LNG Canada Community Consultation Summary

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORT

LNG Canada-led Consultation: June 23 – July 15, 2014

August 2014

2 | LNG Canada – Consultation Summary Report August 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM – OVERVIEW 6

PURPOSE 7

METHODOLOGY 8

NOTIFICATION AND INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 9

PARTICIPATION 10

FEEDBACK RESULTS

Small Group Meetings – Key Themes 11

Feedback Form – Detailed Results 13

NEXT STEPS 18

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Minutes of Small Group Meetings

Appendix B: Discussion Guide and Feedback Form

Appendix C: Notification Methods

CONTENTS


3 week consultation program: June 24 – July 15

JUNE

25JUNE

24

69 FeedbackForms Submitted

62%15%

23%not at all

somewhatvery much

When asked 'to what degree the community felt LNG carriers could affect their use of the coastal waters off of Kitimat'

1 Open House & BBQ300+ Attendees

2 Small Group Meetings25 Attendees

1 4

52

3

Establishment of a community/environmental legacy fund

Suggestions for community infrastructure needs

Desire for water access opportunities

Economic opportunities including jobs & skills training

Concerns regarding environmental effects, particularly in the Kitimat River Estuary

Key topics of interest

90% Rated LNG Canada’s approach to community engagement as either excellent or good

CONSULTATION SUMMARY INFOGRAPHIC


EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThere is an overarching theme of optimism and support regarding the proposed LNG Canada project in Kitimat, B.C., and there continues to be a high level of interest in the opportunities that could benefit the local community—from jobs and economic development, to improved marine access and community infrastructure. That said, the community has voiced some concerns, particularly with respect to potential impacts on way of life, and the environmental effects of an LNG facility in Kitimat.

Between June 23 and July 15, 2014, LNG Canada hosted a number of events, including an open house and two workshops in Kitimat. The purpose of LNG Canada’s June/July 2014 community consultation was to ensure a broad-based understanding of the project—including its benefits and potential impacts—prior to the completion and filing of LNG Canada’s Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate, planned for later this year.

While LNG Canada has been consulting with the community since early 2012, this phase of consultation focused on sharing detailed information about the proposed site footprint through a 3-D site model. The consultation also obtained feedback on a number

of areas where LNG Canada was looking for specific input from the community, for the purposes of advancing project planning, and the environmental assessment.

Notification of events was provided through: advertisements in the local newspaper, door-to-door flyer delivery, email invitations, website postings, and road signage directing people to the events. A summary of notification and information sharing methods is provided on page 9 of this report.

More than 300 individuals participated in the three-week consultation period. Participation is summarized on page 10 of this report and highlights are provided in the following table:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EVENT PARTICIPATION

Open house 261 individuals signed in

Small group meeting #1

13 individuals attended, with representation from organizations such as Douglas Channel Watch, District of Kitimat, Kitimat Economic Development Association, Kitimat Housing Advisory Group, Kitimat Understanding the Environment, Northwest Community College and Kitimat Vocational Institute

Small group meeting #212 individuals attended with representation from organizations such as Rod & Gun Club, Royal Canadian Marine Search & Rescue, Kitimat Community Services Society and Northwest Community College

Feedback forms 69 feedback forms were submitted during the three-week consultation period


The following themes emerged throughout the various consultation activities from June 24 – July 15:

Water accessOne of the themes we heard repeatedly from the community was around the lack of public access to the waterfront in Kitimat. We sought input on what amenities/opportunities could enhance local recreation, and the community overwhelmingly identified the need for an affordable public boat launch, with parking and other amenities.

Training, employment, economic opportunitiesThere was a common request that LNG Canada work with local educational institutions to identify the specific skills and qualifications required to build local employment capacity, and ensure local hiring as much as possible. There was also general interest in economic development opportunities, and in understanding how the community stands to benefit.

Effects of marine shippingThere was moderate concern and interest expressed regarding LNG vessel traffic and interaction with fishing vessels and marine mammals in Douglas Channel. When asked to what degree the community felt LNG carriers could affect their use of the coastal waters off of Kitimat, 62% indicated “somewhat,” 15% indicated “very much,” and 23% indicated “not at all”.

Air qualitySeveral respondents indicated a strong interest in learning about the potential impacts to local air quality, and made suggestions around how to power the proposed facility. Concerns were also raised around the amount of sulphur dioxide emissions and the resulting cumulative impacts.

Community way of life Respondents made comments about housing availability and affordability, the price of goods and services, access to childcare, the influx of workers, and the increased strain on healthcare services and transportation infrastructure. Some participants indicated that there is already a current shortage of supplies in grocery stores. There was also a general interest in understanding what the legacy from the project would be for the community.

Habitat conservationSeveral participants were concerned about the potential loss of habitat for wildlife, including fisheries in the Kitimat River Estuary. There was general support for the creation of a legacy fund for fish, wildlife, and habitat—something that LNG Canada is currently exploring through community consultation and the regulatory process.

Community engagementA number of respondents commented they had no concerns, and indicated that the consultation efforts to date were sufficient. One respondent asked only that LNG Canada continue to engage with the community and take action from community feedback. Approximately 90% of respondents rated LNG Canada’s approach to community engagement as either “excellent” or “good”.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


1 Anticipated

STAGE OVERVIEW TIMING/STATUS

Pre-application: Initial engagement (Stage 1)

Stage 1 comprised the initial outreach to local government and key stakeholders in Kitimat and Terrace.

2011-mid-2013COMPLETE

Pre-application: Information sharing and consultation on draft AIRs (Stage 2A)

Activities during Stage 2A included a 30-day public comment period on the draft Application Information Requirements (AIRs), issuance of the final AIR by the BC Environmental Assessment Office (EAO), development of the application, and ongoing information sharing and consultation to understand and address potential project-related concerns.

June – December 2013COMPLETE

Pre-application: Information sharing and consultation prior to submission of application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate (Stage 2B)

Activities during Stage 2B have focused on ensuring broad-based engagement to share information and seek input on the proposed project, and to support the pre-application stage of the regulatory review, including consultation prior to submission of an application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate.

January – August 2014CURRENT

Application review (Stage 3)

This future stage will include ongoing information sharing including: holding stakeholder meetings to discuss key aspects of LNG Canada’s application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate and participating in the EAO’s Application Review public comment period.

Fall 20141

FUTURE STAGE

Ongoing community engagement (Stage 4)

Stage 4 will be focused on continued community engagement throughout various stages of the project and the post Environmental Assessment review.

Post-decision/ongoingFUTURE STAGE

STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM – OVERVIEW

LNG Canada’s commitment to ongoing community engagement and the requirements of the environmental assessment review process, is demonstrated through the establishment of an engagement and consultation program, designed to inform communities about project developments and encourage two‐way communication.

This program also gives us the opportunity to consult with communities and stakeholders to identify local interest, potential effects of the project, and ways to avoid or minimize these effects.

The following table outlines LNG Canada’s staged approach to consultation and engagement in support of the development and regulatory review of its proposed project.

STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM – OVERVIEW


PURPOSEThe purpose of LNG Canada’s June/July 2014 community consultation was to share updated project information, including preliminary site design, and to seek community input to include in LNG Canada’s application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate where appropriate, and to consider this feedback when finalizing project plans.

Feedback was sought on a number of topics including: Understanding and mitigating community concerns around project design

Environmental assessment and environmental management plans

Shipping and marine activities

Water access and recreational opportunities

Social investments

Building local capacity

Community engagement and consultation activities, including development of a Community Commitment document

Previous consultations introduced the proposed project to the public and stakeholders in communities in the vicinity and heard the residents’ interests, feedback and concerns in regards to the proposed project.

PURPOSE


METHODOLOGYLNG Canada used several methods to gather feedback from the community and other stakeholders.

Open house and BBQLNG Canada hosted an open house and barbeque at its Community Information Centre in Kitimat from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on June 24, 2014. The event was designed to share information about the proposed project, answer questions, and gather feedback on several topics. Guests were asked to sign-in upon entering the Information Centre, and were greeted by project representatives who showed them to the open house layout. While 261 people signed in, there were approximately 300 people in attendance. Display boards summarizing the consultation topics were set up around the Information Centre, and more than 25 LNG Canada representatives were on hand to answer questions about the project and its preliminary design.

Small group meetings/workshopsTwo workshops were held on June 25 at the Community Information Centre in Kitimat. The purpose of the meetings was to provide a more in-depth opportunity to discuss the project for those that wished to participate. The meetings included a round table discussion of consultation topics. LNG Canada provided short presentations on project design and the Environmental Assessment process, and then sought input on consultation topics. The workshops wrapped up with a discussion of next steps. Project representatives gave a PowerPoint presentation using the Discussion Guide to structure the discussion. The small group meetings were facilitated by a third party consultant. Minutes of the meetings are provided in Appendix A.

June 25 12:00pm - 2:30pm 13 participants June 25 6:00pm - 8:30pm 12 participants

Site modelLNG Canada developed a 3-D site model to provide community members with an understanding of the proposed site layout and its location in relation to the local community. The model was placed in the main

room of the Information Centre for the duration of the consultation period.2

Discussion guide and feedback formA discussion guide was developed to share project information including: the preliminary design and key features, shipping information, a summary of what we have heard to date from the community, the project schedule and several other areas we were seeking input on. The Discussion Guide was handed out at the open house and workshops, and included a feedback form to facilitate the collection of input. A deadline for feedback was set for July 15. The discussion guide and feedback form were also available online at lngcanada.ca and at the Information Centre. A detailed summary of feedback received is provided on page 13. A copy of the document is attached as Appendix B.

iPad stations Four iPad stations were set up at the Information Centre to provide additional project information through an LNG Canada project application. The application is frequently updated as new information is available and includes the preliminary site design/rendering and other relevant project information.

Project videoOpen house participants had the opportunity to view a video providing an overview of a recent live demonstration hosted by LNG Canada in the community. The demonstration featured real LNG, explained its properties, and discussed the science behind turning natural gas into a liquid. This video is available on LNG Canada’s website, lngcanada.ca.

2 The 3-D site model will be available for viewing in the Information Centre during opening hours until further notice.

METHODOLOGY


NOTIFICATION AND INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION

Notification about the consultation was provided through a variety of methods, including newspaper advertisements, door-to-door flyer delivery, email invitations, road signage, and on the LNG Canada website. For copies of notification methods, please see Appendix C.

Advertisements An advertisement was placed in the Kitimat Sentinel on June 11 and 18. The Kitimat Sentinel has a circulation to approximately 2,000 households and businesses.

NewsletterDetails of the community consultation were included in INFOCUS, LNG Canada’s newsletter, which was hand delivered to residences in Kitimat in May, 2014. It was also made available on the LNG Canada website and emailed to those who have signed up to receive project updates.

Email invitationOn June 17, targeted invitations were emailed to First Nations and stakeholder groups in Kitimat and Terrace, including local government, economic development organizations, environmental organizations, and educational institutions. Approximately 65 invitations were distributed.

Email notificationA reminder email was sent to LNG Canada’s email database on June 23, 2014.

Flyer deliveryOn June 23, the local Kitimat swim club hand delivered flyers door-to-door to notify community members of the Community Consultation events scheduled for June 24 and 25.

WebsiteNotification of the consultation, including events and availability of online materials was provided on LNG Canada’s website lngcanada.ca. Between June 23 and July 15 the website had 3,631 visits.

SignageSigns were placed at two locations along Haisla Boulevard, including at the entrance to the LNG Canada site, encouraging passersby to attend the June 24 event.

