Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Late Holocene fire history and vegetation
dynamics: a pollen and charcoal record from
a southern Finnish lake.
Michelle Buchan
Master’s Thesis
University of Helsinki
Department of Geosciences and Geology
Palaeobiology and Palaeoclimatology
31/10/2017
Tiedekunta/Osasto Fakultet/Sektion – Faculty Laitos/Institution– Department
Faculty of Science Department of Geosciences and Geography
Tekijä/Författare – Author
Michelle Salkeld Buchan
Työn nimi / Arbetets titel – Title
Late Holocene fire history and vegetation dynamics: a pollen and charcoal record from a
southern Finnish lake.
Työn laji/Arbetets art – Level Aika/Datum–Month and year Sivumäärä/ Sidoantal – Number of pages
Master’s Thesis 10/2017 61
Tiivistelmä/Referat – Abstract
Lake sediments from Valkea–Kotinen, a small lake in the Evo area of southern Finland,
were analysed to provide a high–resolution reconstruction of the fire episode and
vegetation structure histories of the past ca. 1700 years at the site. Mixing of sediment
was a problem in approximately the top half of the core, affecting the accuracy of the
chronology and the correct interpretation of pollen and charcoal accumulation. Six local
fire episodes were identified using the CharAnalysis program with a mean fire return
interval of 312 years. None these episodes could be attributed to human activities with
the exception of the episode at ca. 15 cal yr BP which may have been due to the
controlled burning of forest for regeneration elsewhere in Evo. The vegetation structure
was typical for southern Finland with Picea, Pinus, Alnus, and Betula dominating the site.
Signals of human activity such as an increase in Cerealia pollen alongside an increase in
microcharcoal from ca. 1000 cal yr BP indicate regional slash and burn activity. An
episodic Alnus decline is evident from ca. 1400 cal yr BP with a subsequent recovery at
around 1000 cal yr BP. The results show that the local fire regime at Valkea–Kotinen is
likely natural and the vegetation structure has been consistent with little anthropogenic
influence over the last ca. 1700 years.
Avainsanat – Nyckelord – Keywords
Pollen analysis · Microcharcoal · Macrocharcoal · CharAnalysis · Vegetation Structure · Pollen Accumulation Rate
Säilytyspaikka – Förvaringställe – Where deposited
University of Helsinki, Department of Geosciences and Geography, Division of Geology Muita tietoja – Övriga uppgifter – Additional information
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1
2. Background and Study Site ............................................................................ 4
2.1 The Boreal Forest ......................................................................................................................4
2.2 Lake Basin Characteristics........................................................................................................5
2.3 Vegetation at Valkea–Kotinen ................................................................................................6
2.4 Climate at Valkea–Kotinen ......................................................................................................7
3. Materials and Methods .................................................................................. 7
3.1 Field Methods ............................................................................................................................7
3.2 Laboratory Methods..................................................................................................................8
3.2.1 Pollen and Microscopic Charcoal Analyses ...................................................................8
3.2.2 Macroscopic Charcoal Analysis .......................................................................................9
3.2.3 CharAnalysis Methodology ..............................................................................................9
3.2.4 AMS 14C Radiocarbon Dating ...................................................................................... 10
3.2.5 210Pb and 137Cs Dating .................................................................................................... 10
3.2.6 Cross Correlation ............................................................................................................ 11
4. Results .......................................................................................................... 12
4.1 210Pb and 137Cs Dating ............................................................................................................ 12
4.2 AMS 14C Radiocarbon Dating and Age–depth Model ..................................................... 13
4.3 Pollen–Stratigraphic Age Anchor Point ............................................................................. 14
4.4 Macrocharcoal Analysis ......................................................................................................... 15
4.4.1 CharAnalysis Results ...................................................................................................... 15
4.4.2 Macrocharcoal Accumulation Rate .............................................................................. 16
4.4.3 Local Fire Episodes ........................................................................................................ 16
4.5 Fossil Pollen Data................................................................................................................... 18
4.6 Microcharcoal Accumulation ............................................................................................... 19
4.7 Cross–correlation ................................................................................................................... 19
5. Discussion ................................................................................................... 26
5.1 Lake Sedimentation Processes ............................................................................................. 26
5.2 Fire History at Valkea–Kotinen ........................................................................................... 27
5.3 Vegetation History at Valkea–Kotinen ............................................................................... 32
5.4 The Alnus Decline 1400 – 1000 Cal yr BP ....................................................................... 35
5.5 PARs vs Percentages as Tools for Detecting Environmental Change.......................... 39
6. Conclusions ................................................................................................. 42
7. Acknowledgements ...................................................................................... 44
8. References ................................................................................................... 45
P a g e | 1
1. Introduction
A great deal of research has, in the past, focused on the complex interrelationships between
vegetation, climate and other ecological processes and on how these interactions have
influenced past and present environments. Lake sediments are known to be valuable
archives of palaeoenvironmental information, commonly providing a continuous record
with the potential for high temporal resolution. Palaeoecological studies based on fossil
pollen and charcoal analyses from lake sediments can provide important information and
evidence to enable the reconstruction of past vegetation and fire regimes. Using these
proxy indicators as a means of reconstructing the past can give us an increased
understanding about the complex nature of landscapes and ecological processes as well as
giving us the means to assess the long term implications of fire, vegetation and climate
interactions (Gavin et al. 2007).
Fossil pollen analysis is a useful source for reconstructing and interpreting local and
regional vegetation dynamics and climatic events, particularly during the Quaternary period
(Seppä 2013). Alongside fossil pollen analysis, microcharcoal and macrocharcoal are used
to reconstruct long–term variances in fire regime and to examine the relationship between
climate, vegetation, fire and anthropogenic activities (Whitlock and Larsen 2002) as after
climate, fire is one of the main drivers of change in species composition in boreal forests
(Lehtonen and Kolström 2000; Ryan 2002).
Macrocharcoal and microcharcoal are both important proxies for reconstructing past fire
occurrence. The majority of macrocharcoal falls close to its source, meaning that peaks of
macrocharcoal in the sediment record are representative of ‘local’ fire episodes (Clark 1989)
and regional fire occurrences are reflected by the microcharcoal record as microcharcoal is
P a g e | 2
able to travel greater distances through the air. One important development in the study of
macrocharcoal has been the development of a charcoal peak screening process (Gavin et al
2006) by which an identified threshold of background charcoal ‘noise’ can be deducted
from the overall charcoal occurrence to identify peaks in the record which are reflective of
past fire episode occurrences. One such program which has this capacity is CharAnalysis
(Higuera et al. 2009), and is therefore employed in this study to identify past local fire
episodes at Valkea–Kotinen.
Lake sediment studies using pollen analysis as a proxy often use pollen percentage values to
infer vegetation composition but the disadvantage of using percentage data is that it does
not take into account facts such as the difference between pollen productivity in different
taxa and differences in pollen dispersal through the air (Sugita 1994; Broström et al. 2008;
Marquer et al. 2014). To circumvent the inherent problems associated with using
percentage data for vegetation reconstructions, pollen accumulation rates (PARs), which do
not rely on the relative measure of species to species, have been used to more accurately
assess vegetation change (e.g. Davis and Deevey 1964; Giesecke and Fontana 2008; Seppä
et al 2009; O’Connell et al. 2014). Therefore the PAR method has been employed for the
Valkea–Kotinen sediment record to provide the most accurate reflection of vegetation
dynamics at the site.
This thesis describes the palaeoecological research undertaken from lake sediments in
southern Finland. It adds to the growing body of research of past boreal forest vegetation
dynamics on a local and regional scale in Finland and throughout Fennoscandia as a whole
through the study of a ca. 1700 year sediment record from Lake Valkea–Kotinen in the
Kotinen State Forest Reserve, southern Finland. The primary objective is to provide
P a g e | 3
charcoal and pollen evidence of past fire regime and vegetation structure at Valkea–
Kotinen, where the surroundings are currently spruce dominated mesic forest.
This study adds to the growing body of research of boreal forest fire vegetation dynamics
on a local and regional scale in Finland and throughout Fennoscandia as a whole.
Therefore with that in mind, the analyses of charcoal and pollen in the Valkea–Kotinen
sediment core were done so in an attempt to address the following research questions:
What was the past fire regime at Valkea–Kotinen? How many fire episodes can be
identified and how have these affected the vegetation?
How do the macrocharcoal and microcharcoal records at Valkea–Kotinen
compare? What do they reveal about the fire history on a local and regional scale?
Have there been any changes in vegetation structure at Valkea–Kotinen through
time?
What has driven vegetation changes?
How useful are pollen accumulation rates for assessing past changes in vegetation
structure?
P a g e | 4
2. Background and Study Site
2.1 The Boreal Forest
The boreal forest is the largest terrestrial biome on earth, extending throughout northern
Eurasia and North America. Although extensive, the area can be described as being
‘floristically simple’ (Stocks et al. 2008) as it is dominated by only a few coniferous and
deciduous taxa. In Finland, the main boreal taxa include Picea abies (Norway spruce) and
Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine). Present to a lesser extent are also Betula pubescens (downy birch),
Betula pendula (silver birch), and Alnus incana (grey alder). Becoming more common towards
the southern edge of the boreal forest are also more thermophilous broad–leaf deciduous
species such as Quercus robur (pedunculated oak), Corylus avellana (hazel), Tilia cordata (small–
leaved lime), Ulmus glabra
(wych elm) and Alnus glutinosa
(common alder). Herbaceous
plants including Vaccinium
myrtillus (bilberry), Vaccinium
vitis–idaea (lingonberry), and
Rubus idaeus (Raspberry)
amongst others are also very
common.
Figure 1: Mesic spruce forest on the west side of Valkea-
Kotinen looking East. Photo author’s own.
P a g e | 5
2.2 Lake Basin Characteristics
Valkea–Kotinen (61° 14' N, 25° 04' E.) (Figure 2), is a small 3.59 ha headwater lake,
situated within the Valkea–Kotinen environmental monitoring area, a 30 hectare area of
pristine forest, bogs and waterbodies (Jylhä et al. 2013) located in the Evo region in the
Padasjoki municipality, southern Finland. The mean and maximum depths are 3.0 m and
6.5 m respectively (Niinioja and Villa 1995). There is no inlet to the lake but there is a small
outlet on the south side.
Figure 2: Map overview (O = study site) (© Esri 2017), photograph of Valkea-
Kotinen (author’s own) and map of Valkea-Kotinen (X = approx. location of coring
site) (Modified from © National Land Survey of Finland 2017).
P a g e | 6
There is no human settlement, industry or agricultural practices present in the catchment
area (Bergström 1995). The Valkea–Kotinen catchment was protected in 1955 by the
National Board of Forestry (later the Finnish Forest and Park Service) as part of the
Kotinen State Forest Reserve. This area was expanded in 1987 and was then made a nature
reserve as part of a protection scheme for primeval forests in 1994 (Mäkelä 1995). The
nature reserve makes up part of the larger Evo Hiking Area, a 47 km2 area of hiking trails
in the Kanta–Häme region, established in 1994.
2.3 Vegetation at Valkea–Kotinen
Forest covers around 66%, and
peatlands around 22% of the total
area immediately surrounding the
lake. The dominant forest vegetation
site types at Valkea–Kotinen are
mesic and rich heaths (Hämet–Ahti
1989). The forest is mainly old virgin
forest with several canopy layers. The
dominant trees are 80 to 150 year old
Norway spruce (Figure 1). Birch, aspen and Scots pine are also present. The oldest trees
surrounding the lake are Scots pines dating to over 350 years. The area is currently
administered by Metsähallitus who have undertaken intensive forest management practices
on the south side of the lake as a result the trees in that area date to on average 40 to 50
years old.
