LUNCH - OFCCofcc.ohio.gov/Portals/0/Documents/News-Events/OFCC Conference/2… · Cost of the Work on the basis of the CM’s Fee ... LEED Version 4 • LEED V3 Overview –Applicable

@OHFacilities / #OFCConf17

LUNCH


The State of Future Education: Preparing for Accelerating Change with Buildings that Don’t

Mark Mistur, AIA

Dean

College of Architecture and Environmental Design

Kent State University


Lane Beougher, FAIA, FCSI, NCARB, DBIA, LEED BD+C

Energy Program Manager

OFCC Update: Contracts!


Change Order Fee Allowance(August 2016)

• Agreement 2.3.1 Change Order Fee Allowancerow deleted from Additional Services table

• T&C 6.2.2 Additional Services in connection with Change Order Work paragraph deleted from Additional Services Fees section

• T&C 10.1.3 Change Order Fee Allowancedeleted from Defined Terms and Abbreviations section

4


Not Boycotting Language(May 2017)

• Agreement 5.2.5 / 6.3.5 Pursuant to ORC Section 9.76(B), the A/E or Contractor or CM or DB warrants that it is not boycotting any jurisdiction with whom the State of Ohio can enjoy free trade, including Israel, and will not do so during the term of this Agreement or Contract.

5


CM at Risk Revisions(Coming Soon)

• GC 4.7 Self Performed Work becomes a defined term and must be provided by the CM’s or CM Affiliated Entity’s direct employees

• GC 6.22.1.1 Revises CM’s obligation to correct Defective Work and recover schedule deficiencies from “begin to correct … and recover” to “promptly commence and diligently pursue correction …”

6



• GC 6.27.1.2 Revises obligation to notify insurers providing property insurance for the Project from “A/E with the assistance of the Owner” to “Owner with the assistance of the CM and A/E”

• GC 9.2.3.2 Modifies payment of CM’s Fee from “percent complete basis” to “earned Cost of the Work on the basis of the CM’s Fee percentage identified in the Agreement”

7



• GC 9.2.8 Requires CM to develop Alternates during Preconstruction and permits Owner to use “buy-out savings” to add them to Project

• GC 10.1.5 Requires CM to deliver the new “Acknowledgement of Surety” form as evidence Surety received notice of increase

• GC 10.4 Certified copy of complete builder’s risk insurance policy is a condition precedent to payment of any portion of Contract Sum

8


Hybrid DB/Performance Contract(May 2017)

• Uses appropriate aspects of each delivery method to benefit both the State and ESCOs

• Two-step best value selection process from Design-Build: RFQ to shortlist 3 firms for RFP

• Best value from performance contract: 70% qualifications, 20% savings, and 10% cash flow

• Pricing transparency from DB: Fee + Design Fee + Cost of Work (Project Development Compen-sation instead of Preconstruction Compensation

9


Contact Information

Lane Beougher

[email protected]


Operations/Sustainability


F. Jeffrey Murray, FAIA

CH2M

Using the Building Performance Framework to Manage Complexity


Navigating the Complexity of Modern Facilities

13

RESOURCE SUSTAINABILITY

OCCUPANT EXPERIENCE

SYSTEM RESILIENCE

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

4 workshops with stakeholders to identify relative importance:


Managing Complexity: The Building Performance Framework

14


Occupant Experience• Primary Activities• Supporting Activities• Character and

Culture• Tech Interface• Comfort & Wellness• Amenities

15

RS

SR

OE

IT


System Resilience

• Reliability

• Flexibility

• Redundancy

• Preparedness

• Maintenance

• Security

16


Resource Sustainability

• Site

• Energy

• Water

• Materials

• Space

• Time

17


Advanced Technology

• Facility Applications

• Occupancy Analytics

• Asset Management

• Communication

• IT Infrastructure

• Smart Materials

18

RS

SR

OE

IT

Embedded versus Cyber-physical Systems


Contact Information

F Jeffrey [Jeff] Murray, FAIA

[email protected]


Stephen J. Cooper, RRO, CDT

Aadvanced Building Products/Carlisle Syntec

Strengthening LEED

@OHFacilities / #OFCConf17 21

Heating & Cooling Degree DaysHeating vs.

