter 4: So, what does a

highly functional, county-level,

managed behavioral healthcare

organization look like?

27

Chapter 4 Topics

• Clinical/Financial Design Process

• Network Development Process

• Understanding Risk & Payment Models

• Risk Management Planning

• Mini-Tutorial: How to Set Case Rates

28

6/11/2012

15

Clinical/Financial Design

Clinical

Planning

Utilization

Planning

Cost

Planning

Financial

Modeling

1. What is the populationwe are serving?

2. How many people willneed service next year?

3. What kind of service willthey need?

4. How much of eachservice will they need?

5. What staff will we need toprovide the service?

6. How much will theservice cost?

7. How much revenue willbe generated?

8. What will we do if thingsstart going south?

29

1. What is the population we are serving?

Solano Flight SimulatorInput Screen: Population and Client Projections

Solano Population FY 1997 Growth Jun-1999 Mix

Child & Adolescent 97,744 1.0% 98,721 26.4%

Adults 245,847 1.0% 248,305 66.4%

Older Adults 26,909 1.0% 27,178 7.3%

370,500 374,205 100.0%

Total MediCal Eligibles FY 1997 Growth Jun-1999

Child & Adolescent 17,360 1.0% 17,534

Adults 20,789 1.0% 20,997

Older Adults 5,251 1.0% 5,304

43,400 43,834

Kaiser MediCal Eligibles FY 1997 Growth Jun-1999

Child & Adolescent 3,600 0.0% 3,600

Adults 4,311 0.0% 4,311

Older Adults 1,089 0.0% 1,089

9,000 9,000

Non-MediCal Population FY 1997 Jun-1999

Child & Adolescent 80,384 81,188

Adults 225,058 227,309

Older Adults 21,658 21,875

327,100 330,371

30

6/11/2012

16

2. How many

people will

need service

next year?

Solano Flight SimulatorInput Screen: Population and Client Projections

Child & Adolescent Cases FY 1997 CY 1997 Growth Jun-1999 Mix

MediCal 1,264 740 0.0% 1,264 80.6%

Medicare & Insurance 5 2 5.0% 5 0.3%

Indigent 285 276 5.0% 299 19.1%

1,554 1,018 0.9% 1,569 100.0%

Adult Cases FY 1997 CY 1997 Growth Jun-1999 Mix

MediCal 2,817 2,100 -25.0% 2,113 58.8%

Medicare & Insurance 292 52 0.0% 292 8.1%

Indigent 763 1,189 56.0% 1,190 33.1%

3,872 3,341 -7.2% 3,595 100.0%

Older Adult Cases FY 1997 CY 1997 Growth Jun-1999 Mix

MediCal 167 147 10.0% 184 77.3%

Medicare & Insurance 16 8 10.0% 18 7.4%

Indigent 33 41 10.0% 36 15.3%

216 196 10.0% 238 100.0%

Cases - All Ages FY 1997 CY 1997 Jun-1999 Mix

MediCal 4,248 2,987 3,560 65.9%

Medicare & Insurance 313 62 315 5.8%

Indigent 1,081 1,506 1,526 28.3%

5,642 4,555 5,401 100.0%

MediCal Penetration FY 1997 CY 1997 Jun-1999

Child & Adolescent 7.3% 4.3% 7.2%

Adults 13.6% 10.1% 10.1%

Older Adults 3.2% 2.8% 3.5%

9.8% 6.9% 8.1%

Overall Penetration FY 1997 CY 1997 Jun-1999

Child & Adolescent 1.6% 1.0% 1.6%

Adults 1.6% 1.4% 1.4%

Older Adults 0.8% 0.7% 0.9%

1.5% 1.2% 1.4%

31

How Many People…

Snoh Skagit San Juan Island Whatcom Total

1. Total PopulationChildren (0-17) 171,939 27,621 2,742 18,322 42,234 262,858

Transition Age (18-20) 25,611 4,574 338 2,807 11,351 44,681

Adults (21-59) 371,198 56,703 8,256 39,651 99,253 575,061

Older Adults (60+) 87,053 22,002 4,163 15,220 28,962 157,400

Total 655,801 110,900 15,499 76,000 181,800 1,040,000

2. Target Population (0-17: < 250%, 18+: <200% of Poverty)Children (0-17) 51,059 13,630 1,214 8,165 17,884 91,952

Transition Age (18-20) 4,229 1,197 86 643 3,591 9,746

Adults (21-59) 61,291 14,835 2,110 9,078 31,396 118,710

Older Adults (60+) 17,943 3,658 330 2,327 5,044 29,302

Total 134,522 33,320 3,740 20,213 57,915 249,710

3. Prevalence/Need & GapChildren (0-17)

Estimated Need 4,408 1,177 105 705 1,544 7,939

Clients Served 2,645 644 55 235 900 4,479

Gap (1,763) (533) (50) (470) (644) (3,460)

Adults (18+)

Estimated Need 6,094 1,438 184 880 2,923 11,519

Clients Served 4,164 881 91 363 1,695 7,194

Gap (1,930) (557) (93) (517) (1,228) (4,325)

NSMHA Utilization/Financial Model

Gap Analysis for a 5-County Region in Northwest Washington State.

