Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060
102
107
1012
1017
Langley's bolometerGolay Cell
Golay Cell
Boyle and Rodgers bolometer
F.J.Low's cryogenic bolometer
Composite bolometer
Composite bolometer at 0.3K
Spider web bolometer at 0.3KSpider web bolometer at 0.1K
1year
1day
1 hour
1 second
Development of thermal detectors for far IR and mm-waves
time
requ
ired
to m
ake
a m
easu
rem
ent (
seco
nds)
year
Photon noise limit for the CMB
Spider-Web Bolometers
Absorber
Thermistor
Built by JPL Signal wire
2 mm
•The absorber is micro machined as a web of metallized Si3N4 wires, 2 m thick, with 0.1 mm pitch.
•This is a good absorber for mm-wave photons and features a very low cross section for cosmic rays. Also, the heat capacity is reduced by a large factor with respect to the solid absorber.
•NEP ~ 2 10-17 W/Hz0.5 is achieved @0.3K
•150KCMB in 1 s
•Mauskopf et al. Appl.Opt. 36, 765-771, (1997)
1 10 100 1000 100000.01
0.1
1
10
150 GHz,10% BW, 2
150 GHz, 10% BW, 1 cm2sr 30 GHz, 10% BW, 2
erro
r per
pix
el (
K)
integration time (s)
The ultimate sensitivity plot !!
CMB BLIP
Quando si e’ limitati dal rumore intrinseco dell’ osservabile , l’ unico modo per migliorare la
misura e’ renderla piu’ efficiente in termini di durata.
Usando un mosaico di rivelatori di grande formato si aumenta la
“mapping speed”
• Con un mosaico di N rivelatori si puo’ aumentare il rapporto S/N di un fattore N1/2
• E in realta’ di piu’, a causa della presenza di striping e altri effetti non gaussiani nei segnali di ciascuno dei rivelatori, che possono essere rimossi sfruttando le correlazioni tra pixel adiacenti.• Comunque stiamo parlando di mosaici di grandi dimensioni, dell’ ordine di 10000 rivelatori
W-Detector arrays
A.Lee, Berkeley
CMB & Cosmology• In the primeval plasma a huge number of photons was in equilibrium with matter (109/b). Equilibrium was maintained by Thomson scattering between s and charged particles (mostly e‐).
• With the expansion of the universe, the photon/matter plasma cooled down, until H atoms could form (3000K, 380000y after the big bang).
• The interaction of photons with neutral matter becomenegligible, and they where released, free to propagate withoutfurther interactions with matter.
• At that epoch, they formed a 3000K blackbody, i.e. an overwhelming background of optical and IR light filling the universe.
• Those photons are still filling the universe today, after an exapansion of all distances (and wavelengths) by a factor 1100, and form a faint, cold background (2.735K blackbody), mostly atmm wavelengths: is the CosmicMicrowave Background (CMB).
• The CMB carries information about all the phases of the evolution of the Universe.
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
What you can do studying the CMB:Measurement of B‐mode polarization, Gaussianity, and absolute spectrum. Study the inflation process at ultra‐high energies (1019GeV)
Spectrum: proof of the hot big bang. Spectral distortios: probe epochs before recombination and new physics
Galaxy clusters studies and surveys via the Sunyaev‐Zeldovich effect: (>106 : all clusters with M>1014M within our horizon )
CMB lensing: Map the gravitational potential all the way to z=1100
Maps of the primary anisotropy and E‐mode polarization of the CMB: Study the oscillations of the primeval plasma, cosmological parameters.
2 3
1 4
5
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
What you can do studying the CMB:
That’s why since 1965 CMB measurements have been steadily improved ..
Measurement of B‐mode polarization, Gaussianity, and absolute spectrum. Study the inflation process at ultra‐high energies (1019GeV)
Spectrum: proof of the hot big bang. Spectral distortios: probe epochs before recombination and new physics
Galaxy clusters studies and surveys via the Sunyaev‐Zeldovich effect: (>106 : all clusters with M>1014M within our horizon )
CMB lensing: Map the gravitational potential all the way to z=1100
Maps of the primary anisotropy and E‐mode polarization of the CMB: Study the oscillations of the primeval plasma, cosmological parameters.