NOTIFICATION AND INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION


PARTICIPATIONIn total, more than 300 individuals participated in the consultation activities as outlined in the following table:

EVENT PARTICIPATION

Kitimat event/open house 261 individuals signed in


13 individuals attended, with representation from organizations such as Douglas Channel Watch, District of Kitimat, Kitimat Economic Development Association, Kitimat Housing Advisory Group, Kitimat Understanding the Environment, Northwest Community College and Kitimat Vocational Institute


12 individuals attended with representation from organizations such as Rod & Gun Club, Royal Canadian Marine Search & Rescue, Kitimat Community Services Society and Northwest Community College

Feedback forms69 feedback forms submitted during the three-week consultation period

Website access162 unique page views of the Community Consultation page on lngcanada.ca during the consultation period

PARTICIPATION


FEEDBACK RESULTSThe primary method of collecting input was through two facilitated small group meetings, the open house, as well as a printed feedback form which was available between June 23 and July 15 at all consultation events and online at lngcanada.ca. A total of 69 feedback forms were submitted. Feedback is summarized below in two parts – a key theme summary of comments and questions from each of the small group meetings, and a detailed summary of input submitted through feedback forms.

Small Group Meetings – Key Themes

The following provides a key theme summary from the two small group meetings held as part of the consultation. The minutes from the meetings, including comments and questions from meeting participants is provided in Appendix A of this report.

Small group meeting #1 June 25, 12:00pm – 2:30pm LNG Canada Community Information Centre

Waste management – Participants expressed concern regarding the impacts of industry and increased population on the water supply and waste management systems. Specific concerns included burning of waste by local industry, the disposal of reusable materials, the capacity of the local landfill and the associated bird and rodent problems resulting from food waste.

Habitat conservation – Participants expressed concerns regarding the proximity of the site layout to the Kitimat River, and requested moving the site layout back from the river to allow for river access and passage of wildlife.

Effects of marine shipping – Participants expressed concern regarding vessel traffic and interaction with fishing vessels and marine mammals in Douglas Channel.

Training and employment – Participants expressed concerns regarding the relationship between international and local unions, and the potential benefits received by transient workers versus those received by local workers (i.e. flights). Participants showed a common interest in hiring locally and requested that LNG Canada work with local educational institutions to identify the specific skills and qualifications required to build local employment capacity.

Effects on local infrastructure – Participants expressed specific concerns regarding the shortage of food in grocery stores, especially in situations of extreme weather, and concerns about the cumulative impacts on traffic patterns.

Water access – Participants voiced concerns regarding the lack of public access to the water, and expressed the community need for a public boat launch. Several participants suggested improvements to the usage of Minette Bay.

FEEDBACK RESULTS


Small group meeting #2 June 25, 6:00pm – 8:30pm LNG Canada Community Information Centre

Legacy fund for fish, wildlife and habitat – Participants expressed concerns around the loss of fish, wildlife, and habitat and suggested that fish, wildlife, and a general appreciation of nature are key reasons some of the people live in Kitimat. In this regard, participants discussed, and were generally supportive of, the idea of creating a legacy fund and/or an advisory committee. Many participants expressed interest in participating further.

Water access – Participants expressed concern regarding the lack of water access, the severe overcrowding, the high costs of the current marina and boat launch, and the shortage of parking.

Training and employment – Representatives from local employment and educational institutions asked LNG Canada to define project employment requirements to ensure local community members are adequately qualified and eligible for positions. One respondent requested that LNG Canada undertake an apprenticeship program, and another talked about the problems faced by people who want to work but are told they do not qualify— either because they are a recent graduate with no experience, or are an experienced worker without any official training or education. One participant asked that when hiring, LNG Canada hire the “right person for the job” versus hiring based on the level of education attained.

Integration of temporary workers into the community – Several participants expressed concern regarding the presence of a large number of temporary workers in the community and their potential disregard for rules (i.e. buying a fishing license, substance abuse). Potential solutions were suggested, including the strict reinforcement of rules and an employment contract with a zero-tolerance policy.

FEEDBACK RESULTS

13 | LNG Canada – Consultation Summary Report July 2014

Feedback Form Results3

The following section provides detailed results from the 69 feedback forms submitted between June 24 and July 15. A copy of the feedback form is provided in Appendix A for reference.

Understanding and mitigating community concerns1. Participants were asked in an open-ended question

what additional areas of interest or concern, if any, should LNG Canada should be aware of.

The following represents a key theme summary from the 39 respondents who provided comments.

Infrastructure and services – Respondents made comments regarding the importance of transportation and infrastructure upgrades, with a suggestion that LNG Canada share its airport shuttle with local residents. There were general concerns about the potential impacts on water, sewer, and solid waste services as a result of increased local population during construction.

Environment – Respondents had general concerns about the safety of the environment, the safe passage of wildlife, and the importance of the Kitimat River.

Community health and well-being – Respondents made comments about accommodation and housing costs, the price of goods and services, access to childcare, the influx of transient workers, and the increased strain on healthcare services and infrastructure. They also expressed an interest in understanding what the legacy from the project would be for the community.

Economic conditions – There was general interest expressed in local employment and training opportunities, as well as concerns around potential impacts to local tourism.

Consultation process – A number of respondents said they had no concerns, giving a strong indication that the consultation efforts to date were sufficient. One respondent asked only that LNG Canada continue to engage with the community and take action from community feedback.

Project design2. Participants were asked to review the section of the

Discussion Guide featuring the site model, and were given the opportunity to ask questions about the project design.


Project layout and the environment – There were several questions submitted regarding power supply. Respondents made comments regarding the safety radius around the facility and potential impacts on the passage of wildlife, wildlife habitat, migratory birds, and fish habitat. Several respondents were complimentary of the site layout and were happy to see remaining access to the channel.

Access to water and estuary – Many respondents asked about local access to water and the Kitimat River Estuary. One suggested improving access to, and recreational usability of, Minette Bay.

Safety – Several respondents expressed general safety concerns regarding the facility and the marine shipping aspects of the project.

Environmental assessment3. Participants were asked which study areas, if any,

they were most interested in learning about during the public review of LNG Canada’s application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate later this year.

The following represents a key theme summary from the 41 responses.

Economic opportunities – A large number of respondents expressed interests in employment and training opportunities for local residents. They also wanted to know about the benefits to Kitimat and the surrounding area for hosting a project of this type.

Air quality – The majority of respondents indicated a strong interest in learning about the impact to local air quality, and made suggestions around how to power the proposed facility. They also shared concerns around the amount of sulphur dioxide emissions and the resulting cumulative impacts.

3 A total of 69 feedback forms were submitted, however not all respondents completed each question and therefore the total number of responses to each question varies.

FEEDBACK RESULTS


Noise – Participants expressed interest in learning about the potential noise effects from the facility, including during the construction and operational phases.

Kitimat River – People shared concerns regarding water extraction from the Kitimat River and the resulting effects to fish runs. Suggestions were also provided for potential habitat restoration efforts.

Marine – Participants expressed concerns about vessel traffic interactions with marine resources, as well as the cumulative effects of shipping activities from numerous projects.

Community health and well-being – Respondents indicated they would like to learn more about community safety, health, and the social impacts of the project.

4. Participants were asked in an open-ended question what advice or guidance they would have for LNG Canada for the development of environmental management plans.


Access to river – Some respondents requested that access along the river be provided, with enough room for passage of humans and wildlife. Respondents expressed concern regarding potential effects to fisheries.

Disturbance of Kitimat River – Respondents asked that LNG Canada be aware of how much water is taken from the Kitimat River and not to take in excess, so as to avoid disturbing river species and habitat.

Safety and effects of the environment on the project – Several respondents indicated that safety was of paramount concern, and another voiced concern regarding the proximity of the facility to water in cases of extreme weather. There was also concern that the facility would be built on an estuary.

Water access – A number of respondents indicated interest in community access to the river and waterfront. Suggestions included: a beach, a public boat launch and parking area, and a public marina.

Planning process – Five respondents indicated they approved of LNG Canada’s process thus far in planning the proposed project layout.

Environmental management – One respondent suggested partnering with academic researchers to establish long-term environmental monitoring, while another suggested consulting with fish hatchery experts as part of the development of environmental management plans.

Shipping/marine environment5. Participants were asked to which degree they thought

LNG carriers in the Douglas Channel could affect their use of the coastal waters off Kitimat.

The following represents the results from the 61 respondents to this question:

62%15%

23%

somewhat

not at all

very much

The following represents a summary from the 31 respondents who provided additional information about their use of Douglas Channel:

TYPE OF USAGENUMBER OF MENTIONS

Fishing 16

Boating 5

Sightseeing 3

Beach 3

Marine search & rescue 1

Hunting 1

FEEDBACK RESULTS


Approach to social investment6. Participants were asked in an open-ended question

to suggest ideas for social investments that would benefit the community of Kitimat.


Community living – Affordable housing was one of the most frequently mentioned ideas for social investment. Also noted were childcare, investment in the local soup kitchen, and a bus service between Terrace and Kitimat. One respondent asked to share the shuttle bus LNG Canada currently uses for its employees travelling from the Terrace airport to the proposed site in Kitimat.

Recreation – Other frequently mentioned ideas were related to access to the water and a new marina. Respondents also indicated an interest in community amenities such as a bowling alley, theatre, and community garden. Respondents also requested upgrades to local parks, campgrounds and the unique Kitimat walkway system.

Jobs – Many respondents indicated they wanted to see employment opportunities from the project for local people and youth. Suggestions also included LNG Canada partner with post-secondary institutions to provide training and scholarships.

Environment – Some respondents indicated an interest in an environmental legacy fund.

Building local capacity7. Participants were asked for additional suggestions

about programs and initiatives to help local residents and businesses become qualified for opportunities with the project.


Local business involvement – Respondents asked that LNG Canada invest in local businesses and notify them of opportunities through a small business/contractor registry. They also asked for a fair process to select qualified suppliers, and that LNG Canada learn from the missteps of other projects in the area.

Education and training – Many respondents indicated the need for training opportunities and in some cases, funding and scholarships for those who are willing to undertake training. Suggestions were also made around

supporting local educational institutions to develop or rejuvenate their programs to ensure students meet the necessary requirements of LNG Canada.

Hire local – Many respondents reinforced the importance of hiring locally. One person noted the importance of hiring the right person for the job, instead of hiring based on level of education.

Water access/recreational opportunities8. Participants were asked to select which of the

following recreational activities they take part in most frequently in the Kitimat area:

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

Walking/hiking

Kayaking/canoeing/boating

Recreational fishing

Bird watching

Hunting

TYPE OF USAGE

NU

MBE

R O

F M

ENTI

ON

S

Additional comments:

Seven respondents indicated that they did not participate in any of the activities.

For the 16 respondents that indicated ‘other’, the following activities were noted (in order of frequency):

- use of all-terrain vehicles and dirt bikes - cycling - camping - spending time on the beach - golfing - skiing and sledding - spending time in nature

FEEDBACK RESULTS


9. Participants were asked an open-ended question about what amenities could enhance their recreational use of the Kitimat area.


Water access and recreation – Several respondents replied that the community needed amenities so people could enjoy the waterfront and waterways, and they made suggestions including: a public boat launch with parking, a new marina, and new public access to the waterfront (both the ocean and Kitimat River). A number of respondents suggested making trails for walking and biking.

Community infrastructure – Many respondents wanted to see improvements to community infrastructure, including roads, fire hall, restaurants, stores, social centres, fitness facilities, a water park and an upgraded soup kitchen. Some also suggested support for the Hirsch Creek Golf and Country Club.

Community Commitment document10. Participants were asked to review the Discussion

Guide section on the Community Commitment document, and to comment on the draft of the key themes. They were also asked to provide feedback or comment on the themes and suggest any additional themes that LNG Canada should consider.


Community involvement – A number of respondents commented that the consultation process thus far had been positive, and asked that LNG Canada continue to involve the community and follow through on the commitments made.

Environment –Several respondents voiced concerns around impacts on the environment, and asked that LNG Canada invest in ways to protect fish, and minimize impacts to the air shed. One respondent suggested that LNG Canada sponsor the fish hatchery or a “First Salmon or First Eulachon” Festival.

Social – Several respondents asked for help with the town soup kitchen, improvements to recreation and seniors’ facilities, and subsidies to help low-income renters.

Approach to community engagement11. Participants were asked to rate LNG Canada’s

approach to community engagement and to explain their selection.

The chart below is a summary of the 60 respondents who answered this question.

