27
KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS TOWARDS ANTI-CORRUPTION Thesis submitted to Madurai Kamaraj University in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN JOURNALISM AND MASS COMMUNICATION By DEBENDRA P. MAJHI (Reg. No.P4621) GUIDE Co-GUIDE Dr. S. JENEFA Dr. A. MUTHUMANICKAM Head & Chairperson Dean, Faculty of Humanities and Languages Department of Journalism & Professor & Head Mass Communication Department of Education Madurai Kamaraj University Madurai Kamaraj University DEPARTMENT JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY MADURAI – 625 021. AUGUST – 2019

MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY P.MAJHI... · 2020. 7. 13. · DEBENDRA P. MAJHI (Reg. No.P4621) GUIDE Co-GUIDE Dr. S. JENEFA Dr. A. MUTHUMANICKAM Head & Chairperson Dean, Faculty of Humanities

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF THE HIGHER

    EDUCATION STUDENTS TOWARDS ANTI-CORRUPTION

    Thesis submitted to Madurai Kamaraj University

    in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the

    award of the degree of

    DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN JOURNALISM AND MASS COMMUNICATION

    By

    DEBENDRA P. MAJHI

    (Reg. No.P4621)

    GUIDE Co-GUIDE

    Dr. S. JENEFA Dr. A. MUTHUMANICKAM Head & Chairperson Dean, Faculty of Humanities and Languages Department of Journalism & Professor & Head Mass Communication Department of Education Madurai Kamaraj University Madurai Kamaraj University

    DEPARTMENT JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION

    MADURAI KAMARAJ UNIVERSITY

    MADURAI – 625 021.

    AUGUST – 2019

  • 1

    KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE OF THE HIGHER

    EDUCATION STUDENTS TOWARDS ANTI-CORRUPTION

    SYNOPSIS

    NEED FOR THE STUDY

    Education develops our personality, shapes our character. It makes

    us mannered and cultured. It expands the intellect of mind. It helps us to

    stand on our own feet. It develops a feeling of self-reliance and self-

    confidence. It inculcates the quality of leadership. It makes us gregarious

    and co-operative. It promotes team spirit. It generates patience and leads

    us to perfection. It controls our mind and heart leading to overall self-

    control. It takes us from dark to light, from untruth to truth and from wrong

    to right. It is the cornerstone of democracy and the soul of an egalitarian

    society. Further, it motivates the right kind of attitudes and values in the

    individuals to fulfill their social obligations.

    Any observable and measurable incidence has direct bearing

    with the complex cognitive process of understanding, reasoning,

    perception building and the process of knowledge acquisition. The

    incremental development of the process forms the psychology of meta-

    epistemology. Therefore, knowledge is used in everyday activities through

    inference of facts determined by experimentations. The situated

    knowledge is, in contrast, is specific to a particular situation or context.

  • 2

    Knowledge formed through such means and the attitude developed in the

    process is manifested in practice due to such situational knowledge.

    Understanding and critically thinking about the attitude and situational

    knowledge of the students in the learning and practicing framework can

    reveal manifestations of such situational knowledge in the actual activities.

    Corruption is considered a major disadvantage to development.

    Corruption generally means a misuse of public office for personal gain.

    Corruption is a misconduct and is one form of social ills. In fact corruption

    has to do with matters of morality, rudeness and circumstances, positions

    in government agencies or apparatuses, abuses of power in office for

    granting, economic and political factors, and the placement of families or

    classes into official service under the authority his position. Institutions also

    have a strong impact and impact on the development process, as well as

    affecting economic growth. Various institutions such as law, media,

    corruption control and effective government are the prerequisites for

    developing the economy. So the weakness of the law and inconsistent in

    committing to lead to poor institutions and corruption. Yet an active society

    can seek to protest the abuse of corrupt power. To reduce the level of

    corruption, the government has made a lot of effort by developing

    regulations such as government institutions.

  • 3

    In the recent past, anti-corruption initiatives have broadened to

    directly involve the private sector, which plays a central role in the supply

    of corruption; and civil society, because of the importance of

    whistleblowing in exposing this largely covert phenomenon.

