MALAWI AID ATLAS 2010/11FY - UNDP...activities and plays a significant role in compiling aid reports and assisting with the aid coordination process. Most development partners still

Malawi Government

MALAWI AID ATLAS 2010/11FY

Ministry of Finance P.O Box 30049 Lilongwe 3, Malawi Tel. (265) 01-789-355

Page | 2

FOREWORD

I am pleased to present the fourth edition of the Malawi Annual Aid Atlas, which details the

activities of each of Malawi’s Development Partners (DPs) during 2010/2011 Fiscal Year. In the

spirit of the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS) and the Development Assistance

Strategy, the Aid Atlas presents the Government of Malawi’s ongoing commitment to improving

aid effectiveness and development effectiveness in Malawi.

The fourth edition mostly draws its inspiration from the 4th High Level Forum (HLF) on Aid

Effectiveness that was held in Busan, South Korea towards the end of 2011, which re-affirmed the

commitments made by the parties to the Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action to

promote country ownership of development. The 4th HLF also placed strengthening of country

systems at the heart of the development efforts in line with the Paris Declaration and the Accra

Agenda for Action. Donors and partner countries committed to make better use of country-led

coordination mechanisms, including division of labour, as well as programme-based approaches,

joint programming and delegated cooperation. They confirmed that transparency about aid flows

is a shared principle and a foundation for effective development cooperation. This is also in line

with the objectives of the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) which many DPs today

are signing to.

Let me take this opportunity to confirm, once again, the Government’s commitment to improve

the quality of aid information in Malawi with the realization that high quality and reliable aid

information is an important tool for effective decision making, transparency and accountability for

results. For this to be possible, however, I would like to urge all our cooperating partners to

continue to provide us with timely aid information, including aid flows outside Government

structures. As most of our cooperating partners are now using the IATI format, I am confident that

the quality and transparency of aid data will continue to improve. On its part, the Malawi

Government has agreed to be one of the five countries that the IATI secretariat will work with to

see how aid data can easily be integrated into the budget.

I, therefore, wish to express my most profound gratitude to all our cooperating partners for their

continued support to our aid management efforts through the timely provision of aid data. I wish

you a happy reading of this fourth edition of our Annual Aid Atlas.

Randson Mwadiwa Secretary to the Treasury

Page | 3

CONTENTS

FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................................... 2

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 7

LIST OF ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................... 14

KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 16

OVERVIEW OF AID DISBURSEMENTS (2010/11FY) .......................................................................... 24

Reporting Behaviour of Development Partners (2011)* ................................................................ 25

Malawi Aid Map (2010/11FY).......................................................................................................... 26

Aid Disbursement by Donor (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY) .................................................................. 27

Aid Disbursement by Development Partner (2008/09FY -2010/11FY) ........................................... 28

Aid Disbursement by Sector by Modality (2008/09FY -2010/11FY) ............................................... 29

Aid Disbursement by Modality by Development Partner (2008/09FY -2010/11FY) ....................... 31

Aid Disbursement by Sector (2008/09FY -2010/11FY).................................................................... 33

AID EFFECTIVENESS ISSUES -2008/09FY – 2010/11FY .................................................................... 34

Flow Chart of Donor Use of Country Systems (2010/11 FY) ........................................................... 35

Proportion of Aid Delivered As Sector and General Budget Support ............................................. 36

Overview of Results of the 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey* ........................................ 37

Aid Disbursement by GoM, NGOs, and Other Implementing Partners* ........................................ 38

Project Implementing Units by Donor (2010/11FY) ........................................................................ 42

Aid Disbursement by Type (2010/11FY) .......................................................................................... 42

Aid Predictability by Modality by Donor (2010/11FY)* .................................................................. 43

General Budget Support Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY) .............................. 45

Farm Input Subsidy Program Pool Support Predictability by Development Partner

(2010/11FY) ..................................................................................................................................... 45

Health SSWAp Pool Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY) ...................................... 46

Page | 4

Aid Predictability for Education SWAp Pool by Development Partner (2010/11FY) ...................... 46

Aid Fragmentation by Development Partner (2010/11FY) ............................................................. 47

Aid Fragmentation by Sector (2010/11FY) ...................................................................................... 48

Illustrative Maps of location of aid projects from the pilot Geocoding Initiative ........................... 49

SECTOR ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 53

MGDS THEME 1: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH ................................................................... 54

Agriculture (2010/11FY) .................................................................................................................. 55

Integrated Rural Development (2010/11FY) ................................................................................... 56

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources (2010/11FY) .............................................................. 57

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture (2010/11FY)..................................................................................... 58

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation (2010/11FY) ................................................................................. 59

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development (2010/11FY) ...................................................... 60

MGDS THEME 2 – SOCIAL PROTECTION AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT ............................... 61

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management (2010/11FY) ........................................................... 62

MGDS THEME 3 –SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 63

Health (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................................................... 64

Education (2010/11FY) .................................................................................................................... 66

MGDS THEME 4 – INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................... 68

Roads, Public Works and Transport (2010/11FY) ........................................................................... 69

Energy and Mining (2010/11FY) ...................................................................................................... 70

Information Technology (2010/11FY) ............................................................................................. 71

MGDS THEME 5 – IMPROVED GOVERNANCE ................................................................................. 72

Democratic Governance (2010/11FY) ............................................................................................. 73

Economic Governance (2010/11FY) ................................................................................................ 74

Public Administration 2010/11FY .................................................................................................... 75

DONOR ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 76

Page | 5

DONOR ANALYSIS –CABS DONORS ................................................................................................. 77

African Development Bank (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................... 78

European Union (2010/11FY) .......................................................................................................... 79

Norway (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................................................... 80

Department for International Development (2010/11FY) .............................................................. 81

World Bank (2010/11FY) ................................................................................................................. 82

German Development Cooperation (2010/11FY) ........................................................................... 83

DONOR ANALYSIS – DISCRETE DONORS ......................................................................................... 84

Australian Agency for International Development (2010/11FY) .................................................... 85

Canada (2010/11FY) ........................................................................................................................ 86

Centre for Disease Control (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................... 87

Flemish International Cooperation Agency (2010/11FY) ................................................................ 88

The Global Fund (2010/11FY) .......................................................................................................... 89

Iceland International Development Agency (2010/11FY) ............................................................... 90

International Fund for Agricultural Development (2010/11FY) ...................................................... 91

Ireland (2010/11FY) ......................................................................................................................... 92

Japan (2010/11FY ............................................................................................................................ 93

United States Agency for International Development (2010/11FY) ............................................... 94

DONOR ANALYSIS – UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES ........................................................................... 95

Food and Agriculture Organization (2010/11FY) ............................................................................ 96

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2010/11FY) ...................................................... 97

United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization (2010/11FY) ............................... 98

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (2010/11FY) ............................................... 99

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (2010/11FY) ........................................................ 100

United Nations Development Programme (2010/11FY) ............................................................... 101

United Nations Children’s Fund (2010/11FY) ............................................................................... 102

Page | 6

United Nations Population Fund (2010/11FY) .............................................................................. 103

World Food Programme (2010/11FY) ........................................................................................... 104

World Health Organization (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................... 105

DEVELOPMENT PARTNER ANALYSIS – EMERGING DONORS ........................................................ 106

People’s Republic of China (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................... 107

Republic of India (2010/11FY) ....................................................................................................... 108

Arab Bank for Economic Development (2010/11FY) .................................................................... 109

OPEC Fund (2010/11FY) ................................................................................................................ 110

Kuwait Fund................................................................................................................................... 111

ANNEX I: Definition and List of Project Implementing Units ............................................ 112

List of Project Implementing Units ................................................................................................ 113

Page | 7

INTRODUCTION

Aid Effectiveness Principles

The commitments made by both aid donors and aid recipients in the Paris Declaration (PD

2005) and Accra Agenda for Action (AAA 2008), highlight the importance of establishing

stronger links between donor activities and the planning and budgeting cycles of recipient

governments. For Malawi the localization of these principles is articulated within the

Government of Malawi (GoM) Development Assistance Strategy (DAS 2008). These

commitments have been recently reconfirmed at the 4th High Level Forum on Aid

Effectiveness in Busan, South Korea, which established a new Partnership for Effective

Development Cooperation.

Aid Transparency in the Busan Outcome Document

The Busan outcome document, agreed on 1st December 2011, has resulted in three

important developments for aid transparency within the aid effectiveness process:

- Donors, partner countries and civil society have agreed that transparency is a shared

principle and foundation for effective development cooperation; (§ 11d)

- Donors have made time-bound commitments to fully publish their aid information to the

common standard (IATI – International Aid Transparency Initiative); (§ 23c)

- Donors have strengthened their commitment to improving medium-term predictability by

2013. (§ 24)

At the country level the focus is on establishing transparent public financial management

and aid information management systems, and strengthen the capacities of all relevant

stakeholders to make better use of this information in decision-making and to promote

accountability.

Malawi’s Aid Management Platform

Page | 8

In an effort to enhance transparency and accountability on the use of foreign aid in 2008 the GoM

established an aid information management system known as Malawi’s Aid Management

Platform (AMP). AMP is a customized web-based tool allowing Government and donors to track

and share information related to aid-funded activities, create customized reports, and coordinate

activities.

AMP is now fully integrated in Government’s decision-making system and is the primary

tool for managing aid information in Malawi. It currently holds over 900 aid related

activities and plays a significant role in compiling aid reports and assisting with the aid

coordination process.

Most development partners still use the excel-based template developed by the Ministry

of Finance and Development Planning (MoFDP) to report their aid data. The Government

then validates and enters this data on AMP. Since 2009, the MoFDP has been working

toward establishing a fully online AMP which allows donors to log-in remotely and enter

the data directly into the system themselves. Following substantial IT upgrades and donor

training and connectivity testing, this online system is now available. Several donors are

already uploading their disbursement data directly on AMP. The Government is working on

improving internet connectivity which will increase the number of donors using the online

AMP. A recent onsite connectivity test indicated that some development partners cannot

access the online AMP due to internet connectivity problems at their offices. The

Government has invited such partners to resolve these issues to enable full access to AMP.

Box 1: Advantages of the online AMP

- The online AMP allows ministry’s staff to focus more on the analysis of donor

behavior and on verifying and supporting the quality of inputs being made by the

donors. It reduces the potential for errors in the database with the development

partners being responsible for managing their aid profiles on AMP.

- The online system will allow donors to have real-time access to data on all donor

activities across Malawi. This will help to improve sector planning and will allow

donors to generate a better understanding of each other’s activities, promoting a

Page | 9

greater level of harmonization and collaboration.

Purpose of the Aid Atlas

The primary purpose of the Annual Aid Atlas is to provide a snapshot of donor involvement

in development activities across all sectors of the Malawi economy. In support of IATI and

other aid transparency initiatives, information contained in this Aid Atlas should be used to

enhance better planning for development and support the implementation of aid

effectiveness principles such as harmonization and alignment of donor activities with

national development agenda and systems. For the public, information contained in here

provides a basis for holding the Government and development partners accountable for

development results in different sectors. The analysis that follows focuses on Official

Development Assistance (ODA) in its entirety – inclusive of both loans and grants to the

GoM. For each of the CABS donors, budget support is included under the economic

governance sector.

Data Source

The source of aid information is the development partners who provide development

assistance to Malawi. On a monthly basis the MoFDP collaborates with donors to provide

aid information which includes detailed project information such as planned and actual

disbursement figures for projects they support for the current financial year and projected

disbursements for coming fiscal years. This information is subsequently fed into the AMP.

