Upload
coen
View
70
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb. 26 August 2010. Intro & Selections. Reference current ttbar selections New: Mt < 25 Electrons: endcap alignment correction for data, no Δη Data & Monte Carlo samples listed at the end . W contribution to QCD Fake Rates. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Lepton Fakes in ~ 840 /nb
26 August 2010
Intro & Selections
• Reference current ttbar selections– New: Mt < 25
• Electrons: endcap alignment correction for data, no Δη
• Data & Monte Carlo samples listed at the end
2
W contribution to QCD Fake Rates
• We want to measure the rate of fake leptons from QCD in data
• Leptonic W decays will contribute to some extent– We have so far required low MET ( tcmet < 20 GeV )
to reduce the contribution from W– We now require low transverse mass also ( Mt < 25 )
• What effect does the presence of W have on the fake rate?
3
Electron Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
QCD_Pt30 OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
Presence of W does not dominate Fake Rate - W contribution introduces some bias - QCD prevails 4
( No cuts on MET or Mt )
Muon Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
W contribution suppressed by requiring low MET and Mt - We have been requiring tcmet < 20, we now require Mt < 25 also - W domination delayed by ~10 GeV in Pt - underlying QCD Fake Rate unaffected
InclusiveMu15 + Wmunu
InclusiveMu15 + Wmunu - tcmet< 20 AND Mt < 25
InclusiveMu15
InclusiveMu15- tcmet< 20 AND Mt < 25
5
Fake Rate Dominated by W
Muon Fake Rates – Comparison of Data and Monte Carlo
W evident in Data also - Good data / MC agreement - W starts to dominate above ~ 35 GeV
How do we estimate the fake rate for Pt > 35 where W is irreducible? - Simply use the fake rate from the 30-35 GeV Pt bin for Pt > 35 GeV - QCD background peaks at low Pt and QCD FR is somewhat flat - Alternatively, use fake rate from b tagged jets
Data ( HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet )MC InclusiveMu15 + WmunuMC InclusiveMu15
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
6
Fake Rates - Jet vs. Lepton Triggered
• Lepton fake rates have so far been determined from jet triggered ( HLT_Jet15U ) samples– Then require offline lepton away from jet trigger
• Jet triggers are now heavily prescaled– HLT_Jet15U prescale is now 200 ( 4.1 v3 at 3.5x1030 )
• Alternatively, can derive fake rates from lepton triggered samples ( Mu9, Ele10_LW_L1R )– Then apply threshold to offline jet away from lepton
• Lepton & Jet triggers should give the same result – Lepton triggers offer more statistics
7
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of Jet & Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Jet15UHLT_Ele10_LW_L1RAND 15 GeV Offline Jet
Jet & Lepton Triggered Fake Rates are Comparable - Lepton Triggered samples offer higher statistics
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
8
Muon Fake Rates in DataComparison of Jet & Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Jet15U
HLT_Mu9 AND15 GeV Offline Jet
Jet & Lepton Triggered Fake Rates Agree Before Run 137000 - Difference after run 137000 not yet understood - Lepton triggered samples offer higher statistics
9
Runs before 137000All Runs
Jet Threshold Dependence of Lepton Fake Rates
• Systematic errors are estimated by measuring the dependence of the fake rate on the jet threshold
• Comparison of lepton triggered fake rates with different offline jet pt thresholds are shown on the following slides
10
Muon Fake Rates in DataDependence on Jet Threshold
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
Systematics ~ 50%Isolation relaxed ( 0.15 to 0.40 ) in the muon fake rate denominator
11
HLT_Mu9
5 GeV 15 GeV 30 GeV 50 GeV
Electron Fake Rates in DataDependence on Jet Threshold
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
12
HLT_Ele10_LW_L1R 5 GeV 15 GeV 30 GeV 50 GeV
Systematics ~ 50%V2 fake rate ( which does not relax isolation) shows least dependence on jet threshold
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
Summary• Leptons from W decay pollute QCD fake rates
– Results in tolerable bias for electrons– Muon fake rate is dominated by W above ~ 35 GeV in
spite of requiring low MET and Mt. • Solution: Extend fake rate from lower Pt or require b tagged jets
• Fake rates derived from lepton triggers offer more statistics than those from jet triggers
• Jet Threshold– Systematics ~ 50%
13
Samples• /InclusiveMu15/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO• /QCD_Pt30/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • /Wenu/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO• /Wmunu/Spring10-START3X_V26_S09-v1/GEN-SIM-RECO
• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_EG-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v1/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v2/RECO• /EG/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO
• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_Mu-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v1/RECO• /Mu/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO
• /MinimumBias/Commissioning10-SD_JetMETTau-Jun14thSkim_v1/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-Jun14thReReco_v2/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-Jul16thReReco-v1/RECO• /JetMETTau/Run2010A-PromptReco-v4/RECO
14
Backup Slides
15
16
Runs < 137000 Runs > 137000 Runs < 139000
Runs > 139000 Runs < 141000
Runs > 141000 Runs < 143000
Run Dependence of Muon Fake Rate
All Runs Runs > 136500HLT_15u
HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet
Discrepancy between Jet & Lepton triggered FR for runs>137000 not understood
Difference between Jet15U and Muon triggers at high PT?