Cooling Ratio

9x

8x

5x

6x

11x

9x

12x


DOE’s Roof Savings CalculatorR-20, post 1990 construction, mid-efficiency, 10,000 SF office with Gas Heat

City Cooling benefit with White

Heating Penalty with Black

Annual Net Penalty with White

Energy Efficient Color

Akron $174 $371 $197 Black

Cleveland $160 $357 $198 Black

Columbus $161 $402 $241 Black

Dayton $148 $388 $240 Black

Mansfield $152 $360 $208 Black

Toledo $121 $334 $213 Black

Youngstown $105 $396 $291 Black

22


RCI Interface Article – Oct 2013Preliminary Analysis of Energy Consumption for Cool Roofing Measures

23


Stanford Study Cool roofs may contributeto global warming

• Effects of Urban Surfaces and White Roofs on Global and Regional Climate– 20 yr. simulation of converting all roofs to white– Results showed local cooling of 0.02K however:

• Global temperatures increased by 0.07K• White roofs reflect heat back up into the

atmosphere where it mixes with black and brown soot particles to increase global warming

24


Weathering Performance

• Xenon Arc TestingkJ/m2

– 60-mil EPDM Black 41,580 – 60-mil EPDM Black Rein 35,320 – 60-mil EPDM White 25,200

– 60-mil Thermoplastic 20,160

– 1,260 kJ/m2 = 1 year exposure in Miami to see surface cracking under 7x magnification

25


Unified Facilities Guide Spec 2012

• ”Standards such as LEED® promote the use of cool roofing, and increased energyconservation through additional insulation. Consider that when cool roofing is used withinsulation R-Values greater than 24, the “cool roof” surface has little if no influence on theenergy performance of the building. Additionally,

• Condensation on the underside of mechanically-fastened systems can result in ice build-up inwinter, mold growth, on the facers, moisture dripping into the interior, and replacement of theroofs with less than four years of service.

• Poor design of cool roofs in ASHRAE climate zones 4 and higher have resulted in the— a result of the material’s

inability to warm and drive moisture downward. Roofs that experience this condensation havehad to be replaced.”

26

http://www.goarmy.com/


Contact Information

Stephen J. Cooper

[email protected]


Scanning/Testing


Chad Knutson & Alex Rayis

Gilbane Building Company

Structured Light Scans vs. Lidar (Laser Scan): Differentiating the Value Streams


Scanning Explained

30


LIDAR Scanning

31


LIDAR Scanning – Case Study

32


Structured Light Scanning

33


SLS – Case Study

34


LIDAR Value SLS Value

• Accuracy / Survey Grade

• Use in Prefabrication

• Complicated Models

• Industry Standard

35

• Accessibility/Online

• Communication and Understanding

• Virtual As-Built

• Simple Models

• Faster/ Mores Scans


Contact Information

Chad Knutson

[email protected]

Alex Rayis

[email protected]


Mark LaBell Jr

SSOE Group

Reducing Waste Through Reality Capture

Really?!?

I have a HDD full of scans, 30% is due by the end of the week.


What is Lean?

Lean means creating more value for customers with fewer resources. A lean organization understands customer value and focuses its key processes to continuously increase it.

