Upload
javen-peay
View
232
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lecture 7: Langevin equations II:geometric Brownian motion and
perturbation theory
Outline:• Geometric Brownian motion, Stratonovich and Ito models
• Ito calculus method • small noise correlation time method (Stratonovich only)• solution using Fokker-Planck equation
• Perturbation theory for nonlinear Langevin equations• diagrammatic expansion• self-consistent approximations
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
model of share prices
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
Start with equation in differential form:
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
€
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x, ′ F (x) =1
x, ′ ′ F (x) = −
1
x 2
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x, ′ F (x) =1
x, ′ ′ F (x) = −
1
x 2
dF = ′ F (x)u(x) + + 12 σ 2 ′ ′ F (x)G2(x)( )dt + σ ′ F (x)G(x)dW
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x, ′ F (x) =1
x, ′ ′ F (x) = −
1
x 2
dF = ′ F (x)u(x) + + 12 σ 2 ′ ′ F (x)G2(x)( )dt + σ ′ F (x)G(x)dW
=1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟rx + 1
2 σ 2 −1
x 2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟x 2
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥dt + σ
1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟xdW
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x, ′ F (x) =1
x, ′ ′ F (x) = −
1
x 2
dF = ′ F (x)u(x) + + 12 σ 2 ′ ′ F (x)G2(x)( )dt + σ ′ F (x)G(x)dW
=1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟rx + 1
2 σ 2 −1
x 2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟x 2
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥dt + σ
1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟xdW
= r − 12 σ 2
( )dt + σdW
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
F = log x(t) is normally distributed with mean (r – ½σ2)t and variance σ2t
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x, ′ F (x) =1
x, ′ ′ F (x) = −
1
x 2
dF = ′ F (x)u(x) + + 12 σ 2 ′ ′ F (x)G2(x)( )dt + σ ′ F (x)G(x)dW
=1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟rx + 1
2 σ 2 −1
x 2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟x 2
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥dt + σ
1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟xdW
= r − 12 σ 2
( )dt + σdW
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
F = log x(t) is normally distributed with mean (r – ½σ2)t and variance σ2t => x(t) is log-normally distributed:
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x, ′ F (x) =1
x, ′ ′ F (x) = −
1
x 2
dF = ′ F (x)u(x) + + 12 σ 2 ′ ′ F (x)G2(x)( )dt + σ ′ F (x)G(x)dW
=1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟rx + 1
2 σ 2 −1
x 2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟x 2
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥dt + σ
1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟xdW
= r − 12 σ 2
( )dt + σdW
“Geometric Brownian motion” (GBM) with Ito calculus and Ito convention
F = log x(t) is normally distributed with mean (r – ½σ2)t and variance σ2t => x(t) is log-normally distributed:
€
P(x) =1
x 2πσ 2texp −
log x − r −σ 2 /2( )t( )2
2σ 2t
⎡
⎣
⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥ ⎥
Start with equation in differential form:
Apply Ito’s lemma with
model of share prices
€
x(0) =1( )
€
dx = rxdt + σxdW (t)
G(x) = x, F(x) = log x, ′ F (x) =1
x, ′ ′ F (x) = −
1
x 2
dF = ′ F (x)u(x) + + 12 σ 2 ′ ′ F (x)G2(x)( )dt + σ ′ F (x)G(x)dW
=1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟rx + 1
2 σ 2 −1
x 2
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟x 2
⎡
⎣ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥dt + σ
1
x
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟xdW
= r − 12 σ 2
( )dt + σdW
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
= nx n−1( )rxdt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )x 2dt + σ nx n−1
( )xdW
