Upload
colin-quinn
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LWV UPDATE ON…
With thanks to the LWVMA Study Committee for all its efforts on this topic.
MONEY IN POLITICS
The League of Women Voters
LWV Current Position on Campaign Financing
Methods of financing political campaigns should:– Ensure the public’s right to know – Combat corruption and undue influence in the political process– Enable candidates to compete equitably– Allow maximum citizen participation in the electoral process
Most recently, using this position, the League has advocated for:– Transparency in financing political campaigns– Reducing the influence of big money in elections and government
Democracy or Plutocracy?
Fill in the blank People / Wealthy
Government of the ___________,
By the _______________,
For the ________________.
Tillman Act
(1907)
Tillman Act
(1907)
Taft Hartley (1947)
Taft Hartley (1947)
Bipartisan Campaign
Reform Act (2002)
Banned Contributions to Candidatesfrom Banks and Corporations
• Updated FECA Limits• Enhanced Soft Money Regulations
Banned Contributions to Candidates from Labor Unions
Federal Election
Campaign Act
(1971 & 1974)
• Set Limits on Contributions made to Candidates• Set Limits on Expenditures by Campaigns• Established Disclosure Laws• Created The Federal Election Commission
Free Speech v. Campaign Finance Regulations
• Who’s entitled to Free Speech Protections?
• Are Limits on Contributions and Spending Constitutional?
Defining Corruption
• Quid Pro Quo Corruption: A direct exchange of favors
• Appearance of Corruption:An implied expectation of an exchange of favors
Major Supreme Court Cases
Buckley v. Valeo - 1976– Challenged Limits on Direct Contributions to Candidates– Challenged Limits on Campaign Spending
Citizens United v. The FEC - 2010 – Challenged Limits on Independent Expenditures
McCutcheon v. The FEC - 2014– Challenged Aggregate Limits on Contributions to Candidates
and Political Organizations
Buckley v. Valeo(1976)
What It Said
• Limits on Candidate Spending Infringe on Free Speech Rights
• Limits on Contributions to Candidates are Justifiable
MONEY
IS
SPEECH!
The Bottom Line
Candidates can spend unlimited amounts of money in political campaigns to get their message to the voters
Citizens United v. The FEC (2010)
What It Said
• Free Speech rights do not depend on the identity of the speaker – whether corporate or individual
• Independent Expenditures can’t be limited as they don’t give rise to corruption
The Bottom Line
This ruling granted free speech rights to corporations and gave them the OK to spend unlimited amounts of money on “independent expenditures” to influence voters.
The Dissent
“While American democracy is imperfect, few outside the majority of this Court would have thought its flaws included a dearth of corporate money in politics.”
Justice Stevens
McCutcheon v. The FEC (2014)
What It Said
Aggregate limits on individual contributions infringe on the donors free speech rights
The Bottom Line
Donors can now give the maximum contribution to an unlimited number of candidates in federal elections, and an unlimited number of party committees.
The Dissent
Taken together, Citizens United and McCutcheon eviscerate our Nation’s campaign finance laws, leaving a remnant incapable of dealing with the problems… that those laws were intended to resolve.
Justice Breyer
American Politics is Now Open for Business
We Gladly Accept:
• Master Corps with large Treasury Funds
• American’s Expressing their views via money.
• And all Foreigners possessing the proper VISA…accounts
TillmanSpending Limits
Austin
Taft Hartley
Soft Money Loophole
Money in ElectionsHard Money Direct to Candidates• Caps on Contributions• Disclosure
Soft MoneyPolitical Parties Caps on contributions Disclosure
Super PACs• Independent Expenditures• No Caps on Contributions or
Expenditures• Reporting Requirements
Lobbyists• Fundraising• Bundling
Dark Money 501(c)(4)‘s• No Disclosure• No Cap on Contributions• Expend Only 50% On
Electioneering
The Creation of the SUPER PAC
Everyone wants to have one
In the first six months of 2015
• $258 million dollars has been raised by Super PACs backing presidential candidates, compared to 16 million raised at this point in the 2012 cycle.
• 58 people have contributed at least $1 million to these groups.
Reasons NOT to Regulate Money in Politics
• Money allows the funding of modern communications, which is essential to reach voters
• Political communications inform the voters
• Government should not regulate political speech, which is fundamental to a democracy
How Money Distorts The Political Process
• Erodes the trust of the voters
• Creates a system of favored access and donor influence on policy making
• Erodes political equality and makes it harder for candidates to compete equitably for public office
• Forces elected officials to spend too much time on campaign fundraising
What Can We Do?Enact Policies in Regard to:
• Campaign Finance Reform, including Publicly Funded Elections
• Clean Elections Reform - Disclosure and Anti-Coordination Regulations
• A Constitutional Amendment
• Voter Rights and Access
Used with permission from Steve Sack 1/28/15
What Can You Do?• VOTE in every election—local, state and national, and encourage
your friends and family to vote too
• Familiarize yourself with money in politics issues - Use the Money in Politics (MIP) Review resources on the LWVMA website (and join the Google Groups – websites on next slide)
• Get Involved – there are many grassroots orgs doing great work that could use your help; attend events, donate, volunteer
• Participate in the League’s Money in Politics Study and/or Member Consensus Group on January 21st
Come join the effort and become a member of LWV, if you are not one already!
Learn more about Money in Politics and the League Studies:• LWVMA website - https://lwvma.org/member-resources/lwvus-
constitutional-amendment-study-and-mip-review/• Google Groups - https://groups.google.com/d/forum/lwv-money-in-
politics
• Barbara Zia, SC – Chair• Peggy Appler, SC• Jeanne Brown, CA• Amy Fitzgerald, TN• Jeanne Logsdon, NM• Corlette Moore McCoy, MA• Susan Murnane, OH
• George Schumann, KY
• Lonni Skrentner, MN• Launa Zimmaro, MA• Betsy Lawson, Staff Support
LWVUS MIP Committee