Source: www.lean.org


Value Proposition for scanning

• SSOE safety-always culture: zero incidents, zero exposures, and zero injuries

• Engineers spend more time engineering and less time measuring in field resulting in a better design

• Geographic dispersed teams can virtually tour a site

• SSOE returned $1.5M in VP to our clients


• Standard of care on our retrofit projects

• Rely on vendor network

• Scan 2 BIM provides no value

How we approach scanning


Editing Point Clouds to create Deliverables


Case Studies

Industrial Project 2D As-built


Why Training is Important


Contact Information

Mark LaBell, [email protected]


BREAK


Construction Apps

Craig Weise, OFCC


Lisa A. Laney, LEED AP, BD+C

Sustainability Administrator

Kasey Corbet, AIA, LEED AP

Garmann Miller Architects & Engineers

OFCC Update: LEED Version 4


LEED Version 4

• LEED V3 Overview

– Applicable Standards

• LEED V4

– Initial Evaluation

– Comparison of V3 to V4

– Applicable Codes & OSDM

– Pilot Projects

48


LEED Version 4

– LEED V4 Pilot Projects

• Documenting project credits and potential issues

• Working directly with GBCI & OFCC on credit issues

• OFCC to gather industry reps to discuss V4

– Final Evaluation for Customer Benefits

– OFCC Options

• Silver or Certified Under V4

• Different Environmental Rating System

• Incorporate V3 common school credits into OSDM

49


LEED for Schools Comparison

v 2009 v 4

7 Credit Categories 9 Credit Categories

10 Prerequisites 14 Prerequisites

110 Total Points 110 Total Points

40 – 49 Certified 50 – 59 Silver60 – 79 Gold 80 – 110 Platinum

58 Credits 52 Credits


Project Site

51


➢ Changes to Credit Requirements

52

▪ Updated referenced standards▪ Additional requirements▪ Previously acceptable compliance

paths removed

➢ 16 Credits Combined or Split

➢ 3 Credits Removed

➢ 11 New Credits

LEED V4: It’s A New Rating System



Contact Information

Kasey Corbet

[email protected]

Lisa A. [email protected]


Bruce Ferguson

Cleveland State University

Upcoming Business Opportunities: Higher Education


Cleveland State University

Building County Total Project Budget

Delivery Method

A/E Solicitation

(date expected)

CMR/DB/GC/Bid Solicitation (date expected)

New Engineering Building – Phase 2

Cuyahoga $16,000,000 CMR N/ABialosky

Cleveland

N/AGilbane

School of Film, Television and Interactive Media

Cuyahoga $7,500,000 CMR N/A Van Auken

Akins Architects

N/AConstructAbilit

y, Inc.

Engaged Science Learning Labs

Cuyahoga $6,500,000 CMR N/AAECOM

N/ATurner

Total $30,000,000 56


Contact Information

Bruce Ferguson

[email protected]


Jeff Westhoven

Chief of Program Services

Upcoming Business Opportunities:OFCC


Audience Profile

Public Owner18%

Consulting8%

Architecture/ Design

24%

Engineering/ Surveying

13%Contracting/

Subcontracting32%

Other5%


Factors in pursuing projects

• Service needed

• Project size

• Location

• Timing

• Delivery model

• Owner

60


Known projects & timelines

61


Known projects & timelines

62

• Service needed

• Project size

• Location

• Timing

• Delivery model

• Owner


Types of opportunities

63

• A/E• CxA• Planning



64

• CMR• D-B• Energy PC



65

• GC• MP



66

• A/E• CxA• Owner Agent• Planning• Consulting


Consultant Lists

67

Type

No. of

FirmsContract

End

Max. $/

Biennium

Solici-

tation

Enhanced Commissioning Agents 9 6/30/19

Hazardous Materials Consultants 6 6/30/19 250,000

Owner Agent Services 12 6/30/19 250,000

Regional Program Management Consultants 4 6/30/19

Facilities Assessment / Master Planning

Consultant Services

9 6/30/19

Architect and Landscape Architect Services 141 6/30/19 250,000

Engineer, Surveying, and Energy Services 143 6/30/19 250,000

Pre-qualified Project Management Services 7 6/30/18 Mar-18

Neutral Facilitation Consultants 2 6/30/18 Mar-18

Project Auditing Services 2 6/30/18 Mar-18

Claims Evaluation Services 4 6/30/18 Mar-18

Educational Planning Consultants 4 6/30/18 Mar-18



68

All types


Factors in pursuing projects

• Service needed

• Project size

• Location

• Timing

• Delivery model

• Owner

69


Capital Projects

• Service needed

• Project size

• Location

• Timing

• Delivery model

• Owner

70

Ohio General Assembly: Capital Projects by County, pp. 8-38

https://www.lsc.ohio.gov/documents/budget/131/capitalAppropriations/itemAnalysis/capitalbudget-sb310-en.pdf


