Upload
sunila
View
47
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Big Picture about Kids Texas Center for the Judiciary F. Scott McCown, Executive Director Dick Lavine, Senior Fiscal Analyst Eva DeLuna Castro, Senior Budget Analyst. Lots of Kids . Second largest child population, totaling over 6.1 million under the age of 18 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
The Big PictureThe Big Pictureabout Kidsabout Kids
Texas Center for the JudiciaryTexas Center for the JudiciaryF. Scott McCown, Executive Director
Dick Lavine, Senior Fiscal AnalystEva DeLuna Castro, Senior Budget Analyst
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Lots of Kids • Second largest child population, totaling
over 6.1 million under the age of 18
• Largest growth in child population between 2000-2003– 350,000 additional children– 183,000 more than California
• By 2040, school enrollment projected to double
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Our Changing Demographics
53.1
24.2
11.6 7.9
32.0
59.1
3.38.8
-
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
2000 2040Using U.S. Census count for 2000 and State Data Center 1.0 projection scenario for 2010-2040
Percent of Texas Population
AngloBlackHispanicOther
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Great Need for Public Services
TexasUS
AverageTexas rank
% of Population under 18, 2002 28.0 % 25.3 % 3rd
Child Poverty Rate, 2003 22.8 % 17.7 % 8th
Elderly Poverty Rate, 2003 13.0 % 9.8 % 7th % of Under-65 Population with No Health Insurance, 2003
26.9 % 17.6 % 1st
% of Residents Aged 25 or over with at least a High School Diploma, 2003
77.8 % 83.6 % 49th
% of Residents Aged 25 or over with at least a Bachelor’s Degree, 2003
24.5 % 26.5 % 27th
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, March CPS and American Community Survey
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
What State Government Pays For
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, State Government Finances series. Data for 2002 for Texas, total expenditures (including trust) of $70.3 billion.
Cash aid - 1.2%
Education - 37%
Medicaid and public welfare -
22% Police & Corrections
5% Other/ inallocable - 5%Gov.
Admin.2%
Debt Svc. - 1%
Health-3%
Highways - 7%
Insurance Trust (Pensions, UI) -
12%
Natural Resources & Parks 1%
Hospitals - 5%
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
What Local Government Pays For
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Government Finances series. Data for 2002 for Texas, total expenditures (including trust) of $77.1 billion.
Education - 44%
Other/ inallocable - 8%
Debt Svc. - 5%
Gov. Admin. - 4%Utilities - 12%
Health - 2%
Hospitals - 5%
Streets & Hwys. 3%
Fire - 2%Insurance
Trust - 1%
Police & Corrections - 6%
Natural Resources & Parks 3%
Housing & Comm. Dev. - 2%
Sewerage & Solid Waste 3%
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Comparing 2004-05 to 2006-07• Final 2006-07 budget: $138 billion in All Funds• This is 9% more than in 2004-05, less than
expected growth in population and inflation• Nationally, state spending per resident has
been about 50% higher than Texas state spending, and this budget will leave Texas near the bottom in spending per resident
• As a percentage of the economy, since 1991, state spending has been roughly 7%, and this budget will be about the same
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Texas State Government SpendingPer Capita (Left Axis) and as a Share of State Economy (Right Axis)
1,938 1,940 1,963 1,911 1,828 1,864 1,856 1,769
796 822 901 950 9741,035999993
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20072%
4%
6%
8%
General Revenue and Other State Funds
Federal
As a % of GSP
2005 $ % of GSP
2006-07 based on SB 1, 2005 Regular Session (excludes vetoes and subsequent budget actions)
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Public Education Spending• 2003-04 Texas spent $7,335 per student
• Texas ranked 34th among the states
• Average state spending was $8,208 about 12% higher than Texas
• Costs of living adjustments are faulty– Austin: 106.1% of U.S. Average– Dallas: 98.5% of U.S. Average– Houston: 96.1% of U.S. Average
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
District Property Value Per Weighted Student Average Daily Attendance
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
1 51 101 151 201 251 301 351 401 451 501 551 601 651 701 751 801 851 901 951 10011051Districts Ranked by District Property Value Per WADA
DistrictTaxable Value Per WADA
Equity LineTaxable Value Per WADA($271,400)
Robin Hood Line Taxable Value Per WADA($305,000)
(WADA)
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
School Funding in Next State Budget
Per-Pupil K-12 Spending, in 2005 $
$-
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Legislative Budget Board, S.B. 1 Funding for TEA & TRS, and Bureau of Econ. Analysis
State Aid Federal Local
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Price Tags• Biennial cost of public school enrollment growth = At least $1.5 billion
• Biennial cost of 3% inflation for public schools = At least $2.4 billion
• “Ending” Robin Hood = At least $2.3 billion
• “Buying down” local school property taxes by 10 cents per $100 taxable value = At least $2.2 billion
• Biennial cost of one candy bar per year per child is $4.3 million
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Source: Comptroller of Public Accounts, Annual Property Tax Report; Cash Report.