The accuracy of the data is determined by the MoFDP’s ability to effectively manage the

AMP, and the donors’ ability to provide timely and reliable figures. The use of such figures

is based on trust since there is no real mechanism to confirm whether the disbursement

figures provided by development partners are true, unless the funds pass through the

Reserve Bank of Malawi or the receipts are confirmed by the recipients (project

implementing partners).

To facilitate the provision of aid data to MoFDP, the Government collaborated with the

development partners to establish donor focal agents (DFAs) for each donor partner active

Page | 10

in Malawi. The DFAs play a key role in submitting timely aid flow data to the MoFDP. While

there are still lags in the monthly reporting schedule, efforts made by the Government and

its development partners in capturing aid information have resulted in a marked

improvement in the quality of existing data, and the inclusion of partners previously

unaccounted for in the GoM’s official statistics.

There may be some differences in figures presented in this edition of the Aid Atlas

compared to the 2009/10FY Aid Atlas. This is due to some correction and reclassification of

entries made in AMP.

Definitions of Modalities of Aid Delivery

The GoM classifies donor activities under a number of category definitions. These

classifications are critical for tracking where and how aid funds are spent and their

inclusion into the budget process. The aid modality classifications are as follows:

1) General Budget Support: This is budgetary support that is provided to the

Government of Malawi for use without any restrictions or conditions regarding

which sector or project the money is spent on. It is deposited into the

Consolidated Account No.1 at the Reserve Bank of Malawi.

2) Farm Input Subsidy Program Support - Pooled: This is support that is

provided to the Government of Malawi to use for its agricultural inputs subsidy

program. It is deposited into the pooled Food Security Account at the Reserve

Bank of Malawi.

3) Farm Input Subsidy Program Support - Discrete: This is budgetary support

that is provided to the Government’s agricultural inputs subsidy program but

which does not use the RBM account. It typically involves donors purchasing

seeds and fertilizers as well as meeting transportation costs on behalf of GoM.

4) Health SWAP – Pooled: This includes funds which are deposited to the Pooled

Health SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi under the stipulations of

the Health Joint Financing Agreement.

Page | 11

5) Health SWAP – Discrete: This includes all funds which are disbursed in

support of the Health SWAp but which are not deposited into the Pooled Health

SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi. This may include direct project

support activities carried out on behalf of the Health SWAp Secretariat or

technical assistance provided to the Secretariat. This also includes all foreign

currency transactions taken on behalf of the Health SWAp Secretariat to procure

goods and services internationally.

6) National Aids Commission (NAC) Support: This includes all funds given in

support of the National Aids Commission and deposited into the NAC Account at

the Reserve Bank of Malawi.

7) Agriculture SWAp – Pooled*: This includes funds which are deposited to the

Pooled Agriculture SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi under the

stipulations of the Agriculture Joint Financing Agreement.

8) Agriculture SWAp –Discrete*: This includes all funds which are disbursed in

support of the Agriculture SWAp but which are not deposited into the Pooled

Agriculture SWAp account at the Reserve Bank of Malawi. This may include

direct project support activities carried out on behalf of the Agriculture SWAp

Secretariat or technical assistance provided to the Secretariat. This also includes

all foreign currency transactions taken on behalf of the Agriculture SWAp

Secretariat to procure goods and services internationally.

9) Road Sector –Pool: This includes all funds given in support of the Road Sector

and deposited into the Consolidated Account No.1 at the Reserve Bank of

Malawi. Currently, European Union is the only development partner committing

funds through this modality.

10) Direct Project Support: This is funding that has been allocated to specific

projects, such as the building of a school, or provision of technical assistance to a

Ministry. This funding can be channelled to a Government ministry, department

or agency, to Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) or managed by the donor

themselves through Project Implementation Units (PIUs).

Page | 12

* These modalities are not included in this document since they have just been

formalized recently but will be included in subsequent Aid Atlases.

Emerging Issues in this year’s Aid Atlas

This year’s Atlas builds on last year’s (2009/10FY Aid Atlas) which made a number of

improvements to previous editions including introduction of Aid Effectiveness Section,

inclusion of a full list of Project Implementing Units operating in Malawi, provision of more

detailed information on aid fragmentation, harmonization and aid modalities, as well as

data on Malawi’s emerging development partners. In addition, in this year’s Atlas we

present an overview of the results of the 2011 PD Monitoring Survey for Malawi. For the

first time the Aid Atlas includes information from the pilot geocoding initiative, which

tracks the location of all aid activities in the Malawi AMP. Government cooperated with

nearly all of its resident donor partners, gathering necessary information to geocode the

aid projects on AMP using an IATI-compliant methodology. Approximately 600 projects

have been mapped sub-nationally, which makes approximately 75% of total commitments

(US$5.6/$7.6 billion) and 71% of disbursements ($3.73/$5.25 billion) mapped. This

includes projects from 31 donors working in all 28 districts of Malawi. The mapping uses

socioeconomic indicators from the National Statistics Office to compare project locations

to local needs.

Another area that emerges as a high priority in this year’s Atlas is the Use of Country

Systems. To increase focus on development results, the Busan outcome document seeks

strong support for developing countries’ efforts to strengthen their policies and core

institutions, including through the creation of transparent and country-led results

frameworks and platforms. The document reaffirms the commitment made by parties to

the PD and Accra Agenda for Action to promote country ownership of development: using

country systems as the default approach for development cooperation and placing

strengthening of country systems at the heart of the development efforts. The GoM

recently put in place an overarching Public Finance and Economic Management Reform

Programme and several donors agreed on a joint donor Trust Fund to be managed by the

Page | 13

World Bank. These developments will continue to be monitored in the next editions of the

Aid Atlas.

It should also be pointed out that the Malawi’s AMP and the Aid Atlas which is being

produced on yearly basis have been referred to as a successful example of the benefits of

the collaboration between Government and the development partners and a good practice

from which other countries can learn. To maintain the vigilance of donor aid data

reporting, the MoFDP will continue to compile and publish information on ‘Reporting

Behaviour of Donors’ in the Aid Atlas.

Going forward, the Government would like to work more on the data entered into the

AMP to improve its quality and reliability. For instance, the Government has noted that

they is need to reclassify some sector definitions to ensure that projects are tagged to

sectors they really cover and the definitions should be well known by all DFAs. For

instance, most aid which is cross-cutting is currently classified under Economic Governance

Sector (for instance Budget Support), thereby indicating that the sector receives a lot of

support when this is not really the case. There is need to discuss on how best to capture

such information in terms of sector classifications. The same applies to Aid Modalities, not

all DFAs are well conversant with the different Modalities as such there are instances

whereby a project is tagged to a wrong modality. There is therefore need to work on this

with the DFAs.

The MoFDP welcomes feedback on this year’s edition of the Aid Atlas and wishes to

sincerely thank all the DFAs who have contributed to the production of this report. It is

hoped that the report and the data in it will serve as a catalyst for new discussions

between the Government and its donor partners on improving aid effectiveness in Malawi

and moving further towards fulfilling the country’s development goals.

Page | 14

LIST OF ACRONYMS

AAA Accra Agenda for Action

AfDB African Development Bank

AMP Aid Management Platform

CABS Common Approach to Budget Support

CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CIDA Canadian International Development Assistance

DAS Development Assistance Strategy

DFA Donor Focal Agent for AMP

DfID Department for International Development

DoL Division of Labor

DFAs Donor Focal Agents for Aid Data

DNR Data Not Reported

DP Development Partner

EU European Union

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization

FICA Flemish International Cooperation Agency

FY Fiscal/ Financial Year

GDC German Development Cooperation

GoM Government of Malawi

HLF High Level Forum

ICEIDA Iceland International Development Assistance

IFAD International Fund Agriculture Development

JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency

MGDS Malawi Growth and Development Strategy

MoFDP Ministry of Finance and Development Planning

MoU Memorandum of Understanding

NAC National AIDS Commission

NGO Non-Governmental Organization

ODA Official Development Assistance

Page | 15

PD Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PSIP Public Sector Investment Programme

SWAp Sector Wide Approach

SWG Sector Working Group

UN United Nations

UNAIDS The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

UNCT United Nations Country Team

UNDP United National Development Program

UNESCO United Nations Economic and Social Commission

UNFPA United Nations Population Fund

UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund

UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization

USAID United States Agency for International Development

WFP World Food Program

WHO World Health Organization

Page | 16

KEY FINDINGS

Overall aid disbursements remained stable in 2010/11FY. The GoM recorded

$1,022 million in donor disbursements during 2010/11FY. This constituted a 7%

increase from 2009/10FY, which recorded $955 million in donor disbursements.

Traditional donors continued to provide the majority of support. Amongst

traditional donors, USAID made the largest contribution to overall disbursements in

2010/11FY with $125 million in support. World Bank was the second largest donor

with $124 million in disbursements whilst DfID disbursed $110 million. Other major

donors included Global Fund ($109 million), EU ($97 million) and Norway ($41

million). EU and DfID have been Malawi’s largest donor partners for the past three

fiscal years, respectively contributing 11% and 14% of total ODA to Malawi in the

last three financial years (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY).

New donors continued to play an increasingly important role. The Peoples

Republic of China committed approximately $96 million of funds in 2010/11FY,

although at least half of this amount was disbursed as loans. The Republic of India

disbursed another $73 million and the Arab donors contributed $19 million. The

outcome document agreed at the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in

Busan, South Korea embraces the presence of development actors other than

traditional donors and endorses them as integral parts of a new and more inclusive

development agenda.

ODA commitments have primarily been in the form of grants. In 2010/11FY,

grants contributed 76.3 percent of total receipts while 22.9 percent were disbursed

as loans. Loans are contracted to multilaterals like the AfDB, WB, 0PEC Fund, Kuwait

Page | 17

Fund, BADEA, and IFAD. A large proportion of funding from new donors like

People’s Republic of China and Republic of India is in the form of loans. Technical

assistance accounted for 0.8% of total aid. However, the actual proportion of

technical assistance is unclear, as donors do not generally report on it separately

from grants. This raises a concern about de facto tying of some aid, with source

country consultants and companies brought into the country to do work that could

potentially be done domestically. Un-reporting also makes it difficult to establish

the extent to which technical assistance has contributed to developing local

capacities.

Aid continues to be concentrated in a small number of sectors. Health was the

largest recipient sector of overall donor support in 2010/11FY, receiving 29% of

total aid flows. Education was the second biggest recipient with 16% of total

disbursements. The 6 largest recipient sectors (Health; Education; Economic

Governance; Road, Public Works and Transport; Water and Sanitation; and

Agriculture) received 84.2% of total annual disbursements. In contrast, the 6

smallest recipient sectors (Information Technology, Public Administration; Energy

and Mining; Gender, Youth Development and Sports; Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk

Management and Integrated Rural Development) received 5.4% of total annual

disbursements.

Fragmentation within priority sectors continues to remain high and in some

cases is increasing. The Health sector received assistance from 21 donor partners

across 115 activities in 2010/11FY. Likewise Agriculture received support from 12

donors across 82 projects, Economic Governance from 11 donors across 34 projects

(including budget support), Education 12 donors across 41 projects; Water,

Sanitation and Irrigation 10 donors across 17 projects and Roads, Public Works and

Transport had 8 donors across 17 projects. These figures show that even in sectors

Page | 18

in which functioning SWAp arrangements exist, the share of discrete projects is

high. These sectors include Health which received 56% of total sector funding for

discrete projects in 2010/11FY, meaning that the share of programme support was

only 44%. Education received 72% of sector funding for discrete projects, and out of

the total funding to Agriculture 62% was for discrete projects while the share of

programme support was only 38%.

