1

Lao People’s Democratic RepublicPeace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity

Presented by:Planning and Evaluation Division

NLCRDPE Office

Main Out Put of Evaluation 285/PM

And Direction, Target 2011-15 and 2011-2012

Outline

Objective needed for monitoring /evaluation

Definition Poverty and Development Criteria

Research Methodology Time of Monitoring and

Evaluation Out Put of the evaluation Direction and Target of 5 year RDPE

2

Decree No 285/PM

legal document rectifying and improving the Order No9/PPB, the order No.13/PM on the Building of the developped Ban and Koumban

multisector-criteria consolidation as measurable comprehensive development standard for family, Ban, Koumban and district.

Objective needed for monitoring /evaluation

Within the NSEDP, Interventions focus on the family and Ban rather than District

Urgent questions to be answered

Right now how many poor families, Ban nd

Koumban. How many developed Ban and

Koumban

What are the prioritised targets

(geographical), needs (sectoral) 2015,

Definition Poverty criteria

Poverty: Poverty is the deprivation of basic needs for the daily livelihood such as shortage of food that cannot provide the energy of 2100 Kcal/day/person, deprivation of clothes, durable shelter, inability to afford for the health care in case of sickness, inability to afford for the elementary education, inability to have the access to public services.

5

Definition Poverty criteria

Development : Development is integrated success in development such as strong and firm institutional system, well – developed political awareness of people’s , social order and secure, well-developed social-economic infrastructure, pubic services accessible and eradicate poverty.

6

INDIVIDUAL’S POVERTY CRITEREA

The measurement basis: the monthly income per capita regardless gender, age

Unit: national currency KIP National average: 192 000

kip/month/person. Rural average: 180 000

kip/month/person Urban average: 240 000

kip/month/person.

7

Evaluation Methodology -

Questionnaires: prepared by Team of ( the Lao National census of agriculture, National Statistics Centre and NLCRDPE Office

Training for Provinces & Districts: 4 parts.

District’s training for Naiban, mobilisers, sectoral staff

Poverty : -interview, discussion and observation with each family

Development: Village committee, community’s leaders consultation based on the sectoral assessment output

Evaluation Methodology

Village has poverty/development profile of each family

District has poverty/development profile of each village.

District: Data consolidation and report to Province.

Province: consolidation -and verification

Provincial consultation meeting chaired by Governor. Output democratically certified and submitted to National

NLRDPE Nationwide and MPI:consolidation and national consultation:

Feedback and confirmation of province, sectors

Consultation meeting technical level, policy maker level

Report and submit to the governmnent

-

Start:6/2/2011 – finish: 25/5/2011 Data colection:- 2Œ4 weeks /1 -

district.Ban

DATA of Evaluation (survey) :

Total Population:1.053.337 families-,

8.654 Ban

143 -Districts, 16 provinces & 1

capital

-Time of Monitoring and Evaluation

Out Put of the evaluation

For Development Developed families 494,825 46.98% Developed villages 883 10.20% Developed koumbans 11 1.00%

For Poverty Poor families 198,678 18.86% Poor villages 3,175 36.69%

Poor districts ( 285/PM) 53 36.69%

Number and Percentages of poor household in LAO PDR

104,059

53,298

42,401

Sales

Northern Part

Middle Part

Southern Part

12

21%

27%52%

Number and Percentages of poor Village in LAO PDR

2013

684519

Northern PartMiddle PartSouthern Part

13

16%

21%63%

Poor Village 5- criteria

1. Poverty rate : 51% households 2.254 26.05 %

2. No primary school,

>1walking-hour -nearest school 143 1.65 %

3. No health care net

>two walking- hours to the nearest 462 5.34%

4. No clean water available. 991 11.45%

5. No all weather road access 2.114 24.43%

Number of developed and undeveloped village in LAO PDR (by 285 Result)

Poor house-

holds≥51%

No primary school

No health care net

No clean water available.

No all weather road access.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

6400

8511 81927663

6540

2254

143 462991

2114

percentage of poor villagepercentage of non-poor village

16

Developed village 13 -criteria:

1. Strong village leadership 3.403 39.32 %

2. All villagers develop law respect and solidarity 7.686 88.81 %

3. Certified as a Legal Case Free-Drug Free-social security 4.241 49.01 %

4. >85% certified as Developed Households. 1.683 19.45 %

5. production Collective, group, revolving fund(s). 4.521 52.24 %

6. All permanent domicile and stable living resource(s). 6.848 79.13 %

7. good urbanism plan 4.484 51.81%

8. access to all weather road 6.537 75.54 %

9. >70% enjoy main electricity consumption. 4.699 54.30 %

10. Certified as the health care model village 2.118 24.47 %

11. Certified as the completed primary education village 6.917 79.93 %

12. Certified as the cultural village 1.615 18.66%

13. office, hall, sport yard and any other basic facilities . 4.459 51.53%

Developed koumban 9 Criteria -9criteria:

1. >85% of villages certified as Developed Villages. 11 1.00 %

2. Assures Social order and security. 975 88.88 %

3. good urbanism plan and develops accordingly . 59554.24 %

4. a permanent market. 364 33.18 %

5. a post office or a telecommunication network. 75969.19 %

6. a technical center 26824.43 %

7. a health center 837 76.30 %

8. a secondary school 828 75.48 %

9. a kumban’s office, a hall, basic facilities. 62957.34 %

Direction of 5 year RDPE

To improve livelihood of the People in the Rural areas :

To Ensure political stable , Develop Socio- Economic , Defense and ensure the social, Protect environment, Address Human resources Development

focus on household, village are priorities for poverty reduction

To promote Goods product , Improve SME and other 21

22

Target (2011-2015)- Decrease H/C Poverty rate: < 19% of Pop

- Decrease H/H Poverty rate: < 10 % of H/H

- Decrease poor Village from 3.175 villages (36,69%)

decrease to 960 villages (11%)

- Building developed village on over half of total villages

-Building big Village to be small District in rural(1-2 village/district)In 64 focal Area, in this10 of Gov’s and 54 of local authorities

- Achieving the MDGs target.

Programs for Implementing of 5 year RDPE

Encouraging people’s ownership and

Ensuring social security and order Income Generate to poor household

Program Infrastructures Develop Program socio services Develop Program Capacity building to local/ authority staffs Cooperation Program

23

5-Year Budget to be needed

Local demand (authorities suggest):

7.387,71 Billion , 4.817 projects

( 1.477,54 Bil per year) GV define: 2.800 Billion ( 560 Bil per year)

8,67 Bil 1 kumban/ year

Sources: - Domestic fund

- Foreign fund

- other fund24

Target (2011-2012)

- Decrease H/C Poverty rate: < 19 % of Pop

- Decrease H/H Poverty rate:< 17 % of H/H

- Building developed village: > 15% of Total

villages.

- To address and develop 64 focal Areas for strong infrastructure and and socio services become to new districts in 2015

25

Main Priorities plan Activities(2011-2012)

To instruct and coordinate with the line ministries and local authorities translate the IX conference resolution of party

To improve structure organization for rural development and poverty eradication

To instruct and coordinate the line ministries and local authorities in implementing of the projects

26

Main Priorities plan Activities(2011-2012) con’t

To build capacity building to staffs working in rural areas

To cooperate, share and mobilize fund for rural development and poverty eradication

To provide and attend the conference, meeting with other country

To coordinate with relevant the line ministries and local authorities

27

28

Thanks for your kind attention