27
LowCarb AnimalBased Diet vs. 90%+ PlantBased Diet with No Sugar, Refined Grains or Oils John Mackey March 5, 2015

Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Low-­‐Carb  Animal-­‐Based  Diet  vs.  

90%+  Plant-­‐Based  Diet    with  No  Sugar,  Refined  Grains  or  Oils  

 John  Mackey  

March  5,  2015  

Page 2: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

 

• Calorie  density  was  rare  for  most  of  our  evolu>on.  

• Salt  was  also  scarce  away  from  sea  coasts.  

 

• We  gene>cally  evolved  to  crave  calorie  density  through  fat,  sugar,  refined  grains  &  animal  foods.  

•  Foods  today  have  been  gene>cally  altered  to  maximize  calorie  density.  

•  Food  addic>ons  are  now  normal.  

GeneFc  EvoluFon:  Programmed  for  Calorie  Density  

Page 3: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Increasing  Obesity  in  the  U.S.    (Adults  20-­‐74  Years  Old)  

15%  

23%  

31%  36%  

1971-­‐1974   1988-­‐1994   1999-­‐2000   2009-­‐2010  Na>onal  Health  and  Nutri>on  Examina>on  Survey,  Prevalence  and  trends  in  obesity  in  U.S.  adults  (Ogden,  Carroll,  Flegal),  CDC      

Page 4: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

25%  Increase  in  Calories  Since  1970  

 1,500    

 1,700    

 1,900    

 2,100    

 2,300    

 2,500    

 2,700    

 2,900    

1970   1990   2010  

Average  U.S.  Daily  Calorie  Intake  

513  kcal/day  25%  increase  

United  States  Department  of  Agriculture,  Economic  Research  Service  Food  Availability  (Per  Capita)  Data  System,  Loss-­‐Adjusted  Food  Availability  

Page 5: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

The  Standard  American  Diet  (SAD)  

Source:  Economic  Research  Service,  United  States  Department  of  Agriculture:  Loss-­‐Adjusted  Food  Availability  

54%  

32%  

11%  4%  

Vegetables,  fruit,  nuts  &  beans  

Whole  grains  

Animal  products   Processed  foods  

Page 6: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

PROCESSED FOODS

The  Whole  Foods  Plant-­‐Based  Diet  

Animal  foods    0-­‐10%  

Whole  grains,  vegetables,  fruit,  beans,  nuts,  seeds    90-­‐100%  

Page 7: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

The  Case  Against  Low-­‐Carb,    High-­‐Animal  Foods  Diets  

Page 8: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Per  Capita  Meat  ConsumpFon  Has  Increased  70%  Since  1940!  

Page 9: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

U.S.  Annual  Cheese  ConsumpFon  (pounds  per  person)  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

25  

30  

35  

1915   1935   1955   1975   1995   2012  

33.5  lbs  

hYp://media.eatwisconsincheese.com/dairyimpact/sta>s>cs/cheeseSta>s>cs.aspx    

Page 10: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Micro  Nutrient  Density  per  Calorie  

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

oils and refined sugars

refined grains

cheese

full-fat dairy

red meat

eggs

fat-free dairy

wild meats & fowl

fish

raw nuts & seeds

whole grains

starchy vegetables

fruits (average)

beans (average)

non-starchy, non-green vegetables

solid green vegetables

raw leafy green vegetables

Eat  to  Live  by  Dr.  Joel  Fuhrman  based  on  USDA  figures  

Page 11: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

All  Major  Studies  Show  an  Increase  in  All  Cause  Disease  and  Death  from  Animal  Based    

Low-­‐Carbohydrate  Diets    

No  Studies  of    High-­‐Carbohydrate  Diets  Show  Similar  Effects  

Page 12: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Low-Carbohydrate Diets and All-Cause Mortality: ASystematic Review and Meta-Analysis of ObservationalStudiesHiroshi Noto1,2*, Atsushi Goto1,2, Tetsuro Tsujimoto1,2, Mitsuhiko Noda1,2

17  studies  with  over  700,000  people  Low  carbohydrate  diets  associated  with  a  31%  increase  in  deaths  from  all  causes      “Our  systema>c  review  and  meta-­‐analyses  of  worldwide  reports  suggested  that  low-­‐carbohydrate  diets  were  associated  with  a  significantly  higher  risk  of  all-­‐cause  mortality  in  the  long  run.    These  findings  support  the  hypothesis  that  the  short-­‐term  benefits  of  low  carbohydrate  diets  for  weight  loss  are  poten>ally  irrelevant.”   PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55030.