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
= nx n−1( )rxdt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )x 2dt + σ nx n−1
( )xdW
= n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndW
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
= nx n−1( )rxdt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )x 2dt + σ nx n−1
( )xdW
= n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndW
d x n
dt= n r + 1
2 σ 2(n −1)( ) x n dt
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
= nx n−1( )rxdt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )x 2dt + σ nx n−1
( )xdW
= n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndW
d x n
dt= n r + 1
2 σ 2(n −1)( ) x n dt
x n (t) = exp n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )t[ ] x(0) =1( )in particular,
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
= nx n−1( )rxdt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )x 2dt + σ nx n−1
( )xdW
= n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndW
d x n
dt= n r + 1
2 σ 2(n −1)( ) x n dt
x n (t) = exp n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )t[ ] x(0) =1( )
x(t) = exp rt( )
in particular,
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
= nx n−1( )rxdt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )x 2dt + σ nx n−1
( )xdW
= n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndW
d x n
dt= n r + 1
2 σ 2(n −1)( ) x n dt
x n (t) = exp n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )t[ ] x(0) =1( )
x(t) = exp rt( )
x 2(t) = exp 2 r + 12 σ 2
( )t[ ]
in particular,
moments of x(t)can get moments of x(t) from this or directly from the SDE and Ito’s lemma:
€
d(x n ) = nx n−1( )u(x)dt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )G
2(x)dt + σ nx n−1( )G(x)dW
= nx n−1( )rxdt + 1
2 σ 2 n(n −1)x n−2( )x 2dt + σ nx n−1
( )xdW
= n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndW
d x n
dt= n r + 1
2 σ 2(n −1)( ) x n dt
x n (t) = exp n r + 12 σ 2(n −1)( )t[ ] x(0) =1( )
x(t) = exp rt( )
x 2(t) = exp 2 r + 12 σ 2
( )t[ ]
CV 2 =x 2(t) − x(t)
2
x(t)2 = exp σ 2t( ) −1
in particular,
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
= u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + σG(x)dW (t)
in our current notation
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
= u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + σG(x)dW (t)
= rx + 12 σ 2x( )dt + σxdW (t)
in our current notation
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
= u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + σG(x)dW (t)
= rx + 12 σ 2x( )dt + σxdW (t)
in our current notation
same as for Ito convention except r -> r + ½σ2
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
= u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + σG(x)dW (t)
= rx + 12 σ 2x( )dt + σxdW (t)
d log x = rdt + σdW (t)
in our current notation
same as for Ito convention except r -> r + ½σ2
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
= u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + σG(x)dW (t)
= rx + 12 σ 2x( )dt + σxdW (t)
d log x = rdt + σdW (t)
in our current notation
same as for Ito convention except r -> r + ½σ2
€
⇒ P(x) =1
x 2πσ 2texp −
log x − rt( )2
2σ 2t
⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ ⎥
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
= u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + σG(x)dW (t)
= rx + 12 σ 2x( )dt + σxdW (t)
d log x = rdt + σdW (t)
in our current notation
same as for Ito convention except r -> r + ½σ2
€
⇒ P(x) =1
x 2πσ 2texp −
log x − rt( )2
2σ 2t
⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ ⎥
€
d(x n ) = n r + 12 σ 2 + 1
2 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndWmoments:
geometric Brownian motion, Ito calculus with Stratonovich convention
Recall extra drift
€
dx = u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + G(x)ξ (t)dt
= u(x) + 12 σ 2 ′ G (x)G(x)( )dt + σG(x)dW (t)
