LandWarNet 2011 - AFCEA · PDF fileunclassified landwarnet 2011 unclassified transforming cyber while at war session 5, track 6 (c4isr me) cpof tigr corps div bct bn co plt sqd/sldr

LANDWARNET 2011UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

TRANSFORMING CYBER WHILE AT WAR

LandWarNet 2011

Session 5Cyber Interoperability / Information

Assurance Efforts and Lessons Learned

24 Aug 2011 – 1615-1730CTSF Technical Director

1Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2011-08-24 //Current Interoperability/IA Efforts


UNCLASSIFIED


Transforming Cyber Capabilities through System of Systems Interoperability and Integration Efforts

•Afghanistan Mission Network (AMN) / Coalition Interoperability Assurance and Validation (CIAV) Working Group (WG)

•Air Ground Integrated Layer Exploration (AGILE) Fire Exercise

•Joint On-demand Interoperability Network (JOIN) / Joint Users Interoperability Communications Exercise (JUICE)

•Host Based Security System (HBSS) Pilot

•Questions

Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts 2


UNCLASSIFIED


Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)

CPOF

TIGR

Corps

DIV

BCT

BN

CO

PLT

SQD/SLDR

117 G

7800W117 G

7800W

WIN-TV-SAT

(CSS)

WIN-T

WIN-T

WIN-T

DTCS

V-SAT

(CSS)

V-SAT

(CSS)

Trojan

Spirit

GBS

SNAP

Iridium

L-BandKU

SNAP

GBSTrojan

Spirit

Trojan

Spirit

GBS BFT

BFT

BFT

BFT

BFT

BFT

117 G GRRIP

Inmarsat

DCGS-A

AFATDS

SINCGARS EPLRS

EPLRS

EPLRS

EPLRS

EPLRS

BCS GCCS-A

CIDNE

National / International BFT NOC

BCS 3SVR

BCS 3

BATs/Hide

CPOF

DCGS-A

AFATDS

BCS GCCS-A

CIDNE

BCS 3

CPOF

DCGS-A

ADAM

AFATDS

BCS

BCS 3

CPOF

DCGS-A

AFATDS

BCS

BCS 3

TIGR

TIGR

TIGR

Transport Layer LandWarNet Applications COTs Applications

WNWSINCGARS

SINCGARS

SINCGARS

WNW

SRW

SRW

FBCB2

FBCB2

FBCB2

FBCB2

FBCB2

FBCB2

FBCB2

DCGS-A

FOS

FOS

FOS BFT

CPOF

CPOF

VOIP Chat

Web

VTC

Email

FMV

VOIP Chat

Web

VTC

Email

FMV

VOIP Chat

Web

VTC

Email

FMV

VOIP Chat

Web

VTC

Email

FMV

Chat

Web Email

Chat

Web Email

Chat

MS Office

MS Office

MS Office

MS Office

MS Office

MS Office

VOIP

Representative of multiple air/ground platforms

Data

Initialization

Security

HBSS

HBSS

GBS

ADAM

ADAM

32001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts

http://www.army-technology.com/projects/mlrs/mlrs1.html

http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/images/rq-7_shadow_01.jpg

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/images/m109a6_911872.jpg

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/images/AN-TPQ-36_960420-A-3327S-006.jpg


UNCLASSIFIED


AMN faces many of the same interoperability challenges as current

force LWN/BC:

• Many individual Systems (Program Managers (PMs))

• Geographically distributed operations across theaters (CONUS/OCONUS)

• Foreign Military Sales - technical information/data exchange issues

• Increasing number of systems that must interoperate

• Complex network architecture

• Increasing complexity of software and number of interfaces

• Limited Coalition-wide SoS engineering and access to SoS Integration

Environments

• Loosely defined requirements and standards

• Loosely defined overarching SoS Architecture

• Lack of adequate documentation

• Requirement for rapid delivery in response to operational Warfighter

requests

• Increased security due to emerging threats

• Language and cultural differences

Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME) 42001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts


UNCLASSIFIED


CTSF is part of the CIAV Working Group focused on mission-based interoperability and integration for the Afghanistan Mission Network (AMN)

Interoperability at the Command and Control and battle management layer (EN, Apps and Services) are among the predominant challenges facing the AMN

CIAV Key Goals:

