6
– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main – Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr. Andreas Podelski, Dr. Bernd Westphal Albert-Ludwigs-Universit¨ at Freiburg, Germany Motivation and Context – 1 – 2015-10-20 – main – 2/36 Recall: Model – 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation – 5/36 Definition. [Folk] A model is an abstract, formal, mathematical representation or description of structure or behaviour of a (software) system. Definition. (Glinz, 2008, 425) A model is a concrete or mental image (Abbild) of something or a concrete or mental archetype (Vorbild) for something. Three properties are constituent: (i) the image attribute (Abbildungsmerkmal), i.e. there is an entity (called original) whose image or archetype the model is, (ii) the reduction attribute (Verk¨ urzungsmerkmal), i.e. only those attributes of the original that are relevant in the modelling context are represented, (iii) the pragmatic attribute, i.e. the model is built in a specific context for a specific purpose.

Lecture 1: Introduction - swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de · –1–2015-10-20–main– Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lecture 1: Introduction - swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de · –1–2015-10-20–main– Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main –

Softw

are

Desig

n,

Modellin

gand

Analysis

inU

ML

Lectu

re1:

Intro

ductio

n

20

15

-10

-20

Prof.Dr.Andreas

Podelski,

Dr.

BerndW

estp

hal

Albert-L

udwigs-U

niversitat

Freib

urg,

Germ

any

Mo

tivatio

na

nd

Co

ntext

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main –

2/36

Reca

ll:M

odel

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

5/36

Definitio

n.[Folk]A

model

isan

abstract,

formal,

math

ematical

represen

tation

ordescrip

tionofstru

cture

orbehavio

urofa(so

ftware)

system.

Definitio

n.(G

linz,

2008,425)

Amodel

isaconcrete

ormental

imag

e(A

bbild

)ofsometh

ing

oraconcrete

ormental

archetyp

e(V

orbild

)for

someth

ing.

Three

properties

areconstitu

ent:

(i)theim

ageattrib

ute

(Abbild

ungsm

erkmal),

i.e.there

isan

entity

(calledorig

inal)

whose

imag

eor

archetyp

ethemodel

is,

(ii)thered

uctio

nattrib

ute

(Verk

urzu

ngsm

erkmal),

i.e.only

those

attributes

oftheorig

inal

that

arerelevan

tin

themodellin

gcontext

arerep

resented

,

(iii)theprag

matic

attribute,

i.e.themodel

isbuilt

inaspecifi

ccontext

fora

specifi

cpurpose.

Page 2: Lecture 1: Introduction - swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de · –1–2015-10-20–main– Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr

On

eS

oftw

are

Mo

dellin

gL

an

gu

age:

UM

L(O

MG

,2

01

1b,

69

4)

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

8/36

Dia

gra

m

Stru

ctu

reD

iag

ram

Be

ha

vio

rD

iag

ram

Inte

rac

tion

Dia

gra

m

Us

e C

as

eD

iag

ram

Ac

tivity

Dia

gra

m

Co

mp

os

iteS

truc

ture

Dia

gra

m

Cla

ss

Dia

gra

mC

om

po

ne

nt

Dia

gra

m

De

plo

yme

nt

Dia

gra

m

Se

qu

en

ce

Dia

gra

m

Inte

rac

tion

Ov

erv

iew

Dia

gra

m

Ob

jec

tD

iag

ram

Sta

te M

ac

hin

eD

iag

ram

Pa

ck

ag

eD

iag

ram

Co

mm

un

ica

tion

Dia

gra

mT

imin

gD

iag

ram

Pro

file D

iag

ram

OCL

DobingandParso

ns(2006)

(Ou

r)P

remises

for

Usin

ga

So

ftwa

reM

od

elling

La

ng

uage

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

9/36

:C

s3

Dx:Int

E/

(i)Wewan

tto

know

how

theword

softhelan

guag

elooklike

:Syntax.

(InUML:when

isadiagram

aproper

state

mach

ine?)

(Ou

r)P

remises

for

Usin

ga

So

ftwa

reM

od

elling

La

ng

uage

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

9/36

:C

s3

Dx:Int

E/

✘(i)

Wewan

tto

know

how

theword

softhelan

guag

elooklike

:Syntax.

(InUML:when

isadiagram

aproper

state

mach

ine?)