= rx + 12 σ 2x( )dt + σxdW (t)
d log x = rdt + σdW (t)
in our current notation
same as for Ito convention except r -> r + ½σ2
€
⇒ P(x) =1
x 2πσ 2texp −
log x − rt( )2
2σ 2t
⎡
⎣ ⎢ ⎢
⎤
⎦ ⎥ ⎥
€
d(x n ) = n r + 12 σ 2 + 1
2 σ 2(n −1)( )x ndt + nσx ndW
x n (t) = exp n r + 12 σ 2n( )t[ ] x(0) =1( )
moments:
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2give y a small
correlation time:
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2
y(t1)y(t2) = 12 σ 2γe−γ t1 −t2
give y a smallcorrelation time:
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2
y(t1)y(t2) = 12 σ 2γe−γ t1 −t2
x(t) = exp rt + y(t1)dt10
t
∫[ ], (x(0) =1)
give y a smallcorrelation time:
solve for x(t):
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2
y(t1)y(t2) = 12 σ 2γe−γ t1 −t2
x(t) = exp rt + y(t1)dt10
t
∫[ ], (x(0) =1)
eaz = exp − 12 a2 z2
( )⇒
give y a smallcorrelation time:
solve for x(t):use identity forGaussian variables:
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2
y(t1)y(t2) = 12 σ 2γe−γ t1 −t2
x(t) = exp rt + y(t1)dt10
t
∫[ ], (x(0) =1)
eaz = exp − 12 a2 z2
( )⇒
x 2(t) = exp 2rt + 2 y(t1)y(t2)0
t
∫ dt1dt20
t
∫[ ]
give y a smallcorrelation time:
solve for x(t):use identity forGaussian variables:
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2
y(t1)y(t2) = 12 σ 2γe−γ t1 −t2
x(t) = exp rt + y(t1)dt10
t
∫[ ], (x(0) =1)
eaz = exp − 12 a2 z2
( )⇒
x 2(t) = exp 2rt + 2 y(t1)y(t2)0
t
∫ dt1dt20
t
∫[ ]
= exp 2rt + σ 2γ e−γ t1 −t2
0
t
∫ dt1dt20
t
∫[ ]
give y a smallcorrelation time:
solve for x(t):use identity forGaussian variables:
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2
y(t1)y(t2) = 12 σ 2γe−γ t1 −t2
x(t) = exp rt + y(t1)dt10
t
∫[ ], (x(0) =1)
eaz = exp − 12 a2 z2
( )⇒
x 2(t) = exp 2rt + 2 y(t1)y(t2)0
t
∫ dt1dt20
t
∫[ ]
= exp 2rt + σ 2γ e−γ t1 −t2
0
t
∫ dt1dt20
t
∫[ ]
γ →0 ⏐ → ⏐ ⏐ exp 2rt + 2σ 2γt( )
give y a smallcorrelation time:
solve for x(t):use identity forGaussian variables:
GBM with Stratonovich, finite-τ noiseThis was based on the “midpoint prescription”. I claimed that thisprescription was equivalent to giving the noise a finite correlation time τ and letting τ -> 0 in the end. Here I show this for this model.
€
dx
dt= rx + yx;
dy
dt= −γy + ξ (t), ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = σ 2γ 2
y(t1)y(t2) = 12 σ 2γe−γ t1 −t2
x(t) = exp rt + y(t1)dt10
t
∫[ ], (x(0) =1)
eaz = exp − 12 a2 z2
( )⇒
x 2(t) = exp 2rt + 2 y(t1)y(t2)0
t
∫ dt1dt20
t
∫[ ]
= exp 2rt + σ 2γ e−γ t1 −t2
0
t
∫ dt1dt20
t
∫[ ]
γ →0 ⏐ → ⏐ ⏐ exp 2rt + 2σ 2γt( )
give y a smallcorrelation time:
solve for x(t):use identity forGaussian variables:
as we got before
GBM, Stratonovich, with Fokker-Planck
recall the FP equation with Stratonovich convention can be written
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
GBM, Stratonovich, with Fokker-Planck
recall the FP equation with Stratonovich convention can be written
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
= −∂
∂xrxP(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xx
∂
∂xxP(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
GBM, Stratonovich, with Fokker-Planck
recall the FP equation with Stratonovich convention can be written
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
= −∂
∂xrxP(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xx
∂
∂xxP(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
y = log x ⇒∂P (y, t)
∂t= −r
∂P
∂y+ 1
2 σ 2 ∂ 2P
∂y 2⇒change variables:
GBM, Stratonovich, with Fokker-Planck
recall the FP equation with Stratonovich convention can be written
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
= −∂
∂xrxP(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xx
∂
∂xxP(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
y = log x ⇒∂P (y, t)
∂t= −r
∂P
∂y+ 1
2 σ 2 ∂ 2P
∂y 2⇒
y(t) = rt, y(t) − y(t)( )2
= σ 2t
change variables:
y(t) is Gaussian with
GBM, Stratonovich, with Fokker-Planck
recall the FP equation with Stratonovich convention can be written