The pilot geocoding initiative improved the ability to visualize data on local aid flows. Maps

included in the current Aid Atlas are illustrative to the results. More detailed interactive maps

with exact locations are available at: http://www.strausscenter.org/ccaps/mappingtool. The

information can be filtered to individual donors, sectors, funding levels, and years (using the

"advanced filter section"). It is also possible to view basic information for a project by clicking

on one of the individual locations (once zoomed in), or by clicking on the project name in the

popup that occurs once a location is selected. The MoFDP is working to import and display

these locations in the AMP, as a next stage of AMP’s development.

Box 2: Pilot geocoding initiative - Preliminary findings

Most of the active projects appear in the Central and Southern regions of Malawi, where

population is most dense. In these regions, there appears to be broad focus of the

donors throughout all of the districts. However, several of the poorest regions in the

country are in the Northern region, where donors are funding fewer activities.

Many donors are working in the same locations throughout the country. It needs to be

analyzed whether some projects represent a duplication of efforts, or if they are

complementary in nature.

Agriculture and fishery projects are funded throughout the country. However, there

does not appear to be a particular focus on the least food secure districts, where food

represents a higher proportion of overall household spending.

http://www.strausscenter.org/ccaps/mappingtool

Page | 19

ODA commitments reported as untied have shown a general upward trend, but

some bilateral aid is still tied. Major donor countries like US made commitments at

the High Level Forum in Busan on untying their aid. The next editions of the Aid

Atlas will continue to monitor the situation at country level.

Some progress has been made in Use of Country Systems but aid disbursements

outside GoM structures remain large. This is largely attributed to the extensive use

of the traditional project approach, which remains the prevailing aid modality in

the country. Evidence shows that there is lack of use of country’s public financial

management and procurement systems for aid delivered as direct project support.

This is supported by analysis in the country report for Malawi under the 2011 PD

Monitoring Survey.

Limited progress has been made in increasing the proportion of aid delivered

as part of programme-based approaches. Budget support and sector support

reduced from 37% of total aid disbursements in 2009/10 FY to 34 % in 2010/11 FY.

General budget support decreased significantly from 24% in 2009/10FY and

accounted for only 10% of total aid disbursed in 2010/11FY while the proportion of

aid delivered as sector budget support increased from 13% to 24%. Direct project

support increased from 63% in 2009/10FY to 66% of total aid disbursements in

2010/11FY. 1 This negative trend is a concern, as experience in the past shows that

the use of programme based approaches (including SWAp) contributes to

improvements in alignment of aid to country’s development agenda.

1 The 2009/10 FY Aid Atlas reported that 45 % of total aid was delivered as budget support and sector support, which was an increase of 12

% compared to the previous financial year (2008/09FY). After some verification of data on AMP, the final figure for 2009/10 FY was set at 37 %. Direct project support for 2009/10 FY was initially reported as 55 %, but then adjusted to 63 %.

Page | 20

Key aid effectiveness targets have been missed. The 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring

Survey reported that out of 12 indicators with targets that should have been reached by

2010, Malawi met 5 (operational development strategies, alignment of aid flows to

national priorities, strengthened capacity building through co-ordinated support,

predictability of aid, and mutual accountability). Since 2005, of the remaining indicators,

four have made progress, three have been set back and three remained static.

Performance on alignment has generally been good, while progress on harmonization has

been limited, with no targets met.

Box 3: Learning from Success and Challenges

Achievement or challenge Lesson or priority action

Ownership Achievement: The link

between the Malawi Growth

and Development Strategy and

sectoral planning and

budgeting has been enhanced,

although room for

improvement remains.

Lessons: The linkage of the MDGs

to sector planning and budgeting

have been further enhanced

through the establishment of 16

sector working groups headed by

principal secretaries with donors

acting as co-chairs, although there

is a need to increase their

operationality.

Alignment Achievement: Regular forums

are held between government

and donors to ensure the

budget is implemented in a

controlled and predictable

manner.

Lessons: Development and

implementation of capacity

building strategies across sectors

at every level of government.

Harmonisation Challenge: Limited Priority action: Full operationality

Page | 21

participation of major donors

in programme-based

approaches.

of sector working groups will help

to increase donor participation in

programme-based approaches

(PBAs) and reduce aid

fragmentation. Building trust

among donors can enhance

harmonisation.

Managing for results Challenge: Data does not have

the quality and reliability to

meet M&E requirements, and

routine data collection and

analysis are not yet

institutionalised at sector

levels. As a result there are

data gaps due to lack of skills,

and funding for M&E.

Priority action: Fill capacity gaps

in sector ministries and increase

monitoring system connectivity to

improve co-ordination and

responsiveness.

Mutual accountability Achievement: Presence of

several formalised institutional

arrangements between

government, donors, private

sector and civil society for

fostering mutual

accountability.

Lessons: Development co-

operation between government,

donors and civil society leads to

the adaptation of collaborative

approaches to address

development issues.

Source: OECD/DAC 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey, Country report on Malawi

Overall predictability was high but undermined by several factors.

Performance on donors delivering on promised aid was mixed. Some donors

suspended disbursements under general budget support due to concerns relating to

Page | 22

slow progress in meeting conditions under the CABS mechanism. The World Bank

did not make any disbursements against their committed amount for general

budget support for the fiscal year mainly because the government was not on the

IMF programme. GDC and Norway disbursed respectively only 25% and 50% of their

projected disbursements. On the other hand, AfDB and DfID disbursed as promised

while EU disbursement had only 14% shortfall from the committed amount.

Farm Input Subsidy Programme Pool support performed well in terms of

predictability with an overall disbursement of 94% of what was committed. DfID

over performed by 28% and Ireland disbursed as promised. The shortfall was due to

underfunding of respectively 12% and 13% by the EU and Norway. However,

Norway revised their initial commitment of NOK 20m to NOK 23m within the fiscal

year. Disregarding the revision of the commitment, we would say that Norway

disbursed 100% of what was committed.

Education SWAp Pool received 126% of its expected funding with the extra 26%

resulting from over performance of 259% by UNICEF even though the funding was

small in absolute figures. DfID had a shortfall of 17%. Health SWAp Pool and NAC

Support received far less than what was expected. Health SWAp received 55% of

the expected disbursements. UNFPA and UNICEF did not disburse their committed

amounts while GDC and Norway disbursed only 4% and 36% of their projected

funding respectively. This underperformance is mainly attributed to audit issues

which were identified by the forensic audit for the SWAp. For NAC, lack of

disbursement by the World Bank largely contributed to the underperformance of

NAC grants, which were only 44% of projected receipts. Provision of multi-year

funding projections is still a challenge. Currently, only few DPs are able to provide

reliable data for the next three to five years.

Donor partners continued to improve their reporting behaviour in 2010/11FY.

Most resident partners provide aid data to MoFDP on monthly basis, even though

Page | 23

there are some delays. Donors that are lagging behind include USAID, World Bank,

UNESCO, UNICEF and WHO. However, the World Bank provides information through

on-line client connection and WHO and UNICEF have been working on their

database and resume reporting soon. Non-resident partners usually provide aid

data very late within the fiscal year. Several development partners have started to

upload their aid data directly on AMP. The MoFDP wishes to acknowledge the

dedication of those development partners that have honored their aid reporting

commitment throughout the 2010/11FY, and especially AfDB, FICA, EU, Japan,

Germany (KfW), Norway, CDC, WFP, UNFPA and UNDP.

Page | 24

OVERVIEW OF AID DISBURSEMENTS (2010/11FY)

Page | 25

Reporting Behaviour of Development Partners (2011)* May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11

AfDB on-time on-time on-time late on-time On-time

CDC on-time on-time on-time late On-time

CIDA late late on-time late late late On-time

DfID on-time on-time DNR DNR DNR On-time

EU on-time on-time on-time on-time on time on time On-time On-time

FICA on-time on-time late on time on time on time

German GIZ** late late late late on time late On-time

German KFW on-time on-time on-time on time on time on time

Global Fund late late on-time late late late On-time On-time

ICEIDA late late DNR late late late On-time

IFAD late late DNR late late

Irish Aid on-time on-time DNR DNR on time

Japan on-time on-time on-time late on time on time

Norway on-time on-time late late on-time on time On-time On-time

USAID DNR DNR on time

World Bank*** DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR

ONE UN

FAO late late late late on time

UNAIDS late late on-time late DNR

UNDP on-time on-time Late late late on time on time

UNESCO DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR

UNFPA on-time on-time on-time late late

UNHCR late late on time DNR DNR

UNICEF on-time on-time DNR DNR DNR

UNIDO late late on time DNR DNR

WFP on-time on-time on time late on time on time

WHO**** DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR DNR – data not reported * Due to lack of data for the other months, only data from May to December 2011 is presented in the table. Aid data for November and December 2011 continued to be received in January 2012 when this Atlas was finalized, hence changes are expected. **Disbursement reporting was disrupted by the introduction of on-line AMP absences due to leave by country GIZ officers. ***World Bank has not reported through excel templates but MoFDP is able to get aid data through the World Bank Client Connection automatic exchange. ****WHO has not been able to provide aid data since January 2011 to December 2011 because their aid data management system changed. Aid information for 2011 was provided in February 2012.

Page | 26

Malawi Aid Map (2010/11FY)

Note: Numbers represent number of active projects in each sector. Projects are deemed to be active if they made an actual disbursement during the fiscal year. For donor agencies, only those agencies and projects that are responsible for fund disbursement are listed as being active in the sector. For sectors, the Government has noted that there is need to do more work in redefining sector support when entering aid data in Aid Management Platform because some donor funds do not really fall under the sectors to which they are allocated in the System.

Page | 27

Aid Disbursement by Donor (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

USAID $74,198,462 $99,758,097 $124,503,992

World Bank $66,879,435 $139,070,065 $123,904,806

DfID $110,372,455 $96,551,021 $110,079,528

Global Fund $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178

EU $138,817,040 $154,205,498 $96,806,731

Norway $58,574,174 $57,822,913 $40,565,123

Japan $22,514,693 $29,878,468 $30,973,912

AfDB $72,405,737 $62,484,831 $29,197,764

CDC $4,172,202 $11,365,622 $24,668,969

GDC $21,554,161 $27,260,340 $22,556,557

Of which Germany (KFW) $8,938,305 $17,008,174 $11,801,173

Germany (GIZ) $12,615,856 $10,252,166 $10,755,384

Arab Donors $1,278,340 $8,736,096 $18,769,722

Ireland $9,488,284 $15,289,905 $15,316,506

FICA $3,063,731 $6,212,154 $5,773,121

IFAD $4,557,746 $8,241,959 $4,432,371

Canada $10,859,976 $7,604,906 $3,803,546

ICEIDA $5,503,954 $2,254,485 $1,815,113

AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000

ONE UN $91,354,088 $60,337,062 $88,572,013

UNFPA $34,568 $278,578 $3,254,130

UNICEF $0 $13,138,581 $34,613,753

WFP $45,282,166 $14,262,245 $22,168,270

UNDP $36,907,414 $21,825,982 $20,083,379

FAO $4,189,730 $3,938,388 $3,518,605

WHO $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299

UNHCR $854,244 $945,606 $819,072

UNAIDS $333,689 $488,773 $599,231

UNIDO $1,481,619 $463,310 $511,732

UNESCO $0 $49,873 $254,542

People's Republic of China* $0 $133,300,000 $96,151,399

Republic of India* $65,028 $5,591,312 $73,357,388

TOTAL $807,430,156 $955,393,530 $1,022,398,739

*Approximate disbursement figures for the Republic of China and the Republic of India are included in this Atlas for 2008/09FY and 2009/10FY as a point of comparison with the other donors. This is due to insufficient detail of the data from these development partners.