• Validate Coalition Tactics, Techniques, & Procedures

• Streamline integration of current and new information exchange processes

• Provide feedback loop to training



UNCLASSIFIED


Issue: United Kingdom (UK) received reports from Afghanistan on the validity of UK ground track data on a Regional Command (RC) COP via CPOF

Cause: UK believes the issue is a result of delays within the current architecture flow of UK ground track data to CPOF

Action:

•UK asked the CIAV WG to support a series of alternative data flow tests to assess their viability of timely track data to CPOF; and no negative impacts to the AMN architecture

•With PMs’ onsite technical support, CTSF quickly reconfigured to support UK’s efforts

Outcome: UK is currently assessing the test data to validate one of the COAs that resolves the issue



UNCLASSIFIED


Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME) 7

CTE2Coalition Test & Evaluation

Environment Representative

of AMN

AMN

CFBLNet

Evaluate and resolve existing

operational issues

2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts

http://www.theodora.com/flags

http://www.theodora.com/flags_12b.html

http://www.theodora.com/flags


UNCLASSIFIED


Develop and validate improved Joint Fires mission TTPs

Explores joint system interoperability procedures and

information exchange requirements within and between

space, air, and ground domains to execute operationally

realistic missions

Examines Joint Fires/airspace integration and integrated

air picture planning, operations, and management

Interoperability analysis based upon mission threads

Air Force asked CTSF to join AGILE Fire events because

of its System-of-Systems (SoS) interoperability expertise,

lab scalability, and distributed-site networking capability



UNCLASSIFIED


Warfighter Problem:

Solution:

Objectives:

• Determine if systems used in the JAGIC are effective in the execution of Joint Fires and Airspace Command and Control

• Determine if JAGIC systems provide a complete, timely, and accurate air-ground COP

Currently there is no single C2 authority facilitating integration of air-ground operations at the tactical level

• Develop modular and scalable C2 cell

• Incorporate TACP personnel with the ground element

• Increased shared situational awareness and C2

EMT

AF4

Joint Air Request Net

(JARN) Operator

Air force

A5

ADA

Controller

Army

AF1

SAD

Air

Force

A1

FSCOORD

Army

A2

FSO

Army

AFATDS

TAIS

TBMCS Client

ADSI

w/TACVIEW

TACP-CASS

PASS Server

FAAD-C2

GCCS-A / C2PC CPOF

AMDWS

JADOCS

Server

JADOCS

&TBMCS

Client

NUTTCP

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

AF2

Airspace

Manager

Air Force

MCS

InterTEC

Collaborative

Tool Suite

JADOCS &

TBMCS

Client

A6

Airspace

Manager

Army

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

A3

FSNCO

Army

AF3

Procedural

Controller

Air Force

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

A4

Air Defense

Manager

Army

MDV,

Chat &

VoIP

9Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts


UNCLASSIFIED


JAGIC concept shortens Joint Fires decision-making process

JAGIC approved for implementation in OEF

Validated first-ever Joint Air Ground Integration Cell (JAGIC) at Div Main

Validated co-located systems provide a more timely and accurate air-ground COP

Developed improved Surface Fires and JCAS TTPs , and Joint Fires doctrine

Integrated VoIP and Joint Chat tools for Pilot-to-TOC comms



UNCLASSIFIED


LandWarNet 2011

Session 5: Joint On-demand Interoperability

Network (JOIN)

Joint Users Interoperability

Communications Exercise (JUICE)

Software Engineering Center



UNCLASSIFIED


JUICE Purpose

• Building on the theme of Cyber Initiatives such as CTSF Agile Fires

• Joint and Coalition exercise focusing on Joint Interoperability and development and validation of TTP’s

• Focus on operational gaps and issues that have been indentified throughout the year by COCOM’s Services and agencies

• Synergizes technical, test, operational and acquisition communities

• Align JOIN in support Commander’s intent with BRAC

12

"JUICE provides a uniquely important exercise environment allowing our

joint service members access to the latest technology and experts,

providing training on state-of-the-art capabilities that can be deployed in

support of our CONUS/OCONUS missions in addition to DoD support to

our state and federal agencies” COL Christopher A. Hegarty

Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts


UNCLASSIFIED


JUICE 11: Employed Air Force Cyber Team to ensure Network Integrity

• Stood up Net Defense at three different locations of the JUICE network

• Incorporated as part of the JNCC reporting and Battle Rhythm

• HBSS Testing to assess policy pushes in a Tactical Environment

Instituted stringent IA policy at each participating site• Required submissions of IA scans, ATO/IATO and consent to monitor for

each site

• Configured S/W settings to allow retina servers to pass scan results

UC Tactical Pilot• Implement PKI authentication

Employed computer network defense concepts/devices (KG-250) to protect network systems



