LOKAYUKTA PRESEI'IT · By Advocate:-' Smt. Neena Jose A ' I .,': 1. Assistant Educational Officer, ,

(

KERALA LOKAYUKTA

PRESEI'IT i:..:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. DENESAN, UPA LOKAYUKTA

Complainant

Respondents

Friday, the 30th day of December,20!1

Complaint No. 1892/2010 A ', .

Chettiparambil House,,j ; Panampilly Nagar, Ernakulam, Cochin- 682 036.

By Advocate:-' Smt. Neena Jose A ' I .,'

: 1. Assistant Educational Officer, , ' '<';

(Chairman, Appeal Committee)- AEO ffice, Ernakulam. :

2 The Convener, Kalolsava Commiftee,St. Theresa's Higher Secondary School, ,

Ernakulam.

By Senior Government Pleader.

Complaint No. 2087/20{0 B

: Akhila Ashbk, Christ Nagar EHSS T\,'M, *.. minor represented by her father & guardian B,Q.'

Ashok Sio h(. Balakrishnan, AshokEhsv?n;,1-"':i. Venpat avatto m, Anaya ra, Thiruvananthapurarn.''

By Advocate:- Sivakumar S- ,.'b''

ll.

: 1. Programrne Committee Convene,:' TVM Revenue Jilla School

:,Kalolsavam, Neyyattinkara H.S.S., TVPM.2. Atvl. Jahir Hussain, Programme Committee

Convener, North Sub Jilta, TVPM.3. R. Valsala Kumai, District Education Officer,

District Education Office, Near Sasikala PolyClinic GPO Lane, Thiruvananthapuram.

I

ll

.*.': *-;r:, 1

f._l'!;.1

1

{.!i.sru

*1fi)


t.I

z

f,

-;

r' . .,:. 'r: i' !:.rr.,:-'-

'.:: , .'

Complainant

Respondents

Complainants

Comolaint No. 2106/2010 A

Kum. Anju S.S, (Minor) +lSt. Chrysostum G.H.S.,Nellimoode,Balaramapuram rep. by her father Suresh V.S.,Narayana Mandiram, :

Chenavila, Venganoor, i,,

' ,, .

,t.. I ---*

By Advocate:- Smt. R. Preelfiakumari' ' .:1 :"t )

, ; rj

Distriet,,AEO i0fficerl

Thi ruvananthapuram Revenue District,

104

1Oth studbnt, St.!

m G.H:S.,

St. Chrysostum G.H.S, Nellimoodu,Balaramapuram, (Both rep. by her father E.B.

., :

Student,

,fi

l

'i

Respondents

aa _,4 :

Kanjiramkulam).

ByAdvocate:- Sri. R. Preetha Kumari

,l.;' :,'

: 1. .General Convener (DDE),Thiruvananthapuram.

2. SecretaryrRevenue Districl, (Science Fair)Thiruvananthapuram.

3. General Convener,

" Kerala State Science / Mathematics,Social Science & lT fair, Govt. H.S. Aluva.

By Senior Government Pleader. q

ThiruvatbnthapuramDEO, Tf$ruvari6rith apu ram.

[""3

Complaint No. 2{16/2010 B :

Arya VasanthilD/s P.R,-Vasantha Kum dr,,:, '

residing at Sanlhram, Mana pally' N orlh ;p,e r r,Ka ru n a g a pa I I y; Ko I larn,re p., by. her:, n ext: frien d :

and father P.Rr,\hsanthakumat., , ,,, i ..

By Advocate:- Smt.r Bijily'Joseph, i l i:i.

.t..1.

2.

3.

The HeadtMistr:ess,Girts H.S,.':',. '. . :i'i:' i "" "Karunagapally:.i;; :: ::'.i",:::' i!::',,:: ..

TheAssistintEducational'iOfficor;.,,'.',::.:Karunagapall$d(oll?m,, :',;, :.,i ;.'ii.,., r i:i : :,

Arifa H.M..ardr€enefal eor:,ivbnet' ;;' 1'1";:'., 1';-:

Govt. H. S. S., KiS'+ Purarn,.tKol|anol,. -.,..:-,. . t- :: r,

The ;Deputf Diiieet6l.,ofiEducatbn,,l(o'lla nr,,, :

Th e,Prog rdm rfr bt ; Oomr,riittee, C6h v€n ei;.'',', i,

Kollam ReveritdiBistrietrlr''t':,i :ii :-l1i;t ii,-;i' . :

Kerala School'l(algls,bvbrfi: ;:':i, : :, 1l:,.. i-:'.Held at Anchdl;East Govt.'fl.S.S;, Anchal, ',

Kollam. i'i,...',,,,

4.E

ri::r ::r

.Com plaint Nolt2il,18i20{ 0;.B,,:,

: 1. Jishnu G.S., rdpr:esehted by his father C:S.Sabukumal Eiathu Veedu, Maruthoor,NeyyattinkararP.O.

2. Akshay S S/o'Sasikumaran C.,

J.

4.

,5.

6.

Kozhaikottukonam, Parassuvaikkal P.O.Arun Kumar M.V.,Poovamvilakathu Mele,Thattu Puthen Veedu,Udiyankulangara, Amaravila P.O.Kiran Ashok, S/o Asokan,Thiruvathira, Plamuri Puthen Veedu,Parassuvaikkal, Parassala P.O.Avhinay A.J., S/o Ajayan,Karthikayalam,Kunnathukal, karakonam P.O.Aswin S.S., S/o D. Sreekumar, Ayilyam,Parasuvaikkal, Parassala P.O.

+ r*

7. Anunathan Pillai J.S., S/o S. SukumEr?o, ,.Kannamvilakathu Veedu,Vyshnavam Vattavila P.O., B il:H:l#':il:xLt;:l:

*""reedharan Nair,

Dhanuvachapuram P.O.9. Vishnu G.S., S/o S. Gopakumar, Anjaneyam,

Near Subramoniar,n Swamy Temple,. plamoottukada p.O.'-r

10. Hareesh S. Mohan, S/o K. Mohanan Nair,Lekshmivilasom, Karavur, Plarnootukada P.O.

Vijaya Bhavan,, Kovakkaravila,;::::^::.L,,i11 -x""'Parassuvaikkal p,O.,

:i ':: :-

Bhavan, parassuvaikkal, parassala.

ByAdvocate:- Sri, Rajan T.S.

Respondents : 1. The District Educational Officer, Neyyattinkara." 2. The General Convener (Kalotsavam),1: Programme C-ommifie€,5ub-Dlslriet;-parassara.

i; By Senior Government Pleader.I

Complaint No. 212012010 B

, aomplainant : Aby Suresh, Minor represented by his fatherSuresh Kumar, T.C 3/835/-, MM Lane,' Muttada, thiruvananthapuram.

ByAdvocate:- Sri. Kavitha R.

Respondent : General Convener,

-Py. Director of Education,.Kerala School Kalolsavam 201 0-2011,Thiruvananthapuram Revenue Dist.,Neyyattinkara.

. By Senior Government Pleader.

I'ml

5

Complaint No. 212212010 C

Complainants . 1. Prasanth Mohan M.p., Minor rep. byhis father V.S. Mohanan,Prasanth Nivas, Narikkottuvila Keezhkolla,Amaravila P.O.A1 ilirldv]la r.L.r.

, 2. Alekh Mohan, Minor, rep. by his father K. ]

Mohanan Nair, ; I

Agra MannaanvilakaEl,, \vt q tYtqt tt tqql tYItqt\(

Ooruttukala, Neyyattinkara P.O. I

,By Advocate:- Sri. Babu P. .Pothencode_s!

?. Respondents . 1. The Assistant Director of Public lnstruction the €

;

. :, Mathematics / Social Science I Work Experience :1

Jagathy, Thiiuvananthapuram. r

2. The Deputy Director of Educationthe General Convener, ThiruvananthapuramRevenue District Science I Mathematics / Social

il: "ff:J,y:f':1i":'J,:l'ft fi ;[.?l:- 1 1 o/o the

Thiruvananthapuram.


R" Prakash Smrithi, Kesavadev Road,Poojappura P.O, Thiruvananthapuram

By Advocate:- Sri. Babu P Pothencode''.

F,:ri'tt.,'.^i1,. ,: -r i':-:r-l-:ir; r ',-r.-:,-rcr \vvpv..u!..!! . ,. iri.; r-,isl iuiqr L/urivei rwi, l-,rtFvl ReVenUe DiSt.', School, Kalolsavam 2010 - 11.

The Deputy Director of Education Office of DDE,Killippalam, Thiruvananthapuram.' 2. The Asst. Educational Officer and Programmet Committee Convener Thiruvananthapuram NorthSub-District School Kalolsavam 201 0Thiruvananthapruam

" By Senior Gqvernment Pleader.

lt?/ i

tffi,l,l6

Complainant

Respondents

Complainant

ByAdvocate:- Sri.


Complaint No. 2130/2010 C

Aparna A.S., Minor rep. by his father Anilkumar,Yakoguard, JRA -'1, Jagathy,Thiruvananthapuram.

Babu P. Pothencode

The General Convener, TVM Revenue Dist.School, KalolsaLam2010 - 11.Oio the Deputy Director.of Education,Killippalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

The Asst. Educational Officer,Thiruvananthapu ram North EducationalSub-District, Thiruvananthapruam.

1

2.


: P.S. Ajitha, :

Syamaragam, Kuriathi,Manacaud P.O., Thiruvananthapuram.

By Advocate:- Smt. K.S. Radhika Devi

Thiruvananthapuram.

District Educational Officer,Statue, A.G.'s Office Post Office,Thiruvananthapuram.

Assistant Ed ucational Officer,Chettikulangara, Vanchiyoor P.O.,Thiruvananthapuram North.

2.

3


Complainant

Respondent

Complaint No. 214012010 A

: Hareeshma G. Suresh, D/o V.S. Suresh Babu,. K.S. Bhavan, DPN 210, Peroorkada, TVM - 5,

represented by V.S. Suresh Babu (father)

,1

By Advocate - Sri S. Sajith

: District Education Officeir,South Sub-District, Statue, TVM


Complaint No. 214212010 B

ai Complainant

Respondent

R. Sandhya, representing her daughterAkshayaVS., Minor, Sandhya Bhavan, Porunthaman,Pulimatth P.O., Kilimanoor, Thiruvananthapuram.

By Advocate:- Smt. S. Latha

1.

2.

3

General Convenor, Kiliminoor Sub DistrictKalolsavam. Represented by Headmistress,G.H.S.S. Navayikulam.Assistant Education Officer, KilimanoorSub District.District Education Officer, Attingal.

By Senior Government Pleader,

. 'ComplaintW

Complainant ),;- :

', :1

.t.(!

Sreelekshmi Rajeevan, D/o Beena Rajeevan(Minor), Standard X, Nav Bharath HigherSecondary School, Attingal residing at LekshmiNiwas, Awaneswaram Temple P.O.. Pr!:re Roadi,rlti.irgai i:iepreserit€u by B*eiia italee va,,,Wio Rajeevan, Lekshmi Niwas, AwaneswaramTemple P.O., Palace Road, Attingal (MotherRepresenting minor in the capacity as herGuardian)

:j. (r,

Respondents '. 1 . Deputy Dii'ector of Education,'Office of the

. Deputy Director of Education, Trivandrum' (Geneial Convener for the Revenue District

i School Kalolsavam ComPetitions,Thiruvananthapuram Revenue District).

2 District Educational Officer, Office of the DEOAttingal (Chairman of the Appeal Committee'.For the Sub District School Kalolsavam.

i

3. The Convener, Tlairuvananthapuram RevenueDistrict Kalolsavarrn, Neyyattinkara.

Senior Government Pleader. i

e

By

r'' Ii WAnanthu. V.R., S/o R.P. Mjayaraghavan,Padma vilasom, Chempoor, Mudakkal P.O.,

Attingal, Thiruvananthapuram represented by hisfather R.P. Mjayaraghdvan residing at PadmaVilaSom, Chempoor, Mudakkal P.O.,Attingal, Thiruvananthapuram.

rComplainant

ByAdvocate.- Sri. K.S. Satheesh ktrrjrar

Respondent '. 1. The District Education Officer,

ThiruvananthaPuram

2. The Assistant Education Officer,

, 3. Chairman, Appellate Committee, Attingal DistrictEducational Officer, Kerala School Kalotsavam-

: 2010-11..i

a

l' 4. General Convener, ThiruvananthapuramI'Revdnue DistrictSchool Kalotsavam-2010-11,Thiruvananthapuram.


:.

Complainant

Complaint No. 8/2011 A

Anushika C Raj, represented by her mother {

Chandrika Kumary. S, Chandini Sadanam-.Thandranpoika, Venjaramoodu P. O. "".'."'

Thiruvananthapuram.By Advocate - Sri. O.B Harikumar

Responden{ '. 1. The General Convenor, Programme Committeeand Deputy Director of Education,Thiruvananthapurarn Kerala SchoolKalotsavam-2010-11 , Thiruvananthapuram :

Revenue Educational District Held at G.H.S.S., Neyyattinkaa , .t

.

' 2. The District Educational Officer, NeyyattinkaraKerala School Kalotsavam-2010-11,Thiruvananthapuram Revenue EducationalDistrict. ,

3. Convenor; Programme, Kerala SchoolKalotsava m-201 0- 1 1, ThiruvananthapuramRevenue Eclucational District Held at

i Neyyattinkara from 1 .1.2011 to 5.1.2011


Cof plaint No. 2212011 C

J- Lekshmi Bhai, Sree Chaithram, KSEB Nagar

132,.' Sakthikulangara, Kavanad, Kollam.

il2. LekshmiAnil:Kumar.

. :-i1.1'-:tr:.::i';,3i r-:-ir i-; r: il"i:-.::i1:r, Si--r..i i-Tnondil Veedu, Sakthikulangara P.O,.,'

Kollam.

q

By Advocate:-i-

Respondents ' :

Cherunniyoor P. Sasidharan Nair

The Dy. Director of Education,Thevally, Ksllam and General Convenor,Kerala School Kalolsavam Revenue District,Kollam.

Sri

1.

'^v.

t0

2. The Asst. Educational Ofilcer, Kollam. '::

3 trtil?l, epp"rr committee & AssistantEducational Officer, Kundara in charge ofKollam.



Complainant . Sachu Sasidharan Nair, Minor represented byhis mother Remani Sasidharan, Sruthilayam,

I Opp Municipality'Office Attingal,Thiruvananthapuram

ByAdvocate:- Sri. Babu P Pothencode

Respondents : 1. The General Convener,Kollam Revenue District School Kalolsavom -2010-11, O/o Deputy Director of Educition,Kollam District.

2. The Assistant Educational Officer ChathannurEducation Sub District Chathannur, Kollam Dist.


', Complaint No. 30/2011 C

4. Thabith.A. 5, AjmalA.S., 6, Shershad.S.,7. Alfas.A.,8, Jasmin . J, 9, Mihaj M., and10. Nihas.N. rep. by first complainant's fatherShamsudeen, Liyakath Manzil,

By Advocate:- Sri. A.M. Mukthar

: 1. B.S Sasikumar,Convener, Progrmme Committee,A.E.O. Office, Kollam.

.'' 2. K. Vasanthakumari,Assistant Educational Office, Kollam.

Respondents

v

\em!II

iI

The General Convener, Alappuzha RevehtreDistrrct School Kalolsava m 2010-11 , Thuravoor,Alappuzha Dist.


Cgmplainant

Respondents..'..


: Ashik Zubaid, rep. by his fatherM.K. Muhammed Kunhi,Darussalam House,

. Chirapuram P.O., Nileshwar.

t:: By Advocate.- Sri. Saji S.L.


Complaint No. ,4412011 B

. 1. The District Education Ofiicer, :

Chairman Appeal Committee,Kanjhangad Educational District SchoolKalolsavam, Kanjhangad.

2. TheAssistant Education Officer,Hosdurg Sub District Kerala School Kalolsavam.

3. The General Convener,Kasargod District School Kalolsavam 2010-11.

Com ainant

I

ByAdvocate.- Sri.

Respondents

12..

hese. Minorresrorng ouse,Murinjakal P.O. Kupal, Pathanamthitta,Team Captain of the (Oppana Girls) of theP.S.V.P.M. Higher Secondary School Ayravon,

.Konni, rep. by Principal Smt. Mollykutty George.

R. Lekshmana lyer and T.L. Sreeram

The District Educational Officer,Pathanamthitta.General Convener,Revenue District Kalolsavam,Pathanamthitta.


U-

\3ruwI

i

Complainant

Respondents

Complainants


: Parvathi Thampi P.S., Darsana HigherSecondary Shool, Nedumangad. rep. by herfather Padmakumaran Thampi. B. KidangayathuBenglow, Ktrthirakulam P.O.,

Vembayam, ThiruvananthaPuram.