Page | 28

Aid Disbursement by Development Partner (2008/09FY -2010/11FY)

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

$160

$180

Million USD

2008/09FY

2009/10FY

2010/11FY

Page | 29

Aid Disbursement by Sector by Modality (2008/09FY -2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Agriculture $67,446,443 $115,853,927 $79, 729,345

Budget Support (EU Food Facility) $0 $21,590,186 $0

Direct Project Support $45,532,081 $64,000,322 $43,795,511

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $10,625,473 $7,055,228 $4,654,841

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $11,288,889 $23,208,191 $30,171,475

Democratic Governance $64,497,758 $74,168,590 $18,103,206


Economic Governance $181,823,712 $224,472,799 $126,611,618

Budget Support $164,483,596 $206,979,860 $100,408,850


Education $73,383,459 $101,905,529 $167,676,973


Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,976,983 $8,373,650

Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $46,225,241

Energy and Mining $1,744,255 $3,624,115 $4,819,394


Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $17,841,528 $19,577,513 $26,121,112


Gender, Youth Development and Sports $10,887,100 $5,345,455 $8,954,127


HEALTH $254,019,865 $191,780,695 $298,199,442


Health SWAp - Discrete $6,774,527 $3,957,356 $21,395,398

Health SWAp - Pooled $78,388,242 $48,063,421 $79,728,702

Sector Support - NAC $88,621,500 $34,921,222 $52,802,295

Information Technology $888,386 $9,633,484 $823,593

Page | 30

Direct Project Support $888,386 $9,633,484 $823,593

Integrated Rural Development $21,131,276 $16,914,477 $11,785,985


Public Administration $2,064,679 $5,512,247 $9,242,094


Roads, Public Works and Transport $44,381,338 $61,242,346 $99,245,198


Road Sector-Pooled $0 $0 $0

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $705,789 $30,699,016 $33,549,073

Direct Project Support $705,789 $30,699,016 $33,549,073

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $7,635,528 $5,872,146 $28,111,982


Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $31,484,842 $18,128,441 $19,984,024


Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $27,364,286 $70,429,975 $89,304,971


TOTAL $807,430,156 $955,393,530 $1,022,398,739

Page | 31

Aid Disbursement by Modality by Development Partner (2008/09FY -

2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Budget Support $164,483,596 $228,570,046 $100,408,850

AfDB $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183

DfID $40,468,766 $29,835,885 $29,644,156

EU $45,317,659 $110,052,752 $56,372,458

GDC (Germany -KFW) $0 $13,081,661 $3,303,306

Norway $10,879,608 $11,059,439 $5,779,344

World Bank $30,000,000 $52,527,429 $149,403


USAID $74,198,462 $99,758,097 $124,503,992

World Bank $33,190,233 $86,542,636 $103,574,803

ONE UN $91,058,522 $60,277,062 $87,585,231

Japan $22,514,693 $29,878,468 $30,973,912

CDC $4,024,497 $11,365,622 $24,668,969

EU $86,272,798 $32,127,206 $23,317,811

Norway $29,137,983 $25,342,640 $24,842,750

DfID $33,844,733 $33,129,605 $20,576,510

Arab Donors $1,278,340 $8,736,096 $18,769,722

GDC $14,247,383 $10,541,311 $11,581,002

Germany (GIZ) $12,615,865 $10,252,166 $10,755,384

Germany (KFW) $1,631,518 $289,145 $825,618

AfDB $26,582,600 $36,303,908 $11,707,208

Ireland $4,427,538 $4,037,435 $10,775,514

AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000

Canada $10,810,565 $7,604,906 $3,803,546

FICA $3,063,731 $3,463,261 $4,372,134

ICEIDA $5,503,954 $2,254,485 $1,815,113

IFAD $4,557,746 $8,241,959 $4,432,371

People's Republic of China* $0 $133,300,000 $96,151,399

Republic of India* $65,028 $5,591,312 $73,357,388

Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,976,983 $8,373,650

AfDB $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129

DfID $0 $231,439 $862,522

Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $46,225,241

DfID $0 $29,330 $18,052,963

GDC (Germany -KFW) $0 $0 $7,343,337

Page | 32

UNICEF $0 $0 $648,341

World Bank $0 $0 $20,180,600

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $10,625,473 $7,055,228 $4,654,841

DfID $298,928 $429,943 $616,478

EU $7,226,583 $144,148 $1,579,297

Ireland $3,099,962 $6,481,137 $2,459,066

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $11,288,889 $23,208,191 $30,171,475

DfID $7,217,777 $6,555,466 $9,214,319

EU $0 $11,881,391 $15,537,165

Ireland $1,960,784 $4,771,334 $2,081,926

Norway $2,110,328 $0 $3,338,066

Health SWAp - Discrete $6,774,527 $3,957,356 $21,395,398

AfDB $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244

DfID $476,409 $534,857 $492,404

Global Fund $0 $0 $16,083,750

Health SWAp - Pooled $78,388,242 $48,063,421 $79,728,701

DfID $20,706,091 $19,007,280 $24,083,548

FICA $0 $2,748,893 $1,400,987

GDC (Germany -KFW) $6,692,816 $3,521,623 $0

Global Fund $33,869,706 $3,721,540 $47,339,202

Norway $14,119,628 $19,064,085 $6,604,964

UNFPA $0 $0 $0

UNICEF $0 $0 $300,000

World Bank $3,000,000 $0 $0


EU $0 $0 $0

Sector Support - NAC $88,621,500 $34,921,222 $52,802,295

Canada $49,411 $0 $0

DfID $7,359,750 $6,797,216 $6,536,628

Global Fund $77,900,943 $25,707,257 $46,227,226

Norway $2,326,627 $2,356,749 $0

UNAIDS $295,566 $60,000 $38,441

World Bank $689,202 $0 $0

TOTAL $807,430,156 $955,393,530 $1,022,398,739

Page | 33

Aid Disbursement by Sector (2008/09FY -2010/11FY)

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

Million USD

2008/09FY

2009/10FY

2010/11FY

Aid Disbursement by Modality (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY)

Page | 34

AID EFFECTIVENESS ISSUES -2008/09FY – 2010/11FY

Page | 35

Flow Chart of Donor Use of Country Systems (2010/11 FY)

Donor Funded

Projects

Implemented via

NGOs

Extra Budgetary

Support (Off-

PSIP, Off Budget,

Off Treasury)

Funds Use

Commercial Bank

Accounts

No Use of Country Systems

Funds Use RBM Bank

Account

Funds use part 1

Development

Accounts

Funds Use

Consolidated

Accounts Funds allocated

to specific

Vote/Sector

Funds

unallocated

Sector Support

(On PSIP, On

Budget, On

Treasury)

General Budget

Support (On PSIP,

On Budget, On

Treasury)

Project Support

(On PSIP, On

Budget, On

Treasury)

Project Support

(On PSIP, On

Budget, On

Treasury)

Project Support

(On PSIP, On

Budget, On

Treasury)

Full Use of Country Systems

Partial Use of Country Systems

Implemented via

GoM Ministry

GoM

Authorizes

and processes

payments

Donor

Authorizes

and processes

payments

35% Total ODA

20% Total ODA

10% Total ODA

7% Total ODA

28% Total ODA

*Percentages indicate proportion of total aid flows ($1,021m) allocated to each aid modality during the 2010/11 FY. On-Budget indicates that Government procurement and audit systems are also being used. Further work on decomposing the ODA that uses Government Implementing Agencies but with Commercial Bank accounts between Donor and GoM disbursement authorization is currently underway.

Page | 36

Aid Disbursement Using Country Systems Aid Disbursement Using Country

Systems

Proportion of Aid Delivered As Sector and General Budget Support

Page | 37

Overview of Results of the 2011 Paris Declaration Monitoring Survey*

*Source: OECD Secretariat, final draft Malawi 2011 PD Survey Chapter

Page | 38

Aid Disbursement by GoM, NGOs, and Other Implementing Partners*

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

GoM Implementing Partners (% of total disbursements) 80% 76% 72%

Anti-Corruption Bureau $1,649,337 $1,834,831 $1,798,927

Central Contraceptives Procurement $2,785,000 $2,310,000 $4,250,003

Electoral Commission $29,670,282 $4,423,911 $478,829

Electricity Supply Corporation of Malawi $0 $0 $0

Lilongwe City Assembly $0 $18,779 $150,337

Malawi Defense Force $0 $14,628 $0

Malawi Investment Promotion Agency $403,602 $9,061 $0

Malawi Revenue Authority $0 $0 $0

Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security $39,279,457 $64,027,586 $36,488,858

Ministry of Economic Planning and Development $7,742,228 $14,822,930 $11,352,201

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology $66,836,954 $87,793,761 $125,688,967

Ministry of Energy and Mines $2,713,371 $3,950,281 $3,631,356

Ministry of Finance $192,481,593 $228,486,079 $124,385,512

Ministry of Health $131,468,709 $88,223,426 $135,781,462

Ministry of Home Affairs and Internal Security $285,509 $569,080 $502,035

Ministry of Industry and Trade $4,155,357 $10,652,402 $80,807,180

Ministry of Information and Civic Education $0 $1,514,014 $4,701,436

Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development $26,531,006 $48,011,063 $67,758,909

Ministry of Justice $2,761,727 $2,126,883 $4,273,109

Ministry of Labour $0 $0 $0

Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources $5,668,643 $3,443,753 $6,997,750

Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development

$22,351,878 $17,451,191 $11,572,488

Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $168,826 $433,651 $407,069

Ministry of Woman and Child Development $10,241,151 $4,069,035 $5,321,760

Ministry of Youth Development and Sports $125,213 $0 $73,493

Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Infrastructure

$6,463,255 $34,209,304 $86,680,492

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY $2,856,062 $1,991,097 $12,829

National Audit Office $81,459 $2,586,620 $1,116,926

National Statistics Office $1,116,247 $2,948,503 $2,269,956

Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission

$89,515,382 $36,882,222 $54,333,732

Office of the Ombudsman $86,880 $157 $0

Office of the President and Cabinet $9,404,761 $56,867,052 $6,526,181

Police $21,054 $0 $0

Poverty and Disaster Management Affairs $465,885 $379,995 $739,849

Prisons Service $21,054 $0 $0

Page | 39

Privatization Commission $0 $0 $0

Roads Authority $16,061,247 $34,164,958 $30,850,750

NGOs and other Implementing Partners (% of total disbursements) 20% 24% 28%

Academy for Education Development $210,585 $1,690,046 $4,140,730

Banja La Mtsogolo $498,205 $169,056 $1,249,713

Baobab Health Trust $0 $800,000 $2,325,000

Bunda College of Agriculture $843,916 $3,281,228 $762,168

CARE $0 $0 $0

CONGOMA $239,187 $33,317 $0

CUMO MICRO FINANCE LTD $0 $0 $66,541

Canada $1,143,785 $1,064,077 $440,204

Catholic Relief Services - USCC $7,730,049 $17,681,508 $14,890,590

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention $0 $771,089 $843,169

Centre for Legal Assistance $0 $265,384 $93,453

Centre for Multiparty Democracy $0 $15,503 $152,618

Centre for Human Rights and Rehabilitation $0 $0 $428,941

Chemonics International $2,144,436 $711,329 $13,606

Christian Health Association of Malawi (CHAM) $0 $720,000 $2,216,386

College of Medicine $0 $4,303,665 $9,312,197

Concern Ireland $0 $0 $0

Concern Universal $1,147,188 $2,465,342 $1,773,267

Concern-UK $347,932 $302,814 $401,925

Creative Associates International Inc. $0 $1,106,312 $4,386,200

Danish Church Aid $0 $0 $348,750

Department for International Development $414,048 $2,534,947 $7,033,714

Development Alternatives Incorporated $1,399,103 $599,181 $0

Directorate of Public Procurement $500,043 $824,555 $2,849,093

EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC $2,161,535 $1,746,721 $3,400,914

ELIZABETH GLASER PEDEATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION

$656,353 $721,490 $0

European Commission $63,460 $0 $0

FINANCIAL SERVICES VOLUNTEER CORPS (FSVC)