(Ou

r)P

remises

for

Usin

ga

So

ftwa

reM

od

elling

La

ng

uage

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

9/36

:C

s3

Dx:Int

E/

s1

s2

s3

s8

s4

s5

s6

E/F/

F/

E/

G/

s7

[true]/

F/

✘(i)

Wewan

tto

know

how

theword

softhelan

guag

elooklike

:Syntax.

(InUML:when

isadiagram

aproper

state

mach

ine?)

(ii)Wewan

tto

know

what

aword

ofthelan

guag

emeans:

Semantics.

(InUML:cansen

dingeven

tE

andthen

Gkill

theobject?

)

→then

wecan

formally

analyse

themodel,

e.g.,

prove

that

thedesig

nsatisfi

esthereq

uirem

ents,

simulate

themodel,

automatically

generate

testcases,

generate

code,

etc.

•UMLissometim

es(neutrally,

oras

offence)

called“semi-fo

rmal”:

theUMLstan

dard

OMG

(2011a,b

)isstro

ngon(i),

butweak

(er)on(ii).

(“thediagram

isself-exp

lanatory”

,“everyb

odyundersta

ndsthediagram”—

No.)

•In

thelectu

re:stu

dythe(!)

syntax,defineone(!)

semantics.

Page 3: Lecture 1: Introduction - swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de · –1–2015-10-20–main– Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr

Our?

Flo

orp

lan

Modes!

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

10/36

Ske

tch:

Blueprin

t:Program:

+wirin

gplan+

windows

+...

Khoshnevis (2004)

With

UMLit’s

thesam

e[ http://martinfowler.com/bliki]:

“[...]

peo

ple

differ

aboutwhatshould

bein

theUMLbe-

cause

there

aredifferin

gfundamentalvie

wsaboutwhat

theUMLshould

be.

Sowhen

someo

neelse’s

viewoftheUML

seemsrather

differen

tto

yours,

itmay

bebeca

use

they

use

adifferen

tUmlM

odeto

you.”

Our?

Flo

orp

lan

Modes!

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

10/36

Ske

tch:

Blueprin

t:Program:

+wirin

gplan+

windows

+...

Khoshnevis (2004)

With

UMLit’s

thesam

e[ http://martinfowler.com/bliki]:

“[...]

peo

ple

differ

aboutwhatshould

bein

theUMLbe-

cause

there

aredifferin

gfundamentalvie

wsaboutwhat

theUMLshould

be.

Sowhen

someo

neelse’s

viewoftheUML

seemsrather

differen

tto

yours,

itmay

bebeca

use

they

use

adifferen

tUmlM

odeto

you.”

Ske

tch

Inthis

UmlM

odedevelo

pers

use

theUML

tohelp

communica

tesomeaspects

ofasystem

.[...]

Sketch

esare

also

usefu

lin

doc-

umen

ts,in

which

case

thefocu

sis

communica

tionra-ther

than

completen

ess.[...]

Thetools

used

forsketch

ingare

lightw

eightdraw

ingtoolsandof-

tenpeo

ple

aren’t

tooparticu

laraboutkeep

ingto

everystrict

rule

oftheUML.

Most

UML

diagrams

shown

inbooks,

such

as

mine,

aresketch

es.Their

emphasis

ison

selectiveco

mmunica

tion

rather

thanco

mplete

specifi

catio

n.

Hen

cemysound-bite

“co

mpre-

hen

siveness

istheen

emyofco

m-

preh

ensib

ility”

Blueprin

t

[...]In

forw

arden

gineerin

gthe

idea

isthatblueprin

tsare

devel-

oped

byadesig

ner

whose

jobis

tobuild

adeta

ileddesig

nfora

programmer

toco

deup.

That

desig

nshould

be

suffi-

ciently

complete

thatalldesig

ndecisio

nsare

laid

outand

the

programming

should

follo

was

apretty

straightfo

rward

activity

thatreq

uires

littlethought.

[...]

Blueprin

tsreq

uire

much

more

sophistica

tedtoolsthansketch

esin

order

tohandle

thedeta

ilsre-

quired

forthetask.[...]

Forw

arden

gineerin

gtools

sup-

port

diagram

draw

ingandback

itup

with

arep

osito

ryto

hold

theinform

atio

n.[...]

ProgrammingLanguage

Ifyou

can

deta

ilthe

UML

enough,and

provid

esem

antics

foreveryth

ingyouneed

insoft-

ware,

youcanmake

theUMLbe

yourprogramminglanguage.