Figure 3: Vegetation types and coverage at Valkea-
Kotinen (Mäkelä 1995)
P a g e | 7
A zone of dwarf shrub pine bog surrounds the lake, becoming a treeless fen zone towards
the south end (Figure 3). On the east side of the lake beyond the dwarf shrub pine bog,
there is a strip of thin–peat spruce forest. On the west side of the lake there is an extensive
area of Vaccinium myrtillus drained peatland forest (Eurola et al. 1984).
2.4 Climate at Valkea–Kotinen
The region is located in the southern boreal vegetation zone according to a global scale
climate classification system (Ahti et al. 1968; Solantie 2005). It is characterised by cold
winters, where the lake is frozen over for around 170 days of the year (Niinioja and Villa
1995), with high precipitation. In winter the coldest average air temperature is –3°C.
Summers are short and mild with an average temperature above 10°C occurring only
between June and August (Critchfield 1966; Jylhä et al. 2010). The annual mean
precipitation is 618 mm (Mäkelä 1995).
3. Materials and Methods
3.1 Field Methods
In June 2016, the fieldwork was carried out. A small inflatable dinghy (Figure 4) was used
to row approximately 50 metres from the west shore of the lake where a 37.5 cm long
sediment core was extracted using a 50 cm long, 66 mm diameter HTH sediment corer
(Figure 4) (Renberg and Hansson 2008). The core was sub–sampled at site, by scraping off
5 mm increments of sediment from the top down and bagging them individually to provide
P a g e | 8
a high resolution series.. A total of 73
samples were obtained and were then
stored below 5°C at the University of
Helsinki.
3.2 Laboratory Methods
3.2.1 Pollen and Microscopic Charcoal Analyses
Pollen and microscopic charcoal were analysed from continuous sub–samples. Pollen
preparation followed the process outlined in Bennett and Willis (2003) with the elimination
of the sieving step to retain small grains. Three Lycopodium tablets were added to each
sample to allow the calculation of pollen concentrations (Stockmarr 1971). The samples
were mounted with clear silicone oil and a minimum of 500 terrestrial pollen grains were
counted per sample (Bennett and Willis 2003) to at least family level and any microcharcoal
>20 µm identified during each count was also recorded. Lycopodium spores were counted
alongside pollen to calculate the pollen concentration, which was then divided by
deposition time (yr cm−1) to calculate the pollen accumulation rate (PAR) (grains cm−2 yr−1).
Pollen and microcharcoal diagrams were plotted using TILIA and TILIA.GRAPH v. 2.0.41
software (Grimm 2015).
Figure 4: Left: Dinghy used to collect
sediment core in. Right: HTH sediment
corer. Both photographs taken at
Valkea-Kotinen by author.
P a g e | 9
3.2.2 Macroscopic Charcoal Analysis
1 cm3 of sediment from each sample was treated with dilute 14% NaOCI to promote
sediment disaggregation before being sieved at 150 µm. The sediment residue was added to
20 ml distilled water and decanted to a petri dish for charcoal analysis. Using a stereo
microscope, charcoal was identified as brittle, black crystalline particles with angular broken
edges (Swain 1973, 1978).
3.2.3 CharAnalysis Methodology
The macroscopic charcoal record underwent statistical analysis using the stand–alone
program CharAnalysis through MATLAB (Higuera et al. 2009), which decomposed the
record into peak (Cpeak) and background (Cbackground) components in order to
determine ‘fire episodes’. Charcoal concentration was interpolated to constant time steps
(using the age–depth model as shown in Figure 2), representing the average sample
resolution of the record (24 yr cm–1 at Valkea–Kotinen) to produce equally spaced intervals
and then calculated the macrocharcoal accumulation rate (CHAR particles cm–2 yr–1). The
non–log transformed CHAR series was then fitted with a Lowess smoother, robust to
outliers, to smooth the series and as such identify Cbackground. Cpeak was what remained
after the Cbackground, smoothed over a period of 500 years, was subtracted from the
CHAR time series (Higuera et al. 2010).
P a g e | 10
3.2.4 AMS 14C Radiocarbon Dating
From the samples at 29.5 cm and 35 cm of the core, 1 cm3 of bulk sediment was taken to
be sent for 14C accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dating at the Poznań Radiocarbon
Laboratory, Poland. The results are displayed below in Table 1.
Depth (cm) Lab
Code AMS 14C
Age Material
Cal BP Range
σ Median Age Cal BP
35.0–35.5 Poz–87154
1865±30 BP Bulk, gyttja
1874–1720 95.4 1803
29.5–30.0 Poz–87157
1325±30 BP Bulk, gyttja
1300–1182 95.4 1268
3.2.5 210Pb and 137Cs Dating
The top 20 cm of the core was analysed for 210Pb and 137Cs content. This procedure works
well for dating sediments accumulated in the last 200 years (Appleby 2001, 2008). The
technique is based on the analyses of the decay of constantly accumulating 210Pb (half–life
22.3 years) from the atmosphere into lake sediments. Alongside this, 137Cs, an artificial
nuclide indicative of human activity such as the nuclear weapons testing in the 1950’s and
1960’s and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, deposited in lake sediments in a similar manner
to 210Pb is often also analysed and the technique has also been employed in this study.
The sediment from each sample of the top 20 cm (40 samples in total) was freeze dried and
compacted in the Department of Geosciences and Geology at the University of Helsinki.
The freeze dried samples ranged in weight from 0.14 grams to 2.56 grams. The samples
were then sent to Department of Chemistry at the University of Helsinki to be analysed
using gamma spectrometry. The results can be seen in Table 2.
Table 1: AMS 14C radiocarbon dates obtained from Valkea-Kotinen.
P a g e | 11
Depth [cm]
Pb–210 [Bq/g]
±2σ % Cs–137 [Bq/g]
±2σ % Age [y] Year Uncertaint
y [y]
0.75 0.71 0.17 0.24 4.63 0.47 0.10 6.4 2010 3
1.25 0.60 0.08 0.14 4.56 0.46 0.14 10.7 2005 4
1.75 0.63 0.10 0.15 4.29 0.43 0.10 15.0 2001 6
2.25 0.62 0.13 0.21 3.97 0.40 0.10 19.3 1997 8
2.75 0.49 0.10 0.20 3.66 0.37 0.10 23.5 1992 10
3.25 0.42 0.08 0.19 3.74 0.37 0.10 27.8 1988 12
3.75 0.28 0.09 0.34 3.65 0.37 0.10 32.1 1984 13
4.25 0.35 0.07 0.21 3.80 0.39 0.10 36.4 1980 15
4.75 0.44 0.10 0.22 3.92 0.40 0.10 40.7 1975 17
5.25 0.39 0.06 0.17 3.63 0.37 0.10 44.9 1971 19
5.75 0.36 0.06 0.17 3.60 0.36 0.10 49.2 1967 20
6.25 0.37 0.07 0.19 3.17 0.32 0.10 53.5 1963 22
6.75 0.35 0.06 0.18 2.88 0.29 0.10 57.8 1958 24
7.25 0.31 0.08 0.25 2.66 0.27 0.10 62.0 1954 26
7.75 0.32 0.09 0.28 2.69 0.27 0.10 66.3 1950 27
8.25 0.10 0.06 0.61 2.02 0.21 0.10 70.6 1945 29
8.75 0.15 0.05 0.33 1.64 0.17 0.10 74.9 1941 31
9.25 0.16 0.05 0.29 1.48 0.15 0.10 79.2 1937 33
9.75 0.21 0.09 0.41 1.37 0.14 0.10 83.4 1933 35
10.25 0.06 0.04 0.62 1.07 0.11 0.10 87.7 1928 36
12.75 – – – 0.59 0.06 0.10 109.1 1907 45
15.25 0.01 0.05 6.97 0.45 0.05 0.10 130.5 1885 54
19.75 – – – 0.37 0.04 0.10 169.0 1847 70
3.2.6 Cross–correlation
Cross–correlation coefficients of macroscopic charcoal and selected pollen taxa were
calculated using the Minitab® 18 Statistical Software to identify any potential links between
fire episodes and vegetation dynamics (Green, 1981; 1983; Colombaroli et al. 2008). This
method compares the values for two variables i.e. charcoal and pollen by shifting the value
chains against one another for a specified number of time lags and then calculating
correlation coefficients for each time lag (Bahrenberg et al. 1992). Non–transformed pollen
Table 2: 210Pb and 137Cs results obtained from Valkea-Kotinen.
P a g e | 12
percentage data and charcoal counts were used. The 35 samples below the 19 cm mark in
the core were used to compute cross–correlation coefficients at ±25 lags. Each lag
represents a period of 32.9 years. The 95% interval of the cross–correlation coefficients
was estimated by computing ±SE (standard error) of the correlation coefficients (0.36 and
–0.36) (Bahrenberg et al. 1992). This corresponds to a test for significant correlation
between two variables (Tinner et al. 1999).
4. Results
4.1 210PB and 137Cs Dating
The results obtained from the 210Pb dating were determined unreliable as the uncertainty
limits were quite large (Table 2). The sedimentation rate was calculated to be quite quick at
0.117 ±0.049 cm per year (95 % confidence interval) which in comparison to the 0.020 cm
per year calculated using the AMS 14C dates, adding to the unreliability of the results.
Figure 5: 210Pb and 137Cs profiles at Valkea-Kotinen.
P a g e | 13
The 137Cs profile at Valkea–Kotinen (Figure 5) indicates mixing of the sediments
(Lempinen 2017; Appleby 1997). Theoretically, two peaks in 137Cs should be witnessed in
the core; one to reflect the 1950’s and 1960’s nuclear bomb tests and one around 1986 to
reflect the fallout from the Chernobyl disaster. Neither of these peaks is present at Valkea–
Kotinen.
Sediment mixing is a common problem encountered through this method and usually
results in a dampening of peaks in 210Pb and 137Cs. As such, these results were omitted from
the age–depth model, with the exception of the surface date which confirmed the top of
the core was modern, as they were considered to be too unreliable.
4.2 AMS 14C Radiocarbon Dating and Age–depth Model
The two samples sent for radiocarbon dating were dated successfully (Table 1) and were
then calibrated using the IntCal13 calibration dataset (Reimer et al. 2013) and alongside the
modern 210Pb date, an age–depth model (Figure 6) was created using the Clam 2.2
programme deposition model in R software (Blaauw 2010) with a linear interpolation
confidence level of 2 σ (95.4%). Each of the samples was calculated to represent a median
of 24 years and the average sedimentation rate was calculated at 0.020 cm per year.
P a g e | 14
4.3 Pollen–Stratigraphic Age Anchor Point
One factor, which is discussed further in section 5.4, was a decline in Alnus pollen
percentage and accumulation rate which began at ca. 1400 cal yr BP and ended at ca. 1000
cal yr BP (Stivrins et al. 2017). This was a phenomenon observed throughout many areas of
Northern Europe at the time. The occurrence of this decline and subsequent recovery in
the Valkea–Kotinen sediment core can be used as a pollen–stratigraphic age anchor point
in addition to the 14C AMS dates. This indicator also gives credence to the accuracy of the
age–depth model at this stage of the core as above 19 cm (ca. 1000 cal yr BP) the age–
depth model become ambiguous towards the surface (Figure 7).
Figure 6: Age versus depth model for Valkea-Kotinen.
