27
Mahmood Shafiee Lecturer in Engineering Risk, Reliability & Maintenance Cranfield University, UK [email protected] EERA DeepWind'2016, 13th Deep Sea Offshore Wind R&D Conference 1

Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Mahmood ShafieeLecturer in Engineering Risk, Reliability & Maintenance

Cranfield University, [email protected]

EERA DeepWind'2016, 13th Deep Sea Offshore

Wind R&D Conference

1

Page 2: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Motivation of research

Risk-Based Inspection (RBI)

RBI Planning

Methodology

Presentation outline

Conclusion

M Shafiee 2

Conclusion

Testing the

Model

Wind Jacket

Foundations

Page 3: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

M Shafiee

NREL , EWEAOffshore wind energy hasexperienced an exponential growthworldwide over the past decade

The installed offshore wind energycapacity continues to rise

2004: 622 MW 2014: 8 GW (annualgrowth rate of around %30)

3

Motivation

Cumulative installed capacity of offshore wind power in the European Union (EU)

Page 4: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

M Shafiee 4

Cost reduction is of increasingimportance for all offshore windenergy players

• To make the electricity generated byoffshore wind turbines more price-competitive

The cost per kilowatt hour ofelectricity generated by offshore windturbines is approximately 22 cents,but it should reduce to 7 ȼ/kwh by2030

Motivation

22 ȼ/kwh 7 ȼ/kwh ?

Page 5: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

M Shafiee 5

Motivation

operation and maintenance (O&M) costsaccount for about 25 to 40% of the overallenergy generation cost

A significant portion of annual maintenancebudget is wasted due to insufficient orinefficient maintenance activities

• One of the most effective ways to minimizethe inspection & repair costs is to apply risk-based inspection methods and tools

Cost drivers of a typical 5MW offshore wind turbine

Page 6: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

M Shafiee

• Risk-based Inspection technique has been appliedto a wide range of industries

• Many institutes and organizations (like HSE, API,DNVGL, ABB, TWI) have developed risk-basedinspection solutions for different structures by takinginto account the regulatory requirements andguidelines (e.g. API RP 580 ; DNVGL-RP-C210)

• The main aim of RBI tool is to achieve safeoperating conditions at minimum inspection cost,and protect human life and the environment fromany possible damage during operation

6

Risk-Based Inspection (RBI)

Page 7: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Risk

Likelihood (Probability) of failure

Magnitude (Severity) of failure

Risk is a combination oflikelihood and magnitude

Risk-Based Inspection (RBI)

How could risk assessment informationbe used in making more cost-effectiveinspection decisions?

Is this cost-effective to choose sameinspection strategy for high / medium /low risk assets?

M Shafiee

Page 8: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

8

• RBI is a technique which prioritises inspection tasks according to theinformation provided by risk assessment procedure

• RBI is a technique which determines the frequency of inspection fordifferent assets based on their criticality levels

• RBI is a technique which assists inspectors to find the mostappropriate inspection method for assets

Risk-Based Inspection (RBI)

Page 9: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

9

IDENTIFY THREATS/

HAZARDS

to EQUIPMENT

(Pipework, Vessels etc)

SUSCEPTIBILITY to

THREAT

MITIGATION

MEASURES to

REDUCE

SUSCEPTIBILITY

LIKELIHOOD of

FAILURE

FAILURE MODE

CONSEQUENCES of

FAILURE

ASSESS

INSPECTION

HISTORY

REMAINING LIFE or

INSPECTION GRADE

IDENTIFY THREATS/

HAZARDS

to EQUIPMENT

(Pipework, Vessels etc)

SUSCEPTIBILITY to

THREAT

MITIGATION

MEASURES to

REDUCE

SUSCEPTIBILITY

LIKELIHOOD of

FAILURE

FAILURE MODE

CONSEQUENCES of

FAILURE

ASSESS

INSPECTION

HISTORY

REMAINING LIFE or

INSPECTION GRADERISK FACTOR

INSPECTION

SCHEMERef: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA.

