Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    1/38

    Spatial Interpolation

    GEOS 5350

    Demers, M.N., Geographic Information Systems

    Chang, Kang-tsung, Introduction to geographicinformation systems

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    2/38

    Spatial interpolation is theestimation the value of

    properties at unsampled

    sites

    within the area covered by

    existing observations (controlpoints).

    Calculates some property of

    the surface at a given point

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    3/38

    Classifications of interpolations

    1- Global & Local interpolation2- Exact interpolation & Inexact Interpolation

    3 -

    Deterministic and Stochastic

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    4/38

    1 -

    Global and Local Interpolation

    Global interpolation:

    uses all available control points

    Adequate for terraines

    that do not show abrupt

    variations

    Assumes good spatial autocorrelation on regionalscales

    More generalized estimationsLocal interpolation:

    uses a sample of control points

    Adequate for terraines

    that show abrupt variations

    Assumes good spatial autocorrelation on local scales

    More local estimations

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    5/38

    2 - Exact interpolation & InexactInterpolation

    Exact interpolation

    Predicts a value at control points that is the same asthe observed values.

    The interpolation produces a surface that passes bythe control points

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    6/38

    Continue

    Inexact InterpolationPredicts a value for the control points that differ

    from the observed value

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    7/38

    3 - Deterministic and StochasticDeterministic interpolation

    No assessment of errors with the predictedvalues

    Stochastic interpolation

    Offers assessment of errors with predictedvalues. These methods assume random

    errors

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    8/38

    Examples

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    9/38

    First-order trend surface (polynomial)

    I - Global(a) First-order trend surface

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    10/38

    Example

    (1)

    Set up 3 equations

    (2)

    Re-write in matrix format

    (3)

    Calculate

    X = 377

    Y = 318

    X2

    = 29007

    Y2

    = 20714

    XY = 23862

    YZ = 4445.8

    XZ = 5044

    X Y Z X2 Y2 XY XZ YZ

    69 76 20.82 4761 5776 5244 1437 1582.32

    59 64 10.91 3481 4096 3776 643.7 698.24

    75 52 10.38 5625 2704 3900 778.5 539.76

    86 73 14.6 7396 5329 6278 1256 1065.8

    88 53 10.56 7744 2809 4664 929.3 559.68

    377 318 67.27 29007 20714 23862 5044 4445.8

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    11/38

    Continue

    (4) Plug in values for 5 points

    (5) Solve for b coefficients:Multiply inverse of left matrix byright matrix

    (6) Use the b coefficients tocalculate z

    for any point

    (X,Y) (69, 67)

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    12/38

    (b) Higher-order trend surface

    First order polynomials

    (inclined surface) can notrepresent the complexnatural surfaces.

    A cubic or third ordermodels can betterrepresent such surfaces(e.g., hills, valleys)

    Third-order trend surface

    (nine coefficients)

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    13/38

    Example

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    14/38

    II - LocalIt is all about mechanisms for the selection of a suite of control points

    Closest points Points within a certain radius

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    15/38

    (a) - Trends (polynomials) could belocal

    Local polynomials as opposedto global polynomials could be

    used as well for betterrepresentation of surfaces

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    16/38

    (b) -

    Theissen

    Polygons

    Also called proximal

    method

    Attempts to weight data points

    by area

    Commonly used for

    precipitation data

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    17/38

    Continue

    Triangles are drawn connecting control points (e.g.,stations) using the Delaunay triangulation technique

    (also used for TIN)

    Lines are drawn perpendicular to sides of triangles at

    their midpoints

    Polygons are defined by intersections of these lines

    Values for control points are assigned to enclosingpolygons

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    18/38

    (c)- Density EstimationSimple density functions:

    Number of points/cell size

    (e.g., 10,000 m2)(shown inshades of grey)

    Size of circle centered atcenter of cell size

    Other methods include

    Kernel density estimation

    Kernel density function is a

    commonly used alternative

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    19/38

    (d)- Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)Interpolation

    Estimated value at point 0

    Is the z value at control point i

    Distance between point I and point 0

    The larger the k, the greater the influence

    of neighboring points.

