Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LEViS ~
AvA
94.
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY 10....Department of Civil Engineering
Lu1
DI STMIUTION SWTk.r1r!EApproved for pO
STRUCTURES AND MECHANICS
35
Technical RepNo 5ICivil Engng. Res. Rep 78-SM-B
.
(,, LINE CRACK SUBJECT TONTIPLANE SHEAR ~
Princeton University
Researoh Sponsored by theoff ice of Naval Research
under
Modification No. P00002
C-
July 1.978
SApproved for public release; Distribution Unlimited
A471FICATIaN .. . .. .. ...............
. . . .................. EP 26 1978j.. .. .... ... .. .. .... .... ..
0UiLLUI
LINE CRACK SUBJECT TO
ANTIPLANE SHEAR 1
A. Cemal EringenPrinceton University
/II
ABSTRACT (Field equations of nonlocal elasticity are solved to determinethe state of stress in a plate with a line crack subject to aconstant anti-plane shear. Contrary to the classical elasticitysolution, it is found that no stress singularity is present atthe crack tip. By equating the maximum shear stress that occursat the crack tip to the shear stress that is necessary to breakthe atomic bonds,the critical value of the applied shear isobtained for the initiation of fracture. If the concept ofthe surface tension is usedone is able to calculate thecohesive stress for brittle materials.
1. INTRODUCTION
In several previous papers 1i] - [4] we discussed the state of
stress near the tip of a sharp line crack in an elastic plate subject to
uniform tension and in-plane shear. The field equations employed in the
solution of these problems are those of the theory of nonlocal elasticity.
The solutions obtained did not contain any stress singularity, thus
resolving a fundamental problem that persisted over half a century. This
enabled us to employ the maximum-stress hypothesis to deal with fracture
L problems in a natural way. Moreover it has been possible to predict
the atomic cohesive stresses by introducing the experimental values
of the surface energy.
iThe present work was supported by the Office of Naval Research
The present paper deals with the problem of a line crack in an elastic
plate where the crack surface is subject to a uniform anti-plane shear
load. This problem, classically, is known as the Mode III displacement.
We employ the field equations of nonlocal elasticity theory to formulate
and solve this problem. The solution, as expected, does not contain the
stress singularity at the crack tip and therefore a fracture criterion
based on the maximum shear stress hypothesis can be used to obtain the
critical value of the applied shear for which the line crack begins to
become unstable. If the concept of the surface energy is introduced, it
is possible to calculate the cohesive stress holding the atomic bonds
together. Estimates of cohesive stress are also given for perfect
crystalline solids.
In section 2 we present a resume of basic equations of linear non-
local elastic solids. In section 3 the boundary-value problem is form-
ulated, and the general solution is obtained. in section 4 we give the
solution of the dual integral equations, completing the solution. Cal-
culat:rons for the shear stress are carried out in a computer, and the
results are discussed in section 5.
2. BASIC EQUATIONS OR NONLOCAL ELASTICITY
Basic equations of linear, homogeneous, isotropic, nonlocal elastic
solids, with vanishing body and inerti.a forces, are (cf. [5]):
(2.1) tk 0
(2.2) t [X'(Ix'-xl)e r X +2p'(ix -xl)e (x')ldv(x')
V
(2.3) ekZ = k, +u Z, k
where the only difference from classical elasticity is in the stress
constitutive equations (2.2) in which the stress tk (x) at a point xdepends on the strains ek(x'), at all points of the body. For homo-
geneous and isotropic solids there exist only two material moduli,
X'(Ix'-xl) and 1i'(jx'-xj) which are functions of the distance I-xl.
The integral in (2.2) is over the volume V of the body enclosed within
a surface 3V. 4Throughout this paper we employ cartesian coordinates xk with the
usual convention that a free index takes the values (1, 2, 3), and repeated
indices are summed over the range (1, 2, 3). Indices following a comma
represent partial differentiation, e.g.
Uk, 9, k zU/X
In our previous work [6, 7] we obtained the forms of o'(ix ssXl)
and p'(Ix-xI) for which the dispersion curves of plane elastic waves
coincide with those known in lattice dynamics. Among several possible
curves the following has been found very useiul
0"" (X'1j)a(fx-xI)
(2. 4)
a(lx-xl)= a exp[- ($/a)2 (x'-x)-(x'-x)] ,
where S is a constant, a is the lattice parameter, and a0 is determined
by the normalization
(2.5) f c(Ix'-xl)dv(x') 1
V
"•,1
•' :,•_ •,:! ,,.•• ,' ,•,'',,'" ,..',• , ••: , •: ••,• •' ' '• ' • ',J• ... -• •,- , : 'Z:• • • •: ````I `I ••.•• •`::• `` :L•` `.• ...- ,.-;,':;-•• : ,'-'. '- '•' '•': '
-4-
In the preseat work we employ the nonlocal elastic moduli given
by (2.4)2. Carryin- (2.4)2 into (2.5) we obtain
(2.6) 0/ (fla)2.