By Advocate:- Sri. A.M. Mukthar

: .. 1. Convener, Programme Committee,District School iKalolsavom,D. E.O. Qffice, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Deputy Director of Education, Kottayam.3. General Conrieiner,

Programme Gommittee, State School Kalolsavm,

Office of the Deputy Director of Education,Kottayam

By Senior Government Pleader.ii

Comolaint No. 4812011 B

. 1. Malavika K.R., Minor, rep. by her motherRekha S.N. Saras, Cheriyakonam Meleveedu,

. Aralumoodu P.O., NeYYattinkara.2. Sruthi S.,3. KavYa ThamPi

,

4. Pamela Thomas R.S.5. Lekhmi V.S.

7. Bincy S.P.

" By Senior Government Pleader.

2.

a

1 ; i;1,.' 1;.;,,,;i'' j'\' : r, :: ;'l'i::i'

Kerat Siate KaioisavoLii 20 i 0-"i'i,

Kottyam through the Dy. Director of Education,

Kottayam.The Asst. Director of Public lnstruction,O/o DPl, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram'The Deputy Director of Education,Killippalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

t?

Complainant

Respondents

Complainants


: Parvathi Thampi P.S., Darsana HlgherSecondary Shool, Nedumangad. rep. by herfather Padmakumarbn Thampi. B. KidangayathuBenglow, Kuthirakulam P.O.,

Vembayam, ThiruvananthaPuram.

I

:

\3

By Advocate:- Sri. A.M. Mukthar ,

Kottayam.


: .. 1. Convener, Programme Committee,District School :Kalolsavom,D. E:O. Qffice, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Deputy Director of Education, Kottayam.3. Geneial Conriener,

Programme Gommittee, State School Kalolsavm,

Office of the Deputy Director of Education,

:iComnlaint No. 4812011 B

: 1. Malavika K.R., Minor, rep' by her motherRekha S.N. Saras, Cheriyakonam Meleveedu,

. Aralumoodu P.O., NeYYattinkara.2. Sruthi S.,3. Kavya ThamPi4. Pamela Thomas R.S.5. Lekhmi V.S.

;i c i; :,. -' r-r '":

7.

Pv Adrin :ir-,: - r, i

"'^-

Bincy S.P.

t:,1L,i-i F :,.,1h:;: :.:;' l,l

'' .a' t. ; -' ;-,. , , -. ,'. *. .-

Keiai $iaie Kaicrisavoiii 20 i 0-'l.i ,

Kottyam through the Dy. Director of Education,

Kottayam.The Asst. Director of Public lnstruction,O/o DPl, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram'The Deputy Director of Education,Killippalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

2.

" By Senior Government Pleader'

tr

ryl&

Complaint No.66/2011 A

comprainant . 3,xx::H,?,Yiti'r"sephcHS,Mutholy, Palai, Kottayam.

ByAdvocate:- Sri. A.M. Mukthar

j.t,

Respondents ' 1

,: 2.3

Complainants

Convener, Prog ramme Com mittee SistrictSchool Kalolsavam, Kottayarn Revdnue District,DEO Office, KottayamDeputy Director Education, Kottayam:Generat ConveqerProgramme Committee,state Kalolsavam,Office of Deputy'Director of Education,Kottayam


Complaint No. 76/2011 B

. 1. Akhila Dev. S., Minor (XUll)represented by her mother Valsala J.S.,V.S. Cottage, Edakkad,' Kulathoor,

.. Neyyattinkara.2. Alakananda N.S. (Xl)3. Renjumol T.S. (Xl)4. San(hya R.S. {Xl)5. Saranya R (Xl)

By Advocate:- Sri. Babu P Pothencode

Respondents . : :

:General Convener,

'Kerala State Kalolsavom 2010-11 ,

Kottyam through the Dy. Director of Education,Kottayam.The Asst. Director of Public lnstruction,O/o DPl, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram.The Deputy Director of Education,Killippalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

1.

2

'l 3!


l5

Complaint No. 78/2011 B .::

f\^*^l^:-^-t^ / n ' I

domplainants : 1. Rahna Jiji Reynold,D/o Jiji Reynold,Brick Fort, Vlangamuri, Neyyattinkara P.O.,Thiruvnanthapuram, Student of Xl standard M.VH.S.S. Arumannoor, Poovar P.O. and team

. represented by her mother Jlji Reynold.: . 2. Siva Ganesh S.M., S/o Sivakumar T.K.,

' .-. Tara Bhavan, Kadichal, Moonnukallinrnoodu,

Student of Xl standard,:-'YY:.":"] ^-' Dr'cil rucr

3. Sarath U.S., S/o V.R. Unikrishnan Nair, : ,, \''.'-.:.-.'';',;:.;.i-1i-l]rl].'.',,Shirdhi,Moonnukallinmood[|,.'

-i,, :,, :, NeyyattinkaraP.O.,Thiruvananthapuram,,.,. , !i; r Student of Xl standard,

!. . M.V.H.S.S. Arumannoor, Poovar P.O.

t. t;.':..Thiruvananthapulam,StudentofXlstandard,M.V. H.S.S. Arumannoor, Poovar P.O.

5. Jayakrishnan S.S., S/o Suresh Kumar N.K.,

. Uthradam Nivas, Manalivila,Neyyattinkara P.O., Thiruvananthapuram,Student of Xl standard, M.V.H.S.S,Arumannoor, Poovar P.O.

By Advocate-Sri. O-B* Harikumar

, nesponOents ,;JHigher Secondary Directorate,Thiruvananthapuram,Kerala State School Kalolsavam2010-11 heldat Kottayam. ' '

2. The Regional Deputy Director of HigherSecondiry Educatioh, Kottayam,Kerala State School Kalolsavam2010-11, , ,

tKerala State School Kalolsavam2010-11 held atKottayam

By Senior Government Pleader

t'Iil6

Complaint No. 82/2011 C :r

Complainant : Gadha p.K , (Minor) 10th student atKPRGSGHSS Kalliasseri. Rep. by her father andguardianP.K. Gopi S/o Raman Panicker,Kolakkattuvayal House, Ariyil PO.,Thaliparamba, Kannur Dist.

By Advocate:- Smt. M.R. Jayalatha I

RespondentsKeral State Kalolsavom 2010-11,Kottayam

2. General Convener,State Kerala School Kalotsavam 2010-2011,Kottayam, Office address: D.D.E. Kottayam,Kottayam District.


.. Complaint No. 88/2011 C

Complainant : Jenet James, D/o V.J. James,Vadakkayil House,Puzhakulangara,Thaliparamba P.O.,Kannur.

,,, By navccate;=€ti

Respondents . 1. Deputy Director of Education,Office of the Deputy Director of Education,Kannur.

2. .Chairman,Appeal Committee,

, .. Office of the Deputy Director of Education,Kannur.

3. General Convener,Kerala School Kalotsavam 2010-11,State Level Competition, Kottayam.

..i


t

I I'',i' , : .'.r.i. r'

Complainants : :

'-:.!,

complaint Nojg0/2011 'C, l

1. AnwarN. "r,,'2. Mshnu Vijay:3. Saheer E i:',' , :

4. SrejithA.K,); :

5. Anandhu MohanN r:,:,.'r ';

6. SaChin,C.Si..,r, r., . .1. .,.,,:. , ,. __:r

7 . Hari An'and lP, ' " '"

,' ',-' ''

B. Sreeraj R i,;, :

9. Sharik,Muhbmmed,Sr. ' ,,' '':10. lmthiydsAhammed A,{Minors):rep. ,by the

guardian qfinext friend ofAnwar.N; (TeamLeader), SiiAnoof. N,;;.lrlana Housq:Ten{hStone, Nedtmangad;tTrivandru.'; '.': ":', '

,tBy Senior Government Pleader.

'a'

- --Comptainants- : 1.'-€nijinV.R: {Minor)flTeamteader)---Std. X, Govt. H.S; Kqnjiramkulam,

i

Residing at Thiruhridaya Bhavan, Pichai,' P ezhayavila, K an"liramktrlam P.O.,

f.ie y yatiinkaic.2. Jini J. Justin,

Std-X, Govt. H.S., Kanjiramkulam.3. Dileep S.M., Std - X, Govt. H.S.,

k"niii"trulam- Representeo ov Mncent Suresh ]Babu, S/o Sabariyar, and father of the 1''complainant and being the next friend of

I , comPlainants2&3-,

By Advocate:- Smt. R. Preethakumari

It_

Respondents :

By Advocate:- Sri. Sande6p.TJ@eorge ;

1" Generdl C6hvener, ,:i: " 'i ,'Keral StateKalolsavom,20l 0-1 1,

Kottyam tlfrough the Dy. Director of Education,Kottayam. '.::2. The Asst. Director of Public lnstruction,O/o DPl, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram.

3. The Deputy;Director of Education,Killippalam; Thiruvananthapuram.

flrFtJrl

I

IB

Respondents : 1. The Deputy Director of Education, .-1r,

DD Office, Kottayam P.O., 2 ffHnf,?t'""#"Ji,?:?i::Ttr,33lllT'3ff,0, i

Kottayarh.3. General Convener,

DDE, Thiruvananthapuram.

By Senior Government Pleader. -_i


comprainant :' 1' H:l'iriiffi,iH:T3-41t1142,pNRA-e4,Kuriyathi, Manacaud P.O., Thiruvananthauram.Rep. byher father M. Sreekumar.

ByAdvocate:- Sri, S.N. Sharma and Sreekanth S

' Respondents : 1. The Director of Higher Secondary Education,Higher Secondary Directorate,Thiruvananthapuram.

2. The Regional Deputy Director of Highersecondary Education, Kottayam,Kerala State School Kalolsavam 2010-2011,Kottayam.

3. The Convener Programme Committee,.. Kerala State School Kalolsavam2010-2011,

Kottayam.

Complaint No. 120/2011 G

Complainant : lnduja Chandran, Minor,rep. by her mother Manchu Chandran,lndeevaram, Pangappara P.O.,Kariavattom, Thiruvananthapuram.


Respondents : 1. General Convener,.. Kerala State Kalolsavam 2010i1,

Kottayam through the Dy. Director of Education;Kottayam.

k/'

['mr

lq

: Z. The Asst. Director of public lnstructionl,.i..;,.,,,., ,,,_ , O/o DPl, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram.,,,i,i,:-, 3 Ih" Deput!, Director of Education,

Killippalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

By Senior Government pleader.

I Complainant .,: :-ia !'

.' . i'rii,. '.

t 1:.ii r;.,,:j ;'::ji,:.ii:,1,!,:i:::: i: i'i;.11: i..,,,il ,J.'i:'.i.-l ii.i,!,:3,;.:;-j l'i;rrr, I i." 4l.i,"j t, i:;i. i;i;:': lit:.:ljeii i'r:1i.?,r:; l.ii,1;r.l;

',-

Respondents

Complainants

ComplaintNo: d24120,11 A :' ,

Lekshmi MK., St. Mary's H,S.S., " ;; :':: ':'' :

Pattarir, Thiruvananthipuram. i"p. by her father& guardian,C.'Kesavan Nair, T.C: 4Bt6T3,Lalitha Bhavan, Ambalathuram poonthura p.O.,

1. T.$.N.;Elafath,':'ii'.:,,i, ; "':r ''r' ')r'' '

Programriteeommittd€:Convener; .

M.T. Seniihary High.School, Kottayam ' :

School Kdltilsavarii'.'. :/ :: ;'

2. M.l. Suktirharan,, ' ,":.

Deputy Dlrector of Education,Maskarakunnu, Near Fire Station,, Kottayam.

3. G. SOmanj i .: ' :

Deputy Di.rector sf Education, Killipalam, T.VM.

,,. .. t

1,a


. Complaint No. 14tr'12011 C

: 1. Mshnu Mpin, S/o Vlpinachandran Nair KA,Konnanattu House, Chengamanadu P.O.._-

standard Govt. H.S.S Mokkannoor - 683 S77and team represented by.his fatherVlpinachandran Nair KA. :

, \fi^L,^ , C " .^ ,- \.'i*;i-- i' i /

lj,;U; ir.,ri riJUie, Uiiei;y * *appalaSSeryAngamally South P.O. - 683 572,Student of std. Xl . Govt. H.S.S.Mokkannoor - 683 577.

3. Mmal N.V S/o Velayudhan N.M, Nellikai House,Azhakam P.O., Moonnampara BO,Pin - 683 577,Student of Xl Standard, Govt. H.S.S.Mokkannoor - 683 577.

z0

rl

I

l

l

l

4.

A

b.

7.

Jishnu Radhakrishnan, S/o C.P Radhakrishnan,Chembakassery House, Vappalassery P.O.,;' ,,

Angamally - 683 572, Student of Xll standardGovt. H.S.S. Mokkannoor - 683 577.Kiran K.S., S/o Shaji KA,Kavattu House, Kidangoor P.O.,Angamally, Pin - 683 572, Student of Xll, ..Govt. H.S.S. Mokkannoor - 683 577Nikhil M.V, S/o Karthu- Velayudhan,Malayamthuruthy House, Azhakam P.O., ' :

Azhakam FISAT, Pin - 683'577,',Student of Xll':standard, Govt,, H.S.S.Mokkannoor -,683 577. ' '

Nishad Ayyappan, S/o C:K.:Ayyappankutty,Choparam bil,'House,,Karu kutty,' P. O.,' N ee roli para,Pin - 683 576, Student of Xl standard, "

Govt. l-l.S.S. r'Mokkannoor - 683'577 .

Respondents :


1. The Director of Higher-Secondary Education;Kerala State School Kalolsavam 2010-2011,Thiruvananthapuram

2. The Regional Deputy director of HigherSecondary Education, Kerala State SchoolKalolsavam 201 0-2011, Kottayam.

3. The Convener, Programme Committee,Kerala State School Kalolsavam 2010-2011,Kottayam: ---- ---


\

Complainant :

Respondents . 1.



Liju Raj S., S/o Selvaraj,residing at Riju Bhavan, Das Nagar,Kunnapuzha, Thiruvananthapuram.Rep. by his father Selvaraj.

Deputy Director of Education,ThiruvananthapuramGeneral Convener,State School Kalolsavam, Kottayam.The Deputy Director of Education,Kottayam.

2.

J,

n^

u

Complaint No. 14812011 C ":'

Complainant : Neethu J.S., D/o C. Surendran residing at Sujini, *

Hfil;il r;qs id iliill?l'T : Tl,:'ff;,.

Respondents 1. Sri. Samson G,The Deputy Director of Educaiton,Chairman, Appeal Committee,Thiruvanarithapuram Revenue District SchoolKalotsavarn (Deputy Director ofThiruvananthapuram District).

2. Sri. S.K. Premachandran,The Convener, (Frogramme),

, , : Thiruvananthapuram District School Kalotsavam.: 3. The Programme Committee Convener, :

Kerala Sclrool,Kalotsavam 2011, Kottayam-


:-^ti:#

"c*

Complaint No. '15212011 A

Complainant : Mshnu R. Varma, Standard Xll,St. Joseph H.S.S., Thiruvanantllapuram,rep. by his mother Ambika Varma,Arurnana Amma Veedu,Subash Nagar, Thiruvananthaupram.

\ ByAdvocate:- Sri. A.M. Mukthar

Respondents . 1. Convener, Programme Committee,.. District School Kalolsavam,

. D.E.O. Office, Thiruvananthauram.2. DePutY Director of Education,

Kottayam3. General Convener,

" Programme Committee, State SchoolKalolsavam,Office of Deputy Director of Education,KottaYam

" By Senior Government Pleader-

Ll

.1.

e7

, Complaint No. 160/2011 A 7

Complainant : Arya Dayal, Minor,' Residing at Keechikode House,Edakkad P.O., Kannur,Rep. by her father Dayal.

By Advocate - Sri Pallichal S.K. pramod

Respondents . 1. The Deputy Director of Education, Kannur.2 f,".f R3:?J3L",3"J;rer schoor Karorsavam,Kottayam

3. State Programme Committee Convener,, ., :, , , 51"t Kerala state Level School Kalolsavam,Kottayam.


Complaint No. 164/2011E

Complainants '. 1. Jishnu G.S., rep. by his fatherP. S. Sabukumar, Erathu Veedu,Maruthoor, Neyyattinkara P.O, TVM.

2. Akshay S., S/o C. Sasikumaran,Abhishekam, Kozhaikottukonam,Para\suvaikkal P.O., TVM.

3. Arunkumar M.V.,Poovamvilakathu Mele Thattu Puthenveedu,Udiyankulangara, Amaravila P.O., TVM.

1. ntfan ASnoK, D/o ASoKan,Thiruvathira, Plamuri Puthen Veedu,

. Parassuvaikkal, Parassala P.O., TVM.' 5. AbhinayA.J., SloAjayan,Karthikalayam, Kunnathukal,

' Karakonam P.O., TVM.6. Aswin S.S., S/o D. Sreekumar,

Ayilyam, Parassuvaikkal,Parassala P.O., TVM.

