38
Life Cycle Assessment of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement to Improve Asphalt Pavement Sustainability By: Christopher D. DeDene Advised By: Mihai Marasteanu and Eshan Dave

Life Cycle Assessment of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement to ... · Asphalt Recycling • 97% of roads are surfaced with asphalt • Most “recycled” resource in the world – By tonnage

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Life Cycle Assessment of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement to Improve Asphalt Pavement

Sustainability

By: Christopher D. DeDene

Advised By: Mihai Marasteanu and Eshan Dave

Background

Asphalt Recycling •  97% of roads are surfaced with asphalt •  Most “recycled” resource in the world

– By tonnage and percentage – 50 million tons of RAP generated every

year •  Down-cycling vs. recycling •  98% of states allow at least 15% RAP in

new hot-mix asphalt (HMA)

Recycling Process

Road Ages

Create Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

Courtesy of http://myconstructionphotos.smugmug.com/

RAP

Transport Back to the Plant

Courtesy of http://myconstructionphotos.smugmug.com/

RAP Aggregate RAP

HMA

Factors to Consider

•  3 Legs of sustainability – Socially sustainable

•  People – Economically sustainable

•  Profit – Environmentally sustainable

•  Planet

www.energyeducation.tx.gov

RAP and the Planet

•  Environmental considerations of using RAP – Reduce need for virgin material

•  Binder •  Aggregate

– Greatly increased heating demand •  Need to re-melt old binder on the RAP

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

• 

Asphalt Pavement Life Cycle

Road Construction

Aggregates

Additives

Bitumen

Down-Cycled

Asphalt Plant Use

Disposal

Rehabilitation

Recycling

Objective

•  Quantify the environmental impacts of 2 pavements – 1 with entirely new materials – 1 with 15% RAP

•  Determine if emissions or energy benefits from using RAP exist

•  Is paving with RAP environmentally sustainable?

3 “Laws” of LCA

•  You Can’t win – There are some inherent emissions

•  You Can’t Break Even – No such thing as “carbon neutral”

•  You Can’t Quit – We have to do something

Carbon Footprint Perspective

•  Asphalt Mixture – 60 g C02e/ kg

Carbon Footprint Perspective

•  Asphalt Mixture – 60 g C02e/ kg

•  Orange Juice – 1600 g C02e/ kg

Jan Th. van der Zwan

Carbon Footprint Perspective

•  Asphalt Mixture – 60 g C02e/ kg

•  Orange Juice – 1600 g C02e/ kg

•  Cheeseburger – 6,000 g C02e/ kg

My LCA

•  Two different pavements – 1 made of virgin materials – 1 made of 15% RAP

•  Two transportation scenarios – Rural project (long haul distances) – Urban project (short haul distances - Local)

•  Using mid-point indicators – Energy Demand and kg CO2e/kg

My LCA

•  Analyzed only the differences between the two pavement options – Superheating of particles (RAP only) – Differences in material sources – RAP processing – Transportation distances

97%

3%

Traffic Infrastructure

Total Road Emissions

Emissions from Infrastructure 7%

18%

31%

44%

Maintenance

Paving and Compaction

HMA Production

Raw Materials (production and transport)

Model Assumptions

•  Similar performance of both roads – Neglect maintenance/rehab

•  For simplicity, only the differences were calculated – Omit use phase –  Ignore construction – No additives considered

•  Pavement is land-filled after use

Asphalt Pavement Life Cycle

Road Construction

Aggregates

Additives

Bitumen

Down-Cycled

Asphalt Plant Use

Disposal

Rehabilitation

Recycling

Asphalt Pavement Life Cycle Aggregates

Bitumen

Landfill

Asphalt Plant Disposal

15 % Recycled

Arrive at site

My LCA Parameters Functional Unit: One Lane-Mile

Virgin Material 15% RAP

Functional Unit 1 Lane-Mile 1 Lane-Mile Subbase 10 inches 10 inches Base 8 inches 8 inches HMA 6 inches 6 inches % RAP in HMA 0% 15% % Binder 5% 5% RAP % Binder N/A 4.5% % Air Voids 4% 4% Mixing Temp 260 °F 370 °F RAP Processing N/A YES

Cumulative Energy Demand

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

Virgin Mat. 15% RAP

Cum

ulat

ive

Ene

rgy

Dem

and

(M

J -e

q)

Rural Construction Urban Construction

Global Warming Potential

0 200 400 600 800

1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600

Virgin Mat. 15% RAP

Glo

bal W

arm

ing

Pote

ntia

l (k

g C

O2

- eq)

Rural Construction Urban Construction

Emissions Breakdown

41%

10%

6% 0% 0%

42%

1% Virgin Materials

Bitumen Aggregates Transportation Superheating RAP Processing Disposal Other

34%

4% 5%

15% 5%

36%

1% 15 % RAP

Bitumen Aggregates Transportation Superheating RAP Processing Disposal Other

Conclusions

•  The inclusion of 15% RAP in an asphalt pavement led to a less environmentally sustainable pavement – 28% more energy – 39% more CO2e emissions

Conclusions

•  The inclusion of 15% RAP in an asphalt pavement led to a less environmentally sustainable pavement – 28% more energy – 39% more CO2e emissions

•  85 more cheeseburgers worth of CO2 per lane mile!

Future Work

•  Look at the effect of each component –  Increase RAP percentages – More accurate superheating values

•  SimaPro is licensed software

Questions?

•  This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-105103

BONUS SLIDE •  Max RAP

allowed in base course

•  Max RAP allowed in binder course

•  * Figures Courtesy of FHWA

References

•  Jan Th. van der Zwan – AAPT Presentation. 2013

Material Amounts

SimaPro Input Purpose Virgin Material

Amount 15% RAP Amount Bitumen HMA 172.04 kg 54.84 kg

Coarse Agg. HMA 2,138.00 kg 1,817.30 kg Fine Agg. HMA 5,644.32 kg 4,797.67 kg

Gravel Base 6,770.33 kg 6,770.33 kg Sand Subbase 14,253.33 kg 14,253.33 kg

Heat, nat. gas Superheating N/A 2,886,615.60 KJ 200 KW diesel RAP Processing N/A 200.00 KWh

Transportation Distances

Material to Destination

Rural Transportation Distances (Km)

Urban Transportation Distances (Km)

Virgin Material 15% RAP

Virgin Material

15% RAP

Refinery to HMA Plant 96.56 96.56 1.61 1.61

Aggregate to HMA Plant 197.95 197.95 8.05 8.05 HMA Plant to Road Location 197.95 197.95 8.05 8.05

Base Aggregate to Road Location 16.09 16.09 16.09 16.09

RAP to HMA Plant N/A 197.95 N/A 8.05

SimaPRO Inputs (Urban) Virgin Mat Amount   15% RAP Amount  

Bitumen   172.00   kg   155.00   kg  

Gravel, crushed   8,910.00   kg   8,590.00   kg  

Sand   19,900.00   kg   19,100.00   kg  

Transport   3,470.00   tkm   3,470.00   tkm  Disposal, pvmt   29,000.00   kg   27,800.00   kg  

Superheating (Nat. Gas)   N/A   2,890.00   MJ  RAP Processing   N/A   720.00   MJ  

Virgin Pavement

15% RAP Pavement