    S number of used points

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    20/38

    Continue

    Zi d i d i2

    1/(di2

    ) Zi x 1/(d i2

    )

    20.82 18 324 0.0031 0.06426

    10.91 20.88 435.97 0.0023 0.02502

    10.38 32.31 1043.9 0.0010 0.00994

    14.6 36.05 1299.6 0.0008 0.01123

    10.56 47.2 2227.8 0.0004 0.00474

    SUM 0.0076 0.11520

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    21/38

    Examplezi Between

    points

    Distance

    (di

    )

    20.82 0,1 18

    10.91 0,2 20.88

    10.38 0,3 32.31

    14.6 0,4 36.05

    10.56 0,5 47.20

    Assuming k = 2

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    22/38

    All values are within themaximum & minimum values ofknown points

    Small enclosed isolines

    are

    typical of this method

    Annual precipitation surface created by

    inverse distance squared

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    23/38

    (e) - Radial Basis Functions (RBF) Splines

    A large group of interpolation methods

    Exact interpolators The difference between them is how thesurface fits between the control points Each RBF also has a parameter thatcontrols the smoothness of generated

    surface Differences between the outputs of thesemethods are small

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    24/38

    Continue

    Exact Function

    Good for large smoother surfaces

    Doesnt work well with abruptchanges

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    25/38

    Continue

    Creates a surface passing by control point

    and has the least possible change in slopeat all points

    Unlike the IDW method, predicted values arenot limited to the Max and Min dictated by

    data.

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    26/38

    Kriging Next Lecture

    Geostatistical

    Methods

    Ordinary Kriging Simple Kriging

    Universal Kriging

    Indicator Kriging Probability Kriging Disjunctive Kriging Cokriging

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    27/38

    Integrated Seismic Risk Map of

    Egypt

    Generate Egypts first seismic risk map using a GIS

    approach

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    28/38

    Red Sea-related Seismicity

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    29/38

    Seismic Risks & Hazards

    Seismic hazard

    ---

    Strength and frequency

    of shaking from earthquakes,

    Seismic risk ---- The chance of losing humanlife and/or property because of earthquakeground shaking.

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    30/38

    Maps in the GISSeismic hazard map ---- Probability of occurrenceof seismic ground shaking within a certain time

    frameFault hazard map -- Surface & subsurface faultzones subject to re-activation,

    Amplification map -- Distribution of alluviumdeposits that amplify ground shaking,Liquefaction map

    ---

    Areas susceptible (shallow

    groundwater, seismically active) to soil (sand/silt)liquefaction,

    Population density map

    ---

    Areas subject to

    increased risk of loss in human life and property.

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    31/38

    Seismic

    Hazard Map

    Probability of occurrence of seismic ground shaking of a

    certain intensity (peak ground acceleration PGA) in a

    specified time interval (250 years)

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    32/38

    Distribution

    Map

    Frequency Map

    # of earthquakes/cell

    H d F lt M

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    33/38

    Hazard Fault MapFaults proximal to earthquake epicenters &

    could be reactivated under current stress

    regimes

    H d F lt M

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    34/38

    Hazard Fault Map

    Intersection of the fault & distribution maps

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    35/38

    Amplification Map

    Earthquake ground motions areamplified by alluvium soil deposits

    S il H d Li f i M

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    36/38

    Soil Hazard Liquefaction Map

    Intersection of earthquake coverage map withcoverage map for soils that are saturated, porous,and have shallow water table (i.e., Nile deposits)

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    37/38

    Population Risk Map

    Highly populated areas affected by seismicity

    (low to high PGA)

  • 7/28/2019 Lecture8_interpolationf_2011

    38/38