21
Long-Term Trends in the Defense Budget Stephen Daggett Specialist in Defense Policy and Budgets May 5, 2010

Long-Term Trends in the Defense Budget Stephen Daggett Specialist in Defense Policy and Budgets May 5, 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Long-Term Trends in the Defense BudgetStephen Daggett

Specialist in Defense Policy and Budgets

May 5, 2010

CRS-2

Overview of Main Points1) Trends in DOD budget –

• Procurement the “bill payer” in past declines• Norm since 1955 is growth of about 2% per year

above inflation per troop in base budget

2) Growing costs require difficult choices just to stay in place

3) No real growth or declining budgets would require trade-offs• Limit personnel & O&M costs? DOD has tried.• Trim weapons procurement? Usual answer.• Reconsider size of the force? May be on the table, but

requires adjustments in strategy.

CRS-3

DOD Discretionary Budget Authority and Outlays, FY1950-FY2015

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

FY1950 FY1960 FY1970 FY1980 FY1990 FY2000 FY2010

Fiscal Year

Co

nst

ant

FY

2011

$ i

n b

illi

on

s

Budget AuthorityOutlays

Note: FY2010-FY2015, Administration projection, includes projected war costs.

CRS-4

Total DOD Budget by Title, FY1948-FY2015:Procurement Has Been the “Bill Payer” in Past Declines (includes war costs)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

FY1948 FY1958 FY1968 FY1978 FY1988 FY1998 FY2008

Fiscal Years

FY

2011

$ i

n B

illi

on

s

Military Personnel O&M

MilCon/Fam Hsing

Procurement

R&D

Note: FY2010-FY2015, Administration projection, includes projected war costs.

CRS-5

DOD Budget Authority per Active Duty Troop: FY1955-FY2015 (base budget)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015

Fiscal Year

Co

nst

ant

FY

2011

$ in

000

s

BA Per Troop

Trend: +1.9% per year

Note: Base budget only, not including war costs

CRS-6

Six Factors Driving Up the Cost of Defense

1) Increase in personnel pay and benefits: FY1998-FY2009 = 45% above inflation

2) O&M grows 2.7% per year above base inflation

[1 & 2 discussed, 3-6 in additional slides]

3) Generational cost growth in weapons4) Underestimation of weapon costs5) Reorganization of Army/lessons of wars 6) Expanded range of threats/challenges

CRS-7

Military Personnel Compensation Per Active Duty Troop, FY1972-FY2009, Indexed to FY1972, Adjusted for Inflation Using CPI

80

100

120

140

160

FY1975 FY1980 FY1985 FY1990 FY1995 FY2000 FY2005

Fiscal Year

MilPers per Troop Index1972 = 100ECI from FY1982

CRS-8

DOD Operation & Maintenance Per Troop, FY1955-FY2015 (base budget)

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015

Fiscal Year

Co

nst

ant

FY

2011

$

O&M $ per Troop

Trend: +2.7% per year

Note: Base budget only, not including war costs

CRS-9

DOD Base Budget with No Real Growth: FY2010-FY2020*(constant FY2010 $ in billions)

Military Personnel

$141Billion26%

Military Personnel $151Billion

28%

Operation & Maintenance $186 Billion

34%

Operation & Maintenance$243 Billion

45%

Acquisition$127 Billion

24%Acquisition $186 Billion

35%

Other $17 Bn.Other $24 Bn.

$0

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

FY2010 FY2020

*Assumes 0.7% annual growth in MilPers, 2.7% annual growth in O&M.

CRS-10

Alternatives if No Real Growth or Real Decline in Defense1) Reform pay & benefits system?

• E.g., less for retirement• Issue: Why take risk (current system worked)

2) Limit O&M & weapons costs? • DOD has tried repeatedly• Would be worse without continuing efforts

3) Reduce new weapons procurement? • Usual answer, but only for short term• Okay with force drawdown, but then must recover

4) Reconsider size of the force? • Difficult until withdrawals from Iraq/Afghanistan• Requires adjustments in strategy

CRS-11

Additional/Backup Slides

CRS-12

National Defense Outlays % GDP: FY1950-FY2016

0.0%

4.0%

8.0%

12.0%

FY1950 FY1960 FY1970 FY1980 FY1990 FY2000 FY2010

Fiscal Year

% G

DP

FY1952: 14.2%

FY1968:9.4%

FY1987: 6.2%

FY2011: 4.9%

FY2002: 3.0%

FY1980: 4.7%

FY1965: 7.4%

Note: FY2010-FY2015, Administration projection, includes projected war costs.