    The role of education and academia in the fight against corruption is

    multidimensional. The academic community, being the best informed and

    well perceived lot, has academic as well as societal duty to assimilate,

    disseminate, share, inform and educate the society through their day to

    day interaction. Teachers and students are the role models and the society

    look upon them with trust and respect. The academic community should

    avail this opportunity for the above mentioned purpose. They prescribe

    curriculum, set teaching-learning pedagogy, device co-curricular activities

    and take affirmative actions in the field of education which is the perfect

    breeding ground to create an anticorruption perspective in the minds of the

    participating students community. Instead of confinement within that

    particular community, such perspectives are transmitted to their peer

    groups and neighborhoods resulting an anticorruption mood and

    atmosphere in the society. Public education and creation of awareness is

    one of the pivotal tools that may be part of most powerful anti-corruption

    strategies attempting to establish new institutions and measures relying on

    public trust and inputs. Access to information and dissemination of the

  • 4

    same through education and awareness training is therefore a powerful

    tool to mobilize civil society through public education.

    The issue of fight against corruption has become center stage which

    the teacher unions have increasingly started addressing these days. The

    main agenda is how to fight corruption in education and how to equip the

    students through education to fight against corruption in and outside the

    fields of education. Many teacher organisations make different in-service

    programmes available for their members. Some of these programmes are

    on trade union matters and others on professional issues. Issues to

    address corruption through education could be integrated in both these

    types of programmes. There are also other ways in which teacher

    organisations can deal with these issues. Many organisations have, in

    recent years, been involved in discussions on professional standards and

    professional ethics. Fighting corruption is certainly a part of that

    discussion. It is important for teacher organisations to explore different

    types of actions, given as under, which can be taken in order to fight

    corruption (“The global programme against corruption”, (2004, UN Anti-

    Corruption Tool Kit).

    (i) Promoting professional ethics;

    (ii) Organizing and supporting training activities; and

    (iii) Pressing for the inclusion of anti-corruption education in the

    curriculum.

  • 5

    In this context, higher education institutions can play a major role in

    fighting corruption, both in their capacity as institutions of higher education

    that touch the lives of future leaders and as large organizations with

    substantial economic footprints. . In this context the researcher wants to

    know the level of knowledge, attitude and practice about anti-corruption.

    Hence the need for the present study which is entitled “Knowledge,

    Attitude and Practice of the Higher Education Students towards

    Anti-Corruption”

    BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

    Globally, the World Economic Forum has estimated that the cost of

    corruption is about US$2.6 trillion a year. The impacts of corruption

    disproportionately affect the most vulnerable people in society.

    Widespread corruption deters investment, weakens economic growth and

    undermines the rule of law.

    Corruption has traditionally been treated as a legal issue and

    consequently as a problem for the public sector to solve through law

    making and law enforcement. This approach has failed. It has proved both

    ineffective, because public officials are typically on the receiving end of

    corruption and therefore less likely to effectively oppose it the more corrupt

    the country is; and inadequate, because corruption doesn‟t boil down to

    law enforcement, but profoundly undermines economic and human

    development. The present researcher has been working in the Central

  • 6

    Government office for the last two decades. As a citizen of India, the

    researcher wants to know the level of knowledge, attitude and practice

    about anti-corruption among the higher education students, particularly.

    Hence the need for the present study, which is entitled “Knowledge,

    Attitude and Practice of the Higher Education Students towards

    Anti-Corruption”

    TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

    Knowledge on Anti-

    corruption

    : refers to the facts, information, and skills

    acquired through experience or

    education on anti-corruption among the

    higher education students.

    Attitude towards Anti-

    corruption

    : refers to mental disposition of positive or

    negative opinion towards anti-corruption

    among the higher education students

    Practice towards Anti-

    corruption

    : refers to the getting opinion towards anti-

    corruption on the basis of given life

    oriented situations among the higher

    education students

    Higher Education

    Students

    : refer to those who are studying UG/PG

    programmes in Arts and Science

    Colleges in Madurai District affiliated to

    Madurai Kamaraj University.