Substituting (2.4)1 into (2.2) we write
(2.7) tk (x) dv(x') ,JZ a(1x.tY'-x)OkV
where
(2.8) aki (x') e , e x) 6ki + 2Vl ek£ (x')
SUr,r (x) Sk +)j [Uk, (xt) + uk (x')]
is the classical Hooke's law. Substituting (2.8) into (2.1) and using
Green-Gauss theorem we obtain:
(2.9) W a(jx-xf) 0ktk (x') dv (x') - a(Ix'-xI) "kL (x')dakIx')= 0-
The contribution to the surface integral from the parts of the
surface at infinity would be dropped since the displacem2nt field
vanishes' at infinity.
- ~ -
-5-
3. CRACK UNDER ANTI-PLANE SHEAR
We consider an elastic plate in the (Xl-x, x2 -Y) - plane weakened
by a line crack of length 2Z along the x-axis. The plate is subjected
to a constant anti-plane shear stress tyz-T along the surfaces of the
crack, Fig. 1. For this problem we have
(3.1) u 1-u 2-O , u3 "w(y,y),
(3.2) ax-" x ay w , all other OkaUO 0
so that the only surviving member of the field equations (2.9) is
(3.3) a(Ix'-xIIy'-yl)V' 2w(x',y')dx'dy'- (xtO)]dx'mO
where the integral with a slash is over the two-dimensional infinite
space excluding the line of the crack (I xl <k, y-0). A boldface bracket
indicates a Jumip at the crack line.
When an undeformed and unstressed body is sliced to create a free
surface, it will in general be deformed and stressed on account of the
long-range interatomic forces. Thus if we are to consider that the
plate with a crack is undeformed and unstressed in its natural state
then we must apply the boundary conditions on the unopened crack surfac,.
Under the applied anti-plane shear load on the unopened surfaces
of the crack,the displacement field possesses the following symmetry
regulations
(3.4) w(x,-y) - -i(x,y, •
I I~ I I I.. F>
-6-
Using this in (3.2) we find that
(3.5) [a (x,O)] - 0-yz
Hence the line integral in (3.3) vanishes. By ta'ting the Fourier
transform of (3.3) with respect to x', we can show that the general
solution of (3.3) is identical to that of
d2- 2-y)
(3.6) w2 .-•(C ,y)_0dy
almost everywhere. Here a superposed bar indicates the Fourier
transform e.g.
Sf(•,y) ff(xy) exp (i~x) dx
The boundary conditions are
w(x,o) - 0 for jxI>t
(3.7) t (X,O) - T for Ix1< ,
"W(X,y) - 0 as (x 2+y2)1/2..-.D
The general solution of (3.6) (for yj0) satisfying (3,7)3 is
(3.8) v(x~y) - (2/w)*f A(Q) eEY coo (Ex) twdonay odtos
where A) is to be determined from the remaining two boundary conditions.
For the non-zero components of the stress tensor we have
iI
-7-1
( .) t ~ -- (2/7w ) ji vf 'A( &) 4d & Icy ~ x -l 'y -l
yz
+-a(xIx-xIIy'+yI)] e- coo (tx') dx'.
Using (2.4) for C6 1x'x), we carry out integrations on x' and y'. To2 -
this end we note the following integral&, [8]:
I L e- r~ (-I) t2) ain&(x '+x)l x TP ex -~~ 2/AP) fsin(Cx)F P cos&(x +x) (Cos (&x)
~0
O(z) 2ffir* 2 t
Hence
-(27r 11 &A(&% [e erfctibZ - e~y erfc uuin(&x)d&
oz 2 r 2/
(3.11) --( F&() e& erfc( + et'erf c /?0 o&x)d&
p (0/a) 2 , erfc(z) -1- O(z).
The boundery conditions (.)and (37 now read1 2
I
fC(4) K(cz) cos(zý) dr. -(n/2 T O T0 O ,0o
(3.12) 1-½C(M) cos(zW) dU - 0 z>l
where we set
z = x IC , 1 - . , c - a/23i ,
(3.13) K(cW) * erfc (W)
A()T -T oT2 1
To determine the unknown function A(M), we must solve the dual integral
equations (3.12).