Tools

can

take

the

UML

di-

agrams

you

draw

and

compile

them

into

executable

code.

Thepromise

ofthisisthatUML

isa

higher

levellanguage

and

thusmore

productive

thancu

r-ren

tprogramminglanguages.

The

questio

n,

of

course,

iswheth

erthis

promise

istru

e.

Idon’t

believe

that

graphica

l

programming

will

succeed

just

beca

use

it’sgraphica

l.[...]

UM

L-M

ode

of

the

Course

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Smotivation –

11/36

The“mode”

fittin

gthelectu

rebest

isAsB

lueprin

t.

Aim

oftheCourse

:

•show

that

UMLcan

beprecise

—to

avo

idmisu

ndersta

ndings.

•allow

form

alanalysis

ofmodels

onthedesig

nleve

l—

tofinderro

rsearly.

•becon

sistentwith

(inform

alsem

antics

in)OMG

(2011b)as

faras

possib

le.

SideEffects:

After

thecou

rse,you

shou

ld...

•have

ago

odworkin

gkn

owled

geof

UML,

•have

ago

odworkin

gkn

owled

geof

software

modellin

g,

•beable

toeffi

ciently

andeff

ectivelywork

inAsS

ketch

mode,

•beable

todefineyo

urownUMLsem

antics

foryo

urcon

text/purpose,

ordefineyou

row

nDomain

Specifi

cLanguagesas

need

ed.

Th

eL

ecture:

Co

nten

ta

nd

No

n-C

on

tent

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main –

12/36

Course

Map

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Scontent –

13/36

VendingM

achine

Water_enabled : int

Soft_enabled : int

Tea_enabled : int

+disable_all():void

+enable_W

ater():void+

enable_Soft():void

+enable_Tea():void

+W

AT

ER

()+

SO

FT

()+

TE

A()

+C

hoicePanel()

:ChoicePanel

1

+giveback_100():void

+giveback_50():void

:Changer

1

+P

repare_Water():void

+P

repare_Soft():void

+P

repare_Tea():void+

DW

AT

ER

()+

DT

EA

()+

DS

OF

T()

+F

ILLUP

()

:DrinkD

ispenser1

+fallthrough():void

+update_C

hoicePanel()

+C

50()+

E1()

+O

K()

:CoinV

alidator1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Idle

waitO

K

have_c100_or_e1>

have_c100

have_e1

have_c150>have_c50>

drinkReady

Idle

waitO

K

have_c100_or_e1>

have_c100

have_e1

have_c150>have_c50>

drinkReady

E1/itsC

hanger->

giveback_100()

C50/itsC

hoicePanel->

enable_Water();

E1/

itsChanger

->giveback_100()

C50

C50/

itsChanger

->giveback_50()

C50

E1/itsC

hoicePanel->enableSoft();

E1

C50

OK

Entry A

ction:itsC

hoicePanel->

enable_Water();

Entry A

ction:itsC

hoicePanel->

enable_Soft();

Entry A

ction:itsC

hoicePanel->

enable_Tea();

Tea_selected

InactiveSoft_selected

Water_selected

Request_sent

Tea_selected

InactiveSoft_selected

Water_selected

Request_sent

TE

A[Tea_enabled]

/itsDrinkD

ispenser->

GE

N(D

TE

A)

/itsDrinkD

ispenser->

GE

N(D

SOFT

);if (itsC

oinValidator

->IS_IN

(have_c150))itsC

hanger->giveback_50();

WA

TE

R[W

ater_enabled]

/disable_all();

SOFT

[Soft_enabled]

/itsDrinkD

ispenser->

GE

N(D

WA

TE

R);

if (itsCoinV

alidator->IS_IN

(have_c150))itsC

hanger->giveback_100();

else if (itsCoinV

alidator->IS_IN

(have_c100))itsC

hanger->giveback_50();

onon

T2

Tea_outT

1T

3

S2Soft_out

S1S3

W2

Water_out

W1

W3

FillingUp

on

T2

Tea_outT

1T

3

S2Soft_out

S1S3

W2

Water_out

W1

W3

FillingUp

DT

EA

/Prepare_Tea();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DT

EA

/Prepare_Tea();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DT

EA

/Prepare_Tea();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DSO

FT/

Prepare_Soft();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DSO

FT/

Prepare_Soft();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DSO

FT/

Prepare_Soft();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DW

AT

ER

/Prepare_W

ater();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DW

AT

ER

/Prepare_W

ater();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

);