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
= −∂
∂xrxP(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂
∂xx
∂
∂xxP(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
y = log x ⇒∂P (y, t)
∂t= −r
∂P
∂y+ 1
2 σ 2 ∂ 2P
∂y 2⇒
y(t) = rt, y(t) − y(t)( )2
= σ 2t
change variables:
y(t) is Gaussian with
as obtained from working with differentials and using Ito’s lemma
GBM, Ito convention, using Fokker-Planck(Finally), the FP equation for the Ito convention
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂ 2
∂x 2G2(x)P(x, t)( )
GBM, Ito convention, using Fokker-Planck(Finally), the FP equation for the Ito convention
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂ 2
∂x 2G2(x)P(x, t)( )
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x) − 1
2 σ 2G(x) ′ G (x)( )P(x, t)[ ]12 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
can be written
GBM, Ito convention, using Fokker-Planck(Finally), the FP equation for the Ito convention
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂ 2
∂x 2G2(x)P(x, t)( )
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x) − 1
2 σ 2G(x) ′ G (x)( )P(x, t)[ ]12 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
= −∂
∂x(rx − 1
2 σ 2x)P(x, t)( ) + 12 σ 2 ∂
∂xx
∂
∂xxP(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
can be written
Here:
GBM, Ito convention, using Fokker-Planck(Finally), the FP equation for the Ito convention
€
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x)P(x, t)( ) + 1
2 σ 2 ∂ 2
∂x 2G2(x)P(x, t)( )
∂P
∂t= −
∂
∂xu(x) − 1
2 σ 2G(x) ′ G (x)( )P(x, t)[ ]12 σ 2 ∂
∂xG(x)
∂
∂xG(x)P(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
= −∂
∂x(rx − 1
2 σ 2x)P(x, t)( ) + 12 σ 2 ∂
∂xx
∂
∂xxP(x, t)( )
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟
can be written
Here:
But this is just the same equation as in the Stratonovich case, excpt for a reduced drift r - ½σ2, in agreement with what wefound using differentials and the Ito lemma.
Summary:
Both ways of treating the problem with the Ito convention (differentials + Ito’s lemma, FP) agree with each other.
Summary:
Both ways of treating the problem with the Ito convention (differentials + Ito’s lemma, FP) agree with each other.All ways of treating the problem with the Stratonovichconvention (differentials + midpoint correction + Ito’s lemma,finite-τ noise, FP) agree with each other.
Summary:
Both ways of treating the problem with the Ito convention (differentials + Ito’s lemma, FP) agree with each other.All ways of treating the problem with the Stratonovichconvention (differentials + midpoint correction + Ito’s lemma,finite-τ noise, FP) agree with each other.Ito and Stratonovich problems are different (Stratonovich hasa drift rate larger by ½σ2).
Summary:
Both ways of treating the problem with the Ito convention (differentials + Ito’s lemma, FP) agree with each other.All ways of treating the problem with the Stratonovichconvention (differentials + midpoint correction + Ito’s lemma,finite-τ noise, FP) agree with each other.Ito and Stratonovich problems are different (Stratonovich hasa drift rate larger by ½σ2).I have shown this here for GBM, but it is true in general (except for constant G(x), in which case Stratonovich and Ito are equivalent).
Perturbation theory for nonlinear Langevin equations
(now back to additive noise)
Perturbation theory for nonlinear Langevin equations
(now back to additive noise)Consider equations with a steady state, nonlinear F:
Perturbation theory for nonlinear Langevin equations
(now back to additive noise)Consider equations with a steady state, nonlinear F:
€
dx
dt= F(x) + ξ (t); ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = 2Tδ(t − ′ t )
Perturbation theory for nonlinear Langevin equations
(now back to additive noise)Consider equations with a steady state, nonlinear F:
Here I will concentrate on the example F(x) = -γx – gx3
overdamped motion in a quartic potential, double-wellpotential for γ < 0 :€
