Vinda P. Valandini – 121211233009

1. In binary antonyms if one is true other must be false, and vice versa. It has all-or-nothing

to deny one part of the pair is equivalent to affirming the other. Example between true

and false. Jack’s answer is true as (P) and Jack’s answer is wrong is (Q). P ↔ ~Q /

~P→Q. So if Jack’s answer is true it means that his answer is not wrong, and if his

answer is not true thus become wrong. Non-binary antonyms are those that have

variability and degrees between oppositional antonyms. Examples: I may be old, older or

oldest. I may be young, younger or not so young. Young/old is gradable antonyms and

therefore non-binary antonyms, not having two exclusive parts.

2. Converse requires two arguments, theme and associate. Those two are needed to be of

about the same size, or importance. From theme and associate led to the more complex

part, effect and affect. Through them there is a converse sentence in which the original

object can turn into subject, the verb change into passive, and also deletion of agent.

Example: a) Adi repair the car. Can change into b) the car was repaired (by Adi).

3. Symmetrical principle is a single term of converness. It means that it also be participles

formed from causative and adjective combined with preposition such with, from, or to.

Example: Reifan’s grammar book has the same color as his Frech dictionary. If the

sentence restate into Reifan’s grammar book and French dictionary have the same color,

doesn’t change the meaning of sentence. Only change the structure of sentence. In

reciprocal predicates is a bout the verb from converness sentence. Example: Tom agreed

with Karin, if the sentence change into Tom and Karin agreed. The sentence will be

ambiguous because of structural changes have an impact on change in meaning.

4. In example number 35-38a those sentences have predicates as their symmetrical

predicates but if examined deeper they did not because they change (numbers 35-38

emulated b) actually make sense of the sentence becomes ambiguous. Therefore

ambiguous so as not to need a replacement sign on the example 35-38b. Example: Tom

and Ann agreed with me. So the sentence could be clearer.

5. Example number 40 presented because it will provide an overview or in-depth

explanation of the 'no-some-few-many' (especially for no) where people are far less

precise in understanding and using it. The examples are so clear in describing. From dogs

to the more obvious that becomes collies and cats turn into more specific, angoras.