CRS-13

Weapons Recapitalization Rates: FY1985 vs. FY2008

1985 2008 ∆

Tactical Fighters 338 56 -282

Bombers 34 0 - 34

Other Fixed Wing 211 153 -58

Rotary Wing 354 373 +19

Missiles 87,113 13,471 -73,642

Tracked Combat Vehicles

2,414 1,258 -1,156

Tactical Vehicles 56,551 32,276 -24,275

Satellites (Unclassified) 10 1 -9

Ships 23 7 -16

Source: Adapted from Cecil Black, Boeing Corporation, January 2008

Procurement + R&D = $213 billion in FY1985, $244 billion in FY2008, both in FY2008 prices

CRS-14

GAO: Accuracy of Cost Estimates Grows Worse

2000 portfolio 2005 portfolio 2007 portfolio 2008 portfolio

Portfolio Size

Number of programs 75 91 95 96

Total planned commitments $805 Billion $1.5 Trillion $1.6 Trillion $1.6 Trillion

Commitments outstanding $390 Billion $905 Billion $875 Billion $786 Billion

Portfolio Performance Indicators

Change to total RDT&E costs from first estimate 27 percent 33 percent 40 percent 42 percent

Change in total acquisition cost from first estimate 6 percent 18 percent 26 percent 25 percent

Estimated total acquisition cost growth $43 Billion $206 Billion $301 Billion $296 Billion

Share of programs with 25 percent or more increase in program acquisition unit cost

37 percent 44 percent 44 percent 42 percent

Average schedule delay in delivering initial capabilities 16 months 17 months 21 months 22 months

Source: Annual GAO reviews of selected acquisition programs.

CRS-15

Increased Ground Force Requirements• 92,000 increase in Army and MC end-

strength = + $13 billion/year• Army “Modularization” = $52 billion ++• Lessons of the war:

• Force protection• Communications (every Marine in Anbar

to have a radio)• Transportation (trucks, helicopters)• National Guard combat units to be

equipped as part of rotation base

CRS-16Source: Department of Defense briefing slides, August 2004

CRS-17

2006 QDR Objective – Shift in Focus

DisruptiveTraditional

CatastrophicIrregular

Shape Choices

Defeat Terrorist

ExtremismCounter

WMD

DefendHomeland

Today's Capability Portfolio

“Shifting Our Weight”

Source: DOD briefing on 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review, February 3, 2006.

CRS-18

Breakdown of Increases in Military Pay and Benefits per Troop, FY1998 to FY2009

$33,518

$39,079

$4,174

$11,288

$3,387

$4,976

$2,630

$3,408

$11,442

$12,659

$5,484

$2,672

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

$70,000

$80,000

FY1998 FY2009

Fiscal Year

Co

nst

ant

FY

2009

$

OTHER MILPERS

DEATH GRATUITIES/SURVIVOR BENEFITS/HAZARD INSURANCE

CONCURRENT RECEIPTACCRUAL/ SPECIALDISABILITY COMPENSATION

RETIREE 65- AND OVERHEALTH CARE ACCRUAL

RETIREMENT ACCRUAL ANDSOCIAL SECURITY TAXES

PERMANENT CHANGE OFSTATION TRAVEL

SPECIAL/INCENTIVE PAYAND ALLOWANCES

BASIC ALLOWANCE FORHOUSING

BASIC PAY/ SUBSISTENCE/SEPARATION PAY

$80,004

$55,208

Note: Base budget only, not including war costs

CRS-19

Breakdown of Increases in Military Pay and Benefits per Troop, FY1998 to FY2009

FY1998 FY2009 % Change

BASIC PAY/ SUBSISTENCE/ SEPARATION PAY $33,518 $39,079 +17%

BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING $4,174 $11,288 +170%

SPECIAL/INCENTIVE PAY AND ALLOWANCES $3,387 $4,976 +47%

PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION TRAVEL $2,630 $3,408 +30%

RETIREMENT ACCRUAL AND SOCIAL SECURITY $11,442 $12,659 +11%

RETIREE 65- AND OVER MEDICAL ACCRUAL $0 $5,484 NA

CONCURRENT RECEIPT ACCRUAL/ SPECIAL DISABILITY COMPENSATION $0 $2,672 NA

DEATH GRATUITIES/ SURVIVOR BENEFITS/ HAZARD INSURANCE $26 $106 +300%

OTHER MILPERS $104 $333 +221%

TOTAL ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY PERSONNEL PAY AND BENEFITS $55,280 $80,004 +45%

Note: Base budget only, not including war costs

CRS-20

Acquisition per Troop: FY1955-FY2013 (base budget only)

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005

Fiscal Year

Co

ns

tan

t F

Y2

01

1 $

Acquisition $ per troop

Trend: +2.2% per year

Note: Base budget only, not including war costs

CRS-21

Contact Information

Stephen [email protected] 707-7642