dx
dt= F(x) + ξ (t); ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = 2Tδ(t − ′ t )
Perturbation theory for nonlinear Langevin equations
(now back to additive noise)Consider equations with a steady state, nonlinear F:
Here I will concentrate on the example F(x) = -γx – gx3
overdamped motion in a quartic potential, double-wellpotential for γ < 0 :€
dx
dt= F(x) + ξ (t); ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = 2Tδ(t − ′ t )
€
dx
dt= −γx − gx 3 + ξ (t)
Perturbation theory for nonlinear Langevin equations
(now back to additive noise)Consider equations with a steady state, nonlinear F:
Here I will concentrate on the example F(x) = -γx – gx3
overdamped motion in a quartic potential, double-wellpotential for γ < 0 :
add an external driving force:
€
dx
dt= F(x) + ξ (t); ξ (t)ξ ( ′ t ) = 2Tδ(t − ′ t )
€
dx
dt= −γx − gx 3 + ξ (t)
€
dx
dt= −γx − gx 3 + ξ (t) + h(t)
some definitions and notation
Write this as
€
G0−1x = −gx 3 + ξ + h;
some definitions and notation
Write this as
€
G0−1x = −gx 3 + ξ + h;
G0 =d
dt+ γ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟−1where
some definitions and notation
Write this as
€
G0−1x = −gx 3 + ξ + h;
G0 =d
dt+ γ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟−1
G0(ω) =1
−iω + γ
where
some definitions and notation
Write this as
€
G0−1x = −gx 3 + ξ + h;
G0 =d
dt+ γ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟−1
G0(ω) =1
−iω + γG0(t, ′ t ) = e−γ (t− ′ t )Θ(t − ′ t )
where
some definitions and notation
Write this as
€
G0−1x = −gx 3 + ξ + h;
G0 =d
dt+ γ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟−1
G0(ω) =1
−iω + γG0(t, ′ t ) = e−γ (t− ′ t )Θ(t − ′ t )
x = G0 ⋅ −gx 3 + ξ + h[ ]
x(t) = d ′ t G0(t − ′ t ) −gx 3( ′ t ) + ξ ( ′ t ) + h( ′ t )[ ]∫
where
multiply by G0:
in time domain:
some definitions and notation
Write this as
€
G0−1x = −gx 3 + ξ + h;
G0 =d
dt+ γ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟−1
G0(ω) =1
−iω + γG0(t, ′ t ) = e−γ (t− ′ t )Θ(t − ′ t )
x = G0 ⋅ −gx 3 + ξ + h[ ]
x(t) = d ′ t G0(t − ′ t ) −gx 3( ′ t ) + ξ ( ′ t ) + h( ′ t )[ ]∫
x(ω) = G0(ω) −gd ′ ω
2π∫ d ′ ′ ω
2πx( ′ ω )x( ′ ′ ω )x(ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω ) + ξ (ω) + h(ω)
⎡ ⎣ ⎢
⎤ ⎦ ⎥
where
multiply by G0:
in time domain:
in frequency domain:
some definitions and notation
Write this as
€
G0−1x = −gx 3 + ξ + h;
G0 =d
dt+ γ
⎛
⎝ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟−1
G0(ω) =1
−iω + γG0(t, ′ t ) = e−γ (t− ′ t )Θ(t − ′ t )
x = G0 ⋅ −gx 3 + ξ + h[ ]
x(t) = d ′ t G0(t − ′ t ) −gx 3( ′ t ) + ξ ( ′ t ) + h( ′ t )[ ]∫
x(ω) = G0(ω) −gd ′ ω
2π∫ d ′ ′ ω
2πx( ′ ω )x( ′ ′ ω )x(ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω ) + ξ (ω) + h(ω)
⎡ ⎣ ⎢
⎤ ⎦ ⎥
( )t
∫ ≡ dt( )∫ ; ( )ω
∫ ≡dω
2π∫ ( )
where
multiply by G0:
in time domain:
in frequency domain:
notation:
iteration of equation of motion
Define
€
x0 = G0(ξ + h)
iteration of equation of motion
Define
equation of motion:
€
x0 = G0(ξ + h)
x = x0 − G0gx 3
iteration of equation of motion
Define
equation of motion:
€
x0 = G0(ξ + h)
x = x0 − G0gx 3 = x0 − gG0 x0 − G0gx 3( )
3
iteration of equation of motion
Define
equation of motion:
€
x0 = G0(ξ + h)
x = x0 − G0gx 3 = x0 − gG0 x0 − G0gx 3( )
3
= x0 − G0g x0 − gG0 x0 − gG0x 3( )[ ]
3L
iteration of equation of motion
Define
equation of motion:
diagrammatic representation: key:
€
x0 = G0(ξ + h)
x = x0 − G0gx 3 = x0 − gG0 x0 − G0gx 3( )
3
= x0 − G0g x0 − gG0 x0 − gG0x 3( )[ ]
3L
= +
: x0
: x
: G0
: -g
iterate diagrams:
= + 3
h
iterate diagrams:
= + 3
h: ξ
iterate diagrams:
= + 3
+9h
: ξ
h+ …
averaging over noise:Recall: To average products of arbitrary numbers of factors of noise,pair in all ways (Wick’s theorem)
averaging over noise:Recall: To average products of arbitrary numbers of factors of noise,pair in all ways (Wick’s theorem)
€
ξ(t1)ξ (t2)ξ (t3)ξ (t4 ) = ξ (t1)ξ (t2) ξ (t3)ξ (t4 )
+ ξ (t1)ξ (t3) ξ (t2)ξ (t4 )
+ ξ (t1)ξ (t4 ) ξ (t2)ξ (t3) etc.