4. THE SOLUTION OF THE DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS
Recalling the eApresaion
cos (zO) - (wz;/2)i J. (zr),
where J (z) is the Bessel function of order v, we write the system
(3.12) in the form
C1 -T z-i O<z<l
I ~(4.1) ;C(1) J)i (z4) d; 0 z>l
- To
-9-
The kernel function k(cC) is given by
(4.2) k(c;) - K(cC) -1 - (cC)
The solution of the dual integral equations (4.1) is not known. However,
it is possible to reduce the problem to the solution of a Fredholm
equation (cf. [91)
1
(4.3) h(x) + o h(u)L(x,u)du - -4(wx)IT°
for the function h(x), where
(4.4) L(x,u) - (xu)4Ftk(ct)Jo(xt)Jo(ut)dt
When (4.3) is solved, then C(;) is calculated by
(4.5) C(W) - (2C) JxjJ 0 (Wx) h(x) dxfI
As discussed in a previous work [4], if we note that E is extremely small,
k(ec) may be neglected an compared to unity in (4.1), (see Fig. 2). In
this case the zeroth order soluticn of (4.3) namely h (x) - -To0 (x)f/2
suffices for the calculations when the crack size is larger than 100 atomic
distances. In such a case we have
(4.6) Co (C) N -(r/2)4ToC-•rJ() 1
-10-
and therefore
(4.7) A 0 -((/2)To0Ji(M)/
The shear stresses are then calculated by (3.11). Interesting among
these is the shear stress t along the crack line y - 0. For thisyz
we obtain
(4.8) ty (Z,O)IT° - K() Jl(0) cos(z;) dý
As observed before, this integral converges for all z provided K(c;)
is not approximated by unity for c small. For c - 0 at z 1 1 we have
the classical stress singularity. However, so long as E 0, (4.8)
gives a finite stress all along y - 0. At O<z<l, t z/T0 is very close
to unity, and for z>l, t /T possesses finite values diminishing from ayz o
maximum value at z=1 to zero at z=-.
For c>>1/100 the approximate solution given by (4.7) is not very
good. However, further improvements can be achieved by the iterative
solution of (4.3) with the use of Co(). Since c>1/100 represents a
crack length of less than 10- 6 cm, and at such submicroscopic sizes other
serious questions arise regarding the interatomic arrangements and force
laws, we do not pursue solutions valid at such small crack sizes.
5. NUMERICAL CALCULATIONS AND DISCUSSION.
Calculations of the shear stress t , given by (4.8) along the crack
line, were carried out on a computer. The results are plotted for c - 1/20,
1/50, 1/100, 1/200, in Figures 3 to 6. For a crack length of 20 atomic
distances (c 1/20) the result is not very good in that the boundary
-11-
condition at Ixl<Z, y - 0 is satisfied only very roughly. However, for a
crack size of 100 atomic distances (Fig. 5) the shear streas boundary
condition io fulfilled in a strong approximate sense. The relative error
in this case is less than 110/o. Hence we conclude that the classical
Ao(t) given by (4.7) gives satisfactory results for crdck lengghs
greater than 100 atomic distances.
The stress concentration occurs at the crack tip, and this is given by
(5.1) tyz (,0)/t° = 31re , e a/20t
where c 3 converges to about
(5.2) c3 0.4
The following observations are very significant:
(i) The maximum shear stress occurs at the crack tip, and it is
finite \eq. 5.1)
(ii) The shear stress at the crack tip becomes infinite as the atomic
distance a-0. This is the classical continuum limit of square
root singularity.
(iii) When tyz(Z,0) - tc ( - cohesive shear stress), the plate will fail.
In this case
2(5.3) -E CQ03 G
where
(5.4) CG (a/26c 3 t 2
G .3 c
- j
Equation (5.3) is the Expression of the Griffith -racture criterion
for brittle fracture. We have arrived at this result via the maximum
shear-stress hypothesis, rather than the surface energy concept used
by Griffith and his followers. The sigrificance of this result is that
the fracture criteria are unified at both the macroscopic and zhe
microscopic scales and that the natural concept of bond failure is
employed.