45%

5%

Excellent

45%Good

Fair5%Needs

improvement

The following represents a key theme summary from the 19 respondents who explained their rating:

Community consultation – Almost all of the respondents provided positive feedback about the organization of the community consultation program and LNG Canada’s approach to consulting with local government, stakeholders, and the community.

Public perception of LNG Canada – Several respondents indicated that LNG Canada was the most forthcoming in providing information to the public, and making the effort to understand community concerns. One respondent stated, “People want to like you – you’re the best of the companies that want to develop this area – but they will need more assurance about fish, noise, safety and fire and explosion hazards.” Another said that this was an “all time first for this community and seems an honest and forthright attempt to explain what will be involved.”

Areas for improvement – A few respondents expressed interest in holding more community meetings and information sessions, and thought LNG Canada should post more advertisements and notifications to ensure community members are informed of opportunities to participate.

FEEDBACK RESULTS


12. Participants were asked an open-ended question about what, if anything, LNG Canada could be doing to improve its community engagement.


Public outreach – Several respondents suggested more consistent use of social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, as well as using additional advertising to announce events and project updates. Respondents also asked that LNG Canada host more public forums like the June Open House, and consider using the City Centre Mall for events. One respondent asked that LNG Canada hold events in Terrace.

Consultation – Many respondents indicated they were very happy with community engagement efforts and approach thus far. Several respondents suggested identifying opponents and addressing their concerns, another suggested that LNG Canada share past experiences including how issues were resolved. Another suggested facilitating a trip to an operating LNG facility for interested and knowledgeable non-governmental community members.

Safety – A few respondents suggested more discussions about safety in consultation, as well as hiring a local environmental specialist as an advisor.

13. Participants were asked how likely they would be to participate in the following potential communications and engagement activities as the project progresses.

Respondents indicated that they were either very likely or somewhat likely to participate in open

houses (86%), online surveys (68%), participate in a Community Advisory Committee (70%) and in focus groups (73%). 51% of respondents indicated they were very likely or somewhat likely to submit a comment as part of the Environmental Assessment process. See Fig 1.

Additional comments14. Participants were asked an open-ended question

about if they needed any additional information or if they had any additional comments on the proposed LNG Canada project.

The following represents a key theme summary from the 14 respondents who provided additional comments:

LNG Canada – Many respondents provided positive feedback in regards to LNG Canada’s openness and approach to community consultation, in particular, information sharing efforts such as the 3-D site model and the LNG 101 demonstration.

Training and employment opportunities – Several participants reinforced the need for training and hiring locally.

Environment – One participant expressed general concerns regarding impacts to the environment, including the future of hunting and fishing. Another respondent expressed concern about the safety of the project. One participant also suggested moving the power generating station away from the facility to address air-quality concerns.

FEEDBACK RESULTS

Attending an open house

Participating in a focus group

Community Advisory Committee

Submitting comments as part

of the EA

Online surveys at Ingcanada.ca

Very likely Somewhat likely Neither likely/nor unlikely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Fig 1: Likelihood of participating in consultation activities


NEXT STEPSThis report summarizes feedback received as part of LNG Canada’s Community Consultation held between June 23 and July 15, 2014.

The LNG Canada project team, including environmental consultants, will review all input summarized in this report, such that it can be considered in project planning, the Environmental Assessment process, and in the development of communications and consultation programs, where applicable.

In the months leading up to submission of the Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate, the LNG Canada team will continue to engage with the local community. This engagement will include organizing meetings with stakeholder groups and planning for information sharing and consultation regarding the application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate. We anticipate LNG Canada’s application will be submitted later this year.

NEXT STEPS

LNG Canada – Consultation Summary Report August 2014

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Minutes of Small Group Meetings

1

MEETING DETAILS

LNG Canada Project – Community Consultation, June 2014 Small Group Meeting #1 June 25, 2014 12:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. LNG Canada Community Information Centre, Kitimat, BC

PURPOSE Notes from a Small Group Meeting for the LNG Canada Project Community Consultation held on June 25, 2014 at the LNG Canada Community Information Centre, Kitimat, BC.

FACILITATOR Jennifer Davies, Consultant

MEETING RECORDER Katie Baker, Consultant

PRESENTERS Wim Ravesloot, Project Director, LNG Canada Jane Newlands, Community Consultation and Social Performance Manager, LNG Canada

ATTENDEES (13) Local Community Members, Stakeholders and Government

PROJECT TEAM ATTENDEES

Martin Barnes, Operations Lead, LNG Canada Joan Goldhawk, Local Content Advisor, LNG Canada Russell Morrison, Senior Environmental Planner, LNG Canada (arrived later) Mary-Ellen Proctor, Community Liaison Officer, LNG Canada Ruth Sulentich, Senior Public Consultation Advisor, LNG Canada Seiichi Tsurumi, Manager, Stakeholder Engagement, JV for LNG Canada Susan Bruckner, Consultant

AGENDA

1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Consultation and Project Overview 3. Project Design and Site Layout – Q & A 4. Environmental Assessment Overview 5. Consultation Topics and Group Discussion – Q & A 6. Feedback Form 7. Wrap-Up and Next Steps

2

KEY THEMES

x Waste management x Habitat conservation x Impact of speed/wake/cumulative effects on marine/shore areas x Training and employment

The meeting was called to order at 12:00 pm. (The following abbreviations will be used in the meeting record – Q: Question, A: Answer, C: Comment)

1. WELCOME AND REVIEW OF AGENDA

Mary Ellen Proctor welcomes and thanks participants for attending. She acknowledges the Haisla for welcoming us into their territory and delivers a safety briefing to the group.

Jennifer Davies introduces herself as facilitator and thanks participants for attending. She passes around a sign-in sheet and asks participants to write their names on the tent cards provided. She then reviews the agenda. Round table introductions follow.

Jane Newlands introduces herself and talks about the importance of community involvement in project planning. Jane introduces Wim Ravesloot, Seiichi Tsurumi, Joan Goldhawk, Ruth Sulentich, Martin Barnes, Mary-Ellen Proctor and Susan Bruckner. Jane reviews the purpose of the meeting; to hear what participants have to say, and to give updated Project information. She mentions site model downstairs and points out display boards around the room.

2. PRESENTATION – Project Overview and Project Design

Jane Newlands reviews slides and explains the Joint Venture behind LNG Canada, provides a Project Update: Where We’ve Come From/Where We Are Going, the Upstream Gas Supply and the National Energy Board license. Highlights milestones: Joint Venture Agreement, and the CSFW contract announcement held in Kitimat in May.

Wim Ravesloot reviews slides illustrating the Project Design, siting rationale and reviews the LNG Facility/Marine Terminal Siting – Key Considerations slide. Discusses the safety, land and gas supply considerations. Explains that the pipeline from Groundbirch to Kitimat through the mountains is one of the shortest pipelines being proposed. Discusses gas supply and the change in market from the American market to overseas. Explains proposed facility layout.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if any of the buildings illustrated on the proposed facility layout are pre-existing, or if all buildings would be built new.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Answers that mostly all buildings will be new.

3

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if LNG Canada currently owns the haul road.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Explains that LNG Canada has an agreement with Rio Tinto Alcan (RTA) in place regarding the land and harbour space needed for the Project.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the existing tanks on-site will be demolished and removed.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Confirms that the existing tanks will be removed. Explains that LNG Canada will make use of some of the existing facility, but that most of it will be removed.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the rail yard will provide service to the valley.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Responds that the requirement for rail capacity has not yet been determined and is still under design and consideration. The reason for having the railway is to export any liquid by-products. Acknowledges the rail safety concerns in Canada in light of recent tragedies, and notes that LNG Canada shares in those concerns. Adds that LNG Canada will ensure to meet any and all regulatory standards for safety.

Wim Ravesloot reviews slides regarding the Proposed Marine Wharf.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the existing Methanex jetty will be connected to the materials offloading facility and if LNG Canada owns the property connected with the wharf.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Responds that the wharf will not be altered, as it is an RTA facility, but that the material offloading area is owned by LNG Canada.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the supply of natural gas is ‘fracked gas’ or from the well. Notes that ‘fracked gas’ does not last very long.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Responds that likely a mixture would be used.

C: Jane Newlands: Explains the gas export license and that LNG Canada would primarily be receiving gas from the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin through the interconnected gas system so gas would come from a variety of sources. However, a significant portion will likely be fracked gas as that is the common technology for gas extraction in BC.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the National Energy Board (NEB) application and how gas will be distributed among all of the proposed projects.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that the NEB generally looks at the supply of gas in Canada compared to the amount of gas committed in terms of export licenses granted when approving new applications.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks where LNG Canada is on the NEB list.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that the NEB approved LNG Canada’s export license in 2013.

Q: Meeting Participant: Notes that climate change could lead to significantly increased sea levels and asks what factors LNG Canada has applied to accommodate this change.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that LNG Canada’s Application for an Environmental Assessment will include an assessment of potential “Effects of the Environment on the Project.”

4

Jane Newlands reviews the environmental assessment process and status update slides.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks when the Application will be ready for review.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that LNG Canada is hoping to have the Application submitted this fall.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks how the environmental permitting timeline fits in with the announcement of the provincial government using the air shed assessment report. Asks if LNG Canada will wait for that announcement before officially submitting their Application.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that LNG Canada anticipates filing its application later this year and is currently looking at the current and available guidelines.

C: Russell Morrison: Explains that waiting on a guidelines decision could take some time and that LNG Canada is preparing to file the Application when all is ready, ensuring to design for future criteria. Notes that this is strictly an Application at this point, and that project design will continue to develop, as the requirements are better understood. Explains further that the Application is our best understanding of things at the time of submission but does not mean it is set in stone.

C: Seiichi Tsurumi: Notes that the fiscal tax LNG portion will impact the decision whether or not to take FID, but that decision will come much later than the EA study.

Jane Newlands explains the scope of LNG Canada’s Environmental Assessment. The facilitator opens up the floor for any questions or clarifications.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if there is any discussion regarding impacts of the camp. Explains that bringing in 5500 – 7500 employees for construction doubles the size of the community. Expresses concern regarding water used and waste produced. States the need for a plan coordinated with the town and region.

A: Meeting Participant: Talks about the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) and how it is one of the topics to be discussed at this meeting regarding feedback and proposed action.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the number of LNG processing units (trains). Notes that the model showed four trains, but the slide talks about two.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that while the initial project will consist of two trains it is planned for the ability to expand to four trains.

Q: Meeting Participant: Notes that the overview of the laydown area looks large. Says that expanding to four trains will take away more area for mammals and other species.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Explains that Shell has built various LNG projects in the world and has carefully benchmarked the space to be very tight so to not take away more space than is absolutely necessary and also to keep expenses low.

C: Meeting Participant: Reads aloud a written comment from Cheryl Brown of the Douglas Channel Watch. Please see Appendix A for her comment.

C: Jane Newlands: Notes that these topics will be included as part of the Application.

C: Meeting Participant: Comments that the model shows that the pipeline will be elevated allowing bears to pass underneath, but that the haul road is elevated, forcing bears to go up and over.

5

C: Jane Newlands: Explains that discussion of wildlife corridors will be incorporated into the Application and will include how construction activities will affect these species. Adds that LNG Canada is looking for ideas around conservation areas, bird watching areas etc.

C: Meeting Participant: Comments that there is not enough room between the Project site and the river and asks if the project area could be moved back from the river or condensed. Notes that this consideration would mean a lot to the community.

C: Wim Ravesloot: Thanks Lucy McRae for raising this concern and explains that the corner of the site represents the existing corner from Methanex.

C: Meeting Participant: Expresses concern that the areas between the site and the river are too tight and that bears are currently being affected.

A: Russell Morrison: Explains that the fill from the original Methanex site would have to be extracted and once extracted, it is not clear what might be found under that fill and it is not clear that the former vegetation would be re-established.

C: Susan Bruckner: Suggests arranging a specific facilitated discussion on this potential impacts on wildlife (e.g. grizzly bears) and asks Terry to speak with her about this before leaving the meeting.

Q: Meeting Participant: Requests a copy of the meeting minutes.

