Upload
yori
View
22
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Looking Into the Crystal Ball CCS- Where are we in 2020?. Nils A. Røkke, SINTEF British-Norwegian CCS workshop April 23, 2008, London. Outline. Technology Potentials Market drivers and boundary conditions 2020 case Transport and storage Summary and conclusions. No option. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Looking Into the Crystal BallCCS- Where are we in 2020?
Nils A. Røkke, SINTEF
British-Norwegian CCS workshop April 23, 2008, London
Outline
Technology Potentials Market drivers and boundary conditions 2020 case Transport and storage Summary and conclusions
Schematic diagram of possible CCS systems
SRCCS Figure TS-1
No option
CO2 capture, transport and storage – main routes
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
No Cap
ture
132
8
Amine
132
8
Oxyfu
el 13
28
ATR 132
8
CC-CLC
, 90
0°C
No ca
ptur
e 14
28
Amine
142
8
Oxyfu
el 14
28
ATR 142
8
Single
rehe
at C
C-CLC
, 100
0°C
No ca
ptur
e 15
28
Amine
152
8
Oxyfu
el 15
28
ATR 152
8
Double
rehe
at C
C-CLC
, 120
0°C
5
Net plant efficiencies of the natural gas-fired cycles
TCCS4:Jordal
BIGCO2 project
Net plant efficiencies of coal fired cycles
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Lignite PC LigniteOxy-Fuel
LigniteZEIGCC
Bit.Coal-PC
Bit.CoalPost-C
Bit.CoalOxy-Fu
Bit. Coal-ZEIGCC
Bit.Coal-CLC
Net
eff
icie
ncy
(%
LH
V)
Status for capture technologies- potential
HighTechnology Coal Gas Coal Gas Medium-HighPost-C Medium-LowZEIGCC N/A N/A LowZEIRCC N/A N/AOxy-fuelCLC
Ready for deployment Development Potential
HighTechnology Coal Gas Coal Gas Medium-HighPost-C Medium-LowZEIGCC N/A N/A LowZEIRCC N/A N/AOxy-fuelCLC
We need to do both efficiency improvements and smarter plants, natural gas case
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7
Eff.:48.9%
Eff.:55%
Quota:25€/ton
Quota: 50€/ton
c€/kWh
Investment € Billion
So where will we be in 2020?
Project mapping, capture technology vs storage
Project Timeline – R&D, Demo and Full Scale
CCS development so far All full scale plants before 2012 are gas separation/LNG
Pilot/demo ramp-up 2005-2010
Full scale ramp-up from 2013-2015
R&D projects have paved the ground
0
5
10
15
20
25
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
R&D projects
Pilot/Demo
Full scale
Accumulated full scale
Accumulated pilots
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
R&D projects
Pilot/Demo
Full scale
Accumulated full scale
Expon. (Accumulated full scale)
CCS by 2020 and beyond
Likely to see 10’s of plants by 2020 in operation
Likely to see 50-150 plants by 2030
Extrapolated
High
Low
CCS as mitigation tool, how much do we need to manage by 2100?
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 2110
Year
Acc
umul
ated
cap
ture
d C
O2
[Gto
n]
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Cap
ture
d C
O2
per
year
(G
ton/
yr)
Accumulated capture of CO2
Captured CO2/yr
CCS deployment – How many plants in the future?
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100 2110
Year
CC
S pl
ants
Accumulated # plants
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030
Year
CC
S pl
ants
Accumulated # plants
Coal: 1000 MW
Based on IPCC- 1000 Gton by 2100
IEA-ETP 2005: 12Gt by 2030
More optimistic: 100 by 2020, 260 by 2030
Order of Magnitude Investments in CCS by 2100
Based on IEA og IPCC we will need:– ~5000 CCS plants for CO2 capture and storage
Order of magnitude investment estimate (CCS only – not power plant) :
– 2300 Billion £ (+100%, -40%)
Imagine having a 1% share?
81,8 %
15,8 %
2,3 %0,1 %
Conventional Thermal
Hydroelectric
Nuclear
Other
By 2004:
Development pace - Chinese el power
Electricity Generation in China by Type, 1994-2004
0
500
1.000
1.500
2.000
2.500
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
Year
TW
h
Conventional Thermal Hydroelectric Nuclear
Source: EIA International Energy Annual
1000.6 TWh pa over 10 years (1994-2004)
• 2000-2004: 127 GWe *• 2005: 63 GWe **• 2006: 102 GWe ***• 2007: 95 GWe (UBS prognosis)
*** • Up to 2020: Another 400-450 GW *Source: * Guodon Sun: “Advanced Coal Technolgies in a Sustainable Energy System. Preparing and Preserving the Appropriate Technological
Options in China”, Workshop Report from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 19-20 Sep 2005.** Li Zheng, Tsinghua University, Beijing*** The Wall Street Journal, June 15-17, 2007
Capacity growth:
3.000
Ref. ***
Infrastructure – transport of CO2
Up to now limited experience except from US CO2 onshore flooding networks (Permian Basin)
– Network in the Netherlands for greenhouse
CO2 fertilisation (OCAP network)
– 5600 km CO2 EOR pipeines in the US– Snøhvit (150 km pipeline to offshore storage)
By 2020– Some large scale developments have taken
place but mostly 1-1 or 2-1 solutions (source-sink)– Infrastructure has so far been provided in
governmental led initiatives/funding (less EOR)
– CO2 transport has become a more widespread commercial buisness
– Widely acknowledged that CO2 transport has more to it than rules of thumb for humidity and hydrate formation, trace species influence on thermodynamic properties and heat transfer in well head/pipeline knowledge has been gained
Storage – the ultimate quest
New EU directives proposal 2008 : positive for future developments; inclusion in quota system, access, etc.
North Sea likely to have storage from power plant operations in place
On-shore, critical issue acceptance, pilots in operation, some large scale experiences gained
EOR operations will take place given the oil price interval we now have seen
Overarching: Storage capacity worldwide and source-sink matching
– Crucial to find, evaluate and qualify secure storage possibilities in for instance Asia and India
Summary
CCS is crucial for achieving reduction targets of greenhouse gases
By 2020 we will see some 10’s of plants and likely to see 100’s by 2030
Early movers within the area are all gas separation projects or EOR
Pilots are ramping up now Full scale ramps-up from 2012 The framework is underway and will be in place by 2010-
12 to allow more robust investment decisions Huge market- drivers are different than other products R&DD instrumental in achieving lower costs and
widespread deployment