$189,999 $35,000 $100,000

Family Planning Association of Malawi (FPAM) $0 $0 $146,803

Flemish International Cooperation Agency $330,120 $0 $0

Food and Agriculture Organisation $1,181,085 $3,630,775 $2,167,759

Friends of Aids Support Trust (FAST) $0 $13,586 $106,881

German GIZ (Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit)

$0 $0 $0

Health Policy Initiative $0 $124,689 $0

Heifer Project International $0 $91,948 $313,866

Page | 40

Howard University $0 $1,100,000 $3,037,583

Human Rights Commission $498,875 $452,611 $163,924

ICRAF $1,307,203 $1,928,033 $2,597,071

INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL $101,238 $3,073,217 $705,654

International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH)

$0 $1,750,000 $2,750,000

Ireland $975,291 $904,582 $171,772

JHPIEGO CORPORATION $0 $1,279,770 $3,264,351

JOHN SNOW, INC. $8,361,910 $16,538,281 $14,101,397

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY $15,512 $3,739,733 $5,950,259

Japan International Cooperation Agency $11,182,207 $9,379,601 $11,675,017

LAND O'LAKES, INC. $1,327,861 $1,039,158 $1,288,046

Law Commission $0 $34,780 $17,640

Leadership for Environment and Development (LEAD)

$0 $1,040,763 $123,766

Lighthouse Trust $0 $97,000 $900,000

MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH $3,500,632 $7,348,530 $6,068,154

Malawi AIDS Counseling & Resource Organisation(MACRO)

$0 $1,750,000 $730,000

Malawi Blood Transfusion Service $0 $100,000 $1,140,000

MHRRC $1,053,241 $308,949 $614,565

Malawi Girl Guides Association (MAGGA) $0 $0 $130,941

Mulanje Mountain Conservation Trust $422,066 $946,201 $1,031,771

NGO Gender Coordination Network $1,334,563 $693,842 $499,089

NASFAM $315,516 $107,110 $0

Norwegian Church Aid $0 $0 $1,675,539

Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission

$89,515,382 $36,882,222 $54,333,732

Opportunity Bank of Malawi $51,842 $48,927 $27,158

OXFAM $0 $113,910 $109,333

PEACE COPRS $0 $135,884 $85,000

PMI COMMODITIES $0 $200,000 $0

POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL (PSI)

$1,008,175 $7,607,739 $10,260,331

PRIVATE AGENCIES COLLABORATING TOGETHER (PACT)

$4,609,858 $6,618,029 $5,540,775

PROJECT HOPE $630,825 $58,880 $0

Partners In Hope $0 $320,879 $1,645,667

RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE $3,079,880 $1,001,236 $2,469,723

Red Cross $188,532 $190,344 $146,395

Save the Children $384,259 $198,953 $806,313

Society of Accountants in Malawi $0 $0 $0

Swedish Cooperative Centre $1,039,224 $1,307,685 $1,485,246

Total Land Care $0 $436,699 $2,641,947

Page | 41

UNFPA $0 $0 $0

United Nations Children's Fund $6,103,718 $2,575,300 $1,529,758

United Nations Development Programme $6,216,224 $1,029,953 $700,969

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation

$0 $0 $0

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees $943,687 $20,996 $1,230,152

United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS $330,120 $75,864 $38,304

United States Agency for International Development

$6,483,863 $7,221,584 $6,500,625

WORLD LEARNING INC $295,718 $651,527 $438,566

WORLD RELIEF GRANT $24,248 $1,364,443 $2,970,000

Water Aid $105,843 $426,429 $481,259

World Bank $510,132 $526,048 $2,250,000

World Food Programme $0 $21,590,186 $0

World Health Organization $2,230,599 $4,650,919 $2,119,148

Implementing Partner Unallocated $66,886,784 $34,888,698 $119,568,865

*Note that data on aid channeled through NGOs and CSOs is not complete since a good proportion of such aid is

not reported to MoFDP as such it is not captured in AMP and aid reports, especially, aid from NGO to NGO. Going forward, the Government will intensify efforts of capturing aid information for NGO support to enhance aid transparency and accountability for results.

Page | 42

Project Implementing Units by Donor (2010/11FY)

Aid Disbursement by Type (2010/11FY)

Page | 43

Aid Predictability by Modality by Donor (2010/11FY)*

Aid Modality Donor

Currency Proj.

2010/11FY Actual

2010/11FY %

Disbursed

GENERAL BUDGET SUPPORT

AfDB UA/SDR 3,464,000 3,361,293 97%

DfID Sterling 19,000,000 19,000,000 100%

EU Euros 49,500,000 42,625,000 86%

PRBS III + V-Flex Euros 49,500,000 42,625,000 86%

Food Facility Euros 0 0

GDC Euros 10,000,000 2,500,000 25%

Norway Kroner 70,000,000 35,000,000 50%

World Bank USD 40,000,000 149,403 0%

444%

FOOD INPUT SUBSIDY PROGRAM (FISP) GRANTS - Discrete

Ireland Euro 0 1,850,000

EU Euro 0 1,109,680

DfID Pound 180,000 386,381 215%

FARM INPUT SUBSIDY PROGRAM (FISP) GRANTS - Pooled

DfID Sterling 4,600,000 5,892,582 128%

Ireland Euro 1,500,000 1,500,000 100%

EU 12,750,000 11,280,261 88% Of which Foreign Exchange

Facility Euro 8,750,000 8,750,000

100%

Of which Seed Subsidy Grants Euro 4,000,000 2,530,261 63%

Norway Kroner 23,000,000 20,000,000 87%

567%

Health SWAp GRANTS - Discrete

AfDB SDR 1,898,266 3,098,567 163%

DfID Sterling 2,900,226 307,898 11%

UNICEF USD 300,000 0 0%

Global Fund USD 0 16,083,750

HEALTH SWAp GRANTS - Pooled

DfID Sterling 15,591,000 15,080,153 97%

Global Fund USD 49,682,708 47,339,202 95%

GDC Euros 5,000,000 0 0%

Norway Kroner 110,000,000 40,000,000 36%

UNICEF USD 0 300,000

GAVI USD 0 0

FICA Euro 2,000,000 965,000 48%

Page | 44

UNFPA USD 300,000 0 0%

277%

EDUCATION SWAp GRANTS - Discrete

DfID Sterling 3,400,000 537,180 16%

GDC Euro 1,980,000 0 0%

AfDB

2,500,000 4,836,807 193%

EDUCATION SWAp GRANTS - Pooled

DfID Sterling 14,000,000 11,666,667 83%

GDC Euro 5,500,000 5,500,000 100%

UNICEF USD 250,000 648,341 259%

World Bank - NESP USD 6,000,000 5,090,600 85%

World Bank - Fast Track Initiative USD 15,000,000 15,090,000 101%

628%

NAC GRANTS

DfID Sterling 4,200,000 4,200,000 100%

Global Fund USD 61,612,610 46,227,226 75%

World Bank USD 8,225,318 0 0%

Norway Kroner 0 0

UNAIDS USD 0 38,441 175%

Project Support* USD 630,278,759 678,309,376 107%

of which Project Grants USD 384,340,312 458,381,759 119%

of which Project Loans USD 245,938,447 219,927,617 89%

*These figures comprise both on and off-budget figures. Budget support and pool funds are all on-

budget support while the discrete and project funds are mixed.

Page | 45

General Budget Support Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY)

Farm Input Subsidy Program Pool Support Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY)

Page | 46

Health SSWAp Pool Predictability by Development Partner (2010/11FY)

Aid Predictability for Education SWAp Pool by Development Partner (2010/11FY)

Page | 47

Aid Fragmentation by Development Partner (2010/11FY)

DONOR AGENCY

Total Disbursement 2010/11FY

Number of Projects

Number of Sectors

Average Project Size

Average Disbursement by Sector

USAID $124,503,992 53 9 $2,349,132 $13,833,777

World Bank $123,904,806 19 11 $6,521,306 $11,264,073

DfID $110,079,528 39 10 $2,822,552 $11,007,953

Global Fund $109,650,178 5 1 $21,930,036 $109,650,178

EU $96,806,731 32 9 $3,025,210 $10,756,303

Norway $40,565,123 34 8 $1,193,092 $5,070,640

Japan $30,973,912 16 8 $1,935,869 $3,871,739

AfDB $29,197,764 11 7 $2,654,342 $4,171,109

CDC $24,668,969 11 1 $2,242,634 $24,668,969

GDC $22,556,557 17 5 $1,326,856 $4,511,311

Arab Donors $18,769,722 5 2 $3,753,944 $9,384,861

Ireland $15,316,506 35 8 $437,614 $1,914,563

FICA $5,773,121 16 2 $360,820 $2,886,561

IFAD $4,432,371 3 2 $1,477,457 $2,216,186

Canada $3,803,546 5 4 $760,709 $950,886

ICEIDA $1,815,113 4 3 $453,778 $605,038

AusAID $1,500,000 1 1 $1,500,000 $1,500,000

ONE UN $88,572,013 135 16 $656,089 $5,535,751

UNFPA $3,254,130 23 3 $141,484 $1,084,710

UNICEF $34,613,753 12 6 $2,884,479 $5,768,959

WFP $22,168,270 3 2 $7,389,423 $11,084,135

UNDP $20,083,379 35 11 $573,811 $1,825,762

FAO $3,518,605 25 3 $140,744 $1,172,868

WHO $2,749,299 9 1 $305,478 $2,749,299

UNHCR $819,072 5 2 $163,814 $409,536

UNAIDS $599,231 13 2 $46,095 $299,616

UNIDO $511,732 3 2 $170,577 $255,866

UNESCO $254,542 7 2 $36,363 $127,271

People's Republic of China*

$96,151,399 3 3 $32,050,466 $32,050,466

Republic of India* $73,357,388 3 3 $24,452,463 $24,452,463

TOTAL $1,022,398,739 442 16 $2,313,119 $63,899,921

Page | 48

Aid Fragmentation by Sector (2010/11FY)

Total Disbursement 2010/11FY

Number of Projects

Number of Donors

Average Disbursement per Project

Average Disbursement per Donor

Agriculture $79,729,345 82 12 $972,309 $6,644,112

Democratic Governance $18,103,206 41 10 $441,542 $1,810,321

Economic Governance $126,611,618 34 11 $3,723,871 $11,510,147

Education $167,676,973 41 12 $4,089,682 $13,973,081

Energy and Mining $4,819,394 6 4 $803,232 $1,204,849

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $26,121,112 13 6 $2,009,316 $4,353,519

Gender, Youth Development and Sports $8,954,127 24 8 $373,089 $1,119,266

Health $298,199,442 115 21 $2,593,039 $14,199,973

Information Technology $823,593 1 1 $823,593 $823,593

Integrated Rural Development $11,785,985 13 9 $906,614 $1,309,554

Public Administration $9,242,094 2 2 $4,621,047 $4,621,047

Roads, Public Works and Transport $99,245,198 17 8 $5,837,953 $12,405,650

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $33,549,073 8 3 $4,193,634 $11,183,024

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $28,111,982 11 7 $2,555,635 $4,015,997

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $19,984,024 22 7 $908,365 $2,854,861

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $89,304,971 17 10 $5,253,234 $8,930,497

TOTAL $1,022,398,739 446 29 $2,292,374 $35,255,129

Page | 49

Illustrative Maps of location of aid projects from the pilot Geocoding

Initiative

Page | 50

Page | 51

Page | 52

Note: More detailed maps with exact locations of aid projects are available at:



Page | 53

SECTOR ANALYSIS

Page | 54

MGDS THEME 1: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH

Agriculture

Integrated Rural Development

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development

Page | 55

Agriculture (2010/11FY)

