Upload
ronald-zapata-vasquez
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A single well pumping and recovery test to measure in situ acrotelm transmissivity in raised bogs
Citation preview
A single well pumping and recovery test to measure in situ
acrotelm transmissivity in raised bogs
S. van der Schaaf*
Department of Environmental Sciences, Sub-department of Water Resources, Wageningen University,
Nieuwe Kanaal 11, 6709PA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Received 8 April 2003; revised 14 November 2003; accepted 10 December 2003
Abstract
A quasi-steady-state single pit pumping and recovery test to measure in situ the transmissivity of the highly permeable upper
layer of raised bogs, the acrotelm, is described and discussed. The basic concept is the expanding depression cone during both
pumping and recovery. It is shown that applying this concept yields comparable results from pumping test and recovery,
although the flexibility of the acrotelm matrix may cause considerable differences during individual tests.
q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Raised bogs; Acrotelm; Transmissivity; Pumping tests; Peat hydraulics
1. Introduction
The acrotelm is the shallow top layer of a living
raised bog. It includes the living peat moss at the
surface. In bogs of north-western Europe it is usually
between 10 and 40 cm deep. In its original concept, it
contains the oscillating water table (Ivanov, 1953;
cited by Ingram, 1978) and hence has rapidly
changing moisture conditions. Thus it is periodically
aerated, which causes a relatively rapid downward
increase in the degree of decomposition of its material
(Romanov, 1968). The term acrotelm was proposed
by Ingram (1978) and has become generally accepted
since. The peat body below the acrotelm is termed
catotelm. This so-called diplotelmic approach does
not imply a division into two soil horizons in the strict
sense, because the boundary between acrotelm and
catotelm is not defined in a measurable and repro-
ducible way. However, the diplotelmic approach has
proved a useful concept in understanding the
hydrology of raised bogs (Ingram and Bragg, 1984;
Van der Schaaf, 1996, 1998, 1999).
A hydrologically relevant feature of the acrotelm is
the downward increase in the degree of decompo-
sition, which implies a downward decrease in fiber
elasticity, an increase in the volume fraction of small
particles and hence a transition from large pores at the
surface to smaller pores downwards. Consequently, a
transition occurs from a large hydraulic conductivity
near the surface to considerably smaller values at
some decimeter depth. The difference may be up to
several orders of magnitude (Balyasova, 1979;
Ivanov, 1981). Some rather common values are
105 m d21 or larger close to the surface and
110 m d21 at some decimeters below it. The average
Journal of Hydrology 290 (2004) 152160
www.elsevier.com/locate/jhydrol
0022-1694/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.005
* Fax: 31-317-484885.E-mail address: [email protected] (S. van der Schaaf).
hydraulic conductivity of the catotelm is usually some
orders of magnitude smaller (Van der Schaaf, 1999).
Thus, in spite of its shallowness, the acrotelm is the
one and only aquifer in a raised bog. Because of the
sharp downward decrease in the hydraulic conduc-
tivity, the transmissivity of the acrotelm strongly
depends on the level of the water table and is a
regulating system for the outflow of water from a
raised bog (Verry et al., 1988; Van der Schaaf, 1999).
Hence, in hydrological studies of raised bogs,
information on transmissivity characteristics of the
acrotelm is almost indispensable.
The method to measure acrotelm transmissivity
described here was developed because classic
methods, such as Hooghoudts and Ernsts augerhole
method (Van Beers, 1963) could not be used because
the auger hole often filled up with water within a
second after water removal. Therefore a method was
developed, which is based on pumping during the test
instead of one where water is removed or added at the
start only.
2. Description of the tests
Square pits of approximately 25 25 40 cm3deep were cut with a spade at different locations on
the bogs Raheenmore Bog and Clara Bog, both in
Co. Offaly, Ireland. The pits were left to settle for at
least a day before tests were carried out. At each test,
the pit was pumped during 20 s to 5 min at a
constant rate of 110 l min21, depending on the
expected transmissivity and the expected drawdown
during the test. The small pump was a 12 V battery-
powered centrifuge type and a sieve was used to
prevent large peat particles in the pit from clogging
the pump (Fig. 1).