Capital Projects

• Service needed

• Project size

• Location

• Timing

• Delivery model

• Owner

71

Ohio General Assembly: Capital Appropriations by Agency Line Item and Fund, pp. 60-180

https://www.lsc.ohio.gov/documents/budget/131/capitalAppropriations/itemAnalysis/capitalbudget-sb310-en.pdf


In capital bill? Whose selection?

Project Type Funding SizeProcurement

(most common)Process

Capital

Bill?

K-12 SchoolState & Local Any OFCC & Local ORC 153 Yes

Local Any Local ORC 153 No

State Agency State<$1.5 M Agency ORC 153 Yes

>$1.5 M OFCC ORC 153 Yes

Higher EducationState

<$ 4 M Higher Ed ORC 153 Yes

>$ 4 MHigher Ed and/or

OFCCORC 153 Yes

Local Any Higher Ed ORC 153 No

Cultural Facilities State & Local Any Local ORC 123 Yes

Energy Performance

Contract

State Any OFCC ORC 156 No

K-12 Any Local ORC 3313 No


Upcoming Capital Projects:State Agency & Higher Education – thru Dec. 2017

Project

No. Department Project

Construction

Budget

Bid

Opening

A/E

Selection

DVS-

170002Veterans Services

Sandusky - Masonry renovation, ceiling,

lights and door replacements$9,620,000 Jan-18 Oct-17

EXP-

170001Ohio Expositions Celeste Hall Renovations $7,700,000 Nov-17

DYS-

170167Youth Services

Indian River Juvenile Correctional

Facility Resident Wing Roof Repairs$1,100,000 Nov-17

DYS-

160143Youth Services

Circleville Juvenile Correctional Facility

Program Building & Renovations$3,500,000 Apr-18 Nov-17

DOT-

170006Transportation Monroe FSMF $7,150,000 12/19/17

DOT-

170003Transportation Union FSMF $7,101,202 12/19/17


Project No. Department Project

Construction

BudgetBid Opening

DOT-

140011Transportation Washington FSMF $7,150,000 1/9/18

DOT-

170010Transportation Roberts Rd FSMF $7,101,202 1/9/18

DOT-

170004Transportation Dryden Rd FSMF $7,101,202 1/30/18

DOT-

170005Transportation Greene FSMF $7,101,202 1/30/18

DVS-

150001Veterans Services Sandusky - Windows Replacement $1,830,000 Jan-18

DMH-

150007

Mental Health &

Addiction Svcs.Heartland Patient area $2,360,000 Jan-18

Upcoming Capital Projects:State Agency & Higher Education – Jan. 2018


Project No. Department Project

Construction

BudgetBid Opening

DOT-

170002Transportation Perry FSMF $7,150,000 2/20/18

DOT-

160002Transportation

I-70 Preble County Eastbound Rest Area Bldg.

Replacement$2,400,000 2/20/18

COM-

170001Commerce

HVAC Upgrades and Forensics Stge.