From a Taxpayer’s Point of ViewMajor State and Local Taxes in Texas, 2004
County Property7%
Special District Property
5%
School Property28%
Other State Taxes21%
State Sales25%
City Property7%
Local Sales7%
Sales Tax 32%
Property Tax 47%
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
From the State’s Point of View: All Revenue
State Revenue Sources, 2004(Total: $62.1 billion)
Federal Funds35%
Other6%
Lottery3%
Taxes45%
Interest/Investment Income
2%
Licenses, Fees, Permits, Fines,
Penalties9%
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
From the State’s Point of View: Taxes Only
State Tax Collections, 2004(Total: $27.9 billion)
Motor Fuels10%
Motor Vehicle Sales and Rental
10%
Sales55%
Franchise7%
Insurance4%
Sin (Cigarette, Tobacco,Alcohol)
4%
Other6%
Gas/Oil Production3%
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Our Tax Base is Inadequate
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
2.20
2.40
2.60
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Total SalesPersonal Income
Taxable Sales
Taxable Property ValueTotal Property Value
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Indicators of Ability to Pay
Texas US Average
Texas rank
Per Capita Personal Income, 2003
$29,076 $31,459 29th
State and Local Taxes as a Percent of Personal Income, 2002
9.3% 10.2% 41st
Source: CPPP, using data from Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Census Bureau.
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
14.2%
8.2%7.0%
6.5%
5.1%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
<$21,797 $21,797-39,743 $39,743-61,734 $61,734-96,693 >$96,693Household Income
Perc
enta
ge o
f Hou
seho
ld In
com
e Pa
id in
Tax
es
Households with the Lowest Income Pay the Highest Percentage in State and
Local Taxes
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Not Taxing Where the Money Is
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
<$21,797 $21,797-39,743 $39,743-61,734 $61,734-96,693 >$96,693
Household Income
Tota
l Inc
ome
Per
Gro
up($
bill
ions
)
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Revenue Options •Cigarette tax: $1/pack increase raises $1.7
billion biennially•Video Lottery Terminals: $1.1 billion
biennially. “Crack cocaine” of gambling•Revised Franchise Tax (Business Activity Tax):
Pre-tax net income, add back compensation minus first $30,000 per job times 1.95%•Sales tax rate increase — but this is extremely
regressive, and TX already has one of the highest rates•Sales tax base expansion (to services not
covered now)
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
21
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
<$26,816 $26,816-52,844
$52,844-81,990
$81,990-126,345
>$126,345
Annual income
Perce
nt of
family
inco
me
Current Property Taxes If Replaced with Sales Taxes
If We Replaced Current School Property Taxes with Sales Taxes
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
-0.2%(-$266)
0.2%$161
0.4%$213
0.6%$183
1.2% $141
-0.4%
0.0%
0.4%
0.8%
1.2%
1.6%
1 2 3 4 5Perc
ent o
f Hou
seho
ld In
com
e
$12,136 $31,127 $50,643 $78,062 $177,773 Average Annual Household Income
Source: CPPP Policy Page 232, Tax Equity Note Confirms that Most Texas Families Would Pay More Under HB 3, the “Tax Relief Bill”, March 2005.
House Proposed Tax Change(H.B. 3)
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
The Texas ConstitutionArticle 8 - TAXATION AND REVENUE
Section 24 - PERSONAL INCOME TAX; DEDICATION OF PROCEEDS
(a) A general law enacted by the legislature that imposes a tax on the net incomes of natural persons . . . must provide that the portion of the law imposing the tax not take effect until approved by a majority of the registered voters voting in a statewide referendum held on the question of imposing the tax.
(b) A general law enacted by the legislature that increases the rate of the tax, or changes the tax, in a manner that results in an increase in the combined income tax liability of all persons subject to the tax may not take effect until approved by a majority of the registered voters voting in a statewide referendum held on the question of increasing the income tax.
(f) In the first year in which a tax described by Subsection (a) is imposed and during the first year of any increase in the tax that is subject to Subsection (b) of this section, not less than two-thirds of all net revenues remaining after payment of all refunds allowed by law and expenses of collection from the tax shall be used to reduce the rate of ad valorem maintenance and operation taxes levied for the support of primary and secondary public education. In subsequent years, not less than two-thirds of all net revenues from the tax shall be used to continue such ad valorem tax relief.
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
(g) The net revenues remaining after the dedication of money from the tax under Subsection (f) of this section shall be used for support of education, subject to legislative appropriation, allocation, and direction.(h) The maximum rate at which a school district may impose ad valorem maintenance and operation taxes is reduced by an amount equal to one cent per $100 valuation for each one cent per $100 valuation that the school district's ad valorem maintenance and operation tax is reduced by the minimum amount of money dedicated under Subsection (f) of this section, provided that a school district may subsequently increase the maximum ad valorem maintenance and operation tax rate if the increased maximum rate is approved by a majority of the voters of the school district voting at an election called and held for that purpose. The legislature by general law shall provide for the tax relief that is required by Subsection (f) and this subsection.
(Added Nov. 2, 1993.)
TEXAS CONSTITUTION (Cont’d.)
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
How Would An Income Tax Work?
$11.5 billion $1.8 billion
$4 billion Two-thirds of income tax revenue would be returned to taxpayers through lower property tax rates
Uncle Sam would pick up 10% of the cost of an income tax through higher deductions on federal tax returns
Net cost to Texas taxpayers after lower property taxes, federal tax deduction changes
Total income tax revenue = $17.3 billion annually
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
A State Income Tax, With Property Tax Reductions, Would Benefit Most Texans
-8-6-4-20246
Lowest 20% Second 20% Middle 20% Fourth 20% Top 20%
Income Group
Tax C
hang
e as %
of I
ncom
e
Income tax Property tax reduction Net change
Center for Public Policy Prioritieswww.cppp.org
Texas:One and Indivisible