Page 13: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

 

     The  Harvard  School  of  Public  Health  completed  the  largest,  longest  study  ever  on  meat  and  survival  in  2012.    They  followed  120,000  people  for  22-­‐28  years  and  found  a  13%  increased  risk  of  dying  for  each  serving  (2  to  3  oz)  of  unprocessed  red  meat  eaten  per  day  and  20%  for  processed  red  meat.  

                           

Red  Meat  ConsumpFon  and  Mortality    Results  from  Two  ProspecFve  Cohort  Studies    

An  Pan,  PhD;  Qi  Sun,  MD,  ScD;  Adam  M.  Bernstein,  MD,  ScD;  MaYhias  B.  Schulze,  DrPH;  JoAnn  E.  Manson,  MD,  DrPH;  Meir  J.  Stampfer,  MD,  DrPH;  Walter  C.  WilleY,  MD,  DrPH;  Frank  B.  Hu,  MD,  PhD;  Arch  Intern  Med.  2012;172(7):555-­‐563.  doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2287.  

 

Page 14: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

!  Over  43,000  women,  30  -­‐  49  years  old  were  followed  for  more  than  15  years.      

!  Overall  a  60  percent  increased  risk  of  cardiovascular  events  occurred  in  those  adhering  beger  (score  above  16)    to  a  low  carb,  high  protein  diet.    

!  The  results  showed  a  gradual  and  consistent  increased  risk  of  developing  cardiovascular  disease  and  cardiovascular  death  the  higher  the  consump>on  of  animal  products  and  reduc>on  in  carbohydrates.      

!  Their  conclusion:  Low-­‐carbohydrate,  high-­‐protein  diets,  are  associated  with  increased  risk  of  cardiovascular  disease.  

BMJ. 2012 Jun 26;344:e4026.

Page 15: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Low-­‐carb,  High-­‐protein  Diet:  Cardiovascular  Disease  Risk  

Incide

nce  of  cardiovascular  e

vents  

Low-­‐carbohydrate,  high-­‐protein  diet  score  (0-­‐20)  hYp://www.bmj.com/highwire/filestream/591596/field_highwire_ar>cle_pdf/0/bmj.e4026  

 

Page 16: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

1000+    Studies  Confirm:  !  Red  meat  &  processed  meat  

increases  risk  of  colon  cancer  !  Plant-­‐based  diet  consis>ng  of  

whole  grains,  fruits,  vegetables  and  beans  decreases  risk  of  colon  cancer  

!  As  a  result,  the  World  Cancer  Research  Fund/American  Ins>tute  for  Cancer  Research  recommend  ea>ng  a  plant-­‐based  diet    

PUBLICATION  OF  THE  SUPERIOR  HEALTH  COUNCIL  No.  8858    hYp://health.belgium.be/internet2Prd/groups/public/@public/@shc/documents/ie2divers/19091480.pdf

Page 17: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Animal  Protein  and  Breast  Cancer  RelaFonship  Confirmed  by  IARC  

     

87  countries  with  high  quality  data  from  the  GLOBOCAN  project  of  the  Interna>onal  Agency  for  Research  

on  Cancer:    Animal  product  consump>on  was  correlated  with  12  types  of  cancer  

with  a  lag  of  15-­‐25  years.    The  overwhelming  majority  of  countries  

used  pasture-­‐raised,  not  feedlot  animal  products.    

 Grant  WB.  A  mul>country  ecological  study  of  cancer  incidence  rates  in  2008  with  respect  to  various  risk-­‐modifying  factors.  Nutrients.  2013  Dec  27;6(1):163-­‐89.    

 

Page 18: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Animal  Product  ConsumpFon:  Breast  Cancer  Rates  Years  Later  

Breast  Can

cer  Inciden

ce,  2012  

Calories  from  Animal  Products,  1993  Grant  WB.  A  mul>country  ecological  study  of  cancer  incidence  rates  in  2008  with  respect  to  various  risk-­‐modifying  factors.  Nutrients.  2013  Dec  27;6(1):163-­‐89.  

