Upload
elyse
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Making Reform Matter A D ata Walk. Uri Treisman The Charles A. Dana Center at The University of Texas at Austin. UDLN May 22, 2013. Higher than U.S. average Not measurably different from U.S. average Lower than U.S. average . PISA 2006 Mathematics. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Making Reform MatterA Data Walk
UDLN May 22, 2013
Uri TreismanThe Charles A. Dana Center
at The University of Texas at Austin
2
300
350
400
450
500
550
Aver
age
Scal
e Sc
ore
U.S.A.
Source: NCES, PISA 2006 Results, http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa/
Higher than U.S. average Not measurably different from U.S. average Lower than U.S. average
PISA 2006 MathematicsUSA ranked 25th out of 30 OECD countries
Source: Michael Marder, 2013; from PSID, CNEF, UNICEF, PISA datasets.
Source: Michael Marder, 2013; from PSID, CNEF, UNICEF, PISA datasets.
Pisa and Poverty --Reading
6
Other Countries’ Average Scale Score MathPerformance on 8th Grade TIMSS Comparedwith the U.S.
Source: Data taken from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), accessed Jan 10, 2013 at http://nces.ed.gov/timss/index.asp. Computations of categories by the Charles A. Dana Center.
6
1999 2003 2007 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
1725
3728
7
11
6
814
95
6 Higher than the U.S.
Same as the U.S.
Lower than the U.S.
Num
ber o
f Cou
ntrie
s
7
Mathematics Achievement at the 8th Grade (TIMSS 2011)Average scale score by country
7
Korea, Rep. of 613 Slovenia 505 Lebanon 449
Singapore 611 Hungary 505 Abu Dhabi-UAE 449
Chinese Taipei-CHN 609 Australia 505 Malaysia 440
Hong Kong-CHN 586 Alberta-CAN 505 Georgia 431
Japan 570 Lithuania 502 Thailand 427
Massachusetts-USA 561 TIMSS scale average 500 Macedonia, Rep. of 426
Minnesota-USA 545 Italy 498 Tunisia 425
Russian Federation 539 California-USA 493 Chile 416
North Carolina-USA 537 New Zealand 488 Iran, Islamic Rep. of 415
Quebec-CAN 532 Kazakhstan 487 Qatar 410
Indiana-USA 522 Sweden 484 Bahrain 409
Connecticut-USA 518 Ukraine 479 Jordan 406
Colorado-USA 518 Dubai-UAE 478 Palestinian Nat'l Auth. 404
Israel 516 Norway 475 Saudi Arabia 394
Finland 514 Armenia 467 Indonesia 386
Florida-USA 513 Alabama-USA 466 Syrian Arab Republic 380
Ontario-CAN 512 Romania 458 Morocco 371
United States 509 United Arab Emirates 456 Oman 366
England-GBR 507 Turkey 452 Ghana 331Source: Data taken from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), accessed Jan 10, 2013 at http://nces.ed.gov/timss/index.asp. Data display by the Charles A. Dana Center.
8 8
Science Achievement at the 8th Grade (TIMSS 2011)Average scale score by country
8
Singapore 590 Ontario-CAN 521 Chile 461Massachusetts-USA 567 Quebec-CAN 520 Abu Dhabi-UAE 461Chinese Taipei-CHN 564 Australia 519 Bahrain 452Korea, Rep. of 560 Israel 516 Thailand 451Japan 558 Lithuania 514 Jordan 449Minnesota-USA 553 New Zealand 512 Tunisia 439Finland 552 Sweden 509 Armenia 437Alberta-CAN 546 Italy 501 Saudi Arabia 436Slovenia 543 Ukraine 501 Malaysia 426Russian Federation 542 TIMSS scale average 500 Syrian Arab Republic 426Colorado-USA 542 California-USA 499 Palestinian Nat'l Auth. 420Hong Kong-CHN 535 Norway 494 Georgia 420England-GBR2 533 Kazakhstan 490 Oman 420Indiana-USA 533 Alabama-USA 485 Qatar 419Connecticut-USA 532 Dubai-UAE 485 Macedonia, Rep. of 407North Carolina-USA 532 Turkey 483 Lebanon 406Florida-USA 530 Iran, Islamic Rep. of 474 Indonesia 406
United States 525 Romania 465 Morocco 376Hungary 522 United Arab Emirates 465 Ghana 306Source: Data taken from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), accessed Jan 10, 2013 at http://nces.ed.gov/timss/index.asp. Data display by the Charles A. Dana Center.
Bachelor’s attainment for high-income young people is 68 points higher than
for low-income youth.
Source: “Bachelor’s Degree Attainment by Age 24 by Family Income Quartiles, 1970 to 2010.” Graphic: The Education Trust
9
NAEP Math: Grade 4
*Accommodations not permittedSource: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 249)
Graphic: The Education Trust
National Public – Grade 8 NAEP Math
*Accommodations not permitted
Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 299)
Source:
Scale Scores by State – Low-Income Students
NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 299)
Source:
Scale Scores by State – Higher Income Students
NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 299)
14
8th Grade Hispanic – Proficient
19% 23%10%
Note: Basic Scale Score = 243; Proficient Scale Score = 281Chart Source: Education Trust, 2011 NAEP TUDA ResultsData Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES
Urban Math PerformanceLatino students
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
Aver
age S
cale
Scor
e
Grade 8 – NAEP Math (2011)
Source: NCES, “Eighth-Grade Algebra: Findings from the Eighth-Grade Round of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K)” (2010), graph by Education Trust.
African-American students with strong math performance in the fifth grade are less likely to be placed in eighth grade algebra than are their
peers
Math classes at high-poverty, high-minority secondary schools are more likely to be taught by out-of-field* teachers.
Note: High-poverty school: 55 percent or more of the students are eligible for free/reduced-price lunch. Low-poverty school :15 percent or fewer of the students are eligible for free/reduced-price lunch. High-minority school: 78 percent or more of the students are black, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander. Low-minority school : 12 percent or fewer of the students are non-white students. *Teachers with neither certification nor major. Data for secondary-level core academic classes (math, science, social studies, English) across the U.S. Source: Education Trust Analysis of 2007-08 Schools and Staffing Survey data.
Source: Michael Marder, 2012.
Source: Michael Marder, 2012.
Now, instead of being the “land of opportunity,” the U.S. has one of lowest rates of intergenerational mobility.
United Kingdom
U.S. France Germany Sweden Canada Finland Norway Denmark0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.5 0.470.41
0.32 0.270.19 0.18 0.17 0.15
Earn
ings
Ela
stici
ty
Cross-country examples of the link between father and son wages
Source: Tom Hertz, “Understanding Mobility in America” (Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress, 2006). Graph by Education Trust.