2 3
1 4
5
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
BOOMERanG (2000) the first resolved map of CMB anisotropy
8 minutes
13.7 billion years
Here, now
Here, now
Hot gas in the photosphere of the sun
Hot gas in the primeval universe, at recombination
redshift, redshift, redshift, redshift, redshift, redshift …
Looking at the primeval plasma at recombination is like looking at the photosphere of the sun:
COBE (1992) the most accurate spectrum of CMB brightness ever
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
visw
• The study of solar oscillations allows us to study the interior structure of the sun, well below the photosphere.
• The study of the structure of CMB anisotropy, due to oscillations of the primeval plasma, allows us to study the universe well behind (well before) the cosmic photosphere (the recombination epoch)
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
Looking at the primeval plasma at recombination is like looking at the photosphere of the sun:
PP. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
CMB anisotropyResults of the Planck satellite
Brightness fluctuations: + 180 ppmscale
15
A precision measurement: 100K rms
Over three decades in angle, with the same instruement(intercalibration!)
You see seven peaks by eye
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
CMB anisotropy
*,,2
)1(2
)1(mmaaCD
16
6 parameters model(‐CDM) best fit
HenceGeometry ()Kinematics (H) Composition (, DM , b)Origin of the structures (ns)
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
CMB anisotropy
Dark energy 68.3%
Dark matter26.8%
Baryonic matter4.9%
CMB polarization: why
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B-modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
-
-
+
-
+ x
y
--
+
-
+
x
y
-x
y
-10ppm +10ppm
= e‐ at last scattering
• CMB photons are last scattered at recombination.
• It’s a Thomson scattering, and any quadrupole anisotropy in the incomingphotons produces a degreeof linear polarization in the scattered photons.
• Density perturbationsproduce a small degree of linear polarization (E‐modes)
Same flux as seen in the electronrest frame
Quadrupole anisotropydue to Doppler effect
redshift
blueshift
blueshift
redshift
+ +
+
+
- -
-
-
Velocity fieldat recombination
Expect E‐modes and a T‐E anti‐correlation
Hot, over‐denseregion
Cold, under‐dense region
Origin of E‐modesresulting
CMB polarizationfield
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B-modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
E‐modes
Origin of B‐modes
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
• Cosmic Inflation in the very early universe stretches the geometry to flat, and produces:– Scalar (density) perturbations, responsible for
primary CMB anisotropy and velocity fields at recombination ‐> E‐modes (and also of current large‐scale structures in the universe)
– Tensor (gravitational waves) perturbations, with ultra‐long wavelengths, travelling across the universe.
• At recombination, tensor perturbations also induce a small degree of polarization in the CMB, with both gradient and curl symmetries.
• The latter is called the B‐mode. • Moreover, lensing of E‐modes by intervening
matter concentrations between recombination and us also produces B‐modes, important at small scales.
How to separate B‐modes and E‐modes
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
• From the measurements of the Stokes Parameters Q and U of the linear polarization field we can recover both irrotational and rotational alm by means of modified Legendre transforms:
nYiaaniUQ mm
Bm
Em
2
,)(
nYniUQnYniUQnWdi
a
nYniUQnYniUQnWda
mmBm
mmEm
22
22
)()(21
)()(21
E‐modes, produced by scalar and tensor perturbations
B‐modes, produced only by tensor perturbations
Polarization is a spin-2 quantity: spin-2 basis
Level of inflationary B‐modes
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
• Since scalar perturbations do not produce B‐modes, and lensing B‐modesare produced mainly at small scales, B‐modes at large scales are a signature of cosmic inflation
• The amplitude of this effect is very small, but depends on the energy‐scale of inflation. In fact the amplitude of tensor modes normalized to the scalar ones r is:
• and
• There are theoretical arguments to expect that the energy scale of inflation is close to the scale of GUT i.e. around 1016 GeV.
• If ones detects primordial B‐modes, can constrain the energy‐scale of inflation.
• The current upper limits on B‐modes at large scales give T/S<0.1 (at 2)
GeV1006.101.0 16
4/14/1
Vr
GeV102
1.02
)1(16
4/1
maxVKcB
inflaton potential
The signal is extremely weak• Nobody really knows how to detect B‐modes.• Whatever smart, ambitious experiment we design to detect
the B‐modes:– needs to be extremely sensitive – use large arrays of detectors to boost
the speed of the sky survey– needs an extremely careful control of systematic effects – use a clean
optical configuration and polarization modulation techniques– needs careful control of local polarized emission (foregrounds) – use
multibandmeasurements– will need independent experiments, with orthogonal systematics,
confirming the result.
