-
Ma#as Lundberg, Senior Program Director
-
Summary • Develop success factor,
iden6fica6on of results and
understanding • Compe66on increase for
brains, programs, partners, a;rac6veness
• More & bigger networks
–knowledge triangle to be adopted
-
Why VINNOVA?
-
VINNOVA GOALS
– Growth – Knowledge, – Exper6se
– Innova6ons – New products, Service
& proceses
-
History of Strong InnovaDon and
Research Mileus in Sweden
-
From Impacts study: Summary
“CCs as instruments of innova6on
and research policy in Sweden
-‐ very posi6ve conclusions”:
-
Business development in companies
achieved combined
with high scien6fic performance
-
• A;rac6ve to Swedish industry -‐
firms have maintained their inputs;
a growing number of industrial
par6cipants
• Be;er access to academic networks
• Train PhDs who are more
quickly useful to industry
• Produce results that are more
quickly useful in R&D and
produc6on
• Be;er access to knowledge from
other companies.
-
Center of Excellence in Innovation and Research
programmes
-
The second generaDon -‐ e.g
VINN Excellence Center
• New contract “Principle agreement”
incl IPR
-
Model agreement
• Mul6-‐party nego6a6on with more than
300 000 opinions and wishes
resulted in a ”70/70-‐agreement”
-
Competence Centre Programmes
InternaDonal Examples and Influences
• Engineering Research Centres, ERC,
USA 1985 • Networks of
Centres of Excellence, Canada 1989
• CooperaDve Research Centres,
Australia 1991
In Europe (examples) • Competence
Centres, Sweden 1995 • Kplus/Comet
Competence Centres, Austria 1998/2006
• KKK Competence Centres, Hungary
2000 • Competence Centres, Estonia
2003
• Centres for Research-‐based InnovaDon,
Norway 2006
-
Needs-‐driven Basic research (Pasteur)
Applied not Scien6fically basic
research (Edison)
Yes No
Yes
No
Goal Economic or social use
Goal Scien6fic progress
Berzelii Centra
Curiosity driven Basic research (Bohr)
VINN Excellence Centers
Increased ”end” market driven /
”perfecDon”
Source Donald Stokes, Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and
Technological Innovation, Washington DC: Brookings, 1997
InsDtute Excellence Center
Industry Excellence Center
PosiDoning of competence centres is
crucial to understand the type
of impact and Dme perspecDve we
should expect
-
Impact Logic Assessment • Iden6fy
weaknesses and opportuni6es in the
innova6on system
• Develop a dis6nct impact
logic Impact
-‐1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
Program design Center duraDon
Post project period /New program
period
Anual Short term (Monitoring)
Center Impact (Evalua6on)
Long term
(Programme Impact Analysis)
Economic & other societal impact
Impact on organizaDonal level
Time (years)
Start up performance (Evalua6on)
Center Impact (Evalua6on)
– The goals select the “success”
indicators – selecDon of indicators
gives the goals
Source: VINNOVA
-
Investments in Strong R&I Milieus
Berzelii centra
Vinn Excellence
centra
Industry Excellence
centra
InsDtute Excellence
centra
Pre center investments
Sectors-‐ moDvated
centra
Vinn Growth
Research School (VINNPRO)
Strategic collaboraDon between milieus
and individual URS
qualificaDon (VINNMER)
Global links for strong research
and innovaDon milieus
Exchange/support of experiences for
leader & board members
Tiger – gender program to improve
the gender issues in strong
milieus
EvaluaDon, impact analysis and innovaDon
research
Other Vinnova-‐ program
RC
SSF
EU 7FP
Structure-‐ fund
etc
InternaDonal exchange of experiences and
benchnarking of program management
and development e.g. CREST, COMPERA
ERA NET och fd STRATA-‐MulD
ActorsMulD Purpose Programmes
Other Vinnova-‐ program
RC
SSF
EU 7FP
Structure-‐ fund
m.fl.
-
Summary • Develop success factor,
iden6fica6on of results and
understanding • Compe66on increase for
brains, programs, partners, a;rac6veness
• More & bigger networks
–knowledge triangle to be adopted
-
Thank you!
Ma#as Lundberg Ma#[email protected]
+46 8 473 31 78