(iv) The cohesive shear stress tc may be estimated if one employs
the Griffith's definition of the surface energy y and writes
2-(5.5) t a-K yc c
where
2(5.6) K 8pc
c 3
Since some measurements exist on y, by employing these values we
can calculate the cohesive shear stress. For steel we have
Y =1975 CGS , P=6.92 x 1O CGS
S= 0.291 , a =2.48 A0
(5.7) t /i = 0.2568 a1/2C
-13-
Let at a n atomic distance the nonlocal effects attenuate to T% of its
value at x=O. Using (2.4) we find that
(5.8) = 2.1•6/n
(5.9) tc /I = 0.3764 n-1/2
For n 6 this gives
(5.10) tc/P = o.14
which is in the right range and well accepted by metallurgists. For
example Kelly [10] gives t /P = 0.11. There is however a question ofC
in-plane versus antiplane shear failure which need special examination.
Compared to the results obtained in our previous work on the in-plane
shear [4), the cohesive stress seems 30% higher. However, this is somewhat
artificial since it is necessary to know the value of $ or n in either
case more precisely. This of course requires at least one experiment.
Acknowledgement: The author is indebted to Dr. Balta for carrying out
computations.
?II
REFERENCES
[1] A. C. Eringen and B. S. Kim, "Stress Concentration at theTip of' Crack," Mech. Res. Comm. 1, 233-237, 197h.
[2] A. C. Eringen, "State of Stress in the Neighborhood of aSharp Crack Tip," Trans. of' the twenty-second conferenceof Army mathematicians, 1-18, 1977.
[3] A. C. Eringen, C. G. Speziale and B. S. Kim, "Crack TipProblem in Nonlocal Elasticity", J. Mech. and Phys. ofSolids, 25, 339-355, 1977.
[4) A. C. Eringen, "Line Crack Subject to Shear", to appear inInt. J. Fracture.
[5) A. C. Eringen, "Linear Theory of Nonlocal Elasticity andDispersion of Plane Waves", Int. J. Enpng. Sci. 10, 233-248, 1972.
[61 A. C. Eringen, "Nonlocal Elasticity and Waves," ContinuumMechanics Aspects of Geodynamics and Rock Fracture Mechanics,(,e•d. P. Thoft-Christensen) Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel
Publishing Co., pp. 81-105, 197h
17] A. C. Eringen, "Continuum Mechanics at the Atomic Scale",Cryst. Lattice Defects, 7, Do. 109-130, 1977.
18] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. W. Rhyzhik, "Tables of Integrals,Series and Products", New York; Acad. Press, 1965, pp. I480, 307, 338. •
[9] I.N. Sneddon, "Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Potential Theory",North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterd !1, 1966, pn. 106-108.
I[10] A. Kelley, "Strong Solids", Oxford, iCK6, p. 19.
I.I
SI
x
000 000-
TO
I
LINE CRACK SUBJECT TO ANTIPLANE SHEAR
FIGURE I
r I
If:
UL.
0.8-
0.6-
.0.4-
0.2-
00 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
I, ~KERNEL FUNCTION Met)I
FIGURE 2
I
1.0
0.5-
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 x/f0 T . . i, -••-
-0.5-
-I.0-
-1.5-E=1/20
-2.0-
•. -2.5"1
-3.0-
-3.5
-4.0-
-4.5-
-5.0 -
-5.5
1
ANTIPLANE SHEAR STRESS
FIGURE 3
I2
1.0
__ __ _ 0.5 _ __ _ 1.0 1.5 2.0 x/d
Eu 1/50
4-40
-4-5
ANTIPLANE SHEAR STRESS
FIGURE 4
1.0
0.5__1.0_1.5 2.0 x/dl
00
0.5
4-,Nlo
-2.0IANIPAE HERSTES
FIGURE
-3.7]
1.0
0.5-
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 X/.
-0.5-
-I.0-
-I.5
E 1/200-2.0-
,o-2.5-N
-3.0-
-3.5-
-4.0
-4.5 -
-5.0-
-5.5-
ANTIPLANE SHEAR STRESS
FIGURE 6
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE ("an.. Data Entered) __________________
REPOT DCUMNTATON AGEREAD INSTRUCTIONSREPOT DCUMNTATON AGEBEFORE COMPLETINGO FORM
IREPORT NUMBER GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER
Princeton Technical Rev'. 53
4 TITLE (and SubtfIt..) S. TYPE OF REPORT A PERIOD COVERED
Line Crack Subject to Antiplane Shear TcnclRpr
S. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER
7. AUTHOR(#) I. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER(#)
A. Cemal Eringen N00014-76-C-0240
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASKAREA A WORK UNIT NUMBERS
Princeton University P00Princeton, NJ 08540
1I CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. RPORT0 OATSOffice of Naval Research (Code 471) July, 1978Arlington, VA 22217 IS. NUMBEROF PAGES
14 Pages149 MONITORING AGENCY NAME A ADORESS(II different from Cont,.IIini Office) 15. SECURITY CLASS. (of this report)
Unclassified
Me,. DIECL ASSI roCATION/ DOWN ONAIDINGSCNEDULE
I6 DISTHISUTION STATEMENT (of this Report)
Approved for public release; Distribution Unlimited
17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (oftheA abstract oneiiedin Block 30, It different frw Repve!