UNCLASSIFIED


Expeditionary Communications (Recommended at Fort Bragg Haiti AAR/J6 summit)

• Assess small expeditionary communications packages

“small enough to get in and big enough to win the battle”

• Validate JNN to Teleport connection TTP

• Training for non-standard connection (214th Fires Bde)

Deployed Joint Task Force Initial communications Suite (42nd CBCS)

• Provide initial JTF communications package

• Trained on Joint Network Control Center, Power and HAMAT

Fires Mission (Fort Sill Create multi-layered Fires Control )

• Brigade/Battalion/Battery fire echelons replicated with AFATDS

• Forward Observer cell at APG using Mark VII Laser Rangefinder

• JUICE fires mission fired x23 155mm rounds at APG

• Successful coalition call for live fire from US (APG) and Med-EVAC via Radio over IP from Norway and Sweden



UNCLASSIFIED


Tactical Unified Capabilities Pilot• Phase II of Tactical UC pilot to access tactical connection

to new DISN EoIP GIG II backbone• Validate Service individual system operational capability and document

to JTTP site• Review and modify SAR/GAR process and develop TTP

Coalition Interoperability Communications Exercise (C-ICE)• Execute voice and data comms including call for fire, NBC and MedEvac

using Joint Variable Message Format• Utilize NATO STANAG 4637 and Standard Interoperability Points for

multinational to US C2 connectivity with Radio over IP (RoIP), US, UK, CA, Sweden and Norway

Edgewood Chemical Biological Center (ECBC)

• Examine uses of tactical radio systems, such as SINCGARS and EPLRS to route NBC warning and reporting message traffic

• Explore automated NBC sensor data distribution through various echelons of the command structure

• Built Collaboration between C4ISR community and ECBC15Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts


UNCLASSIFIED


16

Quonset Point, RI

JISCC

Picatinny, NJ

ARDEC

Fort Gordon, GA

NSC-R

Robins AFB, GA

AFFOR HQ:

5 Combat Comms Group

MacDill AFB, FL

DISA CONEX CONUS

ARFOR:

Air Management Cell

Fort Bliss, TX

AFFOR:

3 Combat Comms Group

Tinker AFB, OK

Fort Huachuca, AZ

Joint Interoperability

Test Command (JITC)

Portland, MA

AFFOR:

265 CCB

AFFOR:

269 CCB

Springfield, OH

Fort Hood, TXARFOR:

4ID Fires Support

46 Test SQ

Fires Air Component

Eglin AFB, FL

USARPAC:

PACOM mobile Command and Control

(C2) evaluation

Fort Shafter, HI

Savannah, GA

117 CBCS

Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD

JTF HQ

JNCC

Software Engineering Center (SEC)

Executive Agent, Theater Joint Tactical Networks

SEC C2SD and COMM WIN-T, Tactical Comms Test Bed

CERDEC: CryptoMod, Satellite & Terrestrial Comms Division

214TH Fires BDE FWD

National Guard Bureau (JISCC MI )

281st Combat Communications Group (J-6)

Industry: LGS, EADS, iDirect, L-3 NARDIA, LGS Innovations,

REDCOM, Solar Stik, SYS Tech, Telcordia, Ultra DNE and VIASAT

ARFOR HQ:

214 Fires BDE

Software Engineering Center

(SEC FSCD)

Fort Sill, OK

STRATCOM:

JUICE Supporting Combatant Command

Offutt AFB Omaha, NE

MARFOR:

Marine Corps Tactical Systems

Support Activity

Camp Pendleton, CA



UNCLASSIFIED


JOIN provides a persistent operational Cyberspace in which the Warfighter can validate and train prior to deployment

• JOIN provides an operational network to access and validate equipment and systems

• JOIN provides an operational environment to train and develop TTP’s

JOIN is based on the Operational Area Network (OAN)

• Database of the core tactical systems that the Service’s use and systems they access in the field today

• Maintained by the TJTN and housed on the TJTN Joint Collaboration TTP site (CJCSM 6231)

JOIN is a CyberSpace based on A Network-of-Networks

• Consisting of SIPR, NIPR, DREN, Commercial Internet, etc.

