Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Libraries in the evolving scholarly communication environment: case studies from EIFL network
Iryna KuchmaEIFL Open Access programme manager
Open Access and the Changing Role of Libraries, August 9, 2010, Gothenburg
Attribution 3.0 Unported
Who we are
EIFL is an international not-for-profit organisation with a base in Europe and a
global network of partners
(libraries organised in national library consortia)
Our mission
Enabling access to knowledge through libraries in developing and transition countries to
contribute to sustainable economic and social development
Core initiativesAccess to Knowledge for Education, Learning
and Research
EIFL Open access, EIFL Consortium management, EIFL-Licensing, EIFL-IP, EIFL-FOSS
Access to Knowledge for Sustainable Livelihoods
EIFL-PLIP: Public Library Innovation Program
48 EIFL partner countries
EIFL OAWe advocate for the adoption of open access
policies and mandates by research funding agencies, universities and research organizations
nationally and internationally
We build capacities to launch open access repositories, and to ensure their long-term
sustainability
EIFL OA (2) We empower library professionals, scholars,
educators and students to become open access advocates
Training & knowledge sharing
EIFL OA (3)36 workshops in 26 countries with participants
from over 50 countries (awareness raising, advocacy and capacity building, 2008-2010)
16 open access mandates (China, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, South Africa & Ukraine)
257 open repositories in 36 countries
2,455 open access journals in 34 countries
EIFL OA (4)Report on Open Repository Development in
Developing and Transition countries
(EIFL, the University of Kansas Libraries, the DRIVER project and Key Perspectives Ltd)
http://www.eifl.net/cps/sections/services/eifl-oa/oa-news/2010_07_05_report-on-open
Report on the implementation of open content licenses in developing and transition countries
http://www.eifl.net/cps/sections/services/eifl-oa/oa-news/2010_07_09_report-on-implementation
Key objectives 2010 - 2011Coordinating open access policies
Encouraging networking and knowledge sharing (OA repositories and OA journals)
Outreach campaigns to the research community and students
OpenAIRE (Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe)
China - National Science Library, CAS
China – NSL CAS (2)
a Knowledge repository http://ir.las.ac.cn
Open access mandate
Key objectives 2010 - 2011Coordinating open access policies
Encouraging networking and knowledge sharing (OA repositories and OA journals)
Outreach campaigns to the research community and students
OpenAIRE (Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe)
Kyrgyzstan Library Information Consortium
Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network
a National open repository eLABa (Electronic Academic Library of Lithuania http://elaba.library.lt):
Lithuanian ETDs, books, journals, conference proceedings, working papers, data
a Law on Science of the Republic of Lithuania requires public access to research results
Vilnius University – Open Access mandate
Mozambique
Ukraine
Macedonia
Digital repositories support (2)
Macedonia (2)
Moldova
http://www.library.up.ac.za/openup/docs/UPmandateAfrica.pdf
UkraineOpen access to research outputs funded from
the state budget of Ukraine
(the Law of Ukraine “On the principles of Developing Information Society in Ukraine in 2007-2015”,
January 9, 2007 )
As a result of this mandate 1,300 journals are publicly available http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal
Armenia - Fundamental Scientific Library, NAS
Serbia http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs
Serbia http://scindeks.nb.rs
Open Repository Development
Report on Open Repository Development in Developing and Transition countries
(EIFL, the University of Kansas Libraries, the DRIVER project and Key Perspectives Ltd)
http://www.eifl.net/cps/sections/services/eifl-oa/oa-news/2010_07_05_report-on-open
Motivations83% to increase the visibility of the institution's
research output
66% to provide free access to the institution's research output
62% to preserve the institution's research output
Motivations (2)35% the repository was set up to help evaluate
researchers and departments
34% the repository was set up in response to requests from faculty
Stimulants57% Increased visibility and citations for the publications of the academics in our institution
32% Simple and user-friendly depositing process
32% Institutional policy of mandatory depositing
32% Awareness-raising efforts among the academics
Stimulants (2) 27% Interest from the decision makers within institution
16% The requirements of research-funding organisations in our country regarding depositing
research output in Open Access repositories
14% Policy to safeguard the long-term preservation of the deposited material
11% Institutional policy of accountability
11% Integration/linking of the digital repository with other systems in our institution
Inhibitors49% Lack of an institutional policy of mandatory
depositing
40% Lack of requirements of research funding organisations in our country regarding depositing
research output in Open Access repositories
33% Lack of interest from the decision makers
Inhibitors (2) 33% The situation with regard to copyright of (to be)
published materials and the knowledge about this among academics in our institution
30% Lack of an institutional policy of accountability
Lack of awareness-raising efforts among the academics in our institution
21% Lack of coordination of a national body for digital repositories
ChallengesMajor challenge: Content recruitment (42%)
Challenges:
50% Engendering faculty awareness and engagement
46% Securing adequate funding and other resources 42% Copyright issues
41% Communicating with faculty about the repository
35% Integrating the repository into workflow and other existing structures
31% Staffing issues
COAR
Working Groups 1. Repository content
Working Groups 3. Repository and Repository Networks Support & Training
COAR WG 3 – Who we areIryna Kuchma, EIFL (chair)
Marjan Vernooy, SURF (co-chair)
Neil Jacobs, JISC
Gyöngyi Karacsony, University and National Library University of Debrecen
Ikuko Tsuchide, DRF, Osaka University Library
Kathleen Shearer, CARL,
Paola C. Bongiovani, Sistema Nacional de Repositorios Digitales en Ciencia y Tecnología, Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva)
Anja Oberländer, Universität Konstanz – Bibliothek, Projekt Open Access
Marnix van Berchum, SURF
Alenka Kavčič – Čolić, NUK
COAR WG 3 – why?Facilitating the emergence of new profession
- repository manager
Fostering the exchange of ideas and expertise
Sharing experiences and best practices
A global forum for the exchange of information and experiences
Knowledge sharing through peer-to-peer learning and information exchange
Community of professionals
Thank you! Questions?
iryna.kuchma[@]eifl.nethttp://www.eifl.net
Attribution 3.0 Unported