Lecture 5: Biodiversity and Conservation of the Ocean;
Ecosystems Ecology, Productivity, and Trophic Structure
Slide 2
Biodiversity and Conservation of the Ocean
Slide 3
Marine Biogeography Biogeography = the study of the
geographical distribution and abundance of species through out the
ocean Present distribution of species is the result of speciation,
dispersal, and extinction Marine biota can be divided into
geographic provinces cec.org
Slide 4
Factors in Biodiversity Local patterns of species diversity are
often controlled by short-term ecological interactions Regional
patterns are probably controlled by the balance of speciation and
extinction Speciation (formation of new species) usually requires
some degree of isolation of populations Extinction can be caused by
habitat change or destruction, widespread diseases, biological
interactions, or random fluctuations of population size
Slide 5
ARCTIC ALEUTIAN OREGONIAN CALIFORNIAN 70N 60N 50N 40N 30N 1.
Pt. Barrow 2. Cape Romanzof 3. Nunivak Island 4. Hagemeister Island
5. Prince William Sound 6. Dixon Entrance 7. Vancouver Island 8.
Puget Sound 9. Cape Flattery 10. Cape Mendocino 11. Monterey Bay
12. Point Conception 13. Punta Eugenia 14. Cabo Sa n Lucas
Provinces (named in red) of the Pacific coast of North America
Slide 6
Establishment of Biogeographic Barriers Many coastal provinces
are maintained by barriers to dispersal (ex. currents), combined
with temperature breaks Larger scale barriers originate from
geological upheavals, resulting in isolation and speciation
Slide 7
Relating Geography to Evolutionary History The relation of
geography to speciation can be accomplished by relating
evolutionary trees to patterns of geographic occurrence
Slide 8
Relating Geography to Evolutionary History Importance of
barriers: different groups of evolutionarily related species found
on east and west side of the Pacific, resulting from long-term
geographic isolation; most closely related species found on either
side of Isthmus of Panama, which arose about 3 million years
ago
Slide 9
Within-species level - trace genetic markers and fossils show:
dispersal 3.5 million years ago from Pacific to Atlantic then
extinction by glaciers on Atlantic side in New England-Nova Scotia
18,000 years ago then re-colonization of this area from European
side of Atlantic about 4000 years ago Relating Geography to
Evolutionary History
Slide 10
Persistent boundary can isolate populations of several
species
Slide 11
Components of Species Diversity Alpha diversity () =
Within-habitat diversity Beta diversity () = Between-habitat
diversity. A contrast of diversity in two locales of differing
habitat type. Gamma diversity () = Regional diversity
Slide 12
Concepts of Species Diversity Diversity and stability Early
discussions of tropical vs. temperate; polluted vs. non- polluted
areas Diversity and productivity Recent discussions about a
possible relationship
Slide 13
Diversity Gradients Latitudinal diversity gradient - one of the
most pervasive gradients; number of species increases toward the
equator Gradient tends to apply to many taxonomic levels (species,
genus, etc.)
Slide 14
Latitudinal species richness gradients Ex. land birds
Slide 15
Slide 16
Factors Hypothesized to Influence Biodiversity (&
Latitudinal Gradients) FactorRationale HistoryMore time permits
more complete colonization and the evolution of new species Spatial
heterogeneityPhysiologically or biologically complex habitats
furnish more niches Competitiona.Competition favors reduced niche
breadth b.Competitive exclusion eliminates species
PredationPredation hampers competitive exclusion
ClimateClimatically favorable conditions permit more species
Climatic variabilityStability permits specialization
ProductivityRichness is limited by the partitioning of production
among species DisturbanceModerate disturbance hampers competitive
exclusion Source: Modified after Pianka (1988) and Currie
(1991)
Slide 17
Recent Explanations for Latitudinal Diversity Gradients
Increased area of the tropics Increased effective evolutionary time
due to shorter generation times in the topics
Slide 18
Other Diversity Differences Between-ocean differences: Pacific
biodiversity appears to be greater than Atlantic Within-ocean
differences: from a central high of biodiversity in the SW Pacific,
diversity declines with increasing latitude and less so with
increasing longitude, away from the center Inshore-estuarine
habitats: estuaries tend to be lower in diversity than open marine
habitats Deep-sea diversity increases, relative to comparable shelf
habitats, then decreases to abyssal depths
Slide 19
Explanations of Diversity Differences Area - greater area might