• There is still a long way to go.• QUBIC is an original instrument, devoted to sensitive and
accurate CMB polarization measurements with an uniqueexperimental setup.
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
CMB polarization: state of the art
CMB-S4 science book, 2016
???
A lot of work, but no detection of inflationary B‐modes (large scales, low level !)
Inflation B‐modesP. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
Dotted lines = primordial B‐modes (to be detected)Continuous lines = primordial B‐modes + lensing B‐modes
Detected signal is Interstellar Dust + Lensing [Planck+BICEP2]
Focussing on B‐modes:
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
The current effort of a number of experiments is to obtain deeper and cleaner measurements, to detect the primordial part of the signal (dotted lines)
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
Focussing on B‐modes:
How to measure CMB polarization: 1) polarization modulation
• i.e. how to modulate an extremely weak polarized signal in an overwhelming, structured unpolarized background.
• OPTION 1: take a mm‐wave photometer array, add a polarizer in front of the detectors, and rotate the entire photometer around its optical axis. – This was made with Planck, BICEP, etc.– The main disadvantage is that if the beam is slightly elliptical (as usually is), unpolarized
sources offset from the beam center will be modulated exactly as linearly polarized signals. Intensity to polarization leakage has to be corrected for.
• OPTION 2: take a mm‐wave photometer array and convert it into a Stokes polarimeter, i.e. add a Half‐Wave‐Plate and a polarizer, and spin the HWP to modulate polarization (without modulating intensity). – This is the option used by several new experiments, including e.g. SPIDER, LSPE and QUBIC
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
SRHRPDW VV )()(
SKY
polarizedsignal
x
y
principalaxis
HWPPOLARIZERDETECTORS
HWP rotation: continuous or stepping
i
i
i
i
VUQI
S
Polarized sky brightness:
Power on detectors:
t )24sin()24cos(21 sssV UQIW
How to measure CMB polarization: 2) beam forming
• CMB polarimeter arrays work at mm‐waves, where the beam shape is set by diffraction effects in the optics, in addition to detector properties.
• Three classes of instruments: imagers or interferometers (coherent or bolometric).
• Coherent interferometers are too complex to make, for a large array of detectors (we need large arrays, with thousands of pixels to achieve the required sensitivity). So we will consider only bolometric (Fizeau) interferometers in the following.
• Direct imager: telescope followed by an array of detectors in its focal plane. All recent CMB polarization instruments (but one) use this configuration.
• Fizeau interferometer: Array of apertures (horns) whose signals are combined so that each aperture illuminates the entire detector array. QUBIC uses this configuration, with significant advantages.
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
Distant source(boresight)
Focal plane withImage of the source(only center pixel illuminated)
Lens (telescope)
Regular array of apertures
Distant source(boresight)Imager Fizeau
Interferometer
focal len
gth
focal len
gth
Focal plane with uniform illumination from all the apertures (all pixels illuminated): Vector sum of the fields from all the apertures in phase.
Lens(beam combiner)
Each aperture is a source. In this case, since the source in the sky is in the boresight, they are all in‐phase.
S. Masi, CSN2‐INFN 2016/09/14
Distant source(off‐axis)
Focal plane withImage of the source(only side pixel illuminated)
Lens (telescope)
Regular array of apertures
Each aperture is a source, in this case they have different phases, depending on how‐much off‐axis the source is.
Lens(beam combiner)
Distant source(off‐axis)Imager Fizeau
Interferometer
focal len
gth
focal len
gth
Phase shift
xuie2
Focal plane with illumination from all the apertures. The vector sum of the fields from all the apertures is a system of fringes, depending on how‐much off‐axis the source is.