• This was also seen earlier in the summer• The most likely explanation was that of a run
dependence– Jet15U samples the very earliest runs– Muon triggers are uniform
• We need to verify this again by making the same plots as the previous page but broken up in run periods
• Slide from this summer are in backup (as a reminder of what we had then)
17
Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010
18
Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010
19
Slide circulated in an emai message by Claudio on 10 July 2010
20
Electron Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
QCD_Pt30 OnlyWeν OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν
Numerator & Denominator Pt distributions
Num V2 DenV1 Den V3 Den
Fake Rates
QCD_Pt30 OnlyQCD_Pt30 + Weν
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
Presence of W does not dominate Fake Rate at high Pt 21
Muon Fake Rates in Monte Carlo
W dominates Fake Rate above ~ 25 GeV
InclusiveMu15 + WmunuInclusiveMu15Wmunu
Fake Rate DenominatorNumerator
22
Muon Fake Rates – Comparison of Data and Monte Carlo
W evident in Data also- Good agreement between data and Monte Carlo - W starts to dominate above ~ 35 GeV
Data ( HLT_Mu9 AND 15 GeV Offline Jet )InclusiveMu15 + WmunuInclusiveMu15Wmunu
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
Fake Rate DenominatorNumerator
W Supression:- tcmet< 20 - Mt < 25
23
Muon Fake Rates in DataDependence on Muon Trigger
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
Fake Rate stable for different Muon triggers
W Supression:- tcmet< 20 - Mt < 25
24
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 10 & 15 GeV Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Ele10_LW_L1RHLT_Ele15_LW_L1R
W Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
25Electron 10 & 15 triggers are comparable
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 10 GeV Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Ele10_LW_L1RHLT_Ele10_SW_L1RHLT_Ele10_LW_EleId_L1RHLT_Ele10_SW_EleId_L1RW Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
26Trigger ID increases V1 & V2 Fake Rates
Trigger ID cancels out in V3.
V1 & V2 have no offline ID. Trigger IDdecreases the denominator, increasing the Fake Rate
Electron Fake Rates in DataComparison of 15 GeV Lepton Triggers
Luminosity ~ 840 / nb
HLT_Ele15_LW_L1RHLT_Ele15_SW_L1RHLT_Ele15_SW_EleId_L1RHLT_Ele15_LW_CaloEleId_L1RW Supression: tcmet< 20, Mt < 25
V1 Fake Rate V3 Fake RateV2 Fake Rate
27Trigger ID increases V1 & V2 Fake Rates
Electron Selections• ttbar: Tight Electron Selections
– Pt > 10– SC Et > 10– |η| < 2.5– ECAL Seeded– Spike Removal– VBTF 90 ID
• Data corrected for Endcap alignment• dEta cut removed
– d0 < 400 – Iso< 0.15– No muon with dR of 0.10– Conversion Rejection
• Hit Pattern• Dist < 002• Dcottheta< 002
• Loose Electron Selections– d0 removed for V1, V2, V3– V1: V2 AND V3– V2: Electron ID removed– V3: Isolation relaxed to 0.40
28