32

6/11/2012

17

3. What kind of service will they need?

Solano Flight SimulatorInput Screen:

Service Modality

Unit

Hrs

per Std

Hr

Individual/Family Tx/Rehab Hr 1.0

Group Tx (2:1) Hr 2.0

Group Tx (4:1) Hr 4.0

Group Tx/Rehab Hr 6.0

Dual Dx Support Groups Hr 6.0

Psych Eval & Consultation Hr 1.0

Medication Mgmt/Prescribing Hr 1.0

Intensive Home/Comm Based Svcs Hr 1.0

Part Hosp/Daily Support Hr 3.0

Day Treatment Hr 10.0

Day Treatment/Child Hr 6.0

Rehab Clubhouse Hr 12.0

Vocational Hr 1.0

School Based Consults Hr 1.0

Care Coordination Hr 1.0

Targeted Case Management Hr 1.0

Interdisciplinary Consults Hr 0.5

Solano Flight SimulatorInput Screen: Inpatient and Residential Demand

Jun-1999

Adult Child Older Adult Total

Acute InpatientAdmissions 250 53 11 314

Projected Days 2,525 594 94 3,212

IMDsAdmissions 84 - 13 97

Projected Days 10,164 - 1,573 11,737

Crisis ResidentialAdmissions 115 24 - 139

Projected Days 2,211 336 - 2,547

Adult ResidentialAdmissions - - - -

Projected Days - - - -

Child Intensive Res.Admissions - 18 - 18

Projected Days - 1,800 - 1,800

33

4. How much of each service will clients need?

Solano Flight SimulatorInput Screen: Tx Pkgs - Direct Time Only

Adult Mental Health Services

Service Modality

Unit

Hrs

per Std

Hr

Ad

ult

Lev

el 1

a

Ad

ult

Lev

el 1

b

Ad

ult

Lev

el 2

a

Ad

ult

Lev

el 2

b

Ad

ult

Lev

el 3

a

Ad

ult

Lev

el 3

b

Ex

cep

tio

n t

o

LO

C

Ad

ult

Lev

el 4

Individual/Family Tx/Rehab Hr 1.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 25.0 40.0 - - 6.0

Group Tx (4:1) Hr 4.0 - 28.0 8.0 80.0 - - -

Group Tx/Rehab Hr 6.0 - 24.0 50.0 - - -

Dual Dx Support Groups Hr 6.0 - 24.0 20.0 10.0 80.0 - - -

Psych Eval & Consultation Hr 1.0 0.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 - - 2.0

Medication Mgmt/Prescribing Hr 1.0 0.4 4.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 - - 12.0

Part Hosp/Daily Support Hr 3.0 - - - 30.0 60.0 - - -

Vocational Hr 1.0 - 2.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 - - -

Care Coordination Hr 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 6.0 - - 6.0

Targeted Case Management Hr 1.0 - 2.0 6.0 6.0 12.0 - - 12.0

Interdisciplinary Consults Hr 0.5 - - 6.0 6.0 8.0 - - 6.0

Total Hours (Non-Standardized) 4.6 36.0 74.0 122.0 351.0 0.0 0.0 44.0

Total Hours (Standardized) 4.6 16.0 42.3 73.7 150.7 0.0 0.0 50

Median Standard Service Hours of Range 10.0 25.0 115.5 115.5 290.5 290.5 0.0 50.0

Range of Standard Service Hours - Low End 0 0 51 51 181 181 401 45

Range of Standard Service Hours - High End 20 50 180 180 400 400 9999 250

34

6/11/2012

18

How Much Service…• More and more systems are using the LOCUS to develop Level

of Care Systems.

• It is a national tool developed by the American Association of Community Psychiatrists to guide assessment, level of care placement decisions, continued stay criteria, and quality monitoring.

• It also allows system planners to understand how many low, medium and high need clients are in the system.

