2
Analysis area Deloitte City Mobility Index 2020 MOBILITY ANALYSIS FUTURE OF MOBILITY CAPABILITY Service and inclusion GLOBAL LEADER TOP PERFORMER CONTENDER ASPIRING EMERGING Performance and resilience Vision and leadership KEY MOBILITY STATISTICS *Regulated, licensed, subsidised and monitored by principal transport authorities. Congestion Public transport reliability Transport safety Integrated mobility Modal diversity Vision and strategy Investment Innovation Regulatory environment Environmental sustainability initiatives Public transport density Transport affordability Air quality Customer satisfaction Accessibility Passive environment, a number of barriers Proactive environment, few barriers Proactive environment, some barriers Significant work to do FoM global leader Los Angeles Los Angeles STRENGTHS Residents in the region have approved tax increases to fund transport projects, although there is still a preference for road improvements Strong state and local support initiatives have led to high rate of adoption for electric vehicles (EV) Several new rail lines and a reorganisation of the bus network will expand capacity as the city prepares to host the Olympics in 2028 CHALLENGES Private vehicle ownership has increased faster than population growth, contributing to persistently high congestion on the roads Public transport passenger numbers have declined substantially since 2013, particularly on the bus network, which accounts for 70 per cent of total public transport numbers The city’s regulations for the provision of data on mobility have faced legal challenges from both private companies and advocates of privacy Public transport options* Commuter/heavy rail, light rail, bus, bike Monthly public transport pass US$100 GDP per capita US$74,590 (2018) Principal transport authorities Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG),and 23 municipal departments of transportation Analysis area: 4,496 km 2 | Population: 12,616,501 (2018) | Population density: 2,806/km 2 Definition of analysis area: LA-Long Beach-Anaheim area as designated by the US Office of Management and Budget (includes city area and surrounding suburban regions) JOURNEY MODAL SPLIT PRIVATE CAR WALKING BICYCLE PUBLIC TRANSPORT 3% 1% 89% 5% OTHER: 2%

Los Angeles Analysis area: 2 · Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG),and 23 municipal departments

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Los Angeles Analysis area: 2 · Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG),and 23 municipal departments

Analysis areaDeloitte City Mobility Index 2020

MOBILITY ANALYSIS

FUTURE OF MOBILITY CAPABILITY

Service andinclusion

GLOBAL LEADER

TOP PERFORMER

CONTENDER

ASPIRING

EMERGING

Performanceand resilience

Vision andleadership

KEY MOBILITY STATISTICS

*Regulated, licensed, subsidised and monitored by principal transport authorities.

Congestion

Public transport reliability

Transport safety

Integrated mobility

Modal diversity

Vision and strategy

Investment

Innovation

Regulatory environment

Environmental sustainabilityinitiatives

Public transport density

Transport affordability

Air quality

Customer satisfaction

Accessibility

Passive environment, a number of barriers

Proactive environment, few barriers

Proactive environment, some barriers

Significant work to do

FoM globalleader

Los Angeles

Los Angeles

STRENGTHS• Residents in the region have approved tax increases to fund

transport projects, although there is still a preference for road improvements

• Strong state and local support initiatives have led to high rate of adoption for electric vehicles (EV)

• Several new rail lines and a reorganisation of the bus network will expand capacity as the city prepares to host the Olympics in 2028

CHALLENGES• Private vehicle ownership has increased faster than population

growth, contributing to persistently high congestion on the roads • Public transport passenger numbers have declined

substantially since 2013, particularly on the bus network, which accounts for 70 per cent of total public transport numbers

• The city’s regulations for the provision of data on mobility have faced legal challenges from both private companies and advocates of privacy

Public transport options*Commuter/heavy rail, light rail, bus, bike

Monthly public transport pass US$100

GDP per capitaUS$74,590 (2018)

Principal transport authoritiesLos Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation

Authority (Metro), Southern CaliforniaAssociation of Governments (SCAG),and 23 municipal departments of transportation

Analysis area: 4,496 km2 | Population: 12,616,501 (2018) | Population density: 2,806/km2

Definition of analysis area: LA-Long Beach-Anaheim area as designated by the US Office of Management and Budget (includes city area and surrounding suburban regions)

JOURNEY MODAL SPLITPRIVATE CAR

WALKING BICYCLE

PUBLIC TRANSPORT

3% 1%

89% 5%

OTHER: 2%

Page 2: Los Angeles Analysis area: 2 · Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG),and 23 municipal departments

MOBILITY ANALYSIS FURTHER DETAILS:

Performance andresilience Vision and leadership Service and inclusion

Key focus areas to improve city mobility and realise the Future of Mobility:

http://www.deloitte.com/insights/future-of-mobility

http://www.http://www.deloitte.com/insights/city-mobility-index

http://www.deloitte.com/about

About the Deloitte City Mobility IndexThe Deloitte City Mobility Index reviews major cities on key aspects of mobility and the resulting relationship to economic performance. Drawing on publicly available data, client conversations, and bespoke Deloitte analyses, we assess each city’s ability to transport its citizens both now and in the future and therefore its potential to bring prosperity to the city.

