21
Let there be n knowledge sources (human beings or measurement instruments) which are asked to make estimations of the value of a parameter x. Each knowledge source i, i=1,…,n gives his estimation as a closed interval L a b i i , , a b i i into which he is sure that the estimated value belongs to. Definition: The uncertainty u i of an opinion L ab i i , is equal to the length of the appropriate interval, i.e.: u b a i i i , i=1,…,n. Definition: The quality q i of an opinion L a b i i , is the reverse of its uncertainty, i.e.: q u i i 1 , i=1,…,n.

Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Let there be n knowledge sources (human beings or measurement

instruments) which are asked to make estimations of the value of a

parameter x.

Each knowledge source i, i=1,…,n gives his estimation as a closed

interval L a bi i, , a bi i into which he is sure that the estimated value

belongs to.

Definition: The uncertainty ui of an opinion L a bi i, is equal to the

length of the appropriate interval, i.e.: u b ai i i , i=1,…,n.

Definition: The quality qi of an opinion L a bi i, is the reverse of its

uncertainty, i.e.: q

uii

1

, i=1,…,n.

Page 2: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Decontextualization with two Intervals

(Main Requirements)

the resulting interval should be shorter than the original

ones;

the longer the original intervals are the longer should

the resulting interval be;

shorter of the two intervals should locate closer the

resulting interval than the longer one.

Page 3: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Decontextualization with two Intervals

(Basic Formula)

Definition: The step of the decontextualization process

between opinions L a bi i, and La bj j, , u ui j , i=1,…,n

produces the following interval:

L La b

L

au a a

u ub

u b b

u u

i i

a j b j

ii i j

j ii

i i j

j i

, ( ),

( )

,

2

2 2

2

2 2

Page 4: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Decreasing Uncertainty Theorem

Theorem: Let it be that

L La b

L

a bi i

a j bj

res res, ,

, .

Then:

a) u

u u

u uresi j

i j

,

b) u ures i ,

c) u ures j

,

d) q q qres i j

.

Page 5: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Geometrical Interpretation of

Decontextualization

ai bi

aj bj

ares bres

O

A

O’

Page 6: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Extrapolation Interpretation of

Decontextualization

ai

bi

aj

bj

ares

bres

a,b

uui uj

u u

u u

i j

i j

b u ( )

a f u ( )

Page 7: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Distance Between Interval Opinions

Definition:

Let there are two interval opinions L a bi i, and La bj j, ,

i j n, ,...,1 .

The distance between these opinions is as follows:

D L L abs a a abs b ba b a b j i j ii i j j( , ) max( ( ), ( )), ,

.

Page 8: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Decontextualize Distance Theorem

If it holds that:

L La b

L

a bi i

a j b j

res res, ,

, , and u ui j , then:

D L L D L La b a b a b a bres res i i res res j j( , ) ( , ), , , ,

.

It means: shorter of the two intervals is located closer to

the resulting interval than the longer one.

Page 9: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Operating with Several Intervals

The resulting interval:

L La b a b

L

res res

a b

L an bn

, ,

,...

,

1 1

2 2

obtained as

decontextualization of n intervals L i na bi i, , ,..., 1, u uk k 1

can be calculated recursively as follows:

L La b a bres res1 1 1 1, ,

;

L L i n

a b a b

L

resi resi resi resi

ai bi

, ,

,, ,...,

1 1

2;

L La b a bres res resn resn, ,

.

Page 10: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Uncertainty Associativity Theorem

If it holds that:

( ), ,

, ,

' 'L L

a b

L L

a bi i

a j b j ak bk

res res ,

and

L La b

L

a bi i

a j b j

Lak bk

res res,

( )

,

,

,

'' '' ,

then: u ures res' '' .

Page 11: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

An Example:

Let us suppose that three knowledge sources 1, 2, and 3 evaluate

the attribute x to be within the following intervals:

L La b1 1 9 12, ,, L La b2 2 6 11, ,

, L La b3 3 0 10, ,.