LOCUS Score

indicates Level of

Care

Subscale used to

finalize Level of

Care

Services planned from

those listed for the Level

of Care, based on the

expected amount of care

Services delivered based on plan of

care

LOCUS used to reassess at

annual review, or

if there is a

question about

Level of Care

Services adjusted, based on Level of Care,

including step up or step

down, discharge and

aftercare plan

Aggregate data used to assess system wide issues, gaps, under or over service,

workload, program needs, etc.

35

Locus Analysis Example

• How many people at each level?

• How much service provided – expected versus actual?

36

6/11/2012

19

Locus Score Analysis

37

How Much Service…

Multnomah County: Adult System of Care Projections

Jan-Dec 2006 - Oregon Health Plan Enrollees

Screening &

Triage Only Basic Services

Recovery Mainten-

ance

Low Intensity

Community

Based

Services

Locus Level N/A Locus 0 Locus 1 Locus 2

Locus ScoreAvailable to

all Clients< 10 10 to 13 14 to 16

Clients & Case Mix

Case Mix 7.2% 19.9% 21.4% 8.8%

Clients Served 479 1,331 1,433 590

Average Length of Stay and Treatment Slots

ALOS 1 3 6 8

Slots 40 333 717 393

Units of ServiceAvg. Units/Case 1 4 10 15

Unit of Measure Std Hr Std Hr Std Hr Std Hr

Completion Rate 70% 70% 70% 70%

Paid Units/Case 0.70 2.80 7.00 10.50

Services 335 3,727 10,031 6,195

Category IV: General Outpatient Mental Health

Services

38

6/11/2012

20

How Much Service…Multnomah County: Adult System of Care Projections

Jan-Dec 2006 - Oregon Health Plan Enrollees

Category I:

ACT

Category II:

DBT

Assertive

Community

Treatment

Dialectical

Behavioral

Therapy

Screening &

Triage Only

Low Intensity

Community

Based

Services

High Intensity

Community

Based

Services

Medically

Monitored Non-

Residential

Services

Locus Level Locus 4 Locus 4 N/A Locus 2 Locus 3 Locus 4

Locus Score20+

generally 3 to

4 on all scale

20+

generally 3 to

4 on all scale

Available to

all Clients14 to 16 17 to 19 20+

Clients & Case Mix

Case Mix 3.0% 0.4% 4.3% 5.6% 16.6% 12.8%

Clients Served 200 26 286 373 1,113 855

Average Length of Stay and Treatment Slots (the number of persons who will be served at one time)

ALOS 12 12 1 8 11 12

Slots 200 26 24 249 1,020 855

Units of Service

Avg. Units/Case 100 72 1 15 32 72

Unit of Measure Std Hr Std Hr Std Hr Std Hr Std Hr Std Hr

Completion Rate 95% 95% 70% 70% 70% 70%

Paid Units/Case 95.00 68.40 0.70 10.50 22.00 50.40

Services 19,000 1,778 200 3,917 24,486 43,092

Category III: Services for Severely Mentally Ill

39

How Much Service…

This slide projects substance abuse service need for the mid-sized California County.

Solano County Substance Abuse Fiscal and Utilization Model

Service and Cost Projections

High Scenario 9.0% penetration

Complete Partial* Total

Average Number of 40% 60% Service

Svc. Units Users Units Svc Units Svc Units

Entry Services

Detox 5 934 1,868 1,401 3,269

Extended Stabilization 5 234 467 350 817

Pre Treatment 5 584 1,168 876 2,043

Subtotal 1,751 3,503 2,627 6,130

Ongoing Services

Intensive OP/day habilitation 14 304 1,700 1,275 2,975

OP Level1 27 883 9,533 7,150 16,683

OP Level 2 131 1,027 53,840 40,380 94,219

OP Level 3 340 - - - -

Subtotal 1,910 63,373 47,530 110,902

Residential 1 28 117 1,308 981 2,288

Residental 2 178 117 8,313 6,235 14,548

Residential 3 365 - - - -

Residential 1a 90 234 8,407 6,305 14,712

Subtotal 467 18,028 13,521 31,548

Total Ongoing Clients 2,377

Average Intensive OP/day habitation days/client 9.8

Average OP hours/client 58.1

Average Residential days/client 67.6

40

6/11/2012

21

5. What

staff will

we need

to

provide

the

service?