P a g e | 15
As the chronology of the age–depth model was based on so few dates, it is unlikely to be
fully accurate, especially after ca. 1000 cal yr BP. Any interpretation or discussion regarding
the timing of fire episodes or vegetation changes must take this into consideration.
4.4 Macrocharcoal Analysis
4.4.1 CharAnalysis Results
Decomposition of macrocharcoal accumulation records (CHAR; particles cm2 yr–1) from
Lake Valkea–Kotinen indicate fire–episode occurrence and magnitude over the last ca.
1700 years (Figure 8) The term ‘Fire episode’ is used rather than ‘fire’ to describe the
Figure 7: Alnus pollen percentage and accumulation curves alongside the age–
depth model from Valkea-Kotinen. Orange dashed line denotes the 19 cm (ca.
1000 cal yr BP) mark.
P a g e | 16
statistically significant peaks in the CHAR record because more than one fire could have
occurred within the duration of a peak (Long et al. 1998). The term ‘peak magnitude’ refers
to the total charcoal accumulation in a peak and is hereafter referred to as ‘magnitude’.
The term ‘magnitude’ can refer to the fire episode size/severity, the proximity of a fire
episode to a site and the taphonomic processes by which charcoal is deposited into the
lake, or a combination of all these factors (Clark et al. 1998; Whitlock and Millspaugh 1996;
Lynch et al. 2004; Higuera et al. 2005; Higuera et al. 2007). If a fire episode is followed by a
vegetation change it is more likely that magnitude is recording fire size/severity rather than
any other factor.
4.4.2 Macrocharcoal Accumulation Rate
CHAR for the record’s interpolated intervals (Cint) had a mean of 0.31 particles cm–2 yr–1
and a range of 0.00 particles cm–2 yr–1 to 0.79 particles cm–2 yr–1 (Figure 8a.). The maximum
CHAR level was the highest amount recorded as part of a fire episode occurring at around
900 BP. The background CHAR level (Cback) had an average of 0.26 particles cm–2 yr–1 and
a range of 0.00 particles cm–2 yr–1 to 0.63 particles cm–2 yr–1.
4.4.3 Local Fire Episodes
Analysis of the macrocharcoal record at Valkea–Kotinen identified six local fire episodes at
around 1570, 1290, 900, 615, 470 and 15 cal yr BP (Figure 8b.). The fire return interval
(FRI) was on average 312 years (range 221 – 408 years).
P a g e | 17
The first recorded local fire episode occurred at ca.1570 cal yr BP, and had a peak
magnitude of 9.2 charcoal pieces cm–2 peak–1 (Figure 8c.) and was immediately followed by
a decline in Alnus, Betula and Picea accumulation (Figure 10). The next fire episode,
recorded at ca. 1290 cal yr BP had the lowest peak magnitude of all the episodes at 2.2
pieces cm–2 peak–1 (Figure 8c.) and had no apparent effect on the vegetation. The fire
episode recorded at ca. 900 cal yr BP had a peak magnitude of 6.6 pieces cm–2 peak–1
(Figure 8c.) and was followed by a reduction in Betula, Pinus (Figure 10) and overall total
pollen accumulation rates (Figure 13).
At ca. 615 cal yr BP the largest magnitude fire recorded in the core occurs with a peak
magnitude of 14.5 pieces cm–2 peak–1 (Figure 8c.). There is no real vegetation response at
this time meaning that the fire episode likely affected only a small area but happened in
very close proximity to the lake. A fire episode occurred at ca. 470 cal yr BP and was
recorded as low magnitude (3.3 pieces cm–2 peak–1) (Figure 8c.). Although recorded as low
magnitude, wind direction at the time may have affected charcoal deposition into the lake
resulting in a bias in the record. This episode is followed by a reduction Betula, Picea and
Pinus pollen accumulation (Figure 10), and Cerealia (Figure 11) pollen accumulation.
The final recorded fire episode in the chronology occurs at ca. 15 cal yr BP and is the
second highest magnitude of all the fire episodes at 13.0 pieces cm–2 peak–1 (Figure 8c.). It is
unlikely that this result is correct as there are no documented fires at Valkea–Kotinen at
this time. This is discussed further in section 5.2.
P a g e | 18
4.5 Fossil Pollen Data
Pollen percentage and accumulation rate diagrams for Valkea–Kotinen spanning the past
ca. 1700 years are illustrated in Figures 9–13. A total of 41 pollen and spore types were
identified from the lake core. Trees and shrubs dominated the local taxa with Pinus (average
58 %), Betula (average 22 %), Picea (average 10.9 %), and Alnus (average 4.4 %) of the total
pollen. Herbaceous taxa consisted 0 – 9.4 % and aquatics and spores consisted 0 – 2.4 % of
the total assemblage (Figure 9). Total tree and shrub accumulation rates ranged from 2907
– 8870 grains cm2 yr–1 (Figure 10), total herb accumulation rates ranged from 6 – 399 grains
Figure 8: a. Charcoal accumulation rate (CHAR-log scale; particles cm-2
yr-1), b. fire episodes (peaks; + symbols), and c. fire-episode magnitude for
Valkea-Kotinen plotted against age (Cal yr BP).
P a g e | 19
cm2 yr–1 (Figure 11), and aquatic and spore accumulation rates ranged from 0 to 140 grains
cm2 yr–1 (Figure 12). Overall pollen accumulation values for the whole record ranged from
2952 to 9373 grains cm2 yr–1 (Figure 13).
4.6 Microcharcoal Accumulation
Microcharcoal accumulation was lowest towards the bottom of the core and increased
towards the top of the core. The accumulation rate ranged from 88 particles cm–2 yr–1 at ca.
1100 cal yr BP to 671 particles cm–2 yr–1 ca. 480 cal yr BP (Figure 9).
4.7 Cross–correlation
The cross–correlation analysis for the Valkea–Kotinen core was only applied to those
samples below the 19 cm mark to try to gain the most accurate result regarding the
temporal relationship between charcoal and pollen at the site. It was not applied to Alnus as
cross–correlation is not a suitable statistical analysis for a taxon which has experienced a
decline (see section 5.4) (Tinner et al. 1999). Results are displayed in Figures 14 and 15. The
analysis reveals that an increase in microcharcoal due to a fire episode (at lag 0) lead to a
significant negative correlation in Picea at lag +11 (Figure 14). Increases in macrocharcoal
also lead to a significant negative correlation with Picea, at lag +12 (Figure 15). Neither
Pinus, nor Betula, nor Poaceae were significantly correlated with either microcharcoal or
macrocharcoal. Cerealia pollen was significantly positively correlated with microcharcoal at
lag 0 but had no significant correlation with macrocharcoal (Figures 14 and 15).
P a g e | 20
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
Cal Y
ears B
P
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Dep
th (cm
)
200 400 600 800
Cha
rcoa
l >20
µm
10
Alnus
20 40
Betula
10
Car
pinu
s
10
Cor
ylus
20
Picea
20 40 60 80
Pinus
10
Que
rcus
10
Salix
10
Tilia
10
Ulm
us
10
Calluna
vulga
ris
10
Eric
acea
e un
diff.
10
Fag
us
10
Frang
ula alnu
s
10
Hippo
phae
rha
mno
ides
10
Sor
bus
10
Cer
ealia
10
Artem
isia
10
Aster
acea
e
10
Bra
ssicac
eae
10
Can
naba
ceae
-typ
e
10
Cen
taur
ea cf. C. c
yanu
s
10
Che
nopo
diac
eae
10
Chico
riace
ae
10
Cyp
erac
eae
10
Filipe
ndula
10
Galium
10
Plantag
inac
eae
10
Poa
ceae
10
Ran
uncu
lace
ae
10
Rum
ex
10
Apiac
eae
10
Urtica
10
Viola palus
tris
10
Dro
sera
10
Men
yanthe
s trifo
liata
10
Spa
rgan
ium
10
Dryop
teris
10
Equ
isetum
10
Pterid
ium aqu
ilinu
m
10
Sph
agnu
m
Trees and Shrubs Herbs Aquatics Spores
Percentage Pollen Count (%)Particles cm -2 yr-1
Figure 9: Pollen and microcharcoal diagram from lake Valkea-Kotinen. Pollen abundances are expressed as percentages. Charcoal accumulation is
expressed as particles cm-2 yr-1. Exgenerations have been applied to some taxa. Note change in scale.
P a g e | 21
Figure 10: Pollen diagram showing accumulation rates of tree and shrub taxa at Valkea-Kotinen. Pollen values are expressed as accumulation rates
(grains cm-2 yr-1). Red lines represent local fire episodes as determined using CharAnalysis. Exgenerations have been applied to some taxa. Note
change in scale.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
Cal Y
ears
BP
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Dep
th (c
m)
200 400
Alnus
1000 2000 3000
Bet
ula
500 1000 1500
Picea
2000 4000 6000
Pinus
20 40
Cor
ylus
20 40
Que
rcus
20 40 60
Salix
10
Tilia
20
Ulm
us
Accumulation Rate (Grains cm -2 yr -1)
P a g e | 22
Figure 11: Pollen diagram showing accumulation rates of herb taxa at Valkea-Kotinen. Pollen values are expressed as accumulation rates (grains cm-2
yr-1). Red lines represent local fire episodes as determined using CharAnalysis. Exgenerations have been applied to some taxa. Note change in scale.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
Cal Y
ears
BP
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Dep
th (cm
)
100 200 300
Poa
ceae
50 100 150
Cer
ealia
20
Api
acea
e
20 40 60
Artem
isia
10
Ast
erac
eae
20 40
Callu
na vulga
ris
20
Bra
ssicac
eae
20
Can
naba
ceae
-type
10
Cen
taur
ea c
f. C. c
yanu
s
20 40
Che
nopo
diac
eae
20
Chico
riace
ae
10
Cyp
erac
eae
20
Pla
ntag
inac
eae
20
Ran
uncu
lace
ae
20 40
Rum
ex
20 40 60
Sor
bus
20
Urtica
10
Vio
la p
alus
tris
Accumulation Rate (Grains cm -2 yr -1)
P a g e | 23
Figure 12: Pollen diagram showing accumulation rates of aquatics and
spores. Pollen values are expressed as accumulation rates (grains cm-2 yr-1).
Red lines represent local fire episodes as determined using CharAnalysis.
Exgenerations have been applied to some taxa. Note change in scale.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
Cal Y
ears B
P
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Depth
(cm
)
10
Dro
sera
15 30
Dry
opte
ris
15 30
Equise
tum
15 30
Spargani
um
40 80 120
Sphagnu
m
10
Men
yanth
es tri
folia
ta
10
Pterid
ium
aquilin
um
Accumulation Rate (Grains cm -2 yr -1)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
Cal Y
ears
BP
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Dep
th (cm
)
4000 8000
Total T
rees
and
Shr
ubs
100 200 300 400
Total H
erbs
4000 8000
Total P
ollen
50 100 150
Total A
quatics an
d Spo
res
Accumulation Rate (Grains cm-2
yr -1
)
Figure 13: Pollen accumulation rates of total pollen, total tree and shrub
pollen, total herb pollen and total aquatics and spores at Valkea-Kotinen.
Pollen values are expressed as accumulation rates (grains cm-2 yr-1). Red
lines represent local fire episodes as determined using CharAnalysis.
Exgenerations have been applied to some taxa. Note change in scale.
P a g e | 24
Figure 14: Cross-correlation plots for microcharcoal vs. selected pollen. Dashed red line denotes significance level (0.36, -0.36). The horizontal axis
shows the lag time (1 lag = 32.9 years).