S. Masi, CSN2‐INFN 2016/09/14
31
0.5 mm PWV2 mm PWV
40 km
240K=2%
240K=0.1%
How to measure CMB polarization: 3) site
P. de Bernardis, Searching for B‐modes in the polarization of the CMB with QUBIC, Malargue, 19/09/2017
2 options:• Ground based, low PWV, stable
site, long integration time: South Pole, Andes
• Stratospheric Balloon, no PWV, limited integration time
• QUBIC will work from the Andes, for at least 2 years
Lo sviluppo di mosaici di grande formato di rivelatori sensibili alla
polarizzazione CMB :
• Puo’ dare ottimi risultati per misure dall’ Antartide e da pallone (tempo scala 4 anni)
• Puo’ permetterci di candidarci come fornitori dei rivelatori per la missione “deep space” post-Planck dedicata alla polarizzazione del fondo a microonde (tempo scala 10-15 anni)– NASA - Inflation Probe– ESA - Cosmic Vision– ASI - BPOL
Planck
Bolom.Array
From theEBEXproposal
Large Bolometer Arrays
30’
150 GHz 220 GHz 340 GHz 540 GHz
• >400 TES bolometers for the OLIMPO balloon telescope devoted to SZ and CMB anisotropy (Silvia Masi, Roma)
Altri impieghi di questi mosaici:• Astrofisica e Astroparticelle:
– Studio di nubi molecolari nel sub-mm (origine della vita, SAFIR)
– Spettroscopia ottica risolta temporalmente di pulsars (astrofisica relativistica, relativita’ generale, fisica dei plasmi magnetizzati e della materia ad altissme densita’)
– Studio del mezzo intergalattico nell’ UV (condizioni di ionizzazione, formazione delle strutture in fase non lineare)
– Spettroscopia X a immagini (astrofisica delle alte energie, Constellation X, ZEUS)
– Fisica dei Raggi Cosmici• Medicina
– camere X sensibili, camere FIR per mappe T)• Controllo Ambientale, controlli non invasivi
Mosaici di rivelatori fotolitografati: Due tecnologie possibili
• TES– Mosaici di Transition Edge Sensors, bolometri con
termometro a superconduttore.– Diversi gruppi hanno gia’ sviluppato la tecnologia del
sensore (NIST, Berkeley, Genova, Cardiff, SRON..)– Nessuno ha un multiplexer funzionante (Array di
SQUID), che comunque sara’ costosissimo.• KID
– Mosaici di Induttanze superconduttrici sensibili alla temperatura (Kinetic Inductance Detectors) o direttamente alle microonde.
– Un solo gruppo (Caltech) sta sviluppando la tecnologia
– Readout in principio semplice, con tecnologie RF da 1GHz (wireless, telefonini)
Kinetic Inductance Detectors (KIDs) for microwaves
• A KID is a strip of superconductor.• The incident radiation with
creates quasiparticles by breaking Cooper pairs. • The increased number of quasiparticles changes the
surface inductance of the superconductor because block the Cooper pairs from occupying some of the electron states (exclusion principle).
• This modifies the effective pairs energy and reduces the density of pairs.
• The change of L is sensed by making the strip part of a microwave resonant circuit, and sensing the change in the phase of a microwave signal transmitted through the resonator.
2h Superconducting gap energy
ckT5.32
data fromDay et al. 2003
120 mK
260 mK
T << TcDensity of states for quasiparticles
hNqp
sss LjRZ
ssqp LRN ,
Mazin (Caltech)
GHz RF (…+fN-1+fN+fN+1+…)
CMB CMB CMB
Pixel N-1fN-1
Pixel NfN
Pixel N+1fN+1
0.3K - 0.1K
RF mux• A KID has high transmission at f away from resonance.
This fact can naturally be used for multiplexing many detectors, tuned at different resonances f, all loading the same transmission line.
• Using excitation in the GHz range:
• high quality wireless components are available
• thousands of detectors can be multiplexed, with a single coax and a single HEMT
More Advantages:• A KID is simple to fabricate (no junctions, nor complex
processes) in e.g. Aluminum (Tc=1K, Top=0.1K), sapphire, silicon: all rugged materials suitable for space environment.
• At Top<<Tc the sensitivity scales as exp(-/kTop)• There is flexibility in the selection of
– Microwave circuit layout (striplines, microstrip lines, coplanar waveguides etc.)
– Superconducting material selection: Aluminum, Tantalum, Niobium, Titanium, Zirconium
– Substrates selection (Ge, Si, Sapphire etc.)
Responsivity• Is the phase change per injected quasiparticle . • It can be computed using the Mattis-Bardeen theory.
• Where is the fraction of the line inductance which is kinetic
• No is the density of single spin electron states at the Fermi energy of the metal (No=1.72x1010 mm3/eV for Al)
• V is the volume of the superconductor
hNqp VNQ
dNd
oqp
total
kin
LL
o
qp
s
s
NN
ZZ
2
Day et al., 2003, Nature, 425 , 817
Mazin (Caltech)
Mazin (Caltech)
Polarization Basics• The equations
represent a pair of plane waves: the two components of the electrical field of an EM wave propagating in the z direction, not necessarily monochromatic.