Solano Flight SimulatorInput Screen: Adult Clinician Staffing Projections

Staffing Mix by Modality

MD

RN

Ph

D

Lic

en

sed

No

n-

Lic

en

sed

Co

nsu

mer

MH

Co

un

s

OT

/RT

/FN

P

Oth

er

Oth

er

Oth

er

To

tal

Individual/Family Tx/Rehab - 10% - 70% 10% 10% - - - - 100%

Group Tx (2:1) - 10% - 75% 15% - - - - - 100%

Group Tx (4:1) - 10% - 75% 15% - - - - - 100%

Group Tx/Rehab - - - 50% 20% 30% - - - - 100%

Dual Dx Support Groups - - - 50% 15% 35% - - - - 100%

Psych Eval & Consultation 90% - - - - - 10% - - - 100%

Medication Mgmt/Prescribing 65.0% 20% - - - - 15% - - - 100%

Intensive Home/Comm Based Svcs - 40% - 20% 30% 10% - - - - 100%

Part Hosp/Daily Support 5% 30% - 35% 15% 15% - - - - 100%

Day Treatment - - - 30% 30% 40% - - - - 100%

Vocational - - - 30% 55% - 15% - - - 100%

School Based Consults - - - 90% 10% - - - - - 100%

Care Coordination 15% 15% - 50% 10% 10% - - - - 100%

Targeted Case Management - 10% - 30% 30% 30% - - - - 100%

Interdisciplinary Consults 15% 15% 5% 50% 10% 5% - - - - 100%

Clinician Productivity

Jun-1999 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

Work Hours per Year 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800

Outpatient FTE Demand vs. Capacity Jun-1999

FTE Demand 7.41 6.34 0.30 26.07 8.35 6.89 1.72 - - - 57.07

Current County FTE Capacity 8.55 7.00 1.76 12.60 25.34 - 1.00 - - - 56.26

Shift in County FTEs (0.89) (0.44) (1.45) 0.68 (5.81) 7.13 0.78 - - 0.00

Change in County FTEs - - -

Contractor FTEs - - - 13.70 - - - - - - 13.70

Subtotal 7.66 6.56 0.31 26.98 19.53 7.13 1.78 - - - 69.96

Added "Overflow" Network FTEs - - - - - - - - - - -

Excess FTEs 0.26 0.22 0.01 0.91 11.18 0.24 0.06 - - - 12.89

41

Topic 2: Network Development ProcessStep 1: Design Process resulting in Demand Projections

Step 2: RFP soliciting Capacity for specific services

Step 3: Score RPF Responses and match Capacity with Demand (Note: If insufficient capacity, develop Plan to build capacity over time)

Step 4: Announce Agency Contracts and Caps by Service Area; if non-"winning" providers, identify as potential "overflow capacity"

Step 5: Develop Provider Manual with detailed rules; develop Utilization and Utilization Management Systems; develop client Transition Plan

Step 6: Agency Contracting including Performance Measures

Step 7: Extensive Provider Training

Step 8: Begin operating under new system

Step 9: Intensive Concurrent Review of Outpatient Level of Care assignments, checking inter-rate reliability, scoring each agency

Step 10: Provide re-training as needed to agencies not meeting standards

Steps 11: Re-evaluate inter-rate reliability

Step 12: Develop and monitor corrective action plans, as needed

Step 13: If continued problems, no new authorizations; if continued problems, cancel contract

42

6/11/2012

22

Clinical/Financial Design

Clinical

Planning

Utilization

Planning

Cost

Planning

Financial

Modeling

1. What is the populationwe are serving?

2. How many people willneed service next year?

3. What kind of service willthey need?

4. How much of eachservice will they need?

5. What staff will we need toprovide the service?

6. How much will theservice cost?

7. How much revenue willbe generated?

8. What will we do if thingsstart going south?

43

Management Flight Simulator

• We can’t compute cost in a managed care environment until we

determine the payment models we will use (next topic)

• We can’t compute risk held by the county and the network providers

until we determine the payment models we will use (next topic)

• This isn’t the Short-Doyle/Drug Medi-Cal Fee for Service environment

that we’ve been living in for the last several decades

ConsumersService Mix

Units of Service

Service StaffProductivity Hours

Available Hours

Direct Staff Costs

Other DirectOverhead

Risk Reserve

Enrollees

ConsumersService Units

Capitation/Case/FFS Rates

Demand Capacity Revenue Expense

44

6/11/2012

23

Update the Model Frequently

Model Update

Model Update afterall current

consumers have

been assessed

System in

Balance?

