Upload
eustacia-hood
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lessons learnt on scaling-up multiple-use water services
Barbara van KoppenInternational Water Management Institute
1
2
1 Andes (Colombia & Bolivia)
2 Limpopo (Zimbabwe & South Africa)
3 Nile (Ethiopia)
3
4 Indus-Ganges (India & Nepal)
5 Mekong (Thailand)
45
Lessons from the Learning Alliances of the ‘MUS project’
of the Challenge Program Water and Food
This presentation
Project focus on
Homestead-scale MUS
Community-scale MUS
Scaling-up by five water stakeholder groups
Water users, CBOs, and local private service providers
NGOs
Domestic sector
Productive sector
Local government
Homestead-scale MUS50-100 lpcd; 5 lpcd safe
‘most MDG per drop’
healthlabour saving,
gender
resilient food and income….
..from livestock..from fish
..from enterprise
..from crops
Community-scale MUS Multiple sources, shared infrastructure, re-use
People’s participation for livelihoods and sustainability
1. Water users, CBOs
Own investments and innovations for self-supply and local management have always been for MUS
Seeking to integrate fragmented professional support
Communal self-supply in peri-urban Cochabamba, Bolivia
Farmer Wisdom Network N.E. Thailand
Water for Food Movement South Africa
2. NGOs
MUS increasingly obvious for livelihoods goals
Technological innovation homestead-&community-scale MUS
Institutionalizing MUS in government for sustainability and upscaling
Mvuramanzi, Zimbabwe
CRS, Adi Daero basin,
Ethiopia
IDE, Nepal
3. Domestic sector
Targeting everybody, including the poor, and homesteads Single-use expertise on health Expertise on engineering and management for small-scale usesClaiming unplanned livelihood benefits Recognizing higher design norms for anticipated expansionFuture planning for higher service levels, with 5 lpcd safe Moving up from ‘add-ons’ to community-scale MUS
Cinara, PAAR, Colombia
IDE, Jalswarajya/Aple Pani Maharashtra
4. Productive sector
Expertise on productive end-uses at fields and direct access (crops, soils, markets, livestock, fisheries)
Expertise on engineering and management for larger-scale uses and water resources management
Recognizing the homestead as a site of pro-poor and gender-equitable productive water uses, besides domestic uses
Moving from ‘irrigation add-ons’ to community-scale MUS
5. Local government
Permanent democratic interface to match communities’ needs with fragmented support
Developing implementation capacity for iterative community-scale MUS (e.g. SADC seven steps approach)
AWARD, South Africa, integrating MUS in municipal Integrated Development Plans
In sum Opportunities for Scaling-up MUS
Water users, CBOs and NGOs:
Community-scale MUS for livelihoods
Homestead-scale MUS a likely priority
Domestic and productive sectors:
Merging resources and expertise on engineering and management across sites and scales;
Providing single-use expertise according to people’s priorities
Local government: the coordinator
Thank you
for your attention
All outputs at
www.musproject.net
www.musgroup.net
CRS, Adi Daero sub-basin, Ethiopia