P a g e | 25
Figure 15: Cross-correlation plots for macrocharcoal vs. selected pollen. Dashed red line denotes significance level (0.36, -0.36). The horizontal axis
shows the lag time (1 lag = 32.9 years).
P a g e | 26
5. Discussion
5.1 Lake Sedimentation Processes
The mechanisms surrounding sediment accumulation into lakes are complicated. A multi–
core study of Holocene sediment accumulation patterns at Mirror Lake in New Hampshire,
USA, showed that pollen accumulation could be up to five times higher at one area of a
lake in comparison to another. Sediment generally focuses at the deepest point of the lake
so in palynological studies it is normally best to retrieve several sediment cores from
different areas throughout a lake as no single core provides an accurate record of pollen
input to a lake. The main reason for the within–lake variability in PAR is temporally and
spatially uneven patterns of sedimentation and pollen deposition which is typical to many
of the lakes in cold and temperate regions of the world (Davis et al. 1984).
As such the general changes in pollen accumulation over the past ca. 1700 years at Valkea–
Kotinen are likely to be mainly a result of the complex sedimentation and deposition
factors at work. For example, we can see in Figures 10 and 13 the accumulation rate at
Valkea–Kotinen follows a similar trend of high values at the bottom of the core, which
then reduce, rise slightly in the middle of the core before reducing again before increasing
at the top of the core, for the main tree taxa. This blanket trend is likely the effect of
sedimentation processes which affect the accumulation rate of each pollen type equally.
Other factors, including climate changes or human influences, may play a small part in the
accumulation rate but sedimentary processes are likely the driving force behind the changes
seen at Valkea–Kotinen.
The one sediment core used in this study is unlikely to give a full representation of the fire
and vegetation dynamics at the lake. Also, the results of the 210Pb and 137Cs analysis, whilst
P a g e | 27
erroneous and unsuitable for inclusion in the age–depth curve, do give us the advantage of
knowing that sediment mixing has occurred towards the surface of the core. Therefore the
following discussion regarding fire and vegetation dynamics at the lake is done so with the
knowledge that the results of this study are likely to be somewhat imprecise and not a true
reflection of the local and regional scale factors which have affected the Valkea–Kotinen
area over the past ca. 1700 years.
5.2 Fire History at Valkea–Kotinen
The local fire record at Valkea–Kotinen over the past 1740 years is quite sparse with only
six significant fire episodes and a fire return interval (FRI) of on average 312 years (range
144 – 456 years). This is also low in comparison to other areas of southern Finland. For
example, the FRI at Sudenpesä between 1700 and 400 cal yr BP was 200 years and at
Vesijako the FRI between 2000 and 750 cal yr BP was 180 years (Clear et al. 2013; 2015). It
is also low in comparison to other areas in Finland. For example, in eastern Finland the
average FRI is between 80–200 years depending on the site and vegetation type and period
of interest (Haapanen and Siitonen 1978: Pitkänen and Huttunen 1999). However the low
FRI at Valkea–Kotinen could be due to the fact that not every local fire episode,
particularly low intensity fire episodes, may have been identified (Higuera et al. 2005).
Another factor which may have affected the FRI is that wet, mesic Picea dominated forest,
like that at Valkea–Kotinen tend to burn less frequently than dry, Pinus dominated forests.
Picea dominated forest is more likely to experience high intensity, low frequency fires
(Tanskanen, 2007) whereas with Pinus dominated forest is more susceptible to high
frequency, low intensity surface fires (Zackrisson, 1977; Engelmark, 1984). Zackrisson
P a g e | 28
(1977) found that in northern Sweden found that Picea dominated mesic forests had an
average FRI of 80–120 years in comparison to Pinus dominated forests which had a FRI of
around on average 50 years. It is difficult to determine exactly whether the identified local
fire episodes were due to the effects of anthropogenic activities or were natural in nature
but the long FRI suggests that the local fire regime was not strongly influenced by
anthropogenic activity as a long FRI is quite typical for a natural forest (Hörnberg et al.
1998; Pitkänen et al. 2003).
Research into tree fire scar evidence by
Tuominen (1990) on the west side of the lake
found that there had been several local fire
episodes; at 1771, 1807, 1827, 1857, and 1886
but there is no indication of these local fires
in the sedimentary record at Valkea–Kotinen.
Just as sediment mixing towards the surface
of the core dampened the peaks in 210Pb and
137Cs it is possible that mixing resulted in
dampened macrocharcoal accumulation
peaks in the sediment after the local fire
episode identified with CharAnalysis at
around 470 cal yr BP meaning that the fire
episodes recorded by tree scars were lost in
the mixed sedimentary record.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
Cal Y
ears
BP
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Dep
th (c
m)
200 400 600 800
>20
µm
200 400 600
>150
µm
Accumulation Rate (Particles cm -2 yr-1)
Figure 16: Micro- and macrocharcoal
accumulation rates Charcoal values are
expressed as accumulation rates (Particles
cm-2 yr-1). Red lines represent local fire
episodes.
P a g e | 29
Microcharcoal in lake sediments is generally assumed to reflect fires on a regional scale,
whilst macrocharcoal reflects fires on a local scale (Whitlock and Larsen 2001). However,
in their study at Lake Pönttölampi in eastern Finland, Pitkänen et al. (1999) demonstrated
that fire–scars on trees around the lake coincided with peaks in microcharcoal in the
sediment, suggesting that a significant proportion of microcharcoal particles counted from
pollen slides can originate from low intensity local fires. However the microcharcoal has a
potentially large source area of within a few kilometres of the site.
This may be similar to the accumulation of microcharcoal at Valkea–Kotinen as we can see
from Figure 16 that microcharcoal tends to peak around the same time that there is a local
fire episode, suggesting that a significant proportion of the microcharcoal deposited into
the lake is of local origin. After around 470 cal yr BP when there is little macrocharcoal,
there is an abundance of microcharcoal which may be somewhat representative of the local
fire events recorded by Tuominen (1990). The exact cause of these fire events are uncertain
but are most likely the result of human activity. The use of fire in forests not highly
regulated in the 18th and 19th Centuries so the fire scars could be a result of human
negligence, leading to, for example, escaped camp fires (Parviainen 1996; Aakala 2017).
Therefore these local fires may be similar to the low–intensity local fires recorded in the
microcharcoal record at Lake Pönttölampi in by Pitkänen et al. (1999) but with a dampened
macrocharcoal record from sediment mixing or the fires may also have been too small to
appear as a peak in the macrocharcoal record.
The 1827 fire scar record recorded by Tuominen (1990) is likely a representation of a large
fire documented at Evo in 1826 if one allows for some dating error (Aakala 2017).
However again, there is no local fire episode recorded at this time by CharAnalysis which
also suggests the possibility of dampening of the macrocharcoal record through sediment
P a g e | 30
mixing. The wind direction at the time of a fire episode plays a large part in determining the
distribution of charcoal particles to a lake but it is unlikely that wind direction was the
factor preventing the deposition of macrocharcoal particles in the lake for all of the fire
episode recorded by Tuominen (1990) and as such the lack of macrocharcoal peaks in the
record is may be a result of sedimentary processes.
A scarcity in macrocharcoal towards the upper end could be explained as a result of active
fire suppression. The newly–established Forest and Parks Service introduced a fire
suppression policy in the 1860’s in Finland and other areas of Fennoscandia (Niklasson and
Granström 2000; Ruuttula–Vasari 2004; Halme et al. 2013) in the midst of the growing
forestry industry as a means of protecting timber resources. Fire suppression practices
included regulating the use of fire in Finnish forests, educating people of the effects of fires
and extinguishing fires as quickly as possible if they did occur (Wallenius 2011).
Logging was carried out in Evo in the 1800’s, until the area became a crown park under the
imperial senate in 1856. A forestry institute, the first of its kind in Finland, was established
in Evo in 1862 (Metsähallitus 2017) around 5.5 km from Valkea–Kotinen so it is likely that
active fire suppression was practiced in the forest surrounding the lake at this time.
However, at Valkea–Kotinen we can see that before the establishment of the forestry
institute in 1862, the last recorded local fire episode occurred at ca. 470 cal yr BP, long
before the advent of fire suppression to reduce, in part human induced fires, in Southern
Finland. This too gives credence to the assumption that the local fire history at Valkea–
Kotinen was not strongly influenced by anthropogenic activities.
Interestingly, despite active fire suppression in the Evo region, CharAnalysis identified a
local fire episode very close to the surface of the core, apparently occurring around 15 years
P a g e | 31
ago. There are no recorded fires at Valkea–Kotinen at this time so this peak in
macrocharcoal may be a result of the sediment mixing which has occurred in the top of the
core.
However, the fire episode is the second largest in intensity of the 6 recorded so it seems
unlikely that sediment mixing would create such a large peak in macrocharcoal especially
after the absence in macrocharcoal immediately preceding this peak. One possible
explanation could be that the macrocharcoal originates from controlled burning in the area.
The reduction of fires due to fire suppression resulted in the endangerment of ecological
processes reliant on fire regimes (Rassi 2003. As such, controlled burning has been carried
out in Evo since the 1950’s (Metsähallitus 2017) in an attempt to preserve the habitats of
organisms such as some insects which thrive in areas of burned wood and also to promote
vegetation growth.
Controlled burning was carried out at 16 sites within the Lammi commune of Evo between
1960 and 1982 (Lindholm and Vasander 1987). The closest of these sites to Valkea–
Kotinen were; Vähä Ruuhijärvi, burned in 1968, around 1.4 km away and Lapinjärvi,
burned in 1963, around 1 km away. Also, as part of the Evo Life Project, five spruce
dominated stands, each two hectares in size, were burned in the summer of 2002 and two
pine dominated stands, a total area of 9 hectares were burned in 2003 for regenerative
purposes (HAMK 2005). One of these burned stands was approximately 1.3 km away from
Valkea–Kotinen.
Due to the large size of macrocharcoal particles, the local fire episodes have always been
thought to be indicative of macrocharcoal deposition within 500 m to 1 km of the source.
(Gavin et al. 2003; Lynch et al. 2004; Higuera et al. 2007). However, some studies have
P a g e | 32
found that macrocharcoal has the potential to be distributed further than this. Higuera et
al. (2007) note that depending on the charcoal injection height to the atmosphere, the
source area for macroscopic charcoal can range between 300 m and 20 km. Similarly, in
their study of long distance charcoal transportation, Oris et al. (2014) identified a
macrocharcoal (particles 150 μm and over) peak at one of their study sites, 32 km away
from where the fire event occurred.
In addition to this, studies of modern lake charcoal accumulation indicate that charcoal
deposition into sediments can occur several years after a fire episode. For example,
Whitlock & Millspaugh (1996) discovered that lakes in burned and unburned watersheds in
Yellowstone National Park, USA, received charcoal during fires episodes in 1988, but the
amount deposited continued to increase significantly for five years after in burned
watersheds. Also, Anderson et al. (1986) observed that a lake in Maine, USA, received
charcoal for several decades following a fire episode.
As such it is possible that the macrocharcoal peak near the surface of the Valkea–Kotinen
record originates from the delayed charcoal deposition of prescribed burning, further than
1 km away, undertaken in the Evo area since the 1960’s.
5.3 Vegetation History at Valkea–Kotinen
The percentages and accumulation rates of pollen from Valkea–Kotinen over the past ca.
1700 years are indicative of a fairly stable vegetation dynamic with only slight fluctuations.