 

Page 19: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

The  Case  for  Whole  Foods    90%+  Plant-­‐Based  Diets  

Page 20: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

!  100%  whole  foods    !  90%  to  100%  plant-­‐based  !  Whole  food  starches  are  the  main  calorie  source  !  No  refined  sugars,  grains  or  oils  !  Nutrient  density-­‐-­‐unlimited  vegetables  &  fruits  !  Healthy  fats  primarily  from  nuts,  seeds  &  avocados  

The  Whole  Foods  Plant-­‐Based  Diet  

Page 21: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

All  Documented  Longest-­‐Lived  SocieFes  Have  Been  Whole  Foods  90%+  Plant-­‐Based  

Page 22: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Seventh  Day  AdvenFst  Health  Study  

" BMI:    Vegan  23.6,  vegetarians  25.7,  omnivores  28.8  

" Vegan  Adven>sts  who  ate  nuts  and  seeds,  exercised  and  did  not  smoke  were  the  longest  lived  cohort  ever  discovered  in  modern  >mes  

" Males  lived  14  years  longer  than  average  Caucasian  American  

" Females  lived  10  years  longer  than  average  Caucasian  American  

" Men:    60%  lower  risk  of  cancer,  76%  lower  risk  of  heart  disease  

" Women:    66%  lower  risk  of  cancer  98%  lower  risk  of  heart  disease  

   

12-­‐year  study,  34,000  people  

Fraser GE, Shavlik DJ. Ten Years of Life, Is It a Matter of Choice? Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1645-1652.

Page 23: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Dean  Ornish  Lifestyle  Heart  Trial  

"  Pa>ents  all  had  Coronary  Heart  Disease  

"  Experimental  group  followed  a  vegetarian  diet:    10%  of  calories  from  fat,  15-­‐20%  protein,  70-­‐75%  starches  

"  Total  cholesterol  fell  24.3%;  LDL  cholesterol  fell  37.4%;  HDL  did  not  change  

"  Aner  one  year,  82%  of  pa>ents  in  the  experimental  group  showed  significant  reversal  of  heart  disease  

Ornish  D,  Brown  S,  Scherwitz  L,  et  al.    Can  lifestyle  changes  reverse  coronary  heart  disease?    The  Lancet  1990;  336:  129-­‐133.    

Page 24: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Total  Health  Immersion  Program  •  Available  for  free  to  all  

unhealthy  Whole  Foods  team  members  

•  One  week  of  medically  supervised  healthy  ea>ng  transforma>on  

•  Over  3,000  team  members  have  par>cipated  

•  Obesity,  diabetes,  heart  disease  all  reversed  quickly  

•  Saving  Whole  Foods  Market  many  millions  of  dollars  in  health  care  costs  each  year  

Page 25: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

ConfirmaFon  Bias  “The  human  understanding  when  it  has  once  adopted  an  opinion  (either  as  being  the  received  opinion  or  as  being  agreeable  to  itself)  draws  all  things  else  to  support  and  agree  with  it.”    

   Francis  Bacon    

“People  never  get  >red  of  hearing  good  things  about  their  bad  habits.”      Dr.  John  McDougall  

 

“Eat  buYer;  drink  milk  whole,  and  feed  it  to  the  whole  family.    Stock  up  on  creamy  cheeses,  offal,  and  sausage,  and  yes,  bacon.    None  of  these  foods  have  been  demonstrated  to  cause  obesity,  diabetes  or  heart  disease.”  

   Nina  Teicholz    

Page 26: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Summary  &  Conclusion    

!  America  is  fat,  sick,  and  dying  from  dietary  and  lifestyle  diseases    !  The  solu>on  is  simple  to  understand:  we  must  eat  a  whole  foods,  

90%+  plant-­‐based  diet.This  diet  has  been  shown  to  keep  us  lean  and  healthy,  prevent  diabetes,  reverse  heart  disease,  decreases  cancer  risk  and  maximizes  longevity.  

 !  A  low-­‐carb  animal  centered  diet  can  lose  weight  in  the  short  term,  

but  is  not  op>mal  for  long-­‐term  health  or  longevity.    !  Nina  Teicholz  is  telling  people  exactly  what  they  want  to  believe—

that  buYer,  meat,  cheese,  bacon,  and  eggs  are  good  for  them.    However,  these  foods  are  not  good  for  people,  and  she  never  proves  they  are  in  her  book  or  in  this  debate.    Instead  she  compares  again  and  again  a  low  carb  diet  against  a  straw  man  diet,  what  she  calls  a  low-­‐fat  diet,  but  it  is  in  reality  a  processed  foods  diet  full  of  sugar  and  refined  carbs  and  not  actually  low-­‐fat  at  all.    

 !  Each  of  us  the  poten>al  to  be  healthy,  fit,  and  lean.    We  should  be  

able  to  live  past  100  in  good  health  and  disease  free.    That  is  the  goal  I  have  set  for  myself  and  it  is  the  goal  each  of  us  has  the  poten>al  to  realize.  

Page 27: Low$Carb)Animal$Based)Diet) vs. 90%+Plant$Based)Diet

Low-­‐Carb  Animal-­‐Based  Diet  vs.  

90%+  Plant-­‐Based  Diet    with  No  Sugar,  Refined  Grains  or  Oils  

 John  Mackey  

March  5,  2015