61
LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 CP VIOLATION Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics Chris Parkes

LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

LHCb

Eduardo RodriguesUniversity of Glasgow

SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011

CP VIOLATION

Part IV

CP violation and B Physics

Part IV

CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes

Page 2: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 2

Outline

PHENOMENOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTS

III. CP violation and Kaon physics

IV. CP violation and B physicsB factories, old and future experiments

Mixing in neutral B mesons

Benchmark B decays

Rare B decays

V. CP Violation and D physics

VI. Concluding remarksPresent status and future ahead

Page 3: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 3

Overview of B (and D) physics CPV experiments

B factories (2000 2010): electron-positron at γ(4S) resonance BaBar (SLAC, USA), Belle (KEK, Japan)

Discovered CP Violation in B system, angle β Tested CKM mechanism D mixing established

BelleII for high luminosity Super KEK-B starts 2015 TeVatron run II (2001 2011):

Proton- anti-proton CDF, D0

Discovered Bs Mixing LHC (2009 )

LHCb (also ATLAS and CMS to some extent) Discovered Bsμμ

CP Violation in Bs system D mixing at 5σ

Page 4: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 4

Of the 6 orthogonality relations the CKM matrix satisfies

the “bd” term is central in many B-meson decays:

CP violation studies with B mesons?

tbtstd

cbcscd

ubusud

CKM

VVV

VVV

VVV

Vikjkj

ijVV *

b t d,s

s,d t bW W

b

s,d

d,s

t tb

W

WcdcbVV *

udubVV *tdtbVV *

“The” unitarity triangle (“bd”)

0*** bdtdtbcdcbudub VVVVVV

butransitions

bctransitions

B0

mixing

Of the 6 orthogonality relations the CKM matrix satisfies

the “bd” term is central in many B-meson decays:

0*** bdtdtbcdcbudub VVVVVV

butransitions

bctransitions

B0

mixing

Page 5: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

B factories,

old and future experiments

Page 6: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 6

Ingredients of B physics experimentOscillations time dependent

measure time from distance (d=γct) travelled in experiment

hence B needs to be produced boosted

Symmetric e+e- won’t work ! p-p ok, partons different energies

B decays (lifetime=1.5ps) – observe decay products

Bs oscillations very fast

excellent Vertex Detector

Final state decay products (mostly) : pion, kaon; electron, muon,

Need excellent particle ID

B-hadrons are heavy and long-lived !

Page 7: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 7

Idea of an asymmetric "B factory"

Oddone & Dorfan in PEP-II Tunnel, 2003

• ϒ(4s) since heavy enough to decay into BB

• Produce the (4S) with a strong boost in lab frame – different energies e-, e+

• BB in coherent state – oscillate together (EPR Paradox)

• Find if B or B at decay time from final state

• Deduce the t from the distance between the two B vertices along the boost axis

Page 8: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 8

B factories PEP-II (BaBar) and KEKB (Belle)

• Asymmetric beams boosted B’s

• Time difference between B decays z

Page 9: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 9

High rate– statistics limited channel

Why study CP violation at a hadron collider?

Clean environment– no additional tracks

Initial state– B0B0 or B+B-

B mesons ~ 20% stot

– simpler triggering Rich programme but messy environment

e+ e-

(BaBar)

pp(D0)

Production of all typesBs and b-hadrons

_

Page 10: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 10

~ 6.23 Km long √s = 1.96 TeV

Started operation in 1987

Run I : collected about 100 pb-1 until 1996

Run II: between 2001 and 2011

(after long shutdown until 2000)

CDF and D0 @ TeVatron, Fermilab

Page 11: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 11

LHC @ CERN and LHCb

9 km diameter

GenevaJura

CERN

Page 12: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 12

LHCb environment

LHC environment pp collisions at ECM = 8 / 14 TeV

tbunch = 25/50 ns 40/20 MHz bunch crossing rate

<L> = 4.1032 cm-2 s-1 @ LHCb interaction region

Forward peaked, correlated production

~ 1 cm

Bp-p collision

Measure distance production

(primary vertex p-p) till decay

(B decay vertex) to get timeLHCb VErtex LOcator (VELO)

Silicon detector discs along beam direction

pp

Page 13: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 13

The LHCb experiment @ the LHC – characteristics

Forward spectrometer

Acceptance: 1.9 < h < 4.9

Nr of B’s / year: 1012

Detector: excellent tracking excellent PID

Reconstruction: - muons: easy - hadronic tracks: fine - electrons: OK - p0’s: possible but difficult - neutrinos: no

p p

Tracking:Silicon & Straw tubesMagnetic field

Calorimeters:Electromagnetic &Hadronic calorimeters- Critical (with muons) for triggering

Vertexing:High precision silicon detectors (10μm position resolution) very close to collision point