7. Anunathan Pillai, J.S., S/o S. Sukumaran,Kannamvilakathu Veedu, Vyshnavam,' Vattavila P.O., TVM.

B NandhukrishnaA.M., S/o Muraleedharan Nair,Nandanam, Madan Road,Dhanuvachapuram P.O., TVM.

'' llv-_

z3

L Vishnu G.S., S/o S. Gopakumar, , -.:,

: lnjaneyam, Near Subramoniam Swami Temple, {plamoottukada p.O., TVM.

Lekshmi Vilasom, Karavur,plamoottukada p.O., TVM.

1.1 Vijayachandran C.K.,c/o Chandrasenan Nair,U

Vilaya Bhavan, Kovakkaravila,I parassuvaikkal p.O., TVM

12. Aswanth.M., S/o Madhupalan Thampi,Thripthy hut, Marutharavilakom,

j,, :, : , palavoorkonam,parassalaP.O,,TVM.t.;. , ,.-r_.:.:..

,

?,;: : ByAdvocate:- Sri. Neyyattinkara p NagarE : , *., ,,,_, ;: ..

,i ..:. ,,I DistrictKalotsavam,TvM.

Kottayam

By Senior Government Pleader.'


Complainant : Sangeeth.S., S/o Geetha,- Sangeeth Bhavan,Cheruvally Mukku, Chirayinkeezhu P.O.,

Minor rep. by his mother and guardian Geetha.

By Advocate:- Sri. Mridul John Mathew

Respondents : 1. Deputy Director of Education,Office of the Deputy Director of Education,Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Chairman, Appeal Committee Office of theDeputy Director of Education, TVM.

3^ General Convener,

i Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-2011,State Level Competition, Kottayam.

. By Senior Government Pleader.

k-

rq2,4

I

'.:,. 4

| , 'r."

i

Complaint No, 1,68/2011 B

1. Achu R. Nair,represented,Fy his father Raveendran'Nair,Vanchiyoor PO., Alamcode, Attingal.Prinjin S"P. i

Ananthujeev,S.Mahesh Krish,na BSonu M.S.Angustus S..RodriguezAdarsh PremRajagopal Rr ' ,

By Advocate:- Sr,i. Babu P P,ottlencode

.'1. The Generaf0onvener; : ' '

: , , ;:Karalla StateSchool KalolSavom 201,0.2o11,.,"'., :.,Kottayam through the Dy.:Director of'Education"

Kottayam. ' , "-2. TheAssistartt:Director of Public lnstruction,

O/o DPl, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram3. The Depi:ty Director of Ed:ucation,

Killippalam,fhiruvananthapuram,. :

By Senior Government-Pleader. i,'I

I

2.3.4.5.6.7.8.

i:rr tl'

'r.: ;

, Complainant : Pooja Hair; (Minor),

-____ ' . ,. : , . :=:_= Ren hv herli,.,othei Geelhakumari, :Kunnathuveedu, PazhaYachantha,Ponganad P.O., Killimanoor,Thiruvanathapuram.

By Advocate:- Sri. Babu P. Pothencode

Respondents . 1. The General Convener,Kerala State Kalolsavom 201 A-2011,Kottayam through the Dy. Director of Education,Kottayam..

2. The Assistant Director of Public lnstructionOio DPl, Jagathy, Thiruvananthapuram.

3. The Deputy Director of Education


Complaint No.'17012011 B

e5

.Complaint No. 1,7412011 C-:.!,

,Cornplainant'-. ,l-.. , ;: :. '.,

Prathapachandra Babu, .:). rr ' i,Slo Thankappan pllla, Father of Pr.iyankaP,residing at Fowrnami; Kar:impinpuzha P.O.,Puthoor, Kot{arakara;rKollam. :"

i

2'TheDeputyDirectorolE'ducation;.|:',-1'';;:;'1..,',:-, '.:Gcflerai Seci€tary;51"J'Kerala State School ;:,' ' ig

KalolsavamiXottaYam, ; ,r : ''.;.-

--!'. 1. Deputy DireCtor of''Education;, : : t ::!:

; Directorate 6f 'Education; Kollar{L ,' ' '

i 3. Mohamr,rlediAneesh(General'Convener),'', :::' : :,

..:''.51'tKeralaStdte.School,,Kalols?Vaffi;.:.,-...''KottaYam. i .'

,t::I

Complaint Nolr{,fl?81201{,C"".; i ;.,..:,1',. i.'

: Gargi G., (Minor), ,

Rep. by herlguardian JaYasree K.,

Raja Mlas, Vellorkunnam,Market P.O., MuvattuPuzha.

Respondents' : 1. The Programme Convener,

Kerala State School Kalolsava m 2010-2011,Kottayam

L. L,..:1;r:.y Li;,t:::;r li Iii.;caticti,Ernakulam.

3. General Coordinator,Kerala State School Kalotsavam 2010-2011,Kottayam.

Government Pleader. :By Sen ior't I

ti! I

tlI

i(U---

'. 1,. r''i',.111,., r"'i'. i1r.- 1 11"'rl'j l i ;..

r: :?g)-lFPleiPa,l!

;;'i,,,,,

il:ltll;:,';:t;i. i'r.i.-t,,'"''

r O i::' i-: i: i i:] i !,: i i: : i rlit i rii,'ReSpOndent,rli.' l; ;r: .,1, ; ;'..'.i, i-: i '

:r:. :1, .i .:.;; i ..;lr',: .,..r.., .. -::' . ,i,,.

i..: ti*.:",r:,{.i1. . i :

:::i:-!*'3ffi:l;Ii.i-,* ", ;'' "'

ByAdvocate.- Sri..PS. Fradeesh,Rai ', , :'

; '- Tha ,1A;^-^t iiri : .: , : The General eonvbt'1of,, :, , ,, '

, , : ,, (Deputy Direetorof 'Education),- .

BySeniorGoveinmentFteader.]iiii;'.'.,::..:':''

?,6

ComplaintNo, 1E0t20il C' :,.t, -:'!'

: , Havis Basheer, The Captain, Dafmutt team;Govt. B.H.S.S': Thycaud.

Complaint Nq:'18212011 A ,, , - :, ,

'. .;j,HeeraThulasijiD/o Thulaseedharan,Filla;""'';":,', .residing at Geetha Bhavan,lleenathuseri,, :

Kavanad P.Oj'; Sakthikulangara, Kollam, :'

Minor rep. byilier fathera.ndguardian. , :, ri l

ThulaseedharanPillai.'

By Advocate.' Smt. K:S. Leena Chand

: 1. Deputy Directorof Educat'ion, : , '.':"'":'"t"'"Office of the Dbputy Directbr of rEducation, ,

Thiruvananthapuram2. Chairman, Appeal Comrnittee,

O/o Deputy Dir:ector of Education,Thiruvananthapuram.

- =:= "'f CgnPKerala Schoo! Kalolsavam 2A10-2011,State Level Competition, Kottayam.


Complainant


: Mithula K.P., Minor,rep. by her mother Latha P., residing atKizhake Puthenveettil,ldimuzhikkal, Post CHelembra,Malappuram District - 673 634.

ByAdvocate:- Sri. Dani J. Paul

7,7

1 The General Convener,Vengara Sub District School Kalotsavam2010-11, and the Assistant Education Officer,Vengara Sub'bistrict Malappuram District.

2. The District Education Officer, Tirur EducationalDistrict, Malappuram.

3 The General Convener,Malappuram'Di strict school Kalotsavam2010-2011, Kottayam District, Kottayam


.Complaint No. 188/2011 A ,

: Anjali Menon,A.T., Minor, : i

Residing atTh'rikktta, Nefiayam P.O., - 'r- ::

Thiruvananthapur:am,, represented'by her fatherAnil Menon. :

r']t

Respondents

;, ;,r ,l9offiPlainant

+

+

z.:t:.

By Advocate:-

Respondents :

Sri. P.S. Dinesh

The Deputy Director of Education,Thiruvananthapuram.The General Convener, Programme Committee,Kerala State Kalolsavam, Higher secondaryLevel, Kottayam.The Convener, Programme Committee,Kerala State l(alolsavam, Higher SecondaryLevel, Kottayam

1.

2.

3.

Complainant

.l

By Advocate:

Respondents :

by her Mother Beena. J.

Sri. O.B. Harikumar

1. The Director of Higher Secondary Education,H igher Secondary Directorate,Thiruvananthapuram

"L './t,,//



: Subi P.8., D/o Beena J.Pushpa Vihar, Mangalathukonam'Kattachalkuzhi P.O., Balaramapuram, Student of- Xl Standard of Govt. Higher Secondary SchoolN eyyatti n kara, Th i ruva na nth a puram represented

a

t:

AB

2. The Regional Deputy Director of Higher,Secondary Education, Kottayam,Kerala State School Kalolsavam 2010-11 ,

Kttayam.3. The Convener Programme Committee,

Kerala State School Kalolsavam 2010-11,Kttayam.


Complainants

IComptaint No. 194/2011 B

: 1. Chintu Jacob2. Arya V. Nair3. Minnu Sebastian4. Renya Aneendran5. Nimisha C.A,6. _Gouthami M.7. Anu Joy

Students in St. Mary's G.H.S.S., Cherthla, andminors represented by first complainant's motherSheela Jacob, Alanthara House, EzhupunnaSouth P.O., Cherthala.

ByAdvocate:- Smt. M.R. Jayalatha

Respondents : . 1. General Convener,' Programme Committee, State Kerala SchoolKalolsavam 2010-2011, Office of the Dy. Directorof Education, Kottayam.

Kottayam District.


Complainants


: 1. Reshma K.P. Krishnaprabha2. Akhila Raj3. Akhila Mohan4. Surya5. Aswathi Ganga' 6. Sanooja.P.7. MiniB. Sruthi M.P and

,t|:ir.s!frsfffiitr1i' 1, :ii : {lffiffi ff iiry;".1,1;111,'p, fll::li{$iril:$ll{1qlllfxr'1.i{' .: rr. rr1s. ' { ili I r! r I riil

.:t,

zq

By Advocate:- Sri.

Najmathu Munvira,Bindu S. Nair. Kizhakepattathu House,Kavalapara P.O., Karackad, Shornoor,Palakad, rep. by Bindu S. Nair, motherof the first complainant.

Bijily Joseph

The Deputy Director of Education,Palakad.

The Programrne Committee Convener,51't Kerala School Kalolsavam,Reception Committee Office of the aboveKalolsavam, Kottayam.

The General Convener,51"t Kerala School Kalolsavam,Reception Committee Office of the aboveKalolsavam, Kottayam.

Respondents


Complainant


: Sooraj.S., Minor,' Rep. by his next friend and brother SubeeshMuppathupara, Chullickkal, Cochin.

Respondents 1. The Programme Convener,Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-11,Kottayam.

2.. Deputy Director of Education,Alapuzha.

3. General Coordinator,Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-11 ,

, Kottayam.


q

1,

2.

3.

lz'--'--

l!" "'!!!II

Complainant :

BY Advocate

Respondents

Gomplainant

KottaYam. '

By Senior Government Pleader;

By Advocate'- Deepak. J.M.

Complaint No. 202/2011 C -!,l

Mithun . P.' Minor,ReP. bY his guardian Manoi Kumar' : :

Shagholi' Kuttimakal,Thiruvagad, Thalassery

- Sri. SandeeP T George

. 1. The Programme Convener,Kerala dcnoot Kalolsavam 2010-11'

KottaYam

2. Deputy Director of Educati6n' Kannur'

3. General Coordinator, ' ' 'r'

Kerala School Kalolsavam lQl0-11'

ComPlaint No. 204/20{1'C

: Lalu Varghese, (father of Jeena arghese)

Anju Bhivan, Channapetta' Pathanapuram'

Kollam torleena Varghese & team members

Aswathy S, Rosamml C13cko' Arthy Sugunan'

Gopika G.,'Prathibha M' Nair' Jisha T' Alex'

Sri.

Respondents 1. The Deputy Director of Education'

Directorate of Education' Kollam'

2. The Deputy Director of Education'

Generai Secretary, 51" Kerala School

Kalolsavam, KottaYam

3. Mohammed Aneesh (General Convener)'

. -'

Stli Kuttta School Kalolsavam' Kottayam'

By Senior Government Pleader'

'7; ---1 {r/

3l

Complaint No. 206/2911 C -:'l

Complainants : 1. Aswathi R. Nair (Minor) by,

Manoj Kumar T.O, Thekkedathu House,

2 Greeshma G Krishna. 3. Nibisha Babur i fi,?illiJ,,)j''6. Jothis G Ktimar,7 . Krisnapriya. K.

ByAdvocate:- Sri. S. Narayanan Nair

Respondents '. 1. General Convener,.,., ,, . ;1 ,.,,.,, : District Kalolsavam, Pathanamthitta.', ' , ': 2. The Deputy Director of Education,

Pathanamthitta District.

- 3. The General Convener,State School Kalolsavam,C/o Education Department, Kottayam.


{,lA iComplaint No. 218/2011 A

Complainants : 1. Sajitha Sasikumar, rep. by her mother SuvarnaSasikumar residing at Sree Bhavan,Mathilbhagom P.O:, Thiruvalla.

Pulickaparambil House, Kulakkadavu,Thiruvalla.,3. Geethu R. Nair, rep. by her father Rajasekharan

Nair, Santha Sadan, Mathilbhagom P.O.,

f h;'it'.,1!l:.:. .-iri--; ;r: i '.,,, _,

: i, "::i::' -r:-.:;:, i*f by hef fathef C.lt;.3:'ilg,:, L ;-:.;;iiaiay',, i.-icuse, Kuttoor P.O.,

l-hiruvalla.5. Jincy Joshua, rep. by her father C-C. Joshua,

. th"ryathumootil Jins Villa, Venpala P.O.,

f hiruvalla.6. Dana K. Oomnren, rep. by her father Oomman K.

George, Cochumalipurathu House,Kizhakumbhagom, Niranam.

ti -t'4.--'

3Z

7. Aiswarya Anil Kumar, rep. by her mothbi ValsalaAnilkumar, Anusree, Mammamkarachira,Kavumbhagom P.O.,

B. Chippy John, rep. by her father V.A. John,Vettikombil Jerry Bhavan, Thalavady P.O.,Alapuzha.

9. Manju Das, rep. by her father Mohan Das,Moonamthara House, Alumthuruthy P.O.,

. Vengal, Thiruvalla.10. Anita Anna Varughese, rep. by her father K.V.

Varghese, Kilaparambil House, NedumbarathKottayam Road, Mathilbhago*.

By Advocate:- Sri. Praveen.P

Respondents : 1. General Convener,Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-1 1,

Kottayam through Dy. Director of Education,Kottayam.The Asst. Director of Public lnstruction,Office of the DPl, Trivandrum.The Deputy Director of Education,Killipalam, Trivandrum.


Complaint No. 22012011 A

Complainant : Krishnendu. V., D/o Valsalakumari L,

Manikanteswaram P.O.,

2.

3.

Krishnapuri,

By Advocate:

Respondents .

antnapuram.Student of Xll standard, Govt. Vocationat HigherSecondary School, Vattiyoorkavu,Thiruvananthapuram represented by her motherValsalakumari.L.

Sri. O.B. Harikumar

The Director of Higher Secondary Education,Higher Secondary Directorate'Thiruvananthapuram.The Regional Deputy Director of HigherSecondary Education, Kottayam,Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-11 ,

held at Kottayam.

1.

2.

3.-'

33

3. The Convener Programme Committee.'r, ;.i,

Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-11, rheld at Kottayam


Complaint No.,22212011 B

Complainants . l. Nayanthara S.S.,,D/o G.S. Sreekumar,Ujjayini, Thottakkadu P.O.,Kallambalam, Student of X std. Sr. ElizabethJoel, CSIEMHSS, Attingal, rep. by her fatherG.S. Sreekumar.Chitra J.J., D/o P. Jayakumar, Std. X,Sr. Elizabeth' Joel; CSIEMHSS,Sreevlas, Kollarnpuzha, Attingal.RahulA.R.; S.o V. Anilkurnar Std. lX,

Sr. Elizabeth Joel, CSIEMHSS,Pranavam, iWater Supply, Road,V'al iyakunn u ; Atting al.Sradha. S.,'D/o S.Sunil Raj, Std. Vlll,Sr. Elizabeth Joel, CSIEMHSS.Sravanam, .Kadarrila, Vanchiyoor PO.,Attingal.Vigneesh Ajay, D/o Ajayakumar S.,Std. Vlll, Sr. Elizabeth Joel, CSIEIIHSS,Ajay Bhavan, T.B. Junction, Attingal.Unnikrishnan Nair. R.,S/o Reghunathan Nair R.,'Std.

Vlll, Sr. Elizabeth Joel, CSIEM!-{SSPooram, Veltoorkona

--

Sr. Elizabeth Joel, CSIEM|{SS,S.S. Bhavan, Karithalakal, Kariyil, Attingal.