/Maintenance Structure$3,658,000 Feb-18

CTI-170001 Columbus State Culinary and Hospitality School (CMR) $25,300,000 Mar-18

DYS-

170168Youth Services Cuyahoga Hills JCF General Renovations $400,000 Mar-18

DMH-

170021

Mental Health &

Addiction Svcs.Northwest Psychiatric Hospital $3,260,000 Apr-18

JSC-170002 Supreme Court Moyer Exterior Repairs $5,800,000 Apr-18

DOT- Transportation I-71 Warren Co NB & SB Rest Areas $6,000,000 Apr-18

DVS-

150002Veterans Services Sandusky - Veterans Hall HVAC Upgrade $4,780,000 Jun-18

Upcoming Capital Projects:State Agency & Higher Education – Feb/June 2018


Upcoming Capital Projects:Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction

Institution Project

Construction

Budget Method A/E Selection BVS/Bid

Lebanon/Warren &

Chillicothe/RossGeneral renovations $20,466,000 CMR 8/24/17

Statewide (multiple

Facilities)Emergency power upgrades $1,500,000 D-B

CA/E

Oct-17Jan-18

Mansfield Correctional Cell windows $1,450,000 D-BCA/E

Oct-17Jan-18

Southern Ohio

CorrectionalPlumbing upgrade $1,467,000 GC Mar-18

Marion Correctional Electrical switchgear $1,936,000 GC Mar-18

Southern Ohio

Correctional

Sanitary sewer and wastewater

treatment plant$2,752,000 GC

Study Sep-17

A/E Nov-17Apr-18


Kent State University

77

Building Total Project Budget

Building

Total Project Budget

MACC Annex Athletic Court Renovations $1,500,000

Eastway Center Dining Hall Renovations

$5,000,000

Tuscarawas Campus Entry Roadway

$3,100,000 Business Administration Building Starbucks Addition

$1,500,000

College of Podiatric Medicine Roof, Phase I

$600,000 College of Communication and Information Dean’s Suite

$800,000

Women’s Lacrosse Locker Room

$300,000


Contact Information

Michael Bruder

[email protected]


Bowling Green State University

79

Building Project

Construction

Budget Method

A/E

Selection BVS/Bid

Maurer Center $44,200,000 CMRTCI/P+W

selected

Late

2017

Harshman

Residence Hall

Demolition –

Engineering Services+ $2,000,000 CMR


Contact Information

Barbara Shergalis

[email protected]


Owner Contact InformationState Agency/Higher Educationofcc.ohio.gov/Opportunities/Owner-administered.aspx


K-12 Project Status (2016)

82

Complete

Partial

Waiting for local $

Waiting for state $


K-12 project spending by County

83

FY2015



84

FY2016



85

FY2017


New K-12 projects


New K-12 projects: FY17-18

District County Total BudgetDelivery Method

A/E Solicitation

CMR/DB/GC Solicitation

Carlisle Local School District Warren $ 42,178,974 CMR 8/22/17 9/22/17

Greenon Local School District Clark $ 44,374,067 CMR Aug-17 Sep-17

New Bremen Local School District Auglaize $ 12,339,532 CMR 8/25/17 Aug-17

Southwest Licking Local School District Licking $ 116,206,278 CMR 8/15/17 9/15/17

Warren Local School District Washington $ 53,430,964 CMR Aug-17 Sep-17

Canal Winchester Local School District Franklin $ 60,657,440 CMR 4/20/17 5/1/17

Minster Local School District Auglaize $ 18,025,762 MP-CMA 6/2/17 TBD

Toronto City School District Jefferson $ 9,940,120 DB TBD TBD

Clark-Shawnee Local School District Clark $ 49,906,908 TBD TBD TBD

Total $ 407,060,045


Business Opportunities

• Known projects/timelines – OFCC website

• How to find info on capital projects

• Who selects firms and contact information

• Upcoming state agency/higher ed projects

• Current state and spending on K-12 projects

• Upcoming K-12 projects

88


Jeff Westhoven

[email protected]

Contact Information


Craig Weise, OFCC

Ask OFCC


This concludes The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems Course

Provider Name: Ohio Facilities Construction CommissionProvider #: G442Contact: [email protected]

Reminder: Pick up your Certificate of Participation at

the Registration desk.