result in origin of more species (b/c of larger diversity of
habitats within a larger area), but also lower extinction rate of
species living over greater geographic ranges (b/c of higher
population sizes, and presence of more refuge habitats)
Slide 20
Slide 21
Effects of Area and Food Supply
Slide 22
Explanations of Diversity Differences Short-term ecological
interactions - presence of predators might enhance coexistence of
more competing species, competitor might drive inferior species to
a local extinction Complex recent historical events - may explain
some current regional differences in species diversity (e.g.,
diversity gradient in tropical American coral reefs may be
partially due to extinctions around periphery of province)
Slide 23
Explanations of Diversity Differences Habitat stability - a
stable habitat may reduce the rate of extinction, because species
could persist at smaller population sizes (possible explanation of
deep-sea maximum of species richness) Sea-level fluctuations - sea
level fluctuations, such as during the Pleistocene, might have
created barriers during low stands of sea level, leading to
isolation and speciation. This mechanism has been suggested as
increasing the number of species in the SW Pacific in coral reef
areas
Slide 24
Explanations of Diversity Differences Greater speciation rate -
might explain higher diversity in tropics; center of origin theory
argues that tropics are source of most new species, some of which
may migrate to higher latitudes Lower extinction rate - might also
explain major diversity gradients
Slide 25
Is There a Center of Origin? Center of Origin Hypothesis: high
diversity centers are places where more species are produced and
retained and also a source of colonization to peripheral regions
where diversity is lower
Slide 26
Within the Pacific Ocean, species diversity in coral reefs
declines in all directions from an Indo-Pacific diversity
maximum
Slide 27
Example of evidence supporting the center of origin theory:
Number of sea grass species with distance down-current from Torres
Straight
Slide 28
Jablonski et al.* looked at first fossil occurrences of members
of a genus in the fossil record First occurrences occur much more
frequently in tropics than at high latitude Conclude: Center of
Origin hypothesis is supported *D. Jablonski et al., Science 314,
102 -106 (2006) Fossil Record Evidence in Support of Center of
Origin Hypothesis
Slide 29
Research in Marine Biodiversity Understand patterns, processes,
and consequences of changing diversity in the sea by focusing on
the effects of human activities. Increase understanding of how
larger-scale oceanographic processes may impact smaller- scale
biodiversity patterns and processes. Strengthen field of marine
taxonomy. Encourage new technology, development of predictive
models, and look at things from historical perspectives. Improve
predictions concerning human impacts on the ocean.
Slide 30
Conserving Marine Biodiversity In many habitats the number of
species present is poorly known and severely underestimated Need
methods of recognizing species; morphology has limited use, but
molecular markers are being used commonly to distinguish among
species
Slide 31
Shifting Baselines Diversity & ecosystem structure today
may be strongly altered relative to a few human generations ago We
might mistakenly take todays situation as the baseline for
conservation The baseline for a natural community has shifted over
generations because we have forgotten the original natural
state
Slide 32
Conserving Marine Biodiversity: Value of Biodiversity Aesthetic
value of diverse ecosystems Many species play crucial roles in
elemental cycling Loss of species at apex of food chains has
drastic top- down effects on marine systems Loss of species that
are structural elements in communities (e.g., corals, seaweeds,
seagrasses) might cause loss of many more species More diverse
ecosystems may be more resilient, extinction of one species results
in expansion of ecological function by another species
Slide 33
Conservation Strategies Individual species - preserve abundance
of target species, such as large carnivores, marine mammals
Conserve total biodiversity of a region - focus on hotspots of high
diversity
Slide 34
Conservation Strategies Conserve ecosystem function - concern
is focused on species that are important in ecosystem processes
(such as primary production, nutrient cycling, decomposition)
higher biodiversity might enhance some functions, such as total
productivity Establish economic value of ecosystem by evaluating
its ecosystem services - ecosystems have human value that can be
quantified in money (resources, water supply, recreation,
etc.)