averaging over noise:Recall: To average products of arbitrary numbers of factors of noise,pair in all ways (Wick’s theorem)
€
ξ(t1)ξ (t2)ξ (t3)ξ (t4 ) = ξ (t1)ξ (t2) ξ (t3)ξ (t4 )
+ ξ (t1)ξ (t3) ξ (t2)ξ (t4 )
+ ξ (t1)ξ (t4 ) ξ (t2)ξ (t3) etc.
€
G ≡δx
δh: G(t, ′ t ) =
δx(t)
δh( ′ t ), G(ω) =
dx(ω)
dh(ω)
Define the Green’s function
averaging over noise:Recall: To average products of arbitrary numbers of factors of noise,pair in all ways (Wick’s theorem)
€
ξ(t1)ξ (t2)ξ (t3)ξ (t4 ) = ξ (t1)ξ (t2) ξ (t3)ξ (t4 )
+ ξ (t1)ξ (t3) ξ (t2)ξ (t4 )
+ ξ (t1)ξ (t4 ) ξ (t2)ξ (t3) etc.
€
G ≡δx
δh: G(t, ′ t ) =
δx(t)
δh( ′ t ), G(ω) =
dx(ω)
dh(ω)
=
Define the Green’s function
averaging the diagrams:
= + 3
oo:
€
ξξ =2T
averaging the diagrams:
= + 3
+9
o
oo
o:
€
ξξ =2T
averaging the diagrams:
= + 3
+9
+18
o
oo
o
o+ …
o:
€
ξξ =2T
correlation function
o
€
C(ω) = G(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G(−ω)
correlation function
o
€
C(ω) = G(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G(−ω)
o
€
C0(ω) = G0(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G0(−ω)
=2T
ω2 + γ 2
in algebra,
= + 3
+9
+18
o
oo
o
o
+ …
€
G(ω) = G0(ω) + 3G0(ω) −g C0( ′ ω )′ ω
∫[ ]G0(ω)
+9G0(ω) −g C0( ′ ω )′ ω
∫[ ]G0(ω) −g C0( ′ ω )′ ω
∫[ ]G0(ω)
+18G0(ω) g2
′ ω ∫ C0( ′ ω )C0( ′ ′ ω )G0(ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω )
′ ′ ω ∫[ ]G0(ω) +L
“self-energy” (“mass operator”)
= +
+ + …
“self-energy” (“mass operator”)
= +
+ + …
= +
“self-energy” (“mass operator”)
= +
+ + …
= +
Dyson equation
€
G = G0 + G0ΣG
“self-energy” (“mass operator”)
= +
+ + …
= +
Dyson equation or
€
G = G0 + G0ΣG G = G0−1 − Σ( )
−1
“self-energy” (“mass operator”)
= +
+ + …
= +
Dyson equation or
€
G = G0 + G0ΣG G = G0−1 − Σ( )
−1
= 3 o
+ 6 oo
+ … Σ =
1st-order approximation
€
Σ(ω) = −3g C0( ′ ω ) + 6g2 C0( ′ ω )C0( ′ ′ ω )G (ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω )′ ′ ω
∫′ ω
∫′ ω
∫ +L
1st-order approximation
€
Σ(ω) = −3g C0( ′ ω ) + 6g2 C0( ′ ω )C0( ′ ′ ω )G (ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω )′ ′ ω
∫′ ω
∫′ ω
∫ +L
Σ(t − ′ t ) = −3gC0(t − ′ t = 0) + 6g2C02(t − ′ t )G0(t − ′ t ) +L
or, in time domain,
1st-order approximation
€
Σ(ω) = −3g C0( ′ ω ) + 6g2 C0( ′ ω )C0( ′ ′ ω )G (ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω )′ ′ ω
∫′ ω
∫′ ω
∫ +L
Σ(t − ′ t ) = −3gC0(t − ′ t = 0) + 6g2C02(t − ′ t )G0(t − ′ t ) +L
or, in time domain,
A simple, low-order approximation for Σ sums an infinitenumber of terms in the series for G.