Agriculture Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Agriculture $67,446,443 $115,853,927 $79,729,345

AfDB $9,249,347 $28,063,311 $2,918,909

DfID $7,516,705 $6,985,409 $9,830,797

Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $298,928 $429,943 $616,478

Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $7,217,777 $6,555,466 $9,214,319

EU $13,962,277 $37,077,045 $18,557,585

Of which Budget Support (food facility) $0 $21,590,186 $0

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $7,226,583 $144,148 $1,579,297

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $0 $11,881,391 $15,537,165

FICA $2,733,611 $2,748,535 $4,372,134

FAO $4,146,157 $3,743,823 $3,177,835

ICEIDA $464,961 $132,251 $0

IFAD $1,677,798 $3,642,675 $3,043,572

Ireland $5,060,746 $11,252,471 $5,157,012

Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $3,099,962 $6,481,137 $2,459,066


Japan $534,299 $941,475 $0

Norway $9,625,886 $7,519,419 $11, 341,557

Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $2,110,328 $0 $3,338,066

UNDP $954,363 $460,350 $686,379

UNIDO $936,289 $238,069 $487,532

USAID $10,584,004 $4,540,772 $10,605,565

World Bank $0 $8,508,322 $9,550,468

Page | 56

Integrated Rural Development (2010/11FY)

Integrated Rural Development Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


$21,131,276 $16,914,477 $11,785,985

AfDB $0 $437,353 $609,030

EU $12,189,846 $5,869,073 $1,300,860

FAO $0 $46,390 $287,071

GDC $3,777,341 $2,048,930 $3,376,843

IFAD $2,879,949 $4,599,284 $1,388,799

Ireland $0 $0 $1,727,364

Japan $537,815 $1,438,649 $802,914

UNDP $1,746,326 $2,375,376 $1,732,899

USAID $0 $99,422 $560,204

Page | 57

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources (2010/11FY)

Environment, Lands and Natual Resources Summary Table (2008/09-2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


EU $1,803,264 $254,959 $1,756,098

Ireland $0 $0 $19,989

Japan $8,736,673 $13,130,698 $13,478,380

Norway $2,077,681 $3,574,695 $5,466,035

UNDP $128,810 $339,486 $611,131

UNESCO $0 $1,100 $0

USAID $1,399,103 $599,181 $0

World Bank $3,695,997 $1,677,394 $4,789,479

Page | 58

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture (2010/11FY)

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $705,789 $30,699,016 $33,549,073

Norway $535,449 $699,016 $634,233

People's Republic of China $0 $30,000,000 $32,891,650

UNESCO $0 $0 $23,191

USAID $170,340 $0 $0

Norway 2 %

People's Republic of

China 98 %

UNESCO < 1 %

Page | 59

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation (2010/11FY)

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


AfDB $12,187,524 $7,561,932 $8,053,364

BADEA $0 $3,125,898 $6,113,005

AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000

Canada $204,127 $0 $0

DfID $453,775 $729,243 $1,223,601

EU $0 $2,850,885 $0

FICA $0 $714,726 $0

GDC $64,062 $0 $0

ICEIDA $929,099 $899,328 $539,073

Japan $3,247,310 $2,685,034 $798,136

OPEC Fund $0 $1,362,896 $1,690,461

Republic of India $0 $0 $30,000,000

UNICEF $0 $1,989,927 $6,806,495

USAID $393,824 $22,352,975 $18,632,000

World Bank $9,884,564 $26,157,133 $13,948,836

Page | 60

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development (2010/11FY)

DfID<1%

EU<1%

Republic of India 77%

UNDP1%

UNIDO<1%

USAID2%

World Bank20%

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $7,635,528 $5,872,146 $28,111,982

DfID $675,787 $252,827 $10,501

EU $209,178 $0 $1,571

Republic of India $0 $0 $21,678,694

UNDP $855,972 $543,959 $455,066

UNIDO $498,960 $190,241 $24,200

USAID $2,226,623 $846,887 $545,110

World Bank $3,169,008 $4,038,232 $5,396,840

Page | 61

MGDS THEME 2 – SOCIAL PROTECTION AND DISASTER RISK

MANAGEMENT

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management

Page | 62

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management (2010/11FY)

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


DfID $439,031 $1,421,752 $2,843,905

FAO $29,841 $0 $0

Ireland $1,200,935 $1,772,325 $3,357,365

Japan $0 $43,401 $0

Norway $0 $0 $1,675,539

UNICEF $0 $20,031 $6,815

UNDP $1,474,747 $1,494,144 $1,476,229

USAID $319,440 $246,678 $13,606

World Bank $0 $4,073,267 $0

WFP $28,020,849 $9,056,843 $10,610,565

Page | 63

MGDS THEME 3 –SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT

Health

Education

Gender, Youth Development and Sports

Page | 64

Health (2010/11FY)

Page | 65

Health Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

HEALTH $254,019,865 $191,780,695 $298,199,442

AfDB $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244

Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244

Canada $49,411 $2,929,399 $1,314,302

Of which Sector Support - NAC $49,411 $0 $0

CDC $4,172,202 $11,365,622 $24,668,969

DfID $29,691,477 $28,919,354 $36,443,467

Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $476,409 $534,857 $492,404

Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $20,706,091 $19,007,280 $24,083,548

Of which Sector Support - NAC $7,359,750 $6,797,216 $6,536,628

EU $6,441,060 $771,168 $638,703

FICA $330,120 $2,748,893 $1,400,987

Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $2,748,893 $1,400,987

FAO $13,732 $148,175 $53,699

GDC $8,869,073 $6,091,163 $2,578,222

Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $6,692,816 $3,521,623 $0

Global Fund $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178

Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $0 $0 $16,083,750



ICEIDA $2,011,624 $861,896 $816,801

Ireland $29,985 $0 $2,890,442

Japan $1,534,314 $1,424,425 $497,880

Norway $23,135,630 $27,239,646 $8,869,352


Of which Sector Support - NAC $2,326,627 $2,356,749 $0

UNFPA $34,568 $278,578 $1,464,370

UNICEF $0 $3,481,715 $10,480,461

Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $300,000

UNDP $2,276,453 $2,516,743 $2,059,349

UNHCR $166,814 $186,182 $170,642

UNAIDS $333,689 $302,247 $483,825

Of which Sector Support - NAC $295,566 $60,000 $38,441

USAID $50,901,086 $64,718,467 $74,563,610

World Bank $3,689,202 $0 $11,585,639

Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $3,000,000 $0 $0


WHO $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299

Page | 66

Education (2010/11FY)

Education Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Education $73,383,459 $101,905,529 $167,676,973

AfDB $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129

Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129

Canada $7,752,387 $3,730,901 $2,181,898

DfID $20,254,365 $20,800,887 $20,659,846

Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $0 $231,439 $862,522

Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $18,052,963

EU $124,230 $0 $0

GDC $5,706,763 $3,447,245 $11,927,240

Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $7,343,337

ICEIDA $2,098,270 $361,010 $459,239

Ireland $431,607 $372,760 $0

Japan $2,307,681 $3,931,821 $4,905,980


UNICEF $0 $4,218,321 $7,614,965

Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $648,341

UNESCO $0 $48,773 $231,351

USAID $5,778,640 $6,015,634 $19,327,512

World Bank $10,090,656 $13,149,594 $41,473,218


WFP $17,261,317 $5,205,402 $11,557,705

Page | 67

Gender, Youth Development and Sports (2010/11FY)

Gender, Youth Development and Sports Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


AfDB $5,145,730 $241,313 $0

Canada $187,317 $2,892 $0

Ireland $0 $0 $27,992

Norway $3,282,414 $1,382,085 $2,023,117

UNFPA $0 $0 $534,085

UNICEF $0 $1,769,905 $4,475,094

UNDP $2,271,639 $1,749,148 $1,089,986

UNAIDS $0 $186,526 $115,406

USAID $0 $13,586 $173,422

World Bank $0 $0 $515,025

Page | 68

MGDS THEME 4 – INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT

Roads, Public Works and Transport Administration

Information Technology

Energy and Mining

Page | 69

Roads, Public Works and Transport (2010/11FY)

Roads, Public Works and Transport Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Roads, Public Works and Transport $44,381338 $61,242,346 $99,245,198

AfDB $0 $0 $125,906

BADEA $656,434 $2,924,035 $8,470,385

DfID $204,744 $151,774 $456,418

EU $35,732,177 $11,627,472 $9,817,137

Japan $3,731,963 $636,264 $4,906,578

Kuwait Fund $478,906 $0 $0

OPEC Fund $143,000 $1,323,267 $2,495,871


Republic of India $65,028 $5,591,312 $21,678,694

World Bank $3,369,087 $15,688,222 $27,994,209

Page | 70

Energy and Mining (2010/11FY)

DfID2%

EU9%

Japan 70%

UNDP19%

Energy and Mining Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


DfID $0 $0 $83,513

EU $0 $0 $422,300

Japan $1,210,478 $3,184,129 $3,377,383

UNDP $487,407 $404,986 $936,198

UNIDO $46,370 $35,000 $0

Page | 71

Information Technology (2010/11FY)

World Bank100%

Information Technology Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Information Technology $888,386 $9,633,484 $823,593

UNDP $888,386 $279,789 $0

World Bank $0 $9,353,695 $823,593

Page | 72

MGDS THEME 5 – IMPROVED GOVERNANCE

Democratic Governance

Economic Governance

Public Administration

Page | 73

Democratic Governance (2010/11FY)

Democratic Governance Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


Canada $1,283,722 $892,328 $307,346

DfID $9,853,144 $5,692,951 $6,168,631

EU $19,066,465 $4,668,558 $3,219,927

GDC $1,554,315 $1,153,143 $139,655

Ireland $2,600,094 $1,603,446 $1,978,820

Norway $5,123,649 $1,924,433 $2,074,861

People's Republic of China $0 $50,000,000 $0

UNDP $21,903,536 $7,149,812 $3,482,572

UNHCR $687,430 $759,424 $648,430

USAID $2,425,402 $324,495 $82,963

Page | 74

Economic Governance (2010/11FY)

Economic Governance Summary Table (20108/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


AfDB $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183

Of which Budget Support $37,817,562 $12,012,879 $5,160,183

Canada $628,666 $49,386 $0

DfID $41,283,429 $31,596,824 $32,358,849


EU $49,288,542 $90,975,927 $61,092,550


GDC $1,582,608 $14,519,859 $4,534,596

Of which Budget Support $0 $13,081,661 $3,303,306

Ireland $164,918 $288,903 $66,066

Japan $674,160 $2,462,573 $2,206,660

Norway $14,793,466 $15,483,618 $8,476,687


UNFPA $0 $0 $1,255,675

UNICEF $0 $1,658,682 $5,229,923

UNDP $2,609,441 $2,896,719 $6,081,026

World Bank $32,980,921 $52,527,429 $149,403

Of which Budget Support $30,000,000 $52,527,429 $149,403

Page | 75

Public Administration 2010/11FY

Ireland1%

UNDP16%

World Bank83%

Public Administration Summary Table (2008/09FY - 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


Canada $754,345 $0 $0

Ireland $0 $0 $91,455

UNDP $1,310,334 $1,615,470 $1,472,544

World Bank $0 $3,896,777 $7,678,095

Page | 76

DONOR ANALYSIS

Page | 77

DONOR ANALYSIS –CABS DONORS

African Development Bank

European Union

Norway

Department for International Development, UK (DfID)

World Bank

German Development Cooperation (GDC)

Page | 78

African Development Bank (2010/11FY)

AfDB – Summary Table (2008/09Fy -2010/11FY, USD) 2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

AfDB $72,405,737 $62,484,831 $29,197,764

Agriculture $9,249,347 $28,063,311 $2,918,909



Education $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129

Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $1,707,457 $10,745,544 $7,511,129

