Making sense of doi:10.4225/01/503C303E9B551

Digital Object Identifiers DOIs

3

Digital Object Identifiers 101

Carter, Damien J ; Raiteri, Paolo ; Rohl, Andrew L ( 2014 ): Input and selected output files for simulations of sunset yellow dimers. Curtin University. DOI: 10.4225/06/4ED6B979EBGE6.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/06/4ED6B979EBGE6

4

Y-Oh-Y DOIs??

• Easy and persistent access to online research data

• Disambiguation and accuracy for authors, datasets

• Linked discovery, retrieval and management of data:• Citation• Data reuse• Syndication

• Support for automated tracking of data outputs• Indexing services - Thomson Reuters Data Citation Index • Altmetrics - views, downloads and 'likes’

7

DOIs connect your profile

DOIs for Publications

DOIs for Data

DOIs for Software

http://researchdata.ands.org.au/input-selected-output-yellow-dimers/445769

9

DOIs in the 20th Century

DOI.org • First DOI minted in 2000• 72+ million registered DOI names• 1+ billion DOI resolutions in 2014

DOIs for Data • DataCite.org• 4+ million DOIs for datasets

NISO RP-15-2013 Recommended Practice on Online Supplemental Journal Article Materials• DOIs are recommended for all Supplemental Material types

10

DOIs in the 21st Century

http://www.datacite.org/

11

DOI options for institutions

mints DOIs for publishers:

• journal articles • datasets

Machine2MachineCiteMyData

ManualMyDOIs

12

DOIs options for researchers

1. deposit in your repository • automatically assign eg CSIRO, Griffith University• manually assign eg Curtin University

2. deposit in discipline repository • TERN• Pangaea, UK Data Archive, Dryad

3. deposit in commercial or other repository • Mint your own DOI through EZID http://ezid.cdlib.org/demo/simple

• Get it automatically: ResearchGate, Figshare

Specialization of the repository for your data

Prestige of the repository

Ease of the data submission process

Extent of metadata quality control (by the researcher or repository curators)

Trust in the persistence of the repository

Policies of the repository that promote scholarly credit (e.g. assigning DOIs)

Policies of the repository that limit reuse by others (licenses, embargoes)

Directed to choose the repository by your research funder, journal or institution

What Factors Influence Where Researchers Deposit their Data? A Survey of Researchers Submitting to Data Repositories. Shea Swauger, Todd J. Vision 2015, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 68-81 doi:10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.289

Deposition options for researchers

A small US study of 140 researchers depositing data in 2 data repositories found:

TreeBASE users ranked the domain specialization of the repository highest, while Dryad users ranked as equal highest:• their trust in the persistence of the repository and • the ease of its data submission process.

Interestingly, respondents (particularly Dryad users) were stronglydivided as to whether being directed to choose a particular repository by a journal policy or funding agency was among the most or least important factors.

Some users reported depositing their data in multiple repositories and archiving their data voluntarily.

Deposition options for researchers

What Factors Influence Where Researchers Deposit their Data? A Survey of Researchers Submitting to Data Repositories. Shea Swauger, Todd J. Vision 2015, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 68-81 doi:10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.289

The ResearchGate factor

http://www.researchgate.net/

2009 Started “when two researchers discovered first-hand that collaborating with a friend or colleague on the other side of the world was no easy task.”

By 2014 • 6 million members in total

• 1.5 million datasets were added to profiles in 2014 alone

• uploading 700 datasets per day

• August: “generate a … DOI for any unpublished research you’ve already added to your profile on ResearchGate”

In 2015…..

https://explore.researchgate.net/display/news/2014/08/13/Celebrating+five+million+members+with+free+DOIs

https://explore.researchgate.net/display/news/2014/08/13/Celebrating+five+million+members+with+free+DOIs

1

2

3

http://blog.impactstory.org/researchgate-doi/

How do we as data managers respond to this game change?

Making sense ofdoi:10.4225/01/503C303E9B551

http://research-hub.griffith.edu.au/display/n1bab3b2d8864bd2ac41fd8f8cf5dd116