31

Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s
Page 2: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Learner Objectives

Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills)

vs.

Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting)

Review SEL’s and EL’s similarities and differences

Instructional Strategies

Monitoring, Evaluation and Accountability

Page 3: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Definition

Informal Language- Language that is spoken with friends and a setting that is not formal such as home.

Formal Language- Language that is spoken in an academic and professional setting such as school, work, or any other establishment.

Page 4: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Standard English Learner’s are very different from English Learners when it comes to attaining academic language comprehension.Strategies for English Learners to attain comprehension do not work on Standard English Learners.Standard English Learners are consistently promoting to the next grade level while English Learner’s are not.Think-Write Pair Share only gives opportunity for thinking and speaking but no writing or critical thinking is occurring.

Thinking Maps are just graphic organizers that students must fill in completely to be effective.At least 40% or higher of Panorama High School Students are Proficient or Advanced on ELA of CST’s.

Page 5: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Panorama High School

Have Standard English Language

EO's Proficient and AdvancedAll Others

Only 7% Proficient & Advanced

Page 6: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Panorama High School Students B,Bb or FBB 93%

Do Not Have Standard English Language

SEL's & Second Language Learners

93%

Page 7: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

DefinitionWho are the Standard English Learners? (SEL’s) Standard English Learners are English Only

who are basic or below on CST ELA and do not have the Standard English to go from a basic informal communication setting to a formal academic setting.

Page 8: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Purpose of identifying SEL’s To know their needs-

◦To provide appropriate instructional strategies

◦To provide opportunities for language development.

Page 9: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Panorama High School Enrollment by Language Classification

Second Language Learners

SEL's

Others EO's,IFEP's

1390 Students

7% 115Students

85%

8%130 Students

Page 10: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Activity-Think Pair Share

5 min.Individually analyze the following

data.5 min. share to your neighbor trends that

you see.5 min. One person from each group share

what they see for one particular grade beginning with the 9th grade.

Page 11: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Data Analysis by Grade Level Promotion

Subgroup in

which student belongs

Current9R

StudentsClass of

2015

Current10th Grade StudentsClass of 2015

% of Students that did not promote to 10th Grade

Current10R

StudentsClass of 2014

Current11th Grade StudentsClass of

2014

% of Students that did not promote to 11th Grade

Current11R

StudentsClass of

2013

Current12th Grade Students Class of

2013

% of Students that did not promote to 12th Grade

Total StudentsAll (Sub-Groups)

65 37 64% 33 26 56% 23 20 54%

EL/SEL’s(General Education)

46 N/A 70% 17 N/A 54% 12 N/A 52%

SDC/EL/ SEL’s

13 N/A 20% 14 N/A 40% 7 N/A 30%

Resource/EL/SEL’s(General Education)

6 N/A 9% 2 N/A 6% 4 N/A 18%

Page 12: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Share outPlease share out any trends you may have

noticed or ask your partner any questions you may have?

Page 13: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Characteristics of EL’s and SEL’s

EnglishLearner

s

Standard

English Learne

rs

Home Language

Not English

Home Languag

e is English

Easily Identified on SIS

Not easily

identified on SIS

Need the use of

instructional strategies

Not Promoting to the

next grade level

Lack skills in Standard English

and Academic Vocabular

y

Flaminio Zarate

N/A N/A

Page 14: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Access to Core Strategies (SDAIE)

Several Strategies we will use at Panorama High School:

21st Century Learner Collaborative Models

Think-Write Pair ShareAnticipation GuidesThinking Maps

Page 15: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Think-Write Pair Share This is a good strategy to allow students first think.

Allows students to generate the language through the four domains:

Listening, reading, writing, and speaking

Promotes the use of Standard English and Academic Vocabulary within the content.

Page 16: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Why use Anticipation Guides?

They teach students to make predictions, anticipate the text, and verify their predictions.

They connect new information to prior knowledge and build curiosity about a new topic.

Anticipation guides stimulate students' interest in a topic and set a purpose for reading.

Page 17: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Most English Learners (LTEL’s) , SEL’s are found in Special Education and are not in my classroom.

Page 18: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Thinking Maps This strategy helps students strategize in how to focus their

thoughts and ideas.

Vocabulary-Bubble Maps

Compare and Contrast-Double Bubble

Cause and Effect- Multi-flow Map

Page 19: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s
Page 20: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

LAUSD Evaluation and Accountability GoalsGoal 1-Implement the English Learner Master

Plan fully and consistently across the district.

Goal 2-Ensure steady progress towards and attainment of academic English language development per expected timeframes.

Goal 3-Ensure steady progress toward and attainment of grade level academic proficiency

Page 21: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Evaluation (AMAO # 1) Percentage of English Learners

progressing at attaining English proficiency. English Learners must move at least one CELDT level each year.

The number of Long Term English Learners that are Reclassified each year so as to reduce the number of LTEL’s in the school.

Page 22: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Panorama H.S. Reclassification Evaluation

Need to continue to improve instructional strategies in classroom to reduce the

LTEL’s

Page 23: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Panorama High SchoolPerformance Meter

Page 24: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Demographics of LTEL’s (Long Term English Learners)

LTEL's -320

Students

75%

428 Total English Learners

Short Term

108 Students

25%

PRP Students in General education and Special education

Page 25: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Long Term English Learners Data Analysis

Grade LTEL Total #Of LTEL’s That are SP.ED.

% of LTEL/SP.ED

Total # ofSP.ED. Students that are EL.

% of all EL SP.ED that are LTEL

9th 163 66 40.4% ----------- -------

10th 77 41 53.2% ----------- -------

11th 54 32 59.2% ------------ -------

12th 26 20 77% ------------ -------

Total 320 159 49.7% 174 91.3%

Page 26: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Data Analysis by Grade Level Promotion

Subgroup in

which student belongs

Current9R

StudentsClass of

2015

Current10th Grade StudentsClass of 2015

% of Students that did not promote to 10th Grade

Current10R

StudentsClass of 2014

Current11th Grade StudentsClass of

2014

% of Students that did not promote to 11th Grade

Current11R

StudentsClass of

2013

Current12th Grade Students Class of

2013

% of Students that did not promote to 12th Grade

Total StudentsAll (Sub-Groups)

65 37 64% 33 26 56% 23 20 54%

EL/SEL’s(General Education)

46 N/A 70% 17 N/A 54% 12 N/A 52%

SDC/EL/ SEL’s

13 N/A 20% 14 N/A 40% 7 N/A 30%

Resource/EL/SEL’s(General Education)

6 N/A 9% 2 N/A 6% 4 N/A 18%

Page 27: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s
Page 28: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s
Page 29: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

Reflective Question?3 min. Discuss at your table.How will the measurement of

these goals:1. guides staff towards

performance, and2. result in student achievement

Page 30: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

EL Module 4Please answer the questions on

the worksheet to comply with this module as you listen to the video.

Page 31: Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s

http://lausd.wistia.com/medias/zgo5ckccay