B flight path of the order 5-10mm

RICH performance:Cherenkov radiation.Measures velocity, combine with momentum to get massParticle identification in p range 1-100 GeVp, K ID efficiency > 90%, misID<~10%

Mission statement

- Search for new physics probing the flavour structure of the SM- Study CP violation and rare decays with beauty & charm hadrons

Mission statement

- Search for new physics probing the flavour structure of the SM- Study CP violation and rare decays with beauty & charm hadrons

Page 14: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Mixing in neutral B mesons

Page 15: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 15

Neutral B-mesons “identity card”: 2 types of neutral B mesons

24;72.0

8.17

5.0103.3

1.0,105

1

113

3

s

ss

d

dd

s

d

s

ss

d

dd

mx

mx

psm

psGeVm

yy

Neutral B system in nature

Oscillations parameter

Small lifetime differences

Large mass differences(~100 times larger in Bd

case compared to K system)

B0 = db

Bs = sb

B0 = db

Bs = sb

B=+1B=-1

Page 16: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Reminder of Natural Units, =c=1

Energy GeV Momentum GeV/c (abbreviated to GeV) Mass GeV/c2

Length (GeV/c)-1 c=0.197GeVfm=1 [1fm=1E-15m]– Natural unit of length 1GeV-1=0.197fm

Time (GeV/ )-1 =6.6E-25GeVs– Natural unit of time 1GeV-1=6.6E-25s

Cross-section (GeV/c)-2 1barn=10-28m2

– Natural unit of xsec =1GeV-2=0.389mb Charge - ‘Heavyside-Lorenz units’ ε0=1 Use dimensionless ‘fine structure constant’

137

1

44

2

0

2

e

c

e

Can quote mass

in seconds-1

Page 17: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 17

b

du, c, t W-

W+_

d

b_u, c, t

b

d u, c, tW- W+

_

d

b_

u, c, t___

B0B0-

(and similarly for Bs)

Neutral B-mesons mixing

Feynman (box) diagrams for neutral B-meson mixing:

Dominated by top quark contribution :

Page 18: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 18

Dominated by top quark contribution :

b

du, c, t W-

W+_

d

b_u, c, t

b

d u, c, tW- W+

_

d

b_

u, c, t___

B0B0-

12

*12

M

M

p

q

*

*

tdtb

tdtb

VV

VV

p

qFor B0

For B0s *

*

tstb

tstb

VV

VV

p

q

(and similarly for Bs)

Neutral B-mesons mixing

Feynman (box) diagrams for neutral B-meson mixing:

Sensitivity to a CKM triangle side and

angle b

Sensitivity to side and equivalent angle bs

Page 19: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 19

Dominated by top quark contribution :

b

du, c, t W-

W+_

d

b_u, c, t

b

d u, c, tW- W+

_

d

b_

u, c, t___

B0B0-

(and similarly for Bs)

Neutral B-mesons mixing

Feynman (box) diagrams for neutral B-meson mixing:

Page 20: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 20

ARGUS, 1987

Observed a fully reconstructed, mixed, event, with no possible background.

Measured the like-sign lepton fraction, and found that ~17% of B0 mesons mix before they decay tB~1.5 ps, Dm~0.5/ps

Phys. Lett. B 192, 245 (1987)

2

12

1

0.00002 psGeV

0.5ps

tB

mm

c

Discovery of B0 mixing

First hint of a really large top mass !

Page 21: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 21

Belle: K. Abe et al., PRD 71, 072003 (2005) Babar: B. Aubert et al., PRD 73, 012004 (2006)

Belle: B0 lifetime BaBar: md

Some state-of-the-art B0 mixing measurements

B0 oscillates once every 8 decay times ! (2 /p Dm )t

Page 22: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 22

Measuring Bs mixing – tagging & decay time

opposite-side K

jet charge

Decay modetags b flavorat decay

2nd B tags production flavor Proper decay timefrom displacement (L)and momentum (p)

Need to determine:– Flavour at production tagging– Flavour at decay, from final state– B decay length

Page 23: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 23

Bs Mixing Measurement

CDF discovery 2006, LHCb measurement 2011

Oscillations occur at 3 trillion Hz !

Observed amplitude is not 1 as smeared

- Mistag (B or B) of events

- Resolution on time

Line is fitted oscillations

Points are data

Low background

Most precise measurement of |Vtd/Vts|

Δms= 17.768 ± 0.023 (stat) ± 0.006 (syst) ps−1

Page 24: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 24

Key Points – B experiments & mixing

• Dedicated Experiments

• Asymmetric e+e- collider B Factories (Babar, Belle, Belle II)

• pp collider (LHCb)

• B needs to be boosted

• Excellent Vertexing and Particle ID

• Neutral systems: B0 and Bs

• Very different oscillation rates

• Very fast Bs oscillations (3 trillion Hz!)

