22
Non-Proprietary Level of Detail for Piping Stress Analyses Piping Stress Analyses Pre-Application Review Meeting May 02, 2014 0 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-Proprietary

Level of Detail for Piping Stress AnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Pre-Application Review Meeting

May 02, 2014

0 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 2: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryTable of Contents

I. Introduction

II C t D i A hII. Current Design Approach

III Proposed Design Approach

Mee

tin

g

III. Proposed Design Approach

IV. Open Discussion

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M

p

7thP

re

1 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 3: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-Proprietary

I I t d tiI. Introduction

2 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 4: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryPurpose of Meeting

KHNP needs to better understand the intent of NRC’s recent communications and clarify the scopeNRC s recent communications and clarify the scope of piping design work to be completed for the APR1400 DC application.

NRC has recently revealed its position on the level of detail for piping design in DC application: a heavy

Mee

tin

g

reliance on DAC may no longer be valid for the APR1400 DC application.

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M

No comments were identified during the acceptance review of the APR1400 DCD.

7thP

re

3 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 5: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryPiping Design Work Flow

Mee

tin

ge-

ap

pli

cati

on M

7thP

re

4 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 6: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryPiping Stress Analysis Work Flow

Mee

tin

ge-

ap

pli

cati

on M

7thP

re

5 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 7: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-Proprietary

II C t D i A hII. Current Design Approach

6 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 8: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryApplication of DAC to Piping Stress Analysis KHNP has applied DAC to piping stress analysis based on the following

NRC guidance: SECY 92-053 “Use of design acceptance criteria during 10 CFR Part 52 design

tifi ti i ”certification reviews” RG 1.206 C.III.5 “Design Acceptance Criteria” RG 1.215 “Guidance for ITAAC Closure Under 10 CFR Part 52” NEI 08-1 “Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure process Under 10 CFR Part

52”52

Completion of piping design based on the reference plant(SKN3&4) design is impractical due to the following reasons: Higher Seismic Loads

Mee

tin

g

Higher Seismic Loads Unavailability of Vendor Information Change of General Arrangement Change of ASME Code Edition

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M

To enable NRC safety determination, DAC & ITAAC has been identified in DCD Tier 1, Table 2.3 & 2.4 with two sample calculations.

7thP

re

7 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 9: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietarySummary of Piping Design Level of Detail

Class Scope DesignC l ti

Sample C l l ti

DAC Cl ITAACClass Scope Completion Calculation Closure ITAAC

RCS Piping Primary Stress

ASME Class 1 RCS

Branch DAC One S b t COL

Tier 1 Table 2.4.2-4,

2 4 4 7 4

Mee

tin

g

Branch Piping

DAC Subsystem COL 2.4.4~7-4

ASME

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M ASME Class 2&3

All Piping DAC One Subsystem COL Tier 1 Table

2.3-1

7thP

re

8 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 10: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietarySample Calculation

Two representative piping systems were selected for sample calculations.

Di t l i j ti t f t l t Direct vessel injection system from reactor vessel to containment penetration – SI101(Class 1&2)

Mee

tin

ge-

ap

pli

cati

on M

7thP

re

9 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 11: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietarySample Calculation (Cont’d)

Feedwater system from steam generator to containment penetration – FW101(Class 2)p ( )

Mee

tin

ge-

ap

pli

cati

on M

7thP

re

10 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 12: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietarySample Calculation Conformance Table with regard to DCD 3.12g

Mee

tin

ge-

ap

pli

cati

on M

7thP

re

11 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 13: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietarySample Calculation Conformance Table with regard to DCD 3.12 (Cont’d)g ( )

Mee

tin

ge-

ap

pli

cati

on M

7thP

re

12 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 14: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietarySample Calculation Conformance Table with regard to DCD 3.12 (Cont’d)g ( )

Mee

tin

ge-

ap

pli

cati

on M

7thP

re

13 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 15: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-Proprietary

III P d D i A hIII. Proposed Design Approach

14 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 16: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryApplication of Graded ApproachKHNP would like to suggest a graded approach as follows:

High Safety Significant Piping High Safety Significant Piping All class 1 piping MS & FW lines to the first 6-way rigid restraint beyond the isolation valves Piping systems design and stress analyses will be completed except for

i t l f ti l tienvironmental fatigue evaluation

Lower Safety Significant Piping Class 2&3 piping selected by Expert Panel through the failure mode &

Mee

tin

g

Class 2&3 piping selected by Expert Panel through the failure mode & effect analysis(FMEA) based on pipe hazard analysis of SKN 3&4 and safety significance of each piping.