It, SUPPLIEMIENTANY NOTES
It. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse aid@ li~nocoamy onE identify by~ block numbot)
fracture mechanics, line crack, antiplane shear, nonlocal theory,crack tin problems, cohesive stress
20 AUSTR4ACT (Continuean revrs s~O*id.i ecam Edwiibp&.Aub)Field equations of nonlocal elasticity are solved to determine the state
of stress in a olate with a line crack sublect to a constant anti-plane shear.Contrary to the classical elasticity solution, it is found that no stresssingularity is present at the crack tip. By equatinq the maximium shearstress that occurs at the crack tip to the shear stress that is necessaryto break the Atomvic ) 'nds, the cr .'cal value of the applied shear is
obtained for the mui ition -)f fi ure. If the concept of the surfacetension is used, one is able to c,.- iilate the coh-e~eMre-i.ý- for brilýttle
DD I JOAN"73 1473 EDITION Of INOV 95 16 ONSOLu materials.SERCUIRITY CLASSIFICATIONOTISPE(IA.Daauta)
"PART 1 GOVERNMENT Commanding OfficerAdministrative & Liaison Activitie% AX'MR-ATL
__ ...... Attn: Mr, K. SheaChief of Naval Research -U.S. Army Materials Res. AgencyDepartment of the Navy R Watertown, Massachusetts 02172
Arlt,,gon, Virginia 22217 katerviet ArsenalI" Attn: Codi. 474 (2) iaevttAeaAn o 471 MAGGS Research Center222 Watervllet, New York 12189
"222 Attn: Director of ResearchDirectorONR Branch Office Technical Library495 Sumier StreetBoston, Massachusetts 02210
|jDirector Redstone Scientific Info. CenterONR Branch Office Chief, Document Section219 S. Dearborn Street U.S. Army Missile CommandChicago, Illinois 60604 Redstone Arsenal, Alabana 35809
I Army R&D CenterFort Belvoir, Virginia 22060
¶ U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Commanding Officer and DirectorAttn: Code 2627 Naval Ship Research & Development CenterWashington, D.C. 20390 Bethesda, Maryland 20034
Attn: Code 042 Tech. Lib. Br.)Director 17 (Struc. Mech. Lab.)SONR - New York Area Office 172
715 Broadway . 5th Floor 172ORNew York, N.Y. 10003 174177
Director 1800 (Appl. Math. Lab.)ONR Branch Office 5412S (Dr. N.D. Sette)1030 E. Green Street 19 Dr. M... Sevik)Pasadena, California 91101 190! M. Strassberg)
1945Defense Documentation Center 196 .(Dr. O Fett)Cameron Station 1962Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (12) Naval Weapons Laboratory
U.S. Aeaearc LaboratoryAmy ODahlgren, Virginia 22448
Commanding Officer Naval Research Laboratory
U.S. Amy Research Office Durham Washington, D.C. 20375Attn: Mr. J. J. Murray Attn*. Code 8400CRD-AA-IP 8410
' Box CM, Duke Station 8430Durham, North Carolina 27706 2. 8440
630063906380
Undersea EYplosion Research Div. Chief of Naval OperationsNaval Ship R&D Center Dept. of the NavyNorfolk Naval Shipyard Washington, D.C. 20350Portsmouth, Virginia 23709 Attn: Code OpOTTAttn: Dr. E. Palmer
Code 780 Strategic Systems Project OfficeDepartment of the Navy
Naval Ship Research & Development Center Washington, D.C. 20390Annapolis Division Attn: NSP-001 Chief ScientistAnnapolis, Maryland 21402
Attn: Code 2740 - Dr. Y.F. Wang Deep Submergence Systems28 - Mr. R.J. Wolfe Naval Ship Systems Command
281 - Mr. R.B. Niederberger Code 395222814 - Dr. H. Vanderveldt Department of the Navy
Washington, D.C. 20360
Technical Library Engineering Dept.Naval Underwater Weapons Center U.S. Naval AcademyPasadena Annex Annapolis, Maryland 214023202 E. Foothill Blvd.