• Mixing through box diagrams with top quark

• Flavour tagging at production

• Flavour tagging at decay

Page 25: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Benchmark B decays: α, β,ϒ

Page 26: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 26

The CKM matrix in terms of the Wolfenstein parameters

B0 and Bs mixing phases sensitivity

CKM angle measurements with B decays

1ˆˆ12

1

21

423

22

52

32

iAAiA

AiA

iA

VCKM

iub eV

itd eV si

ts eV

cdcbVV *

udubVV *tdtbVV *

“The” unitarity triangle (“bd”)

a

g b

The standard techniques for the angles

b : B0 mixing (phase β) (+ single b c decay)a : B0 mixing (phase β) + single b u decay (phase γ)g : b u (phase γ) (interference with b c)

Page 27: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 27

Measurement of sin(2b) – B0 J/Y Ks decay

Measurement type : time-dependent CP asymmetries of B decay to CP-eigenstate final state

The “golden mode” B0 J/Y Ks :

Theoretically clean way of measuring the b angle

Clean experimental signature (J/Yμ+μ-; Ks+-)

Large (for a B meson) branching ratio ~ 10-4

ff

ffCP tA

)(

The B-factories were built for the

measurement of b !c.f. CPLEAR K0 to π+π-

+

e-iφ

Amplitude 1 Amplitude 2

Process via interference with/without mixing

Page 28: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 28

Angles – measured from interference

Both give same rate - Interference necessary but not sufficient

Two routes A1,A2 to same final state

- hence interference sensitive to phase

Page 29: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 29

Angles – measured from interference

Additional phase κ that doesn’t flip under CP, allows ϕ to be measured

Page 30: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Oscillation & Decay

30

t=0 t

B0

B0

B0

B0

B0

B0

Amplitude

Amplitude

Rate

Rate

Page 31: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Measuring a CKM angle

31

But in B system and put

Gives: This extra i is the phase difference (here k=900) we need

1. Origin of extra phase k

2. Origin of weak phase ϕ

If and hence Lets assume we can write

Making these substitutionsThe two phase differences give terms

The rate difference is time dependent

( hence assumed i.e. no direct CP Violation)

Page 32: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Measuring a CKM angle

32

simplifying

Time dependent oscillations with amplitude of asymmetry given by phase ϕ

As x~1, only part of an oscillation seen

Page 33: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 33

Aside on getting CKM phase or phase *

Feynman rules:

Vud if incoming d-quark or outgoing anti-d quark

Vud* if incoming u-quark or outgoing anti-u quark

Quantities to find:

Page 34: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 34

Which CKM angle is measured ?

Page 35: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 35

Showing that φ=2β from CKM elements

Page 36: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 36

Page 37: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 37

ff

ffCP tA

)(

β accurately

measured

β=21.5±0.80

(HFAG summer 2012)

Page 38: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 38

Measurement of sin(2a) – B0 pp decay ?

Tree diagrams only:

Routes to final state

with and without mixing.

Interference of these gives angle.

mixing decay

Page 39: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 39

Measurement of sin(2a) – B0 pp decay ?

But there is another route to this same final state with non-negligible

amplitudeHence not a clean measurement of α

Solutions: use channels with small penguin

contributiuons, or correct for penguin effect

Page 40: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 40

Measurement of sin(2a) – B0 pp (and other hh) decays

No identification

Purity = 9.5%

With pion identification

Purity = 85%, Eff. =90%

LHCb:

particle identification is crucial !

From all channels α moderately well measured

α=85.4±4.00 (CKM fitter Aug. 2013)

Page 41: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 41

B D0 K : - theoretically very clean way of measuring g

- sensitivity to g from interference between the 2 diagrams

- only requirement: D0 and D0 decay to common final state

- final state contains D - final state contains D-bar

Measurement of g – popular (family of) methods

u

bB 0D

u

c

Ku

s

u

b

B

Ku

s

0Dc

u

*uscbVV *

csubVV

Currently least well measured angle but LHCb changing this

Note – charged B here, so no mixing

Weak phase

But also relative strong phase (δ) between

the amplitudes of the two diagrams

- nuisance parameter

Page 42: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 42

1ˆˆ12

1

21

423

22

52

32

iAAiA

AiA

iA

VCKM

In both cases only complex phase is in Vub element, so this measures γ

Measuring gamma

1. Why is this γ ?

2. How to get round strong phase

Interference of amplitudes sensitive to

Page 43: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 43

1ˆˆ12

1

21

423

22

52

32

iAAiA

AiA

iA

VCKM

In both cases only complex phase is in Vub element, so this measures γ

Measuring gamma

1. Why is this γ ?

2. How to get round strong phase

Interference of amplitudes sensitive to

or

Hence using all four processes can get γ

Combining all channels

γ poorly measured yet

γ=68.0±8.30 (CKM fitter Aug. 2013)

Page 44: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Hot Topic -

Semi-leptonic B Asymmetry

CP Violation in mixing

Page 45: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 45

Like sign dimuon asymmetryD0 Collab.