Initial Modeling

Demand/CapacityRevenue/Expense

based on budgets &

historical data

Yes

No

Quarterly Updates

Quarterly Updates tothe model as the

year unfolds

Next Year's Budget

Revise how moneyis programmed to

better follow

consumers

Proceed with

Caution

45

Topic 3: Understanding Risk & Payment Models

(for some, the next section is going to look like I’m on a foreign planet)

46

6/11/2012

24

47

Understanding Risk & Payment Models

• There are multiple levels of financial risk

• The other side of financial risk is reward

• The payment mechanism is the method by which risk is transferred from payer to provider

The Managed Care Risk Triangle

and Payment MechanismsManaged Care Risk/Reward Triangle

How do the risk types correlate

If I bear risk how can I lose money? to managed care funding types?

Costs per unit of service are higher 1.

than the payment rates. Cost

Risk

Individuals require more units of service Discounted

for the condition for which they are being 2. Utilization Fee for

treated than was originally estimated. Risk - Individual Service

The mix of consumers is weighted Case Rate

towards a higher severity level than 3. Utilization

was originally estimated. Risk - Case Mix

The number of individuals using

services is greater than was 4. Penetration

originally estimated. Risk

The population grows Capitation

without additional 5. Population (PMPM)*

capitation payments.** Risk **

48

6/11/2012

25

49

Payment Mechanisms

• Discounted Fee for Service: Payment for all authorized services from a defined fee schedule, minus a per visit co-payment

• Stratified Case Rate: Payment of a flat fee per patient for a predefined episode at a specific level of care, regardless of how much time and money is spent

• Blended Case Rate: Payment of a single flat fee per patient for a predefined episode regardless of how much time and money is spent

• Capitation: Payment of a fixed fee per enrollee (per member per month) to provide all medically necessary services to the covered population

Types of Risk (Example)

50

6/11/2012

26

Topic 4: Two-Part Risk Management PlanPart I: Risk Management System Design and Development

Step 1:Develop a clinical design and corresponding utilization management model that matches the enrollee population, provider network and staffing capacity.

Step 2:Project penetration, utilization, and cost by service area and modality group, updating the Utilization/Financial Model.

Step 3:Identify potential problems that could occur that would result in higher utilization/cost than projected. Develop a set of strategies to use, should these problems occur.

Step 4:Identify priority service enhancement projects, should excess funds accumulate.

Step 5:Develop a Data Tracking and Forecasting Model to monitor authorizations and claims, including an IBNR projection tool and authorization completion estimate algorithm.

51

Two-Part Risk Management PlanPart II: Risk Management System Operation

Step 6: Monitor revenue, clients, authorizations, claims, and other

expenses on a weekly and monthly basis.

Step 7: Update the Data Tracking and Forecasting Model with

information from above, projecting revenues and expenses through

year-end.

Step 8: If “reality” is unfolding as expected, continue monitoring. If

revenues or costs are trending in the wrong direction, go back to Steps

4 and/or 5.

Step 9: Potential for losses: Analyze the contributing factors, match with

the risk management strategies, and “kick in” the best strategy.

Step 10: Potential for excesses: Analyze the contributing factors and

determine if under-service is occurring in a way that requires corrective

action. If yes, work with the appropriate parties to complete a

corrective action plan. If no, consider pursuing service enhancement

projects.52

6/11/2012

27

Payment Model Decision-MakingUse the following 3 Step Process to determine how you will pay

providers in the network:

1. Determine Your Potential Payor Sources and Reimbursement Methods

– Capitation

– Case Rate

– Fee for Service

2. Determine Desired Risk Delegation to Providers

– Penetration risk (use subcapitation)

– Case mix risk (use typical case rates)

– Individual utilization risk (use stratified case rates)

– Cost Risk (use fee for service with withholds and/or grant funding)

3. Select provider reimbursement method(s)

53

Sample Reimbursement Model(Network Infrastructure)

Walk-In Center

Access CenterMobile Crisis

Unit

InpatientServices

Prevention &Early

Intervention

Programs

Psycho-educational

Services

Brief Treatment

ServicesRehab Services

ResidentialServices

Cost Risk - Grant Funded with Performance Withhold

Individual Utilization Risk - Case Rate with Risk Corridor

Cost Risk - Fee for Service with Utilization Withhold

54

6/11/2012

28

Topic 5: How to set Case Rate or Capitation Rates

55

For More Information

56

6/11/2012

29

For More Information

57

Finishing with a Familiar Slide• Many California Counties are

going to have to up their

game to become full blown

Medicaid Behavioral Health

Plans (e.g. true managed

care organizations)

• With greater distinction

between the roles of:

– Medicaid Health Plan

– Service Provider

• An build a more robust

provider network and

managed care infrastructure

58