• The amplitudes Eox,y(t) and phases x,y(t) fluctuate slowly with respect to the rapid oscillation of the carrier cos(t).
)](cos[)()()](cos[)()(
tttEtEtttEtE
yoyy
xoxx
z
Ex
Ey E
Polarization Basics
If we eliminate the term cos(t) between the two equations, and define (t)= y(t)- x(t), we find the polarization ellipse (valid in general at a given time), which is the locus of points described by the optical field as it propagates:
)](cos[)()()](cos[)()(
tttEtEtttEtE
yoyy
xoxx
)(sin)(cos)()()()(2
)()(
)()( 2
2
2
2
2
tttEtEtEtE
tEtE
tEtE
oyoy
yx
oy
y
ox
x
fast fast fast
slow slow slowslow slow
t
)()()( tEtEtE yx
z
Ex
Ey E
Polarization Basics• For purely monochromatic waves, amplitudes and
phases must be constant with time:
And the polarization ellipse is also constant:
]cos[)(]cos[)(
yoyy
xoxx
tEtEtEtE
22
2
2
2
sincos)()(2)()(
oyox
yx
oy
y
ox
x
EEtEtE
EtE
EtE
fast fast fast
t
)()()( tEtEtE yx
z
Ex
Ey E
Polarization Basics
• In general a beam of light is “elliptically polarized”.
• The polarization ellipse degenerates to special forms for special values of the amplitudes and of the phases.
• Linear polarized waves: when the ellipse collapses to a line, i.e. when =0,. The direction of the E vector remains constant.
• Circularily polarized waves: when the ellipse reduces to a circle, i.e. when = and Eox=Eoy=Eo.
E
x
y
E
x
y
E
x
y
Polarization Basics• The polarization ellipse is specified by the amplitude parameters Eox,Eoy,.
• But it can be expressed equivalently by the elliptical parameters:
• Orientation angle :
• Ellipticity angle :
• For linearly polarized light =0.
a
b
x
y’x’
y
22
cos22tan
oyox
oyox
EEEE
ab
tan
22
sin22sin
oyox
oyox
EEEE
Stokes Parameters• Our detectors are too slow to follow the time
evolution of the EM field. What we can measure are time averages, over periods much longer than 2/.
• Due to the periodicity of the EM waves, it is enough to compute time averages over a single period of oscillation. These are represented by the symbol <…>.
• So we take the time average of the polarization ellipse:
22
2
2
2
sincos)()(2)()(
oyox
yx
oy
y
ox
x
EEtEtE
EtE
EtE
Stokes Parameters• Multiplying by 4Eox
2Eoy2 we find
• Since Ex(t) and Ey(t) are sine waves, we can compute their time averages and substitute above:
• Since we want to express this in terms of intensities, we can add and subtract Eox
4+Eoy4:
2
2222
)sin2(cos)()(28
)(4)(4
oyoxyxoyox
yoxxoy
EEtEtEEE
tEEtEE
22
2222
)sin2()cos2(
22
oyoxoyox
oyoxoxoy
EEEE
EEEE
Stokes Parameters
• We find
• We define the Stokes Parameters:
• so that our equation reduces to
22
222222
)sin2()cos2(
)()(
oyoxoyox
oyoxoxoy
EEEE
EEEE
sin2
cos2
3
2
221
22
oyox
oyox
oyox
oxoyo
EES
EES
EES
EES
23
22
21
2 SSSS o
Stokes Parameters• If light is not purely monochromatic,
the amplitudes and phases fluctuate with time.
• It can be shown that, in general,
• The = sign is valid for fully polarized light, while the > sign is valid for partially polarized or unpolarizedlight. P=degree of polarization:
• The intensity is related to So:• The orientation of the polarization
ellipse is related to S1 and S2:• The ellipticity of the polarization
ellipse is related to S3:
23
22
21
2 SSSSo
1
222
cos22tan
SS
EEEE
oyox
oyox
ooyox
oyox
SS
EEEE 3
22
sin22sin
sin2
cos2
3
2
221
22
oyox
oyox
oyox
oxoyo
EES
EES
EES
EES
22oxoyo EES
10
23
22
21
PS
SSSII
Pototal
pol
Stokes Parameters• Note that, for linear polarized
light (=0), both parameters S1and S2 represent the difference in intensity carried by two orthogonal components:
• S1 is the difference in intensity between the components along axis x and y
• S2 is the difference in intensity between the components along two axis x’ and y’ rotated 45o
with respect to x and y.