  • 7

    VARIABLES OF THE STUDY

    The study has been designed with the following variables:

    Dependent Variables

    Knowledge on anti-corruption

    Attitude towards anti-corruption

    Practice towards anti-corruption

    Independent Variables

    1. Gender : Male / Female

    2. Types of Institution : Autonomous / Non-autonomous

    3. Course of study : UG Degree / PG Degree

    4. Subject of study : Arts Group / Science Group

    5. Institution locality : Rural / Urban

    6. Institution Type : Government & Aided / Private

    7. Institution kind : Unisex colleges / Mixed colleges

    8. Type of Family : Nuclear family / Joint family

    9. Nativity of the student : Rural / Urban

    10. Volunteers in NCC/NSS : Yes / No

    11. Participation in social

    Awareness Programme : Yes / No

    12. Participation in relief

    Activities during Natural disaster : Yes / No

    13. Membership in Political Parties : Yes / No

  • 8

    OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

    The specific objectives of the present study are as follows:

    1. To construct and standardize a scale on Knowledge on Anti-

    corruption among higher education students.

    2. To measure the level of Knowledge on Anti-corruption among

    higher education students.

    3. To find out whether there is a significant difference in

    Knowledge on anti-corruption in terms of select independent

    variables among higher education students.

    4. To construct and standardize a scale on Attitude towards Anti-

    corruption among higher education students.

    5. To measure the level of Attitude towards Anti-corruption

    among higher education students.

    6. To find out whether there is a significant difference in Attitude

    towards anti-corruption in terms of select independent

    variables among higher education students.

    7. To construct and standardize a scale on Practice towards

    Anti-corruption among higher education students.

    8. To measure the level of Practice towards Anti-corruption

    among higher education students.

  • 9

    9. To find out whether there is a significant difference in Practice

    towards anti-corruption in terms of select independent

    variables among higher education students.

    10. To find out the relationship between Knowledge on anti-

    corruption, attitude towards anti-corruption and practice

    towards anti-corruption among higher education students.

    HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY

    The following hypotheses were formulated for the present study:

    1. Higher education students possess average level of

    Knowledge on anti-corruption.

    2. Each of the independent variables exerts a significant

    influence on Knowledge on anti-corruption among higher

    education students.

    3. Higher education students possess average level of attitude

    towards anti-corruption.

    4. Each of the independent variables exerts a significant

    influence on attitude towards anti-corruption among higher

    education students.

    5. Higher education students possess average level of practice

    towards anti-corruption.

  • 10

    6. Each of the independent variables exerts a significant

    influence on practice towards anti-corruption among higher

    education students.

    7. There is a significant positive relationship between Knowledge

    on anti-corruption, attitude towards anti-corruption and

    practice towards anti-corruption among higher education

    students.

    METHODOLOGY- IN -BRIEF

    Design : Descriptive

    Method : Normative

    Technique : Survey

    Sample

    A stratified representative sample of 1360 higher education students

    who are studying UG/PG in Arts and Science Colleges in Madurai District.

    Tools

    1) Scale on Knowledge on Anti-corruption constructed and

    Standardized by Debendra P.Majhi and Jenefa, S &

    Muthumanickam, A. (2018).

    2) Scale on Attitude towards Anti-corruption constructed and

    standardized by Debendra P.Majhi and Jenefa, S &

    Muthumanickam, A. (2018).

  • 11

    3) Inventory on Practice towards Anti-corruption constructed and

    Standardized by Debendra P.Majhi and Jenefa, S &

    Muthumanickam, A. (2018).

    4) General Information Schedule.

    Statistical treatments

    The statistical treatments employed in the study are listed below.

    a) Test of significance of difference between the means of large

    independent samples („t‟-test).

    b) Pearson‟s Product Moment correlation („r‟)

    DELIMITATION AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY

    There may be more number of variables influencing the knowledge,

    attitude and practice towards anti-corruption among higher education

    students. But only thirteen variables are taken for the present study. This is

    delimitation of the present study.

    The population of the present study is Higher education students.