• Detailed method and procedure of selecting class 2&3 piping will be proposed in the next PARM. A li f Cl 2&3 i i k dd h i i DAC ill b id d i

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M • A list of Class 2&3 piping packages to address the piping DAC will be provided in the DCD.

• The selected packages provide NRC with sufficient information to make a safety determination for resolving DAC.

Design documents and drawings will be prepared.

7thP

re

15 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Design documents and drawings will be prepared. Piping stress analyses will be performed by COL applicants

Page 17: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryPiping Design Scope of Work to be Completed

DescriptionDocuments/ D i

CurrentS

Forecast d

Class 1 Class 2&3Description / Drawings Status date >1” ≤2” ≥2.5”

Functional design criteria for mechanical systems andcomponents

System DesignCriteria (SDC)

Issued for DC Completed x x x

components

Preliminary system design description

System FunctionalDescription (SFD)

Issued for DC Completed x x x

Piping design methodology

DCD Tier 2, ch3.12 Issued for DC Completed x x x

Mee

tin

g

gy

Simplified piping & instrumentationdiagrams

Piping & Instrument Diagram (P&ID)

Issued for DC Completed x x

Process flow diagrams DCD Tier 2 Issued for DC Completed x x

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M or descriptions

Key piping parameters Piping Design Table (PDT)Line Index

Issued for DC

Not issued

Completed

12/2014

x

x

x

7thP

re

16 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 18: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryPiping Design Scope of Work to be Completed (cont’d)

DescriptionDocuments Current Forecast Class 1 Class 2&3

( )

Description / Drawings Status date >1” ≤2” ≥2.5”

Plant layout and arrangement information

• GA Drawings

• Piping Isometric d i

Issued for DC

27 piping S b t

Completed

12/2015 (for th )

x

x

x

x1

drawing Subsystems connected to major components

others)

Design specifications • Valve specification Not issued 12/2014 x

Mee

tin

g

for major components connected to piping systems

• Pump specification

12/2014 x

Preliminary piping stress analyses

• Summary report for class 1, 2&3

Two sample calculations

12/2015 x x2

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M y ,

• Design report for Class 1

12/2015(excluding environmental fatigue)

x

7thP

re

17 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

1. For Lower Safety Significant piping2. For MS & FW piping to the first 6-way rigid restraint beyond the isolation valves

Page 19: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryDocuments/Drawings Development

For For Class 1 Class 2&3 Documents/ Drawings For

reviewFor

audit&

>1” ≤2” ≥2.5”

Design reports for Class 1 piping1 x xg g

Summary report s of stress analysis results for class 1, 2&3 piping (TeR) 1 x x x2

Mee

tin

g

Piping isometric drawings x x x3

Line Index x x x2

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M

1. Excluding environmental fatigue evaluation2. For MS & FW piping to the first 6-way rigid restraint beyond the isolation valves

Valve/Pump Specifications x x

7thP

re

18 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

3. For Lower Safety Significant piping

Page 20: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-ProprietaryClarification Items

In the class 1 piping analysis can the In the class 1 piping analysis, can the environmental fatigue evaluation be left as a COL item ? NUREG/CR-6909(RG 1.207) is under revision. ASME Codes & Standards have not been developed

yet

Mee

tin

g

yet.

e-a

pp

lica

tion

M7th

Pre

19 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 21: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-Proprietary

IV O Di iIV. Open Discussion

20 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP

Page 22: Level of Detail for PipingStressAnalysesPiping Stress Analyses

Non-Proprietary

THANK YOUTHANK YOUTHANK YOUTHANK YOU

21 APR1400-E-B-EC-14001-NP