x
y
x
yy’
x’
221 yx EES
2'
2'''''2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
122 yxyxyxyx EEEEEEEES
Ex
Ey
Ex’
Ey’ 45o
Stokes Parameters: examples• Unpolarized light:
=random<Eox
2>=<Eoy2>=Io
• Linearly polarized light:– Horizontal(Eoy=0) Vertical (Eox=0) +45o (Eoy= Eoy; = 0) o
• Circular polarized light:– Left Right
sin2
cos2
3
2
221
22
oyox
oyox
oyox
oxoyo
EES
EES
EES
EES
0001
2 oIS
0011
oIS
001
1
oIS
0101
oIS
02sin2cos
1
oIS
1001
oIS
1001
oIS
Stokes Parameters• The waves can be represented as complex functions:
• This helps in the time-averaging process needed to compute the Stokes Parameters. They can be rewritten as follows (Stokes vector):
sin2cos2
)(
22
22
**
**
**
**
3
2
1
oyox
oyox
oyox
oyox
xyyx
xyyx
yyxx
yyxxo
EEEE
EEEE
EEEEiEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSS
)](exp[]cos[)()](exp[]cos[)(
yoyyoyy
xoxxoxx
tiEtEtEtiEtEtE
Stokes Parameters• The Stokes vector can also be expressed in terms of
So, , . • From
• And from
• Using we find S1, so we have:
2sin2sin2cos2cos2cos
1
3
2
1o
o
S
SSSS
2tan can write wecos2
2tan 1222 SSEE
EE
oyox
oyox
2sin can write wesin2
2sin 322 ooyox
oyox SSEE
EE
23
22
21
2 SSSS o Poincare’
Classical measurement of the Stokes Parameters
• The measurement of the 4 Stokes Parameters needs two optical components:– A retarder (wave plate): it is a phase-shifting element, whose
effect is to advance the phase of the x component by and to retard the phase of the y component by - . So the field emerging from the retarder is E’x= Ex ei and E’y= Ey e-i
– A polarizer. The optical field can pass only along one axis, the transmission axis. So the total field emerging from the polarizer is E”=E’xcos+E’ysin, where E’ is the incident field and is the angle of the transmission axis.
• So the beam arriving on the detector is E”=Ex ei cos+Eye-i sin
source retarder polarizer
detector
Classical measurement of the Stokes Parameters
• E”=Ex ei cos+Eye-i sin• The detector measures its intensity, i.e. I= E”E”*• So we get
• Which can be rewritten using the half-angle formulas:
source retarder polarizer
detector
cossincossin
sincos),(**
2*2*
iyx
iyx
yyxx
eEEeEE
EEEEI
2sinsin2sincos
2cos),(
****
****
21
xyyxxyyx
yyxxyyxx
EEEEiEEEE
EEEEEEEEI
22sin
22cos12
22cos12 cossin sin cos
2sinsin2sincos2cos),( 32121 SSSSI o
Classical measurement of the Stokes Parameters
• This is the formula derived in 1852 by Sir George Gabriel Stokes.
• The first three parameters can be measured by removing the retarder (=0) and measuring the intensity with three orientations of the polarizer =0o,45o,90o:
• The fourth parameter can be measured by inserting a 90o retarder (quarter wave plate):
source retarder polarizer
detector 2sinsin2sincos2cos),( 3212
1 SSSSI o
321
121
221
121
)90,45()0,90()0,45()0,0(
SSISSISSISSI
ooo
ooo
ooo
ooo
)0,90()0,0()90,45(2)0,90()0,0()0,45(2
)0,90()0,0()0,90()0,0(
3
2
1
oooooo
oooooo
oooo
ooooo
IIISIIIS
IISIIS
Classical measurement of the Stokes Parameters
• The great advantage of the Stokes Parameters is that they are observable. The polarization ellipse is not (too fast).
• Moreover, the Stokes parameters can be used to describe unpolarized light: light which is not affected by the rotation of a polarized or by the presence of a retarder. Stokes was the first one to describe mathematically unpolarized and partially polarized light.
• It is evident from Stokes formula that, for unpolarized light, S1=S2=S3=0, while So>0.