Pasadena, California 91107 Naval Air Systems Cort'VndDept. of the Navy
U.S. Naval Weapons Center Washington, D.C. 20360China Lake, California 93557 Attn: NAVAIR 5302 Aero 9 StructuAittn: Code 4062 - Mr. W. Wetback 6308 Struct-ures
•4520 -,Mr. Ken Bischel 52031F Materials
Thc604 Tech. LibraryCommaningOficer37,05-Structures
U.S.Command i l Ofcr DirectorN Aero MechanicsCode Nvl31 vl nr.Lb Naval Air Development Center
S lr Sprn g, MaC ryl a 9 DohnsvCllePWarmnster, Pennsylvania 1897t
Technical Director Technical Director,U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory U.S. Naval Undersea R&D CenterWhite Oak San Diego. California 92132Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 .
TechicalDiretorEngineering Department
Naval Undersea R&D Center U..Nnavals Acadeyln 10
San Diego, California 92132 Annapolis, Maryland 21402
Supervisor of Shipbuilding Naval Facilities Engineering Comma
U.S. Navy Dept. of the Navy
Newport News, Virginia 23607 Washington, D.C. 20360Attn: NAVFAC 03 Research & Devel
Technical Director 04 " " me
Mare Island Naval Shipyard 14114 Tech. LibraryVallejo, California 94592
Naval Sea Systems CommandU.S. Navy Underwater Sound Ref. Lab. Dept. of the NavyS Office of Naval Research Washington, D.C. 20360P.O. Box 8337 Attn: NAVSHIP 03 Res. & TechnologOrlando, Florida 32806 031 Ch. Scientist fol
03412 Hydro"'echanics
r. 7 ý," i -r . -7 .1 .. .
"Naval Ship Engineering Center Other overn-mntAc-tilit'ti•.Prince George's PlazaHlyaittsville, Maryland 20782 CommandantAttn: NAVSEC 6100 Ship Sys Enqr A Des Dep Chief. Testing & Development Div.
6102C Computer-Aided Ship Des U.S. Coast Guard6105G 1300 E. Street, Il.W.6110 Ship Concept Design WJashington, V.C. 202266120 Hull Div.61200 Hull Dlv. Technical Director612B Surface Ship Struct. Marine Corps Dev. & Educ. Cornand6i'9 Submarine Struct. Quantico, Virginia 22134
Air Force DirectorNational Bureau of Standards
Commander WADD Washington, D.C. 20234Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Attn: Mr. B.L. Wilson, EM P19Dayton, Ohio 45433Attn: Code WWRMDD Dr. M. Gaus
AFFDL (FDDS) National Science FounuatlonStructures Division Engineering DivisionAFLC (MCEEA) Washington, D.C. 20550
Chief, Applied Mechanics Group Science & Tech. DivisionU.S. Air Force Inst. of Tech. Library of CongressWright-Patterson Air Force Base Washington, D.C. 20540Dayton, Ohio 45433
DirectorChief. Civil Engineering Branch Defense Nuclear AgencyWLRC, Research Division Washington, D.C. 20305Air Force Weepons Laboratory Attn: SPSSKirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117
Commander Field CommandAir Force Office of Scientific Research Defense Nuclear Agency1400 Wilson Blvd. Sandia BaseArlington, Virginia 22209 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87115Attn: Mechanics Div.
Director Defense Research & Engrg- Technical Library
Room 3C-128Structures Research Division The PentagonNational Aeronautics & Spce Admin. Washington, D.C. 20301Langley Research CenterLangley Station Chief, Airframe & Equipment BranchHampton, Virginia 23365 FS-120
Office of Flight StandardsNational Aeronautic & Space Admin. Federal Avalation AgencyAssociate Administrator for Advanced Washington, D.C. 20553
Research & TechnologyWashington, D.C. 02546 Chief, Research and Development
Maritime AdministrationScientific & Tech. Info. Facility- Washington, D.C. 20235NASA Representative (S-AK/DL)P.O. Box 5700 Deputy Chief, Office of Ship Constr.Bethesda, haryland 20014 Maritime Administration
Washington, D.C. 20235Attn: Mr. U.L. Russo
Frof. P.G. Hodige, Jr. Prof. J. KenmipnerUniversity of Mianesota Polytechnic Institute of Brorklyit,Dept. of Aerospace Engng & Mechanics Dept. of Aero.Engrg.& Applied MechMinneapolis, Minnesota 55455 333 Jay Street
Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201Or. D.C. Drucker
University of Illinois Prof. J. KlosnerDean of Litineering Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn
( Urbana, Illinois 61801 Dept. of Aerospace & Appl. Mech.333 Jay Street
Prof. N.M. Newmark Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201University of IllinoisDept. of Civil Engineering Prof. R.A. SchaperyUrbana, Illinois 61801 Texas A&M University
Dept. of Civil EngineeringProf. E. Reissner College Station, Texas 77040University of California, San DiegoDept. of Applied Mechanics Prof. W.D. PilkeyLa Jolla, California 92037 University of Virginia
Dept. of Aerospace EngineeringProf. William A. Nash Charlottesville, Virginia 22903University of MassachusettsDept. of Mechanics & Aerospace Engng, Dr. H.G. SchaefferAmherst, Massachusetts 01002 University of Maryland