The discharge was controlled by connecting
different pre-calibrated lengths and diameters of
polythene tubing to the outlet of the pump. The
discharge was checked during tests with a calibrated
vessel and a stopwatch. The drawdown in the pit
should remain within a few centimeters from the
equilibrium level to prevent too much of the upper and
most permeable part of the acrotelm from being
excluded from the flow. Otherwise, a considerable
underestimation of the transmissivity might result.
Therefore, pumping was continued either until no
visible further drawdown occurred, or until the
drawdown had reached a value of 3 cm. In the latter
case the water table in the pit would often continue to
fall if the pumping was not stopped, because the flow
towards the pit would occur in less and less permeable
parts of the acrotelm. After the pumping had been
stopped, the water table in the pit would rise again and
a recovery test was done. Therefore, two sets of
equations had to be derived: one for the pumping test
itself and one for the recovery test.
3. Equations
3.1. The pumping test
Pumping until no visible further drawdown occurs
does not necessarily mean that steady state has been
attained. Therefore, the steady-state Thiem equation
was used as a basis to derive an equation to calculate
acrotelm transmissivity from the tests. Strictly speak-
ing, this may not be entirely justified, because during
any such test the depression cone will keep expand-
ing. However, close to the pit, the hydraulic gradient
does not change very much shortly after pumping
has started. This situation is termed transient steady
state by Kruseman and Ridder (1990). In this paper,
the usage of Thiems equation will be discussed later.
Fig. 1. Pumping test as carried out during the fieldwork.
S. van der Schaaf / Journal of Hydrology 290 (2004) 152160 153
At this stage, the equation is applied without further
comment. It reads
Q 2pTah2 2 h1ln
r2r1
1
where Q is well discharge (pumping rate) [L3T21], Tais acrotelm transmissivity [L2T21], h1 is phreatic level
[L] at a distance r1 [L] from the well and h2 is the
phreatic level at a distance r2 from the well.
Eq. (1) holds approximately if (Kruseman and
Ridder, 1990):
(a) the lateral extent of the aquifer is much larger
than the distance to which the phreatic level is
noticeably affected by the drawdown in the well;
(b) the aquifer is homogeneous in the horizontal
direction over the area in which the phreatic level
is noticeably influenced by the drawdown in the
well;
(c) the phreatic level was approximately horizontal
immediately before the test;
(d) the discharge rate was constant during the test;
(e) the well fully penetrates the aquifer;
(f) the flow is horizontal;
(g) the saturated depth of the acrotelm aquifer is
constant over the area in which the phreatic level
is noticeably affected by the drawdown in the
well.
Conditions (a), (c), (d), and (e) are normally
satisfied. Condition (b) is usually satisfied to a
reasonable extent if the site is properly chosen, e.g.
as much as possible in the middle of a microtopo-
graphical element, such as a hollow or a hummock.
Conditions (f) and (g) can be satisfied approximately
by keeping the drawdown in the well small, as
discussed in Section 2.
In Eq. (1), both r1 and r2 may be chosen arbitrarily,
as long as r1 r2 and at least equal to the well radiusrw: Hence, the radius r1 can be substituted by rw: If h2is the phreatic level immediately before the test, then
r2 is the distance to which the effect of the pumping
has extended. Theoretically this distance should be
infinite, but if the equation is combined with the
pumped volume of water, it will yield a finite value
for r2; as will be shown below. Then the difference
h2 2 h1 is the drawdown yw [L] in the well.
Substituting r1; h1 and h2 in Eq. (1) and writing Taexplicitly yields:
Ta Q ln
r2rw
2pyw2
Because the horizontal cross-section of the spade-dug
wells was approximately square, an effective rw was
to be found. This could be done by either calculating
the radius of a circle with the same area, which gives
an underestimation, or one with the same circumfer-
ence, which gives an overestimation. Averaging the
two yields
rw