Respondents . 1. The Director of Higher Secondary Education,Joint General Co-orcjinater, Thiruvananthapuiam.The Regiona! Deputy Director of HigherSecondary ECucation, Kottayam,Kerala Schoci Kalolsavam 2010-11, Kottayarn.The Genera! Gon,.iener, Programme Committee,Kerah School Kalclsavam 2010-"i1 . Kottaya,n.

By Senicr Governinent Pleader.

2.

3.

4.

'q

6

J

Complainants

Respondents

3+

Complaint No. 22612011 B -.r

Nandu M.R., Bth Std.Archana P. Unnithan, gth Std.Nazeeb N., Bth Std.Vineesh B, 1Oth Std.Sruthy P B. Bth Std.Swathy Krishnan R.S., gth Std.Akhshitha Suresh, gth Std.Anandu Mohan, Bth Std. of S.M.H.S., Kottara,Kollam (Minors) rep; by the father of the 1'tcomplainant, Manoj Kumar, Mohana Mlasam,Kottara, Meyannoor P.O,, Kollam Dist.

1-

2.3.4.5

6.7.B

By Advocate:. Sri. R. Ram Mohan

: 1. The Deputy Director of Education, Kollam.2. The Deputy Director of public lnstruction,

D. P. 1., Thiruvananthapuram.3. The General Convener, programme Committee,

Kerala School Kalolsavam, High School General,Kottayam.

4. The Convener, Programme Committee,Kerala School Kalolsavam, High School General,Kottayam.

By Senior Government Fleader.


Respondents

Rep. by her Guardian M.R. Ajith Kumar,Mavelil House, Thrikkalathoor P.O.,Muvattupuzha, Ernakulam.

By Advocate.- Sri..Sandeep T. George

. 1. The Programme Convener,Kerala School Kalolsavam, Kottayam.

2. Deputy Director of Education,Malappuram.

3. GeneralCoordinator,Kerala School Kalolsavam, Kottayam.

" By Senior Government Pleader.v

35

Complainants

Complaint No. 230/2011 B -:r,

1 Deepak Mohan, S/o T.G. Mohanan, minor,rep. by his father T.G. Mohanan, S/o Gopalan,Thazhathemalayil House, Udumannoor P O

'

Thodupuzha, ldukki, as team leader.2 Ansndavishnu P Mohan, S/o P.P. Mohanan,

Parayil House, Manakkad P.p., Thodupuzha,Minor, rep. by his father PP. Mohanan, S/oParanT€swaran, Parayil House, Manakkad PO.,Thodupuzha, ldukki.

3. Abhinand Krishna P Mohan, S/o P.P. Mohanan,Parayil House, Manakkad P.O., THodupuzha,Minoi, rep.:by his father P.P. Mohanan, S/o

Parameswaran.4. Amala Aney T'hankachan, Dlo Thankachan F

M ichael, Puliyamma,ckal,House, Thodu puzha

- P.O., Olamaltam, Minor, rep. by his fatherThankacha'n Michael S/o Michael.

5. Anjaly Benny, D/o Benny K.V., Konickal House,

Thodupuzha P.O., Olamattom, Minor, rep. by his

father Benny K.V.

6. Jissmol Jossy, D/o Jossy M, Velacheril House,

Kalayanthani P.O., Thodupuzha, Minor, rep' byhis father Jossy M., S/o Mathew V.J.

7. Anju Anil, D/o Anilkumar M.V., Anil Nivas House,

Puthupariyaram P.O., THodupuzha, Minor, rep'

by his father Anilkumar M.V.

ByAdvocate:- Sri. J.C. StePhenson..

Respondents '. 1. The General Convener,District Kalolsavam, Thodupuzha, ldukki.

2. The Deputy Director,,i;.,-t i-i i:' iJ :, aj i-' f] ::,' ii l ilrlt i' r-; 1. l' l ;'j, : l', :. i-; a, l d U kki.

3. The General Convener,State Kalolsavam, KottaYam.


1?---

36


Complainants . 1. Meera Simon (Team leader)New HSS Nellimoodu Higher Secondary School,TVPM.

2 Athira V.J Nair,New HSS, Nellimoodu,

I3. Raziya R ,

New HSS, Nellimoodu.

4. Shibina M.,New HSS, Nellimoodu.

5. Sruthi S, Saseendran,New HSS, Nellimoodu.

6. Sreelekshmi S.8.,New HSS, Nellimoodu.

7. Vaishnavi V.G.,New HSS, Nellimoodu.

8. Ganga Suresh K.,New HSS, Nellimoodu.

9. Vishnu Priya.V.,New HSS, Nellimoodu.

10. Silpa 1.R.,New HSS, Nellimoodu.

By Advocate:- Sri. Poonthura G. Soman

Respondents : 1. The Deputy Director of Education,Thiruvananthapuram.

2. The Stage Convener,Kerala School Kalolsavam, TVM.

. 3. Convener of Programme Committee,(State Level) KottaYam


37


II

Complainants . 1. Roshni Mohanan, Minor,D/o Mohanan C.K.,

2. Nikhila V.P., Std. X

3. Ashma T, Std.X

4. Athira Baby Std. X

5. Akasa Roy, Std. X

6. Soorya Unnikrishnan. M.V., Std. Xl &

: '. 7. Cinto Kanth rep. by 1't complainant's fatherMohanan. C.K., Chrukudilil house,

Ponmundam, Vailathur, Malappuram.

ByAdvocate:- Sri. P. Santhosh Kumar

Respondents : 1. The Deputy Director of Education,

i Directorate of Education, Malappuram.

2. The General Convener,51't Kerala State School Kalolsavam, Kottayam.

('-"''

ZB


Complainants : 1. Aswin Sachukumar represented by _..'

father / grardian Sachukumar,S/o Iftishnan , Krishna Nivas,Nadakavu, Akdthethara,Palakkad - 678 008.

, 2. Anoop 3. Sujith4. Nazeer 5. Suraj

: 6. Akhil 7. ShanshadB. Sidharth Raju B. Hgoeef10. Nizamudeen

By Advocate :- V. Subhash

. . , ,,.Respond€rrt i,,, I,, The General Convenor, Programme l

.;,,,, , .,. ,t., r r : . ;,,-, , Committge, 51". Statg School

.r, r,..-,'.,: -, i,;..,',: . Kalolsavartl 20LO'L1,MTSeminary'l .:--:: ':..' " HigherSecondarySchool,Kottayam

' By Senior Government Pleader

,t ,i Complaint No. 2388011 C

Complainants : 1.. Akhila.KA., D/o Vasudevan,11ft Standaid Student, St. Joseph HSS,Kalady Pravanan Kunnamangalam,Wayanad PO., Nallornadu, WaYanadDistrict (represented by Guardian

Mananthavady, Wayanad District).

2. Febin Mathew, 12s Standard, St. Joseph HSS, Kalady

N{ananthavady, Wayanad District.

3. Ashwin Malu, 12u StandardSt. Joseph HSS, KaladyMananthavady, Wayanad District

4. Aiswaryamol, L1s StandardSt. Joseph HSS, KaladyMananthar,,ady, Wayanad Disfrict.

i Li-'

'il

3q

5. Shintu Sebastian, 11'n StandardSt. Joseph HSS, KaladyMananthavady, Wayanad District.

By Advocate :- B.S. Prasad Gandhi

Respondents : 1. The General Convenor,The Depuly Director of Education,

, Wayanad.

2. The General Convenor of ProgrammeCommittee, State SchoolKalolsavam 20L0-1,1, MT SeminaryHigher Secondary School, Kottayam.


Complainant

Complaint No. 24212O11 A

: Arya.S (Minor) PIus 1,St. Chrysostum GHS, Nellimooduresiding at AswathY, Peringammala,

. Kaltiyoor PO, Thiruvananthapuram.tep.esettted by her mother Sathy devi, : '

D/o Janaki Amma. , i

By Advocate :- Manju. T

Respondent: 1. The Deputy Director of Education,DD Office, Kottayam PO.

Commitlee, State School KalolsavamPolice Ground, Kottayam.

3. General Convener, DDE,' liriruvananthapuram.

By Senior Goveinment Pleader

'I

rl

I

i

V

Complainant. :

+0


Krithi Krishna, represented by r ' ''tlathakumari, Mother of Keerthi Krishna,Otaplakkal Veedu, Vallikeezhu,Kavanadu P.O., Kollam.

Cherinniyoor P Sasidharan Nair

i.

By Advocate :- Sri.

Respondents : . : 1.i,., l

The General,Convenor, '' "."" ' r' '

Kerala School Kalolsavam 20L0 - 2AtL,And Addl. DPI, Thiruvananthapuram(at Kottayam).

The .Convenei, , Programme '

Committee, Kerala .School Kalolsavam2010 -2Ol1,,Kottayam. ,

Dy.DirectorofEducation, Kottayam.

, By Senior Government Pleader

. .i t , :: " , Complaint No. 24612OI- 1 A

Complainant: : i.. Parvathy. C ' 2. Anjali K.V.

5. Arya C 6. Vidya K7. Jeena K B. Sithara M

?a"*f'l1$S"f"," ro "1'3

*i*'.THlX-fr"'ffffi :r"H,'ffi ';:""#J"'ffi '8rTff ;-

, = ,, .,,,...., is&iet)-ByAdvocate :- Sri. Abdul ShuklrurAraf&al

Respondent: 1. The General Convenor, ProgrrammeCommitLee, State Kerala SchoolKalolsavam, Office of the Deputy Directorof Education, Kottayam District.

2. Deputy Director of Education,Kotlayam District.

3. The General Convener, ProgrrammeCommitlee, Revenue District SchoolKalolsavam, Malappuram.


2.

3.

\ _-/'./-2--'

j j:t-i: iii. :.1 lrlf :ll

Complainant ., : j, :

i.

Compleinant'':. ::-;.,',,.::'

By Advocate :-

Respondents :

Compla.int No. 248/2O11 A

K Santhcsh, S/o M R Viswanathan Naii,Hill Villa, Angadipuram, Cherykaparamb,a,

t

- I li

illllrilrti itj__ . 1 : lil:: ., L]::l:;l lil::r Tl

-t

_tI

I

i

4l

1

3MalappuraM.

, By Advocate :- Sri. Cherinniyoor P Sasidharan Nair

Respondents , r : 1. The Deputy Director of Education," ' .

..'

. 2. tne Deputy'Director of Education,

. ;,. School Kalolsavam, Kottayam.

.)J.,,;,):t. ... Mohammed Aneesh (General Convener),

51* Kerala State School Kalolsavam, ' ,'

Kotbayam., ,'

By Seniorr:Government Pleader

i'.l4;J'

I51ira

.t 'n;'!. ''

a

ComplaintNp.25Ol 0L1A

P. Mohanan, S/o Late Chinnan,' ' '

residing at Naduvilpurakkal Housie,Cherattukuzhi, Ernadu Ta]uk,Malappuram

Sri. DeepakJ M

1. The Deputy Director of Edeucation,

'.!

:,

2. The Deputy Director of Education,General Secretary, 51"'t Kerala State

chool Kalolsavam, KoLtaYam.

3. Mohammed Aneesh (General Convener),31't Kerala Siate School Kalolsavam,Kotlayam.


@-'1'

4?"

Complaint No. 254/2O11 B -.7

Cornplainants : i. ThomasJames (Minor) representedby his fatherJames, Njattuthttiyil House,Neendoor PO, Kottayam.

2. Nithin Mohan, S/o Mohan,Kolbuparambil, Kallara South PO,

; 3. Sreejith Vijayachandran,i : S/o Vijayachandran, Lekshmi Nivas,

Neendoor PO, Kottayam.

4. Sajin Cyriac, S/o Cyriac,: :: .: .. , Ozhukayil Houss, Athirampuzha PO,r,{, Kotbayam.

' . , 5. Silpa S Mohan , Dlo Sasidharan," Nandavanan House, Kallara South PO,

Kotbayam.

m:#*liiliiil'oo,,u:*"*'Neendoor PO, Kottayam.

7. Linet Lukose, D/o Lukose,Andoor House, Neendoor PO, Kottayam

B. Reshma S., D/o Sudarsanan,. Sudarsana Bhavan, Kallara South PO,

--

' .' '. 9. Neethumol.K.S., D/o SudarsananKothrngal, Perumthurathu, Kallara,Kolbayam.

:: 10. Greeshma Manoj, Purathuvahyll House,Kapikkad PO, Kaduthuruthi.

By Advocate :- Sri. Cherinniyoor P Sasidaran Nair,,4

Respondents : L. The General Convener,Kerala State School Kalolsavam2010 - 11, Kotbayam through the Dy.Director of Education, KoLtayam.

i\.,ig/'\. L-'

Complainant :

:-.

l- ':: ' - t

Respondents

4z

2. 'The Assistant Director of PublicInstmction, O/o D.P.I., JagathY,ThiruvananthaPuram.

3. The DePutY Director of Educabon,Killippalam, Thiruvananthapuram'


Complaint No. 256/2O11 B

Naufal Sadiq. N.K., S/o Abbas.N'K',residing at NeYYathur Kozhissery,Ponmala, Ponmala P-O.Chappanangadi village, Tirur Taluk,Malappuram.

I ' r,r, ,,1

4'-g

By Advocate :- Sri. DeePakJ M

: 1,. The Deputy Director of Edeucation'Directolate of Education, Malappuram'

2. The Deputy Director of Education'General Secretary, 51't Kerala State

School Kalolsavam, KotlaYam'

3. Mohammed Aneesh (General Convener)'51'* Kerala State School Kalolsavam'KottaYam-


2.3.

1.5.6.

7.

Geethu SJ., studYing in L2&

Parvathy Sekhar studYing instandardl2.A

standardnestrml M Nair studying in 11s standardArya P V, studYing in 11s standardrrf6ti"u ntsa piut,-studyrng in l"2s

standard andDevika V studying in L1s standardof Carmel English Medium HSS''Vazhuthaca,rd, T'ltituvanan thap uram ali

are minors, represented bv the father of

T<,-tt '.

+A-

the L't complainant, Jayachandranresiding at "Harisree", Edappazhinji,Thriuvananthapuram District. '-:!'

By Advocate :- Smt. Deepa Satheesh

Respondents :

Complainant

The General Convener, PrograrnmeCommitfee, Kerala State Kalolsavam,High School General, Kottayam.

The,Convener, Programme Committee,Kerala State Kalolsavam,High School General, KoLbayam.

1. The Deputy Director of Education,Kollarn.


Complaint No. 264/2O11 C

Athira Uthaman, D I o Vasanthakumari,(minor), "Thiruvathira", Karimpinkuzhi,Puthoor PO., Kottarakkara, KollamDistrict, represented by her motherSmt. R Vasanthalnrmari residing at" Thinrvathira ", Karimpinku zhi,Puthoor PO., Kottarakkara, KollamDistrict,

2.

3.

Respondents 1.

2.

The General Convener, ProgrammeCommittee, 51't State SchoolKalolsavam 201 0-201 1", Kottayam,Kerala State.

The Deputy Director of Edeucation,Kollam.


+5

Complaint No. 266/2Ol-l- C; .+

1. Akshaya Das, D/o Sivadasan,represented through his fatherSri. Sivadasan, Puthan house colony,Vallangy, Nemmara, Palakhad District.

Complainarts

Respondent:-.' ,.'r' .1 , .. i

3. Aswin5. Rohith7. Jenson M Saju

The Deputy Director of Educatio&General Convenet -Palaklcad RavenueDistrict Kerala School KalotsavQA1.0-2011), KottaYam Office of theDeputy Director (Edeucation), CivilStation, Patakkad.

2. Shake Babti4. Jarshan IGran6. Vineetha

By Advocate :- Sri. George Poonthottam


: Ramu Radhakishnan, minorrepresented by his father Radhalrishnan,TC 91L937 (1), Ashramam Lane,' Sasthamangalam, Thiruvananthapuram'

' ComPlainant

Respondents : 1. The General Convener, Kerala StateSchool Kalotsavam 2010-1 1-, Kottayam'

2. The Assistant Director of PublicI :, r-.:ii-li l:i,.- .-,. t]:'; ii.rll'.-1 e.,;:i.i:r-, TIIM'

3. The Deputy Director of Education,Killipp ala':::,'i'hiruvananthapuram'

By Senior Governrnent Pleader

Complainant :

Respondent:

Complainants

+6

Complaint No. 27Ol2O1-1, C

Sherin. MSurabhiAkhila. H

Namitha.P, D/o S B Vinod Kumar,represented through her fatherSri. Sg Vinod Kumar, Near Mullakkal,Vannur, Alathur, Palakkad District.

By Advocate :- Sr1. George Poonthottam

- The DePutY Director of Education,. General Convener, Palakkad Ravenue,

District Kerala School Kalotsav(2010-2011), Office of the DePutYDirector (Edeucation), Civil Station,

- Prllaklcad.'



1 Fathima Rizwana represented bYKJ Sulaiman, PalliPPuram House,Punjakode, Manjalur PO.,Alathur, Palaklcad District.

2.4.6.&:10.