A: Susan Bruckner: Explains that the meeting minutes form part of the consultation record which will be made available as part of the consultation report. Offers to distribute a copy of the meeting record as well as the presentation slides to all attendees following the completion of the consultation program.

Jane Newlands reviews the topics for consultation on the group discussion slide. The facilitator asks participants to look at pages 6-7 of the discussion guide.

Q: Meeting Participant: Expresses concern regarding solid waste. Says that waste from a two train processing unit is very different from a four-train unit. Talks about the amount of waste that RTA burns due to an apparent lack of planning and that much of the waste was reusable material. Suggests there needs to be a dedicated plan to deal with the amount of waste, especially considering feeding 5000 – 7000 people. Concerns about sending waste to the landfill and the associated bird and rodent problems. Asks if LNG Canada is working with other projects in the region to develop waste management plans. Notes there is more than just solid waste, including paper, cardboard, tin, plastics, wrappings, shipping materials.

C: Meeting Participant: Adds that there are two different types of waste – camp waste and industry waste.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that LNG Canada is putting together a waste management plan and are looking for input and suggestions.

C: Meeting Participant: Explains that Kitimat has its own plan for solid waste handling and recycling but does not have the capacity to handle this amount of waste.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that capacity would have to be built to handle this amount of food waste.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the project timeline.

6

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that LNG Canada will file the application in the fall and hope to get a decision within a year. Says that if all goes well and the project takes FID, LNG Canada would go forward with the base project, consisting of an approximate four-year construction period.

C: Meeting Participant: Adds that the Regional District is not prepared for the project and resulting waste.

C: Meeting Participant: Adds that the Regional District has a policy about not taking industrial waste.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks what the community currently does with all recyclable materials.

A: Meeting Participant: Responds that KUTE takes any paper, cardboard and electronics and the bottle depot takes paper and packaging waste but are a very small facility.

C: Meeting Participant: Adds that there are places in Terrace that accept metal.

C: Meeting Participant: Suggests having a compactor to squash all material for easy transportation.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the meaning of a “Full-service self-contained camp with sewer and water.”

A: Russell Morrison: Explains that the camp would be self-contained and have its own treatment system on site.

C: Meeting Participant: Suggests that if water will be drawn from the Kitimat River, it will be filled with sediment and that there is an old water treatment system at Eurocan with a substantial amount of capacity.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about camp location and how it will be expanded. Adds that sewage from the RTA camp is going into the city system.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Explains that the camp location has not yet been decided.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about air traffic and if there will be a specific airline added for capacity.

C: Meeting Participant: Notes discussions around expanding the airport.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the potential for a second river crossing.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that the provincial government is undertaking traffic studies that will consider the demand from all proposed projects and that the studies will feed into the Application review. Adds that the Application will also examine potential impacts to roads, railway and airports.

Jane Newlands summarizes the issues raised to date and asks about any comments on these topics.

Q: Meeting Participant: Expresses concern regarding a lack of food in grocery stores and asks if the camps will be bringing in their own food.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that in extreme weather situations, the highway can be unusable. Adds that in extreme weather, food shortages occur quickly.

7

C: Meeting Participant: Suggests that running a barge from Vancouver to Kitimat would be cost-effective. Expresses concerns regarding traffic and asks that employers coordinate efforts to ensure not all workers are starting and finishing their workday at the same time.

A: Meeting Participant: Responds that the camp would ideally be situated so to not require the use of local roads and would consider worker scheduling.

The facilitator asks participants to review pages 8 - 9.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about ship interaction between other projects and RTA. Expresses concern regarding the amount of ships using the waterway.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that similar to the provincial government roadwork study, LNG Canada will be involved in the TERMPOL process. Through that process Transport Canada reviews project activities in light of existing marine traffic and makes recommendations on navigational improvements and marine safety.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks what Transport Canada is responsible for given that Kitimat is a private port.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that Transport Canada has been in discussions with the local community and First Nations around future port governance.

C: Meeting Participant: Says the Federal government made an announcement about making Kitimat into a public port.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that the port is currently private and that it is very difficult to take private land and make it public.

C: Meeting Participant: Expresses concern regarding the large fishing fleets that the LNG carriers would intersect.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about marine traffic during phase one of the Project.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that during phase one there will be one ship every other day and one per day at full build-out.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that people want access to the water and expresses concern about current access.

C: Meeting Participant: Requests having a separate meeting with project team and with people from Finn Island regarding whales. Notes Finn Island residents have developed extensive knowledge of marine mammals over the past 12 years and that the number of whales has increased in the past 5-7 years.

A: Russell Morrison: Explains that the EA will address the cumulative effects of ships and traffic.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if birds are being included and expresses concern regarding endangered birds and the effects of wake on the foreshore.

C: Meeting Participant: Expresses concern about wash from tankers.

C: Meeting Participant: Voices wake related concerns about disturbing marine mammals as ships enter and exit.

A: Russell Morrison: Explains that LNG carriers are designed to produce very little wake and the expected wake within 200 meters of a vessel would be about 15 - 20 centimetres.

8

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about vessel speeds within the channel.

A: Russell Morrison: Responds that vessels will run between 12-14 knots in most areas and explains that the study will be done using the “worst case”.

Q: Meeting Participant: Says that two years ago there was a ship sailing from Kitimat out that lost control by hitting rocks or ground.

A: Russell Morrison: Responds that all LNG carriers will be escorted by tugs in case of power failure or an emergency.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about measuring the wake from carriers.

A: Russell Morrison: Explains that LNG Canada is undertaking its wake study to try to remove some of the uncertainties that normally surround mathematical models. LNG Canada will study a variety of other existing vessels as part of its study to help the reader validate the LNG Canada wake model results as true and should then give them greater comfort that the same model is providing true information on LNG carrier wake as well.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if there is any regulation on wake?

A: Russell Morrison: Answers there are no regulations. Explains the LNG Canada wake study will use fluid dynamics which are a more sophisticated modelling technique and that the LNG Canada wake study will examine a variety of vessels, weather and related wake.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks what wind models would be used and notes that Douglas Channel Watch is having problems with wind monitors that have been placed by the Enbridge project.

The facilitator asks participants to review page 13 of the Discussion Guide.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the location of tugboats and expresses concern about the refueling of tugboats.

A: Wim Ravesloot: Responds that tug operations, including requirements for re-fueling will be contracted to a third party.

C: Meeting Participant: Comments that refueling is a concern regardless of where it happens.

C: Meeting Participant: Discusses Anderson Creek as an important spawning channel and how all impacts to the environment will impact habitat and rearing habitat specifically. Adds that salmon are attractive for a large amount of bears and believes the bears will come through the facility searching for salmon.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the dyke was built by RTA and if the bears would be able to use the dyke.

A: Russell Morrison: Responds that there are many documented photographs of bears using the dykes. Explains that currently, the dyke is stopping all of the tidal flows inbound and fresh water flows are stopping on the upside of the dyke. Adds that LNG Canada is proposing to make openings to allow movement of water through there while allowing bears to traverse over tops. These proposed breaks need to be discussed with RTA who originally constructed the dyke.

9

C: Meeting Participant: Requests that habitat enhancement measures can be discussed in a workshop.

Q: Meeting Participant: Suggests a discussion between LNG Canada and RTA regarding the congestion and use of Minette Bay. Adds that an improvement to the usage of Minette Bay would be very meaningful to the community as the bay has value and can be enhanced.

C: Meeting Participant: Concern with power boats in Minette Bay. States there is no public waterfront access as it is all used by private companies. Notes that a lot of people like to use it for a variety of reasons.

The facilitator asks participants to review page 21 of the Discussion Guide regarding water access.

C: Meeting Participant: Suggests building road access to Jessie Lake.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if LNG Canada is the landowner of waterfront property, would they consider giving the public access to the water to address the shortage.

C: Meeting Participant: Suggests public access to an LNG Canada controlled piece of land just north of the current dock that is accessed off the haul road.

Q: Facilitator: Asks what kind of amenities could be there.

A: Meeting Participants: Bird watching, park land, boating facility at Moon Bay.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that launching boats is difficult and expensive and no one is guaranteed a spot. Suggests that if something opened up around Moon Bay that the community would be very happy.

The facilitator asked participants to review page 20 of the discussion guide regarding local capacity.

C: Meeting Participant: Expresses concerns between international and local unions. Asks LNG Canada to deal with local unions in order to hire local.

C: Meeting Participant: Discusses the problems with unions and says the local hire of many non-union subcontractors is a contentious issue. Suggests LNG Canada can learn from RTA’s missteps but recognizes good intentions on their part.

C: Meeting Participant: Spent 27 years in an international union and was involved in the Northern Alberta Aboriginal Business Association (NAABA) that Shell was a part of in the Fort McMurray region. Says it was a great way of getting feedback from local contractors regarding changes, opportunities and pre-qualifications. Says it worked well for contractors. Questions who is checking with RTA to ensure they are following through on their promises.

C: Meeting Participant: Runs an employment agency through Kitimat Valley Institute and has 80 people working on site at RTA. Says there is conflict between locals and those being brought in to work because locals do not get special recognition and benefits (e.g. time off and flights home) that nonlocal workers get. Says there is a lot of dissention between those coming from outside the region. Suggests having some sort of job share, where one person works one week and the other works the next could be a solution.

10

C: Meeting Participant: Stresses the importance for companies to identify skills required so that Northwest Community College can know what is needed in order to build local capacity to meet those jobs that are available.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the jobs are for operations or for construction exclusively.

A: Meeting Participant: Notes that NWCC can incorporate other colleges to ensure a broad spectrum of workers is available.

C: Joan Goldhawk: Thanks everyone for suggestions and encourages people to let her know if they have any more.

3. CLOSING REMARKS

The facilitator asks participants to fill out the feedback forms.

Jane Newlands provides an overview of next steps in the project planning process and thanks everyone for coming.

The meeting was closed at 2:40 pm.

1

MEETING DETAILS

LNG Canada Project – Community Consultation, June 2014 Small Group Meeting #2 June 25, 2014, 6:00 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. LNG Canada Community Information Centre, Kitimat, BC

PURPOSE Notes from a Small Group Meeting for the LNG Canada Project Community Consultation held on June 25, 2014 at the LNG Canada Community Information Centre, Kitimat, BC.

FACILITATOR Jennifer Davies, Consultant

MEETING RECORDER Katie Baker, Consultant

PRESENTER

Jane Newlands, Manager, Community Consultation, LNG Canada Seiichi Tsurumi, Manager, Stakeholder Engagement, JV for LNG Canada Russell Morrison, Lead, Environmental Assessment for LNG Canada

ATTENDEES (12) Local Community, Stakeholders and Government

PROJECT TEAM ATTENDEES

Martin Barnes, Operations Lead, LNG Canada Joan Goldhawk, Local Content, LNG Canada Russell Morrison, Senior Environmental Planner, LNG Canada Mary-Ellen Proctor, Community Liaison Officer, LNG Canada Wim Ravesloot, Project Director, LNG Canada Elliot Smith, Camp and Accommodations, LNG Canada Seiichi Tsurumi, LNG Canada Ruth Sulentich, Senior Public Consultation Advisor, LNG Canada Susan Bruckner, Consultant

AGENDA

1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Consultation and Project Overview 3. Project Design and Site Layout – Q & A 4. Environmental Assessment Overview 5. Consultation Topics and Group Discussion – Q & A 6. Feedback Form 7. Wrap-Up and Next Steps

2

1. KEY THEMES

• Committee and legacy fund for fish/wildlife/habitat • Innovation/ideas for better/more/affordable/options for waterfront access • Training/employment innovations that better captures/balances local capacity/education

and certification/experience. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 pm. The following abbreviations will be used in the meeting record – Q: Question, A: Answer, C: Comment

2. WELCOME AND REVIEW OF AGENDA

Jennifer Davies introduces herself as facilitator and thanks participants for attending. She passes around a sign-in sheet and asks participants to write their names on the tent cards provided. She then reviews the agenda. Round table introductions follow. Jane Newlands introduces herself and talks about the importance of community involvement in project planning. Jane introduces Seiichi Tsurumi, Joan Goldhawk, Russell Morrison, Ruth Sulentich, Martin Barnes, Mary-Ellen Proctor, Elliot Smith and Susan Bruckner. Jane reviews the purpose of the meeting; to hear what participants have to say, and to give updated Project information. She mentions site model downstairs and points out display boards around the room.