• The fully polarized light had • The intermediate state is partially polarized light, where
source retarder polarizer
detector 2sinsin2sincos2cos),( 3212
1 SSSSI o
23
22
21
2 SSSSo
23
22
21
2 SSSSo
Partially polarized light• The Stokes parameters of a combination of independent
waves are the sums of the respective Stokes parameters of the separate waves.
• If we combine a fully polarized wave with an independent, unpolarized one, we find partially polarized light.
• This expression will be useful in the following.
10 23
22
21
P
SSSS
II
Pototal
pol
3
2
1
3
2
1
000
)1(
SSSS
P
S
P
SSSS
S
ooo
Polarization-active optical components
• When a beam of light interacts with matter its polarization state is almost always changed.
• It can be changed by– changing the amplitudes– changing the phases– changing the directions
of the orthogonal field components.• Their effect can be described by means of the
Mueller matrices: M is a 4x4 matrix such that the emerging Stokes vector is S’=M S .
Polarizer (Diattenuator)
RotatorWave-plate (Retarder)
1) Polarizer or Diattenuator• It attenuates the orthogonal
components of an optical beam unequally:
• Using the definitions of S and S’
• And inserting the expressions for E’we get
yyy
xxx
EpEEpE
'
'
)( '*''*'
'*''*'
'*''*'
'*''*'
'3
'2
'1
'
xyyx
xyyx
yyxx
yyxxo
EEEEiEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSS
)( **
**
**
**
3
2
1
xyyx
xyyx
yyxx
yyxxo
EEEEiEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSS
3
2
12222
2222
'3
'2
'1
'
200002000000
21
SSSS
pppp
pppppppp
SSSS o
yx
yx
yxyx
yxyxo
Special cases
• If the diattenuator is simply an attenuator, i.e. if px=py=p we have a neutral density filter:
• If the Polarizer is ideal and horizontal, i.e. if py=0 we have
• If the Polarizer is ideal and vertical, i.e. if px=0 we have
3
2
12
'3
'2
'1
'
1000010000100001
SSSS
p
SSSS oo
3
2
12
'3
'2
'1
'
0000000000110011
2SSSS
p
SSSS o
x
o
3
2
12222
2222
'3
'2
'1
'
200002000000
21
SSSS
pppp
pppppppp
SSSS o
yx
yx
yxyx
yxyxo
3
2
12
'3
'2
'1
'
0000000000110011
2SSSS
p
SSSS o
y
o
Polarizer:• The characteristics of
the polarizer px and pycan be rewritten in terms of new parameters p and :
• With these parameters the Mueller matrix of a polarizer is:
• An ideal polarizer converts any incoming beam into a linearly polarized beam:
yx
yx
yxyx
yxyx
P
pppp
pppppppp
M
200002000000
21 2222
2222
sincos
pppp
defy
defx
2sin00002sin000012cos002cos1
2
2pMP
001
1
21
0000000000110011
21
1
3
2
1
'3
'2
'1
'
SS
SSSS
SSSS
o
oo
2) Retarder• It introduces a phase shift between
the orthogonal components of an optical beam :
• Using the definitions of S and S’
• And inserting the expressions for E’we get
)()()()(
2/'
2/'
tEetEtEetE
yi
y
xi
x
)( '*''*'
'*''*'
'*''*'
'*''*'
'3
'2
'1
'
xyyx
xyyx
yyxx
yyxxo
EEEEiEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSS
)( **
**
**
**
3
2
1
xyyx
xyyx
yyxx
yyxxo
EEEEiEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSS
3
2
1
'3
'2
'1
'
cossin00sincos00
00100001
SSSS
SSSS oo
Special cases
• If the retarder is a quarter-wave plate (=90o):
• Such a retarder converts a +45o linearly polarized beam into a right/left circularly polarized beam:
• If the retarder is a half-wave plate (=180o):
• This reverses the ellipticity and orientation of the incomin polarization state.