Slide 35
Conservation Strategies Marine Protected Areas (Marine
Reserves) Set aside a fraction of ecosystem area/volume to allow
populations to thrive and spill over into remaining unprotected
sites Population density, body size, biomass, biodiversity all
found to be higher within marine reserves
Slide 36
Marine Invasions Threat to Biodiversity Invasion = the arrival
of a species to an area that has not lived there previously
Increasing in frequency Often result in the arrival of species with
strong local ecological effects Eventually homogenize the biota
world-wide
Slide 37
Properties of Successful Invaders Vector - a means of transport
must be available, e.g., ballast water of ships, ability to
disperse (e.g., planktotrophic larvae) Invasion frequency - because
most arrivals do not result in invasion success, frequency of
arrival is important Ecological suitability of target habitat -
invading species need an appropriate habitat in which to colonize
and propagate Survival of initial population variation - initial
fluctuations of small population size results in extinction of
invading species
Slide 38
Methods of Invasion Ship ballast water Transport of
commercially exploited mariculture species Canals Biological
control Aquarium/Pet industry
Slide 39
Invaders Can Have Significant Effects Periwinkle Littorina
littorea Shore crab Carcinus maenas Freshwater zebra mussel,
Dreissena polymorpha
Slide 40
Invasion routes of species of the crab genus Carcinus maenas
from European waters to sites around the world
Slide 41
Ecosystems Ecology, Productivity, and Trophic Structure
Slide 42
Ecosystem Level Ecosystem = An entire habitat, including all
abiotic features of the landscape/seascape and all the living
species within it that interact Focus is on: Energy flux Biological
productivity Nutrient cycling
Productivity vs. Biomass Biomass is the mass of living material
present at any time, expressed as grams per unit area or volume
Productivity is the rate of production of living material per unit
time per unit area or volume
Slide 45
Productivity Primary productivity - productivity due to
photosynthesis Secondary productivity - productivity by the
consumers of primary producers
Slide 46
Productivity by Ecosystems per m 2
Slide 47
Productivity by Ecosystems Global Basis
Slide 48
Measuring Primary Productivity Gross primary productivity -
total carbon fixed during photosynthesis Net primary productivity -
total carbon fixed during photosynthesis minus that part which is
respired Most interesting gives that part of the production
available to higher trophic levels
Slide 49
Measuring Primary Productivity Remote Sensing Satellite color
scanners can give an estimate of photosynthetic pigment
concentration Relationship between chlorophyll concentration and
primary production varies with region Need ground-truthing to
determine relationship
Slide 50
Measuring Primary Productivity Remote Sensing
Slide 51
Satellite image of estimated chlorophyll in water column, from
SeaWiFS satellite (Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor) Measuring
Primary Productivity Remote Sensing Coccolithophore bloom from
space - satellite photograph
Slide 52
Geographic Variation of Productivity Continental shelf and
open-ocean upwelling areas are most productive Coastal areas are
nutrient-rich and productive Convergences and fronts often are
sites of rise of nutrient rich deep waters Central ocean, gyre
centers are nutrient poor, low primary production
Slide 53
Geographic Variation of Productivity
Slide 54
Why are ocean waters more productive in the higher latitudes
than in the lower latitudes? In higher latitudes, have seasonal
mixing (in winter) that occurs when thermocline breaks down towards
the end of fall. In lower latitudes, surface water temps remain
somewhat constant. Do not have seasonal breakdown of
thermocline.
Slide 55
Food Chains and Food Webs Trophic level a species or group of
species that feed on one or more other species (which can be
grouped into a lower trophic level) Food chain - linear sequence
showing which organisms consume which other organisms, making a
series of trophic levels Food web - more complex diagram showing
feeding relationships among organisms, not restricted to a linear
hierarchy
Slide 56
Trophic Levels Defines how far an organism is removed from the
producer in obtaining its nourishment Producers-always trophic
level 1 Herbivores-always trophic level 2 Higher order consumers
may occupy different trophic levels depending on what they are
feeding on at any point in time
Slide 57
Trophic Levels Primary Producers Phytoplankton and macrophytes
Consumers: heterotrophic animals Primary consumers: herbivores
Secondary and higher-level consumers: carnivores, predators
Decomposers: bacteria and fungi Trophic level Name 4 Top carnivore
3 Carnivore 2 Herbivore 1 Autotroph
Slide 58
Food Chains The energy flow from one trophic level to the other
is known as a food chain It involves one organism at each trophic
level Primary Consumers eat autotrophs (producers) Secondary
Consumers eat the primary consumers Tertiary Consumers eat the
secondary consumers Decomposers bacteria and fungi that break down
dead organisms and recycle the material back into the
environment
Slide 59
Simplified food chain taken from a food web
Slide 60
Food Chains The total number of links in a food chain may be
limited by: 1. the structure of the food chain 2. the possible
energy that can be transported through many links 3. possible
instability of large food chains Unusual to find more than 4-5
trophic levels in food chains
Slide 61
Food Chains - Structure Bottom up control: control of food
chain by amount of primary production Top-down control: control of
food chain by variation in top predators Three-level food chains:
Primary producers will be abundant because the herbivore population
is reduced by the carnivores Remove top level (carnivore) and
herbivore increases, resulting in low population size of primary
producer. Even-numbered food chains: Primary producers tend to be
rare
Slide 62
Food Chains - Energy Transfer Trophic Hypothesis there is a
maximum number of trophic links through which energy can travel
With ecological efficiency of 10%, only 0.01% will reach a 5 th
trophic level May set a limit to upper trophic levels bottom- up
control
Slide 63
Food Chains - Stability Food Chain Stability Hypothesis Longer
food chains are inherently unstable Changes at one level will
propagate to other levels If a population at one trophic level goes
extinct, it will cause species at levels above it to go extinct
Omnivory feeding on many food sources (i.e. different trophic
levels) Reduces effects of fluctuations of a species in a given
level of a food chain
Slide 64
Food Webs Community food web is a description of feeding habits
of a set of organisms based on taxonomy, location or other criteria
Rule: The more intricate the food web the more stable the
ecosystem
Slide 65
Food Webs Food webs portray flows of matter and energy within
the community If community is like a city, then Food Web is like a
street map of a city Web omits some information about community
properties e.g., minor energy flows, constraints on predation,
population dynamics
Slide 66
Descriptive Food Webs
Slide 67
Interaction or functional food webs depict the most influential
link or dynamic in the community
Slide 68
Food Webs: Methods of Study 1.Identify component species
2.Sample to determine who is eating whom 3.Sampling and gut
analysis to quantify frequency of encounters 4.Exclosures and
removals of species to determine net effects 5.Stable isotopes
6.Mathematical models
Slide 69
Food Web Analysis Modern Approaches to Food Web Analysis
Connectivity relationships Importance of predators and interaction
strength in altering community composition and dynamics
Identification of trophic pathways via isotope analysis. Weakness
of above: no quantitative measure of food web linkages.