3. Praseetha5. Santhosh7. Greeshma. K

Drishya

By Advocate :- Sri. George Poonthottam

By Senior Govefnment Pleader

11. ncy

Respondent: The General Convener, PalakkadRavenue District Kera]a SchoolKalotsav (2010-201t), Office of theDeputy Director (Education), Civil Station,Palakkad.

I

i-\*;/; t.i: t t ,..j.r .' rq; ., { j I .'!

r, ::i; j'i i r.: { j,lht :ir'r: t1'l l, i:,iS iif Lhr:, :.

i, il"irl.ilt,(l i;i 3 n,' :AI'li.-';ii<ll.r -

,.::,, r :l.t.j.i \i,,,1.:1.:ri.,il.li 'lI

',r.] i 1.'::1'r"1r''

.-:i;rtr:,:ill:!i-j:ir*r,Sesi*xldentt::-:ii';ttti I",e;iiii Sicf',ri-;l .

,.1.r.;{).1{l: ; l.'}ti:i:,',-i,{ i i,'r, i:;f:1,,1)1'. iF;tiii,-:..i]:ifilii,,',

;-:. i:;;l ;.:.!, :: .r,,

Complain't Nori274/20L 1 A

1 Gokull'G:, S/o,S Gopinrith0nfii:;:lrii-*i:tirepreseuted'thtough.'his: fatherr., :,Sri. S Gopinatlran,,,',Anb&di,'', .,PuthilHnkasr: PO ;, Alatlur,Palakltad EiStrict.

Blju Salin ',;i'lVishnu Rbvidiib+'r'ii: i i' :

SundardaS",.l.t.,,:: :

Sujin ;,1i.r; :,':

Mithun PraQear:r:;r:i"ia:";':

VigneSh:irlr::li] ;-i':,;.' ;'

,it

-f 2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

il

,:i..

-':

l.) :l''.1 i

L .il

.\-,i By Senior Government :Pleader


gr'represented through her fatherSri. E.P. Varghese. Emprayil House,Melarcode PO., Palakkad District.

By Advocate :- Sri.

Respondent:

The G6ner6lfonv'ener''PalaEkad':ir" i:t:i':'i i

Revenhe,DisfiriitKerala,.'School,, " i,,Kalotsiivi(2ffiO-t0tr 1);': Office of ttre'': '

Depu$iDj@ton(fducation);,, :, .

Civil Statiof,;Palakkad; r.,,'

George Poonthottam

The Deputy Director of Education,General Convener, PalakkadRavenue District Kerala SchoolKalotsav (2010-2011), Office of theDeputy Director (Educadon), Civil Station,P31akkad.

" By Senior Government Pleader

LO.-t L,

--t-!-a lt^ FtF al t-t'a l t AComplaint No. 27812011 A'', . Complainants ' : Ansilin M. Saju, D/o MJ. Saju,, rI i. , . ' represented through her father

,;,,.,,,i ,: ;.i r,..' . Sri.MJ.Saju,MankuzhryllytlHouse,. :

, , :' Pullode, Puthiyankam PO., l

,, : Alathur, Palakkad District.

' ; lrl^nrnnDnnnflrn#lamBy Advocate :- Sri. George Poonthottam

, . , Respondent: , : The Deputy DireCtor of Education; '

'. ,:, General Convener, Palakkadi.,:

: ; ,,) ,. ., Kalotsav(2010-2011), Officeofthe.,: ,i:: :i :, :;. . ..' . DeputyDirector(Education);CivilStation,

Palakkad'

By Senior Government Pleader : :

' Complainants : ', : : 1. A+qha Antony, Minor, Residing at 'i " '

. ji : :., ' Team Captain of the Margam Kali (Girls)

. :.. , ,,r ,, of the S.S.V. H.S.S., Chirayinkeezhu: .,

Antony Peter.

2. Anju Viyaj, Dlo Roja VijaYakumar,Thottathil Veedu, Sarkara,Chirayinkeezhu.

3. AswathyJ.S., D/o Jayasree,Chaithram, Kattapparambu,Vanchiyoor P.O., Alamcode, Attingal.

4. . Sabari Chandran, Dlo BeenachandranThinchirrikonam, Alamcode PO, Attingal.

5. Aiswarya P Nair, D/o Prameela P Nair,Aiswarya, Kizhuvilam P.O., Mamam,

' Attingal.

6. Athira Sudarsanan, D/o Rema,Dharsana, Altharamoodu PO.,Alamcode-

-(\-

tz

+q

7 . Unnimay, Dlo Vasundhara Devi,Velamkonathu Veedu, ThanchoorkonamAvanavancherry PO., Attingal-

Sri. O.B. Harikumar

1. The Director of Higher SecondaryEducation, Higher Secondary Directorate'ThiruvananthaPuram-,

. 2. ahe Regional Depufy Director of Higher' Secondary Education, KottaYffirKerala School Kalolsavam 2010-L1,KotbaYam .

3. The Convenor, Programme Committee'Kerala School Kalolsavam 20LA-77,Held at KottaYam .


Nidhin Mohan represented by his fatherMohan Das M S, Residing at Mattakatu

' Pararnbil House, Chingavanam PO,

Polachira, KottaYam.

Sri. P. Praveen

I

ni.

By Advocate

Respondents :

Complainant

1

l

tI

The General Convener, Kera]a School

through DY. Director of Education,KottaYam.

.-r'l l;; l::.

3. The Prognamme Co ordinator,- Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010 - 20lL'

. KotLaYam.


k-t'

li.nl!filntlmltiliFllrrr"'rifl1rrl rJr, rrrynri 'r"

-r '\. rrru.

Complainant

By Advocdte :-

Respondents' :

50

Complaint No. 284/201,1 B

Thayee ltishna.K.K. (Minor)Seraphic CGHS Peringotbukara,PO Kizhakkumuri, Trichur, representedby her father / GuardianKrishnakumar.K.G

Sri. G.K. Sudheer

. 1. The Chainnan, APPeal Committee,Office of the DD of Education, Trichur'

2. The General Convener / ADPI,Kerala State School KalolsavamDirectorate of Public Insfructions,ThiruvananthaPuram.


Complainant :

Complaint No' 2BB/2O1I- B

Mar[in Vincent, Minor Represented by his

father Vincent AntonY, Palakulam,' Manacaud, KottaYarn.

By Advocate :- Sri. Surin George IPe

Respondents : 1.. The Deputy Director of Education,Kott'aYam

Kottayam.

3. The Chairrnan, APPeal CommiLtee,Kotbayam Revenue District KeralaSchool Kalolsavam 2010 - 11-

4. The General Convener,' Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010 - 11

(to be held at KottaYam).


5l

Complainants

Complaint No. 292/2O11 A

Aleena.A., Dlo Ramachandran, Std. IX,residing at Vallikandathil, Melpadam PO,Mannar, Alapuzha District, NSGHSMannar, represented by fatherP.C. Ramachandran

Aiswarya.C.S., D/o N ChandrasekharanNair, Std. IX, NSGHS Mannar,residing at Lavanya, Kurathicadu,Mannar PO, Alapuzha District.

Priyanka S Nair, D/o Prasannakumar Nair,Std. IX, NSGHS Mannar, residing atGreeshma, Kurathicadu,Mannar PO, Alapuzha District.

Thasni.T, D/o,Thajudeen,Std. X, NSGH,S Mantnar,residing at Thasni Manzil,VishavarsserikkaraMannar PO, Alapuzha District,

Praseetha N Nair, D/o Narayanan Nair,Std. L NSGHS Mannar,residing at Kovilakathu TharaYil,Kullemperoor PO, Mannar,Alapuzha District.

Sona R Pillai, D/o Omanakuttan Pillai,Std. IX, NSGHS Mannar,

1_

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

B.

9.

EramathoorMannar, Alapuzha Dis

Praveena Muraleedharan,D/o Muraleedharan, Std. IX, NSGHSMannar, residing at DhaaYa Bhavan,Kurathicadu,Mannar, Alapuzha District.

Athira A Vimal, D/o Vimal,Std. IX, NSGHS fvlannar, residing atAthira Bhavan, Parukkara,Mannar PO, Alapuzha District.

Ajmila. P.A., D/o Abdul Kareent,Std. VIII, NSGHS Mannar, residing atPonnam Parambil, Kuthen Peroor,Mannar PO, Alapuzha District.

(-'

5Z

10, Athira Rqjan, D/o Rqjan.T.V.,Std. IX, NSGHS Mannar, residing atMemalakkattil House, Budhanoor PO,Chengannoor, Alapuzha District.

By Advocate :- S. latha

Respondents : , 1. The Director of Higher SecondaryEducation, Joint General Co ordinater,Thiruvananthapuram Kerala State SchoolKalolsavam 20L0-11 held at Kbttayam .

2. The negional Deputy Director of HigherSecondary Education, KottaYam,Kerala State School Kalolsavam 2010-L1held at Kottayam .

3. The General Convenor, Programms

Kalolsavam 2010-11Held at Kott'ayam -


Complaint No. 294/20L1 C

Complainant t Vljayalakshmi L Pai Minor representedby her Guardian SmL Manju L Pai,Wo Jayalakshmana Pai, residing at9/1165 (A), L.G. Pai Road, Kochi.

- - - -- :llTg::t=1"9::=" :-

Respondents : L. The Programme Convener,Kerala State School Kalolsavam 20L0-tLKotbaYam.

'c " 2. ' The Deputy Director of Education,Ernakulam.

3. The General Co ordinator,

ffff":rte school Kalolsavam 2010-11


1

)/

Complainants

5b

Complaint N,o. 2962O11 C

1. Anju Paul Minor representedby her father K.V. Paulose,S/o K.I. Vareeth, residing atKotottukudi House, NaYar Thara,

, Kanjikode PO, Palakkad Disfrict.

2. Praseetha.K., Dio Krishnan Kutty,Krishna Nilayam, Near Village Office,Kanjikode, Palakkad-

3. Saarika, D/o Shambu P-K.,Sree NilaYam, Thamarakulam,Kaqjikode,:Palakkad-

Aiswarya. K D/o S. Krishna Kumar,NiranjanarKena Gardens, , '

Vasakkanthara, Pudusserry, Palakkad.

Ashwini.A; D/o Aravindakshan. C,

t 53/b, NarasimhaPuram,Kanjikode (w), Palakkad.

Supraja.G, D I oGovindharajan. S

BllL, PCS Colony,Kanjikode, Palakkad.

Ranju Sree P.R, D/o P.Ramakishnan,Sreepadmam, Near Water Tank,Kanjikode, Palakkad.

f.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Respondents 1. The Chairman, APPeaI Committee,Kerala State School Kalolsavam,Palakkad.

-l - , - ... ,.. ,.-,, -'^--,i ./ ..,._--

j..- :_.:-... j.',.-:. .. i.i:. ...j-.:

l'.r :- ;-.,:- ! i41:.r-' 3;;L;r-:r: I ; -aiolsavam 2 0 1 0- 1 1

Kottayam .

3. The Deputy Director of Education,Palaldrad.

" By Senior Government Pleader

Al'---7 z": 1z/

_--.--.-T-]*---Til<{.

Er22

Complaint No. 3O2l2O11 A- ,.'.: ;

Complainant : Anjalin Paul, Std X, St. Ctherines H.1.'S.S. ipayyampally, Wayanad & three others *: (minors) represented by Paul P Mti'thew,

, the father of Anjalin Paul,Puthenpurbckelhouse, Payyampally P.O., Wayanadu.

' .tBy Advocate :- Smt. S. Sreekala ,r ,l

iR.espondents : 1. The General'Convenor, Progiramme.I

:., :.

+ ,i . , ,, . i , '. ; 2. Deputy Director of Educafon, 'r r' b: Revenue District, WaYandu ::;l'

f- O T\^n"l-' T\iraalar ^f D.l'na|inn I

. '

.


:

i

: Complaint No. 304/20L1 A

Complainant : T.K- Sasi, S/o C. Kochuraman,High School Assistant (music),Sree Vivekananda High School,Pandanadu, Chengannur - 689 506.

By Advocate :- G.K. Sudheer:

Respondents : 1' The General convenor /Deputy Director of

l3x;J'3:,%1"#'1ty"::#fr TSlti'"Otiice of the Deputy Director (Education),AlaPPuzha District.

' 2' The General Convenor/ AddittonalDirector of Public Instructions, 5L't

. Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-1L, .. KottaYam-

::: BY Senior Government Pleader '.

I

*--"'-'

II

l

i

h,

I' ,:, .;

56

Coinplaint No. 3O6/2011 A

Complainant , ,. Supriya Suseelan (Minor) represented,byher father Sri. R. Suseelan,2ll0l,NaraYana vilassam, Chelikuzhi P'O',Pattazhi Vadakkekara, Kollam.

By Advocate :- S. PradeeP kumar

- RespondentsOffice of the DePutY Director ofEducation, Kottayam :

2. Chairman, Appeal Committeq,(Deputy Director of Education,' Kollam)

. Kollam Pisltict Revenue SchoolKalolsavam 20L0.L1. : .

3. General:Convenor, Kerala State SchoolKalolsavam 201 0-1 1, KottaYarn.

ir"


Complaint No' 3O8120L1 A

t . - ---!Complalnant : GittuJoy, Class XII, St' ThomasH. S. S.Thomapuram, Kazargod.Represented by his fatherJoy Antony,Kalappurackal, West Eleri P.O., Hosedurg,

......':...'By Advocate :- Cherunniyoor P Sasidharan Nair

Respondents : 1.. General Convener,Kerala State School Kalolsavam 2010-11And Addl. D.P.I. Thiruvananthapuram &Kottayam.

2. The Convener, Prognamme Committee'Kerala School Kalolsavam 2010-11Kottayam

3. Deputy Director of Education, Kottayam'

. BY Senior Government Pleader

&-t'

. -+ :-{arqr rR;?H;HlF?gFT+=-r-rtF-: .

ir57

',,, co@ ,b

Complainants : 1. Deepa Thilakan (Team Leader),Class Xl, Govt. BHSS, Kayamkulam.

2. Anuja Mohana Kurup,

r. Sreepriya.V' -1 4. Surya.S,

. ,: --, .,:, ,.: Class Xll, Govt. BHSS, Kayamkulam.

' 6. Athira.R, "*i.'.''.''''.'.;',.]:;1....].".ji-i;.ci,euiti,co',t.BHSS,Kayamkulam,

, 7. Anu Rengini.R,-. "' r' .i,.';1" :'. ,.i:, ':. Class Xll, Govt. BHSS, Kayamkulam.

" Hima Mohan,o.

, Class Xl, Govt. BHSS, Kayamkulam.10. Sreelekshmi.S.,

Represented by V.Mohanakurup, Father of Anuja I

MohanaKurup, 2nd complainant @ Mohanam,Pullikkanakku,

, Kayamkulam, Alapuzha District.

+ry

Respondents ; 1. General Convenor,Kerala School Kalolsava m 2010-2011 and

Addl.D.P.l '

I l: i "l-:.r, ;,,1 ; 1 ; ii i,, t_,,r j.:j i.i-i i ;r,l KOttayam ).'':: ' -. ii

--: ; : '- -'

Programme Committee,

3 ffi:il?S:::3i'[if:xff 2o1o-2a11' KottaYam

Kottayam

BY Senior Government Pleader.

. ..:t: I : i

:

Corrplainant

By Advocate

Responde-nts, , j 'i i r.: ,, :

. . :'t .:,:

, 'Complainant :

'-'; i

Conplaint No. 31212011 B

Anumon. D.S. Represented by his-iiiotherSuma.S, S.D.tand, Mullararncode, ; , j

Manampoor P.O., Kallambalam,Thiruvan anthapuram Dist.

:- Muhammea r'rilint. Deputy Director, General Educationt

Chairrran, Appeal Committee,l:.

School Kalolsavam .. . . .

. ::,rr.i . ' '2. The General Convenor, Keralo:Stat9-, ;',

i ,.,, , ,,', ;, , , i '. School Kalolsavam 20t0't1, .'Kottayam..

i i''',1,\..-:::::'::: 3. Deputy.Director of Educatign; Kotbayam.


Complaint No; 31412011 B

Digina Divakaran, D lo Divakaran,Kallil House, P.O. MemmudaVillapalli amsom desom, Mem:nundaXII st, Memunda Higher Secondary,Koztrikode.

t

By Advocate :- P. Muhemmed Haneef

Kozhikode Revenue District SchoolKalolsavam, Deputy Director of Education,Koztrikode.

' 2. Tn-e Convenor, Progralrme Committee.Kerala State School Kalolsavam 20t0-tl'Kottayam taluk, KottaYam - 1-


5q

The Chainnan,,,A.ppeal CommitLee,'Kozhikode Revenue District SchoolKalolsavam, Deputy Director of Education,Kozhikode.