As we receive feedback, we will update and expand the analysis, which may mean the results shown in this document may change.

For the full interactive index, visit the Deloitte City Mobility Index at deloitte.com/insights/mobility-index.

For Deloitte’s insights on the Future of Mobility, visit deloitte.com/insights/future-of-mobility.

About this publicationThis publication has been written in general terms and we recommend that you obtain professional advice before acting or refraining from action on any of the contents of this publication. Deloitte LLP accepts no liability for any loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication.

About DeloitteDeloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 1 New Street Square, London EC4A 3HQ, United Kingdom.

Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom affiliate of Deloitte NSE LLP, a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”). DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities. DTTL and Deloitte NSE LLP do not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn about our global network of member firms.

© 2020 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved.

Cars dominate transport use, due to unreliable public transport and the relatively low cost of private vehicles.• Measure M, a 2016 initiative to fund

transport, commits the bulk of its revenue to improving capacity on the 6,500 miles of roads, thereby encouraging individuals to continue using private vehicles.

• The city’s NextGen Bus Plan is the largest reorganisation of its bus system in 30 years. It addresses a 25 per cent drop in passenger numbers since 2013 by investing $1bn to improve speed, reliability, safety and comfort through dedicated bus lanes, covered shelters and better on-board information.

• In May 2020, Metro announced a switch to the third-party Transit app to provide more accurate real-time information and mobile ticketing and include journeys with other agencies and on private services. This is expected to save Metro $240,000 a year in software maintenance and development costs.

Low-income populations are the biggest users of public transport, particularly the bus. The city has experienced falling passenger numbers as users switch to cars, driven by lower costs of car financing and petrol. • In recent years, a strong regional economy

has led to rising rents, which have pushed low-income families to areas poorly served by public transport.

• Metro’s report ‘Understanding How Women Travel’, published in August 2019, examined women’s travel patterns, and how their various concerns can be addressed. The results will inform an upcoming Gender Action Plan.

• The region’s plan to expand cycling has progressed unevenly. Some of the smaller cities have cancelled their public cycle sharing programmes, whereas central LA continues to expand dedicated cycle lanes to encourage active methods of transport for short trips.

SUMMARY

Prioritise improvements to the bus network to

stem the decline in passenger numbers

Redirect a bigger share of tax revenues towards expansion of the public

transport network

Implement stricter policies to curb private

vehicle use

The Los Angeles transport and city authorities have been increasing their efforts to combat the growing problems of congestion and transport safety. The city seeks to expand public transport capacity through well-funded initiatives such as the Vision 2028 Plan and ‘Twenty-Eight by ‘28’ for the Olympic Games. Officials have conducted a number of studies to improve understanding of customer concerns and challenges, and to use the insights obtained to shape their short- and long-term mobility plans. The transport authorities have tried to formulate shared and sustainable solutions for a mobility ecosystem that is both advanced and inclusive, by fostering partnerships between the government, businesses, academia and residents.

CONTACTSShawn VanDiverClient Relationship ExecutiveSenior ManagerDeloitte Services LPTel: +1 (619) 756 9518Email: [email protected]

Deloitte City Mobility Index 2020 Los Angeles

Simon Dixon Global Transportation leaderPartner Deloitte MCS LimitedTel: +44 (0) 207 303 8707 Email: [email protected]

James QuaPrincipalDeloitte Consulting LLPTel: +1 (213) 593 3796Email: [email protected]

The authorities are also considering a range of novel ways to tackle congestion, integrate private modes into the transport system and improve environmental outcomes. • The city is funding a $5.5m feasibility study

on congestion charging, due to report in 2021, which will examine pricing strategies (particularly for low-income groups), funding models and possible pilot areas. This would make Los Angeles only the second city in the US to give serious consideration to such a scheme.

• The Mobility Data Specification (MDS) developed by LADOT, designed to be an open-source-data standard and software system used by private operators to provide information on discrete journeys, has raised concerns around privacy and security, and commercial sensitivities.

• Los Angeles is boosting the use of electric vehicles, by committing to procure over 150 EV buses in the next two years and installing one of the largest public fast-charging networks in the US.