Aerospace Engineering Dept.Library (Code 0384) College Park, Maryland 20742U.S. Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, California 93940 Prof. K.D. Willmert
Clarkson College of TechnologyProf. Arnold Allentuch Dept. of Mechanical EngineeringNewark College of Engineering Potsdam, N.Y. 13676Dept. of Mechanical Engineering323 High Street Dr. J.A. StricklinNewark, New Jersey 07102 Texas A&M University
Aerospace Engineering Dept.Dr. George Herrmann College Station, Texas 77843Stanford UniversityDept. of Applied Mechanics Dr. L.A. SchmitStanford, California 94305 University of California, LA
School of Engineering & Applied ScienceProf. J. D. Achenbach Los Angeles, California 90024Northwestern UniversityDept. of Civil Engineering Dr. H.A. KamelEvanston, Illinois 60201 The University of Arizona
Aerospace & Mech. Engineering Dept.Director, Applied Research Lab. Tucson, Arizona 85721Pennsylvania State UniversityP. 0. Box 30 Dr. B.S. BergerState College, Pennsylvania 16801 University of Maryland
Dept. of Mechanical EngineeringProf. Eugen J. Skudrzyk College Park, Makar.lAnd Z2742Pennsylvania State University Prof. . .Applied Research Laboratory Prof. G. R. IrwlnDept. of Physics - P.O. Box 30 Dept. of Mchanical Engrg.State College, Pennsylvania 16801 University of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland 20742
! Atomic Ener,' -ommirsion Prof. R.i. TestaDiv. of Rea n r Devel. h Tech. Columbia University
Germantown, Maryland 20767 Dept. of Civil EngineeringcS.W. Mudd Bldg.
Sh:p Hull Research Committee New York, N.Y. 10027y National Research Council
National Academy of Sciences Prof. H. H. Bleich2101 Constitution Avenue Columbia UniversityWashington, D.C. 20418 Dept. of Civil EngineeringAttn: Mr. A.R. Lytle Amsterdam h 120th St.
New York, N.Y. 10027
PART 2 - CONTRACTORS AND OTHER Prof. F.L. DiMaggloTECHNICAL COLLABORATORS Columbia University
Dept. of Civil -Engineering616 Mudd Building
_________tie New York, N.Y. 10027Ut
Prof. A.M. FreudenthalDr. J. Tinsley Oden - George Washington UniversityUniversity of Texas at Austin School of Engineering &345 Eng. Science Bldg. Applied ScienceAustin, Texas 78712 Washington, D.C. 20006
Prof. Julius Miklowitz 1). C. evansCalifornia Institute of Technology Univer oe U tah
P, Div. of Engineering & Applied Sciences Computer Science DivisionPasadena, California 91109 Salt Lake City, %sh 84112
; I. Dr. Harold Liebowitz, Dean Prof. Norman JonesSchool of Engr. & Applied Science Massachusetts Inst. of TechnologyGeorge Washington University Dept. of Naval Architecture I725 - 23rd St., N.W. Marine EngrngWashington, D.C. 20006 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Prof. Eli Sternberg Professor Albert I. KIingCalifornia Institute of Technology Biomechanics Research CenterDiv. of Engr. & Applied Sciences Mmne State UniversityPasadena, California 91109 Detroit, Michigan 148202
Eth Prof. Paul M. NaghdiS ertUniversity of CaliforniaDiv. of Applied Mechanicsil ; Etcheverry Hall Dr .R. Hodgson
Wh•n State UniversityBerkeley, California 94720 Sooi of MecineProfessor P. S. Symonds Detroit, Michigat 48202Brown University
PrDivision of EngineeringProvidnece, R.I. 02912 Dean B. A. Boley
i E e o2Northwestern UniversitySProf. A. J. Ourelli Technological InstituteThe Catholic University of Tmercca 2145 Sheridan RoadCivil/Mechanical Engineerinij Evanston, Illinois 60201Washington, D.C. 20017
•ndstry and Research- Institutes
Library Services Department Dr. R.C. DeHartReport Section Bldg. 14-14 Southwest Research InstituteArgonne National Laboratory Dept. of Structural Research9700 S. Cass Avenue P.O. Drawer 28510Argonne, Illinois 60440 San Antonio, Texas 78284
Dr. M. C. Junger Dr. M.L. BaronCambridge Acoustical Associates Weidlinger Associates,129 Mount Auburn St. Consulting EngineersCambridge, Massachusetts 02138 110 East 59th Street1 Dr. L.H. Chen New York, N.Y. 10022
General Dynamics Corporation Dr. W.A. von RiesemannElectric Boat Division Sandia LaboratoriesGr-oton, Connecticut 06340 . Sandia Base
Albuquerque, Ney Mexico 87115Dr. J.E. 3reensponJ.G. Engineering Research Associates Dr. T.L. Geers3831 Menlo Drive Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.Ba'.timore, Maryland 21215 Palo Alto Research Laboratory
3251 Hanover StreetDr. S. Batdorf Palo Alto, California 94304The Aerospace Corp.P.O. Box 92957 Dr. J.L. TocherLos Angeles, California 90009 Boeing Computer ServiLes, Inc.