Slide 70
Food Webs: Complexity meets Reality Fallacy of linear food
chains as a adequate description of natural food webs Food webs are
reticulate Discrete homogeneous trophic levels an abstraction or an
idealism omnivory is rampant ontogenetic diet shifts (sometimes
called life history omnivory) environmental diet shifts spatial
& temporal heterogeneity in diet
Slide 71
Energy Flow Through Ecosystems Energy transfer between trophic
levels is not 100% efficient, and energy is lost as it passes up a
food chain. Herbivores eat a small proportion of total plant
biomass They use a small proportion of plant material consumed for
their growth. The rest is lost in feces or respiration Less energy
is available at the next trophic level.
Slide 72
Trophic Basis of Production Assimilation efficiency varies with
resource 10% for vascular plant detritus 30% for diatoms and
filamentous algae 50% for fungi 70% for animals 50% for microbes
(bacteria and protozoans) 27% for amorphous detritus Net Production
Efficiency production/assimilation ~ 40%
Slide 73
Food Webs & Efficiency Ecological efficiency is defined as
the energy supply available to trophic level N + 1, divided by the
energy consumed by trophic level N. You might think of it as the
efficiency of copepods at converting plants into fish food. In
general, only about 10% of the energy consumed by one level is
available to the next. Difficult to measure so food web scientists
focus on measures of transfer efficiency for selected groups of
animals.
Slide 74
Food Web Transfer Efficiency E t = P t / P t-1 Where: P t = The
annual production at trophic level t P t-1 = The annual production
at the lower trophic level
Slide 75
Transfer Between Trophic Levels Budget for ingested food (use
energy units): I = E + R + G I amount ingested E amount egested R
amount respired G growth (partitioned between somatic growth and
reproduction) **usually constructed in terms of energy units (e.g.
calories)
Slide 76
Transfer Between Trophic Levels Use food chain efficiency to
calculate Potential production at highest trophic level: P = BE n B
= primary production P = production at highest level E = food chain
efficiency n = number of links between trophic levels
Slide 77
Food Webs and Energy Pyramid of biomass represents the amount
of energy, fixed in biomass, at different trophic levels for a
given point in time
Slide 78
Food Webs in the Ocean Pyramid of biomass for the oceans can
appear inverted Pyramid of energy shows rates of production rather
than biomass.
Slide 79
Marine Food Webs Food webs in the oceans vary systematically in
food chain efficiency, number of trophic levels, and primary
production Oceanic system Coastal/Shelf system Upwelling
Slide 80
Marine Food Webs Food Chain Type Primary Productivity gCm -2 y
-1 Trophic Levels Food Chain Efficiency Potential Fish Production
mgCm -2 y -1 Oceanic505100.5 Coastal/Shelf100315340
Upwelling3001.22036,000 After Ryther, 1969 Science 166: 72-76.
Slide 81
Variation in Planktonic Food Webs Oceanic Coastal/Shelf
Upwelling
Slide 82
Marine Food Webs Great potential of upwelling areas due to
combination of: High primary production (have high and continuous
nutrient supply) Higher food chain efficiency (related to ease of
ingestion and assimilation of large diatoms by planktivorous fish)
Lower number of trophic levels (less overall loss of energy)
Slide 83
Are trophic levels useful? Even if organisms are not strict
herbivores, primary carnivores, etc., as long as they are mostly
feeding at one trophic level, the concept can have value (e.g.,
trophic cascade concept).