    Since higher education students of Madurai District could be considered

    as a mini replica of the State of Tamil Nadu in terms of socio-economic-

    cultural and educational contexts. Hence the researcher selected only

    fifteen Arts & Science Colleges in Madurai District affiliated to Madurai

    Kamaraj University. There are other college students like Engineering,

  • 12

    Medical, Law, Colleges of Education etc. This is yet another delimitation of

    the present study

    It is expected that the present study would throw light on the

    knowledge, attitude and practice towards anti-corruption among the higher

    education students and also would be enlighten the future research

    scholars to carry out more studies in this area.

    The next chapter deals with the Review of Related Literature.

    HYPOTHESES VERIFICATION

    1. Higher education students possess average level of Knowledge

    on anti-corruption.

    The empirical average score of Knowledge on anti-corruption among

    higher education students is found to be 11.80, while the theoretical

    average is 12. This shows that Knowledge on anti-corruption among higher

    education students is below the average level. In other way it may stated

    that the higher education students do not have adequate knowledge on

    anti-corruption.

    Hence Hypothesis is Rejected.

    2. Each of the independent variables exerts a significant influence

    on Knowledge on anti-corruption among higher education

    students.

  • 13

    Out of 13 variables involved in this study, 11 variables exert a

    significant influence on Knowledge on anti-corruption among higher

    education students.

    Hence Hypothesis is Substantially Accepted.

    3. Higher education students possess average level of attitude

    towards anti-corruption.

    The empirical average score of attitude towards anti-corruption

    among higher education students is found to be 50.90, while the

    theoretical average is 48. This shows that attitude towards anti-

    corruption among higher education students is above the average level.

    It may be stated that the higher education students have positive

    attitude towards anti-corruption.

    Hence Hypothesis is Accepted

    4. Each of the independent variables exerts a significant influence

    on attitude towards anti-corruption among higher education

    students.

    Out of 13 variables involved in this study, 11 variables exerts

    a significant influence on Attitude towards anti-corruption among

    higher education students.

    Hence Hypothesis is Substantially Accepted

  • 14

    5. Higher education students possess average level of practice

    towards anti-corruption.

    The empirical average score of practice towards anti-corruption

    among higher education students is found to be 20.37, while the

    theoretical average is 24. This shows that practice towards anti-

    corruption among higher education students is below the average level.

    In other words it may be stated that higher education students have

    less level of practice towards anti-corruption.

    Hence Hypothesis is Rejected.

    6. Each of the independent variables exerts a significant influence

    on practice towards anti-corruption among higher education

    students.

    Out of 13 variables involved in this study, 11 variables exert a

    significant influence on practice towards anti-corruption among

    higher education students.

    Hence Hypothesis is Substantially Accepted

    7. There is a significant positive relationship between Knowledge

    on anti-corruption, attitude towards anti-corruption and

    Practice towards anti-corruption among higher education

    students.

    All the correlation values (r) between knowledge, attitude and

    practice towards anti-corruption among college students are found to be

  • 15

    higher than the table value 0.027 at 0.05 level. Hence there is a

    significant positive relationship between knowledge, attitude and

    practice towards anti-corruption among college students.

    Hence Hypothesis is Accepted

    CONCLUSION

    The specific conclusions emerged out the present investigations

    are as follows:

    1. Higher education students possess below the average level of

    Knowledge on anti-corruption. In other way it may stated that the

    higher education students do not have adequate knowledge on anti-

    corruption.