3. PRESENTATION – Project Overview and Project Design

Jane Newlands reviews slides and explains the Joint Venture behind LNG Canada, provides a Project Update: Where We’ve Come From/Where We Are Going, the Upstream Gas Supply and the National Energy Board license. Highlights milestones: Joint Venture Agreement, and the CSFW contract announcement held in Kitimat in May. Seiichi Tsurumi reviews slides illustrating the Project Design, siting rationale and reviews the LNG Facility/Marine Terminal Siting – Key Considerations slide. Discusses the safety, land and gas supply considerations. Explains that the pipeline from Groundbirch to Kitimat through the mountains is one of the shortest pipelines being proposed. Discusses growing Canadian gas supply and the change in market from the American market to overseas and Asia. Explains proposed facility layout. Russell Morrison provides a status update on the Environmental Assessment process, and the Scope of LNG Canada’s Application (the Application) for an Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC). Mary-Ellen Proctor gives a safety briefing. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks how many trains are being built to support the gas line. A: Seiichi Tsurumi: Responds that the project will be built based on a four-train capacity. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the site is bigger than Rio Tinto Alcan’s (RTA) site. A: Russell Morrison: Responds that LNG Canada (LNG CANADA) is most likely smaller in area size.

3

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about royalties for gas. A: Seiichi Tsurumi: Responds that if the tax is too high, the investment would not be

economical. C: Jane Newlands: Adds that the Final Investment Decision (FID) would be affected by

factors such as regulatory approvals, certainty around economic framework and feasibility.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if LNG Canada is presently clearing land for the pipeline and if it is a separate corridor from Chevron.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that Chevron is building their facility and the pipeline, whereas LNG CANADA has contracted Coastal GasLink to build the pipeline supplying the LNG CANADA Project, and it is currently undergoing a separate Environmental Assessment.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the pipeline areas are separate cleared areas. A: Jane Newlands: Responds that Coastal GasLink representatives can answer questions

regarding the pipeline. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if there will be a mid-ocean exchange of ballast water or a

filtration system on the vessels. A: Russell Morrison: Responds that LNG Canada will comply with MARPOL requirements

which will require ballast water exchange a certain distance offshore. C: Seiichi Tsurumi: Adds that international ships would have to exchange ballast water 200

miles away from location from Canada. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if some of the freighters are single, dual or what kind of crop

vessels. Expresses concern regarding winds pushing or pulling the vessels. A: Seiichi Tsurumi: Responds that most LNG Carriers are single propeller and single rudder

design, and that LNG Canada has undertaken simulations with the BC Pilots Association to test high wind situations. The tugs should be able to control the vessels in this case.

Q: Meeting Participant: Says that in the case of an earthquake, silt turns to water. Asks what facilities LNG Canada will provide to protect the community from an earthquake.

A: Seiichi Tsurumi: Responds that the existing LNG storage tanks in other facilities such as Japan, are built on concrete stilts, are pile driven, and have not been effected by earthquakes to date.

C: Jane Newlands: Adds that the LNG Canada Application for an EAC has a chapter called Effects of the Environment on the Project, which details how the project will be built and operated to handle these situations.

C: Martin Barnes: Adds that LNG Canada has added concrete reinforcement in the design to handle seismic activity.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the community will be supplied with natural gas and says it is currently only available at a very high price.

C: Meeting Participant: Suggests having a competitive option for transportation costs. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the quantity of ships coming in and going out per year. A: Seiichi Tsurumi: Responds that the facility will have roughly one ship coming and one

ship going per day at full build out. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if First Nations have been invited to participate in the

consultation. A: Jane Newlands: Says that LNG Canada meets with First Nations separately and that

First Nations are invited to participate in community events. LNG Canada meets with

4

different community groups regularly and provides multiple avenues for people to participate as they feel comfortable.

C: Meeting Participant: Comments on a process called MAPP and says that First Nations people are attempting to take over the coast.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the federal government has given any indication they will improve their radio coverage and communications at sea.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that LNG Canada will be looking at marine navigation as part of the Application.

The facilitator asks participants to read pages 6-7 of the Discussion Guide. Jane reviews concerns heard in regards to impacts to local way of life during construction, safety of the local community during operations, concerns about housing affordability and availability. C: Meeting Participant: Discusses the workers from RTA, how they work ten hours per day,

and are there to make money. Says he does not notice them much. C: Meeting Participant: Says that town is busier, traffic is more intense, and that property

taxes have doubled due to industry. Adds that he sees increased criminal activity but not necessarily from camp.

C: Meeting Participant: Says there is a bottleneck at the bridge causing bumper to bumper traffic and that another crossing will be needed.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks how many construction workers will be needed. A: Jane Newlands: Explains the need for approximately 5500, and that the camp would be

built for 4500 people but could be expanded to accommodate 7500 people. Asks whether the group has any advice for LNG Canada regarding the camp

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about Project timing and if the RTA project would be finished before this project was underway.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that if all aligns (e.g. LNG Canada receives regulatory approvals next year, takes FID, etc.), construction could begin the following year. Notes that LNG Canada understands that RTA will be finished sometime next year.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if LNG Canada will use the RTA trailers for the camp. A: Elliot Smith: Responds that LNG Canada is running a longer-term program than RTA,

and that RTA’s camp is a more temporary setup. Explains that LNG Canada wants to achieve high worker retention and continuity by ensuring they are well-rested, well-fed and have access to recreational facilities. Adds that the LNG Canada camp will be designed to be one of the best camps in Canada, which is in the interest of both the community and the Project.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks where the camp will it be situated. A: Elliot Smith: Responds that the camp will be located in the industrial portion of the city but

that LNG CANADA has not yet determined the exact location. Adds that LNG Canada is looking to have the camp located on the industrial side of the bridge to limit the amount of crossings every day.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks what will be left for the community after the Project has completed the construction phase.

A: Jane Newlands: Responds that LNG Canada is looking at legacies such as the need for affordable housing. Asks for suggestions regarding camp design and ideas for legacy projects.

5

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks how many acres are needed to construct the camp. A: Elliot Smith: Explains that 65 – 100 acres will be needed depending on the design. Notes

that within a reasonable amount of time, LNG Canada should be able to provide more information.

C: Jane Newlands: Explains the preference is to have the camp right next to the facility so that workers can walk to and from the work site, but notes that as we are still early in the front end engineering and design phase, we have also identified several alternatives. When selecting our site, we are making an effort to avoid Haisla Boulevard to minimize day-to-day traffic.

Wim Ravesloot joins the meeting and the facilitator asks participants to review pages 8-9 of Discussion Guide. C: Meeting Participant: Says he wants more discussion regarding land-use involved in the

discussion. The facilitator asks for ideas, advice, and input with respect to the marine environment. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about vessel speeds in the Douglas Channel. C: Meeting Participant: Explains how ships are not allowed to speed down the channel. A: Seiichi Tsurumi: Explains that LNG Canada has undertaken a wake study, and have

found that LNG carriers give off a very low amount of wake. Acknowledges that this information needs to be proven and says that LNG Canada is doing simulation and will be providing that as part of our EA.

Q: Meeting Participant: Says there are times of the year when the entire channel is blocked by those out fishing. Asks about marine use planning with respect to multiple ships coming and going. Also expresses concerns regarding vessel impacts to fishing and nets.

A: Jane Newlands: Suggest that the discussion is focused on seeking group input regarding mitigations proposed regarding communications.

C: Meeting Participant: Expresses the need to expand the marina immediately. Concerns regarding higher usage, parking shortages, and difficulties with launching boats all before the Project has started. Says that Sundays are too busy for fishing due to workers having Sundays off.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that a public boat launch is needed, as the cost and trouble of launching a boat in the marina is unreasonable.

C: Meeting Participant: Explains there are 35 parking spots in the marina and that parking spots have been lost to tractor trailers. Expresses concerns regarding boat launch, parking restraints, cost.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the cumulative effects of vessels from various projects. A: Jane Newlands: Explains that cumulative effects will be addressed as part of the

Application, and the TERMPOL process will be looking at marine navigation and regulations.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the TERMPOL process. A: Russell Morrison: Transport Canada has recently designated a technical review

committee for the west coast so they recognize the increasing shipping traffic.

6

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if the outside channel will be radio controlled. A: Russell Morrison: Confirms the use of the existing Coast Guard MCTS system (radio)

and AIS system and that Transport Canada has identified a number of upgrades needed for the AIS system to extend the range.

The facilitator asks everyone to turn to page 13 of the discussion guide. Jane Newlands discusses impacts to the estuary, efforts to minimize those impacts, and suggestions for possible mitigations. C: Meeting Participant: Explains that the estuary is very important to Kitimat and that he

hunts ducks there. Says access has been lost to the estuary since RTA took over the dock, and that residents want access to hunt ducks and geese.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that Corridor Road is no longer available as it is grown over and is privately owned. Asks for further discussion on this. Says he has seen projects and companies come and go leaving impacts and cumulative effects while leaving no legacy fund. Says he would like to have water access points and a legacy fund, and says that fish and wildlife are important aspects of why residents choose to live in Kitimat. Would like to be involved going forward in discussions and suggest forming a working group or advisory committee on the matter.

Q: Meeting Participant: Says that residents are currently living with very poor air quality and that RTA increased the levels of sulphur dioxide. Asks for details on air emissions from a four-train facility.

A: Meeting Participant: Responds there is very little sulphur dioxide being released, but will be a lot of carbon dioxide.

C: Wim Ravesloot: Says there will be sulphur dioxide being emitted, but much less than a coal burning facility and that there is nothing cleaner than an LNG plant. Explains that the provincial government is revising the regulations on nitrogen oxide emissions, and it may be as low as they can get it. Says that LNG Canada will both comply with and be better than regulations.

C: Jane Newlands: Explains that the Application will include a number of sections to address air quality including local air quality and that an additional acidification study undertaken due to feedback from community consultation last year.

C: Meeting Participant: Expresses concern about air pollution and the visible pollution that can be seen when driving down into the valley.

C: Meeting Participant: Adds that the air has limits for pollution. Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the size of safety areas around the buildings in the site

layout and classification. A: Martin Barnes: Explains that once the siting study is complete, LNG Canada will do an

area classification and decide via regulations what classifies as Class 1 versus Class 2. The footprint will be inside the fence.

C: Meeting Participant: Comments that there is a deficiency in skilled trades and says a project legacy could be created through building local capacity.

The facilitator refers to page 20 of the discussion guide regarding local capacity and mentions Joan Goldhawk, responsible for local content.

7

C: Meeting Participant: Says that their training system works through apprenticeships and asks how apprenticeships could be arranged before the Project is up and running.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that from a college training perspective, Northwest Community College is preparing to provide training and trade unions are in the area trying to set up their schools even though NWCC is the accredited institution for this catchment. Those schools would have to partner to ensure students are getting full accreditation. Says that NWCC is facing this with institutions such as BCIT who claim to do all LNG training within the province. Says he wants to know what the Project needs are so they can provide specific training to meet those needs.

C: Meeting Participant: Says he heard from Project members that they are short thousands of welders. Asks how to manage that shortage when there is more than one project going on at the same time.

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks about the approximate numbers of all tradespeople needed for construction.

A: Jane Newlands: Explains that LNG Canada is still doing an analysis of projected need for construction of the facility.

C: Wim Ravesloot: Says that LNG Canada hopes to build the facility with 4500 people and allow for 7500 people because the skill and productivity level of workers cannot be determined as of yet. Explains that we have a project amount for all trades, but that it is still early in the assessment. Acknowledges it will require significant effort to get worker competency up to scale, but that Joan Goldhawk is working on programs to help develop skills and best prepare people so they are ready to do the job required.