• Tactical and Strategic systems available locally or remotely



UNCLASSIFIED


Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts 18

JOIN Testing Throughout the Year: PKI

• Provided backbone network to authenticate network and web servers, sign and encrypt email, and perform certificate validation

HBSS - Security Data and Log Management (SDLM) Test

•Provided backbone network in support of PEO-C3T to further define requirements, architectures, and solutions for the flow of security event data in the Tactical and Strategic Army

•Participants: Cyber Integration, PEO C3T, ACERT, RCERT, AGNOSC, TRADOC, Other Army Security Event Stakeholders

Integrated SATCOM GIG Operations Management (ISOM)

• The objective of the ISOM JCTD is to develop a scalable Situational Awareness (SA) of Wideband MILSATCOM links and Policy Based Management (PBM) system that enables Dynamic reallocation and provisioning of MILSATCOM IP resources


UNCLASSIFIED


Develop and Validate TTP’s

• Equipment validation in an operational cyberspace prior to deployment

• Train on equipment in a similar operational network prior to deployment

• Ex: USMC Afghanistan pre-deployment validation, 1st CBCS AFRICOM system validation

Support Acquisition Community

• Provides Joint Services, PMs and other DoD agencies the capability to assess their systems in a joint environment, on demand

• Maintain an on demand Joint Tactical Force communications infrastructure utilizing existing joint equipment

Federate the C4ISR Campus and community

• A coalition of the willing seamlessly connecting labs-to-labs for enterprise level activities

• Maintain persistent connections to outside agencies and organizations in support of tactical and acquisition community



UNCLASSIFIED


Maintain and provide access to on demand communications capability minimizing start-up and technical requirements

Reduces travel requirements for pre-certification testing and interoperability by providing resources and networks for R&D throughout the year “on demand”

Provides an existing technical staff, experienced engineers, IT and IA staff, “the whole package, one stop shopping”

Maintains “collaborative relationships” with other key activities critical to R&D activities

Bottom Line: JOIN supports Joint Interoperability, saves time and dollars



UNCLASSIFIED


21

APG 6003

A2-309 DCGS SIL/LAB

APG 6006

B5-333DCGS-A

APG 6007

FBCB2 NOC

APG 6010

TSIL/WIN-T/

Crypto Mod

APG 3090

JSEC

APG 311

NEC, DCO

APG 6009 Annex/Yard

SEC Legacy SwitchesEdgewood PG

ECBC

Eglin AFB

Bold Quest

Fort Hood

JUICE Fires mission

Fort Hood

CTSF

Fort Sill

JUICE Fires Mission

Fort Bliss

JUICE Fires Mission

Regional HubPM WIN-T

Fort Monmouth

XTAR, X, C, Ku, Ka, WGS, GBS

Global Information Grid

DREN, DSN, VoSIP, SIPRNET,

NIPRNET, JWICS, DVS

APG 6002

D5-132 ANCDS

SIPRNET NIPRNET X Band 30 MB

DSN (Voice) DREN KU Band 10 MB

Commercial (Voice) Internet XTAR 6 MB

Idirect Sat hub Linkway Sat Hub (WIN-T)

Quad Band Sat

Total Connectivity

APG 6009

WIN-T/C2SD

APG 120

PEO-I, Fires, Coalition

Fort Leavenworth\

TSIL Mission

Taunton, MA

General Dynamics


http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.pyramidsystems.com/images/Navy_Logo.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.pyramidsystems.com/clients/clients_government.asp&usg=__tUODH1lYVE_qFe-pkoc1WLoH2eE=&h=900&w=900&sz=331&hl=en&start=1&zoom=1&itbs=1&tbnid=RXDagiaetLgM1M:&tbnh=146&tbnw=146&prev=/images?q=navy+logo&hl=en&tbs=isch:1