P.O. Box 24346Dr. K.C. Park SE.Sttle, Washington 98124Lockheed Palo Alto Research LaboratoryDept. 5233, Bldg. 205 Mr. Willian Caywood3251 Hanover Street Code BBE, Applied Physics LaboratorPalo Alto, CA 94304 8621 Georgia Avenue
Silver Spring, Maryland 20034LibraryNewport News Shipbuilding & Mr. P.C. DurupDry Dock Company Lockheed-California CompanyNewport News, Virginia 23607 Aeroinechanics'Dept., 74-43
Burbank, California 91503Dr. WV.F. BozichMcDonnell Douglas Corporation5301 Bolsa Ave.Huntington Beach, CA- 92647
Dr. H.N. AbramsonSouthwest Research InstituteTechnical Vice PresidentMechanical SciencesP.O. Drawer 28510San Antonio, Texas 78284
""• iI
Dr. S.J. Fenves Prof. S.B. DongCarnegie-Mellon University University of CaliforniaDept. of Civil Engineering Dept. of MechanicsSchenley Park Los Angeles, .California 90024Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 fVf. Burt Paul -
University of PennsylvaniaDr. Ronald L. Huston Towne School of Civil & Mech. Engrg.Dept..of Engineering Analysis Rm. 113 - Towne BuildingM ail Box 112 220 S. 33rd StreetUniversity of Cincinnati Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 Prof. H.W. Liu
Dept. of Chemical Engr. A Metal.Syracuse University
Prof. George Sth Syracuse, N.Y. 13210Dept. of Mechanics Prof. S, Bodn#~rLehicgh UniversityBethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015 Technion R&D Foundation
Prof. A.S. Kobayashi Prof. R.J.H. BollardDUnepst. of Mechasicangto n g Chairman, Aeronautical Engr. Dept.Dept. of Mechanical Engneer0ing 207 Guggenheim HallSeattle, Washington 98105 University of Washington
Librarian Seattle, Washington 98105Webb Institute of Naval Architecture .................. .Crescent Beach Road, Glen Cove Prof. G.S. HellerLong Island, New York 11542 Division of Engineering
Brown UniversityProf. Daniel Frederick Providence, Rhode Island 02912Virginia Polytechnic (nstituteDept. of Engineering Mechanics Proi'-"Wrner GolsmithBlacksburg, Virginia 24061 Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
Div. of Applied MechaicsProf. A.C. Eringen University of CaliforniaDept. of Aerospace & Mech. Sciences Berkeley, California 94720Princeton UniversityPrinceton, New Jersey 08540 Prof. J.R.Rice
Division of EngineeringDr. S.L. Koh Brown UniversitySchool of Aero., Astro.& Engr. Sc. Providence, Rhode Island 02912Purdue UniversityLafayette, Indiana 47907 Prof. R.S. Rivlin
Center for the Application of Mathem,Prof. E.H. Lee Lehigh UniversityDiv. of Engrg. Mechanics Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015Stanford UniversityStanford, California 94305 Library (Code 0384)
U.S. Naval Postgraduate SchoolProf. R.D. Mindlin Monterey, California 93940Dept. of Civil Engrg.Columbia University Dr. Francis CozzarelliS.W. Mudd Building Div. of InterdisciplinaryNew York, N.Y. 10027 Studies & Research
School of EngineeringState University of New YorkBuffalo, N.Y. 14214