Gender, Youth Development and Sports $5,145,730 $241,313 $0

HEALTH $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244

Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $6,298,118 $3,422,500 $4,819,244

Integrated Rural Development $0 $437,353 $609,030

Roads, Public Works and Transport $0 $0 $125,906


Page | 79

European Union (2010/11FY)

EU – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

EU $138,817,040 $154,205,498 $96,806,731

Agriculture $13,962,277 $37,077,045 $18,557,585

Of which Budget Support $0 $21,590,186 $0

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $7,226,583 $144,148 $1,579,297

Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $0 $11,881,391 $15,537,165



Budget Support $45,317,659 $88,462,567 $56,372,458

Education $124,230 $0 $0

Energy and Mining $0 $0 $422,300

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $1,803,264 $254,959 $1,756,098

HEALTH $6,441,060 $771,168 $638,703




Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $209,178 $0 $1,571

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $2,850,885 $0

Page | 80

Norway (2010/11FY)

Norway – Summary Table (2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Norway $58,574,174 $57,822,913 $40,565,123

Agriculture $9,625,886 $7,519,419 $11,342,557

Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Pooled $2,110,328 $0 $3,338,066




Education $0 $0 $0



HEALTH $23,135,630 $27,239,646 $8,869,352


Of which Sector Support - NAC $2,326,627 $2,356,749 $0

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $535,449 $699,016 $634,233

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $0 $1,675,539

Page | 81

Department for International Development (2010/11FY)

Agriculture 9%


6%

Economic Governance

29%

Education 19%

Energy and Mining <1%

HEALTH 33%

Roads, Public Works and Transport

<1%

Trade, Industry and

Private Sector Development

<1%

Vulnerability, Disaster and

Risk Management

3%

Water,Sanitation and

Irrigation 1%

DfID – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/90FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

DfID $110,372,455 $96,551,021 $110,079,528

Agriculture $7,516,705 $6,985,409 $9,830,797

Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $298,928 $429,943 $616,478





Education $20,254,365 $20,800,887 $20,659,846

Of which Education SWAp - Discrete $0 $231,439 $862,522

Of which Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $29,330 $18,052,963

Energy and Mining $0 $0 $83,513

HEALTH $29,691,477 $28,919,354 $36,443,467

Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $476,409 $534,857 $492,404



Roads, Public Works and Transport $204,744 $151,774 $456,418

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $675,787 $252,827 $10,501

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $439,031 $1,421,752 $2,843,905

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $453,775 $729,243 $1,223,601

Page | 82

World Bank (2010/11FY)

World Bank – Summary Table (2008/09FY - 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

World Bank $66,879,435 $139,070,065 $123,904,806

Agriculture $0 $8,508,322 $9,550,468

Economic Governance $32,980,921 $52,527,429 $149,403

Of which Budget Support $30,000,000 $52,527,429 $149,403

Education $10,090,656 $13,149,594 $41,473,218


Energy and Mining $0 $0 $0


Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $0 $515,025

Health $3,689,202 $0 $11,585,639

Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $3,000,000 $0 $0


Information Technology $0 $9,353,695 $823,593

Public Administration $0 $3,896,777 $7,488,201


Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development

$3,169,008 $4,038,232 $5,396,840

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $4,073,267 $0


Page | 83

German Development Cooperation (2010/11FY)


1%

Economic Governance

20%

Education 53%

HEALTH 11%

Integrated Rural

Development

15%

GDC – Summary Table (2008/09FY– 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

GDC $21,554,162 $27,260,340 $22,556,557

Democratic Governance $1,554,315 $1,153,143 $139,655


Of which Budget Support $0 $13,081,661 $3,303,306

Education $5,706,763 $3,447,245 $11,927,240


HEALTH $8,869,073 $6,091,163 $2,578,222

Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $6,692,816 $3,521,623 $0


Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $64,062 $0 $0

Page | 84

DONOR ANALYSIS – DISCRETE DONORS

Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID)

Canada

Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Flemish International Cooperation Agency (FICA)

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria

(Global Fund)

Iceland International Development Agency (ICEIDA)

International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)

Ireland

Japan

US Agency for International Development (USAID)

Page | 85

Australian Agency for International Development (2010/11FY)

Water, Sanitation

and Irrigation

100%

AusAID – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

AusAID $0 $0 $1,500,000

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $0 $1,500,000

Page | 86

Canada (2010/11FY)


8%

Education 57%

HEALTH 35%

Canada – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Canada $10,859,976 $7,604,906 $3,803,546

Democratic Governance $1,283,722 $892,328 $307,346

Economic Governance $628,666 $49,386 $0

Education $7,752,387 $3,730,901 $2,181,898

Gender, Youth Development and Sports $187,317 $2,892 $0

HEALTH $49,411 $2,929,399 $1,314,302


Public Administration $754,345 $0 $0

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $204,127 $0 $0

Page | 87

Centre for Disease Control (2010/11FY)

Health 100%

CDC –Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

CDC $4,024,497 $11,365,622 $24,668,969

Health $4,024,497 $11,365,622 $24,668,969

Page | 88

Flemish International Cooperation Agency (2010/11FY)

Agriculture 61%

HEALTH 39%

FICA- Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

FICA $3,063,731 $6,212,154 $5,773,121

Agriculture $2,733,611 $2,748,535 $4,372,134

HEALTH $330,120 $2,748,893 $1,400,987

Of which Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $2,748,893 $1,400,987

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $714,726 $0

Page | 89

The Global Fund (2010/11FY)

Health 100%

Global Fund – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Global Fund (HIV/AIDS & Malaria) $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178

HEALTH $111,770,649 $29,428,797 $109,650,178

Of which Health SWAp - Discrete $0 $0 $16,083,750



Page | 90

Iceland International Development Agency (2010/11FY)

Education 25%

HEALTH 45%

Water, Sanitation

and Irrigation 30%

ICEIDA – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

ICEIDA $5,503,954 $2,254,485 $1,815,113

Agriculture $464,961 $132,251 $0

Education $2,098,270 $361,010 $459,239

Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $0 $0

HEALTH $2,011,624 $861,896 $816,801

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $929,099 $899,328 $539,073

Page | 91

International Fund for Agricultural Development (2010/11FY)

Agriculture 69%

Integrated Rural

Development

31%

IFAD - Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

IFAD $4,557,746 $8,241,959 $4,432,371

Agriculture $1,677,798 $3,642,675 $3,043,572


Page | 92

Ireland (2010/11FY)

Agriculture 34%


13%

Economic Governance

<1%

Environment, Lands and

Natural Resources

<1%

Gender, Youth Development

and Sports <1%

HEALTH 19%

Integrated Rural

Development 11%


1%


Risk Management

22%

Ireland - Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Ireland $9,488,284 $15,289,905 $15,316,506

Agriculture $5,060,746 $11,252,471 $5,157,012

Of which Farm Input Subsidy Program - Discrete $3,099,962 $6,481,137 $2,459,066



Economic Governance $164,918 $288,903 $66,066

Education $431,607 $372,760 $0

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $0 $0 $19,989


HEALTH $29,985 $0 $2,890,442

Integrated Rural Development $0 $0 $1,727,364

Public Administration $0 $0 $91,455


Page | 93

Japan (2010/11FY

Economic Governance

7%

Education 16%

Energy and Mining 11%

Environment, Lands and

Natural Resources

43%

HEALTH 2%

Integrated Rural

Development

3%

Roads, Public Works and

Transport 16%

Water, Sanitation and

Irrigation 2%

Japan – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Japan $22,514,693 $29,878,468 $30,973,911

Agriculture $534,299 $941,475 $0

Economic Governance $674,160 $2,462,573 $2,206,660

Education $2,307,681 $3,931,821 $4,905,980



HEALTH $1,534,314 $1,424,425 $497,880

Integrated Rural Development $537,815 $1,438,649 $802,914

Roads, Public Works and Transport $3,731,963 $636,264 $4,906,578

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $0 $0 $0

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $43,401 $0

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $3,247,310 $2,685,034 $798,136

Page | 94

United States Agency for International Development

(2010/11FY)

Agriculture 9%


<1%

Education 16%


and Sports <1%

HEALTH 60%

Integrated Rural

Development <1%

Trade, Industry and

Private Sector Development

<1%


Risk Management

<1%


Irrigation 15%

USAID – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

USAID $74,198,462 $99,758,097 $124,503,992

Agriculture $10,584,004 $4,540,772 $10,605,565

Democratic Governance $2,425,402 $324,495 $82,963

Education $5,778,640 $6,015,634 $19,327,512

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $1,399,103 $599,181 $0

Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $13,586 $173,422

HEALTH $50,901,086 $64,718,467 $74,563,610


Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $170,340 $0 $0

Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $2,226,623 $846,887 $545,110

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $319,440 $246,678 $13,606

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $393,824 $22,352,975 $18,632,000

Page | 95

DONOR ANALYSIS – UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)

United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization

(UNESCO)

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)

United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)

World Food Organization (WFP)

World Health Organization (WHO)

Page | 96

Food and Agriculture Organization (2010/11FY)

Agriculture 90%

HEALTH 2%

Integrated Rural

Development 8%

FAO – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

FAO $4,189,730 $3,938,388 $3,518,605

Agriculture $4,146,157 $3,743,823 $3,177,835

HEALTH $13,732 $148,175 $53,699


Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $29,841 $0 $0

Page | 97

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2010/11FY)


79%

HEALTH 21%

UNHCR – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

UNHCR $854,244 $945,606 $819,072

Democratic Governance $687,430 $759,424 $648,430

HEALTH $166,814 $186,182 $170,642

Page | 98

United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization

(2010/11FY)

Education 91%

Tourism, Wildlife and

Culture 9%

UNESCO – Summary Table (2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

UNESCO $0 $49,873 $254,542

Education $0 $48,773 $231,351

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $0 $1,100 $0

Information Technology $0 $0 $0

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $0 $0 $23,191

Page | 99

United Nations Industrial Development Organization

(2010/11FY)

Agriculture 95%

Trade, Industry and Private

Sector Development

5%

UNIDO – Summary Table (2008/09FY -20101/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

UNIDO $1,481,619 $463,310 $511,732

Agriculture $936,289 $238,069 $487,532

Economic Governance $0 $0 $0

Energy and Mining $46,370 $35,000 $0


Page | 100

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (2010/11FY)


and Sports19%

HEALTH 81%

UNAIDS – Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

UNAIDS $333,689 $488,773 $599,231

Agriculture $0 $0 $0

Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $186,526 $115,406

HEALTH $333,689 $302,247 $483,825

Of which Sector Support - NAC $295,566 $60,000 $38,441

Page | 101

United Nations Development Programme (2010/11FY)

Agriculture 4%


17%

Economic Governance

30%Energy and Mining

5%Environment, Lands and

Natural Resources

3%


and Sports 6%

HEALTH 10%

Integrated Rural

Development

9%


7%

Trade, Industry and Private

Sector Development

2%


Risk Management

7%

UNDP - Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

UNDP $36,907,414 $21,825,982 $20,083,379

Agriculture $954,363 $460,350 $686,379



Energy and Mining $487,407 $404,986 $936,198

Environment, Lands and Natural Resources $128,810 $339,486 $611,131


HEALTH $2,276,453 $2,516,743 $2,059,349

Information Technology $888,386 $279,789 $0





Page | 102

United Nations Children’s Fund (2010/11FY)

Economic Governance

15%

Education 22%


and Sports 13%

HEALTH 30%


Risk Management

<1%


Irrigation 20%

UNICEF – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

UNICEF $0 $13,138,581 $34,613,753

Economic Governance $0 $1,658,682 $5,229,923

Education $0 $4,218,321 $7,614,965

Education SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $648,341

Gender, Youth Development and Sports $0 $1,769,905 $4,475,094

HEALTH $0 $3,481,715 $10,480,461

Health SWAp - Pooled $0 $0 $300,000

Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management $0 $20,031 $6,815

