15
LISST-SL Field Testing in Western Washington Chris Curran, Jon Czuba, and Raegan Huffman USGS-Sequoia WebEx Workshop January 30, 2012

LISST-SL Field Testing in Western Washington

  • Upload
    thiery

  • View
    50

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LISST-SL Field Testing in Western Washington. Chris Curran, Jon Czuba , and Raegan Huffman. USGS-Sequoia WebEx Workshop January 30, 2012. Field Testing. F ield testing has occurred in western Washington since the LISST-SL was purchased in 2009. Swimming issue (needs more weight). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

LISST-SL Field Testing inWestern WashingtonChris Curran, Jon Czuba, and Raegan Huffman

USGS-Sequoia WebEx WorkshopJanuary 30, 2012

Page 2: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

Field Testing

Field testing has occurred in western Washington since the LISST-SL was purchased in 2009.

Page 3: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

Swimming issue (needs more weight)

Page 4: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington
Page 5: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

LISST-SL Testing Plan Perform testing on three rivers Side-by-side comp. w/ FISP samplers EDI method for stationing ADCP for Q-meas. & velocity

verifcation Point samples at 0.2, 0.6, 0.8 (P61) Depth-Integrated samples (D74) Aproximately 15-20 samples per site Samples analyzed for SSC and %fines

Page 6: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

SSC P61vs LISST

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000

50

100

150

200

250

300

350f(x) = NaN x + NaNR² = 0

PuyallupLinear (Puyallup)NooksackWhite

Suspended-sediment concentration, in mg/l

LISS

T-SL

Con

cent

ratio

n, in

mg/

l (

den

sity

=2.

65 g

/cm

3)

Page 7: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 320123456

Puyallup River0.2 depth 0.6 depth 0.8 depth

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 320

1

2

3

4

5

Nooksack River

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 320

1

2

3 White River

Particle Size Class

Conc

entr

atio

n, in

mg/

l

coarsefine

???

Page 8: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

Lessons so far… Temperature sensitive instrument DON’T TOUCH BOTTOM of the river

bed Need more weight on sampler Sequoia has been a good partner. New tail, new filter, new bleed port,

etc.. Sensitive instrument –

“temperamental” Requires sig. prep/post time in lab Some inconsistencies exist in units

Page 9: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

FLOW

12

3

4

5

Puyallup River

Page 10: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

051015202530354045

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Distance from right bank, m

Dep

th, m

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6Streamwise Velocity, m/s

12

3

4

5

Page 11: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:000

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Time (Minute : Second)

Stre

amw

ise

velo

city

at 0

.6 d

epth

, (m

/s)

Station 3 at 0.6 depth

ADCP,0.5sADCP,sm4sLISST,4s

Page 12: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

051015202530354045

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Distance from right bank, m

Dep

th, m

180

185

190

195

200

205

210

215Sediment CorrectedBackscatter (SCB), dB

12

3

4

5

Page 13: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

051015202530354045

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Distance from right bank, m

Dep

th, m

180

185

190

195

200

205

210

215Sediment CorrectedBackscatter (SCB), dB

12

3

4

5

Page 14: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington

051015202530354045

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Distance from right bank, m

Dep

th, m

180

185

190

195

200

205

210

215Sediment CorrectedBackscatter (SCB), dB

12

3

4

5

Page 15: LISST-SL  Field Testing in Western Washington