DW

AT

ER

/Prepare_W

ater();itsC

oinValidator

->G

EN

(OK

); FILL

UP/itsC

oinValidator

->update_C

hoicePanel();

LSC:

buywater

AC:

true

AM:

invarian

tI:

strict

User

Coin

Valid

atorChoiceP

anel

Disp

enser

C50

pWATER

waterin

stock

dWATER

OK

UML

ModelInstances

NS

WE

CD,SM

S=

(T,C,V

,atr),

SM

M=

(ΣDS,A

S,→

SM)

ϕ∈

OCL

expr

CD,SD

S,S

D

B=

(QSD,q

0 ,AS,→

SD,F

SD)

π=

(σ0 ,ε

0 )(cons0,Snd0)

−−−−−−−−→

u0

(σ1 ,ε

1 )···

wπ=

((σi ,co

nsi ,S

ndi ))

i∈N

G=

(N,E

,f)

Mathematics

OD

UML

Table

of

Conten

ts

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Scontent –

14/36

•Intro

ductio

n(V

L01)

•Sem

antical

Domain

(VL01–02)

Modellin

gStru

cture:

•OCL

(VL03–04)

•Object

Diag

rams

(VL05)

•Class

Diag

rams

(VL06–09)

•Modellin

gGuidelin

es(V

L10)

Modellin

gBehaviour:

•Constru

ctive:

Sim

ple

State

Mach

ines

(VL11–13)

Hierarch

icalState

Mach

ines

(VL14–15)

CodeGeneratio

n(V

L16)

•Reflectiv

e:

Live

Sequence

Charts

(VL17–18)

TheRest:

•Inheritan

ce(V

L19–20)

•Meta-M

odelin

g(V

L21)

•Puttin

gitall

togeth

er:MDA,MDSE

(VL22)

Page 4: Lecture 1: Introduction - swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de · –1–2015-10-20–main– Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr

Table

of

Non-C

onten

ts

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Scontent –

15/36

Everythingelse

,inclu

ding

•Deve

lopmentProcess

UMLison

lythelan

guage

forartefacts.

But:

we’ll

discu

ssexem

plarily,

where

inan

abstract

develop

mentpro

cesswhich

mean

scou

ldbeused

.

•How

toco

meupwith

agooddesig

nUMLison

lythelan

guage

towrite

dow

ndesign

s.But:

we’ll

have

acou

ple

ofexam

ples.

•Arte

fact

Management

Version

ing,

Traceab

ility,Prop

agationof

Changes.

•Eve

rylittle

bit

andpiece

ofUML

Borin

g.Instead

welearn

how

toread

thestan

dard

.

•Object

Orie

ntedProgramming

Interestin

g:inheritan

ceison

eof

thelast

lectures.

Fo

rma

lia

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main –

16/36

Form

alia

:L

ectures

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Sformalia –

17/36

•Lectu

rer:

Dr.Bern

dWestp

hal

•Support:

Milan

Vujin

ovic

•Homepage:http://swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/teaching/WS2015-16/sdmauml

•Tim

e/Loca

tion:Tuesd

ay,Thursd

ay,10:00–12:00/here

(build

ing51,room

03-026)

•Course

language:English

(slides/

writin

g,presen

tation,questio

ns/discu

ssions)

•Presentatio

n:

half

slides/

half

on-screen

hand-w

riting—

forreaso

ns

•Scrip

t/Media:

•slid

eswith

annotatio

nsonhomepage,

typically

soonafte

rthelectu

re

•record

ingonILIASwith

max.

1week

delay

(linksonhomepage)

•Break:

•We’ll

have

a10min.breakin

themiddle

ofeach

eventfro

mnow

on,

unless

amajority

objects

now.

Form

alia

:E

xercisesand

Tuto

rials

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Sformalia –

18/36

•Youshould

work

ingroupsofapprox.3,clearly

give

namesonsubmissio

n.

•Please

submitvia

ILIAS(cf.

homepag

e);papersubmissio

nsare

tolerated.