API RP 580 Methodology

M Shafiee

There are several RBI methodologiesavailable in energy industries

Topside facilitiesOnshore TerminalsSubsea Pipeline

The larger the risk level, the more the focus on inspection

Page 10: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

10

RBI Applications to Wind Energy Structures

RBI policy for an offshore wind turbine consisting of a single critical component

RBI for offshore windturbines based onAPI methodology inoil and gas

2008 2009

Bayesian decisionmodel to optimizerisk-based planning ofinspection for offshorewind turbines

2012risk-based approachto asset integritymanagement ofoffshore windturbines

2011

To the best of authors’ knowledge, there have been few attempts made byresearchers on developing RBI optimization methodologies for offshore windjacket structures

M Shafiee

Page 11: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

• Jacket structures are one of themost common fixed structures usedin the offshore oil and gas and windenergy industries. The number ofinstallations is steadily increasingevery year as the offshore energymarket continues to rise

• A jacket support structure is awelded tubular space frameconsisting of three or more near-vertical legs supported by a lateralbracing system

Offshore Wind Jacket Structures

M Shafiee

Page 12: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Wind turbine substructures (jackets)

• The function of a jacket structure is to support the topside facilities or wind turbines and toserve as a template for the foundation system. These structures can transfer the loads fromthe topside to the seabed through the driven piles

• The offshore jacket structures should be designed with sufficient strength and stiffness towithstand the wind and wave forces, forces due to current acting on the sea, tides,temperature forces, ice forces, earthquakes, etc.

Offshore Wind Jacket Structures

M Shafiee

Page 13: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

To review the RBI methodologies available in the Offshore Wind Energyindustries

To propose a generic RBI framework to apply to Offshore WindFoundations

To propose an Analytical framework to compare RBI performance withcurrently used constant-interval inspections

To test and validate the proposed model on various foundationtopologies

M Shafiee 13

Aims and Objectives

Page 14: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

A generic RBI planning methodology for Offshore Wind Jacket StructuresM Shafiee

Page 15: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

1

23

5

4

RBI MethodologyThe condition assessment data (e.g.,sea-state data, deterioration modesand causes, damage propagation,etc.) are collected from differentcondition monitoring solutions

Different damage mechanismsare identified and the associatedroot causes are investigated

The risk of potential damage tofoundation is evaluated by combiningthe likelihood of structural damageand the magnitude of consequences

The level of risk of failure forwind foundations is used toschedule appropriate inspectionand preventative repair tasksM Shafiee

Page 16: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Dr. Mahmood Shafiee

RBI MethodologyData collection & review

Collect data and populate the RBI document to include:

• Technical Specification – Type of Jacket, Design codes, etc.

• Operating Conditions – Temperature, pressure, weather conditions

• Construction – Material Specification, Thickness, Corrosion Allowance.

• Inspection History – Previous Reports, Repairs, Modifications.

Discussion and review of the data to agree, add and amend as necessary to form anaccurate record of the jacket condition and operating parameters

Page 17: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Dr. Mahmood Shafiee

RBI MethodologyIdentification of Damage Mechanisms and Root Causes

Page 18: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Dr. Mahmood Shafiee

RBI MethodologyRisk (Or PoF) Analysis

Page 19: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

0)(

0)(

0

taTTP

tAaPtTP

crG

crf

Time of

failure

Time for

crack growth

to critical depth

Time for

crack

initiation

Critical

crack

depth

Crack depth

at time t

Specified

time

0T

cra

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0

Service time (yr)

Lo

g(P

rob

. fa

ilu

re)

No insp.

Insp.at 4.5

Insp.at 9.2

Insp.at 13.4

Target

RBI MethodologyRisk (Or PoF) Analysis

Page 20: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Dr. Mahmood Shafiee

RBI MethodologyFailure Cost Analysis

Three cost factors are considered for this purpose:

CI: cost of inspection

CR: cost of imperfect repair

CF: cost of failure

CT = Σ[CI(t) + CR(t) + CF(t)] × (1+r)t

Page 21: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

Dr. Mahmood Shafiee

RBI MethodologyOptimal Inspection Planning

Determine an Optimum Inspection Plan:

Min CT

S.t. R ≥ R0

• Focus effort on high risk assets

• Choose appropriate inspection techniques for each identified deteriorationmechanism

• Identify appropriate periodicities

• Consider ways to reduce risk (Inspection does not reduce consequence!)

Page 22: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

22M Shafiee

Application

The proposed RBI planning methodology is being applied to two welded

tubular joints of a steel jacket structure

Page 23: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

23

Likelihood of failure for

joint 9 using MCS technique

Inspection plan on the basis

of likelihood of failure

Page 24: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

24

Page 25: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

25

Page 26: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

26

The existing RBI methodologies in the wind energy industry werereviewed

A generic RBI methodology for offshore wind jacket structures wasproposed

The performance of the proposed RBI methodology (in terms of cost) wascompared with constant-interval inspections suggested by API

Conclusion

Page 27: Mahmood Shafiee - SINTEF · 2016. 1. 26. · Ref: API RP 580 (2002) Risk Based Inspection (RBI). First Edition, American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, USA. API RP 580 Methodology

27

Thank you for your attention

&

welcome your questions!

Mahmood Shafiee

[email protected]