The dominance of conifers such as Pinus and Picea as well as broadleaved trees such as
Betula and Alnus in the Valkea–Kotinen is very typical for the South of Finland (Metla
2012).
P a g e | 33
As discussed in section 5.1, the general trend in pollen accumulation is most likely
attributed to changing sedimentation rates rather than any other factors. A study of the past
5000 years of water table variability at Kontolanrahka bog (Väliranta 2007) in southwestern
Finland shows that southern Finland has been subject to wetter and dryer climatic periods.
The past c 1700 years of water table variability is shown in Figure 17. Vegetation dynamics
do not seem to be influenced by the changing water table suggesting that climatic changes
were not strong enough over the past ca. 1700 years to impact upon the vegetation regime.
However some changes in vegetation structure can be identified. The most significant
change that occurred was a sudden episodic decline in Alnus beginning at c.a. 1400 cal yr
BP and is discussed further in section 5.4. Whilst fire episodes have led to a decline in
Betula and relatively fire resistant Pinus accumulation, the cross correlation analysis of both
microcharcoal and macrocharcoal show that the fires did not have a significant impact on
the population of either taxa al a local or regional scale.
Picea is a fire susceptible species (Bradshaw et al. 2010) as it has thin bark, low branches
and a superficial root system (Heikinheimo, 1915; Cajander, 1941). This susceptibility is
also seen in the Valkea–Kotinen record. Picea pollen correlates negatively with both
macrocharcoal and microcharcoal, although the negative relationship with macrocharcoal is
greater suggesting that local fires had more influence over the spruce population at Valkea–
Kotinen. However, it is well known that Picea is favoured by the absence of fire (Bradshaw
1993) and the long FRI (average 312 years) at Valkea–Kotinen is likely the reason why Picea
is the dominant taxon at the lake. The expansion of Picea has the effect of reducing
wildfires by increasing shade, moss cover and soil moisture (Ohlson et al. 2011). Therefore
the fires at Valkea–Kotinen have negatively impacted on Picea abundance but not to the
extent that the taxon could not recover, creating a positive feedback where the expansion
P a g e | 34
of Picea has potentially reduced the fire activity and in turn allowed for the dominance of
Picea in the area.
Indicators of human activity such as Poaceae, Filipendula and Cerealia are present throughout
the core but they begin to increase towards the present, suggesting a growing
anthropogenic influence on the vegetation. Cerealia pollen increases to a maximum of 115
grains cm−2 yr−1 at c. 160 cal yr BP, beginning around 650 years ago (Figure 11). There is
also a general increasing trend of microcharcoal and accumulation of other taxa related to
slash–and–burn cultivation i.e. Poaceae at the same time (Figure 11). This is
contemporaneous with the more permanent settlement of the Evo region, where Valkea–
Kotinen is located, in the 14th Century (Metsähallitus 2017). Slash–and–burn cultivation
was practiced in Southern Finland from 2400–2000 cal yr BP (Tanskanen 2007; Huurre
2003) until the 19th Century (Luoto et al. 2009). Huttunen (1980), however, notes that the
Evo region comprises only 1–2% arable land so slash–and–burn cultivation was rarely
practiced there but a round 20 km towards the south at Lammi, the land becomes more
fertile and as such more suitable for cultivation.
None of the local fire episodes show evidence of being related to slash–and–burn activities,
and Cerealia pollen is not significantly correlated with macrocharcoal increases (Figure 15)
but it is significantly positively correlated with microcharcoal increases (Figure 14).
Therefore, the increase in microcharcoal alongside Cerealia pollen and other slash and burn
related taxa is likely to be an indicator of regional forest clearance for cultivation through
slash–and–burn activity (Sarmaja–Korjonen 1992), perhaps in the Lammi area or elsewhere
in the region.
P a g e | 35
There is also no documented decline in Picea pollen accumulation (Figure 11) which is
often witnessed as a result of slash–and–burn (Alenius et al. 2008; Luoto et al. 2009;
Pitkänen et al. 2002). Due to their relatively large size (70–130 µm), Picea pollen grains do
not travel far from their source. Simulations have shown that Picea has a considerably
smaller pollen source area compared to light pollen types such as Betula and Alnus (Sugita
1994). In their study of modern pollen dispersal, Pidek et al. (2010) concluded that the
source area for Picea pollen is within 1 km of the parent tree. This also adds to the evidence
suggesting that the Cerealia grains are of regional descent as if cereal cultivation were
practiced near the lake; we would expect to see a gradual decline in Picea pollen
accumulation as Cerealia pollen accumulation increases but this does not occur at Valkea–
Kotinen.
There is however a sharp decline in Picea pollen accumulation towards the surface of the
core, beginning ca. 200 years ago. This is accompanied by a decline on both Pinus and
Alnus, and to a lesser extent Betula. These declines could be explained by the intensive
logging which took place in Evo in the 1800’s as part of the country’s shipbuilding and tar
industries (Metla 2012a).
5.4 The Alnus Decline 1400 – 1000 Cal yr BP
A decline in Alnus pollen values beginning at ca. 1400 cal yr BP can be witnessed at
Valkea–Kotinen and has been discussed along with several other sites in Southern Finland
in a paper by Stivrins et al. (2017). This is a decline that has been witnessed in pollen
diagrams throughout Northern Europe at ca. 1400 – 1000 cal yr BP and has historically
been attributed to anthropogenic influences (Sarmaja–Korjonen 2003; Saarse et al. 2010).
P a g e | 36
The Alnus decline was different from other decreases in tree pollen values during the
Holocene, because it was sharp and episodic, in most cases was followed by a recovery
after <300 years and the other tree taxa showed no decrease in values during the event. At
Valkea–Kotinen Alnus percentages decline from 6 to 10% before the event to 2–3% during
the event and rise to almost the same level as before the decline. Pollen accumulation data
indicate a rapid decrease in Alnus biomass and that no other tree pollen types declined
during this period (Figure 10). There is no increase in pollen taxa which would indicate
human influence on the vegetation during the decline. Very low rates of Cerealia pollen
occur (Figure 11) but, they do not increase as Alnus pollen declines and no charcoal peak is
present in the sediment record at this time. Thus, the Alnus decline was not associated with
an increase in crop cultivation, forest clearance, fires or other types of human activity. A
credible explanation for the decline must account for the fact that (i) the decline is Alnus
specific, (ii) the decline is episodic, and (iii) the decline is witnessed in many different
environments, including those which were not subject to intense human influence.
In the past, the Alnus decline has been attributed to human influences. Sarmaja–Korjonen
(2003) and Saarse et al. (2010) noted that fire frequency and Cerealia pollen increased
during the decline and claimed that extensive forest–clearing slash–and–burn was necessary
for agriculture purposes. Sarmaja–Korjonen (2003) also claimed that Alnus wood was
needed for specific constructions, as fuel for iron smelting, or for smoking fish and meat
but this explanation does not account for the decline in Alnus in areas where there is no
evidence of human influence. Moreover, a simultaneous decline and subsequent recovery
of populations of one tree species or genus over a large region is an unlikely response to
gradually increasing late Holocene human impact (Davis, 1981; Peglar and Birks, 1993).
P a g e | 37
An abrupt climate event could also explain the Alnus decline. The best recorded episodic
decline of Alnus and other thermophilous tree species was the ‘8.2 ka event’, a cold event at
8200 cal yr BP (Seppä et al. 2007). However, a cold climate between ca. 1400 and 1000 cal
yr BP is not indicated in boreal European high–resolution temperature reconstructions
(Helama et al. 2010; Esper et al. 2012). There is some tree–ring based evidence for a
cooling in some parts of Europe at AD 536–660 (Büntgen et al. 2016) but it is unclear
whether this cold event occurred in boreal Europe (Helama et al. 2017). Even if it did, it
still fails to explain why it would have influenced only the Alnus population and no other,
more thermophilous tree species.
As Alnus is a species that requires wet soils, a decline could be caused by drought. Water
table reconstructions from the Baltic Sea region indicate a dry period during the Alnus
decline (Väliranta et al. 2007; Gałka et al. 2017), if one allows a minor offset due to
uncertainties in radiocarbon–dated sediment sequences (Figure 17). However, a major
Figure 17: Alnus pollen percentages, Alnus accumulation rate and macrocharcoal
accumulation rate from Valkea-Kotinen alongside water table variability from
Kontolanrahka bog, southern Finland (Väliranta et al. 2007). Adapted from Stivrins et al.
(2017).
P a g e | 38
drought should have affected many other tree species so the fact that the decline is specific
to Alnus does not support the climatic explanation. For example, Picea is sensitive to
drought and severe droughts cause high spruce mortality in the boreal forest (Aakala et al.
2011; Lévesque et al. 2013), but there is little change in Picea values throughout the period
of the Alnus decline. Moreover, the soil moisture records show varying humidity and
dryness throughout the late Holocene, and the dry conditions at AD 500–1000 are not
exceptional (Gałka et al. 2017).
A third possible factor which may explain the event is a pathogen outbreak. Such an
outbreak would cause a widespread, synchronous and rapid (10–20 years) decline of a
species influenced by the pathogen (Peglar and Birks, 1993). This is consistent with the
evidence for Alnus decline in this study. Alnus species are sensitive to several fungal
pathogens and an ongoing rapid Alnus population dieback caused by an infection of
Phytophthora alni (P. alni) has been observed since the 1990s in Europe and recently in North
America. P. alni is a fungal disease which causes lethal root and collar rot (Aguayo et al.
2013; Bjelke et al. 2016). In Sweden, a recent survey showed that 28% of 168 Alnus stands
were infected by P. alni, with 45% of the trees in the infected stands showing symptoms of
decline, often followed by trees dying within a few years to decade (Bjelke et al. 2016). P.
alni is a new fungal pathogen complex, which has originated from a recent hybridization
event (Bjelke et al. 2016) and is thus unlikely to be the cause of the medieval Alnus decline.
However, Phytophthora are well–known plant pathogens causing diseases that can affect
Alnus and other tree populations. It is therefore possible that a fungal disease comparable
with the ongoing Phytophthora outbreak may have caused the decline during the medieval
period. To firmly connect the cause of the decline with a pathogen would require finding
direct evidence of the pathogen, such as remains of sexual or asexual propagules or ancient
P a g e | 39
DNA of the pathogen causing the epidemic from the same sediment records as the pollen
data.
P. alni oospores are very thin walled and delicate and it is possible that they are not
preserved in the sediment. Unpublished experiments with Phytophthora oospores indicate
that they do not survive the standard chemical treatment used in pollen analysis, suggesting
that they should be sought from untreated sediment samples (Stivrins et al. 2017). As such,
the episodic and widespread Alnus decline in the boreal forest was most likely caused by
either a drought or pathogen or possibly both, but these explanations remain inconclusive
in the absence of direct evidence.
5.5 PARs vs Percentages as Tools for Detecting Environmental Change
The wide availability and unrivalled detail make pollen and charcoal sediment records an
invaluable source of information about past vegetation and fire regimes. A great number of
pollen studies express taxon in terms of percentages of the total sum of taxa and while
percentage data provide a general overview of the species present and the forest structure,
they do not give an accurate reflection of species population size (Davis et al. 1984;
Prentice 1988).