Q: Meeting Participant: Explains that she works with locals trying to find employment. Says she encourages young people to enter into the trades. Says the biggest problem is that people do not have the exact requirements and cannot find work. Says there are two kinds of people: those with 30 years of experience but no official training or certification and with low levels of education making it impossible to challenge an exam, and those with education and certification who cannot find work because they lack experience. Says that because of this, she is constantly fighting with companies in order to get people out there to work or gain experience. Says that companies should take a stand on this issue and should be accountable for giving willing applicants the experience.

Q: Joan Goldhawk: Asks for clarification regarding businesses giving training to local residents.

A: Meeting Participant: Says that companies would pay for everything, provide people with training, and then have no work available for them.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that when he worked for Eurocan he was involved with the union. Explains they changed their hiring practices from hiring people who seemed like they would suit a certain position, to hiring only those with university educations who did not want to do the work and did not care about the work. Suggests lowering expectations around education and qualifications of applicants (gave a janitorial position as an example).

Q: Meeting Participant: Asks if LNG Canada will be bringing in Temporary Foreign Workers. A: Jane Newlands: Says there is still a lot of work to be done in finding out how best to

source the workforce. Explains the Front-end Engineering and Design (FEED) contractor will be doing most of the hiring, but that the leadership teams of both LNG Canada and the FEED contractor have signed a commitment to hire local first.

8

C: Joan Goldhawk: Explains that LNG Canada is developing a workforce development strategy that looks at the different aspects of employment such as how to train and employ locally. Explains that although jobs are not available at the present time, LNG Canada is working on how to leverage partnerships as industry in order to provide opportunities for the local community. Suggests having a meeting to discuss how best to take this on. Adds that after looking to hire locally, LNG Canada will look provincially and then nationally.

The facilitator asks participants to review page 21 of the discussion guide. C: Meeting Participant: Suggests the need to educate camp workers on the rules of the road

(e.g. what is acceptable locally). Expresses concerns about workers breaking fishing regulations.

C: Elliot Smith: Explains that the long-term workforce facility will have training rooms to be used for continuing education and health and safety training. Thanks Al for the idea of training workers on hunting and fishing rules and thinks that people will be eager to learn about the area.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that in the past, fisheries officers have gone into camps to explain the rules and that workers did not care about the rules or the resulting fines. Suggests LNG Canada implement repercussions and enforce all rules within the employment agreement. Says that the same applies for things such as impaired driving and that LNG Canada needs to take rule enforcement on seriously.

C: Meeting Participant: Adds that residents have lost access to the ocean and stresses the importance of it. Says that as each company moved out of town, access was lost and it would mean a lot to the community if LNG Canada could restore some of this ground.

C: Meeting Participant: Asks that LNG Canada reach out to recreational clubs and associations to arrange for overflow from workers on their days off.

C: Meeting Participant: Agrees with the employment agreement for workers and thinks it sends the right messages in terms of following the rules.

C: Meeting Participant: Suggests a zero tolerance policy because imposing fines often has little effect on the workers.

C: Meeting Participant: Says that abuse on the system affects the local users.

4. CLOSING REMARKS

The facilitator asks people to fill out the feedback from at the back of the discussion guide. Jane Newlands thanks all participants for attending and reminds them to check out the 3-D site model and the interactive display located in the arena. Provides LNG Canada contact information and concludes the meeting at 8:15 p.m.


APPENDICES

APPENDIX B Discussion Guide and Feedback Form

LNG Canada Community ConsultationJUNE/JULY 2014 – DISCUSSION GUIDE & FEEDBACK FORM

LNG Canada Community Consultation June/July 2014 – Discussion GuideJune/July 2014 – Discussion Guide 1

Since we were last out in the community, we have been working to develop updated project information, including the design of the facility, ways we can work together to address your concerns, and identify additional areas for community input.

As we continue to prepare our application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate for later this year, we hope you will get involved to learn more and help us further develop our plans.

LNG Canada Community Consultation in Kitimat – June 24 to July 15, 2014

Open House & BBQ

Tuesday June 24, 4:00pm – 8:00pm LNG Canada Information Centre

Small Group Meetings*

Wednesday, June 25 12 noon – 2:30pm & 6:00pm – 8:30pm

Please email [email protected] to RSVP for a small group meeting

3-D Site Model

Beginning June 24, stop by the LNG Canada Information Centre during opening hours to view our new 3-D site model

Website

Consultation materials can be accessed at lngcanada.ca

* Small group meetings will cover the same information and are designed to provide opportunities for dialogue and Q & A.

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION – JUNE /JULY 2014

LNG Canada is committed to ensuring that the local community has opportunities to learn more about the proposed project and provide input on things that matter to you.

Your Input Is Important

This Discussion Guide provides updated information on a number of topics we have developed since our last consultation. These topics would benefit from community input for the purposes of advancing project planning and the environmental assessment.

Understanding and Minimizing Community Impacts

Project Design and Marine Shipping Plans

Environmental Assessment

Local Benefits

Commuity Engagement Methods

As you are reading the Discussion Guide, please look for the ? icon which indicates the areas where we are seeking your input. You can provide your input by completing the feedback form included at the back of this Discussion Guide.

Please complete the feedback form and return it to LNG Canada by July 15, 2014.

OUTLINE

COMMUNITY CONSULTATION OVERVIEW 1

ABOUT LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS AND LNG CANADA

About Liquefied Natural Gas 2 About LNG Canada and the Proposed Project 4

UNDERSTANDING AND MINIMIZING COMMUNITY IMPACTS

What We’ve Heard and What We Are Doing 6-9

THE PROPOSED LNG CANADA PROJECT AND WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE

The Project Site 10 Key Features 12 What We’re Still Working On 13 Shipping LNG 14

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Environmental Assessment Scope 16 Next Steps in the Environmental Assessment Process 17

WORKING TOGETHER TO DELIVER LOCAL BENEFITS

Overview 18 LNG Canada in the Community 19 Building Local Capacity 20 Water Access and Recreational Opportunities 21

ONGOING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

LNG Canada Community Contract 22

NEXT STEPS 24

FEEDBACK FORM Attached to Back of the Guide

LNG Canada Community Consultation

mailto:info%40lngcanada.ca?subject=

www.lngcanada.ca

June/July 2014 – Discussion Guide 3

Did You Know?

• LNG is simply natural gas – what many of us use in our homes to cook food or heat water – but in a liquid form.

• A molecule of natural gas will take 12.5 days to travel from northeast British Columbia to the LNG customer in Asia.

• The volume of natural gas shrinks about 600 times when liquefied – think of something going from the size of a large beach ball to the size of a baseball.

• LNG itself does not burn because it does not contain oxygen, which is needed to create a flame.

1. Gas Field

5. LNG Tanker

2. Pipeline 3. Liquefaction Plant

7. Vapourizers

4. LNG Storage Tank

6. LNG Storage Tank 8. Pipeline System

LNG Process

LNG Canada recently hosted a series of live demonstrations, bringing LNG to the communities of Kitimat, Kitimaat Village and Terrace for the first time. Please visit our website, lngcanada.ca, to view a video that explains the science behind LNG.

ABOUT LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS


Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is natural gas in its liquid, rather than gaseous form. Natural gas is odourless, colourless, non-toxic and non-corrosive. It is abundant, naturally occurring, safe and reliable and has been distributed to customers via pipelines in British Columbia for more than 50 years.

To export natural gas overseas by marine vessel, natural gas is cooled to -162 degrees Celsius, the temperature at which gas turns into a liquid and reduces in volume by 600 times.

In its liquid form, natural gas can be efficiently shipped by ocean-going LNG carriers to global markets. When the cargo arrives in port, the LNG is warmed, which

returns it to its gaseous state, and distributed via pipeline to its final destination.

Liquefied Natural Gas is stored at atmospheric pressure without any air, which means it cannot explode. If LNG is inadvertently released,

it will quickly vapourize as it warms, and dissipate into the atmosphere, leaving no residue.

June/July 2014 – Discussion Guide

www.lngcanada.ca


Securing Access to Natural Gas Supply

In June 2012, Shell selected TransCanada Pipelines, the company that will build and

operate the proposed Coastal GasLink project that will transport natural gas from the Western Sedimentary Basin.

Undertaking Community and First Nations Consultation

Since early 2012, LNG Canada has been actively engaging with First Nations,

stakeholders and local residents to share project information and seek input for consideration in project planning, including the Environmental Assessment.

Acquiring a National Energy Board Export Licence

LNG Canada received approval from the National Energy Board (NEB) in

February 2013 for a licence authorizing the export of approximately 24 million tonnes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) per year, for a term of 25 years.

Initiating of Environmental Assessment (EA) Process

LNG Canada’s EA process was formally initiated in May 2013 with confirmation

from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEAA) that the Government of Canada would grant substitution of the EA to British Columbia. This means that British Columbia is managing the EA process.

Since early 2012, LNG Canada has initiated and undertaken many activities to support the development of the proposed project, including:

Conducting Environmental and Engineering Studies

LNG Canada has conducted engineering and

geotechnical studies at the proposed site location, as well as environmental studies. These studies are part of a regulated environmental assessment process to understand the potential impacts of the project on the community and the environment, and ways to avoid and/or minimize these impacts.

Signing of Joint Venture Agreement

In April 2014, the project partners formalized the joint venture agreement, marking

an important milestone for the project in the creation of an operating entity that will enable LNG Canada to move the project forward and enter into agreements with potential suppliers and contractors.

Selecting a Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) and Project Execution Services Contractor

In May 2014, LNG Canada selected CFSW LNG Constructors, a partnership of Chiyoda, Foster Wheeler, SAIPEM and WorleyParsons, as the Main Contractor. CFSW LNG Constructors will be responsible for the majority of the employment and contracting opportunities during the Front End Engineering and Design (FEED) and construction phase.

LNG Canada Community Consultation 4

ABOUT LNG CANADA AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Building a world-class facility in northern British Columbia – Shell, PetroChina, KOGAS and Mitsubishi Corporation are working together to design, build and operate the proposed LNG Canada project, located in Kitimat, British Columbia.

British Columbia is a natural choice for LNG Canada’s proposed project because of its abundant gas reserves – more natural gas than the province or the country needs for domestic use. LNG Canada reviewed more than 500 sites in British Columbia – from the Lower Mainland to the northwest corner of the province – prior to selecting the

Proposed Project Timeline Building an LNG export terminal takes many years of planning, studies and engaging with stakeholders, First Nations and local communities. We believe in taking our time to ensure we get it right.

Subject to environmental approvals, LNG Canada expects to make a final investment decision in a couple of years. Construction would take an additional four to five years.

site near Kitimat at the northern end of Douglas Channel. While there are a number of LNG projects proposed in British Columbia, including the northwest coast, LNG Canada is unique because of the extensive experience our four joint venture partners have in the LNG industry – in the safe production, shipping and distribution of LNG.

2011 2012

2013 2014 2015

Initial Engagement

Technical andEnvironmental Studies

National Energy BoardExport Licence Approval

Environmental AssessmentIncluding Consultation

First Nations andCommunity Engagement Ongoing



LNG Canada Community Consultation June/July 2014 – Discussion Guide 7

Safety of the local community during operations

• The LNG Canada project will meet the strictest regulatory and operational standards for safety.

• Numerous safeguard systems will be installed to protect against incidents such as shutdown systems, safety and security zones, and spill containment systems.

• Safety and emergency response procedures are highly regulated under the BC Oil and Gas Commission, and will be subject to regulatory approval through the environmental assessment process.

• We will develop an integrated emergency response program in collaboration with local emergency experts.

• Safety training for all LNG Canada employees and contractors will be mandatory.

Concerns about housing affordability and availability

• LNG Canada will undertake the following activities to help with concerns about housing affordability and availability:

- Build an easily expandable camp.

- Work with developers to create new housing for LNG staff located in the community.

- Work with the Provincial Government, the District of Kitimat and other project proponents to develop a Kitimat Housing Action Plan.