UNCLASSIFIED


LandWarNet 2011

Session 5: HBSS Test Observations from

the CTSF

PEO C3T TMD



UNCLASSIFIED


CTSF Testing

23

Dates Event

18 April – 6 May SWB2 HBSS Pilot

9 May – 20 May Data Analysis / Data Reduction

23 May – 3 June Assessment Report

3 June – 30 June SWB 2 AIC Testing with HBSS Installed

30 June Final Policy Release

Objective To execute a pre-defined set of mission threads and conduct policy tuning to define an initial HBSS policy baseline for the Software Block 2 system of systems June 30 Software release

Participant Role

CTSF Test and Evaluation Test Lead

PEO C3T ASA (ALT) HBSS Technical Lead

USAISEC / McAfee HBSS SME

PM Participants Engineering Support



UNCLASSIFIED


Date Delivery/Event

5 January 2011 • HQDA G-3/5/7 mandates ASA(ALT) fielding of HBSS

14 February – 25 March • HBSS architecture comparison test in Fort Gordon, GA

• Compared alternatives for ePO server placement in the tactical environment

29 March – 18 April • HBSS in theatre site survey completed

18 March • Land War Net General Office Steering Committee approves HBSS Architecture decision

18 April – 6 May • Initial SWB 2 HBSS Assessment to gain leadership concurrence on an initial rollout of HBSS to SWB 2 systems

• Initial set of global policies developed for ASA(ALT) POR SWB 2 Systems

27 May – 18 June • Preliminary testing on select program of record systems in Iraq

8 June – 29 June • Software Block 2 final system checkout for fielding

30 June • Program of record fielding released to SIF Portal



UNCLASSIFIED


HBSS Baseline Component: HBSS Component Role:

ePO Centralized Manager/Reporter

McAfee Agent (MA) Software Management Agent on Hosts

Policy Auditor (PA) (installation only) Reports Software Patching Statistics of the Host

Rogue System Detection (RSD) (not utilized)

Identifies Systems on the Network not Running HBSS

Asset Baseline Monitor (ABM) Detects System Level Data Changes

Host Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS) Blocks Malicious Activity at the Host

Anti-Spyware (ASE) Anti-Spyware

Anti-Virus (AVE) Anti-Virus

Device Manager (Host Data Loss Prevention)

Blocks USB Enabled Devices



UNCLASSIFIED


SWB2 Systems

Under Test

26

Program Executive Office (PEO)

Systems

Command Control and

Communications Tactical (C3T)

Army Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS), AFATDS Effects Management Tool (EMT), Battle Command Server (B Server),

Maneuver Control System Gateway (MCS GW), MCS Workstation, Battle Command Supply Support System (BCS3), Command Post of the Future (CPOF), Global Command and Control System – Army (GCCS-A),

Joint Capabilities Release (JCR), Joint Automated Deep Operations Coordination System (JADOCS), Warfighter Information Network –

Tactical Increment 1 (WIN-T INC 1)

Missiles and Space (M&S)

Air Defense Systems Integrator (ADSI), Air and Missile Defense Workstation (AMDWS), Forward Area Air Defense Command and

Control (FAAD C2)

Intelligence, Electronics Warfare & Sensors (IEW&S)

Distributed Common Ground System – Army (DCGS-A), Instrument Set, Reconnaissance and Surveying (ENFIRE), Integrated Meteorological

System (IMETS)

Aviation Tactical Airspace Integration System (TAIS), Aviation Mission Planning System (AMPS)



UNCLASSIFIED


Army Acquisition

Systems MAC I MAC II MAC III N/A

HBSS Compliant 54 2 27 17 8

HBSS Potentially Compatible

140 52 63 4 21

HBSS Not Compatible 235 50 96 41 48

Totals 429 104 186 62 77

27

There are 455 Information Systems entered into the APMS database assigned to the PEOs, ~ 429 are in the open category in the APMS tracking system

Each open PoR (429) in APMS was reviewed to determine if HBSS is compatible (~140) based upon the Army Cyber Command (ARCYBER) criteria, ~54 PoRs are compliant