2. The Convenor, Programme Cornnittee:Kera]a State'school Kalotsavam 201 }-tl,'Kottayam taluk, Kottayam - 1. ,. r i . i

By Senior Government Fleader

Complaint No. 3l-B/20l,L B

: Deepthi Sathyan, D/o Sathyanathan,Thazhekunnathu Cherod arnsom, "

Chennamangalam desom, XII st,Memunda Higher Secondary,Kozhikode.

'i!a':.

.f;,

"..t"itF

.*

1

By Advocate :- P. Muhammed Haneef

Respondents : ').. The Chairuran, Appeal Committee,

- .. ..=......''-.-.".,Kalolsavam, Deputy Director of Education,Kozhikode.

2. The Convenor, Programme Committee.. Kera-la Stare Scherl Kalolsavam 2010-1'1,

i-r.ii-i.-:'.'ii,' ', ,ri;t .. r;l::,iit'. am - 1.


a\ Comblaint No. 31612O11 B

Complainant :

By Advocate

Respondents :

z.

Complainant

Aqil Rasheed.S.M., S/o Abdul Rasheed, ,

S.M. House, Parappil, Kozhikode, ' ,.

XIIst, MMHS Higher Secondary School,Parappil, Kozhikode.

Sri. P. Rahim

I

60

Complaint No. 320/2O11 B

H arikrishnan.R. (Minor),S/o R. Rashakrishna Pillai,SBHSS Manar, X std., AlaPPuzha,Rep. by next friend C B Manoharan Nair,S/o Sankarapillai, Sangarabharanam,Kurattikad, Manar, AlaPPuzha.

I

Complain

Respondents

Complainants

By Advocate :- P. Muhammed Haneef

: ', 1. The Chairman, APPeal Committee,Kozhikode Revenue DisH'ict SchoolKalolsavam, Deputy Director of Education,Koztrikode.

2. The Convenor, Progrramme Committee'Kerala State School l(alolsava:m 20L0-LL,KotbaYam taluk, KottaYam - 1-



1. RoshnaJamal, Minor, Residing at

. Naduvila, VilaPPil .H.O Ponnani,' Team Captain of the Bandmelam H'S'

General, Student of Vijayamatha EMHSS,Ponnani represented by mother of thecomPlainant Jameela Jamal'

2. Unnimaya P.U., D/o Sandhya Kannan,Palliklcara house, Ponnani-

3. Renjini.K.P., D/o Sharmila. K.,

RenJini H ouse, Eswaramarrgalam P.O'

4. Shini.P.S ., Dlo Shelvi A.P.,Padunna ValaPPil House,Kadavanad, Ponnani

5. Vismaya 8,V., D/o Ajitha Viswanathan,Edayil ValaPPil house,Kadanchery P.O-, Kaladi.

(v.

r nYslRilwg-rr 1

6r

b. Athira.K. , Dlo Bindhu.V.G.,Kormmavalappil house, ThrikkavuPonnani.

Arathi.K, D I oBindhu.V.G.,Kormmavalappil house, ThrikkavuPonnani.

Bisna.P.V ., D I o EIsy Varghese,Pulinthara.house, Ponnani P.O.

Ema Babu.K.V., D/o Nisha Babu,Karuppakka Veettil House,Near Barlikulam, ChandaPadi,Ponnani.

Shana Thesnim , Dlo Zeenath,Madheena House, Eramankalart,Ponnani.

Hazeena.M., D/o Fathima.MMunnabathakath house,Kuttikadu, Ponnani.

Reshma.S ., D loBindhu.K.P.,Kaniyam Parambil House,Thaikkavu, Ponnani.

Sajina.T., D/o Hyder.TThalappil house, Ponnani.

t7.

B.

9.

al

e,10.

11.

12.

' 13.

14. Rafkan Razak.P.P ., Dlo Kubra R.V-

15.

Ravimarakkar Veettil,

Sisitha.C ., D I o Prajitha.T.,Theratby house, EzhuvathiruthY,Pulikakadarnr, Ponnani .P-O.

S i-;.:; ;--;;Lrl:, . I "',','i SumathY SureSh,

Punnakkal house, Kadavanad-P -O.,

Ponnani.

Aswathy R Menon , Dlo Sheeja Ravindran,Aswathy, VenmanaPurathu House,Thrikanapuram. PO., Kaladi (Via).

t7.

If4 ----

;! !.

6?.

. 18. 4{4yu:ayaraj. p, D/o BindhuJayaraj,falakkayil House, Theyagact<. pO.,Ponnani.

19. Musthahsina.U.T., D/o Naseeba.p.,Parambil House, Eswaramanagalam pO.

20. Rabia.K., D/o Sulaikha. M.,Kongassery House, pothannoor pO.,Polpakara, ponnani.

: L. The Depqty Director of, Education,Kottayam,- Kerala S chool.,Kalolsavam 2010 -LL, Kottaya*.

2. The Convenor, programme Committee.Kerala School Kalolsavbm zOlO-lL,Held at Kottayam

3. The Deputy Director of Education,Malappuram

Complainants


Complaint No. 326/2O11 C

1. Neema Mohandas (Minor) representedby her father Mohandas V

2.

3.

4.

5-

Velu il House

Aiswarya.C., Cheriyangaftu House,Ariyallur PO, Malappuram.

Haritha.O., Odukkathil House,Ariyallur PO, Malappuram.

Manpreeth, Sooryasila House,Velimukku PO, Malappuram.

Abhinima, Noopuram House,Velimukku PO, Malappuram.

" By Advocate :- Sri. Babu P. Pothencode

63

Respondents : 1. The General Convener,Kerala State SchoolKalolsavam 2010 - 7I, KoLtayam

2. The Assistant Director of Pubtic :Instruction, O/o D.P.I., Jagathy, ,Thiruvananthapuram.

3. The Deputy Director of Education,O/o Deputy Director of Education,

. Malappuram.


, , Complaint No. 336/2Ol"1 A ' ,i,'t

.- ,!. .

t, . 2. Amrutha.M.? Chandralekha.V.K. rJ.

4. Chinju.V.

6. Athira.V

' 7. Vandana.KI

(The complainants are represented bythe L't I

complainant's father Vljayakumar P.V.,S/o Madhavan, Padinjare ValapPil,Vilayoor PO., Palakkad). :

i.- rF€

Respondents : L. The Convener, Programme Committee,I

District School Kalolsavam,O/o Deputy Director of Educa[on, ',

T1....t-l-t-,. Ji- i"1Lr-'.-ai\ -t

2. The Deputy Director of EducationKotLayam.

3. The General Convener,Programme Committee,State School KalolsavamO/o Deputy Director of Education,Malappuram.


: ,,/

"'--;'{1q-:r9;.6+

Complainant

Complaint No. 342/2O11

: Frathusha.P.M.D/o Prama Rajan, X std.,Chinmaya Vidhyalayam, Calicut.

By Advocate :- Sri. P. Muhammed Haneef

Respondents : 1. The Chairman, Appeal Committee,Kozhikode Revenue Disfrict SchoolKalolsavam, Deputy Director of Education,Kozhikode.

2. The Convenor, Progrramrne Conrmittee.Kerala State School Kalolsavam 20I0-tt,Kotbayam - 1.


Complainant

Complaint No. 344/2OI-1 B

: ' Jamuna.P.(Minor) represented bynext friend, father Rajagopalan,S/o Govindan Nair, Fulilkapparambilhouse, Sreekrishnapuram Post,Ottappalam taluk, Palakkad district.

ByAdvocate :- K.S. Satheesh kumar

--- * ---*--*+ge€€ref€I@---:*Committee, 51" State SchoolKalolsavam 2010-11., MT SeminaryHigher Secondary School, Kottayam

By Senior Goverr.rment Pleader

I

65


, complainants : 1. MuhammedJabir. M., Modothayil,

2. Riyas.T

: a 3. Faisal Abid.T.K.I

\ 4. Jaber.K

, 5. Afpar.A'6.

Jihad B.M.

B. Matroof K

10. MohammedJasher.K

ByAdvocate :- Sri. G.S. Rajeev

. Respondents : 1". The Director of Higher SecondaryEducation, Directorate of HigherSecondary Education.

2. Regional Deputy Director of HigherSecondary Education, Kottayam,

a, '_- '_

Kottayam,

2. The Convenor, Programme Committee.Kerala State School Kalolsavam 201041",f.r^tL-. --. --,.t\.:,-iL!..,( ;_1.

Iiy Seiiior G,rvelnmeni l ,.eacier-

,}

Complainants

l----

66


1. Sandra Maria Thomas,Studying at G.H.S.S., Thariode,Kavummannam Village, Thariode Taluk,Wayanad Dist.

2. Albin Manuel,,-do-

3. Alex Anto , -do-

4. Amal Unnikrishnan, - do -

5. Rahul .K, - do -6. Amal Dev Sasikumar, - do -7. Prajith T.C., - do -(All represented by Daisy Mathew Mother of SandraMaria Thomas)

Smt. Sreekala . SByAdvocate:-

Respondents 1. The General Convener, Programme Committee,Kerala State School Kalolsava m 2010-2011.

Deputy Director of Education, Wayanad.

Deputy Director of Education, Kottayam.

2.

3.

)

61

Complain! No.98/2011 A

Complainants . 1. Kum. Aswathy Krishnan.R (minor),(Team Leader), Std lX,St. Chrysostum G.H.S., Nellimooduand residing at Vijaya Bhavan,Paloorikuzhi, Vedivachancoil P.O.,Balaramapuram, Thiruvananthapuram.

2. Anitha. S., Stdi, St. Chrysostum G.H.S.,Nellimoodu.

3. Anupama, Std lX, -do-

'4. Nazrin Fathima, Std lX, . do -

. 5. Swathy. S, Std Vlll, - do -

6. Anu Joy, Std lX, - do -

7. Ashitlla Mjay, Std X, - do -

8. Athira Dushandan, Std lX,

9. Aparna K.S., Std X, - do -

10. Sreekutty. M.S. Std X, - do -

D.D. Office, Kottayam P.O. '

2. General Convenor, Programme Committee,State Levrt Schect !{alolsavam,

' P;:,:i.r i-, .-,-:II'.j 1i1 ,i.,; r'3fi1.

3. General Convenor,DDE, Thiruvananthapuram.


(All represented by Smt. Ambika Devi, D/o Syamalaand mother of the 1"t complainant and being the nextfriend of complainants 2 to 10)


/)( 2-r'\

(

6s


Complainants '. 1. Kum. Jeena Justin (minor),(Team Leader), Plus 2 Student,St. Chrysostum G.H S , Nellimooduand residing at Sheeja Cottage,Puthiyathura P.O., Thiruvnnanthapuram.

2. Krishna Prathibha. V.K.,Plus 2 Student, St. Chrysostum G.H.S.,Nellirnoodu.

3. Arya.S., Plus 1 Student, -do-

4. Neethu J.S, Plus 2 Student, - do

5. Anju. S.S, Plus 1 Student, - do -

6. Sony K. Jain, Plus 2 Student, - do -

(All represented by Smt. Sheeja Justin,D/o Pushpam and mother of the 1't complainant,being the next friend of complainants 2 to 7)


Respondents '. 1. The Deputy Director of Education,

2. General Convenor, Programme Committee,State Level School Kalolsavam,Police Ground, Kottayam.

3. General Convenor,DDE, Thiruvananthapuram.


69

ORDER

: These. afe complaints filed against the decision of the

respondents declining permission to the aggrieved students to participate

as contestants in the respective items of art in the District Level and/or

, the State Level Kalolsavam - 2010. Competitions in the performing arts-/'

and cultural events are held in the State School Kalolsavam every year for

pupils studyfng in, , Standards 1 to L2 under the auspices of the Education

Primary School,Level consisting of Standards t to 4, at the Upper Primary

Level consisting of,standards 5 to 7 (category 2), at the High School Level

consisting,of Standards 8 to l-0 {category 3) and at the Higher Secondary

School Level consisting of Standards L1 and 1,2 (category 4). Competitions

for category 1 are to come to an end by the declaration of the results of

the Sub District Level coml.retitions, those for category 2 at the Revenue

:=-D_:::t"!:y:1 1:q r":.::!yT-:: 131 ::y9* pre-t$e:::-Depending on ttre perforrnance of the contestants, they would be graded

as A, B and C. Participants lvho secure 70% and more marks are eligible

:,+,.-.:i.:i.,1.u..-,:aji.,iu,i,t:,:-,:.l-;t,'..;:r:|-'i,.i':,ii},l'i.f:.i:;...j.,".1:l':l'l-|..i|].'.'.];.ttbe1ow70o/oget

B grade anC those who seclire 50%and above but below 600/o get C grade.

'A' grade winners will get 5 points, 'B' grade and 'C' grade winners will get

points 3 and 1 respectively. Students who belong to categories.3 and 4, i

\

70

depending on the grade and-the rank they secure at the lower level

competitions, are permitted to compete at the District Level and,

thereafter, at the State Level competitions. Only ttre student or the team

of students, as the case m,^ay be, who in the respective item gets the top

most rank among A grade winners would be eligible to perform as

contestant in the next higher level competitfbn. Students who secure A or

B or C grades are eligible for grace marks at the rate of 30, 24 and LB

respectively. Expenditure for the conduct,'of the State Level School

Kalolsavarn'shall have to be met byrtheGenera{ Educatlon::Depar'tment,,the

,Higher Secondary ' School Department and' the Vocational Higher

hnnl f)pnartm€ o of 3:2:1. The amount thusSecondary School Department in the rati-

received shall be deposited in a Nationalised Bank in the account of the

Director of public Instructions. Fund thus available shall be utilised for

meeting various expenses in consultation with the Directors of the other

two Departments.

Kalolsavam competitions held at the Sub District Level and at the Revenue

District Level for students belonging to Standards B to 10 (High School

level) and standards LL and 12 (Higher Secondary School Level).

3. Government in the General Education Department has

issued guidelines for the conduct of the School Kalolsavam in general and

{t<-'

i

7L

those pertaining to the conduct'of the competitions for categories 1 to 4, in

particular. These guidelines are called the Manual for School Kalolsavam.

Items meant for category 3 are grouped into 13 divisions and those for

category 4 are grouped into l. L divisions. As far as the competitions for

certain items are concerned, boys and girls are grouped together whereas

for cer[ain other items competitions for boys and girls are held separately. .

, , As per the guidelines, competitions at the Revenue District level shalt be: ,;

;

,( , conducted before the second week of: December every year. 'One' of the.' 't*.

competitions. The top scorer in each itern-,Who has secured A grade in the

Sub District Level competition alone has got the right to participate in the

District level competition. Even in cases where only one student had come

forward to compete for a parLicular item at the Sub District level, that

student also will have the right to participate in the District level '

competition provided he or she must have secured the appropriate grade

[email protected] ^.---

Revenue District level competition, he/she will have the right to participate

in the State level competitibn also.

4. For the proper conduct of the District level competitions an

Organising Committee shali be constituted in each District. It shall be ttre

duff of the Deputy Director of Education to constitute the Organising

72

Committee. Hon'ble Ministers, Members of the Parliament, Legislative

Members of the Assembly who hail from the District concerned, president

of the District Panchayat, 'District Collector and Superintendent of police

shall be the patrgns. The Chairman of the Organising Committee shall be

the District Panchayat president/ Mayor / Municipal Chairman and the

Vice Chairman shall be the Standing Comrnittee Chairrnan for Education of '-J --

: the District/ Panchayat/Corporation/ Municipality. The Deputy Director of

. Education shall be. the General Convener. The Regional Deputy Director ,

' ,: Li.,,il, ' thg,Assistantr,Drpector,,,the PrincipaUHeadmaster and the Diet Principal of ,'

, ,' , ttle School where, cornpetitions are held shall be the Joint Conveners. The

DistrictEducationaloffrcershallbetheTreasurer.TheSubCommittee

Chairman, Conveners, representatives of the recognised Teachers' "

Organisations, District Educational Offrcers, Sub District Educational

Officers, P.T.A. President and Mother P.T.A. President of the School,

Parliament Chairman and Secretary of the School where the competitions

--,. ' -- pql-be$-'gf ,,ttlq,"Qrg. $i ----.

Revenue District will be giyen a sum not exceeding rupees one and a half

lakhs for the conduct of the District Level Kalolsavam so that each Sub

District will be eligible to appropriate Rs.20,000/- towards expenses for the

festival. Contributions from the members of the public can be received, if :

need be, for the Revenue District level festival, by selling coupons. Income

u

73

and expenditure accounts shall be subjected to auditing by a Chartered

Accountant appointed by the Deputy Director of Education and approved

by the Organising Committee. Performance of the competitors in each t

item shall be observed scrupulously and the'merit of the performance as

also the eligibility of the participants evaluated and assessed for grading

and ranking. -.The Deputy Director of Education shall find out competent

persons for inclusion in the JudEes' panel from the list of persons approved '

by the:Director of Public Instructions. Performance of the contesting*'*

students,in-thgsa.rne r.tefii of competition shall necessarily'be'judged by the :

confidential. Their names and qualifications shall, however, be announced

at the venue of the competition just before the commencement of the

. competition. Well before the commencement of the competition, the

Judges shall be provided with necessary facilities including equipments for

the proper discharge of their duties. Supply of score sheet to the Judges

."---sbllse+asused-by-tb€-orgarrisers@u-Es€@----*-

Judges shall take into account all relevant aspects including the nuances of

the each concerned item of art. They shall assess the merit of the

performance of the parricrpanrs givtrg clue consideratron for the ciiff'erent

-components, split up the marks for the respective components and record

the same in the score sheet. As far as possible corrections and over

74

writings in the score sheet/mark list shall be avoided. If corrections or

overwritings become unavoidable, the Judge concerned shall attest the

same by subscribing his signature in the respective place. As soon as the

competition in a particular item is over, tabulation of the marks shall be

done in the presence of the Judges and the result of the competition shall

be announced by one of them. For the benefit of the students and all

others concerned this shall be done in the very stage/venue of competltion.