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $1,989,927 $6,806,495

Page | 103

United Nations Population Fund (2010/11FY)

Economic Governance

39%

Gender, Youth Development and Sports

16%

Health45%

UNFPA – Summary Table (2008/09FY - 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 209/10FY 2010/11FY

UNFPA $34,568 $278,578 $3,254,130

Economic Governance $0 $0 $1,255,675

Education $0 $0 $0


Health $34,568 $278,578 $1,464,370

Integrated Rural Development $0 $0 $0

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $0 $0 $0

Page | 104

World Food Programme (2010/11FY)

Education 52%

Vulnerability,Disaster

and Risk Management

48%

WFP - Summary Table (2008/09FY -2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

World Food Programme $45,282,166 $14,262,245 $22,168,270

Education $17,261,317 $5,205,402 $11,557,705


Page | 105

World Health Organization (2010/11FY)

Health100%

WHO – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

World Health Organization $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299

Health $2,270,658 $4,945,726 $2,749,299

Page | 106

DEVELOPMENT PARTNER ANALYSIS – EMERGING DONORS

People’s Republic of China

Republic of India

Arab Donors:

Arab Bank for Economic Development

OPEC Fund

Kuwait Fund

Page | 107

People’s Republic of China (2010/11FY)

Education 42%


Transport 24%


Culture 34%

`

P. R. China – Summary Table (2008/09FY – 2010/11FY, USD)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY


Democratic Governance $0 $50,000,000 $0

Education $0 $30,000,000 $39,959,749

Roads, Public Works and Transport $0 $23,300,000 $23,300,000

Tourism, Wildlife and Culture $0 $30,000,000 $32,891,650

Page | 108

Republic of India (2010/11FY)

Education 42%

Roads, Public Works

and Transport

24%


Culture 34%

Republic of India – Summary Table (2008/08FY- 2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Republic of India $65,028 $5,591,312 $73,357,388


Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development $0 $0 $21,678,694

Water, Sanitation and Irrigation $0 $0 $30,000,000

Page | 109

Arab Bank for Economic Development (2010/11FY)


Transport 58%


Irrigation 42%

BADEA - Summary Table (2008/09 FY - 2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

BADEA $656,434 $6,049,933 $14,583,390



Page | 110

OPEC Fund (2010/11FY)

Roads, Public Works and Transport

60%


Irrigation 40%

OPEC Fund - Summary Table (2008/08FY - 2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

OPEC Fund $143,000 $2,686,163 $4,186,332

Education $0 $0 $0

HEALTH $0 $0 $0



Page | 111

Kuwait Fund

Kuwait Fund- Summary Table (2008/08FY - 2010/11FY)

2008/09FY 2009/10FY 2010/11FY

Kuwait Fund $478,906 $0 $0

Roads, Public Works and Transport $478,906 $0 $0

Page | 112

ANNEX I: Definition and List of Project Implementing Units Project Implementation Unit -

Embedded When providing development assistance in a country some donors establish

Project Implementation Units (They are also commonly referred to as project

management units, project management consultants, project management

offices, project coordination offices etc.). These are dedicated management units

designed to support the implementation and administration of projects or

programmes. PIUs typically share the following key features:

PIUs are TYPICALLY required to perform subsidiary (rather than principal) tasks with regard to the implementation of a project or programme: monitoring and reporting on technical and/or financial progress, accounting, procurement of works, goods and services, drawing-up of terms of reference, contract supervision, detailed design or equipment specification.

PIUs are often established at the request of a donor following the inception of a project or programme.

The staff of PIUs vary considerably in size and composition. Staff size can vary from 1 to as many as 200 but most count less than 10 professional staff. Although a significant number of PIUs make use of government staff, most PIUs are externally recruited (e.g. long-term local consultants).

A distinction is made here between a PIU and technical advice provided directly to national administrations.

Parallel PIU

A PIU is parallel when it is created and operates outside existing country

institutional and administrative structures at the behest of a donor. In practice,

there is a continuum between parallel and integrated PIUs. The criteria below

have been designed to help donors and partner authorities draw a line within this

continuum and identify with greater certainty parallel PIUs.

For the purpose of this Survey, PIUs are said to be parallel when they meet the

above criteria as well as three out of the four criteria set out below (anything less

counts as integrated):

Criterion 1: Are the PIUs accountable to the external funding agencies/donors

rather than to the country implementing agencies (ministries, departments,

agencies etc)? (Y/N)

Criterion 2: Are the terms of reference for externally appointed staff determined

by the donor (rather than by the country implementing agencies)? (Y/N)

Criterion 3: Is most of the professional staff appointed by the donor (rather than

the country implementing agencies)? (Y/N)

Criterion 4: Is the salary structure of national staff (including benefits) higher

than those of civil service personnel? (Y/N)

Technical Assistance Technical co-operation is the provision of know-how in the form of personnel,

training, research and associated costs. More broadly, technical co-operation

refers to contributions to Malawi’s development agenda primarily through the

medium of education and training.

Source: OECD DAC 2011 Survey for Monitoring the Paris Declaration for the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness.

Page | 113

List of Project Implementing Units

Donor Project Title Type of

PIU

Project Status as of June

2011 Type Of

Assistance Primary Sector

Implementing Partner

AfDB

Lake Malawi Artisanal Fisheries Development Project

Embedded

Active - Grant and - Concessional Loan

Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security

AfDB

Smallholder crop production and marketing project

Parallel Active Grant Water, Sanitation and Irrigation

Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development

AfDB

Support to Local Economic Development

Parallel Active Concessional Loan


Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development

AfDB

EDUCATION V Parallel Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

AfDB

National Water Development Program

Embedded

Active Concessional Loan and grant



CDC

Supporting the Scale-up of High Quality HIV Care and Treatment Programs in Malawi through a Strengthened Laboratory Infrastructure

Parallel Active Grant Health College of Medicine

CDC

Supporting the Scale-up of High Quality HIV Care and Treatment Programs in Malawi through a Strengthened Laboratory Infrastructure.(ahaoward University)

Parallel Active Grant Health Howard University

CDC

Leadership Development and Management Capacity Building for National and District Level Public Health Managers

Parallel Active Grant Health College of Medicine

Page | 114

CDC

Building human and institutional capacity in training and strategic information

Parallel Active Grant Health International Training and Education Center for Health (I-TECH)

DFID

Inputs and Maize Market (FA) - previous name was Agriculture Inputs Subsidy (FA)

Embedded

Active Grant Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security

DFID

Inputs and Maize Market (TC)

Embedded

Active Technical Assistance

Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security

DFID

EIMU Support FA Embedded

Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

DFID

EIMU Support TC Embedded


Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

DFID

Support to national AIDS Response (FA)

Embedded

Active Grant Health Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission

EU

Emergency Food Aid

Embedded

Active Grant Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management

World Food Programme

EU

Rule of Law Institutional Support

Embedded

Active Grant Democratic Governance

Ministry of Justice

EU

Mangochi-Monkey Bay Road

Embedded

Active Grant Roads, Public Works and Transport


EU

Farm Income Diversification Programme

Embedded

Active Grant Agriculture Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security

EU

Good Governance Programme (GGP)

Embedded


Ministry of Finance

EU

NAO Capacity Building Programme

Embedded


Economic Governance

Ministry of Finance

EU

Rural Feeder Roads

Embedded


Roads Authority

EU

Institutional Support to Transport Public Sector - old name Institutional Support to Transport Public

Embedded



Page | 115

Bodies

EU

Capacity Building for Non State Actors - Old name Non State Actors (NSA)

Embedded


EU

Forestry Management for Sustainable Livelihoods

Embedded

Active Grant Environment, Lands and Natural Resources

Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources

EU

Income Generating Public Works

Embedded


-

EU

Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods II

Embedded

Active Grant Environment, Lands and Natural Resources

-

EU

FOOD SECURITY PROGRAMME MAFSP 2005

Embedded

Active Grant Agriculture -

ICEIDA

Support to the National Adult Literacy Programme in TA Nankumba

Parallel Active Grant Gender, Youth Development and Sports

Ministry of Woman and Child Development

ICEIDA

Monkey Bay Community Hospital Project *

Parallel Active Grant Health Ministry of Health

JICA

Technical Cooperation / the Community Vitalization and Afforestration in the Middle Shire

Embedded

Active Grant Energy and Mining

Ministry of Energy and Mines

UNDP

Development Assistance Coordination Unit (DACU)

Embedded

Active Grant Economic Governance

Ministry of Finance

UNDP

Malawi Democracy Consolidated Programme (MDCP) III

Parallel Active Grant Democratic Governance

Office of the President and Cabinet

UNDP

Poverty and Environment Initiative

Parallel Active Grant Vulnerability, Disaster and Risk Management

Office of the President and Cabinet

UNDP

Millennium Villages - Mwandama

Parallel Active Grant Integrated Rural Development

Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security

UNDP

Millennium Villages - Lilongwe Village (Gumulira)

Parallel Active Grant Integrated Rural Development

Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security

Page | 116

UNESCO

Capacity Building for EFA: Strengthening the TVET System in Malawi: Policy, pedagogical and institutional capacity development

Embedded

Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

UNHCR

Ministry of Home Affairs

Embedded


Ministry of Home Affairs and Internal Security

UNHCR

Ministry of Health Embedded

Active Grant Health Ministry of Health

UNAIDS

HIV/AIDS activities with NAC

Embedded

Active Grant Health Nutrition, HIV and AIDS and National AIDS Commission

UNAIDS

HIV/AIDS activities with MoWCD, MDF and Police

Embedded

Active Grant Gender, Youth Development and Sports

Ministry of Woman and Child Development

USAID

TBCAP SUPPORT TO THE MALAWI NATIONAL TB PROGRAM

Parallel Active Grant Health MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH

USAID

USAID INITIATIVE FOR LONG TERM TRAINING CAPACITY BUILDING IN MALAWI (UILTCB)

Parallel Active Grant Agriculture World Bank

USAID

Millennium Challenge Account Compact - Power Generation

Parallel Active Grant Energy and Mining

Ministry of Energy and Mines

WB

Second National Water Project (World Bank)




WB

Community Based Rural Land Development

Parallel Active Grant Environment, Lands and Natural Resources

Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources

WB

Education Sector Support Project

Parallel Active Grant Education Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

WB

Irrigation, Rural Livelihoods and Agriculture Development (IRLAD)

Parallel Active Grant Water, Sanitation and Irrigation


Page | 117

WB

Infrastructure Services Project

Parallel Active Grant Roads, Public Works and Transport

Ministry of Economic Planning and Development

WB

Business Environment Strengthening (BESTAP)

Parallel Active Grant Trade, Industry and Private Sector Development

Ministry of Industry and Trade

WB

Third Social Action Fund APL 2



Ministry of Finance

WB

Community Based Rural Land 2 (Pipeline Project)

Parallel Active Grant Agriculture -

WB

Regional Communications Infrastructure Program - Phase 3

Parallel Active Grant Information Technology

-

WB

Malawi Third Social Action Fund (MASAF 3) (LDF Mechanism)

Embedded

Active - Agriculture - Education - Public Administration - Roads, Public Works and Transport

-

BADEA

Small Farms Irrigation Project



Ministry of Irrigation and

Water Development

BADEA

Construction of Three Teachers Training Colleges in Rumphi, Mchinji and Chikwawa


Education Ministry of Education,

Science and Technology

Documents

MALAWI AID ATLAS 2010/11FY - UNDP...activities and plays a significant role in compiling aid reports and assisting with the aid coordination process. Most development partners still