Data provided by ASA(ALT) SOSE



UNCLASSIFIED


Army Acquisition

SystemsPEO C3T

PEO IEWS PEO EIS

PEO AVN

OtherPEOs

Potentially Compatible 140 70 35 1 10 24

SWB II Test 57 34 19 0 1 3

CS 11/12 Candidates 10 7 0 0 1 2

Additional Test Candidates 73 29 16 1 8 19

FY 13 + Systems 38 19 4 1 1 13

Waiver Candidates 34 5 7 0 16 6

Unknown Test Event 16 5 5 0 0 6

28

Of the (~140) compatible systems, (~57) were tested during SWB II, and additional (~10) are identified for CS 11/12, (~38) are identified as CS 13/14 or beyond, (~34) have been identified by PM offices as needing a waiver, leaving (~16) systems that need to determine an appropriate test venue

Data provided by ASA(ALT) SOSESession 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts


UNCLASSIFIED


29

June 30, 2011

Feb 17, 2012

Worldwide fielding estimated one

year past policy release date.


TBD: Pending

ARCYBER Direction

Global Policies created for June 30 release

• Allowed for consistency• Allows easier administration• Achieved FRAGO 13 Minimum

Protection Model Lessons Learned

• Recommend System SpecificPolicies and Secure Site Protection be released gradually

• Effective Policy Tuning is time consuming• Importance of Policy Configuration Management• Module Conflicts (Symantec and Anti-Virus)• CPU Load on older hardware• Intermittent agent to server communication issues• Additional Policy Tuning in live environment required for end-state implementation• Effective HBSS Management and Policy Tuning can ONLY be done by the system owner


UNCLASSIFIED


30

Permanently integrates HBBS into CTSF testing

•90 day maintenance releases planned by CTSF Team

• Integration of HBSS in to ongoing AIC planned

Detailed PM policy configuration management process for distribution and management

•PM policy changes from CTSF testing to operational ePO servers

Additional policy tuning with each release

•September 30 Release targeting HIPS Block Low

•Future releases targeting FRAGO 13 Secure Site (individual system policies required)

•Develop core full-time technical competency with HBSS

Allow sufficient burn-in time for simulated mission threads

Continue policy tuning in the fieldSession 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2001-08-24//Current Interoperability/IA Efforts


UNCLASSIFIED


31

Phase 1:

Policy Release Date:

Jun 30, 2011

• Software Block 2 Release (Global Policy)

• Includes client modules only: HIPS, MA, VSE, ABM, PA (installation only), and

DLP.

• Uses existing ePO server architecture

• FRAGO 13 Minimum Protection + Firewall (moderate)

Phase 2a:

Policy Release Date:

Sep 30, 2011

• Software Block 2 and CS 11-12 Release (Global Policy)

• Includes client modules only: HIPS, MA, VSE, ABM, PA (installation only), and

DLP

• Uses existing ePO server architecture

• FRAGO 13 Protected Site + IPS Block Low + Firewall (moderate)

Phase 2b:

Policy Release Date: 17

Feb, 2012

• Software Block 2 and CS 11-12 Release (Global Policy)

• Includes client modules only: HIPS, MA, VSE, ABM, PA, and DLP

• Adds PA Benchmarks, naming standard, and domain integration

• FRAGO 13 Protected Site + IPS Block Low + Firewall (moderate) + PA

benchmarks

Phase 3:

Release Date:

Estimated Mar – Apr

2011

• ePO Server Rollout to Division Level with optional Brigade implementation

• Rollout schedule is TBD at this time.


• Worldwide fielding estimated one year past policy release date.

• Train the trainer for embedded Digital Systems Engineers (DSE)

• Over the shoulder training for ePO administrators as required


UNCLASSIFIED


32Session 5, Track 6 (C4ISR ME)2011-08-24 //Current Interoperability/IA Efforts

CECOM C4ISR ME provides worldwide connectivity over multiple networks to efficiently and effectively access geographically dispersed Cyber Transformation expertise to design, develop, and instantiate an integrated and interoperable enterprise networks consisting of transport, systems, platforms, and applications.

These networks facilitate Army, Joint and Coalition Cyber Transformation while at war via events and exercises such as AGILE Fires, Coalition Interoperability Assurance and Validation, and JUICE

CECOM C4ISR ME secures the Army’s enterprise networks with the deployment of state-of-the-art tools such as HBSS


UNCLASSIFIED



Documents

LandWarNet 2011 - AFCEA · PDF fileunclassified landwarnet 2011 unclassified transforming cyber while at war session 5, track 6 (c4isr me) cpof tigr corps div bct bn co plt sqd/sldr