While announcing the result of the competition, care shall be taken to

mention the code and the grade of the top scorer. Similarly, the marks

scored and the grades awarded to other parbicipants also shall be

announced. The original mark list as also the tabulation list shall be kept

in tact in a sealed cover for a minimum period of three months in the offrce

. of the Deputy Director of Education. Director of Public Instructions will

have the power to call for the mark list and the tabulation list and pemse

the same, if necessary. Complaints against the grading or ranking given to

be considered by the Appeal Committee constituted for that purpose. It is

the duty of the Appeal Committee to consider the technical as also the

legal aspects per[aining to. the competition in the respective item. Re-

appraisal of the merit of the performance or replay of the item which is the

subject matter of appeai is not contemplated or permitted while

Q-"'

. -,_. .,,1a i:i::t!

75

considering the appeals. ' Decision of the Appeal Committee shall be

recorded by the Chairman. It shall be in the proforrna provided for that

purpose. Rs.500/'will be charged as fees for fi.ling the appeal. The fees

will be refunded if the appeal is allowed. The decision of the Appeal

Committee will be final. Participants or the team consisting of participants

in a compgtition which fail to'secure the first place in the Revenue District

Level competition, will not be allowed to participate in the higher level

competition, except according to the decision of the Appeal Committee.

Persons including students who indulge in discourteous, indisciplined or

provocative behaviour with the intention of disturbing the orderly conduct

of the competition will be subjected to penal action by the Disciplinary

Committee constituted for that purpose. It is the duty of the General

Conveners to constitute the Disciplinary Committee comprising of the

concerned Educational Officers. It shall be ensured that female officers

also are included in the Disciplinary Committee. The total number of

Certificates will be issued to all participants who get A grade. As soon as

the Revenue District Level competitions are over, relevant details about

the ccnC';lt lf tlc c:n,.:-ti':- cl,lll l:l ict,::,-i:d ic 1l:t |j-. -,,:l'cr of r,-,hljc']'-. -; 'r - r/l-':

Instntctions. Three copies of the list containing the details of those

selected for the State Level competition along with the C.D. shall be made

76

available to the General Convener of the State Level Competition. It has

been made clear by the State Government that only the top scorer with A

grade in each item will have the right to participate in the respective item

at the State Level Competitions.

5. State Level competitions, in the normal course, shall be held

before the end of the third week of December in each year. There shall be

an Organising Committee. and a Working Committee for the proper

conduct of ,the :State ,level competition. Hon'ble Chief ,Minister, Hon'ble

' Leader of'' Opposition, Hon'ble Education Minister and , other, ' Hon'ble :

Ministers of the District in which the competitions are scheduled tb take

I .tt Iplace will be the Chief Patrons of the Organising Committee. Members of

the Parliament, Members of the Legislative Assembly representing the

. constituencies in that District, President of the District Panchayat, District

Collector and Superintgndent of Police shall be the Patrons.

MayorA,Iunicipal Chairman/ District Panchayat President shall be the

- nisin -**

Corporation/Vice Chairman of the MunicipaliflPresident of the Grama

Panchayat/ Chairman of the Standing Committee in charge of education

matters shall be the Vice Chairman. Director of Public Instructions will be

the General Co-ordinator. Directors of the Higher Secondary School and

Vocational Higher Second.ary Education shall be the Joint General Co-

/1 -// L^ ,-/i ./' -,.\. 1---

77

ordinators. Additional Director of Public Instructions (General) shall be

theGeneralConvener.ThereareJointGeneralConvenersanda

Treasurer. Members of the Committee shall consist of the officers of the

Education Department, representatives of the Teachers' Organisations,

Heads of Departments at the District level, President of the P.T.A. and..

Mother P.T.A. President, various representatives of tlie general public, .

office bearers of the School Parliament, etc. Chief Patrons of the .;.,

'Organising Committee will be enlisted'as the Chief Patrons of the Working ''*

Committee,,wifl be the Patrons of the Working Committee also. Director of

Public Instructions shall be the President of the Working Committee while

Director of Higher Secondary Schools, Director of the Vocational Higher

. Secondary Education and l.oint Director of the Education Deparbment shall

be the Vice Presidents. Additional Director of Education Department shall

be the General Convener. There will be Joint General Conveners, Joint

-'* r'aseffiffi@,**-Chairman and Conveners of all the Sub Committees shall be the members

of the Working Committee. The responsibiliff for the proper conduct of

the State I.evel Cc:.*i':.'1.,-i ,i;:: :.r-,.''li vc:;i i:: t.,:i: i*i1 g1,..,.1:,,i,; Committee. ,

Preparation of. the budget and due allotment of funds necessary for the

various Committees have to be done by the Organising Committee.

G-'

7B

Accounts showing the income and expenditure connected with the conduct

of the State Level Festival shall be subjected to auditing by a Charbered

Accountant and after due discussion and approval, it shall be placed before

the Director of Public Instructions within the stipulated time limit. It shali

be the duty of the Organising Committee to co-ordinate the proper

functioning of the various Committees. In addition to the above

Committees, Sub Committees also will be formed as follows: (a) Reception

Committee (b) Food Committee ( c) Publicity Committee (d) Programme

Committee (e) Law and Order Committee (0 Welfare Committee (g)

- Registration Cornmittee (h) Accommodation Committee (i) Transport

Committee 0) Trophy Committee (k) Stage and Pandel Committee (l) Light

and Sound Committee (m) Souvenir Committee (n) Finance Committee and

. (o) Procession Committee. '

: 6. Provisions have been made in the Manual for the constitution

of Appeal Committees to consider and dispose of appeals filed at the

- . .--- , Scboo v, ,-Ca, ions, Suh -

District Level Competitions and State Level Competitions. School Level

Appeal Committee shall be presided over by the Educational Offrcer of the

Sub District and four members. Two of the members shall be experts in

the Art subjects and the other two members shall be the Assistant Director

of V.H.S.C. or his representative and the Regional Deputy Director of

79

H.S.E. or his representatrye. Aggrieved persons shall file appeal rn the

prescribed form accompanied by the fee receipt within one hour from the

time of announcemcnt of the results of the competition. If the appeal is

allowed, the fee shall be refunded to the appellant and in other cases, the

amount received as fee shall be handed over to the Organising.Committee.

All appeals received as above, shall immediately be placed before the

Educational offrcer of the sub District who shall be the chairman of the

Appeal committee. Appeal'committee shalliconsider the appeals in detail'

dispose of the same *i11,i,, five days, and in any event, before the

commencement of the District Level Festival and communicate the

decision in writing to the concerned persons'

7 . Appeal committee in relation to the sub District level

competitions has also to be similarly constituted with the difference ttrat

the chairman shall be the District Educational officer of the District

concerned. Regarding the form prescribed for the appeal' remittance of

&

:r

prescribed for the disposal and the communication of the decision, similar

provisions have been made as in the case of the School Level Appeal

Committee.

8. Appeal committee to consider and dispose of appeals f,led by

persons aggrieved by the result of the sub District Level competitions

C-''

BO

consists-of nine members including the Chairman who shall be the Deputy

Director of Education. Appeal Committee shall be constituted at the very

commencement of the academic year. Regional Deputy 'Director and

Assistant Director, V.H.S.E. of the region concerned shall be members of

the Appeal Committee. The remaining six members shall be eminent

. persons in the field of Arbs. There shall be experts r$ (1) classical dances

^: (2) classical music (3) instrumental music (4) painting (5) percussion:

.; : , remain fo , a lperiod , of one year- , Due notification shall be pubtished

regarding the,,fo,rmation,of the Appeal Com_mittee. It is the duty of the

Chairman to collect the bio-data of the members of the Appeal Committee

and to apply his mind to the same. The Chairman shall have the freedom

to incorporate additional members if it is found that experts in other forms

are necessary for proper consideration and disposal .of the appeals.

Members referred to as 1 to 6 above or the additional members shall be

_.. rye+sf ll'q r-*willingness. Appeal Committee is empowered to consider the technical and

the legal aspects of the contentions in the appeal and after due discussion

of the points raised in the appeal appropriate decision shall be taken

giving reasons tberefor. Regarding other matters such as. the form

prescribed for filing the appeal, remittance of fees, refund of fees, time

B1

limit for fiting the appeal, time stipulated for the disposal of the appeal,:

communicationofthedecisiontotheconcernedpersonS,etc.provisions

similar to those applicable to the School Level and Sub District Level r

competitions are prescribed herein also. It is, however, provided as a

_.condition that the minutes of the Appeal Committee shall be recorded in a.

register and copy of the same shall be made available immediately to the

Director of Public Instructions.

. ..'t: ...

:''i

:':.."the'decisionof.theDistrictLevelcompeutionsconsistof1.1members

including the Chairman who shall be the Director of Public Instructions.

The Director of H.S.E and V.H.S.C. shall necessarily be the members.

Other members shall be persons who are renowned for their proficiency

. in the various Art forms that are scheduled to be performed on the stage at

the State Level Competition. Such members shall be appointed only after

ascerlaining their willingness. Items for which subject experts are to be

forms of art (3) instrumental music (4) paintings (5) percussion

instruments (6) literature and (7) acting. Officiai notification constituting

lhe Appeal Committee shall be published by the Director of Public

Instructions. AddiHonal members can be iircorporated in the Appeal

Committee if the Director of Public Instructions fi.nds that there is need to

(7/

82

do so. Appeal Committee is empowered to take appropriate decision after

considering the grievances and contentions stated in the appeal.

Regarding the refund of 'fees, getting bio-data of the members, f,ling

declaration as in Annexure 5, etc. similar provisions as in the case of other

Appeal Committees have been incorporated. But the fees.prescribed for

filing the appeal is Rs.1-,000/-. Decision-sf the Appeal Committee shall be

communicated to the persons concerned. Minutes of the Appeal

- .Committee shall berecorded in a register to be maintained for perusal and -

scrutiny. Those who get permission to participate in the State Level

competition based on the decision taken by the Appeal Committee at the

'District Level shall deposit earnest moley of Rs.5,000^. If they fail to

score better marks than persons who had already been allowed to

participate in the State Level competition from the District concetned,

grace marks witl not be awarded nor the certificates issued to them.

Moreover, the earnest money deposit will be forfeited.

Manual that members of

the Judges' panel shall be competent and qualified in the art concerned to

evaluate the perfonnance of each and every contestant in the competition

at the appropriate levels. In order to ensure that the selection and

appointment of experts as members of the Judges Committee is in

accordance with the above stipulation, their bio-data and declaration shall

B5

Complainants in almost all these cases have suffered injustice and

hardship on account of th'e faulff and poor arrangements made by the

organisers of the festival, especially the stage, the light system and the

sound system. Supply of electricity was disrupted or cut off while the

performance was going cn. Poor light arrangemenbs and faulty sound ,

tysterrnaffected the perfonnance of a section of the complainants. Low r

quality amplifier and mike, frequent variations in the electric supply, short ,ri,,s

' circuits, sub standard quality of the tape recorder, non-availability of ,, *generator and similar defects also have given rise to grievances and

- complaints. C. Nos.44, 46, 66, 78, 88, 90, 118, LSZ, 1G0, 166, 169 , !64,

174, 17.8, 1Bg, Ig2, 200, 204, 2!7, 220, 229, 238, 244, 248, 250, 256, 262,

276, 278, 292, 294, 300, 302, 308, 346, etc. of the year 2011. are some of

. them.

14. Complaints have been flled alleging bias, partiality and lack

of integrity on the part of the Jud$es included in the panel, both original

-

some of the experts on account of their over enthusiasm to nurture certain

participants and schools at the expense of the meritorious have been

,::1i,.:li, 'li;;.:.;:,iaiiletils 1. ,,'.' I - rr"-. :i. i1,-, ,--t".i.rtI.i :ii i-:t:.-:i':ir i]:a'i. i.l;e

Educational Officers have yrelded to the influence of some of the school

authorities for extraneous considerations. It is alleged that affluent

86

persons have got a say in the.matter of choosing the expert members in

the judges panel. 1-hey asserl that this pattern of functioning has been

accepted by all as if it is the unwritten law. According to them, there is no

machinery to oversee or supervise such maftractices committed by the

Educational Officers and organisers. Things are taken for granted in spite

of the fact that talented students coming from the government schools

and the rural areas in particular are neglected and unfairly treated. C.

Nos. 2116,2!18,2!22, 2L30, 2t4}of the year 2010 and 6, 8, 27., 1g4, 2L8,

222, 232, 234,238,246, 254, 264,266,270,280, 308, 3L4, 326, etc. of the

year 20LL are some of the cases where allegations are directed against the

panel of Judges and the poor quality of judging.

15. In C. No.3L APAL1, the complainants have brought to the

notice of this Forum the foliowing grounds to inipugn the decision of the

respondents. When reproduced, they read like this: (i) The stage was not

for the olatform withoul

proper support, it has affected the smoothness of the stage thereby

adversely affecting the performance of the team. Part of the stage

collapsed during the perforrnance because of the callous negligence of the

organisers. (ii) Electncl[y failed during the perfonnances which too have

affected the perforrnance. (lii) The curtain was pulled down while the

'87

perforrnance was at its climax which caused commotion among the

participants and the audience, and they sought for fresh opportunity to

perform. But it was denied. The photographs produced herewith would i

show the negligence of the organisers in conducting the items in a proper

manner-. (iv) The morale of the participants and the parents has gone

down and no oppor[unity was given for a repeat of the programme. The

entire performance of the [eam of the complainants from the beginning to :

the end is recorded in the CD and if reguired it will be produced at the t

time of hearing. The said CD would,reveal that the complainants' fg36': :*:

could not get a fair opportunity to perform the item though all other teams

$ot a fair opportunity. (v) A request for a repeat performance was denied,

thereby denying a legitimate chance to get L't place in the programme.

(vi) The news regarding the maladministration of the organisers were

widely repor[ed in almost ati the dai]ies which would reveal that the

complainants' team could not get a fair opportunity to perform their event.

Ttre -qrqaqrsert-aaqld rrot pqg:tde*--a* laul

electricity and other technical supporL for the perfonnance of the team of

the complainants. (vii) As if adding fuel to fire there was callous

negligence on the part of the organisers who pulled down the curtain in

the midst of the performance and lifted again causing intermption to the

programme which adverseiy affected the performance result with

BB

improper assessmcnt of the' result. (viii) Though an appeal was f,led

immediately highliqhting all the grounds mentioned in the complaint, it

was not fairly considered but rejected without assigning any convincing

reason. (ix) With all the adverse conditions, the complainants' team was

given 'A',grade and placed in 3'd rank with a negligible difference in mark.

--j Had there been no interruption and technical snag the complainants' team

would have been adjudged as the best team and given first place with 'A'

grade.

16. In C. No.2212011, the allegation is that two teachers of the

Programme Committee forcibly pushed out the complainants from the

. stage and openly abused the parents of the complainants causing much

mental agony and humiliation to the contestants and their mothers who

. accompanied them.

L7. In C.No.ZOA],/20L1-, the complainant has produced a series of

documents through his Advocate. While producing those documents

* "feilewi *erylain*+he--

relevance of the said documents. 'The name of the parent who handed

over the undermentioned documents is L. Pradeep Kumar,

Thiruvananthapuram, T.C. 55/1 g42, P. Visrvambharan Road,

Pappanamcode P.O., Thiruvananthapuram. On his application under the

Right to Information Act, the credentials of the Judges for the items of

. "., .;i:il

B9

'Veena' and 'Tabala' along with the score sheets of the two. item. in the

Kerala State School Kalolsavom held at Kottayam on 18.1 .201 1 and.:

L9.1,20LL respectively, were issued to Mr. Pradeep Kumarvide forwarding

letter No.Y121720911,1 DPI dated 11.2.20LL. No doubt that the Judges for

the two items were eminent Artists, but in the score sheets where those

Judges had put:their marks with their signature, gross irregularities and

manipulations'are ,visible. For example item 613 - Veena for H.S.