Please see question 1 of the feedback form

?Impacts to local way of life during construction

• LNG Canada’s construction camp (the LNG Canada Village) will be located in Kitimat’s industrial zone, well outside the centre of town and will have the following features to help minimize the impact on local residents:

- A full-service, self-contained camp including sewer, water and solid waste infrastructure.

- Bus transportation for workers to reduce the use of personal automobiles and maximize road safety. Shuttle service will take workers to the site and to and from town. We will also develop a Traffic Management Plan in collaboration with the District of Kitimat and other stakeholders.

- Off-site parking to be located near the Terrace-Kitimat airport and a location in Kitimat to be determined in consultation with the community.

- On-site medical clinic to reduce the impact on local medical personnel.

- On-site amenities like recreation facilities, food and beverage.

WHAT WE’VE HEARD AND WHAT WE’RE DOING

Over the past few years, LNG Canada has spent time with local residents and stakeholders to better understand concerns related to the proposed project, and what we can do to address these concerns. What we heard, more clearly than anything else, is how important it is to ensure that the safety and quality of life of Kitimat residents and users of the coastal waters is not compromised over the life of the project. Specifically, we are working on addressing the following concerns:

6


Concerns We’ve Heard

What We are Doing



Protect the marine environment• LNG Canada included the inland

shipping route in its EA scope – from the docks in Kitimat to Triple Island – the first LNG proponent to do so.

• Based on early consultations with First Nations and the local community, LNG Canada has completed a state of the art marine mammal baseline study program to better understand the wide range of marine mammals that live or transit through north coast waters. The data collected is being used to inform our environmental assessment.

• As part of the EA, we are developing potential mitigation measures including reduced vessel speeds of 8 to 14 knots when in sensitive coastal waterways to further safeguard the marine environment.

Minimize impacts on marine users including recreational and commercial

• LNG Canada has been consulting with the local community to understand how recreational and commercial users could be affected as a result of the project.

• We will continue to seek input that will help us develop measures to mitigate the potential effects of the project, including developing communications plans to ensure the marine users are aware of shipping schedules.


?

Minimize impacts of increased ships in north coast waters• All ships are designed to meet rigorous international standards. Ships will be re-inspected on a regular

basis, with a full dry dock inspection every five years.

• While in inland waters, ships will have a transit tug escort and two certified B.C. Marine Pilots will board the vessel to provide local area guidance to the ship’s master to ensure its safe passage to the terminal. These Marine Pilots have extensive knowledge of the local waterways.

• Undertaking a Transport Canada TERMPOL review process (Technical Review Process of Marine Terminal Systems and Transshipment Sites) – a voluntary technical review designed and led by Transport Canada to identify navigational and any other recommendations to support a safe shipping environment.

• LNG Canada will consult with local stakeholders as part of the development of emergency response plans to ensure that local expertise is being considered in all that we do.

8

WHAT WE’VE HEARD AND WHAT WE’RE DOING

Concerns We’ve Heard

What We are Doing



A Natural Gas Receiving and LNG Production FacilityNatural gas from northeast BC will arrive at the LNG Canada facility via Coastal Gas Link pipeline, entering the plant at the northeast of the site. Turn the page for more information about the key features of the site.

Visit our Information Centre in Kitimat to see our new 3-D site model

11

1. Rail Yard

5. Flare Stacks

2. LNG Processing Units

4. Water Treatment Facility

This is an artist’s rendering illustrating the project at full build-out and may not be to scale. Colours and specific features are subject to change based on our ongoing evaluations.


?

8 LNG Canada Community Consultation

THE PROJECT SITE LNG Canada is proposing to construct and operate a gas liquefaction facility for the storage and export of liquefied natural gas (LNG), including marine facilities, in Kitimat, British Columbia. The proposed LNG Canada facility will be located on approximately 350 to 400 hectares of land in Kitimat's industrial area. Key features of the proposed project site, which make it ideal for an LNG export facility, include:

Industrial-Zoned Land

Existing Infrastructure Including Roads,

Power Lines and the Terrace Airport

Year-Round Ice-free

Deep Water Port

Positive Relationships with Local Government,

Community and First Nations

10

3. LNG Storage Tanks

6. LNG Loading Line

7. Marine Wharf/Tug Boat Dock



The following key areas are still under development and we look forward to sharing additional information about these plans as they develop over the coming months:

Natural gas, before it is liquefied, will be used to drive the powerful gas turbines needed to turn the compressors in the processing units. We are currently working on developing plans to acquire the remaining power needs for the LNG Canada Project. The power supply decision is an important consideration that will factor into our environmental assessment studies, including air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions.

Power Supply

LNG Canada is committed to minimizing impacts to the Kitimat River Estuary and is currently exploring a variety of options to avoid or mitigate them. For example, we have designed the site footprint to permit Anderson and Moore Creek to flow unobstructed to the estuary. In other areas, sections of the main stem of Beaver Creek and the Kitimat River side channel will be realigned around the footprint to mitigate impacts on freshwater fish habitat. However, we recognize that there is no way to entirely avoid some of the impacts and as such, we are working on developing habitat compensation plans to offset the impacts of LNG Canada’s project on fish and wildlife in the Kitimat River Estuary. We are also exploring the potential for the establishment of an environmental fund to enhance environmental improvement and conservation in the area. We understand the estuary is of great importance to the community and we will be seeking your input once these plans are further developed.

Addressing Potential Impacts to the Kitimat River Estuary

While the exact location is yet to be determined, LNG Canada’s proposed worker camp will be located in the industrial zoned area of Kitimat. The camp design will take into consideration a number of key concerns raised by the community, which are summarized on pages 6 & 7 of this Discussion Guide.

Camp Design and Location

WHAT WE’RE STILL WORKING ON If the LNG Canada project is approved for construction, the following key features would be built at the site:

Natural gas will enter into one of the processing units or “trains” – a series of pressure vessels, heat exchangers, compressors and pumps – where it will be cleaned of CO2, water, heavier hydrocarbons that liquefy at higher temperatures, and any impurities that can freeze and block the flow of gases. The gas is then chilled to -162 degrees Celsius and turned into LNG. The project will be constructed in phases, starting with the construction of two LNG production trains. Up to four trains could be built based on market demand.

Up to Four LNG Processing Units2

One of the more noticeable pieces of infrastructure on the site will be the two Flare Stacks – one will be 125 metres in height and the second will be 60 metres. A flare stack acts as a safety device, common to all LNG facilities. When the plant is operating normally, residents can expect to see, at most, a relatively small, clean burning flame at the top of the stacks, which have been sited as far as possible from residential homes and built tall to secure a safe distance between workers and equipment. LNG Canada is assessing the potential visual and acoustic effects as part of the EA and will develop mitigation plans as required.

Flare Stacks5

LNG is piped to two large LNG storage tanks where it stays until it is loaded onto LNG carriers at the wharf. The two membrane tanks – a concrete tank with a layer of insulation connected to the concrete, protected by a metal membrane, which separates the LNG from the insulation will be 90 metres in diameter and 45 metres tall.

LNG Storage Tanks3

A Water Treatment Facility will use water from the Kitimat River to supply water to the plant to be used for cooling. Sand and silt needs to be removed from the water prior to use. Return water will be treated prior to releasing it back into the environment. Firewater will also be stored in dedicated firewater storage facilities on the site.

Water Treatment Facility 4The LNG Canada wharf will be an existing wharf that will be redesigned to accommodate two LNG carriers. Every LNG vessel at the wharf will have a safety zone around it of approximately 200 metres. The site will also include a tugboat dock, the exact location of which has yet to be determined. Every LNG carrier will be assisted at the wharf by three tugboats. The LNG carrier will still be under power in case emergency response is required, however, tugs will manoeuver along side, travelling at very low speeds until the LNG carrier is secured at the berth.

A Marine Wharf/Tugboat Dock7

The Rail Yard that already exists on the site will remain in place and be used to remove light condensate, one of the natural by-products of turning natural gas into a liquid. LNG Canada will move the condensate by rail car off the site.

Rail Yard 1

LNG will be transported from the storage tanks to the LNG carrier via two LNG Loading Lines. They are insulated to keep the LNG in its liquid form. When there is no LNG carrier to load, the loading lines are kept cold by circulating LNG within them. The loading lines will be designed in consideration of the surrounding environment and will provide safe passage under the loading lines for fish and wildlife.

LNG Loading Lines That Connect The Storage Tanks To The Wharf6

KEY FEATURES

8 LNG Canada Community Consultation 12


LNG Canada Community Consultation June/July 2014 – Discussion Guide

Lax Kw'alaams

Metlakatla Village

KitamaatVillage

Kitselas

Kitsumkalum

ProposedProject Site

HaidaGwaii

Lax Kw'alaams

Metlakatla Village

KitamaatVillage

Kitselas

Kitsumkalum

ProposedProject Site

HaidaGwaii

15

Proposed LNG Canada Project Site

Pilot Boarding Station

*Map is for illustrative purposes only

Proposed Shipping Route

SHIPPING LNG LNG has the best shipping record of any industry, with more than 50 years without any significant incidents. There are currently 400 LNG carriers in operation around the world and over 70,000 LNG ship cargoes have been shipped since 1964 without a single loss.

As part of project planning and the environmental assessment, we are developing plans to address a number of key concerns raised by the community, which are summarized on pages 8 & 9 of this Discussion Guide. As these plans are developed, we would like to hear from you about what considerations are important to you to ensure the continued and safe use of Douglas Channel.

Depending on the size of the LNG carriers, between 170 and 350 vessels are expected to visit the LNG Canada terminal annually – or at full build out, about one ship arriving per day.

8 LNG Canada Community Consultation 14

Example of one of our preliminary visual assessments of an LNG Carrier in Douglas Channel



LNG Canada Community Consultation June/July 2014 – Discussion Guide

NEXT STEPS IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS

With the Application Information Requirements (AIR) approved, and with input from the public and First Nations, the LNG Canada project team is now assessing the potential impacts of the proposed project and developing measures to reduce, eliminate or address them.

LNG Canada expects that the environmental assessment application will be complete sometime in the fall of 2014, at which time there will be many opportunities for the public, First Nations and stakeholders to review and provide comment on the potential environmental effects and our proposed mitigation measures.

17

Please see question 3 - 4 of the feedback form

?

16

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCOPE

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

We summarized this information in a document called Application Information Requirements, or AIR for short, which basically outlines the studies, methods and information that will be required in LNG Canada’s Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate. The B.C. Environmental Assessment Office shared this document with government agencies, First Nations and the public for review and comment. LNG Canada has responded to all comments and our responses have been posted on the BC Environmental Assessment Office’s website.

For more information about LNG Canada’s EA process, please visit www.eao.gov.bc.ca and look for our project under ‘Proposed EAs’.

Scope of the Environmental Assessment (EA) Process

The following major project components are scoped into the EA for LNG Canada:

Generally, LNG Canada's EA will focus on project construction, operations, and supplyactivities and assess the following key areas:

Environmental: (air quality, noise, water, vegetation, wildlife, fish, marine mammals, etc.)

Heritage effects: (archeological and heritage)

Social effects: (infrastructure and services, visual, marine transportation and use)

Health effects: (human health, community health and well being)

Economic effects

Shipping / marine traffic

First Nations interests

Accidents / malfunctions

Cumulative effects

The LNG facility

Shipping

The marine terminal

Supporting infrastructure and facilities

As part of the regulatory process, LNG Canada identified a number of environmental and social studies needed to assess the potential effects of our project – from studies that examine shipping and marine traffic, to social effects, heritage effects and First Nations interests.

www.eao.gov.bc.ca

LNG Canada Community Consultation 21June/July 2014 – Discussion Guide18

LNG CANADA IN THE COMMUNITYLNG Canada actively supports a wide range of programs and community initiatives throughout Kitimat and the surrounding areas. Our social investment program is focused on safety, community development, education and environment. As the proposed LNG Canada project progresses and our presence grows, you can expect to see more from LNG Canada by way of community contributions. It is our intention to provide projects that will contribute to the well-being of the community in meaningful and lasting ways.


?

