Upload
sam13scribd
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
1/38
Spatial Interpolation
GEOS 5350
Demers, M.N., Geographic Information Systems
Chang, Kang-tsung, Introduction to geographicinformation systems
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
2/38
Spatial interpolation is theestimation the value of
properties at unsampled
sites
within the area covered by
existing observations (controlpoints).
Calculates some property of
the surface at a given point
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
3/38
Classifications of interpolations
1- Global & Local interpolation2- Exact interpolation & Inexact Interpolation
3 -
Deterministic and Stochastic
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
4/38
1 -
Global and Local Interpolation
Global interpolation:
uses all available control points
Adequate for terraines
that do not show abrupt
variations
Assumes good spatial autocorrelation on regionalscales
More generalized estimationsLocal interpolation:
uses a sample of control points
Adequate for terraines
that show abrupt variations
Assumes good spatial autocorrelation on local scales
More local estimations
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
5/38
2 - Exact interpolation & InexactInterpolation
Exact interpolation
Predicts a value at control points that is the same asthe observed values.
The interpolation produces a surface that passes bythe control points
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
6/38
Continue
Inexact InterpolationPredicts a value for the control points that differ
from the observed value
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
7/38
3 - Deterministic and StochasticDeterministic interpolation
No assessment of errors with the predictedvalues
Stochastic interpolation
Offers assessment of errors with predictedvalues. These methods assume random
errors
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
8/38
Examples
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
9/38
First-order trend surface (polynomial)
I - Global(a) First-order trend surface
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
10/38
Example
(1)
Set up 3 equations
(2)
Re-write in matrix format
(3)
Calculate
X = 377
Y = 318
X2
= 29007
Y2
= 20714
XY = 23862
YZ = 4445.8
XZ = 5044
X Y Z X2 Y2 XY XZ YZ
69 76 20.82 4761 5776 5244 1437 1582.32
59 64 10.91 3481 4096 3776 643.7 698.24
75 52 10.38 5625 2704 3900 778.5 539.76
86 73 14.6 7396 5329 6278 1256 1065.8
88 53 10.56 7744 2809 4664 929.3 559.68
377 318 67.27 29007 20714 23862 5044 4445.8
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
11/38
Continue
(4) Plug in values for 5 points
(5) Solve for b coefficients:Multiply inverse of left matrix byright matrix
(6) Use the b coefficients tocalculate z
for any point
(X,Y) (69, 67)
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
12/38
(b) Higher-order trend surface
First order polynomials
(inclined surface) can notrepresent the complexnatural surfaces.
A cubic or third ordermodels can betterrepresent such surfaces(e.g., hills, valleys)
Third-order trend surface
(nine coefficients)
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
13/38
Example
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
14/38
II - LocalIt is all about mechanisms for the selection of a suite of control points
Closest points Points within a certain radius
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
15/38
(a) - Trends (polynomials) could belocal
Local polynomials as opposedto global polynomials could be
used as well for betterrepresentation of surfaces
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
16/38
(b) -
Theissen
Polygons
Also called proximal
method
Attempts to weight data points
by area
Commonly used for
precipitation data
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
17/38
Continue
Triangles are drawn connecting control points (e.g.,stations) using the Delaunay triangulation technique
(also used for TIN)
Lines are drawn perpendicular to sides of triangles at
their midpoints
Polygons are defined by intersections of these lines
Values for control points are assigned to enclosingpolygons
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
18/38
(c)- Density EstimationSimple density functions:
Number of points/cell size
(e.g., 10,000 m2)(shown inshades of grey)
Size of circle centered atcenter of cell size
Other methods include
Kernel density estimation
Kernel density function is a
commonly used alternative
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
19/38
(d)- Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)Interpolation
Estimated value at point 0
Is the z value at control point i
Distance between point I and point 0
The larger the k, the greater the influence
of neighboring points.
S number of used points
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
20/38
Continue
Zi d i d i2
1/(di2
) Zi x 1/(d i2
)
20.82 18 324 0.0031 0.06426
10.91 20.88 435.97 0.0023 0.02502
10.38 32.31 1043.9 0.0010 0.00994
14.6 36.05 1299.6 0.0008 0.01123
10.56 47.2 2227.8 0.0004 0.00474
SUM 0.0076 0.11520
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
21/38
Examplezi Between
points
Distance
(di
)
20.82 0,1 18
10.91 0,2 20.88
10.38 0,3 32.31
14.6 0,4 36.05
10.56 0,5 47.20
Assuming k = 2
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
22/38
All values are within themaximum & minimum values ofknown points
Small enclosed isolines
are
typical of this method
Annual precipitation surface created by
inverse distance squared
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
23/38
(e) - Radial Basis Functions (RBF) Splines
A large group of interpolation methods
Exact interpolators The difference between them is how thesurface fits between the control points Each RBF also has a parameter thatcontrols the smoothness of generated
surface Differences between the outputs of thesemethods are small
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
24/38
Continue
Exact Function
Good for large smoother surfaces
Doesnt work well with abruptchanges
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
25/38
Continue
Creates a surface passing by control point
and has the least possible change in slopeat all points
Unlike the IDW method, predicted values arenot limited to the Max and Min dictated by
data.
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
26/38
Kriging Next Lecture
Geostatistical
Methods
Ordinary Kriging Simple Kriging
Universal Kriging
Indicator Kriging Probability Kriging Disjunctive Kriging Cokriging
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
27/38
Integrated Seismic Risk Map of
Egypt
Generate Egypts first seismic risk map using a GIS
approach
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
28/38
Red Sea-related Seismicity
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
29/38
Seismic Risks & Hazards
Seismic hazard
---
Strength and frequency
of shaking from earthquakes,
Seismic risk ---- The chance of losing humanlife and/or property because of earthquakeground shaking.
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
30/38
Maps in the GISSeismic hazard map ---- Probability of occurrenceof seismic ground shaking within a certain time
frameFault hazard map -- Surface & subsurface faultzones subject to re-activation,
Amplification map -- Distribution of alluviumdeposits that amplify ground shaking,Liquefaction map
---
Areas susceptible (shallow
groundwater, seismically active) to soil (sand/silt)liquefaction,
Population density map
---
Areas subject to
increased risk of loss in human life and property.
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
31/38
Seismic
Hazard Map
Probability of occurrence of seismic ground shaking of a
certain intensity (peak ground acceleration PGA) in a
specified time interval (250 years)
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
32/38
Distribution
Map
Frequency Map
# of earthquakes/cell
H d F lt M
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
33/38
Hazard Fault MapFaults proximal to earthquake epicenters &
could be reactivated under current stress
regimes
H d F lt M
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
34/38
Hazard Fault Map
Intersection of the fault & distribution maps
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
35/38
Amplification Map
Earthquake ground motions areamplified by alluvium soil deposits
S il H d Li f i M
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
36/38
Soil Hazard Liquefaction Map
Intersection of earthquake coverage map withcoverage map for soils that are saturated, porous,and have shallow water table (i.e., Nile deposits)
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
37/38
Population Risk Map
Highly populated areas affected by seismicity
(low to high PGA)
7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011
38/38