    2. Knowledge on anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found dependent on

    i. Gender

    ii. Types of Institution

    iii. Course of study

    iv. Subject of study

    v. Institution locality

    vi. Institution type

    vii. Institution kind

    viii. Type of family

    ix. Nativity of the students

  • 16

    x. Volunteers in NCC/NSS

    xi. Participation in relief activities during natural disaster

    3. Knowledge on anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found independent of

    i. Participation in social awareness programme

    ii. Membership in Political Parties

    4. Knowledge on anti-corruption is found higher among the students

    i. who are male than female

    ii. who are studying autonomous college than non-

    autonomous colleges

    iii. who are studying PG course than UG course

    iv. who are studying science group than arts group

    v. who are studying in rural colleges than urban colleges

    vi. who are studying private colleges than government /

    government Aided colleges

    vii. who are studying in unisex type colleges than mixed

    type colleges

    viii. who belong to joint family than nuclear family

    ix. who belong to rural area than urban area

    x. who have volunteers in NCC/NSS than others

    xi. who have participate in relief activities during natural

    disaster than others

  • 17

    5. Higher education students possess above the average level of

    Attitude towards anti-corruption. It may be stated that the higher

    education students have positive attitude towards anti-corruption.

    6. Attitude towards anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found dependent on

    i. Gender

    ii. Types of Institution

    iii. Course of study

    iv. Subject of study

    v. Institution locality

    vi. Institution type

    vii. Institution kind

    viii. Types of family

    ix. Nativity of the student

    x. Volunteers in NCC/NSS

    xi. Participation in relief activities during natural disaster

    7. Attitude towards anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found independent of

    i. Participation in social awareness programme

    ii. Membership in political parties

    8. Attitude towards anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found higher among

  • 18

    i. who are male than female

    ii. who are studying in autonomous college than non-

    autonomous colleges

    iii. who are studying in PG course than UG course

    iv. who are studying Science group than Arts group

    v. who are studying in Rural colleges than Urban colleges

    vi. who are studying in government & government aided

    colleges than private colleges

    vii. who are studying in unisex type colleges than mixed

    type colleges

    viii. who belong to joint family than nuclear family

    ix. who belong to urban area than rural area

    x. who are volunteers in NCC/NSS than others

    xi. who have participate in relief activities during natural

    disaster

    9. Higher education students possess below the average level of

    practice about anti-corruption In other words it may be stated that

    higher education students have less level of practice towards anti-

    corruption.

    10. Practice about anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found dependent on

    i. Gender

  • 19

    ii. Types of Institution

    iii. Course of study

    iv. Subject of study

    v. Institution locality

    vi. Institution Type

    vii. Institution kind

    viii. Type of family

    ix. Nativity of the students

    x. Volunteers in NCC/NSS

    xi. Participation in relief Activities during Natural disaster

    11. Practice about anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found independent of

    i. Participation in social Awareness Programme

    ii. Membership in Political Parties

    12. Practice about anti-corruption among higher education students is

    found higher among

    i. who are male than female

    ii. who are studying in autonomous college than non-

    autonomous colleges

    iii. who are studying in PG course than UG course

    iv. who are studying Science group than Arts group

    v. who are studying in Rural colleges than Urban colleges

  • 20

    vi. who are studying in private colleges than government and

    government aided colleges

    vii. who are studying in unisex colleges than mixed type

    colleges

    viii. who belong to joint family than nuclear family

    ix. who belong to urban area than rural area

    x. who are volunteers in NCC/NSS than others

    xi. who have participate in relief activities during natural

    disaster than others

    EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS

    Higher education male students have more knowledge on anti-

    corruption, having positive attitude towards anti-corruption and having

    more practices towards anti-corruption than female students.

    Autonomous college students have more knowledge on anti-

    corruption, having positive attitude towards anti-corruption and having

    more practices towards anti-corruption than non-autonomous college

    students.

    PG course students have more knowledge on anti-corruption, having

    positive attitude towards anti-corruption and having more practices towards

    anti-corruption than UG course students.

  • 21

    Science group students have more knowledge on anti-corruption,

    having positive attitude towards anti-corruption and having more practices

    towards anti-corruption than Arts group students.

    Rural college students have more knowledge on anti-corruption,

    having positive attitude towards anti-corruption and having more practices

    towards anti-corruption than Urban college students.

    Unisex type of the college students have more knowledge on anti-

    corruption, having positive attitude towards anti-corruption and having

    more practices towards anti-corruption than mixed type of the college

    students.

    Students who belong to joint family have more knowledge on anti-

    corruption, having positive attitude towards anti-corruption and having

    more practices towards anti-corruption than the students those who

    belongs to nuclear family.