OVERVIEW

LNG Canada is committed to ensuring that benefits from the project accrue to the communities in which we operate. If built, the LNG Canada facility will be one of the most significant contributors to the local and regional economies. While the LNG Canada project offers a variety of opportunities for direct employment, there are numerous other benefits as well.

Permanent Jobs

Construction Jobs

Procurement Opportunities & Indirect Jobs

Tax Revenue

Economic Activity

Approximately 5,500 - 7,500 jobs expected during the height of construction.

400 to 700 full-time permanent jobs once the project moves into operations.

Indirect jobs and procurement opportunities for local businesses will also be substantial.

Significant tax revenue to the local community and provincial government – supporting social projects like hospitals, recreational facilities and schools, and ensuring local infrastructure is well maintained.

Whether directly or indirectly tied to the project – will help drive positive economic growth throughout British Columbia and across Canada.



WATER ACCESS AND RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

LNG Canada recognizes the value the community places on its relationship with Kitimat’s natural surroundings and coastal waters. We have had many discussions with residents about the importance of preserving water access for multiple commercial and recreational uses.

LNG Canada is committed to contributing funding towards the preservation and creation of long-term access to the water and other recreational activities within the area. To help us achieve this vision, we will need to work with multiple parties, including First Nations, local industry such as RTA, and the District of Kitimat.

As these discussions continue, we would like to seek your input to ensure that any plans are developed based on community needs and desires.


BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITYLNG Canada is committed to encouraging a “hire local first” approach and will work together with its main contractor, CFSW LNG Constructors, to ensure local residents and businesses have opportunities to become qualified to benefit from the B.C. LNG industry.

Hire Local First ApproachLNG Canada is committed to an approach that will see the First Nations and local communities in the northwest realize economic benefits from the project. These benefits may come in the form of direct employment opportunities for qualified workers and potential contract opportunities for competitive businesses. Most of the employment and contracting opportunities during the construction phase will be through CFSW LNG Constructors (CFSW), a partnership of Chiyoda, Foster Wheeler, SAIPEM and Worley Parsons. As a result, LNG Canada and CFSW have committed to work together to help local residents and businesses become qualified for opportunities related to LNG, including:

• Investing in skills training and capacity building initiatives.

• Developing long-term partnerships with local education and training facilities in the region to develop and maintain a skilled workforce to support LNG development.

• Hosting contracting networking sessions with local businesses and CFSW to profile the expertise and capacity of businesses in the northwest.

Skilled-Trades Skilled-trade workers will play a critical role in successfully building the LNG Canada facility and associated infrastructure. LNG Canada is currently working with the provincial government, local industry, and training and educational institutions to understand the current capability of the local workforce. Based on work-to-date, we believe potential shortages may exist among the following trades that would be needed for the emerging LNG industry in British Columbia:

• Boilermakers.• Electricians (including industrial, power systems

and high voltage systems).• Welders and related machine operators.• Pipefitters.• Concrete finishers.• Construction millwrights and industrial mechanics.• Crane operators.• Gasfitters.• Heavy equipment operators & mechanics.• Insulators.• Ironworkers and structural metal fabricators

and fitters.• Trades helpers and labourers.

20



?

Please see questions 8 & 9 of the feedback form

?


The themes we heard would be important to be included in a Community Commitment Document:

• Place the safety of employees, contractors and local residents ahead of any other decision LNG Canada makes.

• Continually engage with the community transparently and honestly, being responsive and accessible, and operating in an ethical and trustworthy manner.

• Continue to consult with the community to incorporate local knowledge and expertise into LNG Canada’s operations.

• Work alongside the local community on projects that enhance the natural environment and provide access to the outdoors.

• Make social investments in the community to support the well-being of its residents.

Please look at question 10 in the feedback form

?


LNG CANADA COMMUNITY CONTRACT

LNG Canada envisions having a long-lasting and positive relationship with the local community. We recognize that to achieve this, we need to understand what is important, including the information that matters most to you, as well as the ways you would like to be involved as the proposed project moves forward.

Our Commitment to You LNG Canada is proposing to create a community contract – an agreement between the community and the company that lays out the commitments LNG Canada will make concerning how it operates and the contributions it makes to the community. Earlier this year, LNG Canada held a series of focus groups with residents, businesses and other stakeholders on this topic.

ONGING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

We are now seeking your input so we can prepare a document for the community’s review.

NEXT STEPSThe LNG Canada project takes many years of planning, studies and engaging with the local community. We believe in taking our time to make sure we are doing it right.

LNG Canada will consider the input received as part of this consultation as it continues to plan for the proposed project.

We are also working on completing our environmental assessment, which we anticipate being available later this year. This will also include consultation and opportunities for input through open houses and small group meetings.

Over the coming months, LNG Canada will continue to meet with residents, business and community groups to share updated project information. If you would like to meet with LNG Canada or receive information about the project, please email us at [email protected].


FEEDBACK FORMYour Feedback is Important. Please complete this feedback form and return it to LNG Canada by July 15, 2014. You can return it to us In-Person at the Open House, by Mail, or by Email. Or simply call us at 250.639.9292 and we will pick it up.

Understanding and Mitigating Community Concerns(Pages 6 & 7 of the Discussion Guide)

Over the past few years, LNG Canada has spent time with local residents and stakeholders to better understand concerns related to the proposed project. Please review pages 6 & 7 of the Discussion Guide to respond to the following question:

1. What additional areas of interest or concern, if any, do you have that LNG Canada should be aware of?

Project Design (refer to pages 10 -13 of the Discussion Guide)

LNG Canada has been working on developing the design for its proposed site to be located in Kitimat on approximately 350 to 400 hectares of land. Please review pages 10 - 13 of the Discussion Guide to respond to the following question:

2. Based on your review of the Discussion Guide and the 3-D Site Model available in the Information Centre, what, if any, questions do you have about the project design?

Environmental Assessment(refer to pages 16 & 17 of the Discussion Guide)

LNG Canada is currently in the pre-application stage of the EA process and we are preparing our Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate (EAC), which will outline the potential impacts of the proposed project and proposed measures to reduce, eliminate or address them. LNG Canada expects that the environmental assessment application will be ready to file sometime in the fall of 2014 and we will continue to seek input as we advance our application.

3. What study areas, if any, are you most interested in learning about during the public review of LNG Canada’s Application for an EAC later this year?

4. Looking at the 3-D model of the proposed project layout and its interaction with the surrounding environment and the Kitimat River Estuary, what advice or guidance would you have for us as we develop our environmental management plans?

Shipping / Marine Environment (refer to pages 8 & 9 of the Discussion Guide)

LNG Canada is committed to ensuring we gather local knowledge and experience, and understand how people currently use the waterways of the Douglas Channel so we can minimize impacts of our project on marine use. As part of project planning and the environmental assessment, we are developing plans to ensure the continued and safe use of Douglas Channel. As these plans are developed, we would like to hear from you:

5. What is the degree to which you think LNG carriers in the Douglas Channel could affect your use of the coastal waters off of Kitimat?

Very Much Somewhat Not at all

Please provide additional information about your use of Douglas Channel:

Approach to Social Investment (refer to page 19 of the Discussion Guide)

LNG Canada actively supports a wide range of programs and community initiatives throughout Kitimat and the surrounding areas. Our social investment program is focused on safety, community development, education and environment. It is our intention to provide sustainable projects that contribute to the well-being of the community in meaningful and lasting ways. 6. Do you have any suggestions for social investments that would benefit the community of Kitimat?

Building Local Capacity (refer to page 20 of the Discussion Guide)

LNG Canada is committed to an approach that will see local communities in the northwest realize economic benefits from the project, including employment. LNG Canada and its main contractor, CFSW, have committed to work together to help local residents and businesses become qualified for opportunities related to LNG.

7. Do you have additional suggestions from those listed above for programs and initiatives to help local residents and businesses become qualified for opportunities with the project?

Water Access / Recreational Opportunities (refer to page 21 of the Discussion Guide)

LNG Canada is committed to contributing funding towards the preservation and creation of long-term access to the water and other recreational activities within the area. To help us achieve this vision, we will need to work with multiple parties, including First Nations, local industry such as RTA and the District of Kitimat. As these discussions continue, we would like to seek your input to ensure that any plans are developed based on community needs and desires.

8. Which recreational activities do you take part in most frequently in the Kitimat area?

walking/hiking recreational fishing

kayaking/canoeing/boating bird watching

hunting other________________

none of the above

9. What amenities could enhance your recreational use of the Kitimat area?


Community Commitment Document Earlier this year, LNG Canada held a series of focus groups with residents, businesses and other stakeholders to help develop draft themes for a proposed Community Commitment Document. We are now seeking your input so we can finalize these themes and prepare a document for the community’s review. 10. Please review the draft themes on pages 22 -23 of the Discussion Guide and let us know what comments, if any, you have about these themes and if there are additional themes that we shoud consider.

Approach to Community Engagement 11. How would you rate LNG Canada’s approach to community engagement thus far?

Excellent Poor Good

Needs improvement Fair

Please explain

12. In your view what, if anything, could LNG Canada be doing to improve its community engagement?

VeryLikely

Somewhat Likely

Neither Likely /Nor Unlikely

Somewhat Unlikely

Very Unlikely

Attending an Open House

Participating in a Focus Group

Community Advisory Committee

Submitting Written Comments as Part of the Environmental Assessment

Online Surveys at lngcanada.ca

13. Please let us know how likely you would be to participate in the following potential communications and engagement activities as the project progresses:

Additional Comments 14. Is there any additional information you need, or additional comments you have about the proposed LNG Canada project?

Contact information

Name

Address

Email

Telephone

Would you like to be placed on our mailing list to receive regular project updates (all contact information is kept strictly confidential)?

Yes No I Already Receive Updates

If yes, can you ensure to provide your email or mailing address above?

Thank you.

Get in TouchLNG Canada Information Centre 176 Ocelot Rd in Kitimat lngcanada.ca

Mailing Address 176 Ocelot Rd Kitimat BC V8C 2G5

Email [email protected] Local 250-639-9292 Toll free 1-855-248-3631

http://www.lngcanada.ca



APPENDICES

APPENDIX C Notification Methods

LNG CANADA COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE AND BBQ

You Are Invited What: Community Open House and BBQ When: Tuesday June 24, 2014 Time: 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Location: LNG Canada Information Centre, 176 Ocelot Road (off Harbour Road and Haisla Blvd.) Please stop by any time between 4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. to speak with the LNG Canada project team, see our new 3-D site model and enjoy the BBQ. We hope you will get involved to learn more and help us further develop our plans. Wider consultation runs from June 24 through July 15 and includes small group meetings. There is also information available online. Please visit LNGCanada.ca for more details. For more information: www.LNGCanada.ca [email protected] 1-855-248-3631 250-639-3229

http://www.lngcanada.ca/

mailto:[email protected]

LNG Canada is committed to ensuring that

the local community has opportunities to

learn more about the proposed project and

provide input on things that matter to you.

Since we were last out in the community,

we have been working to develop updated

project information, including the design of

the facility, ways we can work together to

address interests and concerns, and identify

additional areas for community input.

We hope you will get involved to learn

more and help us further develop our plans.

Open House and BBQ

Tuesday June 24, 4-8pmLNG Canada Information Centre176 Ocelot Road (off Harbour Road and Haisla Blvd) Kitimat, B.C.

Small Group Meeting*

Wednesday, June 2512-2:30pm / 6-8pmPlease email [email protected] to RSVP for a small group meeting

Website

For More Information

Consultation materials can be accessed at lngcanada.ca

lngcanada.ca / [email protected] or local: 250-639-3229

3-D Site Model

Beginning June 24, stop by the LNG Canada Information Centre during opening hours to view our new 3-D site model

Learn More and Get Involved

Learn More & Get InvolvedLNG Canada Community Consultation in KitimatJUNE 24 – JULY 15, 2014

* These meetings will cover the same information and are designed to provide opportunities for dialogue and Q & A.

176 Ocelot Road in KitimatLocal 250.639.9292Toll Free 1.855.248.3631Email [email protected]

lngcanada.ca


http://www.lngcanada.ca

Documents

LNG Canada Community Consultation Summary