Upload
kendra
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Magmatism on Super-Earths: What do we expect to see?. Edwin Kite & Michael Manga (UC Berkeley) Eric Gaidos (U. Hawaii). Queloz et al., A&A, 2009. exoplanet.eu, 12/2/2009. Radiogenic heating , stellar insolation, and tidal forcing. Radiogenic heating dominates:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Magmatism on Super-Earths: What do we expect to see?
Edwin Kite & Michael Manga (UC Berkeley) Eric Gaidos (U. Hawaii)
exoplanet.eu, 12/2/2009
Queloz et al., A&A, 2009
Radiogenic heating , stellar insolation, and tidal forcing
Radiogenic heating dominates:
How does melt flux vary with time and planet mass? Is plate tectonics possible on Super-Earths? What is the role of galactic cosmochemical evolution? What is the role of oceans?
Kite, Manga & Gaidos, Astrophysical Journal, 2009Valencia & O’Connell, EPSL, 2009
Papuc & Davies, Icarus, 2008
Thermal model
Melting model
Parameterized convectionModels tuned to reproduce 7kmthick oceanic crust on today’sEarth
Tν = 43K
Assumptions: Melting with small residual porosity, melts separate quickly, and suffer relatively little re-equilibration during ascent.
.X(T,P) from:McKenzie & Bickle, 1988Katz et al., 2003pMELTS (Asimow et al.,2001)
Competing effects of greater planet mass
ΔT
P/ρgk(Tp – Ts)/Q
Mantle parcel ascendingbeneath stagnant lid
Mantle parcel ascendingbeneath mid-oceanridge
Melt fraction
Plate tectonics
Stagnantlid
Results: Plate tectonics versus stagnant lid
PLATES
STAGNANTLID
Katz et al., 2003productivity model
Kite, Manga & Gaidos, ApJ, 2009
Is plate tectonics possible?Valencia & O’Connell (EPSL, 2009) show that faster plate velocities on super-Earths don’tlead to buoyant plates - provided that Tc < 0.16 Tl at the subduction zone.
We find that this limit is comfortablyexceeded, and plates arepositively buoyant at the subductionzone when M ≥ 10 Mearth
Differing results related tochoice of tν.
Galactic cosmochemical evolution
Time after galaxy formation (Gyr)Time after galaxy formation (Gyr)
[X]/
[Si],
nor
mal
ized
to E
arth
10
1
Eu is a spectroscopic proxy for r –process elements such as U & Th. Eu/Si trends indicate that the young Galaxy is Si – poor.
Effects on present-day conditions:Including cosmochemical trends in [U] and [Th] lowers mantle temperature (Tm) by up to 50 K for young planets, while raising Tm by up to 40 K for old stars, compared to their present-day temperature had they formed with an Earthlike inventory of radiogenic elements.
Acts to reduce the effect of aging.
Effec
t of o
cean
s
Kite, Manga & Gaidos, Astrophysical Journal, 2009;Ocean and planet masses (black dots) from accretion simulations of Raymond et al., Icarus, 2006
Stellar heating dominates:
Knutson et al., Nature, 2007
HD 189733b(1.13 MJup)
http
://w
ww
.jach
.haw
aii.e
duE
SO
(ar
tist’s
impr
essi
on)
Detectability of ponds with isothermal surface temperature
Tem
perature
Tem
perature
Tem
perature
Atmospheres have wavelength-dependent phase curve shapeMagma ponds have wavelength-independent phase curve shape
Tidal heating dominates:Barnes et al., ApJL, 2009
Tidal habitable zoneInsolation habitable zoneCombined habitable zone
Minimum heating: 0.04 W/m2
Maximum heating: 2 W/m2 (Io)
Barnes et al., ApJL, 2009
Q’ is fixed (500).
Open question: Can tidal heating initiate a runaway greenhouse?
Hemming et al., ApJ, 2009
Summary
Minor effect of planet mass on crustal thickness Provided plate tectonics operates; buoyancy may be a problem
Galactic cosmochemical evolution probably less important
Si accumulates over galactic evolution, U & Th reach steady state
Massive oceans suppress volcanism Important, e.g., for migrating planets (“ocean planets”)
Magma ponds may be probe of composition Not known if ponds are close to isothermal Stable to TPW?
Tidal heating can drive geodynamics and perhaps climate
See recent Henning et al. paper on arxiv
Backup slides (removed from online version)