Percentage data are interdependent. The abundance ratio of one particular species is
dependent on the abundance of the other species. As such the development and
implementation of pollen analyses has, in the past, been hindered by the inherent relative
nature of percentage pollen counts (Davis 2000). Another disadvantage of using percentage
data is that it does not take into account facts such as the difference between pollen
productivity in different species and differences in pollen dispersal through the air (Sugita
P a g e | 40
1994; Broström et al. 2008; Marquer et al. 2014). Percentage pollen data can therefore
misrepresent past vegetation densities and as such have a detrimental effect upon the
reliable and accurate reconstruction of past environments (Davis 2000; Seppä 2013).
To circumvent the inherent problems associated with using percentage data for vegetation
reconstructions, Davis and Deevey (1964) and Davis (1967, 1969) initiated the use of
pollen accumulation rates (PARs) in palaeoecological studies, and began to apply the
technique to lake sediment analysis to more accurately assess vegetation change. PARs are
the calculation of the accumulation of pollen in the sediment, calculated for a specified area
(in this study, per cm2) per year. This results in an individual figure for each pollen or spore
type, so the PAR of a given species is not dependent on the abundance of other taxa and
therefore avoids the problems arising from the interdependent nature of relative records
i.e. percentage values. Pollen accumulation rates are used mainly to identify key species
surrounding a study site (Hicks 2001; Seppä et al. 2002; Seppä and Hicks 2006; Jensen et al.
2007) and as a proxy for measuring and reconstructing past species population growth rates
and fluctuations (MacDonald 1993; Giesecke 2005).
As discussed in 5.1, a disadvantage of the PAR method is that pollen accumulation can
vary greatly within a lake. As such, where possible, it is best to undertake multi–core
analysis to gain the most accurate reflection of vegetation composition and change. Two
other important criteria which must be met when using PAR records for vegetation
reconstruction are; (i) the sediment core must have a reliable chronology, with an adequate
number of dated samples for a consistent age–depth model and (ii) the pollen record must
be sampled at a high temporal resolution to reduce the risk of misinterpretation of the
record if one or more samples reflect an anomalously abundant or sparse PAR value
(Seppä and Hicks 2006).
P a g e | 41
Investigations have shown that PAR data is directly linked to the biomass and, as a result,
the population size of a particular taxon at a study site (Seppä 2006, 2008). As such, PAR
data has, in recent times, been used as a means for reconstructing past tree biomass as in
theory, the changes in PAR for an individual tree species through time reflect the
population abundance for that particular species within the source area of the pollen (Davis
and Deevey 1964; Prentice 1985; Sugita 1994; Mazier et al. 2012; Blarquez and Aleman
2016). The technique is particularly useful for vegetation reconstruction if the area under
investigation is dominated by only a few taxa.
The comparison of modern PAR values with modern biomass values can allow for the
calibration of fossil PAR values to biomass values by assuming a linear relationship
between fossil PAR and biomass values. The calibration usually involves the comparison of
modern pollen samples with standing vegetation using land surveys (Seppä et al. 2009),
trapping protocols (Blarquez et al. 2012), or remote–sensing data (Williams, 2002).
However, the technique is not straightforward and there are some factors which have to be
taken into account when undertaking this method such as careful selection of the lake basin
site, ensuring there is a precise chronology and robust age–depth curve and a careful
assessment of the complex sedimentary processes at work and their effect on pollen
accumulation rates within the study lake (Seppä 2006; Mazier et al. 2012).
In the case of this study, only one of the two criteria for successful PAR calculation and
interpretation has been met. Whilst the sediment core was sampled a high resolution (0.5
cm slices), the chronology for the age–depth model is unlikely to be accurate above 19 cm
(ca. 1000 cal yr BP). As precise dating is vital for biomass reconstructions it is unlikely that
the dating achieved at Valkea–Kotinen would be sufficient for accurate biomass
P a g e | 42
reconstruction. Also, only one core was sampled meaning that whilst the results from this
study are useful for ascertaining the vegetation coverage and general changes over time at a
local and regional scale, the results are not the most accurate representation of the
vegetation dynamics at work throughout the Late Holocene at Valkea–Kotinen.
6. Conclusions
The fossil charcoal and pollen from the Valkea–Kotinen sediment core has given new
insights into the fire and vegetation history of the area over the past ca. 1700 years.
Sediment mixing towards the surface of the core was a problem which resulted in
unsatisfactory 210Pb and 137Cs results. As such the age–depth model on which the core
chronology was based was not as accurate as desired and therefore restricted the precise
reconstruction of fire and vegetation dynamics, particularly after the Alnus pollen
stratigraphic anchor point at 19 cm (ca. 1000 cal yr BP) towards the present day.
Despite this setback, six local fire episodes with an average FRI of 312 years were identified
in the macrocharcoal record using CharAnalysis. Long FRIs are common in natural mesic
spruce forests and as such, along with scarcity of fire episodes, this suggests that these were
natural wildfires rather than due to human activities. There are no identified fire episodes
between around 470 cal yr BP and 15 cal yr BP meaning that macrocharcoal record may
have been affected by sediment mixing as there is evidence of local fire episodes during this
period through fire scar evidence. Macrocharcoal at the surface of the core may be a signal
of controlled burning in the Evo region, 1 km or more away from the site.
P a g e | 43
The pollen record at Valkea–Kotinen has only changed moderately over the past ca. 1700
years with Picea, Alnus, Betula, and Pinus always dominating the site. The main change in
vegetation was the northern European wide decline in Alnus beginning at around 1400 cal
yr BP and although it is speculated that the decline was caused by a drought or as the result
of a pathogen such as Phytophthora alni, the lack of evidence leaves the cause inconclusive.
The microcharcoal record shows increasing values towards the present day, reaching peak
accumulation from around 480 cal yr BP. Evidence of human activity was present
throughout the entire core. Cerealia pollen increased alongside macrocharcoal towards the
present from around 1000 cal yr BP, indicating regional slash and burn cultivation. Aside
from this and the expected negative affect on the fire susceptible species Picea the cross
correlation analysis showed that the fire episodes did not have a significant effect on the
vegetation at the site.
Although the use of PAR data in palaeoecological studies results in a more accurate
reflection of vegetation structure in comparison to pollen percentage data, it is still not
without its caveats. PARs require a robust chronology to ensure accurate environmental
reconstruction. Unfortunately this study does not have a robust chronology but a general
understanding of the vegetation dynamics over time at Valkea–Kotinen has been achieved.
The completion of this research, despite some inaccuracies, at Valkea–Kotinen adds to a
growing understanding of the past fire and vegetation dynamics in southern Finland and
throughout Fennoscandia as a whole.
P a g e | 44
7. Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Heikki Seppä for giving me the opportunity to undertake this research
as part of the EBOR project and to him and Normunds Stivrins for all of their help and
support throughout the research process. Thank you to Ilkka who is always there for me
and of course to Helena for her unending supply of biscuits and banter. In the absence of
any family to thank, I would like to instead thank the Bee Gees for getting me through
some tough times. I would also like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for supporting my
studies financially.
P a g e | 45
8. References
Aakala, T. 2017. EBOR fire records. [email] (Personal communication, 13th September
2017).
Aakala, T., Kuuluvainen, T., Wallenius, T., and Kauhanen, H. 2011. Tree mortality episodes
in the intact Picea abies–dominated taiga in the Arkhangelsk region of northern European
Russia. Journal of Vegetation Science, 22: 322–333.
Aguayo, J., Adams, G. C., Halkett, F., Catal, M., Husson, C., Nagy, Z. Á., Marçais, B., and
Frey, P. 2013. Strong genetic differentiation between North American and European
populations of Phytophthora alni subsp. uniformis. Phytopathology, 103: 190–199.
Ahti, T., Hämet–Ahti, L., and Jalas, J. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in
northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici, 5: 169–211.
Alenius, T., Mikkola, E., Ojala, A. 2008. History of agriculture in Mikkeli Orijärvi, eastern
Finland as reflected by palynological and archaeological data. Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany, 17: 171–183.
Anderson, R. S., Davis, R. B., Miller N. G., and Stuckenrath, R. 1986. History of late– and
post–glacial vegetation and disturbance around Upper South Branch Pone. Northern
Maine. Canadian Journal of Botany, 64: 1977–1986.
Appleby, P. G. 2008. Three decades of dating recent sediments by fallout radionuclides: A
review. The Holocene, 18: 83–93.
Appleby, P. G., 2001. Chronostratigraphic techniques in recent sediments. In, Last, W. M.
and Smol, J. P. (eds.). Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments. Volume 1:
P a g e | 46
Basin Analysis, Coring, and Chronological Techniques. Pp. 171–203. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Appleby, P. G. 1997. Dating recent sediments by 210Pb: problems and solutions. In,
Dating of sediments and determination of sedimentation rate, Proceedings of a seminar
held in Helsinki 2–3 April 1997. STUK.
Bahrenberg, G., Giese, G., and Nipper, J. 1992. Statistiche Methoden in der Geographie.
Band 2, Multivariate Statistik. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany.
Bennett, K. D., and Willis, K. 2003. Pollen analysis. In, Smol, J. P., Birks, H. J. B., and Last,
W. M. (eds.). Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments. Volume 3:
Terrestrial, Algal and Siliceous Indicators. Pp. 5–32. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Bergström, I. 1995. Location and selection criteria for the monitoring areas. In, Bergström,
I., Mäkelä, K., and Starr, M. (eds.). Integrated Monitoring Programme in Finland. First
National Report. Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Policy Department,
Helsinki. Report 1: 15–16.
Bjelke, U., Boberg, J., Oliva, J., Tattersdill, K., and Mckie, B. G. 2016. Dieback of riparian
alder caused by the Phytophthora alni complex: projected consequences for stream
ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 61: 565–579.
Blaauw, M. 2010. Methods and code for ‘classical’ age–modelling of radiocarbon
sequences. Quaternary Geochronology, 5: 512–518.
Blarquez, O., and Aleman, J. C. 2016. Tree biomass reconstruction shows no lag in
postglacial afforestation of eastern Canada. Canadian Journal for Research, 46: 485–498.
P a g e | 47
Blarquez, O., Carcaillet, C., Elzein, T. M., and Roiron, P. 2012. Needle accumulation rate
model–based reconstruction of palaeo–tree biomass in the western subalpine Alps.
Holocene, 22 (5): 579–587.
Bradshaw, R. H. W., Lindbladh, M., and Hannon, G. E. 2010. The role of fire in southern
Scandinavian forests during the late Holocene. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19:
1040–1049.
Bradshaw, R. H. W. 1993. Tree species dynamics and disturbance in three Swedish boreal
forest stands during the last two thousand years. Journal of Vegetation Science, 4: 759–764.
Broström, A., Nielsen, A. B., Gaillard, M–J., Hjelle, K., Mazier, F., Binney, H., Bunting, J.,
Fyfe, R., Meltsov, V., Poska, A., Räsänen, S., Soepboer, W., von Stedingk, H., Suutari, H.,
and Sugita, S. 2008. Pollen productivity estimates of key European plant taxa for
quantitative reconstruction of past vegetation: a review. Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany, 17: 461–478.
Büntgen, U., Myglan, V. S., Ljungqvist, F. C., McCormick, M., Di Cosma, N., Sigl, M.,
Jungclaus, J., Wagner, S., Krusic, P. J., Esper, J., Kaplan, J. O., de Vaan, M. A. C.,
Luterbacher, J., Wacker, L., Tegel, W., and Kirdyanov, A. V. 2016. Cooling and societal
change during the Late Antique Little Ice Age from 536 to around 660 AD. Nature
Geoscience, 9: 231–236.
Cajander, A. K. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 56: 1–71.