    Students who have volunteers in NCC/NSS have more knowledge

    on anti-corruption, having positive attitude towards anti-corruption and

    having more practices towards anti-corruption than the students those

    who do not have volunteers in NCC/NSS.

    Students who have participate in relief activities during natural

    disaster have more knowledge on anti-corruption, having positive attitude

  • 22

    towards anti-corruption and having more practices towards anti-corruption

    than the students who do not have participate in relief activities during

    natural disaster.

    The suggested activities may be arranged to increase knowledge on

    anti-corruption, to raise positive attitude towards anti-corruption and also to

    improve practices towards anti-corruption for the following group:

    i. Higher education female students

    ii. Non-autonomous college students

    iii. UG programme college students

    iv. Arts group of the college students

    v. Urban college students

    vi. Mixed type of the college students

    vii. Nuclear family students

    viii. The students those who have not participate in NCC/NSS

    activities

    ix. The students those who have not participate in relief activities

    in natural disaster

    The colleges and the college management councils may come

    forward to purchase more number of books on anti-corruption,

    evils on corruption etc., which may be place in the college

    libraries for students‟ reference.

  • 23

    Higher education institution may include a portion on anti-

    corruption in any one course of curriculum in UG and PG

    programme.

    A special lecture on the importance of anti-corruption may

    organize by the colleges for the benefit of the college students.

    The government organization may take necessary steps to put

    many more sign boards in their offices to avoid practices on anti-

    corruption.

    The government department may come forward to put signboards

    on anti-corruption in public sectors like bus, train, airports offices

    etc.

    The government may come forward to give advertise about

    promote practices on anti-corruption in public places like railway

    station, bus stand and other places.

    The government may come forward to make severe act and

    punishment against the persons those who practices in public

    institutions.

    Private college students have more knowledge on anti-corruption

    than government and government aided college students. At the

    same time private college students have negative attitude towards

    anti-corruption and have less practice towards anti-corruption than

    government and government aided colleges.

  • 24

    The government and Government aided colleges may take steps

    to impart more knowledge on anti-corruption for their students by the

    way of arranging special lectures, debate, essay and elocution

    competitions. At the same time the private college management

    may organize more activities (cultural programmes and

    intercollegiate competitions on anti-corruption) to enhance positive

    attitude towards anti-corruption and improve more practices towards

    anti-corruption for their day-to-day activities of the students.

    Rural nativity based college students have more knowledge on

    anti-corruption than urban nativity based college students. At the

    same time urban nativity based college students have positive

    attitude towards anti-corruption and concentrate more practices

    towards anti-corruption than rural nativity based college students.

    The higher educational institutions may organize a variety of

    programmes like group discussion forums, a special meeting on the

    importance of anti-corruption for enhancing positive attitude and

    more practices on anti-corruption among rural activity based college

    students. The government and Government aided colleges may

    provide an opportunity to enhance knowledge on anti-corruption by

    way of purchasing books on anti-corruption, highlight the importance

    for practicing anti-corruption in day-to-day life among the college

    students.

  • 25

    Group discussions, debate, essay and elocution competition

    may organize for the college students on „How to practice anti-

    corruption‟ in their regular day-to-day life of the students.

    Research funding agencies may come forward to provide

    more grants for conducting the research work on anti-

    corruption and „how to improve practices an anti-corruption.

    Press agency may come forward to high light the corruption

    practices done by the private and public sectors people.

    Media agency may come forward to conduct regular

    discussions on „how to prevent corruption practices in

    government sectors and give a wide coverage on practices

    towards anti-corruption‟.

    SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

    Following are a few areas of research related to the present

    investigations which deserve further explorations:

    • Replica of the study may be conducted with Professional College

    students

    • Replica of the study may be conducted with Teachers of School and

    Higher Education

    • Replica of the study may be conducted with School students

  • 26

    • Replica of the study may be conducted with Medical, Engineering

    and Law College students

    • Replica of the study may be conducted with administrative staff of

    school and higher education institutions

    • Replica of the study may be conducted with the staff of public and

    private service sectors.