1st-order approximation
€
Σ(ω) = −3g C0( ′ ω ) + 6g2 C0( ′ ω )C0( ′ ′ ω )G (ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω )′ ′ ω
∫′ ω
∫′ ω
∫ +L
Σ(t − ′ t ) = −3gC0(t − ′ t = 0) + 6g2C02(t − ′ t )G0(t − ′ t ) +L
or, in time domain,
A simple, low-order approximation for Σ sums an infinitenumber of terms in the series for G.
lowest-order approximation for Σ:
€
Σ=−3gC0(t = 0) = −3gT
1st-order approximation
€
Σ(ω) = −3g C0( ′ ω ) + 6g2 C0( ′ ω )C0( ′ ′ ω )G (ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω )′ ′ ω
∫′ ω
∫′ ω
∫ +L
Σ(t − ′ t ) = −3gC0(t − ′ t = 0) + 6g2C02(t − ′ t )G0(t − ′ t ) +L
or, in time domain,
A simple, low-order approximation for Σ sums an infinitenumber of terms in the series for G.
lowest-order approximation for Σ:
€
Σ=−3gC0(t = 0) = −3gT
G(ω) =1
−iω + γ + 3gT
1st-order approximation
€
Σ(ω) = −3g C0( ′ ω ) + 6g2 C0( ′ ω )C0( ′ ′ ω )G (ω − ′ ω − ′ ′ ω )′ ′ ω
∫′ ω
∫′ ω
∫ +L
Σ(t − ′ t ) = −3gC0(t − ′ t = 0) + 6g2C02(t − ′ t )G0(t − ′ t ) +L
or, in time domain,
A simple, low-order approximation for Σ sums an infinitenumber of terms in the series for G.
lowest-order approximation for Σ:
increase in damping constant:
€
Σ=−3gC0(t = 0) = −3gT
G(ω) =1
−iω + γ + 3gT
γ eff = γ + 3gT
Hartree approximation
Replace C0 and G0 in the expression for Σ by C and G.This sums up all self-energy insertions of this form on theinternal lines in the self-energy diagrams.
Hartree approximation
€
Σ=−3gC(t = 0)
Replace C0 and G0 in the expression for Σ by C and G.This sums up all self-energy insertions of this form on theinternal lines in the self-energy diagrams.
lowest-order approximation (Hartree):
Hartree approximation
€
Σ=−3gC(t = 0)
Replace C0 and G0 in the expression for Σ by C and G.This sums up all self-energy insertions of this form on theinternal lines in the self-energy diagrams.
lowest-order approximation (Hartree):
Σ = + + +
+ …
oo
o ooo
oo
oo
self-consistent solution
€
Σ=−3gdω
2πC(ω) = −3g
dω
2πG(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G(−ω)∫∫
self-consistent solution
€
Σ=−3gdω
2πC(ω) = −3g
dω
2πG(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G(−ω)∫∫
= −3gdω
2π∫ 1
−iω + γ − Σ⋅2T ⋅
1
iω + γ − Σ
self-consistent solution
€
Σ=−3gdω
2πC(ω) = −3g
dω
2πG(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G(−ω)∫∫
= −3gdω
2π∫ 1
−iω + γ − Σ⋅2T ⋅
1
iω + γ − Σ
Σ = −3gT
γ − Σ
self-consistent equation
self-consistent solution
€
Σ=−3gdω
2πC(ω) = −3g
dω
2πG(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G(−ω)∫∫
= −3gdω
2π∫ 1
−iω + γ − Σ⋅2T ⋅
1
iω + γ − Σ
Σ = −3gT
γ − Σ
Σ =γ − γ 2 +12gT
2= −3gT + O(g2)
self-consistent equation
solution:
self-consistent solution
€
Σ=−3gdω
2πC(ω) = −3g
dω
2πG(ω) ⋅2T ⋅G(−ω)∫∫
= −3gdω
2π∫ 1
−iω + γ − Σ⋅2T ⋅
1
iω + γ − Σ
Σ = −3gT
γ − Σ
Σ =γ − γ 2 +12gT
2= −3gT + O(g2)
self-consistent equation
solution:
This solution is approximate. But it is exact if x is a vector with ncomponents, with
in the limit n -> ∞.
€
dx
dt= −γx −
g
nx
2x + ξ (t)