B0/B0s

B0/B0s

t=0 t

B0/B0s

B0/B0s

B0/B0s

B0/B0s

d d

bBo

c

μ-

ν

W-

D+

example decay:

• Produce BB pair (or Bs)

• If one oscillates before decaying

get two like sign leptons (++ or --)

• If no CP Violation in mixing get

N++ =N--

Page 46: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 46

New Physics ? Situation unclear –improved measurements needed(excellent PhD project…)

Like sign dimuon asymmetry: current results

D0 – B and Bs decays inclusively

Tevatron: proton anti-proton – equal matter anti-matter

LHC proton proton – production asymmetry, makes analysis more tricky

but statistics higher

LHCb – Bs only:

first result compatible SM and D0 !

Asy

mm

etry

B0 s

Asymmetry B0

World average 2.9σ away from SM !

Page 47: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Direct CP Violation in B0/Bs

including discovery of

CP Violation in Bs system

Page 48: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 48

Time-integrated measurement: Direct CP Violation

Direct CP Violation: two-body B0 & Bs decays

Page 49: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 49

Time-integrated measurement: Direct CP Violation

Direct CP Violation: two-body B0 & Bs decays

Page 50: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 50

Time-integrated measurement: Direct CP Violation

Direct CP Violation: two-body B0 & Bs decays

Use f

Page 51: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 51

However several different two-body B decays

Separate with Particle ID and mass for B0/Bs

Direct CP Violation: two-body B0 & Bs decays

(also Λb, 3-body backgrounds)

Bhh, (h=K,π)

Page 52: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

10.5σ

Asymmetry

Chris Parkes

52

PRL110, 221601 2013

B B

BsBs6.5σ

Asymmetry FIRST CP

Direct CP Violation: two-body B0 & Bs decays

Page 53: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Dalitz Plots – three body decays

Bhhh

Page 54: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 54

Dalitz Plot – Visualize three body decays

Dalitz Plot: Scatter plot in mab2, mac

2

If no intermediate structure then uniformly populated

(inside kinematic bounds)

If intermediate resonances, r,

then plot will have internal structure

Shorter-lived resonances – larger widths

Richard Dalitz

• Energy Conservation sets boundaries of plot

• Q = TA+TB+TC,

• Q energy released in decay of P,

• Ti K.E. of product i

m2bc

Page 55: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 55

CP Violation in B+hhh

• Make Dalitz plot for B+,B-

• Any difference is CP violation

Dalitz PlotACP in Dalitz plot bins

• Local regions of large CP violation(empty bands in plot are regions that have been cut-out as used as cross-checks)

ρ0(770), f0(980)

K*(890), K*(1430)

χc0

• Resonances seen in plot

Page 56: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Rare B decays

Page 57: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 57

Rare Decay Loops

Page 58: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 58

Rare B decays – All active research topics at LHCb

DECAY TYPE B.R. (approx.)

B0 K*0 g Bs f g

B0 w gRadiative penguin

4.0 x 10-5

2.1 x 10-5

4.6 x 10-7

B0 K*0 m+ m- Electroweak penguin 1.2 x 10-6

Bs f f

B0 f KS

Gluonic penguin1.3 x 10-6

1.4 x 10-6

Bs m+ m - Rare box diagram 3.5 x 10-9

Radiative penguin

Page 59: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 59

The B(s) m+m- decay (1/2)

• Really really rare! But well predicted in SM

SM box SM Penguin

• Sensitive to New Physicsin SUSY models

• Unique Experimental signature• Easy to identify / trigger – good for ATLAS/CMS as well

Page 60: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

60

25 year long search

Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 231801

SM theory

Powerful constraint on SUSY

Page 61: LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues University of Glasgow SUPA Lectures, Glasgow, January 2011 Part IV CP violation and B Physics Part IV CP Violation and B Physics

Chris Parkes 61

Key Points – B section

• CKM Angles

• Measured from interference of two routes to same final state

• sin(2b) – B0 J/Y Ks

• sin(2a) – B0 p+p- decay, and the problem of ‘’penguin pollution’’

• angle ϒ - B- D0 K-, and strong phases

• Semileptonic B asymmetry, D0 experiment discrepancy with SM

• Discovery of (Direct) CP Violation in Bs system, LHCb

• BsK- π+

• Dalitz Plots and use as tools for CP violation, LHCb

• B+hhh

• Rare B Decays

• Discovery of LHCb