8
MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component Name : Bearing Housing Grade : GJS 450

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTIONComparison between simulation and actualComponent Name : Bearing HousingGrade : GJS 450

Page 2: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

ACTUAL SIMULATION

Pr. Time 10 -12 sec

Pr. Temp 1378 deg c

Sand Temp 35 - 36 deg C

Pr. Time 11 sec

Pr. Temp 1380 deg c

Sand Temp 35 deg C

C - 3.586% Si - 2.77% Mn - 0.273%S - 0.006%P - 0.02%Cu - 0.013% Mg - 0.039% Cr - 0.023%

CHEMISTRY

Page 3: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

ACTUAL SIMULATIONTensile Bar1:-08 M2 L10B - 431.18 N/Sq.mm08 M2 L13A - 467.04 N/Sq.mmTensile Bar2:-08 M2 L10B - 441.18 N/Sq.mm08 M2 L13A - 472.08 N/Sq.mm

461 N/Sq.mm

TENSILE STRENGTH

Page 4: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

ACTUAL SIMULATION

Tensile Bar1:-08 M2 L10B - 21.93%08 M2 L13A - 17.22%Tensile Bar2:-08 M2 L10B - 21.09%08 M2 L13A - 15.88%

ELONGATION

15 to 18.24%

Page 5: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

ACTUAL SIMULATION

08 M2 L10B - 156 BHN08 M2 L13A - 163 BHN

HARDNESS

155.4 to 168.2 BHN

Page 6: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

ACTUAL SIMULATION

08 M2 L10B - 95%08 M2 L13A - 90%

FERRITE

94%

Page 7: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

ACTUAL SIMULATION

08 M2 L10B - 5%08 M2 L13A - 10%

PEARLITE

6.35 to 12.7%

Page 8: MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d METALLURGICAL PROPERTIES PREDICTION Comparison between simulation and actual Component

MAGNA M a g n a D i g i t e c h I n d i a P r i v a t e L i m i t e d

Findings and conclusion

1. Mechanical properties of this grade matches with actual component properties