The resulting interval is derived by the recursive procedure:

L L La b a bres res1 1 1 1 9 12, , , ;

L L L La b a b

L L

res res res res

a b

2 2 1 1

2 2 6 11

9 12 10 687512 5625, , , . , ., ,

;

L L L

L

a b a b

L L

res res res res

a b

3 3 2 2

3 3 0 10

10 6875 12 5625

110769 12 6559

, , . , .

. , .

, ,

,

and thus: L L La b a bres res res res, , . , . 3 3

110769 12 6559 .

Page 12: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

An Example:

L La b1 1 9 12, , , L La b2 2 6 11, , , L La b3 3 0 10, , ,

L L La b a bres res res res, , . , . 3 3

110769 12 6559

a2 b2

a3 b3

ares bres

a1 b1

x0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Page 13: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

A Trend of Uncertainty Group Definition

There are seven groups of trends Lk

dir powk k with direction

dirk and power powk

Each pair of intervals L L L i ja b a b a bi i j j, , ,, ,

0 0 ,

belonging to the same group Lk

dir powk k keep the sign of

a b , a , and b where a a a b b bj i j i , .

Direction and power of a trend are defined by a concrete

combination of signs for a b , a , and b .

Page 14: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Direction of a Trend Group

The direction of a trend group is:

left (‘l’), centre (‘c’), right (‘r’),

and it is defined by the sign of a b :

( ) ' ' a b dir lk 0 ;

( ) ' ' a b dir ck 0 ;

Page 15: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

( ) ' ' a b dir rk 0 .

Power of a Trend Group

The power of a trend group is:

slow (‘<’), medium (‘=’), fast (‘>’)

and it is defined by the signs of a and b :

(( ) ( )) ' a and b powk 0 0 ' ;

(( ) ( )) ' ' a or b powk 0 0 ;

Page 16: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

(( ) ( )) ' ' a or b powk 0 0 .

Seven Groups of Uncertainty Trends

Trend Direction left central right

Power Restrictions a b 0 a b 0 a b 0

slow ( )

( )

a and

and b

0

0 Ll Lc

Lr

medium ( )

( )

a or

or b

0

0 Ll

does not exist Lr

Page 17: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

fast ( )

( )

a or

or b

0

0 Ll

does not exist Lr

An Example of Left Trends: L L Ll l l , ,

a3 b3

a4 b4

a1 b1

x

a2 b2

a)

a3 b3

a4 b4

a1 b1

x

a2 b2

b)

Page 18: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

a3 b3

a4 b4

a1 b1

x

a2 b2

c)

A Trend Keeping Theorem

Let

L La b

L

a bi i

a j bj

res res, ,

, ,

Page 19: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

then the interval L a bres res, belongs to the same

trend group as intervals L La b a bi i j j, ,

,.

A Support of a Trend

Let us suppose that n interval opinions L i na bi i, , ,... 1 are

divided into m trends L k mk , ,... 1 .

The support Sk for the trend Lk is defined as follows:

Page 20: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

S qN

k resk

ii L Lai bi k

1

, , , (*)

where qresk

is the quality of the result L

a bresk

resk, , Ni is the number

of different trends that includes the opinion L a bi i, .

(*) As one can see the Definition gives more support for the trend that includes more intervals and the support of

each interval is divided equally between all the trends that include this interval.

Deriving Resulting Interval from Several Trends

Let the set of original interval opinions L L i na bi i , , ,..., 1

consists of m different trends L k mk , ,..., 1 with their

resulting interval opinions L

a bresk

resk, and support Sk .

Page 21: Let there be n · S q k res N k i L a L i i bi k ¦ 1 where q res k is the quality of the result L> a b @ res k res, k, N i is the number of different trends that includes the opinion

Then the resulting opinion L

a bresL

resL, for the whole original set of

interval opinions is derived as follows:

aa S a S a S

S S S

bb S b S b S

S S S

resL res res res

mm

m

resL res res res

mm

m

11

22

1 2

11

22

1 2

...

...;

...

.... (**)

(**) The resulting interval is expected to be closer to the result of those trends that have more support among

the original set of intervals.