3
2
1
'3
'2
'1
'
cossin00sincos0000100001
SSSS
SSSS oo
3
2
1
'3
'2
'1
'
01001000
00100001
SSSS
SSSS oo
01
01
01001000
00100001
1001
3
2
1
'3
'2
'1
'
1000010000100001
SSSS
SSSS oo
3) Rotator• Here
• Using the definitions of S and S’
• And inserting the expressions for E’we get
cos)(sin)()(sin)(cos)()(
'
'
tEtEtEtEtEtE
yxy
yxx
)( '*''*'
'*''*'
'*''*'
'*''*'
'3
'2
'1
'
xyyx
xyyx
yyxx
yyxxo
EEEEiEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSS
)( **
**
**
**
3
2
1
xyyx
xyyx
yyxx
yyxxo
EEEEiEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSS
3
2
1
'3
'2
'1
'
100002cos2sin002sin2cos00001
SSSS
SSSS oo
Rotated Optical Components• We have assumed that the optical axis of the components we
have considered were aligned to the coordinate system.• If they are not (as often happens), we have to
1. rotate the incident beam from the original coordinate system to the one aligned with the component: S’ = MR ()Sin
2. Multiply S’ by the Mueller matrix MC of the optical component S”= MCS’
3. Rotate the output beam back into the original coordinate system: Sout= MR (-) S’’
• So we have:Sout = MR (-) MC MR () SinWhere is the rotation on the optical component C.
100000000001
100002cos2sin002sin2cos00001
)(22
22
cssc
MdefR
Rotated Polarizer
100000000001
0000000000
100000000001
21)(
22
22
22
22
cssc
XXcs
scMP
• Here
• so
• and
XX
pppp
pppppppp
MMdef
yx
yx
yxyx
yxyx
PC
0000000000
21
200002000000
21)0()0(
2222
2222
XXcsXcssXcsXscc
sc
MP
0000)(0)(0
21)( 2
222222
2222
222
22
2cos2sin
2
2
2
22
22
cs
ppXpppp
yx
yx
yx
Linear Polarimeter
• A polarimeter is a device able to detect polarized light and measure its polarization characteristics.
• The simplest polarimeter we can imagine is a linear polarimeter, which can be built with a rotating polarizer in front of an intensity detector.
• An intensity detector is represented by a Stokes vector D=(1,0,0,0). The power detected by the detector from an optical beam with Stokes vector S is simply w=DS=So
• If we put a polarizer in front of the detector, the polarizer is called analyzer, and the power detected will be w() =DMP()S
source polarizer
Intensity detector
Linear Polarimeter
source Polarizer (analyzer)
Intensity detector
0000)(0)(0
21)0,0,0,1()(
3
2
122
22222
2222
222
22
SSSS
XXcsXcssXcsXscc
sc
SDMw
o
P
2sin2cos 2121 SSSw o
This polarimeter is not sensitive to circular polarization (no S3).It is sensitive to linear polarization (S1 and S2) and to unpolarized light (So). If the polarizer is ideal:
2sin2cos0X ; 1 ; 1
2121 SSSw o
Linear Polarimeter
source Rotating analyzer
Intensity detector
• If we are interested to the linear polarized component only, we can rotate continuously the polarizer: =t and look only for the AC signal at frequency 2.
• This allows to reject the unpolarized component, even if it is dominant, and to remove all the noise components at frequencies different than 2 (synchronous demodulation).
tStSSw o 2sin2cos 2121
)(2sin2cos)()()( 2121 tNtStSSRtNtRwtV o
constantsignal (DC)
modulatedsignal (AC)
noise(AC)detector
responsivity
Linear Polarimeter
source Rotating analyzer
x
Rw+N
A(Rw+N)
C
RAC
Ref(2)
A[Rw(2)+N()]Demodulated signal
Log P()
Log
P( ) d
2
-
-=1/T
1/RC
signalnoise
<…>T
Detector
How do we separate S1 and S2
• Neglecting the stochastic effect of noise (we integrate enough that N becomes negligible) and of the constant term (which we remove with the AC decoupling)
• We measure V and we want to estimate S1 and S2. We can use two reference signals, out of phase by T/8 and synchronously demodulate with them:
tStSRtRwtV 2sin2cos)()( 2121
)(2sin2cos)()()( 2121 tNtStSSRtNtRwtV o
How do we separate S1 and S2
TT
TR
T
T
TT
TR
T
T
tdttStdttStdttVY
tdttStdttStdttVX
02
012
1
0
1
02
012
1
0
1
2cos2sin2cos2cos2cos)(
2sin2sin2sin2cos2sin)(
181
281
SRYSRX
• So the double linear polarimeter is
insensitive to So and it is easy to calibrate.
• Is this a troubleless instrument ? No !• It is inefficient (factor 1/8 from
modulation and demodulation)• It can be microphonic.• And, as all polarimeters, needs a
telescope.