Clark, J. S., Lynch, J., Stocks, B. J., and Goldammer, J. G. 1998. Relationships between
charcoal particles in air and sediments in west–central Siberia. Holocene, 8: 19–29.
P a g e | 48
Clark, J. S. 1989. Ecological disturbance as a renewal process: theory and application to fire
history. Oikos, 56: 17–30.
Clear, J. L., Seppä, H., Kuosmanen, N., and Bradshaw, R. H. W. 2015. Holocene stand–
scale vegetation dynamics and fire history of an old–growth spruce forest in southern
Finland. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 24 (6): 731–741.
Clear, J. L., Seppä, H., Kuosmanen, N., and Bradshaw, R. H. W. 2013. Holocene fire
frequency variability in Vesijako, Strict Nature Reserve, Finland, and its application to
conservation and management. Biological Conservation, 166: 90–97.
Colombaroli, D., Vanniere, B., Emmanuel, C., Magny, M., and Tinner, W. 2008. Fire–
vegetation interactions during the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition at Lago dell’Accesa,
Tuscany, Italy. The Holocene, 18: 679–692.
Critchfield, H. J. 1966. General climatology, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.
Davis, M. B. 2000. Palynology after Y2K – Understanding the source area of pollen in
sediments. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 28: 1–18.
Davis, M. B., Moelle, R. E., and Ford, J. 1984. Sediment focusing and pollen influx. In,
Haworth, E. Y. and Lund, V. W. G. (eds.). Lake Sediments and Environmental History,
Publisher: University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Pp. 261–293.
Davis, M. B. 1981. Outbreaks of forest pathogens in Quaternary history. In, Proceedings of
IV International Palynological Conference, Lucknow (1976–77). 3: 216–228.
P a g e | 49
Davis, M. B. 1969. Climatic changes in Southern Connecticut recorded by pollen
deposition at Rogers Lake. Ecology, 50: 409–422.
Davis, M. B. 1967. Pollen accumulation rates at Rogers Lake, Connecticut, during Late and
Postglacial time. Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology, 2: 219–230.
Davis, M. B., and Deevey, E. S. Jr. 1964. Pollen Accumulation Rates: Estimates from Late–
Glacial Sediment of Rogers Lake. Science, 145: 1293–1295.
Engelmark, O. 1984. Forest fires in the Muddus National Park (northern Sweden) during
the past 600 years. Canadian Journal of Botany, 62: 893–989.
Esper, J., Büntgen, U., Timonen, M., and Frank, D. C. 2012. Variability and extremes of
northern Scandinavian summer temperatures over the past two millennia. Global and
Planetary Change, 88–89: 1–9.
Esri. 2017. Finland Topographic Map. [online] Available at:
http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=dc2b305cb35945e89525b2
642e9c1b5d [Accessed 14th October 2017].
Eurola, S., Hicks, S., and Kaakinen, E. 1984. Key to Finnish mire types. In, Moore, P.
(ed.). European mires. Pp. 11–117. Academic Press, London.
Gałka, M., Tobolski, K., Lamentowicz, Ł., Ersek, V., Jassey, V. E. J., van der Knap, W. O.,
and Lamentowicz, M.. 2017. Unveiling exceptional Baltic bog ecohydrology, autogenic
succession and climate change during the last 2000 years in CE Europe using replicate
cores, multi–proxy data and functional traits of testate amoebae. Quaternary Science
Reviews, 156: 90–106.
P a g e | 50
Gavin, D. G., Hallett, D. J., Hu, F. S., Lertzman, K. P., Prichard, S. J., Brown, K. J., Lynch,
J. A., Bartlein, P., and Peterson, D. L. 2007. Forest fire and climate change in western
North America: Insights from sediment charcoal records. Frontiers in Ecology and the
Environment, 5 (9): 499–506.
Gavin, D. G., Hu, F. S., Lertzman, K., and Corbett, P. 2006. Weak climatic control of
stand– scale fire history during the late Holocene. Ecology, 87: 1722–1732.
Gavin, D. G., Brubaker, L. B., and Lertzman, K. P. 2003. An 1800–year record of the
spatial and temporal distribution of fire from the west coast of Vancouver Island, Canada.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 573–586.
Giesecke, T., and Fontana, S. L. 2008. Revisiting pollen accumulation rates from Swedish
lake sediments. Holocene, 18: 293–305.
Giesecke, T. 2005. Moving front or population expansion: how did Picea abies (L.) Karst.
become frequent in central Sweden? Quaternary Science Reviews, 24: 2495–509.
Green, D. G. 1983. The ecological interpretation of fine resolution pollen records. New
Phytologist, 94: 459–477.
Green, D. G. 1981. Time series and postglacial forest ecology. Quaternary Research, 15:
265–277.
Grimm EC (2015) TILIA and TILIA.GRAPH. Springfield, Illinois State Museum.
Haapanen, A., and Siitonen, P. 1978. Kulojen esiintyminen Ulvinsalon luonnonpuistossa.
Summary: Forest fires in Ulvinsalo strict nature reserve. Silva Fennica, 12: 187–200.
P a g e | 51
Halme, P., Allen, K. A., Auniᶇš. Bradshaw, R. H. W., Brūmelisd, G., Čada, V., Clear, J. L.,
Eriksson, A–M., Hannon, G., Hyvärinen, E., Ikauniece, S., Iršėnaitėi, R., Jonsson, B. G.,
Junninen, K., Kareksela, S., Komonen, A., Kotiaho, J. S. Kouki, J., Kuuluvainen, T.,
Mazziotta, A., Mönkkönen, M., Nyholm, K., Oldén, A., Shorohova, E., Strange, N.,
Toivanen, T., Vanha–Majamaa, I., Wallenius, T., Ylisirnö, A–L., and Zin, E. 2013.
Challenges of ecological restoration: Lessons from forests in northern Europe. Biological
Conservation, 167: 248–256.
HAMK. 2016. Layman Report. Evo–Life Project. HAMK University of Applied Sciences.
Heikinheimo, O. 1915. Kaskivikjelyn vaikutus Suonen metsiin. Metsähallituksen julkaisuja,
2: 1–264.
Helama, S., Jones, P. D., and Briffa, K. R. 2017. Limited Late Antique cooling. Nature
Geoscience, 10: 242–243.
Helama, S., Macias–Fauria, M., Mielikäinen, K., Timonen, M., and Eronen, M. 2010. Sub–
Milankovitch solar forcing of past climates: mid and late Holocene perspectives. Geological
Society of America Bulletin, 122: 1981–1988.
Hicks, S. 2001. The use of annual arboreal pollen deposition values for delimiting tree–lines
in the landscape and exploring models of pollen dispersal. Review of Palaeobotany and
Palynology, 117: 1–29.
Higuera, P. E., Gavin, D. G., Bartlein, P. J., and Hallett. D. J. 2010. Peak detection in
sediment–charcoal records: impacts of alternative data analysis methods on fire–history
interpretations. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19: 996–1014.
P a g e | 52
Higuera, P. E., Brubaker, L. B., Anderson, P.M., Hu, F. S., and Brown T.A. 2009.
Vegetation mediated the impacts of postglacial climatic change on fire regimes in the
south–central Brooks Range, Alaska. Ecological Monographs, 79: 201–219.
Higuera, P. E., Peters, M. E., Brubaker, L. A., and Gavin, D. G. 2007. Understanding the
origin and analysis of sediment–charcoal records with a simulation model. Quaternary
Science Reviews, 26: 1790–1809.
Higuera, P. E., Sprugel, D. G., and Brubaker, L. N. 2005. Reconstructing fire regimes with
charcoal from small–hollow sediments: a calibration with tree–ring records of fire. The
Holocene, 15 (2): 238–251.
Huttunen, P. 1980. Early land use, especially the slash–and–burn cultivation in the
commune of Lammi, southern Finland, interpreted mainly using pollen and charcoal
analysis. Acta Botanica Fennica, 113: 1–45.
Huurre, M. 2003. Viljanviljelyn varhaisvaiheet. In, V. Rasila, E. Jutikkala & A. Mäkelä–
Alitalo eds. Suomen maatalouden historia 1. Perinteisen Maatalouden aika esihistoriasta
1870–luvulle. Jyväskylä: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden. Seura. P.p. 19–37.
Hämet–Ahti, L. 1989. The main features of Finnish vegetation. In, Alalammi, P. (ed.). Atlas
of Finland. National Board of Survey, Geographical Society of Finland. Folio 141–143,
Vegetation and Flora. Pp. 1–2.
Hörnberg, G., Zackrisson, O., Segerström, U., Svensson, B. W., Ohlson, M., and
Bradshaw, R. H. W. 1998. Boreal swamp forests. BioScience 48 (10): 795–802.
Jensen, C., Vorren, K. D., and Mörkved, B. 2007. Annual pollen accumulation rate (PAR)
at the boreal and alpine forest–line of northwestern Norway, with special emphasis on
P a g e | 53
Pinus sylvestris and Betula pubescens. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 144: 337–
61.
Jylhä, K., Laapas, M., Ruosteenoja, K., Arvola, L., Drebs, A., Kersalo, J., Saku, S., Gregow,
H., Hannula, H–R., and Pirinen, P. 2013. Climate variability and trends in the Valkea–
Kotinen region, southern Finland: comparisons between the past, current and projected
climates. Boreal Environment Research, 19 (Supp. A): 4–30.
Jylhä, K., Tuomenvirta, H., Ruosteenoja, K., Niemi–Hugaerts, H., Keisu, K. and Karhu, J.
A. 2010. Observed and projected future shifts of climatic zones in Europe, and their use to
visualize climate change information. Weather, Climate, and Society, 2: 148–167.
Lehtonen, H., and Kolström, T. 2000. Forest fire history in Viena Karelia, Russia.
Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15: 585–590.
Lempinen, J. 2017. Discussion on 210Pb results. [email] (Personal communication, 25th
January 2017).
Lévesque, M., Saurer, M., Siegwolf, R., Eilmann, B., Brang, P., Bugmann, H., and Rigling,
A. 2013. Drought response of five conifer species under contrasting water availability
suggests high vulnerability of Norway spruce and European larch. Global Change Biology,
19: 3184–3199.
Lindholm, T., and Vasander, H. 1987. Vegetation and stand development of mesic forest
after prescribed burning. Silva Fennica, 21 (3): 259–278.
Long, C. J., Whitlock, C., Bartlein, P. J., and Millspaugh, S. H. 1998. A 9000–year fire
history from the Oregon Coast Range, based on a high–resolution charcoal study.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 774–782.
P a g e | 54
Luoto, T. P., Sarmaja–Korjonen, K., Nevalainen, L., and Kauppila, T. 2009. A 700 year
record of temperature and nutrient changes in a small eutrophied lake in southern Finland.
The Holocene, 19 (7): 1063–1072.
Lynch, J. A., Clark, J. S., and Stocks, B. J. 2004. Charcoal production, dispersal and
deposition from the Fort Providence experimental fire: interpreting fire regimes from
charcoal records in boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34: 1642–1656.
MacDonald, G. M. 1993. Fossil pollen analysis and the reconstruction of plant invasions.
Advances in Ecological Research, 24: 67–109.
Marquer, L., Gaillard, M–J., Sugita, S., Trondman, A–K., Mazier, F., Nielsen, A. B., Fyfe, R.
M., Vad Odgaard, B., Alenius, T., Birks, H. J. B., Bjune, A. E., Christiansen, J., Dodson, J.,
Edwards, K. J., Giesecke, T., Herzschuh, U., Kangur, M., Lorenz, S., Poska, A., Schult, M.,
and Seppä, H. 2014. Holocene changes in vegetation composition in northern Europe: why
quantitative pollen based vegetation reconstructions matter. Quaternary Science Reviews,
90: 199–216.