•Sch

edule:

Week

N,

Thursd

ay,10–12Lectu

reA1(exercise

sheet

Aonlin

e)

Week

N+

1,

Tuesd

ay10–12Lectu

reA2

Thursd

ay10–12Lectu

reA3

Week

N+

2,

Monday,

12:00

(exercisesA

early

submissio

n)

Tuesd

ay,10:00

(exercisesA

late

submissio

n)

10–12Tutoria

lA

Thursd

ay10–12Lectu

reB1(exercise

sheet

Bonlin

e)

•Ratin

gsyste

m:“most

complicated

ratingsystem

ever”

•Admissio

npoints

(good-w

illratin

g,upper

bound)

(“rea

sonable

proposalgiven

studen

t’sknowled

gebefore

tutoria

l”)

•Exa

m-like

points

(evilratin

g,lower

bound)

(“rea

sonable

proposalgiven

studen

t’sknowled

geafte

rtutoria

l”)

10%

bonusfor

early

submissio

n.

•Tutoria

l:Plen

ary,notreco

rded.

•Togeth

erdevelo

ponegoodsolutio

nbased

onselectio

nofearly

submissio

ns

(anonym

ous)

—there

isno“Musterlo

sung”for

modellin

gtask

s.

Form

alia

:E

xam

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Sformalia –

19/36

•Exam

Admissio

n:

Achievin

g50%

ofthereg

ular

admissio

npoints

intotal

issufficie

ntfor

admissio

nto

exam.

Typ

ically,20reg

ular

admissio

npoints

per

exercisesheet.

•Exam

Form

:

•oral

forBScan

donspecial

dem

and(E

rasmus),

•writte

nfor

everybodyelse

(ifsufficien

tlyman

ycan

didates

remain

).

Scores

from

theexercises

donotcontrib

ute

tothefinal

grad

e.

•Exam

Date:

Rem

indmein

earlyDecem

ber

that

weneed

toag

reeonan

examdate.

User’s

Guid

e

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Sformalia –

20/36

•Approach

:

Thelectu

resissupposed

towork

asalectu

re:sp

oke

nword

+slid

es+

discu

ssion

Itisnotourgoalto

make

anyof

thethree

work

inisolation

.

•Interactio

n:

Absen

ceoften

moan

edbutit

take

stw

o:please

ask/co

mmentim

mediately.

•Exe

rcisesubmissio

ns:

Each

taskisatin

ylittle

scientifi

cwork:

(i)Briefl

yrep

hrase

thetask

inyourow

nword

s.

(ii)State

yourclaim

edsolutio

n.

(iii)Convin

ceyourread

erthat

yourproposal

isasolutio

n(proofs

arevery

convin

cing).

Page 5: Lecture 1: Introduction - swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de · –1–2015-10-20–main– Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr

User’s

Guid

e

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Sformalia –

20/36

•Approach

:

Thelectu

resissupposed

towork

asalectu

re:sp

oke

nword

+slid

es+

discu

ssion

Itisnotourgoalto

make

anyof

thethree

work

inisolation

.

•Interactio

n:

Absen

ceoften

moan

edbutit

take

stw

o:please

ask/co

mmentim

mediately.

•Exe

rcisesubmissio

ns:

Each

taskisatin

ylittle

scientifi

cwork:

(i)Briefl

yrep

hrase

thetask

inyourow

nword

s.

(ii)State

yourclaim

edsolutio

n.

(iii)Convin

ceyourread

erthat

yourproposal

isasolutio

n(proofs

arevery

convin

cing).

Exa

mple:

Task:Given

asquare

with

sidelen

gth

a=

19.1.What

isthelen

gth

ofthe

longest

straightlin

efully

insid

ethesquare?

Submissio

nA:

Submissio

nB:

27

The

length

ofthe

longest

straight

linefully

insid

ethesquare

with

side

length

a=

19.1

is27.01(ro

unded

).

Thelongest

straightlin

einsid

ethe

square

isthediagonal.

ByPyth

ago-

ras,its

length

is√a2+

a2.Insertin

ga=

19.1

yields27.01(ro

unded

).

User’s

Guid

e

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Sformalia –

20/36

•Approach

:

Thelectu

resissupposed

towork

asalectu

re:sp

oke

nword

+slid

es+

discu

ssion

Itisnotourgoalto

make

anyof

thethree

work

inisolation

.

•Interactio

n:

Absen

ceoften

moan

edbutit

take

stw

o:please

ask/co

mmentim

mediately.

•Exe

rcisesubmissio

ns:

Each

taskisatin

ylittle

scientifi

cwork:

(i)Briefl

yrep

hrase

thetask

inyourow

nword

s.

(ii)State

yourclaim

edsolutio

n.