General, 5l value points were noted vtz., A - fflloo 20 marks, B-otr{Blruo 2O

marks; C =-,(o3ptp 2O,marks, Dolglgmoi2Q marks and E . dS 20 marks- In ";

: score sheetwhichis numbered as page Nos. 7 & 8 the participant hearing

iode No.63, 25 marks out of 20 is seen given for value point No.D.

Similarly 25, out of 20 marks were given to Code No.95 and for the

. participant in Sl.No. 12 for the value of A. A very strange thing is that

marks were seen given only for 4 value points, though 5 parts were noted.

No marks are seen to have been given for the 5s value point o1g This

sco -bv-Smt,. S. Ruof ani, lh.--

same item of Veena 5 value points were noted and marks given. But for

the participant in serial i'.r.LL with Code No.95, the marks for value point

'A' anfl 'E' are seen manipulated with figrt:t' '"'7' t:,''t:',, ,... Lhe place of '7' I

each. The total marks gjiven first as '6' which is seen subsequently

corrected as 81 by adding'1' (10 marks) on the left side of '7'marks in

,t'{v,,'

90

value point'A'and 'E'. It is not known as to who had manipulated it. This

score sheet was handled by Sri. B. Sivakumar, Judge. In the case of the

item Tabala, the score sheet handled by Sri. Pandit and Sri, Hari, Judge, is

seen manipulated by over writings and corrections. In page No.18 for the

participant serial No.3 with Code No.41, he was first given 2 marks each

for the 5 value points from A to E. This figure of '2' in the 5 columns is

seen corr,ected as 'B'. The participant in serial No.4 with Code No.19 was

,given 4 marks'each for 5 value points, which:are Seen corrected as 'Bl each

to make a Uotal of;40.',The parLicipant in serial No.7 with'Code,No:68 was

"given 5 marks,eachfor 5 value points which is seen corrected as '10' each.

The participant in serial No.10 with Code No.46 and serial No.12 with

Code No.57, were given '7' marks each for the 5 value points which were

. subsequently corrected as''B'. Similarly participant in serial No.l with

Code No.54 was first given '6' each which was corrected as '8' each. The

above mentioned two items are only the example items to prove the gross

items staged in the State School Kalolsavom. This kind of extensive

cormption and favouritism by manipulating records, are in its superlative

form in all the items. The first place in most of the items are declared

under the hidden auction processed by accepting bribes. Incidentally it is

to be noticed that the documents produced include copy of the score

91

sheets prepared for the competition in Veena and Tabala in the I'.erala

State School Kalolsavom held at Kottayam on 18.1.2011 and 19.L.2011.'

18. Counsel appearing for the complainants submitted that

,money' plays a vital.role in tilting the balance and naturally the affluent

are the beneficiaries. Participants having genuine interest, talent and

potential are overtaken by students coming from reputed schools in the

urban areas. According to the counsel it is not mere talent or merit alone

that determines the ultimate result. The dark side of the Festival is that it

iS attracted , by undesirafte aia undue publicity, grace marks and :such

other advantag€s:, eqioyed by the winners and making the competitions

niore unfair and less sportive. Instead of harmony, unrt5r, amity and

cordiality what prevails among the participants is spitefulness,

belligerence and vindictivenes s.

19. Some complainants had approached this Forum alleging

cormpt practice on the part of the Departmental offrcers and the

Members of the panel of,:"qggl' ryu"i"g t"g

allegations, orders were passed directing the Investigating Agency

attached to this Fomm to enquire into the truth or falsity of the

;:,i*gii.'r.iirlii.:i" i:it.-,i;Clt.S i-"1;,-; ','. . --. t ''',"-t',.'.]:t-i,'.'; ,':i,tl:r:!-.-:: :':.:i'::'S ii:t""' iiii].+'"11'

came forward to give any direct evidence regarding the alleged demand of

bribe. When questioned by the Investigating Officer even the

G."'"'

92

complainants stated that allegations of cormpt practice were made relying

on hearsay information. No independent evidence was adduced by those

complainants before this Forum to substantiate their plea. Hence those

cases were dismissed.

2A. I have made mention of the above category of cases to

notice the fact that one cannot blindly believe the stateri{ents of the

complainants and indict or fi.nd fault with the'of;frcers and the organisers.

At the same titrne, we cannot shut.oqf eyes against the accusation of lapses

and deliberate rnanipulations alleged'to have,taken at various levels of the

Festival.

21. Submissions made by the Senior Government Pleader for

the respondents can be sgmmed up as follows: School Kalolsavam is

intended to afford fair opportunity to the students to exhibit their talents

in various performing arts and cultural activities in open stages. They

participate in a competitive and sporting spirit in the presence of their

high profile public men and members of the public. Persons proficient in

various art forms come to the venue of the competition and witness the

performance. From the .School level, the competition goes to the Sub

District Level,. then to the District Level and finally to the State Level.

Competitions become tougher and more intensive as they reach the

93

District Level and the State Level. IndMdual participants and the "eam

members of the group items perform their best to be adjudged as the top

scorer. They work hard spending valuable time, energy and money. It is

true that availability of adequate funds often becomes a major problem for

the organisers. It is also true that the affluent among the participants may

have got proper training. But the poor sections of the students are also

able to come to the top with the help of their teachers,'colleagues and

members of the public. As far as possible the Festival has to be conducted

free from fault and errors. Complaints about the non-compliance of the

guidelines in the Manual must be examined by the Director of Public

Instructions and appropnate remedial measures should be taken'

22. Both sides agree that if the guidelines laid down in the

Manual are earnestly follorved that alone will give a quietus to the

apprehensions and the grievances of a major section of ihe contestants.

No doubt, School Kalolsavam serves a dual puqpose. Students are allorved

*

the rnega festival. Simultaneously, their talents and proficiency in the

performi:ag arts ancl other forms of art are evaluated and duly recognised.

l.,iAi-i-:,.r: l;i',,':;r,iot., iul i]:ir r '...,:,.. :-lr,ji:r: Ci 3:gai.iSt;..; .1, i:,1-L;-.:rji;' 'it"ifkt:'t11

Committees and Sub Commi+"tees ensunng due representation for every

conceivabie section of ttre school level education. The question whether

fh -'/\q./

94

rnc aro diqc'hart s efficiently and sincerely)es are discharging their dutie

the above Committe

oftenarisesfordonsiderationduringeveryKalolsavamseason.Itisalleged:

thattherespondent.officebearershaveindulgedinmalpracticestor the favoured contestants' Want of

confer undeserryed benefits on f,ne rilvuur'

competenceandintegrifyisattributedtoJudgesCommittee.Serious

-.. comPlaints are ma

are unsuitabre for due performance of the art items. I'egal interference

by outsiders with .the malafide .intention of defeating meritorious

I ed the first Place' is also

contestants who ottt"n"ise would have secureo,t* : .::.'whohavecomplainedthatreasonable

alleged' There are students

^-o'o'. anoeals was denied on hyper technicalopportunity to prefer appeals wcrD '|L'rv'

grounds/objections. Again grievances arise from the non-speaking

.appellateordersasalsotheunfair,arbitraryandpartisandisposalofthe

appeals.Non-com*.,,,i"utio,,oftheappellateorderandbelated

. communication also give rise to grievances'

---- "--**r*-i, nq -g-qr4

quy"'g-t 9

-

rding those i" th" gdu"uttott

have been raised against the organisers inch

Department about their indifferellce, negligence and even lack of common

sense resulting in faulty and deflcient arrangements for staging various art

formsandentertainments,ItwouldappearthatSomeofthemhavenc

idea about the nature of the platfonn or stage where particular forrns o

. es ,i,

art are to be performed. Participants are constrained to perform group

dances and similar team items on stages designed and built to suit solo,

items. Contestants whose turn come towards the close of the competition !

end up their perfor4ance with utter disappointment due to the poor

qualrty materials used and the shalry nature of the platform. Those who

get the first 'chance to perforrn 6n such stages are lucky to escape the

painfulexperience.,Bythetimethe.remainingcontestantsstarttheiri

performance, the stage and the platform would become thoroughly r

-i

unsuitable and even dangerous to perform the item. Even if the organisers

aUd the judg€s or€,.conirinced of the defects and deficiencies in the

infrastructure, no opportunity is given to the participants to re-do the

performance on a proper platform. There ensues quarrels and bickerings

. affecting the friendly and congenial atmosphere of the show. Intermptions

and disturbances in the audio system is a complaint generally made by the

participants. Similar complaints have been made about the light system

caused by miscreants set up by ingenious participants to let down the rival

mischievotrs roles &rld tlia" ;wiir€ ,i iiie sciioc,. aurirorities and ihe

par[icipants are bringing their own mike operators with the connivance of

the offrcials to indulge in malpractices'

/-)|

27"

24. Complaints have been filed alleging that the Judges were

found attending calls made to them over mobile phones while the show

was on. Participan[s suspect that influentia] persons are contacting the

judges over phone so as to provide instant help to them to identify the

participants to be favoured with, Guideline in the Manual that the names

and the address of the judges who are included as expert persons in the

panel shall not be disclosed earlier than the commencement of the

competition - a provision cautious$ made to avoid attempts to influence

them - is observed by the Department in its breach than in its compliance.

25. Unhealthy competitions spoil the purpose of the festival.

Government have got the duff to preserve the dignity and the serenity of

the Kalolsavam if such festivals are meant for the benefit of the budding

talents among the school children. Unscrupulous interference by the

parents and the school au'thorities coupled with lack of deligence of the

officers to do away with such tendencies sends the wrong message that

-end-money p ower barrc, a-rol,e*o+layjMis-

is a sad state of affairs. Authorities must guard against such interferences

lest we plant the seeds of dejection, despondency and foul play in the

minds of the adolescents. Let the children feel confldent that virtue and

hard work do have its merits. Let not the tiny tots have the ill fortune to

learn evil lessons from their own parents and teachers. It is for the

i1 '/'I </'

I

executive government to play the lead role and evolve suitable

mechanisms to iron out the creases. Litigations and judicial interventions

are not the effective solutions in matters of this nature.

26. Cerlain remedial measures are highlighted hereunder.

27. There is need to en5ure that the guidelines in the Manual

are made knowil to the office bearers and the members of the organizing

committees, the members of the judges' committees as also the appeal

committee.

: 28. Sufficient number of copies of the Manual shall be made

available so as to enable the concerned to go through the same,

understand the importance of those guidelines and to implement them.

29. Needless to state that earnest efforts shall be taken by all

concerned to conduct School Kalolsavom as laid down in the Manual

issued by the Government.

f--.4t

30. Higher Levei Officers have got the duff and responsibility

r,-, .:i .-'-l' ',i eVOlVe SUitai,

:-: I rialolsavom. Servrc',

utilized for conducting

the Revenue District and

9B

the State Level competitions: They need not interfere with the activities

done by the Officers conce Festival at the

respective centers but can be present at the centers as silent observbrs.

They can submit reports to the DPI about the facts and events noticed by

them. Reports thus received by the DPI c.qn form the material along with

other relevant materiaJs for evaluating the functional efficiency of the-.-----

Organizing Committees and the District Level Officers. Random incojnito

vjsits also can be made by a team of Officers selected for that purpose.

These methods may be fruitful to prevent malpractices to some extent, Itmay bring down arbitrary and unjust decisions being taken and executed

by the authorities concerned. Reports received from the Officers who visit

the venue of the competition can be made use of to identi$r the guilty and

to take remedial measures. Those who violate the guidelines in the

Manual shall be made urrrru.rlble to the Heads of the Department and

subjected to disciplinary action in appropriate cases. No doubt, the

At the same time none shall have the notion or impression that

mischievous and unlawful actions done by them or indulged in by them will

go unnoticed. Everybody must feel that there is a competent authority

having control over the affqirs.

32. Offi.cers and members constituting the various sub

a

(<'''

99

committees shall be made answerable for serious lapses occurrin$ in the

respective fields of activity. For example, the sub committee in charge of

'stage and panthal' as also that in charge of 'light and sound' must ensure

that they carq/ out their job free from deficiency and fault. It may be

noticed that serious allegations have been made against the wbrking of the

aforesaid sub committees by almost all persons who have filedtomplaints.

This has 'given rise to the feeling that the sub committee for -'stage

and- t'- d

pantha} and also that for 'light and sound' arb not working satisfactorily. '

. If nonr availability of funds is the problem, that shall be asceftained by the

Government and the needful done to the extent possible.:

33. At the risk of repetition, it has to be stated that lack of

supervision by high level offrcers ls one of the reasons for the defects and

. deficiencies pointed out by the complainants in the conduct of the School

Kalolsavom. Organizing .o*rriitt"" consist of responsible persons

representing important institutions, But their involvement, barring a

e festi rseems+#--

very poor.

34. Organizing committees in general and, the sub committees

in parlii:,-iiar, ha-,"e g,r - '. . i:.ri;' e.;:i ;g::iil,ti:,ii-'.iiily tO prOvide b'::i"

infrastructure suitable for the art forms to be performed on the stage.

35, panel of judges shall be free from vitiating fabtors. Eminent

100

artists who adorn the seat of the judging committee shall not only ber-----------_

experts in the respective arl but also men of integrity. They must show the

courage to rise above partisan interests, bias and prejudice. Merit alone

hall be the criterion for awarding marks to the contesting students. Even

laymen know the principle that justice shall not only be done but must

appear to be done also.

36. No uniform practice is followed in the matter of

announcernent of the result of the competitions in the Sub District and the

District Level Competitions. Arrangements shall be made to ensure that

the results are published immediately so that not only the grades and the

"points but also the marks awarded to the contestants are made available to

the parties and all others' concerned. Failure to do so shall be made

punishable.

37. Members of the staff of the Education Department who are

entrusted with the duty to receive the appeals shall not be allowed to

arbitrarily deny the aggrieved persons the opporlunity to file appeals.

Aggrieved persons shall be permitted to remit the fees within the time

limit prescribed. As

-

far as competitions that are not concluded before

sunset, it would be just and reasoqable_-tg__a&Id the aggrieved persons

opportunity to file the appeal till the afternoon of the succeeding day.

38.' Some of the appeal committees are not disposing of the

101

appeal petitions within the stipulated time limit. Such violations shall be

taken serious note of. It is also seen that even in cases where timely

decision is taken in the appeals, the appellate order is not communicated

to the concerned persons at once.

39. Members of the appeal committee shall have the basic

lcrowledge as to how appeals are to be dealt wit}. In cases where the

dissatisfied contestants challenge the result of the competition on thex.,ii

ground ,of intermption in the suppty of electricity during the course of '

.q"_

their performancei appeals are disposed of stating that there was nothing

wrong in the marks awarded by the judges and that having regard to the

difference in marks between the top scorer and the appellant, there is no

need to allow the appeai. There are appeal committees which do not

believe in writing a speaking order. They, ' for the sake of brevity' dispose

of the appeal stating 'No merit lnl!9_qlqeal. 'Dismissed'. Such kind of

disposal is likely to be questioned as arbitrary.

persons including the members of the Judging Committee who are

amenable to influences and who are prdne to corrupt practices and are

yrelding ro extraneous corisidciations. If it is esiabiisi:;i on the bas:'s '-.:'

the enquiry . conducted by the higher authorities based on genuile

complaints frled by the contestants or the members of the public as also on

t02

the basis of reports filed by offrcers vested with the power to conduct

surprise visits including incognito that the allegations are true,

appropriate action must be taken against the delinquent persons. In cases

where delinquent persons fatl outside the disciplinary "onrrJli"Department or the Government, they shall be dealt with appropriately. In

lieu of disciplinary action penal action like black listing and debarring

them from functioning as the members of the Judging Committee andlor

the Appeal Committee of School Kalolsavam can be taken. Names andl-*=----R

addresses of persons who are black listed shall be

marks to all the

has

42. Defective and substandard electronic equipments shall not

_ be permitted to be uqed at _the venue of the competition. As far as

41.. The present system of awarding gracetI

llI

'li\/l

published/communicated to the officers of the- Education Department for

"information and necessary action.

contestants irrespective of their grade in evel titions

come up for criticism. These provisions call for review.

possible, Closed Circute Televisions can be installed at the venue of the

competition. Audio and video recording also can be done so that it can be

presewed in compact disc and replayed for reappraisal in deserving cases.

These facilities need not be confined to the State Level competitions but

are to be piovided at the District Level and the Sub District Level

(u--'

' ;fHffiS-l ii{-ffii.f! -... -F'ftffi.atF;:n"l{:!.:,

103

Competitions also.

43- It is open to the Government to consider whether there is

need for including few more guidelines in the Manual in the lines indicated

above.

44- Complaints are disposed of with the observations and

suggestions recorded above.

Copy of this report shall be forwarded to the principal

Seeretary to' Government, General',Education Department,' Secretariat,;

ThiruVananthapuram '' an{ .the r Difector of public , Instmctions,

Thimvananthapuram for information and necessary action.

JJUSTICE K.K.DENESAN, UPA LOK AYUKTA

Documents

LOKAYUKTA PRESEI'IT · By Advocate:-' Smt. Neena Jose A ' I .,': 1. Assistant Educational Officer, ,