Mazier, F., Nielsen, A. B., Broström, A., Sugita, S., and Hicks, S. 2012. Signals of tree
volume and temperature in a high–resolution record of pollen accumulation rates in
northern Finland. Journal of Quaternary Science, 27 (6): 564–574.
Metla. 2012. State of Finland's Forests 2012: Criterion 4 Biological diversity: Tree species
composition (4.1). [online] Available at: http://www.metla.fi/metinfo/sustainability/c4–
tree–species.htm [Accessed 01 October 2017].
Metla. 2012a. State of Finland's Forests 2012: Finnish forests and forest management in a
nutshell: History of forest management. [online] Available at:
P a g e | 55
http://www.metla.fi/metinfo/sustainability/SF–1–history–of–forest.htm [Accessed 01
October 2017].
Metsähallitus. 2017. History and Sights of Evo Hiking Area. [online] Available at:
http://www.nationalparks.fi/en/evo/historyandsights [Accessed 17th September 2017].
Mäkelä, K. 1995. Valkea–Kotinen: General Features of the monitoring area. In, Bergström,
I., Mäkelä, K., and Starr, M. (eds.). lntegrated Monitoring Programme in Finland. First
National Report. Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Policy Department,
Helsinki. Report 1: 16–18.
National Land Survey of Finland. 2017. MML Kartta–Paika. [online] Available at:
https://asiointi.maanmittauslaitos.fi/karttapaikka/jaa–paikka [Accessed 19th September
2017].
Niinioja, R., and Villa, L. 1995. Valkea–Kotinen: The Lake. In, Bergström, I., Mäkelä, K.,
and Starr, M. (eds.). lntegrated Monitoring Programme in Finland. First National Report.
Ministry of the Environment, Environmental Policy Department, Helsinki. Report 1: 20.
Niklasson, M., and Granström, A. 2000. Numbers and sizes of fires: long–term spatially
explicit fire history in a Swedish boreal landscape. Ecology, 81: 1484–1499.
O’Connell, M., Ghilardi, B., and Morrison, L. 2014. A 7000–year record of environmental
change, including early farming impact, based on lake–sediment geochemistry and pollen
data from County Sligo, western Ireland. Quaternary Research, 81: 35–49.
Ohlson, M., Brown, K. J., Birks, H. J. B., Grytnes, J–A., Hörberg, G., Niklasson, M.,
Seppä, H., and Bradshaw, R. H. W. 2011. Invasion of Norway spruce diversifies the fire
regime in boreal European forests. Journal of Ecology, 99: 395–403.
P a g e | 56
Oris, F., Ali, A. A., Asselin, H., Paradis, L., Bergeron, Y. and Finsinger, W. 2014. Charcoal
dispersion and deposition in boreal lakes from 3 years of monitoring: Differences between
local and regional fires, Geophysical Research Letters, 41: 6743–6752.
Parviainen, J. 1996. Impact of fire on Finnish forest in the past and today. Silva Fennica, 30
(2–3): 353–359.
Peglar, S. M., and Birks, H. J. B. 1993. The mid–Holocene Ulmus fall at Diss Mere, South–
East England – disease and human impact? Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2: 61–
68.
Pidek, I. A., Piotrowska, K., and Kasprzyk, I. 2010. Pollen–vegetation relationships for
pine and spruce in southeast Poland on the basis of volumetric and Tauber trap records. 49
(3): 215–226.
Pitkänen, A., Huttunen, P., Tolonen, K., and Junger, H. 2003. Long–term fire frequency in
spruce–dominated forests of the Ulvinsalo Strict Nature Reserve, Finland. Forest Ecology
and Management, 176 (1–3): 305–319.
Pitkänen, A., Huttunen, P., Jungner, H. and Tolonen, K. 2002. A 10000 year local fire
history in a dry heath forest site in eastern Finland, reconstructed from charcoal layer
records of a small mire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32: 1875–1880.
Pitkänen, A., and Huttunen, P. 1999. A 1300–year forest–fire history at a site in eastern
Finland based on charcoal and pollen records in laminated lake sediments. Holocene, 9:
311–320.
P a g e | 57
Prentice C. 1988. Records of vegetation in time and space: the principles of pollen analysis.
In, Huntley B., and Webb, T. (eds.). Vegetation history. Handbook of vegetation science,
Volume 7. P.p. 17–42. Springer, Dordrecht.
Prentice, I. C. 1985. Pollen representation, source area, and basin size: toward a unified
theory of pollen analysis. Quaternary Research, 23: 76–86.
Rassi, P. et al. 2003. Committee Report on Forest Restoration in Finland. Ministry of the
Environment, Finland.
Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., Bronk Ramsey, C., Buck,
C.E., Cheng, H., Edwards, R.L., Friedrich, M., Grootes, P.M., Guilderson, T.P.,
Haflidason, H., Hajdas, I., Hatté, C., Heaton, T.J., Hoffmann, D.L., Hogg, A.G., Hughen,
K.A., Kaiser, K.F., Kromer, B., Manning, S.W., Niu, M., Reimer, R.W., Richards, D.A.,
Scott, E.M., Southon, J.R., Staff, R.A., Turney, C.S.M., and van der Plicht, J., 2013.
IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal.
Radiocarbon, 55: 1869–1887.
Renberg, I., and Hansson, H. 2008. The HTH sediment corer. Journal of Palaeolimnology,
40: 655–659.
Ruuttula–Vasari, A. 2004. “Herroja on epäiltävä aina– Metsäherroja yli kaiken”
Metsähallituksen ja pohjoissuomalaisten kanssakäyminen kruununmetsissävuosina 1851–
1900. Summary: “Beware of fine gentlemen – and of foresters most of all”: Contacts
between the people of Northern Finland and the Forestry Board over administration of the
crown forests in the years 1851–1900. PhD thesis, Department of History, University of
Oulu, Oulu.
P a g e | 58
Ryan, K. C. 2002. Dynamic interactions between forest structure and fire behavior in
boreal ecosystems. Silva Fennica, 36 (1): 13–39.
Saarse, L., Niinemets, E., Poska, A, and Veski, S. 2010. Is there a relationship between crop
farming and the Alnus decline in the eastern Baltic region? Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany, 19: 17–28.
Sarmaja–Korjonen, K. 2003. Contemporaneous Alnus decline and the beginning of Iron
Age cultivation in pollen stratigraphies from southern Finland. Vegetation History and
Archaeobotany, 12: 49–59.
Sarmaja–Korjonen, K. 1992. Fine–interval pollen and charcoal analyses as tracers of early
clearance periods in S Finland . Acta Botanica Fennica 146: 1–75.
Seppä, H. ,2013. Pollen Analysis, Principles. In, Elias S. A. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of
Quaternary Science, vol. 3. Pp. 794–804. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Seppä, H., Alenius, T., Muukkonen, P., Giesecke, T., Miller, P. A., and Ojala, A. E. K.
2009. Calibrated pollen accumulation rates as a basis for quantitative tree biomass
reconstructions. Holocene, 19: 209–220.
Seppä, H., Alenius, T., Muukkonen, P., Giesecke, T., Miller, P. A. and Ojala, A. E. K. 2008.
Calibrated pollen accumulation rates as a basis for quantitative tree biomass
reconstructions. The Holocene, 19 (2): 209–220.
Seppä H, Birks HJB, Giesecke T et al. 2007. Spatial structure of the 8200 cal yr BP event in
northern Europe. Climate of the Past, 3: 225–236.
P a g e | 59
Seppä, H., and Hicks, S. 2006. Integration of modern and past pollen accumulation rate
(PAR) records across the arctic tree–line: a method for more precise vegetation
reconstructions. Quaternary Science Reviews, 25: 1501–16.
Seppä, H., Nyman, M., Korhola, A., and Weckström, J. 2002. Changes of tree–lines and
alpine vegetation in relation to post–glacial climate dynamics in northern Fennoscandia
based on pollen and chironomid records. Journal of Quaternary Science, 17: 287–301.
Solantie R. 2005. Productivity of boreal forests in relation to climate and vegetation zones.
Boreal Environmental Research, 10: 275–297.
Stivrins, N., Buchan, M. S., Disbrey, H. R., Kuosmanen, N., Latałowa, M., Lempinen, J.,
Muukkonen, P., Słowiński, M., Veski, S., and Seppä, H. 2017. Widespread, episodic decline
of alder (Alnus) during the medieval period in the boreal forest of Europe. Journal of
Quaternary Science, 32: 903–907.
Stockmarr, J. 1971. Tablets with spores used in absolute pollen analysis. Pollen et Spores,
13: 615–621.
Stocks, B. J., Goldammer, J. G., and Kondrashov, L. 2008. Forest Fires and Fire
Management in the Circumboreal Zone: Past Trends and Future Uncertainties.
International Model Forest Network. Discussion Paper No. 01.
Sugita, S. 1994. Pollen Representation of Vegetation in Quaternary Sediments: Theory and
Method in Patchy Vegetation. Journal of Ecology, 82 (4): 881–897.
Swain, A. M. 1978. Environmental changes during the past 2000 years in North–central
WisconsIn, analysis of pollen, charcoal, and seeds from varved lake sediments. Quaternary
Research, 10: 55–68.
P a g e | 60
Swain, A. M. 1973. A history of fire and vegetation in northeastern Minnesota as recorded
in lake sediments. Quaternary Research, 3: 383–396.
Tanskanen, H. 2007. Fuel conditions and fire behavior characteristic of managed Picea
abies and Pinus sylvestris forests in Finland. Dissertationes Forestales 40, University of
Helsinki, Finland.
Tinner, W., Hubschmid, P., Wehrli, M., Ammann, B., and Conedera, M. 1999. Long–term
forest ecology and dynamics in southern Switzerland. Journal of Ecology, 87: 273–289.
Tuominen, S. 1990. Kotisten aarniometsän metsähistoria ja puustorakennetyypit. M. Sc.
thesis, University of Helsinki. 77 p.
Väliranta, M., Korhola, A., Seppä, H., Tuittila, E–S., Sarmaja–Korjonen, K., Laine, J., and
Alm, J. 2007. High–resolution reconstruction of wetness dynamics in a southern boreal
raised bog, Finland, during the Late Holocene: a quantitative approach. The Holocene, 17:
1093–1107.
Wallenius, T. 2011. Major decline in fires in coniferous forests – Reconstructing the
phenomenon and seeking for the cause. Silva Fennica, 45: 139–155.
Wallenius, T.H. 2002. Forest age distribution and traces of past fires in a natural Boreal
landscape dominated by Picea abies. Silva Fennica, 36: 201–211.
Whitlock, C., and Larsen, C. 2001. Charcoal as a fire proxy. In, Smol, J. P., Birks, H. J. B.,
and Last, W. M. (eds.). Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments. Volume 3:
Terrestrial, Algal and Siliceous Indicators. Pp. 75–97. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
P a g e | 61
Whitlock, C., and Millspaugh, S. H., 1996. Testing the assumptions of fire–history studies:
an examination of modern charcoal accumulation in Yellowstone National Park, USA.
Holocene, 6: 7–15.
Williams, J. W. 2002. Variations in tree cover in North America since the last glacial
maximum. Global and Planetary Change, 35 (1): 1–23.
Zackrisson, O. 1977. Influence of forest fires on the North Swedish boreal forest. Oikos,
29: 22–32.