(iii)Convin

ceyourread

erthat

yourproposal

isasolutio

n(proofs

arevery

convin

cing).

Exa

mple:

Task:Given

asquare

with

sidelen

gth

a=

19.1.What

isthelen

gth

ofthe

longest

straightlin

efully

insid

ethesquare?

Submissio

nA:

Submissio

nB:

27

The

length

ofthe

longest

straight

linefully

insid

ethesquare

with

side

length

a=

19.1

is27.01(ro

unded

).

Thelongest

straightlin

einsid

ethe

square

isthediagonal.

ByPyth

ago-

ras,its

length

is√a2+

a2.Insertin

ga=

19.1

yields27.01(ro

unded

).✘

✔L

iteratu

re

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main –

21/36

Litera

ture:

Modellin

g

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Slit –

22/36

•W.Hesse,

H.C.Mayr:

Modellieru

ngin

der

Soft-

waretech

nik:ein

eBestan

dsau

fnah

me,

Inform

atikSpektru

m,31(5):3

77-393,2008.

•O.Pastor,

S.Espan

a,J.

I.Pan

ach,N.Aquino:

Model-D

rivenDevelo

pment,

Inform

atikSpektru

m,31(5):3

94-407,2008.

•M.

Glin

z:Modellieru

ng

inder

Lehre

anHochsch

ulen

:Thesen

undErfah

rungen,

Inform

atikSpektru

m,31(5):4

08-424,2008.

http://www.springerlink.com/content/0170-6012

•U.Kasten

s,H.Klein

eBuning:Modellieru

ng–Grundlag

enundForm

aleMeth

oden,2.

Auflag

e,Han

ser-Verlag

,2008.

Litera

ture:

UM

L

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – Slit –

23/36

•OMG:Unified

Modelin

gLangu

ageSpecifi

cation,Infrastru

cture,

2.4.1

•OMG:Unified

Modelin

gLangu

ageSpecifi

cation,Superstru

cture,

2.4.1

•OMG:Object

Con

straintLangu

ageSpecifi

cation,2.0

Allthree:

http://www.omg.org(cf.

hyp

erlinks

oncou

rsehom

epage)

•A.Klep

pe,

J.Warm

er:TheObject

Con

straintLangu

age,Secon

dEdition

,Addison

-Wesley,

2003.

•D.Harel,

E.Gery:

Execu

table

Object

Modelin

gwith

Statech

arts,IEEECom

puter,

30(7):31-42,1997.

•B.P.Dou

glass:Doin

gHard

Tim

e,Addison

-Wesley,

1999.

•B.P.Dou

glass:ROPES:Rapid

Object-O

riented

Process

forEmbedded

System

s,i-L

ogixInc.,

Whitep

aper,

1999.

•B.Oesterreich

:Analyse

undDesign

mitUML2.1,

8.Auflage,

Oldenbou

rg,2006.

•H.Stoerrle:

UML2furStudenten

,Pearson

Studium

Verlag,

2005.

Referen

ces

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main –

35/36

Page 6: Lecture 1: Introduction - swt.informatik.uni-freiburg.de · –1–2015-10-20–main– Software Design, Modelling and Analysis in UML Lecture 1: Introduction 2015-10-20 Prof. Dr

Referen

ces

– 1 – 2015-10-20 – main –

36/36

Dobing,B.an

dParso

ns,

J.(2006).

How

UMLisused

.Communicatio

nsoftheACM,

49(5):1

09–114.

Glin

z,M.(2008).

Modellieru

ngin

der

Lehre

anHochsch

ulen

:Thesen

undErfah

rungen.

Inform

atik

Spektru

m,31(5):4

25–434.

Khoshnevis,

B.(2004).

Automated

constru

ctionbycontourcraftin

g—

relatedrobotics

and

inform

ationtech

nologies.

JournalofAutomatio

nin

Constru

ctio

n,13:5–19.

OMG

(2006).

Object

Constrain

tLan

guag

e,versio

n2.0.Tech

nical

Rep

ortform

al/06-05-01.

OMG

(2011a).

Unified

modelin

glan

guag

e:Infrastru

cture,

version2.4.1.Tech

nical

Rep

ortform

al/2011-08-05.

OMG

(2011b).

Unified

modelin

glan

guag

e:Superstru

cture,

version2.4.1.Tech

nical

Rep

ortform

al/2011-08-06.